document resume ed 393 361 he 029 036 author … · 2014-05-14 · document resume. ed 393 361 he...
TRANSCRIPT
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 393 361 HE 029 036
AUTHOR DeSalvatore, Kristen; Hughes, LindaTITLE State-Funded Scholarship/Grant Programs for Students
To Attend Postsecondary Education Institutions.National Association of Student Grant & Aid Programs(NASSGAP) 26th Annual Survey Report. 1994-95 AcademicYear
INSTITUTION New York State Higher Education Services Corp.,Albany.
ZUB DATE Feb 96NOTE 53p.; For the 1993-94 report, see ED 371 701.PUB TYPE Statistical Data (110) -- Reports Descriptive (141)
EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Educational Trends; *Grants; Higher Education;
*National Surveys; *Scholarships; *State Aid; *StatePrograms; *Student Financial Aid; Trend Analysis
ABSTRACT
This report presents data for the 1994-95 academicyear on state-funded student aid in 13 tables. States awarded over $3billion in student aid to over 1.8 million students, an increase of 8percent over 1993-94. Of this award, 78 percent was need-based aid toundergraduate and graduate students, while 13 percent wasnon-need-based, and 9 percent fel/ in the category of "other aid." Ofthe $2.5 billion in need-based aid available, 99 percent went toundergraduates. Of the $407 million in non-need-based aid, 91 percentwent to undergraduates. Five states (California, Illinois, NewJersey, New York, and Pennsylvania) collectively awarded $1.5 billionin undergraduate need-based aid, comprising 61 percent of the totalawarded in this category. A number of states increased their effortsignificantly between 1988-89 and 1994-95, increasing expenditures by100 percent or more over the period. These states were Alaska,Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, North Dakota,Virginia, Washington, and West Virginia. Five states reported anincrease in need-based undergraduate funds of more than $20 millionover 1993-94 levels. These states were California, Illinois, NewJersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. The tables provide detailed databy state and also show data for previous years for comparison.(DB)
***********************************************************************Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made
from the original document.***********************************************************************
r\o
NASSGAP26th Annual Survey Report
vate Student .3
ti
Wct4
1994-95 Academic )(ear"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
NASSGAP
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)."
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOtIce or Educabonai Research and Improvement
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)
This document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it
0 Minor changes have been made to ImproverproductIon quatuty
Rants oleo**, opintons staled in the docu,MAI do Poi nocosoordy represent 0/13ctal 11;CT MN AVAILABLE
........) The National Association of State Student Grant & Aid Programs
NASSGAP26th Annual Survey Report
1994-95 Academic YearState-Funded Scholarship/Grant Programs for
Students to AttendPostsecondary Education Institutions
Prepared by:
Kristen De SalvatoreProgram Research Specialist II
Linda HughesCalculations Clerk
Editorial Assistance Provided by:
Seth D. Honeyman
Director of Research, Analysis & Information Management
Charles G. Treadwell
Director of Federal Relations
Graphics Produced by:
Tony Kruegler
Publications Production Assistant
New York State Higher Education Services CorporationFebruary 1996 r
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 1
Table One 2Estimated Total Grant Aid Awarded By State Programs, 1994-95
Table Two 3Actual 1988-89, 1991-92, & 1994-95 Need-Based andNon-Need-Based Grant Aid Awarded to Undergraduateand Graduate/Professional Students, By State
Table Three 4State Student Incentive Grant Program Activity By States
Table Four 5Other Programs Administered By The State Agency
Table Five 11Selected Program Characteristics, 1994-95
Table Six 181994-95 Number and Percent of Awards and Dollars by Sector forComprehensive Undergraduate Need-Based Scholarship andGrant Programs
Table Seven 22Comments To Better Understand Agency Positions
Table Eight 26Aggregate Dollars of Awards for Undergraduate Need-Based GrantPrograms, By State, Grouped by Award Dollar Volumes, 1989-90to 1994-95
Table NineEstimated Grant Dollars Per Resident Population, 1994-95, By State
28
Table Ten 29Estimated Grant Dollars Per Resident College-Age Population,1994-95, By State
Table ElevenEstimated Grant Dollars to Undergraduates in 1994-95 Per Full-TimeUndergraduate Enrollment, By State
Table TwelveEstimated Percentage of Full-Time Undergraduates Receiving GrantAwards in 1994-95, By State
Table ThirteenTotal State Grants As a Percentage of Appropriations of State Tax Fundsfor Operating Expenses of Higher Education in 1994-95
30
31
32
Executive Summary
The 26th Annual NASSGAP Survey Report of the 1994-95 academic year is astreamlined version compiled and published for the first time by the New York StateHigher Education Services Corporation (HESC). The Report has been compiled andpublished in previous years by thq Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Authority(PHEAA) and originally by the Illinois State Scholarship Commission.
The data and tables represent actual 1994-95 academic year data. Unlike pastyear reports, current year estimates are not included.
In the 1994-95 academic year, the states awarded over $3 billion in student aidto over 1.8 million students, an increase of 8% over 1993-94. Of the amr nt awarded,78% was need-based aid to undergraduate and graduate students, whi. 13% of it wasnon-need-based aid to undergraduates and graduates (the remaining 9% fell in thecategory of "other aid"- see Table One).
Of the $2.5 billion in need-based aid available, 99% went to undergraduates. Ofthe $407 million in non-need-tased ea awarded, 91% was awarded to undergraduates.
Five states (California, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania)collectively awarded $1.5 billion in undergraduate need-based aid, comprising 61% ofthe total awarded in this category.
A number of states increased their effort significantly between 1988-89 to1994-95, increasing exenditures by 100% or more over the period. These states were:Alaska (+860.3%), Arkansas (+113.1%), Florida (+103.7%), Georgia (+506.4%),Kansas (+120.2%), Louisiana (+388.8%), Maine (+402.5%), North Dakota (+106.9%),Virginia (+247.8%), Washington (+320.2%), and West Virginia (+203.3%).
Five states report an increase in need-based undergraduate funds of more than$20 million over 1993-94 levels. These states were California (+$24.1 million), Illinois(+$29.5 million), New Jersey (+$24.4 million), Pennsylvania (+$29.9 million), andVirginia (447.5 million).
Additional copies of this report may be obtained for $5.00 per copy by sending a check madepayable to New York State Higher Education Services Corporation (HESC),99 Washington Avenue, Room 1438, Albany, NY 12255, Attention: NASSGAP.
Table One
Estimated Total Grant Aid Awarded By State Grant Programs, 1994-95(S amounts in millions)
Need-Based AldUndergrads Grads
Non-Need-Based AldUndergrads Grads
OtherAid"
TotalGrants
ALABAMA $2.281 $0.042 $6.806 $2.978 $ $12.108ALASKA 0.444 1.764 2.209ARIZONA 3.482 0.011 3.493ARKANSAS 8.907 0.740 0.156 9.803CALIFORNIA 232.067 2.423 160.800 395.290
COLORADO 18.252 1.012 12.621 1.143 33.028CONNECTICUT 20.690 0.215 20.905DELAWARE 1.033 0.175 0.202 0.425 1.835DIST OF COLUMBIA* 1.022 0.054 0.978 2.054FLORIDA 36.824 61.886 0.743 99.454
GEORGIA 5.147 111.410 1.600 118.157HAWAII 0.732 0.732IDAHO 0.779 0.027 0.264 1.070ILLINOIS 244.352 25.970 270.322INDIANA 67.742 0.420 68.162
IOWA 35.642 0.469 0.072 36.183KANSAS 9.802 0.406 2.118 0.236 12.562KENTUCKY 25.517 25.517LOUISIANA 6.429 6.650 0.012 13.091MAINE 5.787 0.402 0.901 7.090
MARYLAND 24.571 0.262 7.064 0.230 32.127MASSACHUSETTS 61.850 0.095 61.945MICHIGAN 8140 4.266 85.605MINNESOTA 97.920 0.040 97.960MISSISSIPPI 1.248 0.058 0.048 1.200 2.555
MISSOURI 11.913 11.273 0.250 23.435MONTANA 0.419 0.419NEBRASKA 2.726 2.726NEVADA* 0.342 0.060 0.402NEW HAMPSHIRE 1.425 0.068 0.052 1.545
NEW JERSEY 159.683 10.141 169.824NEW MEXICO 13.886 0.794 0.145 14.825NEW YORK 636.704 9.495 7.159 3.187 656.545NORTH CAROLINA 13.774 2.900 28.940 0.770 47.446 93.830NORTH DAKOTA 1.996 0.316 1.868 4.181
OHIO 91.225 32.907 0.383 124.516OKLAHOMA 13.325 1.636 2.986 0.255 18.202OREGON 13.761 13.761PENNSYLVANIA 218.604 0.064 0.516 219.184RHODE ISLAND 6.340 6.340
SOUTH CAROLINA 17.297 6.043 23.340SOUTH DAKOTA* 0.589 0.072 0.064 0.725TENNESSEE 18.313 0.833 19.146TEXAS 29.102 2.436 42.204 73.742UTAH 1.129 1.531 0.980 16.990 20.630
VERMONT 11.788 0.146 0.050 0.241 12.224VIRGINIA 53.885 1.546 17.339 10.352 83.122WASHINGTON 53.369 0.005 0.841 54.214WEST VIRGINIA 6.761 6.320 2.774 2.680 18.534WISCONSIN 49.511 0.024 2.844 8.436 60.815WYOMING 0.225 0.225PUERTO RICO 22.074 1.289 23.363
Totals $2,444.025 $28.121 $360.856 $35.936 $284.130 $3,153.068
Figures for these States are from 1993-94 Annual Survey Report.** Other aid includes aid administered by other agencies, special veteran's programs, tuition waiver programs, special
mat:Jung programs and state-specific programs.
Table Two
Actual 1988-89, 1991-92, & 1994-95 Need-Based and Non-Need-Based Grant AidAwarded To Undergraduate and Graduate/Professional School Students, By State
($ amounts in millions)
1988-89" 1991-92 1994-95Pct. Change1959 to 1991
Pct. Change1991 to 1994
Pct, Change1959 to 1994
ALABAMA $6.348 $7.311 $12.108 15.2% 65.6% 90.7%ALASKA 0.230 2.635 $2.209 1045.7% -16.2% 860.3%ARIZONA 3.526 2.283 $3.493 -35.3% 53.0% -0.9%ARKANSAS 4.600 5.465 $9.803 18.8% 79.4% 113.1%CALIFORNIA 144.214 175.525 $234.490 21.7% 33.6% 62.6%COLORADO 19.221 22.732 $33.028 18.3% 45.3% 71.8%CONNECTICUT 21.349 20.790 $20.905 -2.6% 0.6% -2.1%DELAWARE 1.291 1.287 $1.410 -0.3% 9.5% 9.2%DIST OF COLUMBIA' 1.075 1.029 $1.076 -4.3% 4.6% 0.1%FLORIDA 48.830 72.356 $99454 48.2% 37.5% 103.7%GEORGIA 19.220 19.620 116.557 2.1% 494.1% 506.4%HAWAII 0.598 0.632 0.732 5.7% 15.8% 22.4%IDAHO 0.608 0.869 1.070 42.9% 23.1% 76.0%ILLINOIS 155.778 203.707 270.322 30.8% 32.7% 73.5%INDIANA 52.062 50.838 68.162 -2.4% 34.1% 30.9%
IOWA 31.365 35.299 36.183 12.5% 2.5% 15.4%KANSAS 5.705 6.620 12.562 16.0% 89.8% 120.2%KENTUCKY 13.190 16.996 25.517 28.9% 50.1% 93.5%LOUISIANA 2.678 5.138 13.091 91.9% 154.8% 388.8%MAINE 1.411 5.002 7.090 254.5% 41.7% 402.5%MARYLAND 17.632 21.958 32.127 24.5% 4.6.3% 82.2%MASSACHUSETTS 71.468 23.940 61.945 -66.5% 158.8% -13.3%MICHIGAN 73.227 81.284 85.605 11.0% 5.3% 16.9%MINNESOTA 62.000 81.341 97.960 31.2% 20.4% 58.0%MISSISSIPPI 2.241 1.222 1.355 -45.5% 10.9% -39.5%MISSOURI 14.335 20.057 23.185 39.9% 15.6% 61.7%MONTANA 0.420 0.414 0.419 -1.4% 1.3% -0.2%NEBRASKA 1.793 2.370 2.726 32.2% 15.0% 52.0%NEVADA' 0.400 0.384 0.402 -4.0% 4.7% 0.5%NEW HAMPSHIRE 0.972 0.832 1.493 -14.4% 79.4% 53.6%NEW JERSEY 85.946 110.054 169.824 28.1% 54.3% 97.6%NEW MEXICO 8.259 7.928 14.825 -4.0% 87.0% 79.5%NEW YORK 424.105 523.434 656.545 23.4% 25.4% 54.8%NORTH CAROLINA 29.286 28.279 46.384 -3.4% 64.0% 58.4%NORTH DAKOTA 1.118 1.799 2.313 60.9% 28.6% 106.9%OHIO 72.862 81.799 124.516 12.3% 52.2% 70.9%OKLAHOMA 11.850 18.434 18.202 55.6% -1.3% 53.6%OREGON 10.616 12.023 13.761 13.3% 14.5% 29.6%PENNSYLVANIA 120.998 158.612 219.184 31.1% 38.2% 81.1%
HODE ISLAND . 9.250 9.141 6.340 -1.2% -30.6% -31.5%SOUTH CAROLINA 17.828 16.800 17.297 -5.8% 3.0% -3.0%SOUTH DAKC, TA* 0.596 0.570 0.661 -4.4% 16.0% 10.9%TENNESSEE 12.540 13.340 19.146 6.4% 43.5% 52.7%TEXAS* 24.487 30.204 31.538 23.3% 4.4% 28.8%UTAH 2.065 1.940 3 640 -6.1% 87.6% 76.3%VERMONT 9.563 11.171 14, .983 16.8% 7.3% 25.3%VIRGINIA 23.898 24.067 83.122 0.7% 245.4% 247.8%WASHINGTON 12.902 23.527 54.214 82.4% 130.4% 320.2%WEST VIRGINIA 5.228 5.781 15.854 10.6% 174.2% 203.3%WISCONSIN 36.219 43.445 60.815 20.0% 40.0% 67.9%WYOMING 0.250 0.216 0.225 -13.6% 4.2% -10.0%PUERTO RICO 17.077 17.611 22.074 3.1% 25.3% 29.3%
Totals $1,714.730 $2,030.111 $2,868.938 18.4% 41.3% 67.3%
Figures for these States are from 1993-94 Annual Survey Report.** Figures are from 1988-89 Survey Report.
