determination of tripamide in human urine by high-performance liquid chromatography and...
TRANSCRIPT
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003; 17: 301–306
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/rcm.913
Determination of Tripamide in human urine by
high-performance liquid chromatography and
high-performance liquid chromatography/
electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry
Yunje Kim*, Joungboon Hwang, Myungsoo Kim and Won LeeDoping Control Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, PO Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul, Korea2Research Institute of Basic Science and Department of Chemistry, KyungHee University, Seoul, Korea
Received 31 July 2002; Revised 28 November 2002; Accepted 5 December 2002
Tripamide is a drug widely used in clinical practice for the treatment of hypertension and edema.
This work evaluated a screening method for Tripamide and its urinary metabolites in human urine,
using high-performance liquid chromatography diode-array detection (HPLC/DAD). Identification
of these metabolites was investigated by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray
ionization tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI-MS/MS) after dosing with 15 mg Tripamide.
Acid hydrolysis showed that Tripamide is conjugated in the body. Two suspected metabolites
were detected by HPLC/DAD. HPLC/ESI-MS/MS analysis suggested that these metabolites were
probably hydroxylated together with loss of the -NH2 group and dehydrogenation. These results
will be useful in confirmation methods for Tripamide in doping control. Copyright # 2003 John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Diuretic agents are drugs that increase renal excretion of
water and solutes (mainly sodium salts). The major purposes
of diuretic therapy are to decrease fluid volume in the body,
and to adjust the water and electrolyte balance. Diuretics are
often used in the management of pathological conditions
such as edema (e.g. in congestive heart failure and certain
renal disorders) and hypertension.1–4 Most diuretics exert
their effects by inhibiting tubular sodium and water reab-
sorption by epithelial cells lining the renal tubule system.
Certain diuretics (such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors,
loop diuretics, thiazide-like diuretics and potassium-sparing
diuretics) suppress sodium and water reabsorption by inhi-
biting the function of specific proteins that are responsible
for (or participate in) the transportation of electrolytes across
the epithelial membrane; osmotic diuretics inhibit water and
sodium reabsorption by increasing intratubular osmotic
pressure. Different types of diuretics may inhibit different
transporters in different segments of the tubular system.5,6
Recently, diuretics have been abused in sports with weight
classes, such as weightlifting, wrestling and boxing. Athletes
try to reduce their body weight in order to qualify for lower
weight classes. It is also reported that athletes use diuretics to
avoid detection of doping agents by reducing their urine
concentration.7 As a part of their effort to fight drug abuse in
sports (doping), the Medical Commission of the International
Olympic Committee has banned diuretics since the 1988
Olympic Games. Tripamide is a sulfonamide-derived anti-
hypertensive agent that has been shown to possess diuretic
properties more consistent with the action of the loop
diuretics than with those of the thiazides.8 Although
Tripamide, like thiazide diuretics, is not listed as yet, it is
possible that will be put on the list.
Metabolite monitoring is important for the determination
of any medication by drugs in doping tests. Several
chromatographic methods have been reported for the
separation, detection, and quantitative measurement of
individual diuretic agents in biological fluids. Published
methods included those based on thin-layer chromatography
(TLC),9 gas-liquid chromatography (GLC),10 gas chromato-
graphy/mass spectrometry (GC/MS),10,11 high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC),12–16 and high-performance
liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS).17
Generally, metabolites in urine are polar so it is not easy to use
GC/MS without derivatization.
Recently, HPLC with detection by tandem mass spectro-
metry (HPLC/MS/MS) has been used for trace level
bioanalysis. This technique allows highly sensitive determi-
nation without the need for derivatization as required for
GC/MS. It is also possible to devise methods specific for
metabolites and structurally similar compounds.
This paper describes an HPLC/DAD screening proce-
dure and an HPLC/MS/MS confirmation procedure for
Tripamide in human urine.
Copyright # 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
*Correspondence to: Y. Kim, Doping Control Center, Korea Insti-tute of Science and Technology, PO Box 131, Cheongryang,Seoul, Korea.E-mail: [email protected]
EXPERIMENTAL
ReagentsTripamide (N-aza-endo-tricyclo[5,2,1,0]decan-4-yl)-4-chloro-
3-sulfamoyl benzamide) was purchased from Eisai Co., Ltd.
(Tokyo, Japan); its purity was 98.5%. Tripamol tablets were
purchased from Hanil Pharm. Ind. Co. Ltd. (Suwon, Korea).
