dependence models and copulas in coherent systems 2017. 3. 9. · representations comparison results...

140
Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro 1 Universidad de Murcia, Spain. E-mail: [email protected], 10th International Conference on Computational and Financial Econometrics (CFE 2016). Sevilla, 9-11 December 2016. 1 Supported by Ministerio de Econom´ ıa y Competitividad under Grant MTM2012-34023-FEDER. CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 18-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Dependence Models and Copulas in CoherentSystems

Jorge Navarro1

Universidad de Murcia, Spain.E-mail: [email protected],

10th International Conference on Computational and FinancialEconometrics (CFE 2016).

Sevilla, 9-11 December 2016.

1Supported by Ministerio de Economıa y Competitividad under GrantMTM2012-34023-FEDER.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 2: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Notation

X1, . . . ,Xn component lifetimes with RF

F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t).

T = φ(X1, . . . ,Xn) system (network) lifetime with RF

FT (t) = Pr(T > t).

We assume F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t) > 0 and FT (t) > 0 for t ≥ 0.

Component residual lifetimes Xi ,t = (Xi − t|Xi > t) with RF:

F i ,t(x) = Pr(Xi ,t > x) = Pr(Xi − t > x |Xi > t) =F i (t + x)

F i (t).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 3: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Notation

X1, . . . ,Xn component lifetimes with RF

F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t).

T = φ(X1, . . . ,Xn) system (network) lifetime with RF

FT (t) = Pr(T > t).

We assume F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t) > 0 and FT (t) > 0 for t ≥ 0.

Component residual lifetimes Xi ,t = (Xi − t|Xi > t) with RF:

F i ,t(x) = Pr(Xi ,t > x) = Pr(Xi − t > x |Xi > t) =F i (t + x)

F i (t).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 4: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Notation

X1, . . . ,Xn component lifetimes with RF

F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t).

T = φ(X1, . . . ,Xn) system (network) lifetime with RF

FT (t) = Pr(T > t).

We assume F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t) > 0 and FT (t) > 0 for t ≥ 0.

Component residual lifetimes Xi ,t = (Xi − t|Xi > t) with RF:

F i ,t(x) = Pr(Xi ,t > x) = Pr(Xi − t > x |Xi > t) =F i (t + x)

F i (t).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 5: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Notation

X1, . . . ,Xn component lifetimes with RF

F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t).

T = φ(X1, . . . ,Xn) system (network) lifetime with RF

FT (t) = Pr(T > t).

We assume F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t) > 0 and FT (t) > 0 for t ≥ 0.

Component residual lifetimes Xi ,t = (Xi − t|Xi > t) with RF:

F i ,t(x) = Pr(Xi ,t > x) = Pr(Xi − t > x |Xi > t) =F i (t + x)

F i (t).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 6: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

System residual lifetimes

We have two main options to define the system residuallifetime at time t > 0:

The usual residual lifetime Tt = (T − t|T > t) with RF

F t(x) = Pr(T − t > x |T > t) =FT (t + x)

FT (t).

The residual lifetime at the system levelT ∗

t = (T − t|X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t) with RF

F∗t (x) = Pr(T ∗

t > x) =Pr(T > t + x ,X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

when Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t) > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 7: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

System residual lifetimes

We have two main options to define the system residuallifetime at time t > 0:

The usual residual lifetime Tt = (T − t|T > t) with RF

F t(x) = Pr(T − t > x |T > t) =FT (t + x)

FT (t).

The residual lifetime at the system levelT ∗

t = (T − t|X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t) with RF

F∗t (x) = Pr(T ∗

t > x) =Pr(T > t + x ,X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

when Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t) > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 8: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

System residual lifetimes

We have two main options to define the system residuallifetime at time t > 0:

The usual residual lifetime Tt = (T − t|T > t) with RF

F t(x) = Pr(T − t > x |T > t) =FT (t + x)

FT (t).

The residual lifetime at the system levelT ∗

t = (T − t|X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t) with RF

F∗t (x) = Pr(T ∗

t > x) =Pr(T > t + x ,X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

when Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t) > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 9: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

System residual lifetimes

Which one is the best system?

Intuitively, it seems that T ∗t should be always better than Tt .

It should be better to know that all the components areworking at time t!

For T = min(X1, . . . ,Xn), Tt =ST T ∗t (where =ST denotes

equality in distribution) for all t > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 10: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

System residual lifetimes

Which one is the best system?

Intuitively, it seems that T ∗t should be always better than Tt .

It should be better to know that all the components areworking at time t!

For T = min(X1, . . . ,Xn), Tt =ST T ∗t (where =ST denotes

equality in distribution) for all t > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 11: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

System residual lifetimes

Which one is the best system?

Intuitively, it seems that T ∗t should be always better than Tt .

It should be better to know that all the components areworking at time t!

For T = min(X1, . . . ,Xn), Tt =ST T ∗t (where =ST denotes

equality in distribution) for all t > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 12: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

System residual lifetimes

Which one is the best system?

Intuitively, it seems that T ∗t should be always better than Tt .

It should be better to know that all the components areworking at time t!

For T = min(X1, . . . ,Xn), Tt =ST T ∗t (where =ST denotes

equality in distribution) for all t > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 13: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

System residual lifetimes

If X1, . . . ,Xn are independent, then

Tt = (T − t|T > t) ≤ST T ∗t = (T − t|X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t);

(1)see Pellerey and Petakos (IEEE Tr Rel, 2002) and Li and Lu(PEIS, 2003).

Conditions on (X1, . . . ,Xn) to have (1) were given in Li,Pellerey and You (2013).

They also proved that (1) is not necessarily true in thedependent (discrete) case.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 14: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

System residual lifetimes

If X1, . . . ,Xn are independent, then

Tt = (T − t|T > t) ≤ST T ∗t = (T − t|X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t);

(1)see Pellerey and Petakos (IEEE Tr Rel, 2002) and Li and Lu(PEIS, 2003).

Conditions on (X1, . . . ,Xn) to have (1) were given in Li,Pellerey and You (2013).

They also proved that (1) is not necessarily true in thedependent (discrete) case.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 15: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

System residual lifetimes

If X1, . . . ,Xn are independent, then

Tt = (T − t|T > t) ≤ST T ∗t = (T − t|X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t);

(1)see Pellerey and Petakos (IEEE Tr Rel, 2002) and Li and Lu(PEIS, 2003).

Conditions on (X1, . . . ,Xn) to have (1) were given in Li,Pellerey and You (2013).

They also proved that (1) is not necessarily true in thedependent (discrete) case.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 16: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Outline

1. Representations as distorted distributions for these systemsare obtained.

2. These representations are used to compare these systemsunder different orderings.

Conditions to get (1) for some orders are given when thedependence (copula) structure is known.

3. Some illustrative examples are given.

They show that (1) holds (or does not hold) for some copulas,system structures and stochastic orders.

Surprisingly, in some cases, the ordering in (1) does not holdor it can be reversed!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 17: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Outline

1. Representations as distorted distributions for these systemsare obtained.

2. These representations are used to compare these systemsunder different orderings.

Conditions to get (1) for some orders are given when thedependence (copula) structure is known.

3. Some illustrative examples are given.

They show that (1) holds (or does not hold) for some copulas,system structures and stochastic orders.

Surprisingly, in some cases, the ordering in (1) does not holdor it can be reversed!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 18: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Outline

1. Representations as distorted distributions for these systemsare obtained.

2. These representations are used to compare these systemsunder different orderings.

Conditions to get (1) for some orders are given when thedependence (copula) structure is known.

3. Some illustrative examples are given.

They show that (1) holds (or does not hold) for some copulas,system structures and stochastic orders.

Surprisingly, in some cases, the ordering in (1) does not holdor it can be reversed!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 19: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Outline

1. Representations as distorted distributions for these systemsare obtained.

2. These representations are used to compare these systemsunder different orderings.

Conditions to get (1) for some orders are given when thedependence (copula) structure is known.

3. Some illustrative examples are given.

They show that (1) holds (or does not hold) for some copulas,system structures and stochastic orders.

Surprisingly, in some cases, the ordering in (1) does not holdor it can be reversed!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 20: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Outline

1. Representations as distorted distributions for these systemsare obtained.

2. These representations are used to compare these systemsunder different orderings.

Conditions to get (1) for some orders are given when thedependence (copula) structure is known.

3. Some illustrative examples are given.

They show that (1) holds (or does not hold) for some copulas,system structures and stochastic orders.

Surprisingly, in some cases, the ordering in (1) does not holdor it can be reversed!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 21: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Outline

1. Representations as distorted distributions for these systemsare obtained.

2. These representations are used to compare these systemsunder different orderings.

Conditions to get (1) for some orders are given when thedependence (copula) structure is known.