Table Three
State Student Incentive Grant Program Activity By States($ amounts in millions)
1993-94SSIG Used
1994-95SSIG
Amount
1994-95Need-Based
AwardDollars Only
SSIG As APercentage of
1994-95Need-Based
Award Dollars
ALABAMA $1.083 $1.081 $2.324 47%ALASKA 0.116 0.115 $0.444 26%ARIZONA 1.221 1.220 $3493 35%ARKANSAS 0.461 0.458 $8.907 5%CALIFORNIA 11.196 11.186 $234.490 5%
COLORADO 0.994 0.988 $19.263 5%CONNECTICUT 0.954 0.943 $20.690 5%DELAWARE 0.194 0.193 $1.208 16%DIST OF COLUMBIA 0.530 0.530 $1.076 49%FLORIDA 2.281 2.274 $36.824 6%
GEORGIA 1.264 1.257 $5.147 24%HAWAII 0.259 0.284 $0.732 39%IDAHO 0.243 0.233 $aws 29%ILLINOIS 3.935 3.900 $244.352 2%INDIANA 1.456 1.448 $67.742 2%
IOWA 0.783 0.591 $35.642 2%KANSAS 0.807 0.802 $10.208 8%KENTUCKY 0.889 0.888 $25.517 3%LOUISIANA 1.021 1.025 $6.429 16%MAINE 0.261 0.257 $6.189 4%
MARYLAND 1.329 1.321 $24.833 5%MASSACHUSETTS 2.341 2.337 $61.850 4%MICHIGAN 3.010 3.004 $85.605 4%MINNESOTA 1.409 1.400 $97.920 1%MISSISSIPPI 0.616 0.613 $1248 49%
MISSOURI 1.434 1.429 $11.913 12%MONTANA 0.201 0.200 $0.419 48%NEBRASKA 0.522 0.521 $2.726 19%NEVADA' 0.197 0.197 $0.402 49%NEW HAMPSHIRE 0.254 0.252 $1425 18%
NEW JERSEY 1.910 1.906 $159.683 1%NEW MEXICO 0.370 0.368 $14.680 3%NEW YORK 6.160 6.000 $646.199 1%NORTH CAROLINA 1 540 1.533 $16.673 9%NORTH DAKOTA 0.195 0.194 $1.996 10%
OHIO 2.887 2.881 $91.225 3%OKLAHOMA 0.980 0.868 $14.961 6%OREGON 0.935 0.930 $13.761 7%PENNSYLVANIA 3.203 3.209 $218.604 1%RHODE ISLAND " 0.000 0.382 $6.340 6%
SOUTH CAROLINA 0.788 0.783 $17.297 5%SOUTH DAKOTA' 0.207 0.207 $0.589 35%TENNESSEE 1.179 1.177 $18.313 6%TEXAS' 3.975 3.975 $31.538 13%UTA i 0.539 0.538 $1.129 48%
VERMONT 0.183 0.182 $11.934 2%VIRGINIA 1.552 1.548 $55.431 3%WASHINGTON 1.653 1.317 $53.374 2%WEST VIRGINIA 0.529 0.520 $6.761 8%WISCONSIN 1.518 1.516 $49.535 3%
WYOMING 0.112 0.113 $0.225 50%PUERTO RICO 0.646 0.644 $22.074 3%
Grand Totals $72.322 $71.746 $2,472.146 3%
Figures for these States are from 1993-94 Annual Survey Report.** The Rhode Island Higher Ed Assistance Authority did not receive a Federal SSIG allotment but expended stale funds.
Note: SSIG allocations received by American Samoa. Guam, Trust Terntory and Virgin Islands not reported.
8
9
Tab
le F
our
Oth
er P
rogr
ams
Adm
inis
tere
d B
y T
he S
tate
Age
ncy
1994
-95
AlM
iropr
iado
nE
ligib
leS
tude
nts
Mer
it-B
ased
Yes
.Na
Nee
d-B
ased
Yes
_Nu
Val
ues
awar
dsN
umbe
rniA
war
ds
ALA
BA
MA
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
$246
,627
UN
DX
X$2
46,6
2750
AIA
SK
AA
lask
a S
tude
nt L
oan
Pro
gram
50,8
87,1
97U
ND
/GR
AD
XX
50,8
87,1
9712
,160
Fam
ily E
duca
tion
Loan
(F
EL)
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X94
3,45
321
3A
.W. "
Win
n" B
rindl
e M
emor
ial S
chol
arsh
ipLo
anU
ND
/GR
AD
X36
,300
5
Wha
le M
urph
y S
chol
arsh
ip L
oan
UN
D/G
RA
DX
/,5C
03
Ala
ska
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
(T
SLP
)U
ND
X1,
205,
645
209
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
32,5
00U
ND
XX
32,5
008
AR
KA
NS
AS
Em
erge
ncy
Sec
onda
ry E
duca
tion
Loan
164,
388
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X13
7,64
662
Min
ority
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
250,
000
UN
DX
X19
7,71
144
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
152,
401
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X15
2,09
033
Fac
ulty
/Adm
inis
trat
or D
evel
opm
ent P
rogr
am30
,000
GR
AD
XX
13,9
301
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
Fed
eral
Sta
fford
Loa
ns -
Sub
sidi
zed
UN
D/G
RA
DX
887,
634,
121
239,
738
Fed
eral
Sta
fford
Loa
ns -
Uns
ubsi
dize
d A
ND
Fed
eral
SLS
UN
D/G
RA
DX
876,
736,
138
144,
992
Fed
eral
PLU
SU
ND
/GR
AD
X99
,379
,740
18,9
93A
ssum
ptio
n P
rogr
am o
f Loa
ns fo
r E
duca
tion
(AP
LE)
1,60
9,00
0U
ND
IGR
AD
XX
1,60
7,36
666
1
CA
Sta
te W
ork-
Stu
dy60
7,00
0U
ND
/GR
AD
X60
7,00
0N
/AC
hild
Dev
elop
men
t Tea
cher
Loa
n A
ssum
ptio
n P
rog.
23,0
00U
ND
/GR
AD
XX
11,0
0010
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
1,93
2,00
0U
ND
/GR
AD
XX
1,93
2,00
014
8R
ober
t C. B
yrd
Hon
ors
Sch
olar
ship
1,12
7.00
0U
ND
XX
1,12
7,00
01,
499
CO
LOR
AD
OC
olor
ado
Wor
k-S
tudy
10,9
24,0
83U
ND
XX
10,8
77,4
867,
550
Nur
sing
Sch
olar
ship
220,
800
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X22
0,80
017
5
CO
NN
EC
TIC
UT
Pau
l Dou
glas
Loa
n P
rogr
am81
.909
UN
DX
81.9
0941
DE
LAW
AR
EC
hnst
a M
cAul
iffe
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
Loa
nU
ND
X16
7,55
067
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
50,0
00U
ND
X50
,000
10O
ptom
etric
Inst
itutio
nal A
idN
ursi
ng In
cent
ive
Loan
GR
AD
UN
DX X
20,0
0055
,100
529
Rob
ert C
. Byr
d H
onor
s S
chol
arsh
ip48
,000
UN
DX
48,0
0032
DIS
T O
F C
OLU
MB
IA°
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
25,0
00U
ND
X25
,000
5
Nur
ses
Tra
inin
g C
orps
Pro
gram
200,
000
UN
DX
X20
0,00
013
FLO
RID
A*C
happ
ie"
Jam
es M
ost P
rom
isin
g T
each
er L
oan
1,86
0,00
0U
ND
X1,
329,
782
(est
)33
8 (e
st)
Crit
ical
Tea
cher
Sho
rtag
e S
tude
ntLo
an F
orgi
vene
ss2,
646,
795
UN
D/G
RA
DX
2,06
4,59
077
2
Wor
k E
rene
nce
Pro
gram
599,
243
UN
D60
5,07
037
5
Occ
upat
iona
l The
rapy
/Phy
sica
l The
rapy
Loa
n60
,000
UN
DX
20,0
005
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
s67
7,91
9U
ND
/GR
AD
X63
8,80
6 (e
st)
149
(est
)
10
1994
-95
App
ropd
atIo
nE
ligib
leSt
uden
tsM
erit-
Bas
edY
esN
oN
eed-
Ras
edY
esN
oV
alue
of
Aw
ards
Num
ber
of A
war
ds
GE
OR
GIA
Ost
eopa
thic
Med
ical
Loa
n$1
00,0
00G
RA
D60
,000
6G
eorg
ia M
ilita
ry C
olle
ge S
chol
arsh
ip24
0,00
0U
ND
36,8
958
Nor
th G
eorg
ia C
olle
ge M
ilita
ry S
chol
arsh
ip59
3,60
0U
ND
542,
600
111
IDA
HO
Wor
k-S
tudy
1,10
0,00
0U
ND
1,10
0,00
01,
260
Loan
For
give
ness
108,
100
UN
D10
8,10
060
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
s72
,500
UN
D72
,500
7
ILL
INO
ISP
aul D
ougl
as T
each
er S
chol
arsh
ips
666,
891
UN
D/G
RA
D66
6,89
113
3T
each
er S
hort
gage
Sch
olar
ship
s94
5.80
0U
ND
/GR
AD
945,
800
300
Min
ority
Tea
cher
s of
Illin
ois
1,50
0,00
0U
ND
/GR
AD
1,50
0,00
030
0R
ober
t C. B
yrd
Hon
ors
Sch
olar
ship
1.00
0.00
0U
ND
1,00
0,00
056
6
IND
IAN
AS
tate
Sum
mer
Wor
k-S
tudy
667,
999
UN
D52
4,70
053
8P
aul D
ougl
as T
each
er S
chol
arsh
ips
325.
741
UN
D32
5,74
168
Rob
ert C
. Byr
d H
onor
s S
chol
arsh
ip42
6,00
0U
ND
426,
000
288
IOW
AC
olle
ge W
ork-
Stu
dy2.
698,
840
UN
D/G
RA
D28
9,88
44,
803
Ost
eopa
thic
For
giva
ble
Loan
379,
260
GR
AD
366,
000
116
Ost
eopa
thic
Sch
olar
ship
(F
orgi
vabl
e Lo
an)
110,
100
GR
AD
100,
100
6
KE
NT
UC
KY
Fed
eral
Sta
fford
Loa
n -
Sub
sidi
zed
UN
DiG
RA
D16
8,77
1,15
056
,340
Fed
eral
Sta
fford
Loa
n -
Uns
ubsi
dize
dU
ND
/GR
AD
67,7
17,5
1024
,821
Fed
eral
PLU
S L
oans
UN
D6,
083,
706
1,41
8F
eder
al S
LSU
ND
/GR
AD
364,
120
133
Fed
eral
Con
solid
atio
n Lo
ans
UN
D/G
RA
D8,
788,
388
658
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
s1,
618.
800
UN
D/G
RA
D1,
618,
800
380
KH
EA
A W
ork-
Stu
dy1,
000.
000
UN
D/G
RA
D91
5,70
01,
373
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
234,
780
UN
D23
4,78
054
LO
UIS
IAN
AF
eder
al S
taffo
rd L
oan
- S
ubsi
dize
dU
ND
/GR
AD
122,
651,
067
40,8
52F
eder
al S
taffo
rd L
oan
- U
nsub
sidi
zed
UN
D/G
RA
D38
,702
,070
13,5
25F
eder
al P
LUS
UN
D/G
RA
D7,
633,
029
1,98
4LE
O (
LA E
mpl
oym
ent O
ppor
tuni
ty L
oan)
4,72
4,00
02,
362
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
282.
500
UN
D/G
RA
D28
2,50
056
MA
RY
LA
ND
Part
-Tim
e G
rant
750.
000
UN
D75
0,00
02,
393
Lcan
Ass
ista
nce
Rep
aym
ent P
rogr
am18
3,86
0U
ND
/GR
AD
183,
860
84R
eim
burs
emen
t of F
irem
en15
5,13
5U
ND
X15
5,13
513
7P
aul D
ougl
as T
each
er S
chol
arsh
ip27
5,47
2U
ND
/GR
AD
XX
275,
472
59
MA
SSA
CH
USE
TT
SN
o In
tere
st L
oan
Pro
gram
10,0
00,0
00U
ND
10,0
00,0
005,
000
11
1994
-95
App
ropr
iatio
nE
ligib
leSt
uden
tsM
erit-
Bas
edY
esN
oN
eed-
Bas
edY
esN
oya
lue
of A
war
dsN
umbe
r of
Aw
ards
MIC
HIG
AN
Fed
eral
Fam
ily E
duca
tion
Loan
Pro
gram
UN
D/G
RA
D26
2,00
0,00
092
,000
Wor
k-S
tudy
$6.4
18,8
26U
ND
/GR
AD
6,40
0,00
06,
398
Mic
higa
n Lo
an P
rogr
amU
ND
/GR
AD
2,58
1,33
144
7
Tui
tion
Ince
ntiv
e P
rogr
am7,
972,
000
UN
D7,
972,
000
Indi
an T
uitio
n W
aive
r3.
097,
681
UN
D/G
RA
D3,
097,
681
2,59
7
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
558,
745
UN
D55
8,74
512
4
Rob
ert C
. Byr
d H
onor
s S
chol
arsh
ip72
0,00
0U
ND
720,
000
478
MIN
NE
SO
TA
Wor
k-S
tudy
8.20
0,00
0U
ND
/GR
AD
7,69
9,45
17,
500
Stu
dent
Edu
catio
nal L
oan
Fun
d (S
ELF
)B
ond
Sal
esU
ND
/GR
AD
23,0
00,0
0011
,000
MIS
SIS
SIP
PI
Psy
chol
ogy
App
rent
ices
hip
UN
D/G
RA
D11
,250
6
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
UN
D18
6,26
947
Nur
sing
Stip
end
GR
AD
86,0
009
Will
iam
Win
ter
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
Pro
gram
UN
D1,
175,
500
502
Gra
duat
e an
d P
rofe
ssio
nal D
egre
eLo
an/S
chol
arsh
ip P
rogr
amG
RA
D14
6,01
827
Sou
ther
n R
egio
nal E
duca
tion
Boa
rdLo
an/S
chol
arsh
ip P
rogr
amG
RA
D36
0,25
033
Den
tal/M
edic
al E
duca
tion
Loan
/Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
GR
AD
x19
4,00
038
Afr
ican
-Am
eric
an D
octo
ral T
each
erS
chol
arsh
ipG
RA
D65
,000
7
Mir.
