digital libraries
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
11/12/200811/12/2008 11
SEMANTIC WEB SEMANTIC WEB OPPORTUNITIES OPPORTUNITIES
FOR DIGITAL LIBRARIESFOR DIGITAL LIBRARIES
Enrique HerreraEnrique Herrera--ViedmaViedmaPamplona, Pamplona, DecemberDecember 20082008
11/12/200811/12/2008 22
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
11/12/200811/12/2008 33
DIGITAL LIBRARIES (DL)DIGITAL LIBRARIES (DL)
TRADITIONAL TRADITIONAL GoalGoal ofof DL:DL:offeroffer accessaccess toto largelarge amountsamounts ofof
contentcontent in in formform ofof digital digital documentsdocuments
((booksbooks, , journalsjournals))
QuestionQuestion::DL DL havehave toto makemake theirtheir informationinformation
sourcessources availableavailable toto a a widerwideraudienceaudience
11/12/200811/12/2008 44
DIGITAL LIBRARIES (DL)DIGITAL LIBRARIES (DL)
TRADITIONAL PROBLEM: TRADITIONAL PROBLEM:
HOW TO ALLOW AN EASY ACCESS TO THE HOW TO ALLOW AN EASY ACCESS TO THE USER INFORMATION NEEDS?USER INFORMATION NEEDS?
SOLUTION:SOLUTION:APPLICATION OF WEB TECHNOLOGIES APPLICATION OF WEB TECHNOLOGIES ((ProcessingProcessing, , disseminationdissemination, , storagestorage, , searchsearch
andand analysisanalysis ofof allall typestypes ofof digital digital informatoninformaton))
11/12/200811/12/2008 55
EVOLUTION OF DIGITAL EVOLUTION OF DIGITAL LIBRARIESLIBRARIES
11/12/200811/12/2008 66
WEB TECHNOLOGIES APPLIED IN DLWEB TECHNOLOGIES APPLIED IN DLThreeThree kindskinds ofof webweb technologiestechnologies::
•• APPLYING TECHNOLOGIES WEB 1.0: APPLYING TECHNOLOGIES WEB 1.0:
DIGITAL LIBRARY 1.0 DIGITAL LIBRARY 1.0 (THE PAST)(THE PAST)
•• APPLYING TECHNOLOGIES WEB 2.0: APPLYING TECHNOLOGIES WEB 2.0:
DIGITAL LIBRARY 2.0 DIGITAL LIBRARY 2.0 (THE PRESENT)(THE PRESENT)
•• APPLYING TECHNOLOGIES FROM THE WEB 3.0:APPLYING TECHNOLOGIES FROM THE WEB 3.0:
DIGITAL LIBRARY 3.0 DIGITAL LIBRARY 3.0 (THE FUTURE)(THE FUTURE)
11/12/200811/12/2008 77
DIGITAL LIBRARY 1.0DIGITAL LIBRARY 1.0
11/12/200811/12/2008 88
BASIC CONCEPTS IN WEB 1.0 BASIC CONCEPTS IN WEB 1.0 andand DL 1.0DL 1.0
•• TheThe webweb as a as a portal portal ofof informationinformation
•• FocusedFocused onon informationinformation ofof thethe sitessitesexclusivelyexclusively
•• BasedBased onon owningowning contentcontent
•• DrawbacksDrawbacks::•• InteractionInteraction•• ScalabilityScalability
11/12/200811/12/2008 99
DIGITAL LIBRARY 2.0DIGITAL LIBRARY 2.0
11/12/200811/12/2008 1010
BASIC CONCEPTS IN WEB 2.0BASIC CONCEPTS IN WEB 2.0From the OFrom the O’’Reilly pieceReilly piece::““A core concept of Web 2.0 is that A core concept of Web 2.0 is that people people
are the content of sitesare the content of sites. That is, a site is . That is, a site is not populated with information for users to not populated with information for users to consume. Instead, services are provided to consume. Instead, services are provided to individual users for them to build networks individual users for them to build networks of friends and other groups (professional, of friends and other groups (professional, recreational, etc.). recreational, etc.). The content of a site The content of a site then, comprises userthen, comprises user--provided provided information that attracts new members information that attracts new members of an everof an ever--expanding networkexpanding network..””