3. Some illustrative examples are given.

They show that (1) holds (or does not hold) for some copulas,system structures and stochastic orders.

Surprisingly, in some cases, the ordering in (1) does not holdor it can be reversed!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 22: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Generalized distorted distribution

The generalized distorted distribution (GDD) associated ton DF F1, . . . ,Fn and to an increasing continuous multivariatedistortion (aggregation) function Q : [0, 1]n → [0, 1] suchthat Q(0, . . . , 0) = 0 and Q(1, . . . , 1) = 1, is

FQ(t) = Q(F1(t), . . . ,Fn(t)). (2)

For the RF we have

FQ(t) = Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)), (3)

where F i = 1− Fi , FQ = 1− FQ andQ(u1, . . . , un) = 1−Q(1− u1, . . . , 1− un) is the multivariatedual distortion function; see Navarro et al. (MCAP 2015).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 23: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Generalized distorted distribution

The generalized distorted distribution (GDD) associated ton DF F1, . . . ,Fn and to an increasing continuous multivariatedistortion (aggregation) function Q : [0, 1]n → [0, 1] suchthat Q(0, . . . , 0) = 0 and Q(1, . . . , 1) = 1, is

FQ(t) = Q(F1(t), . . . ,Fn(t)). (2)

For the RF we have

FQ(t) = Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)), (3)

where F i = 1− Fi , FQ = 1− FQ andQ(u1, . . . , un) = 1−Q(1− u1, . . . , 1− un) is the multivariatedual distortion function; see Navarro et al. (MCAP 2015).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 24: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Distorted distribution

The distorted distribution (DD) associated to n DF F andto an increasing continuous distortion functionq : [0, 1] → [0, 1] such that q(0) = 0 and q(1) = 1, is

Fq(t) = q(F (t)). (4)

They appear in Risk Theory.

For the RF we have

F q(t) = q(F (t)), (5)

where F = 1− F , F q = 1− Fq and q(u) = 1− q(1− u) iscalled the dual distortion function.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 25: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Distorted distribution

The distorted distribution (DD) associated to n DF F andto an increasing continuous distortion functionq : [0, 1] → [0, 1] such that q(0) = 0 and q(1) = 1, is

Fq(t) = q(F (t)). (4)

They appear in Risk Theory.

For the RF we have

F q(t) = q(F (t)), (5)

where F = 1− F , F q = 1− Fq and q(u) = 1− q(1− u) iscalled the dual distortion function.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 26: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Distorted distribution

The distorted distribution (DD) associated to n DF F andto an increasing continuous distortion functionq : [0, 1] → [0, 1] such that q(0) = 0 and q(1) = 1, is

Fq(t) = q(F (t)). (4)

They appear in Risk Theory.

For the RF we have

F q(t) = q(F (t)), (5)

where F = 1− F , F q = 1− Fq and q(u) = 1− q(1− u) iscalled the dual distortion function.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 27: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent systems-GENERAL case

A path set of T is a set P ⊆ {1, . . . , n} such that if all thecomponents in P work, then the system works.

A minimal path set of T is a path set which does notcontain other path sets.

If P1, . . . ,Pm are the minimal path sets of T , thenT = maxj=1,...,m XPj

, where XP = mini∈P Xi and

FT (t) = Pr

(max

j=1,...,mXPj

> t

)= Pr

(∪m

j=1{XPj> t}

)=

m∑i=1

FPi(t)−

∑i 6=j

FPi∪Pj(t) + · · · ± FP1∪···∪Pm(t)

where FP(t) = Pr(XP > t).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 28: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent systems-GENERAL case

A path set of T is a set P ⊆ {1, . . . , n} such that if all thecomponents in P work, then the system works.

A minimal path set of T is a path set which does notcontain other path sets.

If P1, . . . ,Pm are the minimal path sets of T , thenT = maxj=1,...,m XPj

, where XP = mini∈P Xi and

FT (t) = Pr

(max

j=1,...,mXPj

> t

)= Pr

(∪m

j=1{XPj> t}

)=

m∑i=1

FPi(t)−

∑i 6=j

FPi∪Pj(t) + · · · ± FP1∪···∪Pm(t)

where FP(t) = Pr(XP > t).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 29: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent systems-GENERAL case

A path set of T is a set P ⊆ {1, . . . , n} such that if all thecomponents in P work, then the system works.

A minimal path set of T is a path set which does notcontain other path sets.

If P1, . . . ,Pm are the minimal path sets of T , thenT = maxj=1,...,m XPj

, where XP = mini∈P Xi and

FT (t) = Pr

(max

j=1,...,mXPj

> t

)= Pr

(∪m

j=1{XPj> t}

)=

m∑i=1

FPi(t)−

∑i 6=j

FPi∪Pj(t) + · · · ± FP1∪···∪Pm(t)

where FP(t) = Pr(XP > t).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 30: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representation

The copula representation for the RF of (X1, . . . ,Xn) is

F(x1, . . . , xn) = Pr(X1 > x1, . . . ,Xn > xn) = K (F 1(x1), . . . ,F n(xn)),

where F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t) and K is the survival copula. Hence

F 1:k(t) = Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xk > t) = K (F 1(t), . . . ,F r (t), 1, . . . , 1).

Analogously, for XP , we have

FP(t) = KP(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)),

where KP(u1, . . . , un) = K (uP1 , . . . , u

Pn ) and uP

i = ui if i ∈ Por uP

i = 1 if i /∈ P.

Hence the system reliability can be written as

FT (t) = Qφ,K (F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 31: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representation

The copula representation for the RF of (X1, . . . ,Xn) is

F(x1, . . . , xn) = Pr(X1 > x1, . . . ,Xn > xn) = K (F 1(x1), . . . ,F n(xn)),

where F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t) and K is the survival copula. Hence

F 1:k(t) = Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xk > t) = K (F 1(t), . . . ,F r (t), 1, . . . , 1).

Analogously, for XP , we have

FP(t) = KP(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)),

where KP(u1, . . . , un) = K (uP1 , . . . , u

Pn ) and uP

i = ui if i ∈ Por uP

i = 1 if i /∈ P.

Hence the system reliability can be written as

FT (t) = Qφ,K (F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 32: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representation

The copula representation for the RF of (X1, . . . ,Xn) is

F(x1, . . . , xn) = Pr(X1 > x1, . . . ,Xn > xn) = K (F 1(x1), . . . ,F n(xn)),

where F i (t) = Pr(Xi > t) and K is the survival copula. Hence

F 1:k(t) = Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xk > t) = K (F 1(t), . . . ,F r (t), 1, . . . , 1).

Analogously, for XP , we have

FP(t) = KP(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)),

where KP(u1, . . . , un) = K (uP1 , . . . , u

Pn ) and uP

i = ui if i ∈ Por uP

i = 1 if i /∈ P.

Hence the system reliability can be written as

FT (t) = Qφ,K (F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 33: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representations

Particular cases:

If the components are ID, then FT (t) = qφ,K (F (t)) where

qφ,K (u) = Qφ,K (u, . . . , u).

If the components are IND, then Qφ,K is a multinomial.

If the components are IID, then qφ,K (u) =∑n

i=1 aiui , where

(a1, . . . , an) is the minimal signature.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 34: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representations

Particular cases:

If the components are ID, then FT (t) = qφ,K (F (t)) where

qφ,K (u) = Qφ,K (u, . . . , u).

If the components are IND, then Qφ,K is a multinomial.

If the components are IID, then qφ,K (u) =∑n

i=1 aiui , where

(a1, . . . , an) is the minimal signature.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 35: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representations

Particular cases:

If the components are ID, then FT (t) = qφ,K (F (t)) where

qφ,K (u) = Qφ,K (u, . . . , u).

If the components are IND, then Qφ,K is a multinomial.

If the components are IID, then qφ,K (u) =∑n

i=1 aiui , where

(a1, . . . , an) is the minimal signature.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 36: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representations

Particular cases:

If the components are ID, then FT (t) = qφ,K (F (t)) where

qφ,K (u) = Qφ,K (u, . . . , u).

If the components are IND, then Qφ,K is a multinomial.

