desktop virtualisation – fact or fiction?
DESCRIPTION
The very term “Desktop Virtualisation” has become a source of controversy, with multiple technologies all claiming to be the breakthrough solution that will change the way we manage and deploy our desktops. This session compares the multitude of approaches, their costs, the myths, the FUD and what it all means.TRANSCRIPT
© 2010 Quest Software, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Desktop Virtualization – Fact or Fiction?
Jon RollsVice President of Product Management, Desktop Virtualization
Group
• Desktop Virtualization – Why?• Desktop Virtualization Types• Display Protocols• So What Should I Do?• Quest vWorkspace – Short Introduction• Case Studies• Q&A
Agenda
• Server virtualization worked out great, why not desktops?– Because VMware invented it, right?– Hardware consolidation– Ease of management– Fault tolerance
• Because desktop management is hard– Windows is cheap because it's an open platform = cheap
hardware, but millions of device drivers = Low CapEx, high OpEx
• Security and Offshoring– Data cannot leave my network, but the presentation of that
data can
• Greater client device choice, including thin clients• Remote Access
Desktop Virtualization – Why?
• Hosted "partial virtualization“• Hosted full desktop virtualization• Client-side/distributed partial virtualization• Client-side/distributed full desktop virtualization• Also worth mentioning: Application Virtualization
Desktop Virtualization Types (1)
• Hosted "partial virtualization“• Terminal Server/Session Host
– Back to the future! This is where it all began– “Remote presentation”, “Windows mainframe” …– “Slice” of a Windows server, remote presentation, thin
client– Sometimes treated as an application virtualization tool, but
can provide a full desktop too (see next slides)– Lack of personalization: Profile can be personalized just
fine, but no user-installed apps. Do you want them anyway?
• Parallels Virtuozzo– Shared Windows Server, but with greater session isolation
than Session Host– Popular with MSPs for virtualizing Linux workloads – gaining
some early traction for virtualizing Windows too
Desktop Virtualization Types (2)
6
Operating System One
7
Operating System Two
Operating System QuizWindows Server 2008 R2 Remote Desktop (RDSH)
Windows 7 Desktop orVirtual Desktop (VDI)
Windows RDSH has > 5x the scalability over VDI
Operating System
One
Operating System
Two
• Hosted full desktop virtualization• Windows XP or 7 images on a server hypervisor
(ESX/ESXi/Hyper-V/Xen/KVM)• Rapid, automated provisioning of virtual desktops in
datacenter• Remote access = wide choice of access devices• 4x cost compared to Terminal Server/Session Host!• Massive forecasts from Gartner, Goldman Sachs et al• Don’t assume you have to do it the same way as
server virtualization– Local storage vs. network storage– Personal vs. Pooled Desktops– Do you need VMotion/Live Migration?
