decomposing programmes

29
DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES DANIEL KOCH | JESPER STEEN | KTH SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE | WWW.ARCH.KTH.SE Re-coding hospital work with spatially syntactic information

Upload: kieu

Post on 15-Feb-2016

65 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES. Re-coding hospital work with spatially syntactic information. Daniel Koch | Jesper Steen | KTH School of Architecture | www.arch.kth.se. I. Background. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

DANIEL KOCH | JESPER STEEN | KTH SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE | WWW.ARCH.KTH.SE

Re-coding hospital work with spatially syntactic information

Page 2: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

I BACKGROUND

I BACKGROUND

Workplace environments have been thoroughly studied within space syntax research, providing a series of results but also consistently challenged the field in that few clear and consistent correlations have been found, that some results appear to be contradictory, and that to certain extents spatial configuration have appeared to be of little importance for the performance of organizations.

In this paper, we will focus our attention to a central question for these works that has in part already been made in them but can be done more thoroughly, which is to argue for a refined description of the work similar to the refined descriptions of space developed within the field. The outset of this is to try and find descriptions of work that have spatial content (instead of e.g. organizational), similar to how the origins of space syntax comes from finding spatial descriptions that contains social content.

Page 3: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

I BACKGROUND

Forensic Psychiatry Clinic

Depa

rtmen

t of D

ental

Med

icine

(KI U

niver

sity)

NOVUMGarage/ParkingStaff

N

M M K K FC

I

R B B

A1

I6

I1-5

M4:2

M4:1

F2:2

F2:1

P2:2

P2:1

M2:2

M2:1

B4:2

B4:1

K4:2

K4:1

B2:2

B2:1

K2:2

K2:1

C2:2

C2:1

C1:2

C1:1

B87

M81-83 K71-73 K81-83

M81-83, K81-83, B87K71-73

Emergency Ward

Main Access Road (Hälsovägen)

8

6

4

2

Page 4: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

I BACKGROUND

Page 5: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II METHOD

II METHODI

Page 6: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II METHODI

Page 7: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II METHODI

Page 8: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II METHODI

Page 9: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II METHODI

Page 10: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II METHODI

Page 11: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

III DE-COMPOSITION

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

Page 12: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

“[…] it is crucial that reading as an activity remains intensely related to its environment. Reading is absorption and concentration with the eyes on the page, but also seeing and feeling and hearing the paper of the page and the book, and letting the eyes wander and rest on the table, on the walls, and, through the windows, stare at the landscape and the sky – all while staying ‘in’ the reading. Because reading is a situation that ‘takes place’, it is important to investigate in detail how the experience of space becomes part of the activity of reading.”

(Verschaffel, 2010, p. 89)

Page 13: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

reading at home

reading in nature

reading among the crowd

reading in the study room

reading in the library

Page 14: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

E

E

E

P

P

P

Condition with need of surveillance but not contact

Condition where recognition and/or contact is important

Condition where perceived presence of others is important

Concentrated work with need for good

overview

Work with short questions or

communication

Concentrated work with need to be easily

found

Page 15: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

E

E

E

E

E

E

Work with short questions with need to be easily found

Work with short questions or communication

Concentrated work with need for good overview

Concentrated work with need for good

overview

Work with short questions or

communication

Concentrated work with need to be easily

found

Page 16: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

E

E

E

E

E

E

Visual relation

Direct contact

Technical communication

Visual relation

Direct contact

Technical communication

Visual relation

Work with short questions with need to be easily found

Work with short questions or communication

Concentrated work with need for good overview

Concentrated work with need for good

overview

Work with short questions or

communication

Concentrated work with need to be easily

found

Page 17: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

(Koch 2007)

EXCLUSIVE/ENDCAP

OTHER/PASSED BY

OTHER/PASSED BY

TREND/EXPOSED ANDAVAILABLE

HIDD

EN E EE

E

E

Page 18: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

(Koch 2009)

Page 19: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

E

E

E

M

M

M

Person moving a lot, or whose movement needs to be tracked

Work with short questions or communication

Person moving with (main) purpose of getting an overview

Concentrated work with need for good

overview

Work with short questions or

communication

Concentrated work with need to be easily

found

Page 20: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

(Koch 2009)

Page 21: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II DE-COMPOSITIONI III

(Koch 2009)

Page 22: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

IV INTRINSIC TENSIONS

II INTRINSIC TENSIONSI IIIIV

In control of interaction

Others control interaction

Available Undisturbed

Page 23: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II INTRINSIC TENSIONSI IIIIV

Socialexchange

Professionalexchange

Small group Large group

Page 24: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

II INTRINSIC TENSIONSI IIIIV

Movementefficiency

Informationgathering

Close by Far away

Page 25: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

V A SIMPLE EXAMPLE

V A SIMPLE EXAMPLEIIIIIIIV

Page 26: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

V A SIMPLE EXAMPLEIIIIIIIV

Page 27: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

V A SIMPLE EXAMPLEIIIIIIIV

Page 28: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

V A SIMPLE EXAMPLEIIIIIIIV

Page 29: DECOMPOSING PROGRAMMES

VI CONCLUSION

V CONCLUSIONIIIIIIIV VI

Based on the argument above, it may appear as the argument is for a break-down of every workplace or an organization into a myriad of activities with complex descriptions of them each. This is not the intention.

The intention is rather to say that this is something that needs to be done in a number of iterations so as to better understand the nature of ‘work’ in different organizations, to then better be able to define what sort of analysis to be conducted (i.e. what are the spatially relevant roles and tasks).

These will then have certain spatial properties in them which have both contextual dependencies (e.g. closeness or exposure), contextual impact (e.g. ‘not close to’, ‘boisterous’), systemic dependencies (integrated, segregated) and symbolic or hierarchic positioning (such as representations of power in the various forms it takes).