If the components are IID, then qφ,K (u) =∑n

i=1 aiui , where

(a1, . . . , an) is the minimal signature.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 37: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Representations for the system residual lifetimes

The RF of Tt = (T − t|T > t) is

F t(x) =FT (t + x)

FT (t)=

Q(F 1(t + x), . . . ,F n(t + x))

Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

Then

F t(x) =Q(F 1(t)F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n(t)F n,t(x))

Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)),

where F i ,t(x) = F i (t + x)/F i (t).Therefore

F t(x) = Qt(F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n,t(x)),

where

Qt(u1, . . . , un) =Q(F 1(t)u1, . . . ,F n(t)un)

Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 38: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Representations for the system residual lifetimes

The RF of Tt = (T − t|T > t) is

F t(x) =FT (t + x)

FT (t)=

Q(F 1(t + x), . . . ,F n(t + x))

Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

Then

F t(x) =Q(F 1(t)F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n(t)F n,t(x))

Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)),

where F i ,t(x) = F i (t + x)/F i (t).Therefore

F t(x) = Qt(F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n,t(x)),

where

Qt(u1, . . . , un) =Q(F 1(t)u1, . . . ,F n(t)un)

Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 39: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Representations for the system residual lifetimes

The RF of Tt = (T − t|T > t) is

F t(x) =FT (t + x)

FT (t)=

Q(F 1(t + x), . . . ,F n(t + x))

Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

Then

F t(x) =Q(F 1(t)F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n(t)F n,t(x))

Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)),

where F i ,t(x) = F i (t + x)/F i (t).Therefore

F t(x) = Qt(F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n,t(x)),

where

Qt(u1, . . . , un) =Q(F 1(t)u1, . . . ,F n(t)un)

Q(F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 40: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Representations for the system residual lifetimes

The RF of T ∗t = (T − t|X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t) is

F∗t (x) =

Pr(T > t + x ,X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t).

As T = maxj=1,...,m XPjfor the minimal path sets P1, . . . ,Pm,

then

F∗t (x) =

Pr(maxj=1,...,m XPj> t + x ,X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

K (F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

Therefore

F∗t (x) = Q

∗t (F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n,t(x)),

where F i ,t(x) = F i (t + x)/F i (t).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 41: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Representations for the system residual lifetimes

The RF of T ∗t = (T − t|X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t) is

F∗t (x) =

Pr(T > t + x ,X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t).

As T = maxj=1,...,m XPjfor the minimal path sets P1, . . . ,Pm,

then

F∗t (x) =

Pr(maxj=1,...,m XPj> t + x ,X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

K (F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

Therefore

F∗t (x) = Q

∗t (F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n,t(x)),

where F i ,t(x) = F i (t + x)/F i (t).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 42: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Representations for the system residual lifetimes

The RF of T ∗t = (T − t|X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t) is

F∗t (x) =

Pr(T > t + x ,X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

Pr(X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t).

As T = maxj=1,...,m XPjfor the minimal path sets P1, . . . ,Pm,

then

F∗t (x) =

Pr(maxj=1,...,m XPj> t + x ,X1 > t, . . . ,Xn > t)

K (F 1(t), . . . ,F n(t)).

Therefore

F∗t (x) = Q

∗t (F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n,t(x)),

where F i ,t(x) = F i (t + x)/F i (t).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 43: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two components

T = max(X1,X2).

Minimal path sets P1 = {1} and P2 = {2}.System reliability function:

FT (t) = Pr(max(X1,X2) > t) = F 1(t)+F 2(t)−Pr(X1 > t,X2 > t).

Then:FT (t) = Q(F 1(t),F 2(t)),

whereQ(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − K (u1, u2).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 44: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two components

T = max(X1,X2).

Minimal path sets P1 = {1} and P2 = {2}.System reliability function:

FT (t) = Pr(max(X1,X2) > t) = F 1(t)+F 2(t)−Pr(X1 > t,X2 > t).

Then:FT (t) = Q(F 1(t),F 2(t)),

whereQ(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − K (u1, u2).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 45: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two components

T = max(X1,X2).

Minimal path sets P1 = {1} and P2 = {2}.System reliability function:

FT (t) = Pr(max(X1,X2) > t) = F 1(t)+F 2(t)−Pr(X1 > t,X2 > t).

Then:FT (t) = Q(F 1(t),F 2(t)),

whereQ(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − K (u1, u2).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 46: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two components

T = max(X1,X2).

Minimal path sets P1 = {1} and P2 = {2}.System reliability function:

FT (t) = Pr(max(X1,X2) > t) = F 1(t)+F 2(t)−Pr(X1 > t,X2 > t).

Then:FT (t) = Q(F 1(t),F 2(t)),

whereQ(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − K (u1, u2).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 47: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representation

Particular cases:

If the components are ID, then FT (t) = q(F (t)) where

q(u) = Q(u, u) = 2u − K (u, u).

If the components are IND, then

Q(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2.

If the components are IID, then

q(u) = 2u − u2,

where a = (2,−1) is the minimal signature.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 48: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representation

Particular cases:

If the components are ID, then FT (t) = q(F (t)) where

q(u) = Q(u, u) = 2u − K (u, u).

If the components are IND, then

Q(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2.

If the components are IID, then

q(u) = 2u − u2,

where a = (2,−1) is the minimal signature.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 49: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representation

Particular cases:

If the components are ID, then FT (t) = q(F (t)) where

q(u) = Q(u, u) = 2u − K (u, u).

If the components are IND, then

Q(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2.

If the components are IID, then

q(u) = 2u − u2,

where a = (2,−1) is the minimal signature.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 50: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Coherent system representation

Particular cases:

If the components are ID, then FT (t) = q(F (t)) where

q(u) = Q(u, u) = 2u − K (u, u).

If the components are IND, then

Q(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2.

If the components are IID, then

q(u) = 2u − u2,

where a = (2,−1) is the minimal signature.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 51: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two components

The RF of Tt = (T − t|T > t) is

F t(x) = Qt(F 1,t(x),F 2,t(x)),

where

Qt(u1, u2) =Q(F 1(t)u1,F 2(t)u2)

Q(F 1(t),F 2(t)).

Then

Qt(u1, u2) =F 1(t)u1 + F 2(t)u2 − K (F 1(t)u1,F 2(t)u2)

F 1(t) + F 2(t)− K (F 1(t),F 2(t)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 52: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two components

The RF of Tt = (T − t|T > t) is

F t(x) = Qt(F 1,t(x),F 2,t(x)),

where

Qt(u1, u2) =Q(F 1(t)u1,F 2(t)u2)

Q(F 1(t),F 2(t)).

Then

Qt(u1, u2) =F 1(t)u1 + F 2(t)u2 − K (F 1(t)u1,F 2(t)u2)

F 1(t) + F 2(t)− K (F 1(t),F 2(t)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 53: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two components

The RF of T ∗t = (T − t|X1 > t,X2 > t) is

F∗t (x) =

Pr(max(X1,X2) > t + x ,X1 > t,X2 > t)

Pr(X1 > t,X2 > t).

Hence

F∗t (x) =

K (F 1(t + x), c2) + K (c1,F 2(t + x))− K (F 1(t + x),F 2(t + x))

K (c1, c2),

where c1 = F 1(t) and c2 = F 2(t).

Then F t(x) = Q∗t (F 1,t(x),F 2,t(x)), where

Q∗t (u1, u2) =

K (c1u1, c2) + K (c1, c2u2)− K (c1u1, c2u2)

K (c1, c2).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 54: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two components

The RF of T ∗t = (T − t|X1 > t,X2 > t) is

F∗t (x) =

Pr(max(X1,X2) > t + x ,X1 > t,X2 > t)

Pr(X1 > t,X2 > t).

Hence

F∗t (x) =

K (F 1(t + x), c2) + K (c1,F 2(t + x))− K (F 1(t + x),F 2(t + x))

K (c1, c2),

where c1 = F 1(t) and c2 = F 2(t).

Then F t(x) = Q∗t (F 1,t(x),F 2,t(x)), where

Q∗t (u1, u2) =

K (c1u1, c2) + K (c1, c2u2)− K (c1u1, c2u2)

K (c1, c2).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 55: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two components

The RF of T ∗t = (T − t|X1 > t,X2 > t) is

F∗t (x) =

Pr(max(X1,X2) > t + x ,X1 > t,X2 > t)

Pr(X1 > t,X2 > t).

Hence

F∗t (x) =

K (F 1(t + x), c2) + K (c1,F 2(t + x))− K (F 1(t + x),F 2(t + x))

K (c1, c2),

where c1 = F 1(t) and c2 = F 2(t).

Then F t(x) = Q∗t (F 1,t(x),F 2,t(x)), where

Q∗t (u1, u2) =

K (c1u1, c2) + K (c1, c2u2)− K (c1u1, c2u2)

K (c1, c2).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 56: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two IND components

If X1 and X2 are IND, then K (u1, u2) = u1u2 and

Q∗t (u1, u2) =

F 1(t)u1F 2(t) + F 1(t)F 2(t)u2 − F 1(t)u1F 2(t)u2

F 1(t)F 2(t),

that is,

Q∗t (u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2 = Q(u1, u2).

This is a general property, i.e., if X1, . . . ,Xn are IND, then

Q∗t (u1, . . . , un) = Q(u1, . . . , un).

