developing critical thinkers

21
DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS Stephen Brookfield Distinguished University Professor University of St. Thomas www.stephenbrookfield.com

Upload: bat

Post on 05-Jan-2016

57 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS. Stephen Brookfield Distinguished University Professor University of St. Thomas www.stephenbrookfield.com. CORE ASSUMPTIONS. Sincerity of Assumptions Does NOT Equate with Students’ Goodwill Good Teaching = Whatever Helps Our Students Learn - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

DEVELOPINGCRITICAL THINKERS

Stephen Brookfield

Distinguished University Professor

University of St. Thomas

www.stephenbrookfield.com

Page 2: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

CORE ASSUMPTIONS

Sincerity of Assumptions Does NOT Equate with Students’ Goodwill

Good Teaching = Whatever Helps Our Students Learn

Best Practice is Critically Reflective – Checking Our Assumptions About Practice

Most Important Pedagogic Knowledge – How Students Experience Learning

Page 3: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

CIRCLE OF VOICES • Each person has up to 1 minute to say

whatever they wish to say on the topic – no interruptions allowed. Once all have spoken the group moves into ..

• Open conversation: here you only talk about what someone else said in the opening round

• WHAT’S THE MOST RECENT EXAMPLE OF CRITICAL THINKING YOU’VE SEEN OR PRACTICED?

Page 4: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

WHAT IS IT? 4 FUNCTIONS• IDENTIFYING OUR ASSUMPTIONS

• CHECKING THEIR ACCURACY & VALIDITY

• VIEWING IDEAS & ACTIONS FROM ALTERNATE PERSPECTIVES

• TAKING INFORMED ACTION - THE SURVIVAL SKILL OF ADULT LIFE

Page 5: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

WHY FOCUS ON IT?To Take Informed Action

• Action Based on Evidence That Can be Cited & Considered By Others

• Action That Can be Explained & Justified• Action That Has Its Assumptions Known &

Checked• Action That Stands a Chance of Achieving

Its Intended Consequence• Action That’s In Our Best Interest

Page 6: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

INFORMED ACTION = APPLYING & EXTENDING

KNOWLEDGE• Deciding that an idea or practice has utility or

‘fit’ in an area outside its original formulation• Deciding an idea or practice is indeed

appropriate for a context• Learning to recognize the cues in situations

that call forth certain ideas & practices• Understanding that informed action needs

new knowledge

Page 7: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

TYPES OF ASSUMPTIONS

• CAUSAL - purports to explain a sequence of events

• PRESCRIPTIVE - assumptions about how we wish things to be

• PARADIGMATIC - framing, structuring assumptions viewed as obvious, natural, common sense

Page 8: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

WHEN WE SCRUTINIZE ASSUMPTIONS WE …

• ANALYZE OUR PRACTICES & IDEAS FOR SIGNIFICANT CUES THAT CAUSE US TO JUDGE AN ASSUMPTION FITS

• MAKE JUDGMENTS CONCERNING

THE ACCURACY & RELIABILITY OF

EVIDENCE

Page 9: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

WHEN WE SEE THINGS FROM DIFFERENT VIEWPOINTS WE ...

UNDERSTAND BETTER HOW INFORMATION FROM ONE SOURCE OR CATEGORY FITS

WITH INFORMATION FROM OTHERS

INTEGRATE OUR ACTIONS WITH THOSE OF OTHERS

KNOW HOW TO COMMUNICATE IDEAS TO OTHERS

Page 10: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

Circular Response• 1st person responds to question for up

to a minute – no interruptions.• 2nd person responds to 1st person’s

comments, 3rd person responds to 2nd person’s comments, and so on.

• When everyone has spoken group moves into open conversation.

WHAT MOST HELPS YOUR STUDENTS LEARN CRITICAL THINKING?

Page 11: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

WHEN IS IT BEST TAUGHT?WHEN IS IT BEST TAUGHT?

Beyond the Novice Level After Initial Assimilation When Classroom Skills and

Knowledge Have to be Applied in the ‘Real’ World

When Independent Judgment is Called For

Beyond the Novice Level After Initial Assimilation When Classroom Skills and

Knowledge Have to be Applied in the ‘Real’ World

When Independent Judgment is Called For

Page 12: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

WHEN IS IT BEST TAUGHT?WHEN IS IT BEST TAUGHT?

When Alternative Explanations and Interpretations are Possible

When Actions, Decisions, & Judgments Need to be Informed

When Thinking on Your Feet & Improvisation is Called For

When Alternative Explanations and Interpretations are Possible

When Actions, Decisions, & Judgments Need to be Informed

When Thinking on Your Feet & Improvisation is Called For

Page 13: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

CRITICAL INCIDENT QUESTIONNAIRECRITICAL INCIDENT QUESTIONNAIRE

Moment Most Engaged Moment Most Distanced Action Most Helpful Action Most Puzzling What Surprised You Most

Moment Most Engaged Moment Most Distanced Action Most Helpful Action Most Puzzling What Surprised You Most

Page 14: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

CRITICAL INCIDENT QUESTIONNAIRECRITICAL INCIDENT QUESTIONNAIRE

Anonymous Report Back at Start of Next Class Responsiveness Not Capitulation Early Warning System Illustrates Diversity in Classroom Models Critical Thinking

Anonymous Report Back at Start of Next Class Responsiveness Not Capitulation Early Warning System Illustrates Diversity in Classroom Models Critical Thinking

Page 15: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

Snowballing Share responses in pairs Pairs join to share as quartets Quartets join to share as octets At each stage groups share emerging

issues, questions & differences

Question – HOW DO YOU MODEL CRITICAL THINKING FOR YOUR STUDENTS?

Page 16: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

WHAT STUDENTS SAY IS HELPFUL - MODELING … Seeing it MODELED & Named When Teachers Talk Out Loud Their

Assumptions Behind Practices When Teachers Do Regular Assumption

Audits – “Here are my assumptions I’m working under”

When Teachers Say When Their Assumptions are Confirmed & Challenged

Page 17: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

MODELING …

When Teachers Use the CIQ to Check Assumptions in Front of Students

When Teachers Bring in Real Life Experience When Assumptions Were Confirmed & Challenged

In Team Teaching – When Members Take Different Positions and Clarify Each Others’ Assumptions

Page 18: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

MODELING … When Teachers Critique Their Own

Positions - Moving Around the Classroom

When Teachers ‘Speak in Tongues’ at Different Stations in the Classroom

When Teachers Consistently Discuss Their Criteria for Judging Credibility of Authoritative Sources

Page 19: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

WHAT SHOULD WE REMEMBER AS

TEACHERS?• Modeling, Modeling, Modeling• Resistance is Normal &

Predictable• Critical Thinking is Incremental

- Start Well Away From the Student’s Reasoning & Actions, Help them Learn Critical Protocols, and Over Time Move Closer and Closer to the Student’s Own Reasoning & Actions

Page 20: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

WHAT SHOULD WE REMEMBER?

• BUILD A CASE USING FORMER RESISTERS WHEN POSSIBLE

• FOCUS ON SPECIFIC EXPERIENCES

• CRITICAL THINKING IS A SOCIAL LEARNING PROCESS – PEERS AS CRITICAL MIRRORS

Page 21: DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS

Stephen Brookfield BooksDeveloping Critical Thinkers (1987)Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher

(1995)The Power of Critical Theory (2004)Discussion as a Way of Teaching (2005,

2nd Ed.) with Stephen PreskillThe Skillful Teacher (2006, 2nd. Ed.) All published by Jossey Bass, San Francisco Home Page: www.stephenbrookfield.com