...ni
ty D
octo
ral a
nd O
pera
tions
GR
AD
34,0
002
Hea
lth C
are
Pro
fess
ions
Sch
olar
ship
/Loa
nU
ND
x9,
000
6
Nur
sing
Edu
catio
n Lo
an/S
chol
arsh
ip P
rogr
amU
ND
/GR
AD
466,
207
250
Gra
duat
e T
each
erU
ND
/GR
AD
327,
750
324
MIS
SO
UR
IP
aul D
ougl
as T
each
er S
chol
arsh
ip29
5,49
5J)
295,
495
63
MO
NT
AN
AW
ork-
Stu
dy50
0,00
0N
D/G
RA
D50
0,00
0
NE
W H
AM
PS
HIR
EN
ursi
ng E
duca
tion
Ass
ista
nce
Pro
gram
30,0
00U
ND
/GR
AD
29,1
7011
0
Nur
sing
Lev
erag
ed L
oan
Pro
gram
30,0
00U
ND
28,6
0056
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
57,5
00U
ND
57,5
00
NE
W J
ER
SE
YF
eder
al S
taffo
rd L
oans
- S
ubsi
dize
dU
ND
/GR
AD
199,
780,
157
62,7
49F
eder
al S
taffo
rd L
oans
- U
nsub
sidi
zed
UN
D/G
RA
D91
,247
,622
28,8
91
Fed
eral
PLU
S L
oan
UN
D/G
RA
D31
,309
,722
5,61
7
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
403,
892
UN
D/G
RA
DX
403,
892
94
Fed
eral
SLS
Loa
nU
ND
/GR
AD
981,
96P
305
NJC
LAS
S L
oan
UN
D/G
RA
D10
,469
,92F
1,82
0 14
1994
-95
App
ropr
iatio
nE
ligib
leSt
uden
tsM
er I
t-B
ased
Yes
NO
Nee
d-B
ased
Yes
No
Val
ue o
f A
war
dsN
umbe
r ot
Aw
ards
NE
W M
EX
ICO
Wor
k-S
tudy
4,55
4,30
0U
ND
/GR
AD
XX
5,22
9,40
03,
609
Ost
eopa
thic
Stu
dent
Loa
n-fo
r-S
ervi
ce16
2,00
0G
RA
DX
X96
,000
8N
ursi
ng S
tude
nt L
oan-
for-
Ser
vice
485,
200
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X31
9,97
214
9M
edic
al S
tude
nt L
oan-
for-
Ser
vice
467,
800
GR
AD
XX
387,
383
33M
inor
ity D
octo
ral S
tude
nt L
oan-
for-
Ser
vice
200,
000
GR
AD
XX
146,
868
8A
llied
Hea
lth S
tude
nt L
oan-
tor-
Ser
vice
200,
000
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X59
,588
28T
each
er S
tude
nt L
oan-
for-
Ser
vice
238,
800
UN
DX
X11
8,66
839
NE
W Y
OR
KF
eder
al S
taffo
rd L
oan
Pro
gram
- S
ubsi
dize
dU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
1,07
6,84
6,41
831
1,08
4F
eder
al S
taffo
rd L
oan
Pro
gram
- U
nsub
sidi
zed
UN
DiG
RA
DX
X43
2,25
2,08
012
3,10
0F
eder
al P
LUS
Loa
nU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
132,
101,
346
23,4
88F
eder
al S
LSU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
27,0
91,3
438,
930
Reg
ents
Loa
n F
orgi
vene
ss P
rogr
am1,
600,
000
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X1,
441,
867
158
Reg
ents
Phy
sici
an L
oan
Rep
aym
ent P
rogr
am43
5,00
0U
ND
/GR
AD
XX
262,
500
22P
aul D
ougl
as T
each
er S
chol
arsh
ip87
2,00
0U
ND
XX
872,
000
181
Rob
ert C
. Byr
d H
onor
s S
chol
arsh
ip1,
168,
000
UN
DX
X1,
168,
000
782
OH
IOF
eder
al S
taffo
rd L
oan
Pro
gram
- S
ubsi
dize
dU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
300,
000,
000
100,
000
Fed
eral
Sta
fford
Loa
n P
rogr
am -
Uns
ubsi
dize
dU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
110,
000,
000
35,0
00F
eder
al P
LUS
Loa
nU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
35,0
00,0
007,
000
Con
solid
atio
n Lo
an P
rogr
amU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
1,00
0,00
010
0T
each
er E
duca
tion
Loan
UN
DX
X21
,000
8I
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
731,
994
XX
731,
994
150
Nur
se E
duca
tion
Ass
ista
nce
Loan
Pro
gram
(N
EA
LP)
277,
359
UN
DX
X27
7,35
996
00R
ober
t C. B
yrd
Hon
ors
Sch
olar
ship
415,
000
UN
DX
X41
5,00
027
7I
Phy
sici
ans
Loan
Rep
aym
ent P
rogr
am70
0,00
0G
RA
DX
X16
8,00
05
OK
LA
HO
MA
Fed
eral
Sub
sidi
zed
Sta
fford
Loa
nU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
172,
073,
918
60,6
25F
eder
al U
nsub
sidi
zed
Sta
fford
Loa
nU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
83,8
29,3
9629
,610
Sta
te R
egen
ts F
ee W
aive
rU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
31,0
00,0
0031
,000
Fed
eral
PLU
S/S
LSU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
10,6
99,8
322,
451
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
195,
894
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X20
1,50
044
OR
EG
ON
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n C
omm
unity
Ser
vice
Vou
cher
50,0
00U
ND
XX
25,3
7528
Nur
sing
Loa
nR
ura
l Hea
lth S
ervi
ces
Loan
Rep
aym
ent
350
, 000
400,
000
UN
DG
RA
DX X
XX
198,
835
395,
830
53 15
1
1994
-95
Mer
it-B
ased
Nee
d-B
ased
llyst
rost
riatim
iS
tude
nts
Yes
Be
Yes
No
Val
ue_o
f Aw
ards
Num
ber
otA
war
ds
PE
NN
SY
LVA
MA
Fed
eral
Sta
fford
Loa
n -
Sub
sidi
zed
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X1,
213,
451,
857
365,
188
Fed
eral
Sta
fford
Loa
n -
Uns
ubsi
dize
dU
ND
/GR
AD
X58
9,25
4,58
516
2,24
0
Fed
eral
PLU
S L
oans
UN
D/G
RA
DX
94,6
50,3
2520
,683
Con
solid
atio
nU
ND
/GR
AD
X34
2,29
1,50
717
,574
Inst
itutio
nal A
ssis
tanc
e G
rant
s35
,077
,000
UN
D35
,077
,000
37,9
39 F
TE
Mat
chin
g F
unds
/Wor
k-S
tudy
Pro
gram
6,34
1,00
0U
ND
/GR
AD
XX
6,09
1,00
047
,552
ITE
C (
Tui
tion)
1,20
0,00
0G
RA
DX
1,20
0,00
0N
/A
Hea
lth E
duca
tion
Ass
ista
nce
Loan
GR
AD
XX
$20,
000,
000
2,00
0E
arly
Chi
ldho
od L
oan
For
give
ness
Pro
gram
300,
000
X30
0,00
015
0
Urb
an/R
ural
Loa
n F
orgi
vene
ss5,
010,
000
X5,
010,
000
2,50
0Lo
an F
orgi
vene
ssX
315,
000
150
Agr
icul
ture
Loa
n F
orgi
vene
ss63
,000
X63
,000
106
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
636,
000
UN
DX
636,
000
118
Rob
ert C
. Byr
d H
onor
s S
chol
arsh
ip81
9,00
0U
ND
X81
9,00
054
6
RH
OD
E IS
IAN
DC
onso
lidat
edU
ND
3,67
5,72
224
2In
tern
Pro
gram
10,0
00U
ND
/GR
AD
200,
000
300
Wor
k O
ppor
tuni
ty P
rogr
am40
4,70
0U
ND
404,
700
850
Fed
eral
Sta
fford
Loa
n P
rogr
am -
Sub
sidi
zed
UN
D/G
RA
D75
,274
,069
23,8
54F
eder
al S
taffo
rd L
oan
Pro
gram
- U
nsub
sidi
zed
UN
D/G
RA
D18
,399
,861
6,10
7F
eder
al P
LUS
/SLS
UN
D/G
RA
D32
,010
,140
6,96
0C
omm
unity
Ser
vice
Pro
gram
376,
200
UN
D37
6,20
017
1
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
50,6
38X
50,6
3811
SO
UT
H D
AK
OT
A'
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
46,7
86U
ND
46,7
8615
Rob
ert C
. Byr
d H
onor
s S
chol
arsh
ip30
,000
UN
D30
,000
20N
atio
nal G
uard
Tut
ition
Ass
ista
nce
64,7
47U
ND
64,0
0075
TE
NN
ES
SE
ET
each
er L
oan
Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
for
Dis
adva
ntag
ed A
reas
UN
D/G
RA
D27
,750
20F
eder
al S
taffo
rd L
oan
UN
D/G
RA
DX
275,
168,
733
90,3
57F
eder
al P
LUS
UN
D10
,291
,412
2,11
4T
each
er L
oan
Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
UN
D/G
RA
D31
2,19
716
0M
inor
ity T
each
ing
Fel
low
sU
ND
308,
175
64T
each
er C
orps
Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
UN
D/G
RA
D26
0,00
055
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
$335
,626
UN
D$3
35,6
2670
Rob
ert C
. Byr
d H
onor
s S
chol
arsh
ip$3
50,5
94U
ND
$350
,594
238
TE
XA
S*
Hin
son-
Haz
lew
ood
Loan
Pro
gram
Bon
d S
ale
Fun
dsU
ND
/GR
AD
87,4
00,0
0013
,631
Col
lege
Wor
k-S
tudy
2,00
0,00
0U
ND
/GR
AD
2,80
0,00
03,
771
Pub
lic E
duca
tiona
l Gra
nt (
on c
ampu
s)37
,705
,065
UN
D/G
RA
D38
,000
,000
58,0
00G
ood
Nei
ghbo
r S
chol
arsh
ip P
rogr
am90
4,26
7U
ND
/GR
AD
Bay
lor
Med
ical
Sch
olar
ship
31,7
23,4
19G
RA
D31
,723
,419
N/A
Bay
lor
Den
tal S
chol
arsh
ip13
,344
,477
GR
AD
13,3
44,4
77N
/AP
aul D
ougl
as T
each
er S
chol
arsh
ip1,
000,
000
1,00
0,00
031
8R
ober
t C. B
yrd
Hon
ors
Sch
olar
ship
649,
500
UN
D
1PM
18
1994
-95
ElI
gibl
eM
erit-
Bas
edN
eed-
Bas
edA
ppro
pria
tion
Stud
ents
Yes
No
Yes
NO
Van
olA
war
dsN
umbe
r of
Aw
ards
UT
AH
Fed
eral
PLU
SU
ND
XX
3,77
3,92
978
6F
eder
al S
taffo
rd S
tude
nt L
oan
- S
ubsi
dize
dU
ND
/GR
AD
XX
129,
666,
067
37,4
24F
eder
al S
taffo
rd S
tude
nt L
oan
- U
nsub
sidi
zed
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X39
,823
,165
11,9
29
VE
RM
ON
TS
tude
nt E
mpl
oym
ent P
rogr
am12
5,00
0U
ND
XX
125,
000
200
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
30,0
00U
ND
X30
,000
VIR
GIN
IAD
a., D
ouga
s T
each
er S
chol
arsh
ip38
2,50
0U
ND
XX
382,
500
62
WA
SHIN
GT
ON
Sta
te W
ork-
Stu
dy12
,457
.066
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X12
,444
,121
8,15
0H
ealth
Pro
fess
ion
Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
780,
000
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X74
1,18
599
WIC
HE
215,
500
GR
AD
XX
146,
000
20F
utur
e T
each
er C
ondi
tiona
l Sch
olar
ship
269,
500
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X26
9,50
095
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
305.
867
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X30
4,94
468
WE
ST V
IRG
INIA
Med
ical
Stu
dent
Loa
n P
rogr
am73
0,63
4G
RA
DX
X85
2,82
923
1P
aul D
ougl
as T
each
er S
chol
arsh
ip10
1.29
4U
ND
X10
1,29
421
Rob
ert C
. Byr
d H
onor
s S
chol
arsh
ip13
3,50
0U
ND
X13
3,50
089
WIS
CO
NSI
NI
Nur
sing
Stu
dent
Stip
end
Loan
333,
000
UN
D/G
RA
DX
X33
3,00
024
21-
-,In
depe
nden
t Stu
dent
Aw
ard
200.
000
UN
DX
X20
0,00
016
50
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
256.
266
UN
DX
256,
266
PUE
RT
O R
ICO
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
266,
848
UN
DX
X73
,878
19
Fig
ures
for
thes
e S
tate
s ar
e fr
om 1
993-
94 A
nnua
l Sur
vey
Rep
ort.
20
Tab
le F
ive
Sele
cted
Pro
gram
Cha
ract
eris
tics,
199
4-95
Nee
d A
naly
sis
UM
=U
nifo
rna
Met
hodo
logy
U=
Mod
ifle
d U
MD
emon
stra
teFM
=Fe
dera
l Met
hodo
logy
Aca
dem
ic M
erit
F=M
odif
led
FMT
o R
ecei
veI=
Inst
ftut
ions
Cho
ose
Initi
al A
war
dPr
ogra
m A
dmin
istr
atio
nM
axim
um A
war
dS=
Stat
e Sy
stem
INT
esC
=C
entr
aliz
ed
Sta
te/P
rogr
amT
ear
Initi
ated
1994
-95
G=
GA
IWA
SN
=N
oD
FDec
entr
alix
ed
AIA
BA
MA
Stu
dent
Ass
ista
nce
Pro
gram
1976
$2,5
00F
M
Pau
l Dou
glas
Tea
cher
Sch
ol.
1992
$2,5
00F
M
Chi
ropr
actic
Sch
olar
ship
s19
85$5
,000
FM
MA
SK
AS
tate
Edu
catio
nal I
ncen
tive
Gra
nt$1
,500
FM
AR
IZO
NA
Ince
ntiv
e G
rant
Pro
gram
1977
$2,5
00F
M
AR
KA
NS
AS
Stu
dent
Ass
ista
nce
Gra
nt19
77$6
24F
M
Aca
dem
ic C
halle
nge
1991
$1,0
00
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
Cal
Gra
nt A
1956
$5,2
50F
M
Cal
Gra
nt B
1969
$6,6
60F
M
Cal
Gra
nt C
1973
$2,8
90F
M
Law
Enf
orce
men
t Per
sonn
el19
70$1
,500
Gra
duat
e F
ello
wsh
ip19
66$6
,490
FM
CO
LOR
AD
OS
tude
nt In
cent
ive
Gra
nt19
77$5
,000
FM
Stu
dent
Gra
nt19
71$5
,000
FM
Ext
ende
d S
tudi
es G
rant
1982
Tui
tion
& F
ees
FM
Par
t-T
ime
Gra
nt19
91T
uitio
n &
Fee
sF
M
Gra
duat
e G
rant
1971
$5,0
00F
M
CO
NN
EC
TIC
UT
Sch
olas
tic A
chie
vem
ent G
rant
1980
$2,0
00F
M
Inde
pend
ent C
olle
ge G
rant
1972
$7,0
00F
M
Aid
for
Pub
lic C
olle
ge G
rant
1986
Unm
et N
eed
FM
2122
Nee
d A
naly
sis
UM
=U
nifo
rm M
etho
dolo
gyU
=M
odifl
ed U
MD
emon
stra
teF
M=
Fed
eral
Met
hodo
logy
Aca
dem
ic M
erit
F=
Mod
lfied
FM
l= in
stitu
tions
Cho
ose
To
Rec
eive
Initi
al A
war
dPr
ogra
m A
dmin
istr
atio
nM
axim
umA
war
dS
=S
tate
Sys
tem
Y=
Yes
C=
Cen
tral
ixed
Stat
e/Pr
ogra
mY
ear
Initi
ated
1994
-95
G=
GA
PS
EA
SN
=N
oD
=D
ecen
tral
ixed
DE
IAW
AR
EP
osts
econ
dary
Sch
olar
ship
1978
$1,0
00F
MW
orkf
orce
Dev
elop
men
t Gra
nt19
91$1
,000
DIS
TR
ICT
OF
CO
LU
MB
IA'
Ince
ntiv
e G
rant
s19
76$1
,500
FM
,G
FLO
RID
AS
tude
nt A
ssis
tanc
e G
rant
s19
72$1
,500
FM
Jose
Mar
ti S
chol
arsh
ip19
86$2
,000
FM
Mar
y M
cLeo
d B
ethu
ne S
chol
.19
90$3
,000
FM
Ros
ewoo
d F
amily
Sch
ol.
