direct photon interferometry
DESCRIPTION
Direct photon interferometry. D.Peressounko RRC “Kurchatov Institute”. Outlook. Photons are special: Penetrating=> Specific R(K T ) dependence Massless => Unusual R inv and l inv interpretation Rare => Strong background Experimental review Completed experiments - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Direct photon interferometry
D.Peressounko
RRC “Kurchatov Institute”
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 2
Outlook Photons are special:
Penetrating => Specific R(KT) dependence Massless => Unusual Rinv and inv interpretation Rare => Strong background
Experimental review Completed experiments
TAPS,WA98 Ongoing
PHENIX,STAR Developing
ALICE
Conclusions
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 3
Accessing space-time dimensions of different stages of the collision
Pb+Pb @ 17.2 AGeV
Rout Rside Rlong
•3+1 hydro with first order phase transition.•QGP phase includes pre-equilibrium pQCD contribution
D.P. Phys.Rev.Lett.93:022301,2004
QGP
mixed
hadr
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 4
KT dependence of photon correlation radii
RHIC Au+Au @ 200 AGeV
D.P. Phys.Rev.Lett.93:022301,2004
D.Srivastava, Phys.Rev.C71:034905,2005
T.Renk, hep-ph/0408218
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 5
Predictions for correlation radii
System Rout(fm) Rside(fm) Rlong(fm) Rinv(fm)
4.4 4.2 0.2 D.Srivastava, Phys.Rev.C71:034905,2005
4.3 3.9 1.2 3.0 D.Peressounko, Phys.Rev.Lett.93:022301,2004
ee
KT=1 GeV6.0 3.2 3.3* 3.2 J.Alam et al., Phys.Rev.C70:054901,2004
5.5 3.0 1.6* 3.0 J.Alam et al., Phys.Rev.C67:054902,2003
5.1 4.3 2.8 - T.Renk, hep-ph/0408218
*Not LCMS system
RHIC, Au+Au@200 AGeV, KT=2GeV
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 6
Qinv parameterization for massless particles
S(x) = exp( - t2/2 – x2/Ro2 - y2/Rs
2 - z2/Rl2),
C2(qo,qs,ql)=1 + exp( -qo2(Ro
2 +22) -qs2Rs
2 -ql2Rl
2)
C2(Qinv)=
∫d3q/qe C2(qo,qs,ql) (Qinv2+q2)
∫d3q/qe (Qinv2+q2)
= 1/(4)∫[1+ exp{-Qinv2(K0
2/M2cos2 (Ro2+22) + Rs
2 sin2sin2 + Rl2sin2cos2 ) }] d
= 1+invexp{-Qinv2Rinv
2)
Rinv = <Rs,Rl> (not Ro!) inv = 1/(4) ∫exp{ - 4KT2(Ro
2 + 2)cos2}d
For massless particles (,e) Qinv parameterization is very special!
(integrate in CM frame of the pair)
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 7
Qinv parameterization for massless particles (MC)
Set 1: Ro = 6 Rs = 6 Rl = 6
Set 2: Ro = 4 Rs = 6 Rl = 6
Set 3: Ro = 2 Rs = 6 Rl = 6
Set 4: Ro = 6 Rs = 4 Rl = 6
Set 5: Ro = 6 Rs = 2 Rl = 6
Set 6: Ro = 6 Rs = 4 Rl = 4
Set 7: Ro = 4 Rs = 4 Rl = 4
Set 8: Ro = 2 Rs = 4 Rl = 4
Set 9: Ro = 6 Rs = 2 Rl = 2
inv = Erf(2KT√Ro2 + 2)/(2KT√Ro
2 + 2)
inv=1/(2KT√Ro2 + 2)
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 8
Background photon correlations Bose-Einstein 0 correlations
Resonance decays
Collective flow
0
0
}
0
0
0
}
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 9
0 BE residual correlations
D.P. Phys.Rev.Lett.93:022301,2004
R=4 fm
R=5 fm
R=6 fm
C2=1+exp(-Qinv
2R2)
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 10
0 BE residual correlations
A.Deloff and T.Siemiarczuk,ALICE internal note INT-98-50
=1/2(k1-k2)
C2()=1+/(1+2R
2)2
dN/dp=p·epx(-p/[3GeV])
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 11
0 BE residual correlations
O.V.Utyuzh, G.Wilk, Nukleonika 49:S15 (2004), hep-ph/0312364
Varying width (and strength) Varying strength
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 12
TAPS: detector setup
BaF2 25 cm long (12 X0) prism of hexagonal cross section, the diameter of the inner circle being 5.9 cm (69% of the Moliere radius).
