Transcript
Page 1: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

1

Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey

Page 2: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

2

Value Propositions and Accenture

Common KM Value Propositions• Effectiveness/Responsiveness.• Efficiency.• Innovation.

Accenture• KXchange – representative approach and mindset of many!

• Technology: D-Base, Discussion Forums, Collaborative Tools and Expertise Locators.

• Massive investment in technology and organization infrastructure.• Works well with repeatable work (when you can drive re-use) and

where information is really what needs to be transferred.

Page 3: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

3

Information Versus Knowledge in Retail Banking

Page 4: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

4

DocumentsDocumentsDatabasesDatabases

ReportsReports

• FactsFacts• IdeasIdeas• TheoriesTheories

• IntuitionIntuition• BeliefsBeliefs• ValuesValues

• RoutinesRoutines• ProceduresProcedures• InstructionsInstructions

• ExpertiseExpertise• InstinctsInstincts• Informal Informal

PracticesPractices

EXPLICIT TACIT

KnowWhat

KnowHow

ManualsManualsEngineering Engineering

MethodsMethods

DialogueDialogueConversationConversation

MentoringMentoring

ExperienceExperienceApprenticeshipsApprenticeships

CoachingCoaching

Types of Knowledge

Page 5: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

5

1. Knowledge & Strategy.

2. KM at McKinsey.

3. Remembering 9/11.

Page 6: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

6

Cluster in groups of 2-3… My left side of the room focus on codification. Be prepared to

discuss:• Randall Love’s search• The overall strategy and economics• Primary investments in technology and infrastructure to support it.• Incentive schemes (and focus)

My right side of the room focus on personalization. Be prepared to discuss:• Marcia Blenko’s search• The overall strategy and economics• Primary investments in technology and infrastructure to support it.• Incentive schemes (and focus)

Where Would You Characterize Accenture? McKinsey?

Page 7: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

7

Choose between Two Strategies

Codification• Link is person-to-document

• Extract, store and share through computers

• Reuse codified knowledge across similar tasks

Personalization• Link is person-to-person

• Share and apply through people networks

• Channel expert advice to unique problems

Page 8: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

8

Codification: Access Health

Call-in medical center with 500 nurses Nurses assess and direct patients Use 500 pre-developed software algorithms

“We’re not inventing new ways to cure decease. We’re taking available knowledge and inventing processes to put it to better use.”

CEO Joe Tallman

Page 9: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

9

AH relies on “Reuse Economics”

Costs:1 algorithm=$40,000variable costs=$20.

Usage:For first 300 algorithms; reused 8,000 times on average last year

Reuse of knowledge assets drives profits, not economiesof scale based on volume

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

no. times reuse of software algorithm

Avg

. cos

t p

er d

iagn

osis

(do

llar)

Page 10: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

10

Personalization: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

No. 1 rated cancer center in the U.S. Most innovative and customized cancer treatment in

the country Heavily based on personal communication between

doctors, scientists, etc. Co-located in 17 disease teams; meetings Investing heavily in re-use misses the point here

Page 11: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

11

Different strategies, different drivers

Codification Fast, efficient delivery of

products “reuse economics” People: “implementers”

Personalization unique solutions to unique

problems “expert economics” People: “inventors”

Page 12: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

12

Incentives and IT systems differ

IT for Codified: heavy investments “library” + search engines

Incentives for codified:

- to write up documents,

- to use documents

IT for Personalized: minor investments “people-finders” + search for

people

Incentives for personalized:

- to help others directly

- to ask for help

Page 13: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

13

1. Knowledge & Strategy.

2. KM at McKinsey.

3. Remembering 9/11.

Page 14: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

14

McKINSEY3 minutes to come up with THE answer

• What strategically differentiates McKinsey? How does KM (repositories, collaborative technologies and employee development) play into this?

• What were the key elements of the knowledge management project launched in 1987?

• Be prepared to discuss the Jeff Peters vignette. Specifically, how did he solve his problem?

• What challenges does McKinsey face as evidenced in the case and vignettes?

Page 15: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

15

General Case Questions: McKINSEY• What strategically differentiates McKinsey? How does KM in terms of

repositories, collaborative technologies and employee development play into this?

• Solve tough, high-end and big-dollar problems that require a high degree of expertise and creativity.

• People are inventors, not implementers.

• Most problems are unique and solutions customized.

• KM investments for them are heavily oriented to connecting people.

• Technically (expertise locators and even repositories)

• Organizationally (staffing and culture).

Page 16: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

16

General Case Questions: McKINSEY

• What were the key elements of the knowledge management project launched in 1987?

• A common database of client work (e.g., sales presentations, deliverables, analytic techniques, etc.).

• Client Sectors and Competence Centers hired a full time practice coordinator to monitor quality and direct consultants to content.

• Established both I shaped and T shaped career paths.

• Knowledge Resource Directory (paper-based) of firm experts and documents.

How important was it that the 2,000 documents that Matasonni and Manville collected be high quality?

Page 17: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

17

Jeff Peters in Sydney• Be prepared to discuss the Jeff Peters vignette. Specifically, how did he

solve his problem?

• Issue: Bid for growth strategy of respected financial services organization. But local industry expertise “conflicted out.”

• Resolution: Immediately began using his personal network. Via this found Jeff Peters in Boston (though unavailable for 6 weeks).