1994
$4,0
00F
MS
emin
ole
& M
icco
suke
e In
dian
1982
Up
to c
ost o
f edu
c.F
M
GE
OR
GIA
Stu
dent
Ince
ntiv
e G
rant
1974
-75
$5,0
00F
M
HA
WA
IIS
SIG
1977
$5,0
00F
M
IDA
HO
SS
IG19
74$5
,000
FM
Min
ority
& "
At R
isk"
ILL
INO
ISM
onet
ary
Aw
ard
Pro
gram
1959
$3,8
00S
tude
nt to
Stu
dent
1972
$1,0
00
IND
IAN
AF
reed
om o
f Cho
ice
Aw
ards
1976
$4,1
06F
M21
st C
entu
ry S
chol
ars
Pro
gram
1991
Pub
lic T
uitio
n
Min
ority
/Spe
cial
Edu
catio
n T
each
er S
ervi
ces
1988
$4,0
00 m
inor
ity te
ache
r$1
,000
spe
cial
ed.
Nur
sing
Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
1990
$5,0
00C
ontr
act f
or S
pace
Pro
gram
1988
$1,9
80F
M
2 4
Nee
d A
naly
sis
UM
=U
nifo
nn M
etho
dolo
gyU
=M
oditi
ed U
MD
emon
stra
teFM
=Fe
dera
l Met
hodo
logy
Aca
dem
ic M
erit
F=M
atill
ied
FMT
o R
ecei
veI=
Inst
itutio
ns C
hooa
eIn
itial
Aw
ard
Prog
ram
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Max
imum
Aw
ard
S=St
ate
Syst
emT
=Y
esC
=C
entr
alix
edS
tate
ftrog
ram
Yea
rinI
tiale
d.1
.994
--91
G=
GA
PSFA
SN
EN
°11
1-tO
ccen
tinsl
Ized
IOW
AT
uitio
n G
rant
1969
$2,9
00F
MV
oc-T
ech
Gra
nt19
73$6
00F
MIo
wa
Gra
nt19
90$1
,000
FM
KA
NSA
ST
uitio
n G
rant
1972
$1,7
00F
M
KE
NT
UC
KY
Col
lege
Acc
ess
Pro
gram
1990
-91
$960
FM
Tui
tion
Gra
nt19
75-7
6$1
,200
LO
UIS
IAN
AS
SIG
1975
-76
$2,0
00T
uitio
n A
ssis
tanc
e P
lan
1989
-90
$2,6
25
MA
INE
Stu
dent
Ince
ntiv
e S
chol
arsh
ip$1
,000
FM
Hea
lth P
rofe
ssio
n Lo
an P
rogr
am
MA
RY
LA
ND
Gen
eral
Sta
te19
61$2
,500
Tol
bert
Gra
nt19
85$1
,500
FM
Sen
ator
ial
1970
$2,0
00F
MP
rofe
ssio
nal
$1,0
00F
M
Nur
sing
Liv
ing
Exp
ense
s$2
,400
FM
MA
SSA
CH
USE
TT
SG
ener
al S
chol
arsh
ip19
57$2
,500
FM
Gilb
ert M
atch
ing
Gra
nt19
78$2
,500
FM
Mas
s. C
ash
Gra
nt/T
uitio
n W
aive
rT
uitio
nF
M
Her
ter
Sch
olar
ship
Tui
tion
& F
ees
FM
MIC
HIG
AN
Com
petit
ive
Sch
olar
ship
s19
64$1
,200
Tui
tion
Gra
nt19
66$1
,975
Adu
lt P
art-
Tim
e19
86-8
7$6
00F
M
Mic
higa
n E
duca
tiona
l Opp
ortu
nity
Gra
nt19
86-8
7$1
,000
FM
26
Nee
d A
naly
sis
UM
=U
nifo
rm M
etho
dolo
gyU
=M
odill
ed U
MD
emon
stra
teFM
=Fe
dera
l Met
hodo
logy
Aca
dem
ic M
erit
F=M
odif
led
FMT
o R
ecei
veI=
Inst
itutio
ns C
hoos
eIn
itial
Aw
ard
Prog
ram
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Max
imum
Aw
ard
S=St
ate
Syst
emY
=Y
esC
=C
entr
alix
edS
tate
/Pro
gram
Yea
r In
itiat
ed19
94-9
5G
.F.G
AIP
SFA
SN
:41N
oU
FIle
cent
raliz
ed
MIN
NE
SO
TA
Sta
te G
rant
1968
$5,8
90F
MC
& D
Non
-AF
DC
Chi
ld C
are
Gra
nt19
90$1
,500
FM
Nur
sina
Gra
nt fo
r P
erso
ns o
f Col
or19
93$4
,000
FM
MIS
SIS
SIP
PI
SS
IG19
75$1
,500
FM
,UM
.G,1
MIS
SO
UR
IS
tude
nt G
rant
Pro
gram
1973
$1,5
00F
MR
oss-
Bar
nett
Mem
oria
l Sch
olar
ship
1994
$1,1
11F
M
MO
NT
AN
AS
SIG
1976
$900
FM
NE
BR
AS
KA
Sch
olar
ship
Ass
ista
nce
Pro
gram
1989
-90
Var
ies
by In
st.
FM
Sta
te S
chol
arsh
ip A
war
d P
rogr
am19
89-9
0$5
.000
FM
Pos
tsec
onda
ry E
duc.
Aw
ard
Pro
gram
1991
-92
Var
ies
by In
st.
FM
NE
W H
AM
PS
HIR
EIn
cent
ive
Pro
gram
1976
$1,0
00F
MLe
vera
ged
Ince
ntiv
e G
rant
1987
N/A
N/A
NE
VA
DA
'S
tude
nt In
cent
ive
Gra
nts
1977
$5,0
00F
M
NE
W J
ER
SE
YT
uitio
n A
id G
rant
1978
$5,2
10P
art-
Tim
e T
AG
/EO
F19
88$3
,908
UG
Edu
catio
nal O
ppor
unity
Fun
d19
68$1
,950
NE
W M
EX
ICO
NM
Sch
olar
sT
uitio
n, F
ees,
Boo
ksF
MS
tude
nt In
cent
ive
Gra
nt$2
,000
FM
Chi
ldca
re G
rant
sN
o M
axim
umF
MS
tude
nt C
hoic
e$6
,093
FM
3% S
chol
arsh
ips
Var
ies
FM
Gra
duat
e S
chol
arsh
ips
$7,2
00F
MG
radu
ate
Res
earc
h$5
00F
M
NE
W Y
OR
KT
uitio
n A
ssis
tanc
e P
rogr
am19
74$4
,050
Aid
for
Par
t-T
ime
Stu
dy19
84$2
,000
28
Nee
d A
naly
sis
UM
:Uni
form
Met
hodo
logy
Us
Mod
ifie
d U
MD
ento
nst:t
late
FA &
Fede
ral M
etho
dolo
gyA
cade
mic
Mer
itPs
Mod
ifie
d FM
To
Rec
eive
I=In
stitu
dons
Cho
ose
Initi
al A
war
dPr
ogra
m A
dmin
istr
atio
nM
axim
um A
war
dS=
Stat
e Sy
stem
Wif
e'C
=C
entr
alis
edSt
ate/
Prog
ram
Yea
rini
tiata
ll_L
994-
_94
G=
GA
PSFA
SN
EN
°11
-A)x
cent
ralis
ed
NO
RT
H C
AR
OL
INA
*S
tude
nt In
cent
ive
Gra
nt19
75$1
,500
FMB
oard
of G
over
nor's
Med
ical
Sch
olar
ship
s19
74$2
3,80
0FM
,GL
egis
lativ
e T
uitio
n G
rant
s19
75$1
,150
Boa
rd o
f Gov
erno
r's D
enta
l Sch
olar
ship
s19
78$1
0,50
0FM
Sta
te C
ontr
actu
al S
chol
arsh
ips
1971
Cos
t of
Edu
catio
nFM
NO
RT
H D
AK
OT
AS
tate
Stu
dent
Ince
ntiv
e G
rant
1973
600
FM
OH
IOIn
stru
ctio
nal G
rant
1970
$3,7
50P
art-
Tim
e S
tude
nt In
stru
ctio
nal G
rant
1993
$3,7
50
OK
LA
HO
MA
Tui
tion
Aid
Gra
nt19
74$1
,000
Will
iam
P. W
illis
Sch
olar
ship
1986
$2,4
00
OR
EG
ON
Nee
d G
rant
1971
$1,4
70
PEN
NSY
LV
AN
IAS
tate
Gra
nt P
rogr
am19
66$2
,600
PO
W/M
IA D
epen
dent
s G
rant
Pro
gram
1972
$1,2
00 '
RH
OD
E I
SLA
ND
Sch
olar
ship
& G
rant
Pro
gram
1978
$900
FM
SOU
TH
CA
RO
LIN
AT
uitio
n G
rant
s19
70$3
,260
SOU
TH
DA
KO
TA
*S
tude
nt In
cent
ive
Gra
nts
1974
$600
Tui
tion
Equ
aliz
atio
n G
rant
s19
78$3
00S
uper
ior
Sch
olar
Sch
olar
ship
1984
$1,5
00
3029
Nee
d A
naly
sis
UM
=U
nlio
rm M
etho
dolo
gyU
=M
odill
ed U
MD
emon
stra
teFM
=Fe
dera
l Met
hodo
logy
Aca
dem
ic M
erit
F=M
odill
ed F
MT
o R
ecei
veI=
Inst
itutio
ns C
hoos
eIn
itial
Aw
ard
Prog
ram
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Max
imum
Aw
ard
S=St
ate
Syst
emY
efes
C=
Cen
tral
ised
Stat
e/Pr
ogra
mY
eari
nitia
ted
1994
-95
Cet
GA
' SPS
FAS
INFI
Ne
DsD
scei
MU
ldix
ed
TE
NN
ES
SE
ET
enne
ssee
Stu
dent
Ass
ista
nce
Aw
ard
(TS
AA
).19
76$1
,482
FM
TS
AA
- R
esto
ratio
n A
ct19
93$8
88F
M
TE
XA
S'
Tui
tion
Equ
aliz
atio
n G
rant
s19
71$3
,684
FM
,GP
ublic
Edu
catio
nal S
SIG
Pro
gram
1975
$2,5
00F
M,G
Sta
te S
chol
arsh
ip P
rogr
am fo
r E
thni
c R
ecru
itmr
1981
$1,0
00F
M,G
Tax
Rei
mbu
rsem
ent G
rant
s19
85$2
,500
FM
,GN
ursi
ng S
chol
arsh
ips
1990
$3,0
00F
M,G
UT
AH
Sta
te S
tude
nt In
cent
ive
Gra
nt19
74-7
5$2
,500
FM
VE
RM
ON
TIn
cent
ive
Gra
nt P
rogr
am19
65$5
,200
Par
t-T
ime
Gra
nt19
81$3
,900
Non
-Deg
ree
Gra
nt19
85$3
30
VIR
GIN
IAC
olle
ge S
chol
arsh
ip A
ssis
tanc
e P
rogr
am19
73$5
,000
FM
Last
Dol
lar
Pro
gram
1988
$4,5
00F
M
Dis
cret
iona
ry A
id P
rogr
am19
81$1
2,00
0 (G
RA
D)
$4,5
00 (
UG
)F
M
Virg
inia
Tra
nsfe
r G
rant
Pro
gram
1983
$4,5
00F
MV
irgin
ia G
uara
ntee
d A
ssis
tanc
e P
rogr
am19
94$2
,500
FM
WA
SHIN
GT
ON
Sta
te N
eed
Gra
nt19
70$2
,740
Edu
catio
n O
ppor
tuni
ty G
rant
1990
-91
$2,5
00F
MA
m. I
ndia
n E
ndow
ed S
chol
arsh
ip19
93$1
,000
FM
Aid
to B
lind
Stu
dent
s19
74$6
00F
M
31
3`1
Nee
d A
naly
sis
UM
=U
nifo
rm M
etho
dolo
gyU
=M
odill
ed U
MD
emon
stra
teFM
=Fe
dera
l Met
hodo
logy
Aca
dem
ic M
erit
F=M
odif
ied
FMT
o R
ecei
veI=
Inst
itutio
ns C
hoos
eIn
itial
Aw
ard
Prog
ram
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Max
imum
Aw
ard
S=St
ate
Syst
emY
=Y
esC
=C
entr
aliz
edSt
ate/
Prog
ram
Yea
r...I
nitia
ted
.19,
4-95
GA
PSFA
SN
=N
oD
=D
ecen
tral
ized
WE
ST V
IRG
INIA
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n G
rant
Pro
gram
1968
$1,9
44F
M
WIS
CO
NSI
NH
ighe
r E
duca
tion
Gra
nt19
65$1
,800
FM
Tui
tion
Gra
nt19
65$2
,172
FM
Tal
ent I
ncen
tive
Gra
nt19
75$1
,800
Indi
an S
tude
nt G
rant
1978
$2,2
00F
M
WY
OM
ING
SS
IGF
M
PUE
RT
O R
ICO
SS
IG19
76$1
,500
FM
Edu
catio
nal F
unds
1969
N/A
Legi
slat
ive
Gra
nt19
55N
/AS
uppl
emen
tary
Aid
Pro
gram
1981
$600
Fig
ures
for
thes
e S
tate
s ar
e fr
om 1
993-
94 A
nnua
l Sur
vey
Rep
ort.
3ty
3Lj
Tab
le S
ix
1994
-95
Num
ber
and
Perc
ent o
f A
war
ds a
nd D
olla
rs b
y Se
ctor
For
Com
preh
ensi
ve U
nder
grad
uate
Nee
d-B
ased
Sch
olar
ship
and
Gra
nt P
rogr
ams
ALA
BA
MA
AL
Stu
dent
Ass
ista
nce
Pro
gram
Dou
glas
Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
ALA
SK
AS
tate
Edu
catio
nal I
ncen
tive
Gra
nt
AR
IZO
NA
Sta
te S
tude
nt In
cent
ive
Gra
nt
AR
KA
NS
AS
Stu
dent
Ass
ista
nce
Gra
ntA
cade
mic
Cha
lleng
e
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
Cal
Gra
nt A
Cal
Gra
nt B
Cal
Gra
nt C
Law
Enf
orce
men
t Dep
ende
nts
IG
radu
ate
Fel
low
ship
I-'
CO
LOR
AD
OC
OS
tate
Ince
ntiv
e G
rant
1S
tude
nt G
rant
Par
t-T
ime
Gra
nt
CO
NN
EC
TIC
UT
Sch
olas
tic A
chie
vem
ent
Inde
pend
ent C
olle
ge G
rant
Aid
for
Pub
lic C
olle
ge
DE
LAW
AR
EP
osts
econ
dary
Sch
olar
ship
Wor
kfor
ce D
evel
opm
ent
FLO
RID
AP
ublic
Stu
dent
Ass
ista
nce
Gra
ntJo
se M
arti
Sch
olar
ship
Cha
lleng
e G
ran
Mar
y M
cLeo
d B
ethu
ne S
chol
arsh
ipR
osew
ood
Fam
ily S
chol
arsh
ipS
emin
ole
8 M
icco
suke
e In
dian
Sch
olar
GE
OR
GIA
Stu
dent
Ince
ntiv
e G
rant
HA
WA
IIS
SIG
IDA
HO
SS
IG
0rIL
LIN
OIS
0 li
Mon
etar
y A
war
d P
rogr
amS
tude
nt to
Stu
dent
Gra
nt
Val
ue o
f Aw
ards
Perc
ent
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.00
%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
00.0
0°°°
%k
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.00
%
0.00
%
0.00
%
0.00
%0.
