Download - 2003 biologic width
1
Pre-prosthetic crown lengthening procedure
王英斌20031221
2
The predictability of the esthetics may be determined by the patient’s presenting
anatomy rather than the clinician’s ability to manage state-of-the-art
procedures
Kois J. 2001
3
Contents
• How much should I have appropriate distance between osseous crest and final margin ?
• Esthetic consideration • Restorative consideration • Stability of soft tissue dimension after
surgical CLP• Conclusion
4
What is biologic width ?
何謂生理寬度 ?
5
Dentogingival complex
Ginigival sulcus 0.69mmGinigival sulcus 0.69mm
Junctional Epithelium 0.97mmJunctional Epithelium 0.97mm ( 0.71-1.35mm)( 0.71-1.35mm)
Connective tissue attachment 1.07mmConnective tissue attachment 1.07mm ( 1.06-1.08mm )( 1.06-1.08mm )
Biologic widthBiologic width
6
Epi. attachment 1.14 (0.32-3.27)Connective tissue attachment 0.77 (0.29-1.84)Sulcus depth 1.34 (0.26-6.03)
Vacek JS et al 1994
7
Dimensions of human dentogingival junction
Ant. teeth 1.75 Premolar 1.97 Molar 2.08
Vacek JS et al 1994
epithlieum was variable ,but c.t. tissue
attatchment was consistent Gargiulo AW 1961
Vacek JS et al 1994
8
• The biologic width follows the osseous scallop• The osseous scallop parallels
the cemento-enamel junction circumferentially .
Anterior teeth : scallop
posterior teeth : flat
9
Ferrule effect (1.5mm)
360 degree metal collar of the crown surrounding the parallel walls of the dentin extending apical to the shoulder of the preparation Libman& Nicholls 1995 IJP
pulpless tooth– post&core
Spear F. 1999 compendium
10
The influence of margins of restorations on the periodontal tissues over 26 years
increased loss of attachment found in teeth sub-
gingival restorations(>1mm) started slowly and could be detected clinically 1-3 years after the fabrication and placement of the restorations
Schätzle M et. al. J Clin Perio 2000;27:57-64
11
Osseous crest-final margin
Supra-gingival margin • Not need post-core tooth 2(B)+0.5-1(safe) =2.5-3mm• Post-core tooth
2(B)+1.5(F)+0.5-1(safe) = 4-4.5mm Subgingival margin • Not need post-core tooth 2(B)+0.5-1(safe)+1(sulcus) =3.5-4mm• Post-core tooth 2(B)+1.5(F)+0.5-1(safe)+1(sulcus) = 5-5.5mm
12
Response to this invasion• Crestal bone loss
• Gingival recession and localized bone loss
• Localized gingival hyperplasia with minimal bone loss
• Combination
13
Inflammatory Disease control first
14
Restorative –driven Esthetic –driven
15
Anterior crown lengthening
• 2mm tooth structure—minimal retention and resistance form
• 2mm – biologic width • 1mm – sulcus depth• 1.5mm –ferrule effect
16
Facial profile
Smile line
17
18
• Biotype of the periodontium (thick or thin)
• Relationship of gingiva to the osseous crest
• Relationship of preparation finish line to the osseous crest
19
Relationship of gingiva to the osseous crest ( dentogingival complex )
Normal crest (85%) facial FGM –crest : 3mm inter-proximal : 4mm high crest (2%) low crest (13%) Kois j 1994
– bone sounding
20
Aesthetic crown lengthening
Should always first consider whether orthodontic extrusion extrusion is
appropriate
21
The role of orthodontics in crown lengthening
22
1. Root length(C/R) 4. Relative importance 2. Root form 5. Esthetics3. Level of fracture 6. Endo/perio prognosis
23
Alveolar bone augmentation for implants by orthodontic extrusion
Salama & Salama IJPRD 1993
24
Uneven gingival margins
Orthodontic movement to
reposition the gingival margin
Surgical correction of
gingival margin discrepancies
25
Probing labial sulcular depth
of 2 central incisors
Shorter tooth has deep sulcular depth
Excisional gingivectomy
Delayed passive eruption
26
Repositioning of the gingival margin by extrusion
27
是否有磨耗 ??
the incisal edges abraded??
Incisal edge is thicker labiolingually
than the adjacent tooth
Abraded
Intrude the short central incisor
Stablized at least 6M
28
Repositioning of the gingival margin
by intrusion
29
Posterior crown lengthening
• 2mm tooth structure—minimal retention and resistence form
• 2mm – biologic width • 1mm – sulcus depth
30
Restorability ??
For What ??
31
Crown-root ratio
Non-CLP Surgically CLP
Orthodontic extrusion
32
Kennedy Class I & II distal-most mand. P2
•Pulpless teeth are commonly avoided as abutment for an RPD ,especially if terminal abutment is for distal extension
Kratochvil FJ 1988
33
Treatment choices
1 > extraction ? implant
2 > CLP bridge ??
34
Take into consideration about mucogingival condition
35
Crown-lengthening procedures
36
.
Aesthetic osseous surgery
美觀性的齒槽骨手術
37
Buccal scalloped incision• Double-scalloped creates triangular soft tissue within the
healthy gingiva that protects the furcation area of multi-rooted molars during healing
38
-Apically positioned 0.5-1mm apical to osseous crest -Provides the interproximal soft tissue for primary flap adaptation
Palatal scalloped incision
shape of the incision follows the radicular morphology and the depth should be at the level of palatal osseous crest or slightly at the level to that after osteoplasty and ostectomy are accomplished
39
• 15-degree declining buccopalatal slope
The well-declined bucco-lingual interproximal slope prevents inter-dental gingival proliferate on and bridging,which ultimately lead to pocket formation
40
Crown lengthening in mand. molars : A 5-year retrospective radiographic analysis
Dibart S. et al J P 2003 ;74:851-821
Critical distance from the furcation (CDF) – furcation entrance to the margin of the temp crown or excavated caries line
10/26 ( 38.5%) – radiographic FI
• critical distance from the furcation = 4mm
41
Tooth fracture treatment with orthodontic extrusion
42
Stability of soft tissue dimension after surgery
• Different surgical intervention
• Surgical skill
• Healing time
• Patient age
• Tissue biotype
43
Coronal displacement of the gingival margin
• more pronounced in patients with thick tissue biotype
• Individual variation • Not related to age or gender
Pontoriero R. et al JP 2001;72:841-848
44
Desired vs actual amount
• Clinicians may be need to be more aggressive during surgical crown lengthening procedure ,esp. disto-lingual aspect
Herrero F. et al JP 1995;66:568-571
45
Recommended
-- early definition of final margin
-- re-provisonalization 3weeks after the
surgical procedure
-- more aggressive removal of osseous structure
46
Timing for prosthetics
• Mean tissue recession following surgery was 1.32mm , while 29% of sites demonstrated 1-4mm gingival recession between 6weeks and 6 M post-operatively .
Brägger U et al 1992
47
Timing for prosthetics
• Definite crown preparation should not be made for at least 20W after surgery for ant. teeth
Wise MD 1985
The biological width was re-established to its original vertical dimension by 6 M
Lanning SK et al JP2003;74:468-474
48
Conclusion
There may be different ways of treating a disease,but there can be but one correct diagnosis
Morton Amsterdam 1974
49
Thanks for your attention !!