Some authors consider the system T ∗∗t with reliability function

F∗∗t (x) = Q(F 1,t(x),F 2,t(x)).

The meaning in practice is not clear for me.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 57: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two IND components

If X1 and X2 are IND, then K (u1, u2) = u1u2 and

Q∗t (u1, u2) =

F 1(t)u1F 2(t) + F 1(t)F 2(t)u2 − F 1(t)u1F 2(t)u2

F 1(t)F 2(t),

that is,

Q∗t (u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2 = Q(u1, u2).

This is a general property, i.e., if X1, . . . ,Xn are IND, then

Q∗t (u1, . . . , un) = Q(u1, . . . , un).

Some authors consider the system T ∗∗t with reliability function

F∗∗t (x) = Q(F 1,t(x),F 2,t(x)).

The meaning in practice is not clear for me.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 58: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two IND components

If X1 and X2 are IND, then K (u1, u2) = u1u2 and

Q∗t (u1, u2) =

F 1(t)u1F 2(t) + F 1(t)F 2(t)u2 − F 1(t)u1F 2(t)u2

F 1(t)F 2(t),

that is,

Q∗t (u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2 = Q(u1, u2).

This is a general property, i.e., if X1, . . . ,Xn are IND, then

Q∗t (u1, . . . , un) = Q(u1, . . . , un).

Some authors consider the system T ∗∗t with reliability function

F∗∗t (x) = Q(F 1,t(x),F 2,t(x)).

The meaning in practice is not clear for me.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 59: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Coherent systemsResidual lifetimesAn example

Parallel system with two IND components

If X1 and X2 are IND, then K (u1, u2) = u1u2 and

Q∗t (u1, u2) =

F 1(t)u1F 2(t) + F 1(t)F 2(t)u2 − F 1(t)u1F 2(t)u2

F 1(t)F 2(t),

that is,

Q∗t (u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2 = Q(u1, u2).

This is a general property, i.e., if X1, . . . ,Xn are IND, then

Q∗t (u1, . . . , un) = Q(u1, . . . , un).

Some authors consider the system T ∗∗t with reliability function

F∗∗t (x) = Q(F 1,t(x),F 2,t(x)).

The meaning in practice is not clear for me.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 60: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-DD

If q1 and q2 are two DF,

q1(F ) ≤ord q2(F ) for all F?

If q is a DF,

F ≤ord G ⇒ q(F ) ≤ord q(G )?

If Q1 and Q2 are two MDF,

Q1(F1, . . . ,Fn) ≤ord Q2(F1, . . . ,Fn)?

If Q is a MDF,

Fi ≤ord Gi , i = 1, . . . , n,⇒ Q(F1, . . . ,Fn) ≤ord Q(G1, . . . ,Gn)?

Navarro, del Aguila, Sordo and Suarez-Llorens (2013, ASMBI)and (2016, MCAP) and Navarro and Gomis (2016, ASMBI).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 61: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-DD

If q1 and q2 are two DF,

q1(F ) ≤ord q2(F ) for all F?

If q is a DF,

F ≤ord G ⇒ q(F ) ≤ord q(G )?

If Q1 and Q2 are two MDF,

Q1(F1, . . . ,Fn) ≤ord Q2(F1, . . . ,Fn)?

If Q is a MDF,

Fi ≤ord Gi , i = 1, . . . , n,⇒ Q(F1, . . . ,Fn) ≤ord Q(G1, . . . ,Gn)?

Navarro, del Aguila, Sordo and Suarez-Llorens (2013, ASMBI)and (2016, MCAP) and Navarro and Gomis (2016, ASMBI).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 62: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-DD

If q1 and q2 are two DF,

q1(F ) ≤ord q2(F ) for all F?

If q is a DF,

F ≤ord G ⇒ q(F ) ≤ord q(G )?

If Q1 and Q2 are two MDF,

Q1(F1, . . . ,Fn) ≤ord Q2(F1, . . . ,Fn)?

If Q is a MDF,

Fi ≤ord Gi , i = 1, . . . , n,⇒ Q(F1, . . . ,Fn) ≤ord Q(G1, . . . ,Gn)?

Navarro, del Aguila, Sordo and Suarez-Llorens (2013, ASMBI)and (2016, MCAP) and Navarro and Gomis (2016, ASMBI).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 63: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-DD

If q1 and q2 are two DF,

q1(F ) ≤ord q2(F ) for all F?

If q is a DF,

F ≤ord G ⇒ q(F ) ≤ord q(G )?

If Q1 and Q2 are two MDF,

Q1(F1, . . . ,Fn) ≤ord Q2(F1, . . . ,Fn)?

If Q is a MDF,

Fi ≤ord Gi , i = 1, . . . , n,⇒ Q(F1, . . . ,Fn) ≤ord Q(G1, . . . ,Gn)?

Navarro, del Aguila, Sordo and Suarez-Llorens (2013, ASMBI)and (2016, MCAP) and Navarro and Gomis (2016, ASMBI).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 64: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Main stochastic orderings

X ≤ST Y ⇔ FX (t) ≤ FY (t), stochastic order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ hX (t) ≥ hY (t), hazard rate order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ (X − t|X > t) ≤ST (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤MRL Y ⇔ E (X − t|X > t) ≤ E (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤LR Y ⇔ fY (t)/fX (t) is nondecreasing, likelihood ratioorder.

X ≤RHR Y ⇔ (t − X |X < t) ≥ST (t − Y |Y < t) for all t.

Then

X ≤LR Y ⇒ X ≤HR Y ⇒ X ≤MRL Y⇓ ⇓ ⇓

X ≤RHR Y ⇒ X ≤ST Y ⇒ E (X ) ≤ E (Y )

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 65: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Main stochastic orderings

X ≤ST Y ⇔ FX (t) ≤ FY (t), stochastic order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ hX (t) ≥ hY (t), hazard rate order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ (X − t|X > t) ≤ST (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤MRL Y ⇔ E (X − t|X > t) ≤ E (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤LR Y ⇔ fY (t)/fX (t) is nondecreasing, likelihood ratioorder.

X ≤RHR Y ⇔ (t − X |X < t) ≥ST (t − Y |Y < t) for all t.

Then

X ≤LR Y ⇒ X ≤HR Y ⇒ X ≤MRL Y⇓ ⇓ ⇓

X ≤RHR Y ⇒ X ≤ST Y ⇒ E (X ) ≤ E (Y )

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 66: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Main stochastic orderings

X ≤ST Y ⇔ FX (t) ≤ FY (t), stochastic order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ hX (t) ≥ hY (t), hazard rate order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ (X − t|X > t) ≤ST (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤MRL Y ⇔ E (X − t|X > t) ≤ E (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤LR Y ⇔ fY (t)/fX (t) is nondecreasing, likelihood ratioorder.

X ≤RHR Y ⇔ (t − X |X < t) ≥ST (t − Y |Y < t) for all t.

Then

X ≤LR Y ⇒ X ≤HR Y ⇒ X ≤MRL Y⇓ ⇓ ⇓

X ≤RHR Y ⇒ X ≤ST Y ⇒ E (X ) ≤ E (Y )

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 67: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Main stochastic orderings

X ≤ST Y ⇔ FX (t) ≤ FY (t), stochastic order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ hX (t) ≥ hY (t), hazard rate order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ (X − t|X > t) ≤ST (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤MRL Y ⇔ E (X − t|X > t) ≤ E (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤LR Y ⇔ fY (t)/fX (t) is nondecreasing, likelihood ratioorder.

X ≤RHR Y ⇔ (t − X |X < t) ≥ST (t − Y |Y < t) for all t.

Then

X ≤LR Y ⇒ X ≤HR Y ⇒ X ≤MRL Y⇓ ⇓ ⇓

X ≤RHR Y ⇒ X ≤ST Y ⇒ E (X ) ≤ E (Y )

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 68: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Main stochastic orderings

X ≤ST Y ⇔ FX (t) ≤ FY (t), stochastic order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ hX (t) ≥ hY (t), hazard rate order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ (X − t|X > t) ≤ST (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤MRL Y ⇔ E (X − t|X > t) ≤ E (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤LR Y ⇔ fY (t)/fX (t) is nondecreasing, likelihood ratioorder.

X ≤RHR Y ⇔ (t − X |X < t) ≥ST (t − Y |Y < t) for all t.

Then

X ≤LR Y ⇒ X ≤HR Y ⇒ X ≤MRL Y⇓ ⇓ ⇓

X ≤RHR Y ⇒ X ≤ST Y ⇒ E (X ) ≤ E (Y )

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 69: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Main stochastic orderings

X ≤ST Y ⇔ FX (t) ≤ FY (t), stochastic order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ hX (t) ≥ hY (t), hazard rate order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ (X − t|X > t) ≤ST (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤MRL Y ⇔ E (X − t|X > t) ≤ E (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤LR Y ⇔ fY (t)/fX (t) is nondecreasing, likelihood ratioorder.