00%
At I
n-St
ate
PubU
cIn
stitu
tions
Perc
ent
5,12
987
.00%
4080
.00%
N/A
5,25
296
.70%
7,11
687
.90%
N/A
30,4
7968
.30%
30,9
6694
.60%
2,00
076
.80%
1173
.00%
387
60.3
0%
1,53
693
.00%
14,6
2086
.00%
1,06
385
.00%
1.19
642
.00%
00.
00%
5,10
0 10
0.00
%
1,09
081
.00%
145
72.0
0%
30,5
9910
0.00
%40
60.0
0%0
0.00
%25
100
.00%
2578
.10%
9,02
885
.00%
N/A
74.0
0%
1,81
596
.00%
88,6
7169
.70%
4,60
0 10
0.00
%
Num
ber
of A
war
ds-
Min
-Sta
teA
tPr
ivat
eO
nt-o
l-St
ate
Inst
itutio
nsPe
rcen
tIn
stitu
tions
766
13.0
0%0
1020
.00%
0
NIA
N/A
179
3.30
%0
979
12.1
0%0
N/A
N/A
14,1
4731
.70%
01.
767
5.40
%0
604
23.2
0%0
427
.00%
025
539
.70%
0
116
7.00
%0
2,38
014
.00%
018
815
.00%
0
1,65
158
.00%
03,
780
100.
00%
00
0.00
%0
256
19.0
0%0
5728
.00%
0
00.
00%
026
40.0
0%0
86 1
00.0
0%0
00.
00%
07
21.9
0%0
1,59
315
.03%
0
N/A
26.0
0%N
/A
764.
00%
0
38,5
4730
.30%
00
0.00
%0
Perc
ent
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.00
%
00.0
0;0*
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.00
%
0.00
%
0.00
%0.
00%
At I
n-St
ate
Publ
icIn
stitu
tions
Perc
ent
$1,9
90,9
1587
.27%
$196
,636
79.7
3%
$326
,596
73.5
0%
$3,3
25,3
8095
.20%
$3,5
40,2
5488
.80%
$4,1
37,5
6184
.10%
$84,
727,
066
54.2
0%$6
5,00
7,34
388
.30%
$809
,118
38.5
0%$1
0,05
464
.60%
$536
,328
23.4
0%
$1,8
99,4
1292
.00%
$13,
308,
713
86.0
0%$6
22,5
0083
.00%
$1,4
26,1
8849
.00%
$00.
00%
$5,6
00,0
00 1
00.0
0%
$827
,781
76.4
0%$8
9,37
371
.70%
$27,
102,
807
100.
00%
$73,
800
60.0
0%$0
0.00
%$3
4,37
7 10
0.00
%$1
7,48
456
.40%
$4,0
14,6
7478
.00%
$409
,988
56.0
0%
$649
,390
93.0
0%
$124
,635
,789
52.0
0%$1
,437
,378
100
.00%
At I
n-St
ate
Priv
ate
Inst
itutio
nsPe
rcen
t
$290
,413
12.7
3%$4
9,99
120
.27%
$117
,752
26.5
0%
$167
,666
4.80
%
$446
,518
11.2
0%$7
82,2
5015
.90%
$71,
595,
934
45.8
0%$8
,613
,657
11.7
0%$1
,292
,487
61.5
0%$5
,509
35.4
0%$1
,755
,672
76.6
0%
$99,
969
8.00
%$2
,166
,535
14.0
0%$1
27,5
0017
.00%
$1,4
84,4
0051
.00%
$12,
055,
530
100.
00%
$00.
00%
$255
,702
23.6
0%$3
5,27
628
.30%
$00.
00%
$49,
200
40.0
0%$2
50,5
00 1
00.0
0%$0
0.00
%$1
3,51
643
.60%
$1,1
32,3
4422
.00%
$322
,134
44.0
0%
$48,
878
7.00
%
$115
,048
,421
48.0
0%S
O0.
00%
At O
ut-o
f-St
ate
Inst
itutio
ns
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0
36
IND
IAN
AH
ighe
r E
duca
tion
Aw
ard
Fre
edom
of
Cho
ice
Gra
nts
Min
ority
Tea
cher
& S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Tea
cher
Ser
vice
s S
chol
arsh
ipN
ursi
ng S
chol
arsh
ip P
rogr
amC
ontr
act f
or S
pace
Pro
gram
IOW
AIo
wa
Tui
tion
Gra
ntV
ocat
iona
l-Tec
hnic
al T
uitio
n G
rant
Iow
a G
rant
KA
NS
AS
Tui
tion
Gra
ntW
ashb
urn
Tui
tion
Gra
ntR
egen
ts S
uppl
emen
tal
Sta
te S
chol
arsh
ipE
thni
c M
inon
tyO
steo
path
ic
KE
NT
UC
KY
Col
lege
Acc
ess
(CA
P)
Pro
gram
Ken
tuck
y T
uitio
n G
rant
ILO
UIS
IAN
ALA
Tui
tion
Ass
ista
nce
Pla
nI-
,LA
SS
IGk.
0 iM
AIN
ES
tude
nt In
cent
ive
Sch
olar
ship
MA
RY
LAN
DG
ener
al S
tate
Jack
F T
olbe
rt G
rant
Sen
ator
ial S
chol
arsh
ips
Pro
fess
iona
l Sch
olar
ship
Nu
'sin
g Li
ving
Exp
ense
s G
rant
MA
SS
AC
HU
SE
TT
SG
ener
al S
chol
arsh
ipG
ilber
t Mat
chin
g G
rant
Mas
s C
ash
Gra
m-T
uitio
n W
aive
rH
erte
r S
chol
arsh
ip
MIC
HIG
AN
Com
petit
ive
Sch
olar
ship
sT
utio
n G
rant
Adu
lt P
art-
Tim
eM
ichi
gan
Edu
catio
nal O
ppor
tuni
ty G
ran
MIN
NE
SO
TA
Min
neso
ta S
tate
Gra
nt P
rogr
amN
on-A
FD
C C
hild
Car
eN
ursi
ng G
rant
for
Per
sons
of C
olor
MIS
SIS
SIP
PI
SS
IG
MIS
SO
UR
IS
tude
nt G
rant
Pro
gram
Ros
s B
arne
tt M
emor
ial
37
Num
ber
otA
war
ds--
Val
ue o
f Aw
ards
Alia
-2S
tate
Pub
licin
stitu
tions
Per
cent
Ann
-Sla
teP
rivat
ela
rtitu
tiona
Per
cent
atO
nt-a
tTS
tate
inst
itutio
nsP
erce
nt
AtIn
-Sta
teP
ublic
listit
ntio
nsP
erce
nt
Alla
-Sta
teP
rivat
eIn
stitu
tions
Per
cent
At O
ur-o
f-S
tate
Inst
itutio
nsP
erce
nt
28,1
6773
.00%
10,3
99 .2
6.95
%19
0.05
%$3
0,33
9,54
653
.00%
$26,
876,
258
46.9
5%$2
8,62
20.
05%
291
84.0
0%55
16.0
0%o
0.00
%$2
62,9
0974
.00%
$92.
374
26.0
0%$0
0.00
%52
578
.00%
148
' 22.
00%
00.
00%
$314
,120
82.0
0%$6
8,95
318
.00%
$00.
00%
369
100.
00%
00.
00%
00.
00%
$511
,600
100.
00%
$00.
00%
$00.
00%
00.
00%
14,4
53 1
00.0
0%o
0.00
%$0
0%$3
2,29
3,99
110
0.00
%$0
0.00
%4,
300
100.
00%
00.
00%
00.
00%
$1,7
64,4
4710
0.00
%$0
0.00
%$0
0.00
%1,
191
62.6
0%71
137
.40%
00.
00%
$996
,200
62.9
0%$5
87,5
8437
.10%
$00.
00%
2,15
859
.00%
1,50
041
.00%
00.
00%
$2,9
78,2
1053
.00%
$2.6
41,0
5347
.00%
$00.
00%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
17,7
3783
.00%
3,63
317
.00%
00.
00%
$14,
289,
861
83.0
0%$2
,926
,839
17.0
0%S
O0.
00%
00.
00%
1,20
0 10
0.00
%0
0.00
%$0
0.00
%$8
,300
,145
100.
00%
SO
0.00
%
2,10
110
0.00
%0
0.00
%0
0.00
%$4
,379
,408
100.
00%
$00.
00%
$00.
00%
3,18
788
.00%
435
12.0
0%o
0.00
%$1
,741
,968
85.0
0%$3
07,4
0615
.00%
$00.
00%
7,39
371
.00%
3,02
029
.00%
0$3
,816
,000
53.0
0%$3
,384
,000
47.0
0%$0
0.00
%
12.8
7883
.10%
2,61
916
.90%
00.
00%
$14,
176,
510
77.6
0%$4
,092
,188
22.4
0%$0
0.00
%0
0.00
%93
0 10
0.03
%0
0.00
%$0
0.00
%$1
98,2
0010
0.00
%$0
0.00
%6,
878
88.8
0%75
89.
80%
106
1.40
%$5
,267
,453
85.5
0%$8
00,9
0013
.00%
$92,
411
1.50
%29
195
.10%
15. 4
.90%
00.
00%
$142
,113
94.9
0%$7
,637
5.10
%$0
0.00
%34
61.9
0%21
38.1
0%0
0.00
%'
$21,
634
38.7
0%$3
4,26
761
.30%
$00.
00%
17,8
2354
.00%
11,8
8236
.03%
990
3.00
%$1
2.37
3,43
636
.00%
$20,
622,
393
60.0
0%$1
,374
,826
4.00
%0
0.00
%4,
100
100.
00%
o0.
00%
$00.
00%
$7,0
00,0
0010
0.00
%$0
0.00
%N
/AN
/AN
/A$1
9,87
6,18
610
0.00
%S
O0.
00%
$00.
00%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20,8
[178
.40%
5,73
721
60%
o0.
00%
$21,
940,
530
67.9
0%$1
0,37
2,47
532
.10%
$00.
00%
00.
00%
31,8
37 1
00.0
0%0
0.00
%$0
0.00
%$4
5,42
0,49
110
0.00
%$0
0.00
%4,
698
78.0
0%1,
325
22.0
0%0
0.00
%$1
,593
,720
76.0
0%$5
03,2
8024
.00%
$00.
00%
5,05
710
0.00
%0
0.00
%0
0.00
%$1
,730
,280
100.
00%
$00.
00%
$00.
00%
50.6
2172
50%
19,2
0127
50%
o0.
00%
$41,
705,
000
47.5
0%$4
6,09
5,00
052
.50%
$00.
00%
1,35
993
70%
916.
30%
00.
00%
$2,7
28,3
1493
.00%
$205
.357
7.00
%$0
0.00
%17
41.5
0%25
58.5
0%0
0.00
%$4
9,57
942
.00%
$68,
466
58.0
0%$0
0.00
%
1,50
8/5
.00%
503
25.0
0%0
0.00
%$8
98,5
6772
.00%
$349
,451
28.0
0%$0
0.00
%
1,92
921
.00%
7,25
679
.00%
00.
00%
$1,8
90,1
4816
.00%
$9,9
23,2
7884
.00%
$o0.
00%
5362
.00%
3338
.00%
00.
00%
$55,
497
58.0
0%$4
3,60
544
.00%
$00.
00%
38
MO
NT
AN
A
Nut
nber
of
Aw
ards
AI
In-S
tate
Publ
icin
stitu
tions
Perc
ent
At i
n-St
ate
Publ
icIn
stitu
tions
Perc
ent
At I
n-St
ate
At
Priv
ate
Out
-of-
Stat
eIn
stitu
tions
Perc
ent
Inst
itutio
nsPe
rcen
tPe
rcen
t
liais
e of
Aw
ards
At I
n-St
ate
[titi
vate
Inst
itutio
nsPe
rcen
tA
t Out
-of-
Stat
eIn
stitu
tions
SS
IG91
393
.07%
686.
93%
00.
00%
$402
,204
95.9
5%$1
6,97
74.
05%
SO
0.00
%
NE
BR
AS
KA
Sch
olar
ship
Ass
ista
nce
1,89
872
.00%
738
28.0
0%0
0.00
%$6
36,8
4673
.00%
$235
,546
27.0
0%$0
0.00
%
Sta
te S
chol
arsh
ip A
war
d2.
976
80.0
0%74
420
.00%
00.
00%
$989
,328
71.0
0%$4
04,0
9129
.00%
$00.
00%
Pos
tsec
onda
ry E
duca
tion
Aw
ard
00.
00%
689
100.
00%
00.
00%
$00.
00%
$460
,125
100.
00%
$00.
00%
NE
W H
AM
PS
H.R
EIn
cent
ive
Pro
gram
876
57.0
0%24
516
.430
%41
527
.00%
$404
,533
50.0
0%$2
02,2
6725
.00%
$202
,267
25.0
0%
Leve
rage
d In
cent
ive
Pro
gram
N/A
N/A
N/A
$412
,720
67.0
0%$2
03,2
8033
.00%
$00.
00%
NE
W J
ER
SE
YT
uitio
n A
id G
rant
39,9
2980
.00%
9.98
220
.00%
00.
00%
$76,
933,
606
65.0
0%$4
1,42
5,78
835
.00%
$00.
00%
Par
t-T
ime
TA
G/E
OF
270
84.0
0%52
16.0
0%0
0.00
%$2
33,1
3962
.00%
$142
,891
38.0
0%$0
0.00
%
Edu
catio
nal O
ppor
tuni
ty F
und
10,1
4685
.00%
1.79
015
.00%
00.
00%
$8,0
63,3
1769
.03%
$3,6
22,6
5031
.00%
$00.
00%
NE
W Y
OR
KT
uitio
n A
ssis
tanc
e P
rogr
amA
id fo
r P
art-
Tim
e S
tudy
176,
245
21,1
2959
.60%
87.0
0%11
9,46
840
.40%
3,15
713
.00%
0 00.
00%
0.00
%$3
23,5
99,0
95$1
0,55
9,20
051
.90%
80.0
0%$2
99,9
05,9
05$2
,639
,800
48.1
0%20
.00%
$0 500.
00%
0.00
%
NO
RT
H D
AK
OT
AS
tate
Stu
dent
Ince
ntw
e3,
003
84.0
0%57
216
.00%
00.
00%
$1,6
77,0
2084
.00%
$319
,432
16.0
0%$0
0.00
%
OH
IOIn
stru
ctio
nal G
rant
68.8
5378
.00%
19,4
2022
.00%
00.
00%
$46,
915,
170
58.0
0%$3
3,97
3,05
342
.00%
$00.
00%
OK
LAH
OM
A1.
0 0O
klah
oma
Tui
tion
Aid
Gra
nt P
rogr
amW
illia
m P
. Will
is S
chol
arsh
ip17
,696 26
92.8
5%10
0.00
%1.
363
7.15
%0
0.00
%0 0
0.00
%0.
00%
$13,
704,
176
$40,
065
91.8
4%10
0.00
%$1
,217
,618 $0
8.16
%0.
00%
$0 500.
00%
0.00
%
OR
EG
ON
Nee
d G
rant
12,8
6589
.00%
1,59
011
.00%
00.
00%
$9,7
70A
6871
.00%
$3,9
90,7
5429
.00%
$00.
00%
PE
NN
SY
LVA
NIA
Sta
te G
rant
Pro
gram
PO
W1M
IA D
epen
dent
s G
rant
73.7
130
51.2
4%0.
00%
60.0
7541
.76%
110
0.00
%10
,070
07.