11/12/200811/12/2008 1111
BASIC CONCEPTS IN WEB 2.0BASIC CONCEPTS IN WEB 2.0•• TheThe webweb as a as a platformplatform ofof servicesservices
•• FocusedFocused onon useruser communitiescommunities ((createcreate andand validatevalidatecontentcontent))
•• BasedBased onon sharingsharing contentcontent
• Emphasis on ease of use
•• BasedBased onon InteractivityInteractivity
•• DrawbacksDrawbacks::•• PersonalizationPersonalization•• TrueTrue portabilityportability•• InteroperatibilityInteroperatibility
11/12/200811/12/2008 1212
2.02.0--stylestyle ServiceService ExamplesExamplesBlogging
User tagging
Folksonomies
User comments
User ratings
RSS feeds
Feed aggregators
Wikis
Skypecasts
Community citationservices
Community photo services
Community book services
IDEA:IDEA: TO APPLY THESE TOOLS in TO APPLY THESE TOOLS in DLsDLs
11/12/200811/12/2008 1313
Digital Digital LibraryLibrary 2.0: 2.0: PropertiesProperties
The library is everywhereThe library is everywhere
The library has no barriersThe library has no barriers
The library invites participationThe library invites participation
The library uses flexible, bestThe library uses flexible, best--ofof--breed, breed, componentcomponent--based systemsbased systems
The library is a humanThe library is a human--centered organizationcentered organization
11/12/200811/12/2008 1414
Digital Digital LibraryLibrary 1.0 versus Digital 1.0 versus Digital LibraryLibrary 2.0 2.0
Digital Library 1.0 is a Digital Library 1.0 is a pullpull modelmodel•• Acquire / store / lend / findAcquire / store / lend / find
Digital Library 2.0 is a Digital Library 2.0 is a pushpush modelmodel•• Acquire / store / Acquire / store / broadcastbroadcast / / converseconverse
PROBLEMS OF DL 2.0:PROBLEMS OF DL 2.0:•• PERSONALIZATIONPERSONALIZATION•• INTEROPERATIBILITYINTEROPERATIBILITY
11/12/200811/12/2008 1515
DIGITAL LIBRARY 3.0DIGITAL LIBRARY 3.0
11/12/200811/12/2008 1616
BASIC CONCEPTS IN WEB 3.0 BASIC CONCEPTS IN WEB 3.0
11/12/200811/12/2008 1717
WhatWhat isis thethe SemanticSemantic Web?Web?
•• An extension of the current Web in which An extension of the current Web in which information is given wellinformation is given well--defined meaning, defined meaning, better enabling computers and people to better enabling computers and people to work in cooperation. [work in cooperation. [Tim BernersTim Berners--LeeLee]]
•• Semantic Web is able to describe things in Semantic Web is able to describe things in a way that computers can understanda way that computers can understand
11/12/200811/12/2008 1818
ToolsTools ofof SemanticSemantic Web:Web:
•• RDFRDF (Resource Description Framework): (Resource Description Framework): AAfundamental fundamental datadata formatformat for describing for describing information and resources. Putting information information and resources. Putting information into RDF files makes it possible for into RDF files makes it possible for ““scuttersscutters”” or or RDF crawlers to RDF crawlers to search, discover, pick up, search, discover, pick up, collectcollect, , analyseanalyse and and processprocess information from information from the Webthe Web
•• Ontology languagesOntology languages for for modelingmodeling de data de data sourcesource’’s semantics: RDFs semantics: RDF SchemaSchema, OWL, , OWL, ectect..