X ≤RHR Y ⇔ (t − X |X < t) ≥ST (t − Y |Y < t) for all t.

Then

X ≤LR Y ⇒ X ≤HR Y ⇒ X ≤MRL Y⇓ ⇓ ⇓

X ≤RHR Y ⇒ X ≤ST Y ⇒ E (X ) ≤ E (Y )

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 70: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Main stochastic orderings

X ≤ST Y ⇔ FX (t) ≤ FY (t), stochastic order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ hX (t) ≥ hY (t), hazard rate order.

X ≤HR Y ⇔ (X − t|X > t) ≤ST (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤MRL Y ⇔ E (X − t|X > t) ≤ E (Y − t|Y > t) for all t.

X ≤LR Y ⇔ fY (t)/fX (t) is nondecreasing, likelihood ratioorder.

X ≤RHR Y ⇔ (t − X |X < t) ≥ST (t − Y |Y < t) for all t.

Then

X ≤LR Y ⇒ X ≤HR Y ⇒ X ≤MRL Y⇓ ⇓ ⇓

X ≤RHR Y ⇒ X ≤ST Y ⇒ E (X ) ≤ E (Y )

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 71: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-DD

If Ti has the RF qi (F (t)), i = 1, 2, then:

T1 ≤ST T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 ≥ 1 in (0, 1).

T1 ≤HR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 decreases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤RHR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 increases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤LR T2 for all F if and only if q′2/q′1 decreases.

T1 ≤MRL T2 for all F such that E (T1) ≤ E (T2) if q2/q1 isbathtub in (0, 1).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 72: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-DD

If Ti has the RF qi (F (t)), i = 1, 2, then:

T1 ≤ST T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 ≥ 1 in (0, 1).

T1 ≤HR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 decreases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤RHR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 increases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤LR T2 for all F if and only if q′2/q′1 decreases.

T1 ≤MRL T2 for all F such that E (T1) ≤ E (T2) if q2/q1 isbathtub in (0, 1).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 73: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-DD

If Ti has the RF qi (F (t)), i = 1, 2, then:

T1 ≤ST T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 ≥ 1 in (0, 1).

T1 ≤HR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 decreases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤RHR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 increases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤LR T2 for all F if and only if q′2/q′1 decreases.

T1 ≤MRL T2 for all F such that E (T1) ≤ E (T2) if q2/q1 isbathtub in (0, 1).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 74: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-DD

If Ti has the RF qi (F (t)), i = 1, 2, then:

T1 ≤ST T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 ≥ 1 in (0, 1).

T1 ≤HR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 decreases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤RHR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 increases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤LR T2 for all F if and only if q′2/q′1 decreases.

T1 ≤MRL T2 for all F such that E (T1) ≤ E (T2) if q2/q1 isbathtub in (0, 1).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 75: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-DD

If Ti has the RF qi (F (t)), i = 1, 2, then:

T1 ≤ST T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 ≥ 1 in (0, 1).

T1 ≤HR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 decreases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤RHR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 increases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤LR T2 for all F if and only if q′2/q′1 decreases.

T1 ≤MRL T2 for all F such that E (T1) ≤ E (T2) if q2/q1 isbathtub in (0, 1).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 76: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-DD

If Ti has the RF qi (F (t)), i = 1, 2, then:

T1 ≤ST T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 ≥ 1 in (0, 1).

T1 ≤HR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 decreases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤RHR T2 for all F if and only if q2/q1 increases in (0, 1).

T1 ≤LR T2 for all F if and only if q′2/q′1 decreases.

T1 ≤MRL T2 for all F such that E (T1) ≤ E (T2) if q2/q1 isbathtub in (0, 1).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 77: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-GDD

If Ti has RF Q i (F 1, . . . ,F n), i = 1, 2, then:

T1 ≤ST T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q1 ≤ Q2 in (0, 1)n.

T1 ≤HR T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q2/Q1 isdecreasing in (0, 1)n.

T1 ≤RHR T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q2/Q1 isincreasing in (0, 1)n.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 78: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-GDD

If Ti has RF Q i (F 1, . . . ,F n), i = 1, 2, then:

T1 ≤ST T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q1 ≤ Q2 in (0, 1)n.

T1 ≤HR T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q2/Q1 isdecreasing in (0, 1)n.

T1 ≤RHR T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q2/Q1 isincreasing in (0, 1)n.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 79: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-GDD

If Ti has RF Q i (F 1, . . . ,F n), i = 1, 2, then:

T1 ≤ST T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q1 ≤ Q2 in (0, 1)n.

T1 ≤HR T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q2/Q1 isdecreasing in (0, 1)n.

T1 ≤RHR T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q2/Q1 isincreasing in (0, 1)n.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 80: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-GDD

If Ti has RF Q i (F 1, . . . ,F n), i = 1, 2, then:

T1 ≤ST T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q1 ≤ Q2 in (0, 1)n.

T1 ≤HR T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q2/Q1 isdecreasing in (0, 1)n.

T1 ≤RHR T2 for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q2/Q1 isincreasing in (0, 1)n.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 81: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-System residual lifetimes

These results can be applied to compare Tt and T ∗t . For

example:

Tt ≤ST T ∗t (≥ST ) holds for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if

Qt ≤ Q∗t (≥) in (0, 1)n.

Tt ≤HR T ∗t (≥HR) for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q

∗t /Qt is

decreasing (increasing) in (0, 1)n.

Tt ≤RHR T ∗t (≥RHR) for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q∗

t /Qt isincreasing (decreasing) in (0, 1)n.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 82: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-System residual lifetimes

These results can be applied to compare Tt and T ∗t . For

example:

Tt ≤ST T ∗t (≥ST ) holds for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if

Qt ≤ Q∗t (≥) in (0, 1)n.

Tt ≤HR T ∗t (≥HR) for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q

∗t /Qt is

decreasing (increasing) in (0, 1)n.

Tt ≤RHR T ∗t (≥RHR) for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q∗

t /Qt isincreasing (decreasing) in (0, 1)n.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 83: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-System residual lifetimes

These results can be applied to compare Tt and T ∗t . For

example:

Tt ≤ST T ∗t (≥ST ) holds for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if

Qt ≤ Q∗t (≥) in (0, 1)n.

Tt ≤HR T ∗t (≥HR) for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q

∗t /Qt is

decreasing (increasing) in (0, 1)n.

Tt ≤RHR T ∗t (≥RHR) for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q∗

t /Qt isincreasing (decreasing) in (0, 1)n.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 84: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Distorted distributionsSystem residual lifetimes

Comparison results-System residual lifetimes

These results can be applied to compare Tt and T ∗t . For

example:

Tt ≤ST T ∗t (≥ST ) holds for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if

Qt ≤ Q∗t (≥) in (0, 1)n.

Tt ≤HR T ∗t (≥HR) for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q

∗t /Qt is

decreasing (increasing) in (0, 1)n.

Tt ≤RHR T ∗t (≥RHR) for all F 1, . . . ,F n if and only if Q∗

t /Qt isincreasing (decreasing) in (0, 1)n.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 85: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Parallel system with two ID components

T = max(X1,X2) where X1 and X2 have DF F .

Then FT (t) = q(F (t)) where

q(u) = Q(u, u) = 2u − K (u, u).

The RF of Tt = (T − t|T > t) is F t(x) = qt(F t(x)) where

qt(u) = Qt(u, u) =q(cu)

q(c)=

2cu − K (cu, cu)

2c − K (c , c),

c = F (t) and F t(x) = F (x + t)/c .

The RF of T ∗t = (T − t|T > t) is F

∗t (x) = q∗t (F t(x)) where

q∗t (u) = Q∗t (u, u) =

K (cu, c) + K (c , cu)− K (cu, cu)

K (c , c).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 86: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Parallel system with two ID components

T = max(X1,X2) where X1 and X2 have DF F .

Then FT (t) = q(F (t)) where

q(u) = Q(u, u) = 2u − K (u, u).

The RF of Tt = (T − t|T > t) is F t(x) = qt(F t(x)) where

qt(u) = Qt(u, u) =q(cu)

q(c)=

2cu − K (cu, cu)

2c − K (c , c),

c = F (t) and F t(x) = F (x + t)/c .

The RF of T ∗t = (T − t|T > t) is F

∗t (x) = q∗t (F t(x)) where

q∗t (u) = Q∗t (u, u) =

K (cu, c) + K (c , cu)− K (cu, cu)

K (c , c).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 87: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Parallel system with two ID components

T = max(X1,X2) where X1 and X2 have DF F .