00%
0.00
%$1
01,1
45,1
01 $046
.68%
0.00
%$1
10,9
38,9
28$1
,200
51.2
0%10
0.00
%$4
,593
,565 $0
2.12
%0.
00%
RH
OD
E IS
LAN
DS
chol
arsh
ip &
Gra
nt P
rogr
am7,
213
59.0
0%1,
712
14.0
0%3,
301
27.0
0%$3
,293
,745
52.0
0%$1
,266
,825
20.0
0%$1
,773
,555
28.0
0%
SO
UT
H C
AR
OLI
NA
Tui
tion
Gra
nts
00.
00%
8,43
0 10
0.00
%0
0.00
%$0
0.00
%$1
6,71
1,90
410
0.00
%$0
0.00
%
TE
NN
ES
SE
ES
tude
nt A
ssis
tanc
e A
war
dS
tude
nt A
ssis
tanc
e A
war
d -
17.4
4480
.50%
4,22
519
.50%
00.
00%
$10,
538,
892
57.7
3%57
,716
,594
42.2
7%50
0.00
%
Res
tort
ion
Act
00
CO
%3,
544
100.
00%
00.
00%
$00.
00%
$2,1
00,0
0010
0.00
%$0
0.00
%
UT
AH
SS
IG2,
368
98.4
2%38
1.58
%0
0.00
%$1
,101
,399
97.5
6%$2
7,54
62.
44%
$00.
00%
VE
RM
ON
TIn
cent
ive
Gra
nt P
rogr
amP
art-
Tim
e G
rant
Pro
gram
Non
-Deg
ree
Gra
nt
3,27
81,
799
458
37 1
0%69
.00%
44.1
0%
2.03
323
.00%
657
25.2
0%55
853
.70%
3,52
515
1 23
39.9
0%5.
80%
2.20
%
$3,3
01,4
76$4
50,4
83$1
82,7
25
31.6
0%45
.30%
52.9
0%
$3,6
14,9
06$4
92.2
50$1
55,0
92
34.6
0%49
.50%
44.9
0%
$3,5
31,3
25$5
1,71
1$7
,599
33.8
0%5.
20%
2.20
%
3940
VIR
GIN
IAC
olle
ge S
chol
arsh
ip A
ssis
tanc
eP
rogr
am (
k's
are
estim
ates
)La
st D
olla
r P
rogr
am (
Ws
are
estim
ates
)D
iscr
etio
nary
Aid
Virg
inia
Tra
nsfe
r G
rant
Virg
inia
Gua
rant
eed
WA
SH
ING
TO
NS
late
Nee
d G
rant
(W
s ar
e es
timat
es)
Edu
catio
n O
ppor
tuni
tyA
mer
ican
Indi
an E
ndow
ed
WE
ST
VIR
GIN
IAH
ighe
r E
duca
tion
Gra
nt P
rogr
am
WIS
CO
NS
INW
isco
nsin
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n G
rant
Wis
cons
in T
uitio
n G
rant
Tal
ent I
ncen
tive
Gra
ntIn
dian
Stu
dent
Gra
ntM
inor
ity R
eten
tion
Gra
nt
WY
OM
ING
SS
IG
PU
ER
TO
RIC
OS
SIG
Edu
catio
nal F
unds
Legi
slat
ive
Gra
nts
Sup
plem
enta
ry A
id P
rogr
am
ALL
ST
AT
ES
At I
n-St
ate
Publ
icIn
atlin
tlonv
Perc
ent
6,11
175
.00%
585
75.0
0%25
,500
75.0
0%47
175
.00%
875
.00%
41,4
4092
.50%
5332
.00%
475
.00%
4,28
981
.31%
42,1
5599
.97%
00.
00%
4,02
676
.90%
658
74.9
0%28
537
.50%
N/A
766 0
8.11
58,
399
26.0
0%0.
00%
52.0
0%10
0.00
%
1,03
8,28
266
.92%
Num
ber
of A
war
ds
Min
-Sta
tePr
ivat
eIn
atIt
utlo
nsPe
rcen
t
1,99
724
.50%
191
24.5
0%8,
330
24.5
0%15
424
.50%
225
.00%
3,36
07.
50%
114
68.0
0%1
25.0
0%
939
17.8
1%
00.
00%
8,88
910
0.00
%1,
209
23.1
0%22
125
.10%
475
62.5
0%
N/A
2,17
928
,347
7,49
0 0
74.0
0%10
0.00
%48
.00%
0.00
%
494,
410
31.8
7%
At
ant-
stst
ate
Inst
itutio
nsPe
rcen
t
410.
50%
40.
50%
170
0.50
%3
0.50
%0.
00%
0.00
%O
0.00
%O
0.00
%
460.
88%
130.
03%
O0.
00%
O0.
00%
O0.
00%
00.
00%
N/A
Alli
kSta
tePu
blic
Inat
lintia
naPe
rcen
t
Val
ue o
f A
war
ds
AtI
nTSt
ate
Priv
ate
inst
itutio
nsPe
rcen
t
$4,4
71,8
7675
.00%
$1,4
60,8
1324
.54.
:*4
$499
,313
75.0
0%$1
63,1
0924
.50%
$42,
527,
378
75.0
0%$1
3,89
2,27
724
.50%
$615
.300
75.0
0%$2
00,9
9824
.50%
$15,
772
75.0
0%$5
,152
25.0
0%
$47,
119,
715
89.0
0%$5
,823
,786
11.0
0%$1
26,6
0030
.00%
$295
,400
70.0
0%$6
,000
75.0
0%$2
,000
25.0
0%
$4,9
37,9
5274
.98%
$1,6
42,6
9124
.67%
$25,
356,
240
99.9
0%0
0.00
%$0
0.00
%$1
6,15
6,83
5 10
0.00
%$4
,134
,804
73.8
5%$1
,464
,117
26.1
5%$1
,172
,888
74.9
0%$3
93,0
5125
.10%
$279
,688
33.7
0%$5
50,2
4766
.30%
N/A
N/A
00.
00%
$231
,709
36.0
0%$4
11,9
2764
.00%
00.
00%
$00.
00%
$9,9
62,4
8310
0.00
%0
0.00
%$5
,695
,666
79.0
0%$1
,514
,037
21.0
0%0
0.00
%$4
,258
,486
100.
00%
$00.
00%
18,8
791.
22%
$1,2
88,4
04,2
5655
.35%
$1,0
27,1
4- ,.
.44
.13%
Not
e: T
able
exc
lude
s D
istr
ict o
f Col
umbi
a. N
evad
a, N
ew M
exic
o, N
orth
Car
olin
a, S
outh
Dak
ota
and
Tex
as a
s da
ta is
not a
vaila
ble.
At O
ut-o
f St
ate
Inst
itutio
nsPe
rcen
t
$29,
813
$3,3
29$2
83,5
16$4
,102 $0 $0 $0 $0
$23,
050
$25,
382 $0 $0 $0 $0 N
/A $0 $0 $0 $0
$12,
025,
073
0.50
%0.
50%
0.50
%0.
50%
0.00
%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.35
%
0.10
%0.
00%
0.00
%0.
00%
0.00
%
0.00
%0.
00%
L' 0
.00%
0.00
%
0.52
%
Table Seven
Comments to Better Understand Agency Positions
California
State grant increases have been tied largely to public institution student fee increases but themaximum award for private institutions and the number of authorized awards has not increasedsince 1989.
Colorado
Up to 30% of Work-Study allocation may be spent without regard to need.
Connecticut
The Scholastic Achievement Grant Program is the only centrally administered Program. TheCICS and CAPS Programs allocated funds to Connecticut colleges and Connecticut studentsapply to these funds through the college financial aid office.
Florida
State Tuition Voucher was renamed Florida Resident Access Grant.
A new minority program was funded, Rosewood Family Scholarship.
Some funding was provided for the Occupational Therapy/Physical Therapy Programs, which aredesigned to attract these professionals to seek employment in the public school system.
Florida's four historically black colleges, which participate in the Mary McLeod BethuneScholarship, are now playing a larger role in administering the program.
With the funding of additional minority law school scholarships, administration of the VirgilHawkins Fellowship has been transferred entirely to the Florida Education Fund, a state-creatednonprofit entity which administers a variety of minority programs.
Georgia
Iowa
The 1994-95 year was the second year of the HOPE Scholarship Program, which is funded bythe Georgia Lottery for Education. There are four components, one for public college students,one for private college students, one for public technical schools, and one for GED recipients.
Fiscal year 1995 appropriations for need-based state student aid programs increased by$937,000, a 2.85 percent increase over FY'94 funding.
- 22 - 43
Massachusetts
Goal of programs are to promote access and choice. Funds are awarded to neediest studentsbased on an indexing system. Award levels reflect student cost of attendance at institution type(public vs. private).
Michigan
Appropriations and expenditures in the Competitive Scholarship Program (CSP) and the TuitionGrant Program (TGP) pose problems for statistical reports. Part I, Page 1, identifiesappropriations and Part IV identifies actual expenditures. Our TGP appropriation supplementsawards in the CSP, so dollars paid out in CSP are higher than appropriation. The TGP dollarspaid out are less than appropriation as the difference is paid to CSP recipients. When identifyingincreases or decreases in funding levels for states, Part I should be used.
Minnesota
Decreased volume in SELF loans 'attributed to common application form for Stafford Un-Sub loan.
Mississippi
Effective July 1, 1991 the Mississippi Legislature passed new legislation regarding state studentfinancial aid policies entitled the Omnibus Loan or Scholarship Act of 1991 ("Omnibus").
The Legislature found that as a result of restrictive and punitive provisions contained in the loanor scholarship programs in existence prior to passage of Omnibus, there were low levels ofutilization of programs by the eligible student population. The Legislature also found thatprograms being enacted at various times and for various specialized purposes hadinconsistencies in the provisions for their administration. Monies dedicated for use in studentloans or scholarships needed improved methods of utilization. Older existing revolving fundsneeded to be collapsed and consolidated into a single revolving fund.
Omnibus allowed for consistent, uniform, and regular student financial aid programs. The Lawcollapsed and consolidated program funds into a single revolving fund. The Law allowed for thecreation of additional scholarship programs for the purpose of encouraging eligible Mississippiresidents to enter into professional schools and encouraged the participation of minorities ingraduate, professional programs in the institutions of Mississippi. The Board of Trustees of StateInstitutions of Higher Learning (the "Board") was granted the power and authority to create andimplement new loan or scholarship programs as they may be needed. The Law created an abilitywithin the Board to fashion new and innovative systems for the financing of loan or scholarshipprograms by continuing the use of private sector loans for education and federal guaranteedstudent loans with scholarship repayment provisions promulgated by the Board. The Board was
44- 23 -
granted authority to devise and develop innovative systems to obtain the most efficient use ofstate funds to encourage entry and service in certain professional fields.
In the years since the Omnibus enactment, continuing programs have expanded, additionalprograms have been created, and expenditure of funds has been increased.
Montana
Programs are decentralized, central office distributes funds (Federal and/or State) to eligibleinstitutions who award aid to eligible students.
New York
Ohio
No major increases or decreases were enacted for the-1994-95 year.
Adoption of the Federal definition of an independent student has resulted in a significant shift instate grant benefits to these students. This may become a policy issue in the next biennialbudget session.
Oregon
Due to statewide reductions in funds, several of our core grant programs have been eliminated.Their loss resulted in fierce competition among educational segments for the remaining dollars.
Pennsylvania
For the first time, students enrolled on a part-time basis became eligible for the State GrantProgram, with the passage of authorizing legislation in October 1994. The program wasimmediately implemented, and targeted the lowest income students enrolled on a less than full-time but at least half-time basis.
Puerto Rico
Legislative Grant is the matching State source for SSIG. Funds are matched $1 per $1. TheSupplmentary Aid Program is administered by the State University (University of Puerto Rico) andis therefore available only for UPR students.
South Carolina
Available funds in 1994-95 were used to award all eligible applicants through June 30 of the year.Percentage of tuition being covered by the grant continues to decrease as funding of programdoes not keep pace with tuition increases at the colleges. Average of 24.7% of tuition wascovered by the grant in 1994-95, compared to 80% in initial year of the program (1970).
- 24 - 45
Utah
Utah has an extensive tuition waiver program in its nine public colleges and universities, notincluded in this survey because it is administered by the institutions. Up to 10 percent ofassessable resident tuition may be waived for "meritorious" or "impecunious" students. Majorityof use is based on merit, but many recipients also qualify for need-based aid.
Vermont
VSAC is a comprehensive agency that provides career counseling and financial aid informationto middle schools, high school, and adult students. VSAC provides grant programs for studentsenrolled in full-time, part-time, and non-degree courses and programs. VSAC also serves as aguarantor for Vermont's students and institutions, and provides loan capital through its EducationLoan Finance Program.
Washington
Total state effort includes aid dollars derived from tuition and fees at the public colleges, which,by definition, are not administered by this agency and therefore are not included in this survey.The total of public college student financial aid, administered by the colleges in 1994-95, wasapproximately $17 million. This is in addition to about $65 million in grant and work programsappropriated to this agency for statewide programs.
West Virginia
The '94-95 school term was the second year of a five-year funding improvement plan for theProgram. Although the recommended annual increase was set at 1.5 million, the level has notbeen reached during the initial two years. The Program was level funded during '93-94, but wasincreased by $750,000 in '94-95. Major policy change occurred in the selection process.Established common pool for ranking purposes, thereby eliminatirig the preferential treatmentpreviously granted to prior recipients.
Wisconsin
The Nursing Student Stipend Loan, a loan forgiveness program, is being phased-out.