The internal standard (ISTD, ethyl theophylline) was pre-
pared in the Doping Control Center, Korea Institute of
Science and Technology, Seoul. Anhydrous sodium sulfate
was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (MO, USA) and
HCl was from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). b-Glucuroni-
dase and b-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase were purchased
from Roche Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN, USA). Diethyl
ether, methanol, ethyl acetate, methylene chloride, and
chloroform were analytical grade from J. T. Baker (Phillips-
burg, NJ, USA). Phosphate buffer solution (0.2 M), used as
mobile phase for HPLC, was made from KH2PO4 and
K3PO4 purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. Acetonitrile
from J. T. Baker and distilled water were used after filtering
through a Millipore filter (0.5 and 0.45 mm, respectively) and
sonication for 20 min.
Instrument and equipmentA Hewlett-Packard (Palo Alto, CA, USA) HP 1100 series liquid
chromatograph, coupled with a HP 1100 series G1315A diode-
array detector, was used to screen for Tripamide. The column
for HPLC was a Capcell Pack C18 column (2.0 mm F�150 mm, particle size 5 mm). The HPLC/ESI-MS/MS system
consisted of an HP 1100 series binary pump HPLC system
(Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with an LC/MSD ion trap
equipped with an electrospray ionization source (Agilent,
Palo Alto, CA, USA). It was used for confirmation of Tripa-
mide and characterization of suspected metabolites. A Lauda
(Lauda-Konigshofen, Germany) Ecoline RE112 freezer was
used to freeze the aqueous layer. A Turbovap1 LV evaporator
supplied by Zymark Corporation (Hopkinton, MA, USA) was
used to evaporate the extracted organic solvents to dryness.
HydrolysisHydrolysis of glucuronides in urine was evaluated using b-
glucuronidase (from E. coli), b-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase
(from Helix pomatia), and chemical hydrolysis using 6 M
HCl. Hydrolysis by b-glucuronidase (from E. coli) was per-
formed as follows: 5 mL urine were adjusted to pH 7 with
KH2PO4/K3PO4 after adding 15 mL ISTD (50 mg/mL); then
50 mL b-glucuronidase (from E. coli) were added and the mix-
ture was incubated at 558C for 1 h. Hydrolysis with b-glucur-
onidase/arylsulfatase (from Helix pomatia) was performed as
follows: 5 mL urine were adjusted to pH 5.2 with 1 mL 1 N
acetate buffer after adding 15 mL ISTD (50 mg/mL), and
then incubated at 378C for 24 h. NaH2PO4 and Na2HPO4
were then added to adjust the pH to 7. Hydrolysis with 6 M
HCl was performed as follows: to 5 mL urine was added 1 mL
6 M HCl after adding 15 mL ISTD (50 mg/mL); then the mix-
ture was heated at 1058C for 30 min, after which 5 M KOH was
added to adjust the pH to 7.
Urine extractionAfter hydrolysis, anhydrous sodium sulfate (2 g) was added
to the urine. After vortexing, distilled diethyl ether was
added. After shaking for 20 min and centrifugation at
2500 rpm for 5 min, the solution was frozen in the freezer
(�308C). The organic phase was transferred to another tube
and evaporated to dryness at 408C under a gentle stream of
nitrogen. The residue was then reconstituted with 200 mL
methanol, of which 5 mL were injected onto the HPLC/
DAD and HPLC/ESI-MS/MS system.
Volunteer sampleOne healthy man (age 29; weight 75 kg) was given one Tripa-
mol tablet (Tripamide, 15 mg/tablet). Urine samples were
collected for 48 h post-dosing and subjected to the screening
procedure. These urine samples were kept at 2–38C.
Analysis of Tripamide and its metabolites byHPLC/DAD and HPLC/ESI-MS/MSHPLC/DAD operating conditions are described in Table 1.
Operating conditions for HPLC/ESI-MS/MS, used for the
confirmation of Tripamide and for the characterization of
suspected metabolites, are described in Table 2. Mass spec-
trometry and tandem mass spectrometry analyses were per-
formed using a LC/MSD ion trap mass spectrometer. The
entire column eluent was directly introduced into an electro-
spray ionization (ESI) interface through a 50 cm long PEEK
tubing (0.13 mm i.d.).