Desktop Virtualization Types (3)
Annual per user costs Physical Desktop VDI (HVD) Terminal Server
Hardware costs $340 $300 $110
Software costs $100 $200 $170
IT Operations $600 $400 $260
Total $1040 $900 $540
Desktop Virtualization Types Compared
• Select the appropriate technology for each class of user:
Knowledge Workers
VDI
Power Users
Physical PCs
• Fast and personal
• Provisioned on-demand
• Fully isolated and secure
• Standard desktop OS
Task Workers
Terminal Server
• Shared OS and Apps
• Server OS
• High user density
• Low licensing costs
• Fast and powerful
• Unlimited graphics experience
• Demanding users/applications
• Laptops for travelers
• Client-side/distributed partial virtualization– Redirects local OS to provide central management and
control– No hypervisor– Performance should be roughly same as physical desktop
• Vendors include: Wanova, AppSense, Ringcube• Only solves part of problem of desktop
management?– OS deployment– Badly behaved apps– Patches and updates– Security
Desktop Virtualization Types (4)
• Client-side/distributed full desktop virtualization
• Vendors include: MokaFive, Virtual Computer, XenClient, Virtual PC, Windows 7 “XP mode”, MED-V
• Well-suited to “offline” or intermittently-connected users
• Some solutions that sync the entire disk image with a hosted VM in the datacenter = big $$$
• Other solutions rely on apps to sync user data and leave the VM on the laptop
• Type 1 vs Type 2 – a religious debate! Table on next slide:
Desktop Virtualization Types (5)
Type 1 Type 2
Performance
Hardware Compatibility
Ease of Installation
Security
Type 1 vs Type 2 Client Hypervisors
• For hosted virtualization types, the user experience is determined by the display protocol
• 1) Intelligent client protocols– Microsoft RDP, Quest EOP (for RDP), Citrix ICA/HDX– Uses client resources to draw graphics and play multimedia– Better server scalability– Works on WAN/VPN/Internet– Multimedia apps need to be supported individually
• 2) Bitmap remoting– Teradici PCoIP, Microsoft RemoteFX, Red Hat SPICE?, HP
RGS?– Bitmap remoting allows for simpler, cheaper clients but
requires more server resources and network bandwidth– Automatically supports all apps
Display Protocols
• Possibilities:– Full-screen Flash with EOP Multimedia Acceleration over
WAN if connectivity allows– Effect of EOP GA on animation– Effect of EOP Xtream on latent connections
Short Demo
• There is no silver bullet. Even organizations who say they are going 100% VDI have other solutions for laptop users, power users, Macs, executives, etc...
• Recommendation: Break users into classes and assign the most appropriate tech. VDI is *expensive* and so use lower cost alternatives wherever possible to lower the average cost
• Don’t P2V existing desktops. You need a fresh start! For VDI to be affordable you need to restrict users, and get rid of wasted storage
• Let’s look at some case studies
So What Do I Do?
Broker
•VDI: Multiple Options
•Terminal Server/RDSH
•Blade PCs
User Experience
•Optimized Performance
•Range of Access Devices
•Universal USB and Print
Management
•Automation
•Flexibility
•Security
Quest vWorkspace – Short Introduction
The vWorkspace Difference5 Levels of Independence
Why Quest?Lowest Cost Throughout the Virtual Desktop Continuum
Annual per user costs Task Workers Full Desktop Users Mobile Desktop Users
Quest vWorkspace + Alliance Partners
Extended Terminal Server/Session Host
$546
VDI with hypervisor choice$879
Fully distributed virt with MokaFive/Virtual Comp’r
$860
VMware View VDI on vSphere
$884
VDI on vSphere
$884
VDI on vSphere with local mode
$1281
Citrix XenDesktop Extended Terminal Server/Session Host
$731
VDI on XenServer
$1004
VDI synchronized with XenClient
$1391
Hosted, Connected Distributed, Offline
• Kingston University • Lancashire Constabulary • York University • University of Buckingham• Colchester Borough Council
via Serco Group Ltd
Quest vWorkspace UK References
For More Information
ROI White Paper
Desktop Virtualization: Best Bet for a Dwindling IT Budget? Where are the Actual Savings?
www.quest.com/documents/landing.aspx?id=10685&technology=&prod=389&prodfamily=&loc =
vWorkspace Demos
www.quest.com/vworkspace/demo.aspx
Case Studies
www.quest.com/documents/list.aspx?contenttypeid=13&technology=&prod=389&prodfamily=&loc=%20
vWorkspace Evaluation Software
www.quest.com/vworkspace/download.aspx
vWorkspace Web pages & General Information
www.quest.com/vworkspace/
vWorkspace Webcasts and Events
www.quest.com/vworkspace/events-webcasts.aspx
vWorkspace Videos – How to Solve Common Problems
www.quest.com/vworkspace/download.aspx
ESG White Paper
Desktop Virtualization: Concept Becomes Reality with Quest
www.quest.com/documents/landing.aspx?id=11962&technology=&prod=&prodfamily=&loc =