4 6
- 25 -
Table Eight
Aggregate Dollars of Awards for Undergraduate Need-Based Grant Programs,By State, Grouped By Award Dollar Volumes, 1989-90 to i 994-95
(S amounts in millions)
Eive-ItearPercent
1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 Change
CALIFORNIA 8153.045 $161.642 $172.852 $149.238 $207.969 $232.067 51.6%
ILLINOIS 171.361 183.508 184.753 202.424 214.809 244.352 42.6%
NEW JERSEY 84.347 87.054 100.220 111.002 135.251 159.683 89.3%
NEW YORK 382.655 428.358 504.195 595.345 618.849 636.704 66.4%
PENNSYLVANIA 132.344 142.389 158.092 171.839 188.751 218.604 65.2%
SUBTOTAL 923.752 $1,002.951 $1,120.112 81,229.848 81,365.629 $1,491.409 61.5%PCT. CHANGE 12.2% 8.6% 11.7% 9.8% 11.0% 9.2%
CONNECTICUT $19.915 $20.580 $20.595 $20.805 820.641 $20.690 3.9%
FLORIDA 20.134 24.729 29.279 26.170 31.277 36.824 82.9%
INDIANA 41.874 46.756 (50.441) 55.814 (55.814) 67.742 61.8%
IOWA 32.467 35.586 34.654 34.082 34.718 35.642 9.8%
KENTUCKY 12.605 19.866 16.996 20.459 20.619 25.517 102.4%
MARYLAND 14.800 15.607 16.253 19.418 23.713 24.571 66.0%
MASSACHUSETTS 50.844 46.000 23.690 45.841 45.059 61.850 21.6%
MICHIGAN 70.721 68.918 78.116 79.086 79.735 81.340 15.0%
MINNESOTA 58.136 74.656 81.322 84.684 102.920 97.920 68.4%
OHIO 53.848 54.600 57.275 62.300 77.940 91.225 69.4%
PUERTO RICO (16.812) (16.812) 16.488 (20.117) (20.117) 22.074 31.3%
TEXAS 24.784 24.135 27.385 28.218 29.102 29.102 ' 22.4%
VIRGINIA 7.966 7.351 4.892 6.395 6.408 53.885 576.4%
WASHINGTON 13.925 21.095 23.527 23.399 46.617 53.369 283.3%
WISCONSIN 38.072 42.365 42.324 42.755 46.592 49.511 30.0%
SUBTOTAL 6460.091 6502.244 8506.749 8549.426 8621.155 $751.262 63.3%PCT. CHANGE -1.1% 9.2% 0.9% 8.4% 13.1% 20.9%
COLORADO 810.349 811.276 $12.380 $13.660 816.480 818.252 76.4%
MISSOURI 10.796 11.078 10.142 10.883 11.124 11.913 10.3%
NEW MEXICO 5.601 6.479 (7.293) 8.295 9.266 13.886 147.9%
NORTH CAROLINA 3.046 2.519 2.908 13.846 14.436 13.774 352.2%
OKLAHOMA 11.591 11.871 12.612 13.317 13.405 13.325 15.0%
OREGON 10.092 11.809 12.023 11.943 12.903 13.761 36.4%
SOUTH CAROLINA 18.150 17.901 16.800 16.708 16.795 17.297 -4.7%
TENNESSEE 12.977 13.487 12.793 14.270 16.755 18.313 41.1%
VERMONT 11.137 10.184 11.019 11.073 11.167 11.788 6.1%
SUBTOTAL 893.739 896.604 897.970 $113.995 8122.331 6132.308 41.1%PCT. CHANGE 6.3% 3.1% 1.41% 16.4% 7.3% 8.2%
- 26 -
Flve-YearPercent
1969-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 Change
ARKANSAS $3.946 $3.885 $4.742 $6.434 $7.701 $8.907 125.7%
GEORGIA 4.607 5.070 5.084 5.157 26.853 5.147 11.7%
KANSAS 6.478 6.462 6.587 6.810 9.060 9.802 51.3%
LOUISIANA 2.786 3.827 4.446 5.521 6.374 6.429 130.8%
MAINE 1.877 4.802 5.002 4.970 5.170 5.787 208.3%
RHODE ISLAND 9.917 9.522 9.141 8.263 6.500 6.340 -36.1%
WEST VIRGINIA 5.217 5.559 5.781 5.805 5.802 6.761 29.6%
SUBTOTAL $34.828 $39.127 $40.783 $42.960 667.460 $49.172 41.2%
PCT. CHANGE 8.3% 12.3% 4.2% 5.3% 57.0% -27.1%
ALABAMA $2984 $2.878 $2.183 $2.211 $2.283 $2.281 -23.6%
ARIZONA 3.420 3.318 2.278 3.450 3.476 3.482 1.8%
DELAWARE 0.956 1.066 U.906 1.021 1.270 1.033 8.1%
DIST OF COLUMBIA 1.069 0.947 0.978 1.026 1.022 1.022 -4.4%
MISSISSIPPI 1.243 1.136 1.131 1.244 1.255 1.248 0.4%
NEBRASKA 1.276 2.192 2.370 2.610 2.686 2.726 113.6%
NEW HAMPSHIRE 0.918 0.770 0.825 0.810 0.840 1.425 55.2%
NORTH DAKOTA 1.242 1.177 1.475 2.018 2.036 1.996 60.7%
UTAH 1.091 1.001 1.034 1.120 1.132 1.129 3.5%
SUBTOTAL 614.199 $14.485 $13.180 $15.510 $16.000 $16.343 15.1%
PCT. CHANGE 10.5% 2.0% -9.0% 17.7% 3.2% 2.1%
ALASKA $0.228 $0.464 $0.475 $0484 $0.454 $0444 94.9%
HAWAII 0.726 0.612 0.632 (0.724) 0.748 0.732 0.8%.
IDAHO 0.346 0.350 0.483 0.631 0.634 0.779 125.3%
MONTANA 0.415 0.383 0.414 0.431 0.401 0.419 1.0%
NEVADA 0.352 0.321 0.326 0.342 0.342 0.342 -2.8%
SOUTH DAKOTA 0.504 0.468 0.480 0.587 0.589 0.589 16.9%
WYOMING (0.241) (0.212) 0.216 0.225 0.250 0.225 -6.6%
SUBTOTAL $2.897 $2.846 $3.014 $3.317 $3.416 $3.531 21.9%PCT. CHANGE 8.5% -1.8% 5.9% 10.1% 3.0% 3.4%
GRAND TOTAL $1,529.506 61,658.257 61 ,781.808 61 ,955.056 62,195.991 52,444.025 59.8%PCT CHANGE 7.4% 8.4% 7.5% 9.7% 12.3% 11.3%
Data are from 1993-94 Annual Survey ReportNote: Numbers in parentheses are estimates from preceding year's responses.
48- 27 -
Table Nine
Estimated Grant Dollars Per Resident Population,1994-95, By State
Need-BasedAid to
State Undergraduates State All Grant Aid StateTotal 1993Population
1. NEW YORK $35.02 1. NEW YORK $36.12 NATION 257,886,0002. MINNESOTA 21.68 2. ILLINOIS 23.11 1. CALIFORNIA 31,211,0003. ILLINOIS 20.89 3. MINNESOTA 21.69 2. NEW YORK 18,179,0004. VERMONT 20.46 4. NEW JERSEY 21.55 3. TEXAS 18,031,0005. NEW JERSEY 20.27 5. VERMONT 21.26 4. FLORIDA 13,679,000
6. PENNSYLVANIA 18.14 6. PENNSYLVANIA 18.19 5. PENNSYLVANIA 12,048,0007. IOWA 12.67 7. GEORGIA 17.08 6. ILLINOIS 11,697,0008. INDIANA 11.86 8. NORTH CAROLINA 13.51 7. OHIO 11,091,0009. MASSACHUSETTS 10.29 9. IOWA 12.86 8. MICHIGAN 9,478,000
10. WASHINGTON 10.16 10. VIRGINIA 12.81 9. NEW JERSEY 7,879,000
11. WISCONSIN 9.83 11. CALIFORNIA 12.67 10. NORTH CAROLINA 6,945,000NATION 9.48 NATION 12.22 11. GEORGIA 6,917,000
12. NEW MEXICO 8.59 12. WISCONSIN 12.07 12. VIRGINIA 6,491,00013. MICHIGAN 8.58 13. INDIANA 11.93 13. MASSACHUSETTS 6,012,00014. VIRGINIA 8.30 14. OHIO 11.23 14. INDIANA 5,713,000
15. OHIO 8.23 15. UTAH 11.09 15. WASHINGTON 5,255,00016. CALIFORNIA 7.44 16. WASHINGTON 10.32 16. MISSOURI 5,234,00017. KENTUCKY 6.73 17. MASSACHUSETTS 10.30 17. TENNESSEE 5,099,00018. RHODE ISLAND 6.34 18. WEST VIRGINIA 10.18 18. WISCONSIN 5,038,00019. CONNECTICUT 6.31 19. COLORADO 9.26 19. MARYLAND 4,965,000
20. COLORADO 5.12 20. NEW MEXICO 9.17 20. MINNESOTA 4,517,00021. MARYLAND 4.95 21. MICHIGAN 9.03 21. LOUISIANA 4,295,00022. SOUTH CAROLINA 4.75 22. FLORIDA 7.27 22. ALABAMA 4,187,00023. MAINE 4.67 23. KENTUCKY 6.73 23. ARIZONA 3,936,00024. OREGON 4.54 24. NORTH DAKOTA 6.58 24. KENTUCKY 3,789,000
25. OKLAHOMA 4.12 25. MARYLAND 6.47 25. SOUTH CAROLINA 3,643,00026. KANSAS 3.87 26. SOUTH CAROLINA 6.41 26. COLORADO 3,566,00027. WEST VIRGINIA 3.71 27. CONNECTICUT 6.38 27. CONNECTICUT 3,277,00028. ARKANSAS 3.67 28. RHODE ISLAND 6.34 28. OKLAHOMA 3,231,00029. TENNESSEE 3.59 29. MAINE 5.72 29. OREGON 3,032,000
30. NORTH DAKOTA 3.14 30. OKLAHOMA 5.63 30. IOWA 2,814,00031. FLORIDA 2.69 31. KANSAS 4.96 31. MISSISSIPPI 2,643,00032. MISSOURI 2.28 32. OREGON 4.54 32. KANSAS 2,531,00033. NORTH CAROLINA 1.98 33. MISSOURI 4.48 33. ARKANSAS 2,424,00034. DIST OF COLUMBIA* 1.77 34. TEXAS' 4.09 34. UTAH 1,860,000
35. NEBRASKA 1.70 35. ARKANSAS 4.04 35. WEST VIRGINIA 1,820,00036. TEXAS* 1.61 36. TENNESSEE 3.75 36. NEW MEXICO 1,616,00037. LOUISIANA 1.50 37. ALASKA 3.69 37. NEBRASKA 1,607,00038. DELAWARE 1.48 38. DIST OF COLUMBIA' 3.55 38. NEVADA 1,389,00039. NEW HAMPSHIRE 1.27 39. LOUISIANA 3.05 39. MAINE 1,239,000
40. ARIZONA 0.88 40. ALABAMA 2.89 40. HAWAII 1,172,00041. SOUTH DAKOTA* 0.82 41. DELAWARE 2.62 41. NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,125,00042. GEORGIA 0.74 42. NEBRASKA 1.70 42. IDAHO 1,099,00043. ALASKA 0.74 43. NEW HAMPSHIRE 1.37 43. RHODE ISLAND 1,000,00044. IDAHO 0.71 44. SOUTH DAKOTA' 1.01 44. MONTANA 839,000
45. HAWAII 0.62 45. IDAHO 0.97 45. SOUTH DAKOTA 715,00046. UTAH 0.61 46. MISSISSIPPI 0.97 46. DELAWARE 700,00047. ALABAMA 0.54 47. ARIZONA 0.89 47. NORTH DAKOTA 635,00048. MONTANA 0.50 48. HAWAII 0.62 48. ALASKA 599,00049. WYOMING 0.48 49. MONTANA 0.50 49. DIST OF COLUMBIA 578,00050. MISSISSIPPI 0.47 50. WYOMING 0.48 50. VERMONT 576,00051. NEVADA* 0.25 51. NEVADA' 0.29 51. WYOMING 470,000
Sources of Data: Grant Aid Dollars are calculated from Column One and Column Six in Table 1 of this Report. Resident population Statisticsare from U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1994 Statistical Abstract of the United States, Table 26, Page 27.
Figures for these States are from 1993-94 Annual Survey Report.
- 28 - 4 9
Table Ten
Estimated Grant Dollars Per Resident College-AgePopulation, 1994-95, By State
Need-Based Aidto All Grant
EstimatedPopulationAge 18-24 in
State Undergraduates State Aid State 1993
1. NEW YORK $362 1. NEW YORK $373 NATION 25,661,0002. MINNESOTA 233 2. NEW JERSEY 243 1. CALIFORNIA 3,102,0003. NEW JERSEY 228 3. ILLINOIS 236 2. TEXAS 1,903,0004. ILLINOIS 213 4. MINNESOTA 233 3. NEW YORK 1,759,0005. VERMONT 190 5. VERMONT 197 4. FLORIDA 1,160,000
5. PENNSYLVANIA 1,158,0006. PENNSYLVANIA 189 6. PENNSYLVANIA 1897. IOWA 128 7. GEORGIA 160 6. ILLINOIS 1,147,0008. INDIANA 111 8. IOWA 130 7. OHIO 1,108,0009. WASHINGTON 108 9. CALIFORNIA 127 8. MICHIGAN 967,000
10. MASSACHUSETTS 103 10. WISCONSIN 124 9. NORTH CAROLINA 755,00010. GEORGIA 738,000
11. WISCONSIN 101 11. NORTH CAROLINA 124NATION 95 12. VIRGINIA 122 11. NEW JERSEY 699,000
12. NEW MEXICO 87 NATION 123 12. VIRGINIA 682,00013. MICHIGAN 84 13. INDIANA 112 13. INDIANA 610,00014. OHIO 82 14. OHIO 112 14. MASSACHUSETTS 602,00015. VIRGINIA 79 15. TENNESSEE 530,000
15. WASHINGTON 11016. CALIFORNIA 75 16. MASSACHUSETTS 103 16. MISSOURI 505,00017. CONNECTICUT 71 17. WEST VIRGINIA 95 17. WASHINGTON 492,00018. KENTUCKY 63 18. COLORADO 95 18. WISCONSIN 491,00019. RHODE ISLAND 60 19. NEW MEXICO 93 19. LOUISIANA 457,00020. MARYLAND 54 20. ALABAMA 454,000
20. UTAH 91
21. COLORADO 53 21. MICHIGAN 89 21. MARYLAND 453,00022. OREGON 49 22. FLORIDA 86 22. MINNESOTA 420,00023. MAINE 48 23. CONNECTICUT 72 23. SOUTH CAROLINA 406,00024. SOUTH CAROLINA 43 24. MARYLAND 71 24. KENTUCKY 404,00025. OKLAHOMA 40 25. ARIZONA 389,000
25. NORTH DAKOTA 6326. KANSAS 39 26. KENTUCKY 63 26. COLORADO 346,00027. ARKANSAS 36 27. RHODE ISLAND 60 27. OKLAHOMA 332,00028. WEST VIRGINIA 35 28. MAINE 59 28. MISSISSIPPI 305,00029. TENNESSEE 35 29. SOUTH CAROLINA 57 29. CONNECTICUT 292,00030. FLORIDA 32 30. OREGON 279,000
30. OKLAHOMA 5531. NORTH DAKOTA 30 31. KANSAS 50 31. IOWA 279,00032. MISSOURI 24 32. OREGON 49 32. KANSAS 250,00033. NORTH CAROLINA 18 33. MISSOURI 46 33. ARKANSAS 247,00034. NEBRASKA 17 34. ARKANSAS 40 34. UTAH 226,00035. DIST OF COLUMBIA' 16 35. WEST VIRGINIA 195,000
35. TEXAS' 3936. TEXAS' 15 36. ALASKA 38 36. NEW MEXICO 159,00037. DELAWARE 15 37. TENNESSEE 36 37. NEBRASKA 157,00038. LOUISIANA 14 38. DIST OF COLUMBIA' 32 38. MAINE 121,00039. NEW HAMPSHIRE 13 39. LOUISIANA 29 39. NEVADA' 120,00040. ARIZONA 9 40. HAWAII 118,000
40. ALABAMA 2741. SOUTH DAKOTA' 9 41. DELAWARE 26 41. IDAHO 115,00042. ALASKA 8 42. NEBRASKA 17 42. NEW HAMPSHIRE 108,00043. GEORGIA 7 43. NEW HAMPSHIRE 14 43. RHODE ISLAND 105,00044. IDAHO 7 44. SOUTH DAKOTA' 11 44. MONTANA 78,00045. HAWAII 6 45. IDAHO 9 45. DELAWARE 71,000
46. ALABAMA 5 46. ARIZONA 9 46. SOUTH DAKOTA' 69,00047. MONTANA 5 47. MISSISSIPPI 8 47. NORTH DAKOTA 66,00048. UTAH 5 48. HAWAII 6 48. DIST OF COLUMBIA 64,00049. WYOMING 5 49. MONTANA 5 49. VERMONT 62,00050. MISSISSIPPI 4 50. WYOMING 5 50. ALASKA 58,00051. NEVADA' 3 51. NEVADA' 3 51. WYOMING 48,000
So-urces of Data: Grani-Aid Dollars are calculated from Column One and Column Six in Table 1 ofstatistics are from U.S. Department of the Census, 1994 Statistical Abstract of the United States, T
Figures for these States are from 1993-94 Annual Survey Report.