Table 1. HPLC/DAD operating conditions
Flow rate: 0.3 mL/minMobile phase
Solvent A: phosphatebuffer (pH 6.8)Solvent B: acetonitrile
Gradient time table:Time (min) 0 5 10 20 30A solvent (%) 85 85 80 55 50B solvent (%) 15 15 20 45 50
Column temperature: 458CDetection wavelength: 230 nmInjection volume: 5 mLColumn:
Capcell Pak, Type UG120, C18(Particle size 5 mm, 2.0 mm x 150 mm)
Table 2. HPLC/ESI-MS/MS operating conditions
HPLC conditionsMobile phase
Solvent A: H2OSolvent B: acetonitrile
Gradient time table:Time (min) 0 5 10 20 30Solvent A (%) 85 85 80 55 50Solvent B (%) 15 15 20 45 50
MS conditionsIonization: ESI (electrospray ionization)Mode: positive ionMass range: m/z 50–700Nebulizing gas pressure: 40 psi (N2)Drying gas temp.: 3508CDrying gas flow: 9.00 L/minCapillary exit voltage: 70.9 eVIsolation mass: 370, 386Amplitude: 0.95, 0.9Mass range: m/z 100–500Collision gas: He (70 psi)
Copyright # 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003; 17: 301–306
302 Y. Kim et al.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Detection of Tripamide by HPLC/DADThe molecular weight of tripamide is 369.09 Da and its struc-
ture, together with that of the internal standard (ethyl theo-
phylline), is shown in Fig. 1. This internal standard is
commonly used in doping control for caffeine and diuretics
at this laboratory. It was used here to check the retention
time in HPLC. Tripamide is a sulfonamide diuretic and has
a high boiling point and polarity. A chromatogram of a Tripa-
mide standard and its UV spectrum are shown in Fig. 2.
HPLC/DAD chromatograms of standard spiked urine, of
blank urine, and of a urine sample from the dosed volunteer
after acid hydrolysis are shown in Fig. 3. We investigated
whether or not the Tripamide metabolites were conjugated
by hydrolysis using b-glucuronidase, b-glucuronidase/
Figure 1. Structures of Tripamide and ISTD (ethyl theo-
phylline). Figure 2. HPLC/DAD chromatogram and spectrum of Tripa-
mide spiked in human urine.
Figure 3. Chromatograms of hydrolyzed Tripamide-spiked urine, blank
urine and dosed urine by HPLC/DAD.
Detection of Tripamide in human urine 303
Copyright # 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003; 17: 301–306
arylsulfatase and 6 M HCl. As shown in Fig. 4, we could not
find any metabolites of Tripamide by hydrolysis with b-glu-
curonidase or b-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase. Only by using
HCl hydrolysis could we find the suspected metabolites M1
and M2, for which UV spectra are shown in Fig. 5. We could
not detect the parent compound Tripamide in any dosed
urine after acid hydrolysis.
Characterization of Tripamide and its metabolitesby HPLC/ESI-MS/MSWe tried to identify Tripamide using HPLC/ESI-MS/MS.
[MþH]þ ions were mainly produced in ESI-positive mode,
but [MþNa]þ and/or [MþK]þ ions were also produced by
impurities in the solvent. Figure 6 shows the total ion chroma-
togram, mass spectrum, and the MS/MS spectrum of the
[MþH]þ ion of Tripamide obtained by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS.
The spectrum of the standard includes m/z 370 ([MþH]þ) and
408 ([MþK]þ), as shown in Fig. 6(b). Figure 6(c) shows the MS/
MS spectrum of m/z 370 from Tripamide as the precursor ion,
and major fragment ions at m/z 289, 262 and 250 were detected
in addition to many others. The peak atm/z 289 is due to loss of
81 Da from the precursor ion, almost certainly SO2þNH3. The
peak at m/z 262 corresponds to an additional loss of 27 Da,
almost certainly HCN or HNC. Figure 7 shows total ion chro-
matograms for spiked urine, blank urine, and dosed (and
hydrolyzed) urine obtained by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS.
We detected two peaks in dosed (and hydrolysed) urine by
acid hydrolysis. We characterized metabolites M1 and M2 in
dosed urine by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS. Figures 8 and 9 show the
total ion chromatograms, mass spectra and MS/MS spectra
for M1 and M2. In Fig. 8(b), the molecular mass of M1 is
indicated to be 384 Da ([MþH]þ ion at m/z 385). The increase
of 15 Da probably corresponds to the replacement of the -NH2
group by OH, another hydroxylation (O-insertion), and
Figure 4. HPLC chromatograms of Tripamide-dosed urine by hydrolysis
with b-glucuronidase, b-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase and 6 M HCl.