Then FT (t) = q(F (t)) where

q(u) = Q(u, u) = 2u − K (u, u).

The RF of Tt = (T − t|T > t) is F t(x) = qt(F t(x)) where

qt(u) = Qt(u, u) =q(cu)

q(c)=

2cu − K (cu, cu)

2c − K (c , c),

c = F (t) and F t(x) = F (x + t)/c .

The RF of T ∗t = (T − t|T > t) is F

∗t (x) = q∗t (F t(x)) where

q∗t (u) = Q∗t (u, u) =

K (cu, c) + K (c , cu)− K (cu, cu)

K (c , c).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 88: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Parallel system with two ID components

T = max(X1,X2) where X1 and X2 have DF F .

Then FT (t) = q(F (t)) where

q(u) = Q(u, u) = 2u − K (u, u).

The RF of Tt = (T − t|T > t) is F t(x) = qt(F t(x)) where

qt(u) = Qt(u, u) =q(cu)

q(c)=

2cu − K (cu, cu)

2c − K (c , c),

c = F (t) and F t(x) = F (x + t)/c .

The RF of T ∗t = (T − t|T > t) is F

∗t (x) = q∗t (F t(x)) where

q∗t (u) = Q∗t (u, u) =

K (cu, c) + K (c , cu)− K (cu, cu)

K (c , c).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 89: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Parallel system with two ID components

Tt ≤ST T ∗t for all F if and only if qt ≤ q∗t in (0, 1), that is,

2cu − K (cu, cu)

2c − K (c , c)≤ K (cu, c) + K (c , cu)− K (cu, cu)

K (c , c). (6)

If K is EXC, it is equivalent to

Ψ(u) = [c−K (c , c)][K (cu, c)−K (cu, cu)]+c[K (cu, c)−uK (c , c)] ≥ 0.(7)

Condition (7) holds if

ψ(u) = K (cu, c)− uK (c , c) ≥ 0

for all u ∈ [0, 1].

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 90: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Parallel system with two ID components

Tt ≤ST T ∗t for all F if and only if qt ≤ q∗t in (0, 1), that is,

2cu − K (cu, cu)

2c − K (c , c)≤ K (cu, c) + K (c , cu)− K (cu, cu)

K (c , c). (6)

If K is EXC, it is equivalent to

Ψ(u) = [c−K (c , c)][K (cu, c)−K (cu, cu)]+c[K (cu, c)−uK (c , c)] ≥ 0.(7)

Condition (7) holds if

ψ(u) = K (cu, c)− uK (c , c) ≥ 0

for all u ∈ [0, 1].

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 91: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Parallel system with two ID components

Tt ≤ST T ∗t for all F if and only if qt ≤ q∗t in (0, 1), that is,

2cu − K (cu, cu)

2c − K (c , c)≤ K (cu, c) + K (c , cu)− K (cu, cu)

K (c , c). (6)

If K is EXC, it is equivalent to

Ψ(u) = [c−K (c , c)][K (cu, c)−K (cu, cu)]+c[K (cu, c)−uK (c , c)] ≥ 0.(7)

Condition (7) holds if

ψ(u) = K (cu, c)− uK (c , c) ≥ 0

for all u ∈ [0, 1].

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 92: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Clayton copula

If K is the Clayton copula

K (u, v) =(u−θ + v−θ − 1

)−1/θ, θ > 0,

then

ψ(u) =(u−θc−θ + c−θ − 1

)−1/θ−

(u−θc−θ + u−θ[c−θ − 1]

)−1/θ.

Since θ > 0 and u−θ ≥ 1 for u ∈ (0, 1), ψ is nonnegative in(0, 1) for all c .

Therefore Tt ≤ST T ∗t holds for all F and all t ≥ 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 93: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Clayton copula

If K is the Clayton copula

K (u, v) =(u−θ + v−θ − 1

)−1/θ, θ > 0,

then

ψ(u) =(u−θc−θ + c−θ − 1

)−1/θ−

(u−θc−θ + u−θ[c−θ − 1]

)−1/θ.

Since θ > 0 and u−θ ≥ 1 for u ∈ (0, 1), ψ is nonnegative in(0, 1) for all c .

Therefore Tt ≤ST T ∗t holds for all F and all t ≥ 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 94: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Clayton copula

If K is the Clayton copula

K (u, v) =(u−θ + v−θ − 1

)−1/θ, θ > 0,

then

ψ(u) =(u−θc−θ + c−θ − 1

)−1/θ−

(u−θc−θ + u−θ[c−θ − 1]

)−1/θ.

Since θ > 0 and u−θ ≥ 1 for u ∈ (0, 1), ψ is nonnegative in(0, 1) for all c .

Therefore Tt ≤ST T ∗t holds for all F and all t ≥ 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 95: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Figure: Reliability functions of Tt (black) and T ∗t (red) when t = 1,

F (x) = e−x and θ = 2.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 96: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

If K is the Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

K (u, v) = uv exp [−θ(ln u)(ln v)] , θ ∈ (0, 1], (8)

then by plotting Ψ(u), we see that it takes positive andnegative values in the set [0, 1] when θ = 1.

Therefore Tt and T ∗t are not ST ordered (for all F and t).

These conditions lead to a Gumbel bivariate exponential witha negative correlation.

For example it does not hold when t = 1, F (x) = e−x andθ = 1.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 97: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

If K is the Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

K (u, v) = uv exp [−θ(ln u)(ln v)] , θ ∈ (0, 1], (8)

then by plotting Ψ(u), we see that it takes positive andnegative values in the set [0, 1] when θ = 1.

Therefore Tt and T ∗t are not ST ordered (for all F and t).

These conditions lead to a Gumbel bivariate exponential witha negative correlation.

For example it does not hold when t = 1, F (x) = e−x andθ = 1.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 98: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

If K is the Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

K (u, v) = uv exp [−θ(ln u)(ln v)] , θ ∈ (0, 1], (8)

then by plotting Ψ(u), we see that it takes positive andnegative values in the set [0, 1] when θ = 1.

Therefore Tt and T ∗t are not ST ordered (for all F and t).

These conditions lead to a Gumbel bivariate exponential witha negative correlation.

For example it does not hold when t = 1, F (x) = e−x andθ = 1.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 99: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

If K is the Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

K (u, v) = uv exp [−θ(ln u)(ln v)] , θ ∈ (0, 1], (8)

then by plotting Ψ(u), we see that it takes positive andnegative values in the set [0, 1] when θ = 1.

Therefore Tt and T ∗t are not ST ordered (for all F and t).

These conditions lead to a Gumbel bivariate exponential witha negative correlation.

For example it does not hold when t = 1, F (x) = e−x andθ = 1.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 100: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Figure: Reliability functions of Tt (black) and T ∗t (red) when t = 1,

F (x) = e−x and θ = 1.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 101: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

Now we can study if Tt ≤MRL T ∗t holds.

By plotting the ratio g(u) = qt(u)/q∗t (u) for t = 1 we seethat it is first decreasing in (0, u0) and then increasing in(u0, 1] for a u0 ∈ (0, 1).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 102: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

Now we can study if Tt ≤MRL T ∗t holds.

By plotting the ratio g(u) = qt(u)/q∗t (u) for t = 1 we seethat it is first decreasing in (0, u0) and then increasing in(u0, 1] for a u0 ∈ (0, 1).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 103: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Figure: Ratio g(u) = qt(u)/q∗t (u) for t = 1, F (x) = e−x andθ = 0.1, 0.2, . . . , 1 (from the bottom to the top).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 104: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

Now we can study if Tt ≤MRL T ∗t holds.

By plotting the ratio g(u) = qt(u)/q∗t (u) for t = 1 we seethat it is first decreasing in (0, u0) and then increasing in(u0, 1] for a u0 ∈ (0, 1).

Hence Tt ≥MRL T ∗t for all F such that E (Tt) ≥ E (T ∗

t ).

For example, if t = 1, F (x) = e−x and θ = 1, then

E (Tt) = 1.05615 > E (T ∗t ) = 0.77366.

So Tt ≥MRL T ∗t for t = 1 and F (x) = e−x !!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 105: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

Now we can study if Tt ≤MRL T ∗t holds.

By plotting the ratio g(u) = qt(u)/q∗t (u) for t = 1 we seethat it is first decreasing in (0, u0) and then increasing in(u0, 1] for a u0 ∈ (0, 1).

Hence Tt ≥MRL T ∗t for all F such that E (Tt) ≥ E (T ∗

t ).

For example, if t = 1, F (x) = e−x and θ = 1, then

E (Tt) = 1.05615 > E (T ∗t ) = 0.77366.

