Generelt
4. Oktober 2011
Commission Regulation EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I (Part M)
Relaterede EASA decisions
”Acceptable means of compliance (AMC)”
”Guidens Material (GM)”
EASA og General Aviation (GA)
GA er jo ikke raketvidenskab
EASA og GA
Hvem er GA problematikken henvendt til ?
Type af operation:
EASA og GA
Hvem er GA problematikken henvendt til ?
Type af luftfartøj:
EASA og GA
http://easa.europa.eu/events/events.php?startdate=27-10-011&page=Part-M_GA_Workshop
EASA og GA
EASA og GA
Emner til Part M - GA ”workshop”:
• Format of the rules
• Generic maintenance programs and indirect approval procedures
• Approval/acceptance of repairs and modifications
• Acceptance of components from US and Canada
• Scope of work authorised to the pilot-owner
• Scope of work authorised to independent certifying staff
• Licensing requirements for certifying staff
• Qualification and position (incompatibilities) requirements for airworthiness review staff
• Performance of the airworthiness review and issuance of ARC
Fortsat Luftdygtigheds styringsaftale
M.A.201 Responsibilities
The owner is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft and shall ensure that no flight takes place unless:
1. the aircraft is maintained in an airworthy condition, and;
2. any operational and emergency equipment fitted is correctly installed and serviceable or clearly identified as unserviceable, and;
3. the airworthiness certificate remains valid, and;
4. the maintenance of the aircraft is performed in accordance with the approved maintenance programme as specified in M.A.302.
(e) In order to satisfy the responsibilities of paragraph (a),
(i) The owner of an aircraft may contract the tasks associated with continuing airworthiness to a continuing airworthiness management organisation approved in accordance with Section A, Subpart G of this Annex (Part M). In this case, the continuing airworthiness management organisation assumes responsibility for the proper accomplishment of these tasks.
Fortsat Luftdygtigheds styringsaftale
Appendix I
Continuing Airworthiness Arrangement
5.2. Obligations of the owner:
not modify the aircraft without first consulting the approved
organisation;
inform the approved organisation of all maintenance exceptionally
carried out without the knowledge and control of the approved
organisation;
report to the approved organisation through the logbook all defects
Found during operations;
inform on a regular basis the approved organisation about the
aircraft flying hours and any other utilisation data, as agreed with
the approved organisation;
CAMO Contracting
SUBPART B ACCOUNTABILITY
M.A.201 Responsibilities
h) In the case of commercial air transport the operator is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft it operates and shall:
Be approved, as part of the air operator certificate issued by the competent authority, pursuant to M.A. Subpart G for the aircraft it operates;
AOC holder skal være godkendt i henhold til Part M
subpart G altså med en CAMO.
CAMO Contracting
CAMO Contracting
„Contracting of continuing airworthiness management activities‟
CAMO Contracting
Issue: Continuing Airworthiness Management of aircraft
The current regulation:
Requires the CAT operator to manage the continuing airworthiness
of its fleet itself and therefore to be CAMO approved;
Allows any CAMO (linked to a CAT operator or not) to contract (to
approved or nonapproved organisations) certain CAM tasks under
its own quality system.
CAMO Contracting
The Agency proposes:
to provide more AMCs/GMs on the level of involvement of
the CAMO when it decides to contract certain CAM tasks
under its own quality system,
to amend the requirements of Part-M to provide more
flexibility to a CAT operator by allowing it to contract the
full CAM of its aircraft to an approved CAMO registered in
a Member State, subject to the introduction of appropriate
controls.
CAMO Contracting
Common Responce Document (CRD) not ready.
CAMO Quality Monitoring
CAMO quality monitoring of contracted activities to the Part 145 (Part F) organisations
Contracting not sub-contracting
CAMO Quality Monitoring
Dear Gian Andrea,
M.A.712 does not talk about "audits" but about "monitoring".
According to M.A.712(a), it is the function and responsibility of the
Quality System and the Quality Manager to "monitor" compliance
with, and the adequacy of, procedures required to ensure airworthy
aircraft.
This includes at least the areas described in M.A.712(b),which
includes "monitoring" that all contracted maintenance is carried out
in accordance with the contract.
CAMO Quality Monitoring
Looking now to AMC M.A.712(a) and AMC A.712(b), it is
clear that the "monitoring" function includes the performance of
"audits" (in addition it also includes a "feedback" system).
Nevertheless, and no matter the terms we use, what I think
should be clear for everybody is the following:
In order for the CAMO to comply with M.A.708(a) it must
continuously verify (or “monitor”, or “check”or whatever they want
to call it) that the maintenance is performed in accordance with the
contract.
CAMO Quality Monitoring
Otherwise they cannot ensure, for example,That:
“all maintenance is performed in accordance with the
maintenance programme and released in accordance with
M.A. Subpart H”.
This responsibility can not be transferred to the Quality System
because the audits they perform (as part of the monitoring function
described in M.A.712 only happen periodically). These audits should
be focused on verifying that the CAMO is properly monitoring
compliance with the maintenance contracts, which of course should
not only include verifying that the CAMO is monitoring compliance
with the contract but also some actual sampling of maintenance
activities verifying that they have been performed according to the
contract.
CAMO Quality Monitoring
Best regards
Juan Anton
Continuing Airworthiness Manager
Product safety unit – Rulemaking Directorate
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
CAMO Quality Monitoring
En CAMO‟s kvalitets afdeling, skal altså ikke gennemfører en Part
145 audit af en ”kontraktet” organisation, for at tilfredsstille
kravene jf. MA 712 samt MA 708. Man kan altså accepterer den
godkendelse som den pågældende Part 145 organisation har fået
udstedt af myndighederne og stole på at, disse myndigheder samt
organisationens kvalitetssystem, har sikret tilfredsstillende forhold i
den ”kontraktede” organisation.
Men en CAMO‟s kvalitets afdeling bør tjekke at organisationen,
kontinuerligt bruger og tjekker de procedure og processer som er
indeholdt i kontrakten. Og som et tillæg hertil lave ”stikprøve
kontrol” af de elementer som kontrakten omhandler. For eksempel
komponenter eller luftfartøjer med fysisk audit og gennemgang af
dokumentation for samme.
EASA Standardisation
Hvorfor er myndighederne så forskellige i deres måde at behandle de samme sager ?
Hvad gør Trafikstyrelsen for at “ensrette” sagsbehandlingen landene imellem?
Hvad gør EASA for at “ensrette” sagsbehandlingen?
EASA Standardisation
Maintenance Standardisation Team ( MAST)
Competent Authorities Standardisation Meetings
Ca. to gange årligt
Agreed Practises er nu blevet til “conclusions”
Spørgsmål ?