decadal variations of sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

25
Decadal variations of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”) Wes Lockwood, Lowell Observatory Gregory Henry, TSU

Upload: thom

Post on 24-Feb-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Decadal variations of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”). Wes Lockwood, Lowell Observatory Gregory Henry, TSU. Robotic photometry 1993-2014. 4 telescopes measure 300 Sun-like stars. Lou Boyd, input. Greg Henry, output. Tennessee State Univ. telescopes at Fairborn Observatory. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Decadal variations of Sun-like stars

(“solar variability after dark”)

Wes Lockwood, Lowell ObservatoryGregory Henry, TSU

Page 2: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Robotic photometry 1993-2014

Tennessee State Univ. telescopes at Fairborn Observatory

Lou Boyd, input

Greg Henry, output

4 telescopes measure 300 Sun-like stars

Page 3: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

18 Sco, still our favorite solar twin

Page 4: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

18 Sco, the “solar twin”Fairborn observations 2000 – 2013 20124

Range ~0.1%

Page 5: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

18 Sco minus star A

18 Sco minus star B

18 Sco minus rejected star C

star A minus rejected star C

rejected star C minus star B

star B minus star A(selected best comp pair)

Range ~0.15%

Range ~0.08%

Range ~0.13%

Page 6: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

18 Sco’s Ca II and brightness variation vs. SORCE SIM surprise

b mag

y mag

S index

b y

b, y, and S are positively correlated in 18 Sco, as we find for most solar age stars...

…but SIM suggests b and y should vary differently

Page 7: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

The larger sample

Page 8: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Variability of the “solar twins”

b (472 nm ) y (571 nm)

A few stars have “negative” net variance due to comp. star variability

Page 9: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Variance in b / variance in y

Page 10: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Could we detect the Sun’s variability? Yes, but only for about 30% of the comparison star pairs

Cumulative distribution of comp. star rms

measurement noise

b y

ACRIM data degraded to 18 Sco window and precision

Page 11: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)
Page 12: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

18 Sco brightness - activity variation

Solar cycle 23brighter

Page 13: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Activity-brightness correlation

122 stars 28 stars

Age

The enlarged sample confirms earlier results

Page 14: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Detection sensitivityS/N of detection falls rapidly for σ < 0.0003 mag rms

Page 15: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

18 Sco minus each comp. star

Page 16: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Comp. star differential mags

Best pairA and B

b

y

Page 17: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

1984-2007: Measuring sunlike stars

night by night year by year

Lowell 0.5-m telescope

Brian Skiff, observer

1200 nights, 15 years, 6000 data sets,32 program stars, one (!) observer

Page 18: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

What we measure

Location of Strömgren b & y passbands

b y

Page 19: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Activity-brightness correlations

HK activity brightness variation

AgeAge

Age

Page 20: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Stellar activity & brightness variation

Ca II

(b+y)/2

comp. star

HD 1835 - a non-cycling starHD 1835 - a non-cycling star

HD1835 - a non-cycling star HD10476 – a cycling star

Page 21: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

A 45 - year perspectiveHD 1835 - a non-cycling star HD 10476 – a cycling star

Ca II

(b+y)/2

comp. star

Page 22: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Stellar activity & brightness variation

Ca II

(b+y)/2

comp. star

HD1835 - a non-cycling star HD10476 – a cycling star

1%

10%

Page 23: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Stellar activity & brightness variation

Ca II

(b+y)/2

comp. star

HD1835 - a non-cycling star HD10476 – a cycling star

1%

10%

Page 24: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Ratio of brightness & activity variation

Positive correlation

Negative correlation

Sun

18 Sco

Page 25: Decadal variations  of Sun-like stars (“solar variability after dark”)

Why this is a tough problem: stellar variability across the HR

diagram

Here’s the Sun

Illustration by M. Grenon