So Tt ≥MRL T ∗t for t = 1 and F (x) = e−x !!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 106: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 1: Gumbel-Barnett Archimedean copula

Now we can study if Tt ≤MRL T ∗t holds.

By plotting the ratio g(u) = qt(u)/q∗t (u) for t = 1 we seethat it is first decreasing in (0, u0) and then increasing in(u0, 1] for a u0 ∈ (0, 1).

Hence Tt ≥MRL T ∗t for all F such that E (Tt) ≥ E (T ∗

t ).

For example, if t = 1, F (x) = e−x and θ = 1, then

E (Tt) = 1.05615 > E (T ∗t ) = 0.77366.

So Tt ≥MRL T ∗t for t = 1 and F (x) = e−x !!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 107: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

If T = X2:2 = max(X1,X2), X1,X2 IND, then

Q2:2(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2.

For X1:2 = min(X1,X2), we have Q1:2(u1, u2) = u1u2.

Then X1:2 ≤HR X2:2 holds since

Q2:2(u1, u2)

Q1:2(u1, u2)=

1

u1+

1

u2− 1

is decreasing in (0, 1)2.

For X1, we have Q1(u1, u2) = u1.

Then X1 ≤HR X2:2 does not hold since

Q2:2(u1, u2)

Q1(u1, u2)= 1 +

u2

u1− u2

is decreasing in u1 but increasing in u2.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 108: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

If T = X2:2 = max(X1,X2), X1,X2 IND, then

Q2:2(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2.

For X1:2 = min(X1,X2), we have Q1:2(u1, u2) = u1u2.

Then X1:2 ≤HR X2:2 holds since

Q2:2(u1, u2)

Q1:2(u1, u2)=

1

u1+

1

u2− 1

is decreasing in (0, 1)2.

For X1, we have Q1(u1, u2) = u1.

Then X1 ≤HR X2:2 does not hold since

Q2:2(u1, u2)

Q1(u1, u2)= 1 +

u2

u1− u2

is decreasing in u1 but increasing in u2.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 109: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

If T = X2:2 = max(X1,X2), X1,X2 IND, then

Q2:2(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2.

For X1:2 = min(X1,X2), we have Q1:2(u1, u2) = u1u2.

Then X1:2 ≤HR X2:2 holds since

Q2:2(u1, u2)

Q1:2(u1, u2)=

1

u1+

1

u2− 1

is decreasing in (0, 1)2.

For X1, we have Q1(u1, u2) = u1.

Then X1 ≤HR X2:2 does not hold since

Q2:2(u1, u2)

Q1(u1, u2)= 1 +

u2

u1− u2

is decreasing in u1 but increasing in u2.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 110: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

If T = X2:2 = max(X1,X2), X1,X2 IND, then

Q2:2(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2.

For X1:2 = min(X1,X2), we have Q1:2(u1, u2) = u1u2.

Then X1:2 ≤HR X2:2 holds since

Q2:2(u1, u2)

Q1:2(u1, u2)=

1

u1+

1

u2− 1

is decreasing in (0, 1)2.

For X1, we have Q1(u1, u2) = u1.

Then X1 ≤HR X2:2 does not hold since

Q2:2(u1, u2)

Q1(u1, u2)= 1 +

u2

u1− u2

is decreasing in u1 but increasing in u2.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 111: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

If T = X2:2 = max(X1,X2), X1,X2 IND, then

Q2:2(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2.

For X1:2 = min(X1,X2), we have Q1:2(u1, u2) = u1u2.

Then X1:2 ≤HR X2:2 holds since

Q2:2(u1, u2)

Q1:2(u1, u2)=

1

u1+

1

u2− 1

is decreasing in (0, 1)2.

For X1, we have Q1(u1, u2) = u1.

Then X1 ≤HR X2:2 does not hold since

Q2:2(u1, u2)

Q1(u1, u2)= 1 +

u2

u1− u2

is decreasing in u1 but increasing in u2.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 112: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Figure: Hazard rate functions of Xi (red), X1:2 (blue) and X2:2 (black)when Xi ≡ Exp(µ = 1/i), i = 1, 2.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 113: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

If X1,X2 are IID with DF F , then X1 ≤HR X2:2 holds for all Fsince

q(u)

u=

2u − u2

u= 2− u

is a decreasing in u in the set [0, 1].

Even more, X1 ≤LR X2:2 holds for all F since

q′(u)

1= 2− 2u

is a decreasing function in [0, 1] for all t > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 114: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

If X1,X2 are IID with DF F , then X1 ≤HR X2:2 holds for all Fsince

q(u)

u=

2u − u2

u= 2− u

is a decreasing in u in the set [0, 1].

Even more, X1 ≤LR X2:2 holds for all F since

q′(u)

1= 2− 2u

is a decreasing function in [0, 1] for all t > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 115: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

For the residual lifetimes we have

Q∗t (u1, u2) = Q2:2(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2,

Qt(u1, u2) =c1u1 + c2u2 − c1c2u1u2

c1 + c2 − c1c2,

where c1 = F 1(t) and c2 = F 2(t).

Tt ≤HR T ∗t holds for all F1,F2 if and only if

Q(u1, u2)

Qt(u1, u2)=

(u1 + u2 − u1u2) (c1 + c2 − c1c2)

c1u1 + c2 − c1c2u1u2

is decreasing in the set [0, 1]2.

As this property is not true, they are not HR ordered.

Therefore Theorem 3 in Li and Lu (PEIS,2003) is not correct.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 116: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

For the residual lifetimes we have

Q∗t (u1, u2) = Q2:2(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2,

Qt(u1, u2) =c1u1 + c2u2 − c1c2u1u2

c1 + c2 − c1c2,

where c1 = F 1(t) and c2 = F 2(t).

Tt ≤HR T ∗t holds for all F1,F2 if and only if

Q(u1, u2)

Qt(u1, u2)=

(u1 + u2 − u1u2) (c1 + c2 − c1c2)

c1u1 + c2 − c1c2u1u2

is decreasing in the set [0, 1]2.

As this property is not true, they are not HR ordered.

Therefore Theorem 3 in Li and Lu (PEIS,2003) is not correct.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 117: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

For the residual lifetimes we have

Q∗t (u1, u2) = Q2:2(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2,

Qt(u1, u2) =c1u1 + c2u2 − c1c2u1u2

c1 + c2 − c1c2,

where c1 = F 1(t) and c2 = F 2(t).

Tt ≤HR T ∗t holds for all F1,F2 if and only if

Q(u1, u2)

Qt(u1, u2)=

(u1 + u2 − u1u2) (c1 + c2 − c1c2)

c1u1 + c2 − c1c2u1u2

is decreasing in the set [0, 1]2.

As this property is not true, they are not HR ordered.

Therefore Theorem 3 in Li and Lu (PEIS,2003) is not correct.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 118: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

For the residual lifetimes we have

Q∗t (u1, u2) = Q2:2(u1, u2) = u1 + u2 − u1u2,

Qt(u1, u2) =c1u1 + c2u2 − c1c2u1u2

c1 + c2 − c1c2,

where c1 = F 1(t) and c2 = F 2(t).

Tt ≤HR T ∗t holds for all F1,F2 if and only if

Q(u1, u2)

Qt(u1, u2)=

(u1 + u2 − u1u2) (c1 + c2 − c1c2)

c1u1 + c2 − c1c2u1u2

is decreasing in the set [0, 1]2.

As this property is not true, they are not HR ordered.

Therefore Theorem 3 in Li and Lu (PEIS,2003) is not correct.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 119: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

If X1,X2 are IID with DF F , then Tt ≤HR T ∗t holds for all F

sinceq(u)

qt(u)=

2− u

2− uF (t)

(2− F (t)

)is decreasing in u in the set [0, 1].

Even more, Tt ≤LR T ∗t holds for all F since

q′(u)

q′t(u)=

1− u

1− uF (t)

(2− F (t)

)is a decreasing function in [0, 1] for all t > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 120: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 2: Parallel system with two INID components

If X1,X2 are IID with DF F , then Tt ≤HR T ∗t holds for all F

sinceq(u)

qt(u)=

2− u

2− uF (t)

(2− F (t)

)is decreasing in u in the set [0, 1].

Even more, Tt ≤LR T ∗t holds for all F since

q′(u)

q′t(u)=

1− u

1− uF (t)

(2− F (t)

)is a decreasing function in [0, 1] for all t > 0.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 121: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Figure: Ratio F∗t /F t for t = 1, F 1(x) = e−x and F 2(x) = e−x/2 (black)

or F 2(x) = e−x (red).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 122: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 3: Coherent system with DID components

����

3����

2

����

1

Figure: System in Example 3.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 123: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 3: Coherent system with DID components

T = max(X1,min(X2,X3)), X1,X2,X3 DID with DF F .