Figure 5. UV spectra of M1 and M2 from dosed urine by
HPLC/DAD.
304 Y. Kim et al.
Copyright # 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003; 17: 301–306
Figure 6. Total ion chromatogram and MS and MS/MS
spectra of a Tripamide standard.
Figure 7. Total ion chromatograms of a Tripamide-spiked
urine, blank urine and dosed urine by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS.
Figure 8. Total ion chromatogram and MS and MS/MS
spectra of M1 in dosed urine by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS.
Figure 9. Total ion chromatogram and MS and MS/MS
spectra of M2 in dosed urine by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS.
Detection of Tripamide in human urine 305
Copyright # 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003; 17: 301–306
dehydrogenation. So even though we could not determine
where the additional hydroxyl group was attached, we could
suppose M1 involves two hydroxyl groups. In the MS/MS
spectrum in Fig. 8(c), we could detect m/z 367 ([MH–H2O]þ),
m/z 349 ([MH–HCl]þ) andm/z 323 (probably loss of C2H2 from
m/z 349 as no 37Cl peak is evident). In the spectrum in Fig. 9(b),
m/z 385 for M2 was the major ion, as in Fig. 8(b). The MS/MS
spectrum of M2 in Fig. 9(c) is very close to that in Fig. 8(c). Their
structures of M1 and M2 are only slightly different, probably
with respect to OH substitution.
CONCLUSIONS
We have evaluated a screening method and a confirmation
method for Tripamide in human urine. From the results of
acid hydrolysis, Tripamide was shown to be completely con-
jugated in the body after dosing. We detected two suspected
metabolites of Tripamide by HPLC/DAD and then charac-
terized them using HPLC/ESI-MS/MS. We think these pro-
ducts were probably hydroxylated with loss of the -NH2
group and dehydrogenation. It is not certain whether or not
these are the real metabolites of Tripamide; however, we did
determine that they definitely exist in Tripamide-dosed
urine. Even though these observations need much more
study, we can apply them to confirm Tripamide in human
urine, and these results will assist doping control.
REFERENCES
1. Bridges JW, Chasseaud LF. Progress in DrugMetabolism, vol.7. John Wiley: New York, 1983; 58–171.
2. Weiner IM. In Goodman and Gilman’s Pharmacological Basis ofTherapeutics, Gilman A, Rall TW, Nies AS, Taylor P (eds).Pergamon: New York, 1990. 708.
3. Dirks JH, Sutton RAL (eds). Diuretics, Physiology, Pharma-cology and Clinical Use. W.B. Saunders: Philadelphia, PA,1986.
4. Ventura R, Segura J. J. Chromatogr. B 1996; 687: 127.5. International Olympic Committee, Medical Commission,
International Olympic Charter Against Doping in Sport, IOC:Lausanne, 1990.
6. Kawasaki K, Fukiyama K. Xenobiotica 1981; 11: 197.7. Schanzer W. The Problem of Diuretics in Doping Control.
Institut fur Biochemie der Deutschen Sporthochschule:Koln 1988. 1, private communication.
8. Brater DC, Anderson S. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1983; 34:79.
9. Hadzija BW, Mattocks AM. J. Chromatogr. 1982; 229: 425.10. Fleuren HLJM, Van Rossum JM. J. Chromatogr. 1978; 152: 41.11. Vandenheuvel WJA, Gruber VF, Walker RW, Wolf WJ.
J. Pharm. Sci. 1975; 64: 1309.12. Swart KJ, Botha H. J. Chromatogr. 1987; 413: 315.13. Hessey GA II, Constanzer ML, Bayne WF. J. Chromatogr.
1986; 380: 450.14. Sherry JH, O’Donnell JP, Colby HD. J. Chromatogr. 1986; 374:
183.15. Snedden W, Sharma JN, Fernandez PG. Ther. Drug Monit.
1982; 4: 381.16. Rapaka RS, Roth J, Viswanathan C, Goehl TJ, Prasad VK,
Cabana BE. J. Chromatogr. 1982; 227: 463.17. McCue BA, Cason MM, Curtis MA, Faulkner RD, Dahlin
DC. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2002; 28: 199.
306 Y. Kim et al.
Copyright # 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003; 17: 301–306