cupid alexander, housing program specialist, portland housing bureau, how we create housing...
TRANSCRIPT
Neighborhood Partnerships RE: ConferenceHow We Create Housing Opportunity: Local Government Action to Generate Housing Resources
Slide 1
Overview of Portland Affordable Housing Actions in the Last 18 Months
• Tripling the size of the city’s affordable housing tax exemption program
• A 50% increase to the amount of urban renewal funding dedicated to affordable housing
• Dedicating short-term rental tax revenue to affordable housing
• Renter protections that extend no cause eviction notice to 90 days and notice for increasing rent/housing cost by more than 5% set at 90 days
Slide 2
Overview of Portland Affordable Housing Actions in the Last 18 Months
• Creation and funding of a Joint Office of Homeless Services with Multnomah County
• Adoption of a construction excise tax
• Development of recommendations for a mandatory inclusionary housing program to be considered by City Council in December
• Referred an affordable housing bond to voters, which was passed on December 8
Slide 3
Closer Look at Select Portland Actions
• Increased Urban Renewal Funding
• Affordable Housing Bond Referral
• Construction Excise Tax for Affordable Housing
• Mandatory Inclusionary Housing
Slide 4
2015 Policy Review Findings
• PHAC Key Recommendations:•Minimum 50% set-aside in aggregate across URAs
•Retain current income target guidelines
• PDC Board Preliminary Key Recommendations:•Hold URA-by-URA discussion
•Any increased investment should be accompanied by broader funding strategy
•Consider financial sustainability of PDC
Slide 6
2015 Policy Review Recommendations
• Increase aggregate minimum TIF Set Aside for Affordable Housing from 30% to 45%
• Increase in aggregate minimum TIF Set Aside should apply to active URAs beginning July 1, 2015
• Calculation in the River District includes some combination of TIF debt proceeds and ownership interest in the Broadway Corridor/USPS acquisition equal to $20 million
• Retain existing income guidelines
Slide 7
2015 Policy Review RecommendationsUrban Renewal Area
Status Quo Policy Set Aside %
2006-2015Set Aside at 30%
2015-2025Set Aside at 45%
Downtown Waterfront 21% 19% No New Debt
Oregon Convention Center 26% 11% No New Debt
South Park Blocks 52% 52% No New Debt
Lents Town Center 30% 33% 42%
Gateway 30% 42% 33%
Interstate 30% 34% 70%
Central Eastside 18% 14% 32%
North Macadam 36% 40% 46%
River District 30% 41% 31%
Total 30% 32% 45%
Slide 8
2015 Policy Review Recommendations
Urban Renewal AreaStatus Quo Policy
Set Aside $Targeted 45%
Set Aside $Resulting 2015-2025
Set Aside $
Lents Town Center $31,637,259 +$7,500,000 $39,137,259
Gateway $10,644,013 +$2,000,000 $12,644,013
Interstate $63,653,046 +$32,000,000 $95,653,046
Central Eastside $9,840,270 +$0 $9,840,270
North Macadam $60,000,000 +$5,000,000 $65,000,000
River District $26,507,340 +$20,000,000 $46,507,340
Total $202,281,928 $66,500,000 $268,781,928
Slide 9
Impact of Recommendations
• Interstate Corridor, +$32 M• Funds to affordable housing will provide resources to support general urban renewal area
production targets as well as the N/NE Housing Investment Strategy and will not affect any project commitments in Interstate
• Lents Town Center, +$7.5 M• Funds to affordable housing will not affect the funding commitment to the Lents Action Plan
• Increase in funds for affordable housing could be offset by extending the life of the district by two years to allow it to achieve maximum indebtedness
• Gateway Regional Center, +$2 M• Funds to affordable housing will not affect any project commitments in Gateway
Slide 10
Impact of Recommendations
• River District, +$20 M• PHB will receive a combination of debt proceeds and ownership interest in the Broadway
Corridor/USPS acquisition equal to $20 million. If the acquisition has not been executed prior to June 30, 2020, the option of $20 million in TIF debt proceeds will be executed.