Then P1 = {1}, P2 = {2, 3} and

q(u) = u + K (1, u, u)− K (u, u, u).

Therefore qt(u) = q(cu)/q(c) and

q∗t (u) =K (cu, c , c) + K (c , cu, cu)− K (cu, cu, cu)

K (c , c , c),

where c = F (t).

We assume a Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern (FGM) copula

K (u, v ,w) = uvw(1 + θ(1− u)(1− v)(1− w)), θ ∈ [−1, 1].

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 124: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 3: Coherent system with DID components

T = max(X1,min(X2,X3)), X1,X2,X3 DID with DF F .

Then P1 = {1}, P2 = {2, 3} and

q(u) = u + K (1, u, u)− K (u, u, u).

Therefore qt(u) = q(cu)/q(c) and

q∗t (u) =K (cu, c , c) + K (c , cu, cu)− K (cu, cu, cu)

K (c , c , c),

where c = F (t).

We assume a Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern (FGM) copula

K (u, v ,w) = uvw(1 + θ(1− u)(1− v)(1− w)), θ ∈ [−1, 1].

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 125: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 3: Coherent system with DID components

T = max(X1,min(X2,X3)), X1,X2,X3 DID with DF F .

Then P1 = {1}, P2 = {2, 3} and

q(u) = u + K (1, u, u)− K (u, u, u).

Therefore qt(u) = q(cu)/q(c) and

q∗t (u) =K (cu, c , c) + K (c , cu, cu)− K (cu, cu, cu)

K (c , c , c),

where c = F (t).

We assume a Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern (FGM) copula

K (u, v ,w) = uvw(1 + θ(1− u)(1− v)(1− w)), θ ∈ [−1, 1].

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 126: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 3: Coherent system with DID components

T = max(X1,min(X2,X3)), X1,X2,X3 DID with DF F .

Then P1 = {1}, P2 = {2, 3} and

q(u) = u + K (1, u, u)− K (u, u, u).

Therefore qt(u) = q(cu)/q(c) and

q∗t (u) =K (cu, c , c) + K (c , cu, cu)− K (cu, cu, cu)

K (c , c , c),

where c = F (t).

We assume a Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern (FGM) copula

K (u, v ,w) = uvw(1 + θ(1− u)(1− v)(1− w)), θ ∈ [−1, 1].

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 127: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Figure: Ratio g(u) = q∗t (u)/qt(u) for t = 1, F (x) = e−x andθ = −1,−0.9, . . . , 1 (from the bottom to the top).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 128: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 3: Coherent system with DID components

As g(u) = q∗t (u)/qt(u) ≥ 1, then Tt ≤ST T ∗t .

As g(u) = q∗t (u)/qt(u) is not monotone, then Tt and T ∗t are

not HR ordered.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 129: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Example 3: Coherent system with DID components

As g(u) = q∗t (u)/qt(u) ≥ 1, then Tt ≤ST T ∗t .

As g(u) = q∗t (u)/qt(u) is not monotone, then Tt and T ∗t are

not HR ordered.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 130: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Further results

Navarro and Durante (2016):

Case 3: T(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t =

(T − t|H(i1,...,ir )

t1,...,tr ,t

)where the (past)

history of the system can be represented as

H(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t = {Xi1 = t1, . . . ,Xir = tr ,Xj > t for j /∈ {i1, . . . , ir}},

where 0 < r < n, 0 < t1 < · · · < tr < t, Pr(H

(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t

)> 0

and the event H(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t implies T > t.

This case can also be represented as

Pr(T − t > x |H(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t) = Q

(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t(F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n,t(x)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 131: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Further results

Navarro and Durante (2016):

Case 3: T(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t =

(T − t|H(i1,...,ir )

t1,...,tr ,t

)where the (past)

history of the system can be represented as

H(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t = {Xi1 = t1, . . . ,Xir = tr ,Xj > t for j /∈ {i1, . . . , ir}},

where 0 < r < n, 0 < t1 < · · · < tr < t, Pr(H

(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t

)> 0

and the event H(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t implies T > t.

This case can also be represented as

Pr(T − t > x |H(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t) = Q

(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t(F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n,t(x)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 132: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Further results

Navarro and Durante (2016):

Case 3: T(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t =

(T − t|H(i1,...,ir )

t1,...,tr ,t

)where the (past)

history of the system can be represented as

H(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t = {Xi1 = t1, . . . ,Xir = tr ,Xj > t for j /∈ {i1, . . . , ir}},

where 0 < r < n, 0 < t1 < · · · < tr < t, Pr(H

(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t

)> 0

and the event H(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t implies T > t.

This case can also be represented as

Pr(T − t > x |H(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t) = Q

(i1,...,ir )t1,...,tr ,t(F 1,t(x), . . . ,F n,t(x)).

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 133: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Further results

Navarro, Pellerey and Longobardi (2016), Inactivity times:

Case 1: At time t we know that the system has failed. Theinactivity time is

tT = (t − T |T ≤ t).

Case 2: At time t we know which components W are working.The other W c have failed, that is, At = {XW > t,XW c ≤ t},where XW = mini∈W Xi and XW c

= maxi∈W c Xi , forW ⊂ {1, . . . , n}. If At implies T < t, the inactivity time is

tTW = (t − T |XW > t,XW c ≤ t).

These cases can also be represented as DD.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 134: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Further results

Navarro, Pellerey and Longobardi (2016), Inactivity times:

Case 1: At time t we know that the system has failed. Theinactivity time is

tT = (t − T |T ≤ t).

Case 2: At time t we know which components W are working.The other W c have failed, that is, At = {XW > t,XW c ≤ t},where XW = mini∈W Xi and XW c

= maxi∈W c Xi , forW ⊂ {1, . . . , n}. If At implies T < t, the inactivity time is

tTW = (t − T |XW > t,XW c ≤ t).

These cases can also be represented as DD.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 135: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Further results

Navarro, Pellerey and Longobardi (2016), Inactivity times:

Case 1: At time t we know that the system has failed. Theinactivity time is

tT = (t − T |T ≤ t).

Case 2: At time t we know which components W are working.The other W c have failed, that is, At = {XW > t,XW c ≤ t},where XW = mini∈W Xi and XW c

= maxi∈W c Xi , forW ⊂ {1, . . . , n}. If At implies T < t, the inactivity time is

tTW = (t − T |XW > t,XW c ≤ t).

These cases can also be represented as DD.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 136: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

Further results

Navarro, Pellerey and Longobardi (2016), Inactivity times:

Case 1: At time t we know that the system has failed. Theinactivity time is

tT = (t − T |T ≤ t).

Case 2: At time t we know which components W are working.The other W c have failed, that is, At = {XW > t,XW c ≤ t},where XW = mini∈W Xi and XW c

= maxi∈W c Xi , forW ⊂ {1, . . . , n}. If At implies T < t, the inactivity time is

tTW = (t − T |XW > t,XW c ≤ t).

These cases can also be represented as DD.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 137: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

References on distorted distributions and systems.

Navarro J., Gomis C. (2016). Comparisons in the meanresidual life order of coherent systems with identicallydistributed components. Applied Stochastic Models inBusiness and Industry 32 (1), 33–47.

Navarro J., del Aguila Y., Sordo M.A., Suarez-LlorensA.(2013). Stochastic ordering properties for systems withdependent identically distributed components. Appl StochMod Bus Ind 29, 264–278.

Navarro J., del Aguila Y., Sordo M.A., Suarez-Llorens A.(2016). Preservation of stochastic orders under the formationof generalized distorted distributions. Applications to coherentsystems. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability18, 529–545.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 138: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

References on residual lifetimes

Navarro J. (2016). Comparisons of the residual lifetimes ofcoherent systems under different assumptions. To appear inStatistical Papers. Published online first June 2016. DOI10.1007/s00362-016-0789-0

Navarro J., Durante F. (2016). Copula–based representationsfor the reliability of the residual lifetimes of coherent systemswith dependent components. Submitted.

Navarro J., Pellerey F., Longobardi M. (2016). Copularepresentations for the inactivity times of coherent systemswith dependent components. Submitted.

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 139: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

References

For the more references, please visit my personal web page:

https : //webs.um.es/jorgenav/

Thank you for your attention!!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]

Page 140: Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems 2017. 3. 9. · Representations Comparison results Examples Dependence Models and Copulas in Coherent Systems Jorge Navarro1 Universidad

RepresentationsComparison results

Examples

Example 1Example 2Example 3

References

For the more references, please visit my personal web page:

https : //webs.um.es/jorgenav/

Thank you for your attention!!

CFE 2016, Sevilla J. Navarro, E-mail: [email protected]