- 2950
this Report. Resident Populationable 33, page 32.
Table Eleven
Estimated Grant Dollars to Undergraduates in 1994-95Per Full-Time Undergraduate Enrollment, By State
Need-BasedAid to Undergraduate
EstimatedFall 1992
State Undergraduates State Grant Aid State Undergraduates
1. NEW YORK $1,161 1. NEW YORK $1,174 NATION 7,037,9272. NEW JERSEY 1,084 2. NEW JERSEY 1,152 1. CALIFORNIA 789,7913. ILLINOIS 765 3. ILLINOIS 846 2. NEW YORK 548,3144. MINNESOTA 705 4. MINNESOTA 705 3. TEXAS 447,0565. PENNSYLVANIA 653 5. GEORGIA 701 4. PENNSYLVANIA 334,805
5. ILLINOIS 319,4306. VERMONT 547 6. PENNSYLVANIA 6537. INDIANA 401 7. VERMONT 549 6. OHIO 305,7538. WASHINGTON 370 8. VIRGINIA 418 7. FLORIDA 266,861
NATION 347 9. I NDIANA 403 8. MICHIGAN 251,6239. IOWA 328 10. OHIO 406 9. NORTH.CAROLINA 213,075
10. MASSACHUSETTS 210,87710. NEW MEXICO 326 NATION 39911. MICHIGAN 323 11. WASHINGTON 376 11. VIRGINIA 170,41912. VIRGINIA 316 12. FLORIDA 370 12. INDIANA 169,05713. CONNECTICUT 314 13. IOWA 332 13. GEORGIA 166,37014. CALIFORNIA 301 14. NEW MEXICO 329 14. WISCONSIN 164,746
15. NEW JERSEY 147,37515. WISCONSIN 301 15. MICHIGAN 32316. OHIO 298 16. WISCONSIN 318 16. WASHINGTON 144,21417. MASSACHUSETTS 293 17. CONNECTICUT 318 17. MISSOURI 144,03618. KENTUCKY 241 18. MARYLAND 304 18. MINNESOTA 138,92819. MARYLAND 236 19. CALIFORNIA 301 19. ALABAMA 138,787
20. TENNESSEE 137,70720. MAINE 199 20. MASSACHUSETTS 29421. SOUTH CAROLINA 181 21. COLORP DO 292 21. LOUISIANA 122,43122. COLORADO 172 22. WEST VIRGINIA 252 22. ARIZONA 109,55423. OREGON 167 23. KENTUCKY 241 23. tOWA 108,70724. RHODE ISLAND 147 24. NORTH CAROLINA' 200 24. KENTUCKY 106,018
25. COLORADO 105,86525. ARKANSAS 143 25. MAINE 19926. FLORIDA 138 26. SOUTH CAROLINA 181 26. MARYLAND 104,12427. OKLAHOMA 134 27. OREGON 167 27. OKLAHOMA 99,39728. TENNESSEE 133 28. OKLAHOMA 164 28. SOUTH CAROLINA 95,32429. WEST VIRGINIA 130 29. MISSOURI 161 29. KANSAS 84,906
30. MISSISSIPPI 84,55030. KANSAS 115 30. ARKANSAS 15531. MISSOURI 83 31. RHODE ISLAND 147 31. UTAH 83,20532. NORTH DAKOTA 68 32. TENNESEE 139 32. OREGON 82,56033. TEXAS* 65 33. KANSAS 140 33. CONNECTICUT 65,78934. NORTH CAROLINA' 65 34. LOUISIANA 107 34. ARKANSAS 62,178
35. NEBRASKA 60,51135. LOUISIANA 53 35. NORTH DAKOTA 7936. DELAWARE 46 36. ALABAMA 65 36. WEST VIRGINIA 51,85937. NEBRASKA 45 37. TEXAS' 65 37. RHODE ISLAND 43,01938. NEW HAMPSHIRE 41 38. NEW HAMPSHIRE 61 38. NEW MEXICO 42,59139. ALASKA 39 39. DELAWARE 55 39. NEW HAMPSHIRE 34,466
40. IDAHO 33,46340. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA' 34 40. NEBRASKA 4541. ARIZONA 32 41. ALASKA 39 41. DIST OF COLUMBIA 29,98842. GEORGIA 31 42. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA' 34 42. NORTH DAKOTA 29,23943. SOUTH DAKOTA' 26 43. UTAH 32 43. HAWAII 29,22244. HAWAII 25 44. ARIZONA 32 44. MAINE 29,080
45. MONTANA 27,12745. IDAHO 23 45, IDAHO 3146. NEVADA* 18 46. SOUTH DAKOTA* 29 46. SOUTH DAKOTA 22,78447. ALABAMA 16 47. HAWAII 25 47. DELAWARE 22,43248. MONTANA 15 48. NEVADA' 18 48. VERMONT 21,56449. MISSISSIPPI 15 49. MONTANA 15 49. NEVADA 19,03950. WYOMING 14 50. MISSISSIPPI 15 50 WYOMING 15,78351. UTAH 14 51. WYOMING 14 51. ALASKA 11,488
Figures for these States are from 1993-94 Annual Survey Report.
- 30 - 51
Table Twelve
Estimated Percentage of Full-Time UndergraduatesReceiving Grant Awards in 1994-95, By State
State
Percent ofUndergraduates
ReceivingNeed-Based Aid
Percent ofUndergraduaiss
State Receiving Aid
1. NEW YORK 53.9% 1. GEORGIA 84.8%
2. MINNESOTA 51.3% 2. NEW YORK 54.4%3. VERMONT 45.5% 3. MINNESOTA 51.3%4. NEW JERSEY 42.0% 4. NEW JERSEY 48.8%5. NEW MEXICO 40.6% 5. VERMONT 48.2%
6. PENNSYLVANIA 40.1% 6. OHIO 45.2%7. WISCONSIN 34.9% 7. NEW MEXICO 40.8%8. MAINE 32.9% 8. PENNSYLVANIA 40.3%9. ILLINOIS 32.5% 9. ILLINOIS . 39.9%
10. WASHINGTON 29.6% 10. WISCONSIN 34.9%
11. OHIO 28.9% 11. MAINE 32.9%12. MASSACHUSETTS 28.1% 12. COLORADO 30.0%13. KENTUCKY 26.4% 13. WASHINGTON 29.8%14. RHODE ISLAND 23.9% 14. MASSACHUSETTS 28.1%15. INDIANA 23.6% 15. KENTUCKY 26.4%
NATION" 22.1% 16. VIRGINIA 26.1%16. MARYLAND 22.1% 17. MARYLAND 26.0%17. ARKANSAS 21.7% NATION" 25.3%18. MICHIGAN 20.7% 18. FLORIDA 24.7%19. VIRGINIA 19.9% 19. INDIANA 24.3%20. IOWA 18.2% 20. RHODE ISLAND 23.9%
21. COLORADO 18.0% 21. WEST VIRGINIA 23.5%22. OREGON 17.5% 22. ARKANSAS 22.3%23. CONNECTICUT 16.9% 23. MICHIGAN 21.0%24. TENNESSEE 16.6% 24. IOWA 19.3%25. OKLAHOMA 14.4% 25. OREGON 17.5%
26. NORTH DAKOTA 12.2% 26. CONNECTICUT 17.1%27. FLORIDA 11.5% 27. TENNESSEE 17.0%28. NEBRASKA 10.5% 28. NORTH CAROLINA' 16.1%29. WEST VIRGINIA 10.2% 29. OKLAHOMA 15.7%30. KANSAS 10.0% 30. NORTH DAKOTA 12.4%
31. CALFORNIA 9.9% 31. KANSAS 11.3%32. SOUTH DAKOTA' 9.4% 32. ALABAMA 10.6%33. SOUTH CAROLINA 8.8% 33. NEBRASKA 10.5%34. MISSOURI 6.4% 34. CALIFORNIA 10.1%35. GEORGIA 6.4% 35. SOUTH DAKOTA' 9.6%
36. DELAWARE 6.1% 36. SOUTH CAROLINA 8.8%37. NORTH CAROLINA' 5.6% 37. LOUISIANA 8.4%38. IDAHO 5.4% 38. DELAWARE 7.1%39. TEXAS' 4.8% 39. MISSOURI 6.7%40. LOUISIANA 4.7% 40. IDAHO 5.7%
41. NEW HAMPSHIRE 4.5% 41. TEXAS' 4.8%
42. ALABAMA 3.8% 42. NEW HAMPSHIRE 4.7%43. DIST OF COLUMBIA' 3.8% 43. DIST OF COLUMBIA 3.8%
44. WYOMING' 3.7% 44. WYOMING' 3.7%45. ARIZONA 3.7% 45. ARIZONA 3.7%
46. NEVADA' 3.5% 46. NEVADA' 3.5%47. MONTANA 3.5% 47. MONTANA 3.5%48. ALASKA 2.6% 48. MISSISSIPPI 3.0%49. UTAH 2.5% 49. UTAH 2.9%50. HAWAII' 2.5% 50. ALASKA 2.7%51. MISSISSIPPI 2.4% 51. HAWAII' 2.5%
Figures for these States are f rom 1993-94 Annual Survey Report." Figure for Nation is f rom 1993-94 Annual Survey Report as 1994-95 recipient data for all 51 States
was not available.
5 2- 31 -
Table Thirteen
Total State Grants As A Percentage of Appropriations of State Tax FundsFor Operating Expenses of Higher Education in 1994-95
(S amounts in millions)
State Percent*" StateGrant
Amounts StateAppropriation
Amounts
1. VERMONT 23.0% 1. NEW YORK $656.545 1. CALIFORNIA $4,835.5552. NEW YORK 21.0% 2. CALIFORNIA 395.290 2. NEW YORK 3,124.1223. ILLINOIS 14.4% 3. ILLINOIS 270.322 3. TEXAS 3,087.0544. PENNSYLVANIA 14.0% 4. PENNSYLVANIA 219.184 4. ILLINOIS 1,887.513
5. NEW JERSEY 13.5% 5. NEW JERSEY 169.824 5. NORTH CAROLINA 1,723.3126. GEORGIA 10.5% 6. OHIO 124.516 6. FLORIDA 1,701.4057. MINNESOTA 9.5% 7. GEORGIA 118.157 7. MICHIGAN 1,607.5788. VIRGINIA 8.6% 8. FLORIDA 99.454 8. PENNSYLVANIA 1,578.9289. CALIFORNIA 8.2% 9. MINNESOTA 97.960 9. OHIO 1,568.004
10. OHIO 7.9% 10. NORTH CAROLINA 93.830 10. NEW JERSEY 1,259.452
11. INDIANA 7.5% 11: MICHIGAN 85.605 11. GEORGIA 1,124.628NATION** 7.3% 12. VIRGINIA 83.122 12. MINNESOTA 1,030.819
12. MASSACHUSETTS 6.9% 13. TEXAS* 73.742 13. ALABAMA 1,026.21913. WISCONSIN 6.2% 14. INDIANA 68.162 14. WISCONSIN 979.26914. WEST VIRGINIA 6.2% NATION*** 62.803 15. VIRGINIA 968.149
15. COLORADO 6.1% 15. MASSACHUSETTS 61.945 16. WASHINGTON 942.76716. FLORIDA 5.8% 16. WISCONSIN 60.815 17. INDIANA 923.50817. WASHINGTON 5.8% 17. WASHINGTON 54.214 18. TENNESSEE 897.70418. IOWA 5.6% 18. IOWA 36.183 19. MASSACHUSETTS 895.48819. NORTH CAROLINA 5.4% 19. COLORADO 33.028 NATION**** 859.464
20. MICHIGAN 5.4% 20. MARYLAND 32.127 20. MARYLAND 789.42021. UTAH 5.2% 21. KENTUCKY 25.517 21. MISSOURI 676.04322. RHODE ISLAND 5.1% 22. MISSOURI 23.435 22. ARIZONA 664.09123. CONNECTICUT 4.2% 23. SOUTH CAROLINA 23.340 23. KENTUCKY 657.60924. MARYLAND 4.1% 24. CONNECTICUT 20.905 24. SOUTH CAROLINA 651.526
25. MAINE 4.1% 25. UTAH 20.630 25. IOWA 641.54926. KENTUCKY 3.9% 26. TENNESSEE 19.146 26. MISSISSIPPI 617.02427. SOUTH CAROLINA 3.6% 27. WEST VIRGINIA 18.534 27. LOUISIANA 589.57828. MISSOURI 3.5% 28. OKLAHOMA 18.202 28. COLORADO 544.03429. NEW MEXICO 3.4% 29. NEW MEXICO 14.825 29. OKLAHOMA 540.887
30. OKLAHOMA 3.4% 30. OREGON 13.761 30. KANSAS 509.13531. OREGON 3.2% 31. LOUISIANA 13.091 31. CONNECTICUT 502.34232. NORTH DAKOTA 2.9% 32. KANSAS 12.562 32. NEW MEXICO 437.50233. KANSAS 2.5% 33. VERMONT 12.224 33. OREGON 434.65434. TEXAS* 2.4% 34. ALABAMA 12.108 34. ARKANSAS 425.036
35. ARKANSAS 2.3% 35. ARKANSAS 9.803 35. UTAH 400.37236. LOUISIANA 2.3% 36. MAINE 7.090 36. HAWAII 382.64837. TENNESSEE 2.2% 37. RHODE ISLAND 6.340 37. NEBRASKA 369.56538. NEW HAMPSHIRE 1.8% 38. NORTH DAKOTA 1.181 38. WEST VIRGINIA 303.87439. DELAWARE 1.4% 39. ARIZONA 3.493 39. IDAHO 227.618
40. ALASKA 1.3% 40. NEBRASKA 2.726 40. NEVADA 194.93941. ALABAMA 1.2% 41. MISSISSIPPI 2.555 41. MAINE 174.52342. NEBRASKA 0.7% 42. ALASKA 2.209 42. ALASKA 168.56043. SOUTH DAKOTA* 0.7% 43. DELAWARE 1.835 43. NORTH DAKOTA . 144.27344. ARIZONA 0.5% 44. NEW HAMPSHIRE 1.545 44. DELAWARE 137.432
45. IDAHO 0.5% 45. IDAHO 1.070 45. WYOMING 129.27146. MISSISSIPPI 0.4% 46. HAWAII 0.732 46. RHODE ISLAND 125.13847. MONTANA 0.3% 47. SOUTH DAKOTA* 0.725 47. MONTANA 123.29648. NEVADA* 0.2% 48. MONTANA 0.419 48. SOUTH DAKOTA 111.23549. HAWAII 0.2% 49. NEVADA* 0 402 49. NEW HAMPSHIRE 85 32450. WYOMING 0.2% 50. WYOMING 0.225 50. VERMONT 53.222
Figures are from 1993-94 Annual Survey ReportPercentage equals total grant dollars divided by total tax funds.
*** Amount equals total grant dollars divided by 50.**** Amount equals total tax funds divided by 50.
Source of Tax Fund Data: Center for Higher Education, Illinois State University, Grapevine, October, 1995.
- 32 -53