• Allocation of these funds will maintain project commitments in the River District and provides sufficient funding to deliver on the Old Town/Chinatown Action Plan
• North Macadam, +$5 M• Allocation of funds to affordable housing will not affect any commitments in North Macadam
• With full build out of Zidell Yards, leaves $20M+ available for South Portal
Slide 11
Bond Authorization
• $258.4 Million• $.4208 per $1,000 of assessed value
• Estimated $75 per single family home
• 20-year repayment term
• 5 - 7 year bond issuance
Slide 13
Impact of Bond
• 1,300 units of affordable housing (0-60% MFI)• 600 units at 0-30% MFI
• 50% of units family-sized (2&3 bedrooms)
• 2,900 Portlanders a year in bond-funded housing• 50,000 - 58,000 Portlanders over 60 years
Slide 14
Impact on Portfolio
• Current 0-60% MFI portfolio: ~ 11,634 units• Production pipeline: ~1,500 new units
• Impact of Bond• +1,300 units
• 11% increase to 0-60% MFI units
• 25% increase in 0-30% MFI units
Slide 15
Construction Excise Tax Recommendation
• Residential tax of 1% of permit valuation on new residential development
• Commercial tax of 1% of permit valuation on new commercial development
Slide 18
Construction Excise Tax Recommendation
• Residential Tax Revenue*:• 15% to State for homeownership
• 50% for inclusionary zoning incentives
• 35% for affordable housing at or below 60% MFI
• Commercial Tax Revenue*:• 100% for affordable housing at or below 60% MFI
Slide 19
*4% of revenue for administration
Construction Excise Tax Exemptions• Required State Exemptions:• Affordable Housing at or Below 80% MFI
• Public Improvements Under Public Contracting Code
• Schools, Hospitals, Worship, Agriculture, Non-Profit Care
• Additional Portland Exemptions:• Affordable For-sale Housing
• Accessory Dwelling Units for 2 years
• Improvements when value is less than $100,000
Slide 20
Annual Revenue – Historic Estimates
Slide 22
5 Year Average
Residential Revenue 5,404,087
15% for State 778,188
50% for IZ Incentives 2,593,962
35% for Affordable Housing Programs 1,815,773
Commercial Revenue 2,681,298
100% for Affordable Housing Programs 2,574,046
Total Revenue 8,085,385
Policy Framework• Citywide program, calibrating the inclusion rate and incentives by geography
• Set mandatory program at 80% AMI, and develop supplemental incentives to reach below 60% AMI
• Prioritize units on site over fee-in-lieu revenue or units off-site
Slide 24DRAFT DOCUMENT
Policy Framework Continued• Inclusionary housing requirement for all buildings with 20 or more units
• Inclusionary units maintain market comparable quality, size, bedroom composition, and unit distribution in the building
• Maintain affordable units for 99 years
Slide 25DRAFT DOCUMENT
Mixed Use Zones
Slide 27
Mandatory Inclusionary Requirement • 20% of Units at 80% Area Median Income
Incentives • Density Bonus• 10 Year Property Tax Exemption on Affordable Units• CET Exemption on Affordable Units• Density Bonus Units Exempt from Parking Requirements
Deeper Affordability Option • 10% of Units at 60% Area Median Income
Incentives • Density Bonus• 10 Year Property Tax Exemption on Affordable Units• CET Exemption on Affordable Units• Density Bonus Units Exempt from Parking Requirements• SDC Waivers on Affordable Units
Zones with Base FAR below 5.0
Slide 29
Mandatory Inclusionary Requirement • 20% of Units at 80% Area Median Income
Incentives • Density Bonus of 3.0 FAR• 10 Year Property Tax Exemption on Affordable Units• CET Exemption on Affordable Units
Deeper Affordability Option • 10% of Units at 60% Area Median Income
Incentives • Density Bonus of 3.0 FAR• 10 Year Property Tax Exemption on Affordable Units• CET Exemption on Affordable Units• SDC Waivers on Affordable Units
Zones with Base FAR above 5.0
Slide 30
Mandatory Inclusionary Requirement • 20% of Units at 80% Area Median Income
Incentives • Density Bonus of 3.0 FAR• 10 Year Property Tax Exemption on All Residential Units• CET Exemption on Affordable Units
Deeper Affordability Option • 10% of Units at 60% Area Median Income
Incentives • Density Bonus of 3.0 FAR• 10 Year Property Tax Exemption on All Residential Units• CET Exemption on Affordable Units• SDC Waivers on Affordable Units
Build Off Site OptionOption #1: Off-site Construction of New Units
Slide 31
• # of Affordable Units Required Off-Site• Either, 20% of the total units in sending site at 60% AMI
• Or, 10% of the total units in sending site at 30% AMI
• Comparable size, quality, and bedroom count as the units in sending site
• Sending site retains FAR bonus, no other incentives
• Receiving site affordable units receive CET exemption, and SDC waivers on units at and below 60% AMI
• Receiving site must fulfill its own inclusionary housing requirement
• Affordable units must be under construction, or have CO, prior to approval of use as off-site option
• Affordable units must be no more than 1/2 mile from sending site, or in an area with an equal or better opportunity mapping score
• Housing Bureau must approve off-site plan
• No supplemental city subsidy can support the off-site units themselves
Build Off Site OptionOption #2: Off-site Dedication of Existing Units
Slide 32
• # of Affordable Units Required Off-Site• Either, 25% of the total units in sending site at 60% AMI
• Or, 15% of the total units in sending site at 30% AMI
• Comparable size, quality, and bedroom count as the units in sending site
• Sending site retains FAR bonus, no other incentives
• Affordable units must be available prior to approval of use as off-site option
• Affordable units must be no more than 1/2 mile from sending site, or in an area with an equal or better opportunity mapping score
• Housing Bureau must approve off-site plan
• No supplemental city subsidy can support the off-site units themselves
Fee-in-Lieu Calibration
Slide 33
1. Calculation of Maximum Justifiable Fee-in-Lieua) Difference in the capitalized market value between 100% market rate building and a 20% at 80%
AMI building with units on site
b) Calculate on a $ per gross square foot of building
2. Calculation of Portland Fee-in-Lieu Recommendationa) Opting out of affordable units on site requires City to build units
b) Current city subsidy per affordable unit is $100,000
c) Impute the fee per gross square foot based on number of affordable units required
d) Compare with maximum justifiable fee-in-lieu to ensure no fees exceeds the cap
Fee-in-Lieu Option
Slide 34
Zone/FARRecommended Fee-in-Lieu per GSF Residential
Based on City Cost to Build Affordable Units
CM 1 at Base FAR $23.83 CM 1 with Bonus FAR $25.79
CM 2 at Base FAR $25.79 CM 2 with Bonus FAR $26.50
CM 3 at Base FAR $26.03 CM 3 with Bonus FAR $28.58
3.0/4.0 FAR $27.39 3.0/4.0 Base with Bonus FAR $28.57
5.0/6.0 FAR $28.57 5.0/6.0 Base with Bonus FAR $28.99
8.0 FAR $28.99 8.0 Base with Bonus FAR $29.81
9.0 FAR $29.81 9.0 Base with Bonus FAR $29.42
12.0 FAR $29.42 12.0 Base with Bonus FAR $29.85
15.0 FAR $27.39 15.0 Base with Bonus FAR $28.57