•• IDEA:IDEA: TO APPLY THESE TOOLS in TO APPLY THESE TOOLS in DLsDLs
11/12/200811/12/2008 1919
SemanticSemantic Web Technologies Web Technologies forfor DLsDLs::
MetadataMetadata is the keyis the key conceptconceptthe Web the Web does not havedoes not have metadatametadata•• the idea of a Semantic Web is nice but difficult to the idea of a Semantic Web is nice but difficult to implementimplement
DLsDLs do havedo have metadata in place:metadata in place:•• We must make them available in a machine understandable formatWe must make them available in a machine understandable format•• Semantic Web provides the format: RDF Semantic Web provides the format: RDF
DLsDLs already havealready have controlled vocabularies, taxonomies controlled vocabularies, taxonomies or even or even ontologiesontologies in place:in place:•• We have to model this knowledge in a machine understandable wayWe have to model this knowledge in a machine understandable way•• Semantic Web provides Semantic Web provides ontologyontology languagelanguages:s: RDFRDF SchemaSchema oror OWLOWL
11/12/200811/12/2008 2020
DL 3.0 DL 3.0 basedbased onon SemanticSemantic Web= Web= SEMANTIC DLSEMANTIC DL
•• integrateintegrate information based on different metadata, e.g.: information based on different metadata, e.g.: resources, user profiles, bookmarks, taxonomiesresources, user profiles, bookmarks, taxonomies –– high high quality semantics = highly and meaningfully connected quality semantics = highly and meaningfully connected informationinformation
•• provide provide interoperabilityinteroperability with other systems (not only digital with other systems (not only digital libraries) on either metadata or communication level or both libraries) on either metadata or communication level or both –– RDF as common denominator between digital libraries and RDF as common denominator between digital libraries and other servicesother services
•• delivering more robust, delivering more robust, user friendly and adaptable search user friendly and adaptable search and browsingand browsing interfaces empowered by semanticsinterfaces empowered by semantics
11/12/200811/12/2008 2121
SemanticSemantic DL: DL: EvolvingEvolving KnowledgeKnowledge SpaceSpace
In stateIn state--ofof--thethe--art digital libraries users are art digital libraries users are consumersconsumers•• Retrieve contents based on available bibliographic recordsRetrieve contents based on available bibliographic records (DL 1.0)(DL 1.0)
Recent trends: Recent trends: user communitiesuser communities (DL 2.0)(DL 2.0)•• ConneteaConnetea•• FlickrFlickr
In Semantic In Semantic DLDL users are users are consumersconsumers//contributerscontributers//advisorsadvisors•• Tagging (Web 2.0)Tagging (Web 2.0)•• Social Semantic Collaborative Filtering Social Semantic Collaborative Filtering •• AnnotationsAnnotations
SemanticSemantic DDLL enforce the enforce the transition from a static information to a transition from a static information to a dynamic (collaborative) knowledge spacedynamic (collaborative) knowledge space
11/12/200811/12/2008 2222
SemanticSemantic DLsDLs: BENEFITS: BENEFITS
TThe two main benefits of Semantic DL: he two main benefits of Semantic DL: new search paradigmsnew search paradigms for the information for the information spacespace•• OntologyOntology--based search / facet searchbased search / facet search•• CommunityCommunity--enabled browsingenabled browsing
providing interoperabilityproviding interoperability on the data levelon the data level•• integratingintegrating metadata from various heterogeneous metadata from various heterogeneous
sourcessources•• InterconnectingInterconnecting different digital library systemsdifferent digital library systems
11/12/200811/12/2008 2323
SemanticSemantic Digital Digital LibrariesLibraries: : ExamplesExamples
JeromeDLJeromeDL•• a social semantic digital library makes use of Semantic Web and a social semantic digital library makes use of Semantic Web and
Social Networking technologies to enhance both interoperability Social Networking technologies to enhance both interoperability and and usabilityusability
BRICKSBRICKS•• aims at establishing the organizational and technological foundaaims at establishing the organizational and technological foundations tions
for a digital library network in order to share knowledge and for a digital library network in order to share knowledge and resources in the cultural heritage domain.resources in the cultural heritage domain.
FEDORAFEDORA•• delivers flexible servicedelivers flexible service--oriented architecture to managing and oriented architecture to managing and
delivering content in the form of digital objectsdelivering content in the form of digital objects
SIMILESIMILE•• extends and extends and laverageslaverages DSpaceDSpace, seeking to enhance interoperability , seeking to enhance interoperability
among digital assets, schemata, metadata, and servicesamong digital assets, schemata, metadata, and services
11/12/200811/12/2008 2424
TRENDTREND
11/12/200811/12/2008 2525
FromFrom SemanticSemantic DL DL toto Social Social SemanticSemantic DLDL
ChallengeChallenge:: To get SOCIAL SEMANTIC DLTo get SOCIAL SEMANTIC DL
•• ItIt´́ss the following step towards DL 3.0the following step towards DL 3.0
•• Advantages:Advantages:Collaborative search and browsing (interface)Collaborative search and browsing (interface)
Users contribute to the classification processUsers contribute to the classification process
Users can understand community driven annotationsUsers can understand community driven annotations
Users enhance digital content using Users enhance digital content using blogsblogs, , wikiswikis on the sideon the side
•• Drawbacks:Drawbacks:Not everyone is convincedNot everyone is convinced
11/12/200811/12/2008 2626
THANK YOU FOR YOUR THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTIONATTENTION