current status of amine-based co2 capture technology in kepco
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
중온용 건식 재생 CO2 흡수제 개발
Ji-Hyun Lee, No Sang Kwak, Kyung-Ryong Jang, In-Young Lee and Jae Goo Shim
KEPCO Research Institute
Carbon Capture and Storage
Legal Framework Development and Supply Chain Perspectives, 18 OCT 2011, Rome
Current Status of Amine-based CO2
Capture Technology in KEPCO
18, OCT 2011
WEC-Italy, Rome, 20112/19
Outline
KEPCO Overview
Policy and target of CCS in KEPCO
Project Overview
Test Results of Lab & 0.1MW Test Bed
Plan for Construction of 10MW Pilot Plant
Conclusion and Future Works
WEC-Italy, Rome, 20113/19
KEPCO Overview
KEPCO Group
Budget : 54.5 trillion won ( as of ‘11)
Personnel : 19,472 ( 36, 352 including Genco’s staffs, as of the end of ‘10)
WEC-Italy, Rome, 20114/19
Policy and Target of CCS in KEPCO
CCS-related policy in Korea & KEPCO
Major Area of KEPCO’s CCS R&D
- Power industry must take responsibility and take the lead for introducing CO2 free technology
- Commitment of the 30% GHG reduction below BAU by 2020
- Demonstration & deployment of CCS technology in 2020
CO2 Capture Technology
Post Combustion Oxy Fuel Combustion Pre Combustion
Dry SorbentProcess for IGCC
Dry SorbentProcess
Wet ScrubbingProcess
Chemical LoopingCombustion
Oxy Combustion
WEC-Italy, Rome, 20115/19
Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Technology
Lower energy for re-gen-era-tion
Higher capac-
ity
Less degradation
Lowervolatility
HighlyEfficient
Absorbent
Higher adsorption/desorption
rates
Lowercorrosivity
50~90% of total energy required
Wet Scrubbing CO2 Capture process Criteria for Solvent Selection
WEC-Italy, Rome, 20116/19
Project Overview
A-COS Project (Development of an Advanced CO2 Capture System)
Project Leader: KEPCO (12 participants)
Research Periods: NOV, 2008 ~ OCT, 2014 (6 Years)
Financially supported by the Korean government & participating companies
Target :
- Develop post-combustion CO2 separation technology by amine solvent at coal-fired power station - Develop new solvent with improved regeneration energy compared to MEA (Reduce regeneration energy above 30% than MEA) - Process design, construction & optimization (0.1MW CO2 capture plant (2010), 10MW Pilot plant until 2013)
WEC-Italy, Rome, 20117/19
Strategy
STRATEGY
1st Stage : `2008~11 2nd Stage : `2012~14 3rd Stage : `2015~20
Test bed
0.1MW Test Bed
Pilot Plant
10MWPilot Plant
Demonstration
500 MW
Capture Energy
Goal Development of an Advanced CO2 Capture System
• Develop advanced absorbent• Reduce regeneration energy
< 3.2 GJ/tonCO2 2.5~3.0 GJ/tonCO2
• Search innovative absorbent• Process innovation
< 2.5 GJ/tonCO2
WEC-Italy, Rome, 20118/19
Development Procedures
Fast Screening
Bench unit Test bed (0.1 MW)
V-L Equilibrium Degradation Corrosion
CFD & Molecular simulation
Economic Evaluation
WEC-Italy, Rome, 20119/19
MEA 30wt% KoSol-3 KoSol-4-10.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
3.9
2.8 2.6R
eg
en
era
tion
En
erg
y (
GJ/
ton
CO
2)
The regeneration energy of KoSol*-series is 30~35% lower than that of MEA
30% 35%
* KoSol : Korea Solvent
Experimental Condition CO2 concentration : 11~15% Gas volume : 2~10Nm3/hr Packing: Random packing
Test results : Regeneration Energy
BSU (Bench Scale Unit) CO2 Regeneration Energy
WEC-Italy, Rome, 201110/19
Test results : Degradation & Corrosion
• KoSol-Series are 55~93% lower than MEA
Experimental Condition
Oxidative Degradation- O2 : 98%- CO2 : 2%- Temperature : 60℃- Reaction time: 1,400 hr
MEA 30wt% KoSol-3 KoSol-4-10
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100
10 9
• KoSol-Series are 90% lower than MEA
Rel
ativ
e D
egra
dat
ion
90%
MEA 30wt%
KoSol-3 KoSol-4-10
10
20
30
40
50
60
60
27 4
55% 93%
Co
rro
sio
n R
ate(
mp
y)
Optical analysis of test coupon
Test coupon : carbon steel at 120 for 48hrs℃
Degradation apparatus
WEC-Italy, Rome, 201111/19
Test results : 0.1MW Test bed
Location: Boryung power Plant, Korea
Capacity: Flue gas 350 m3/hr
CO2 Recovery 2 Ton/day(0.1MW)
Start Up: OCT. 2010
Source Gas: CO2 14%, O2 5%, SO2 25ppm
Solvent: KoSol-series, MEA
0.1MW Test Bed
WEC-Italy, Rome, 201112/19
Test Schedule
~Jan, 23rd KoSol-3 campaign (1st,68days)
Jan, 23rd~28th washing/ solvent change
March, 1st ~ 21st MEA campaign (1st, 20 days)
March, 22rd ~24th washing/ solvent change
April,2nd ~ May,14th Long run operation(KoSol-3, 1,000 hours, 43 days)
Test & Analysis
DOE Key variable Analysis Optimal Condition
- Simulation
- Statistical analysis
Test results : 0.1MW Test bed
WEC-Italy, Rome, 201113/19
· CO2 capture ratio : 90.6% (average)
· Captured CO2 : 2 ton-CO2/day
· Regeneration energy : 3.0~3.2 GJ/ton-CO2
· No degradation during the long term test
Operation Time(hr)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
CO
2 C
aptu
re R
atio
(%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Cap
ture
d C
O 2(to
n/d
ay)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Ste
am C
on
sum
pti
on(k
g/h
r)
10
12
14
16
18
20
Conversion(%) CO2 Capture(TPD)
Steam Consumption(kg/hr)
Test results : 0.1MW Test bed/long-term test
KoSol-3 Long-term test results (1,000hrs: from April 2~ May 14, 2011)
CO2 Capture Ratio(%)
WEC-Italy, Rome, 201114/19
Test results : 0.1MW Test bed/corrosion
- Corrosion points : 8 points
- Corrosion probe: carbon steel P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-8
Co
rro
sio
n R
ate(
mp
y)
P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-6 P-7 P-8P-5
KoSol-3MEA
Corrosion Rate
Corrosion Probe point
- Stripper(P-4) is the most corrosive
point in the process
- Kosol-3 corrosion is 70% lower than
that of MEA in Test Bed
WEC-Italy, Rome, 201115/19
10MW Pilot Plant Construction
• Objectives : Demonstrate the performance of the KoSol solvent and the Process
• Treated gas rate : 35,000Nm3/hr (200 t-CO2/day)
• Source Gas : flue gas of coal fired boiler(CO2: 14%, O2: 5%, SO2: 25ppm)
• Basic Design was completed
• Detail Design :
~ Feb 2012• Plant Construction :
~ May 2012 ~ May 2013
0.1MW Test bed
Process Simulation
Basic Design
WEC-Italy, Rome, 201116/19
Location of 10MW Pilot Plant
10MW CO2 Capture Plant SiteBoryong Power Plant(#8)
Seoul
BoryongPower Plant
Boryong Power plant ( 8×500MW plants, Bituminous coal)
WEC-Italy, Rome, 201117/19
Conclusion & Future Works
Conclusion• Development of advanced amine solvent (KoSol-3) for CO2 capture
- Decreased regeneration energy
▶ BSU: 2,8 GJ/ton CO2, Test Bed : 3.0~3.2 GJ/ton CO2
- Less corrosive than MEA
- Less degradative than MEA• Construct 0.1MW Test Bed and 3,000hr trouble free operation
Future works• Process optimization (0.1MW)
- Appling absorber inter-cooling system and advanced reclaimer• 10MW Pilot plant construction by May 2013• New Generation Technologies
▶ Development of self-concentrated CO2 capture system for reducing
regeneration energy consumption
WEC-Italy, Rome, 201118/19
Ji-Hyun Lee
Senior Researcher, KEPCO Research Institute, South KoreaE: [email protected] / T: +82 42 865 5258
Thank you for your attention !