• His help: 1) John Peacocke (New Zealand – 2 years in McKinsey – mostly oil and gas); 2) Patty Akopiantz (1 Year Associate with prior I-Bank experience) and 3) Jonathon Liew (first McKinsey assignment).

• Forged group of experts from all over the world.

• Found 179 relevant PD documents and followed up with 60 more people.

• Won the project and client bought in.

• Jeff not happy though (no breakthrough too much reliance inside firm).

Page 18: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

18

Page 19: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

19

Video Points of Importance• For you aspiring consultants, note the opening comment about the pressure to come

up with a unique solution (with little experience).

• First stop is PD Net. They do re-use documents. But note that they also use these documents to determine who to turn to for help.

• Key is finding the 3-4 teams somewhere around the globe that can coach you through the process.

• Culture in McKinsey where you both add to the knowledge base and when you respond when asked.

• In part a product of the “One Firm” culture and hiring.

• Performance evals. from day one also emphasize both knowledge contribution (PD output) and help to others.

• Personal development and feedback built in at all stages.

• Learning during an engagement via feedback sessions.

• Development key to assignments during engagement.

Page 20: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

20

General Case Questions: McKINSEY

• What challenges does McKinsey face as evidenced in the case and vignettes?

• Managing growth: Difficult to scale the way Accenture does.

• Leveraging external expertise:

• Reaching outside the firm.

• Integrating experienced hires.

Page 21: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

21

A Web of “Effective” Information Flow…

= Associate

= Associate Principal= Manager

Hierarchy

= Principal & Director

Page 22: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

22

A low proportion of people regularly reach outside McKinsey for knowledge

55

27

811

55

32

48

Under 1 year

Over 1 year

McKinsey Boston

McKinsey other

Client Other

Experienced hires are the

main exception

* Percentage of top 7 information contacts from each source type

Page 23: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

23

We are three times less likely to go outside our pod for regular information

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9Information sharing*

Within same pod

Neighboring pod

2 pods away

More than 2 pods away (or different floor)

Distance

* Weekly information sharing out of a possible 100% of interactions

vs.

Page 24: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

24

1. Knowledge & Strategy.

2. KM at McKinsey.

3. Remembering 9/11.

Page 25: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

25

What does this have to do with knowledge management??

Page 26: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

26

Give Me Five Minutes of Thought

How can KM be applied to national security?• Within Agencies?• Between Agencies?• Targeting Initiatives.• Educating.

• Us• Them

Page 27: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

27

KM and National Security Within Agencies Bureaucracy Can Stifle “Knowing What We Know.”

• CIA developing an ability to surge.

• NSA is creating new leadership networks and data mining algorithms.

Turf Wars Between Agencies (CIA and FBI) Preclude Action.• Homeland Security Office (22 agencies, 200,000 employees and $37.5B)• Bio-Terrorism Response Capability.

Page 28: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

28

9/11: A Data (Dis)Integration Case Study

January 2000: Mohamed Atta obtains U.S. visa

Who knew? State Department

June 2000: Atta meets with Iraqi intelligence in Prague

Who knew? Central Intelligence Agency

June 2000: Atta enters the U.S.

Who knew? Immigration and Naturalization Service

Page 29: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

29

9/11: Case Study, Continued

July 2000: $100K wired to Mawan al-Shehhi, pilot of one of two planes that struck WTC

Who knew? Treasury Department

December 2000: Atta and al-Shehhi leave stalled airplane on Miami runway

Who knew? Federal Aviation Administration

July 2001: Agent warns of potential terrorists in training at U.S. flight schools

Who knew? Federal Bureau of Investigation

Page 30: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

30

KM and National Security Within Agencies Bureaucracy Can Stifle “Knowing What We Know.”

• CIA developing an ability to surge.

• NSA is creating new leadership networks and data mining algorithms.

Turf Wars Between Agencies (CIA and FBI) Preclude Action.• Homeland Security Office (22 agencies, 200,000 employees and $37.5B)• Bio-Terrorism Response Capability.

Targeting Interventions.• Combat almost exclusively about information.• A key target is finding and disrupting networks.

Page 31: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

31

Small World Metrics• CC = 0.41• CPL = 4.75• Shortcuts = 0.19

Prior Contacts

http://www.orgnet.com/MappingTerroristNetworks.pdf

Page 32: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

32

KM and National Security Within Agencies Bureaucracy Can Stifle “Knowing What We Know.”

• CIA developing an ability to surge.

• NSA is creating new leadership networks and data mining algorithms.

Turf Wars Between Agencies (CIA and FBI) Preclude Action.• Homeland Security Office (22 agencies, 200,000 employees and $37.5B)• Bio-Terrorism Response Capability.

Targeting Interventions.• Combat almost exclusively about information.• A key target is finding and disrupting networks.

Educating Different Parties.• How do you help create understanding amongst disparate groups?• Religious and socio-economic differences.

Page 33: 1 Knowledge Strategy & McKinsey. 2 Value Propositions and Accenture  Common KM Value Propositions Effectiveness/Responsiveness. Efficiency. Innovation

33

Discussion Questions For Class On Knowledge Generation

Be prepared to tell me about the knowledge brokering steps (and provide examples at each point).


Top Related