demographic development in estonia: main trends and outlook for the future
DESCRIPTION
University of Latvia conference Section: Population Development and Demographic Policy Challenges Riga, Latvia, 11-12 February, 2014. Demographic development in Estonia: main trends and outlook for the future. Luule Sakkeus Allan Puur Leen Rahnu - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Demographic development in Estonia: main trends and outlook for the future
Luule Sakkeus Allan Puur Leen RahnuEstonian Institute for Population Studies, Tallinn University
University of Latvia conferenceSection: Population Development and Demographic Policy Challenges
Riga, Latvia, 11-12 February, 2014
Outline of the presentation
Different processes Fertility, mortality, ageing
Population change
Different analytical perspectives Trends since 1960, outook until 2050
Comparison with major regions of Europe
Period and cohort view
Native and foreign-origin population
Please see population chapter in Estonian HD report 2012/2013
(http://www.kogu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/EIA2013_eng.pdf).
1. Fertility and family
Total fertility rateEstonia and major regions of Europe 1960-2011
Replacement level
Total fertility rateEstonia and EU-10 counrtries 1990-2011
Mean age at first birthEstonia and major regions of Europe 1960-2011
Shift from one group to another
The impact of tempo-distortionon observed period fertility rates
Postponement of childbearing reduces observed period fertilityAppropriate estimation methods were developed in the late 1990s
John Bongaarts & GriffiihFeeney (1998). On the Quantum and Tempo of Fertility. Population and Development Review. 24(2): 271–291.
The impact of tempo-distortion on period TFREstonia 1955-2010
Estimates of cohort fertilityEstonia, birth cohorts 1965-1985
Estimates were confirmed by 2011 census
Childbearing intentionsEstonia, birth cohorts 1955-1984
Childbearing intentionsEU25 countries, Eurobarometer 2006
Educational and ethnic differences in cohort fertility
Replacement level
Proportion on non-marital birthsEstonia and major regions of Europe 1960-2011
Fertility: some conclusions Estonia has featured below replacement fertility starting from cohorts born at the beginning of the 20th century; among native population, only cohorts born in the late 1950s and early 1960s have reached replacement level
Among foreign-origin population fertility has been ca 15% lower ever since cohorts born in the 1930s
Fertility has declined since the 1980s but the extent of decline differs significantly between the period and cohort perspective
Cohorts born in the mid-1970s will have completed fertility around 1,85 (ethnic Estonians slightly higher); period fertility measures are pushed downwards by fertility postponement that started in the early 1990s and is expected to continue until the 2020s
Education is negatively associated to completed fertility (highly educated as target group for family policies?)
2. Mortality
Life expectancy at birth: womenEstonia and major regions of Europe 1960-2011
Shift from one group to another
7 years
2-3 years
2011 female life expectancy 81,1 (Estonians 81,8)
Life expectancy at birth: menEstonia and major regions of Europe 1960-2011
2011 male life expectancy 71,2 (Estonians 72,4)
Disadvantage 3-5 years
12-13 years
7 years
Infant mortality rateEstonia and major regions of Europe 1960-2011
Shift from one group to another
Return shift?
Mortality: some conclusions Estonia experienced a remarkably long period of mortality stagnation (from the 1960s to the
1990s)
Societal changes in the 1990s were accompanied by a dramatic upsurge in mortality rates that culminated in 1994
Since mid-1990s Estonia has experienced a relatively rapid improvement in mortality patterns; the main driving force behind the new trend is rapid reduction in cardiovascular mortality
In recent years, female life expectancy has been among the highest in Eastern Europe. It lags 2-3 years behind the average of Northern, Western and Southern Europe
Although rapid improvements are observed also for men, the disadvantage in life expectancy relative to Northern, Western and Southern Europe amounts to about 7 years
In infant mortality, the disadvatage has almost disappeared
3. Ageing and population change
Proportion of 65+ populationEstonia and major regions of Europe 1960-2011
Shift from one group to another
Accelerated ageing
Population changeEstonia and major regions of Europe 1960-2011
1960-1989: rapid growth+ 364 thousands = + 30%
1990-2011: rapid decline - 276 thousands = -17,6%
2000-11: -78 thousands -5.7%
Population change: natural increaseEstonia and major regions of Europe 1960-2011
1960-1989: + 168 thousands = + 14%
1990-2011: -80 thousands = - 5,1%
2000-11: -34 thousands = - 2.5%
Population change: net migrationEstonia and major regions of Europe 1960-2011
1960-1989: + 196 thousands = + 16%
1990-2011: -196 thousands = - 12,4%
2000-11: -44 thousands = - 3,2%
Net migration rate 1960-2011: Estonia and major regions of Europe
High immigration
Return migration
Population changeEstonians and other groups 1960-2011
1960-1989Estonians +7.7% (NI +4.1%, NM 3.6%)Others +95.0% (NI 42.4%, NM 52.6%)
1990-2011Estonians -6.4% (NI -3.7%, NM -2.7%)Others -35.6% (NI -7.3%, NM -28.8%)
2000-2011Estonians -3.0% (NI -1.2%, NM -1.8%)Others -11.6% (NI -5.2%, NM -6.4%)
Population numberEstonians and other groups 1960-2011
Estonians in 1959: 892 thousands
Estonians in 2011: 902 thousands
Estonians in 1989: 963 thousands
Others in 1959: 304 thousands
Others in 1989: 602 thousands Others in 2011:
392 thousands
Population changeEstonia and countries of Europe 2000-2011
Ageing and population change: some conclusions
Following a prolonged period of supressed ageing, the proportion of elderly beging to increase rapidly, driven by combined effect of low fertility, return migration and large migrant cohorts reaching retirement age.
Since WWII population dynamics in Estonia has been driven excessively by migration. Until 1990, at least 4/5 of rapid growth was due to direct and indirect effects of migration, after 1990, the return migration made the most important single contribution to population dynamics.
The role of migration is highlighted by the comparison of native and foreign-origin population. In relative terms, in 2000-2011 the negative natural increase and negative net migration among exceeded foreign-origin population exceeded that among the native population about three times.
4. Outlook for the future
Projected population number in 2050Estonia in UN medium projections 1994-2010
Release of projection (updated every 2 years)
thousands
Too pessimistic (reflects return migration and very low fertility of the 1990s)
Maybe too optimistic (base population overstated, very limited net migration, strong recovery of fertility)
Projected population number in 2050Estonia and European countries, UN medium 2010
Estonia (TFR2050=1,96 or 1,64)
Lithuania
Latvia
population decrease -8% medium -14% constant fertility
Projected proportion of 65+ in 2050Estonia and European countries, UN medium 2010
Estonia 2010: 17.4%2050: 24.7% or 25.4%
Latvia
Lithuania
Old-age dependency ratio 1950-2050Estonia and regions of Europe, UN medium 2010
Adaptation: postponement of retirement education and retraining, productivity better health not too low fertility not too much emigration in long run
70+/20-69
70+/25-69
Outlook for the future: some conclusions Several trends for next 30-40 years can be predicted with reasonable accuracy
As smaller cohorts born after 1990 will predominate reproductive age groups, the balance between deaths and births will inevitably become more negative. It is important to employ measures to support family formation and childbearing in these generations so that the gap between completed fertility and replacement level would be smaller
Population ageing will continue but with combined efforts of sustaining employment of older persons, retraining, improvements in health behaviour etc. it should be possible to cope with the challenges arising from ageing
Migration processes have become dynamics and more difficult to predict, introducing considerable uncertainty for the demographic outlook
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!