Min angle cut between photons 8.30
Distance to IP 62 cm
Typical photon energy ~10 MeV
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 13
TAPS: m distribution and C2
Geantsimulations
86Kr+natNi @ 60 AMeV 181Ta+197Au @ 40 AMeV
Comparison to BUU calculations
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 14
Number of events collected: Peripheral (20% min bias) 3897935Central (10% min bias) 5817217
WA98 setup
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 15
Two photon correlation functions
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 16
WA98: apparatus effectsLmin = 20 cm (5 modules)
Lmin = 25 cm (6 modules)
Lmin = 30 cm (7 modules)
Lmin = 35 cm (9 modules)
200 < KT < 300 MeV
100 < KT < 200 MeV
100 < KT < 200 MeV
200 < KT < 300 MeV
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 17
Hadrons and photon conversion
“Narrow” (16 + 1)% (4 + 1)%
“Neutral” ( 1 + 4)% (1 + 4)%
“All” (37 + 4)% (22 + 4)%
“Narrow neutral” (1 + 1)% (1 + 1)%
obs = =1 (N
dir)2
2 (Ntot + cont)2
Contamination, (charged + neutral)
100<KT<200 200<KT<300pid
true
(1+ cont/ Ntot)2
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 18
Photon background correlations
00 Bose-Einstein correlations:
Slope: -(4.5±0.4)·10-3 (GeV-1)
Elliptic flow:
Slope: -(3.1±0.4)·10-3 (GeV-1)
Decays of resonances:
K0s→20→4
K0L→30→6
→30→6→0→3
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 19
C2(Qinv) =1 + /(4) ∫ do exp{ - Qinv2 (Rs
2 sin2 sin2 + Rl2 sin2 cos2 )
- (Qinv2 + 4KT
2)cos2 Ro2 } R
Rlong
Rside
Rinv = f(Rs,Rl)
inv = Erf(2KTRo)
2KTRo
(for massless particles!)
Invariant correlation radius
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 20
Subtraction method,upper limit
Yield of direct photons
Correlation method:
Subtraction method
Predictions
hadronic gasQGP
sumpQCD
Predictions:S. Turbide, R. Rapp, and C. Gale, hep-ph/0308085.
Ndir = N
total √2
inv = Erf(2KTRo)
2KTRo
Most probable yield (Ro=6 fm)The lowest yield (Ro=0)
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 21
PHENIX setup
Lead ScintillatorLead + scintillatingplates of 5.5*5.5 cm2 at a distance 510 cm from IP.
Lead GlassPbGl crystals4*4 cm2 cross sectiondistance 550 cm from IP
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 22
PHENIX: Comparison to data
d+Au collisions at √sNN=200 GeV
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 23
STAR
Use 1 gamma in TPC, 1 gamma in calorimeter.
A procedure has been developed which permits the measurement of gamma-gamma HBT signals despite the large background of gammas from π0 mesons
Gamma energy > 1.0 GeV is required for the residual π0 correlation to be “small”
“No HBT” calculation may be needed but appears to be doable.
Conclusions from the talk of J. Sandweiss on “RHIC-AGS users meeting”, June 21, 2005, BNL:
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 24
ALICE setup
PHOS:crystals PbW04
2*2 cm cross section Distance to IP 460 cm
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 25
ALICE: unfolding and resolution
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 26
ALICE: photon correlations in HIJING event
Kt=200 MeV
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 27
Summary Direct photon and electron interferometry is
rather special subject due to penetrating nature, zero mass and low yield.
Two-photon correlations were observed in two experiments up to now.
Photon correlations are analyzed now at PHENIX and STAR.
PHOS detector at ALICE is very promising tool due to fine granularity and high spatial and energy resolutions.
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 28
PHENIX: MC simulations
Kt = 0.2 GeV
Using measured spectra and yields for 0, kaons and
K+→
K0S→
K0L→30
→30
c=4.7 m
c=15. m
c=0.02 m
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 29
Jan-e Alam et al., ee correlations
J.Alam et al., Phys.Rev.C70:054901,2004
KT=1 GeV
Not LCMS
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 30
T.RenkSide
Long
side
out
T.Renk, hep-ph/0408218
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 31
Penetrating probes: probe all stages?
RHIC Au+Au @ 200 AGeV
D.P. Phys.Rev.Lett.93:022301,2004
D.Peressounko, WPCF, Kromeriz, 2005 32
Possible sources of distortion of correlation function
Apparatus effects (cluster splitting and merging) Hadron misidentification Photon conversion Photon background correlations:
Bose-Einstein correlations of parent 0; Collective (elliptic) flow; Residual correlations due to decays of resonances;