culinarian cookware case discussion_group 3

21
Culinarian Cookware Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion Group No. 3

Upload: prashant-bankar

Post on 01-Nov-2014

1.281 views

Category:

Documents


69 download

DESCRIPTION

cc

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion

Group No. 3

Page 2: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Q. 1. Describe consumer behavior in the cookware market. How is cookware bought? How is it sold? What are the implications for

Culinarian’s marketing strategy?

Page 3: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Consumer Behavior in Cookware Market

The Cookware Market• Witnessed attractive growth from 2002-06 ($3.36

billion market)• Cookware classified by: Price, Quality and Material• Manufacturers can be distinguished based on the

product portfolio they offered: Low-end/mid-level products or Premium Products

• Aluminum cookware formed a major chunk of the cookware sales followed by Stainless Steel and Copper, POI, Cast Iron

Page 4: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Consumer Behaviour in Cookware Market

The Buying Pattern• Consumers either purchased by the piece or as boxed set• The buying pattern was seasonal in nature with peaks

seen during May-July (Wedding Season) and November-December (Holiday Season)

• A huge chunk of cookware that was bought was gifted• Quality and Features ranked higher than price and brand

name when it came to buying cookware• Brand awareness played a vital role when consumers

went to purchase cookware

Page 5: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Consumer Behaviour in Cookware Market

The Selling Pattern• Cookware was sold in either of:

• Kitchen specialty stores (24%)• Department stores (29%)• Mass Merchandisers (32%)• Others: Local Specialty stores, Grocery Stores, Direct TV sales,

internet and catalogs (15%)• Manufactures divided on the basis of their product offerings• Premium manufacturers rarely launched price promotions but

offered regular gift promotions• Low/Mid level manufacturers introduced plenty of price promotions

especially during peak seasons

Page 6: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Consumer Behaviour in Cookware Market

The Premium Cookware Consumer• Consumers of premium cookware were now moving

towards colored designer offerings that matched their kitchen décor

• Consumer behaviour was also positively influenced by endorsements by celebrity chefs

• Majority of the consumers were from the households having income of more than $75,000

• Women naturally formed the biggest buyers of premium cookware

Page 7: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Consumer Behaviour in Cookware Market

Implications for Culinarian’s Marketing Strategy• Culinarian is a premium performance cookware manufacturer,

focused on advanced performance technology • CEO’s Strategic priorities:• 1) widen its distribution network, • 2) increase market share in premium cookware segment, • 3) preserve its prestigious image, and• 4) continue to capture revenue growth of at least 15%,

while preserving pre-tax earnings margins of 12%.

Page 8: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Consumer Behaviour in Cookware Market

Implications for Culinarian’s Marketing Strategy• Given the consumer behaviour and Culinarian’s strategic intent of being the

premium brand, it’s target group is largely the households with more than $75,000 annual income

• Due to its intent on maintaining a prestigious image, its distribution channel needed to have some kind of exclusivity

• Due to the advanced technology that it used, the sales force had to be trained enough to put forth the value proposition

• To maintain the brand image, it had to use the forms of media which reached its TG (Cookery shows, elite newspapers and magazines)

• Price promotions always was a tricky game given the premium nature of its offerings

• However, a fine balance was also expected so that neither retailers nor consumers felt left out

Page 9: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Q. 2. What are Culinarian’s strengths and weaknesses? Why has the company

been successful?

Page 10: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Strengths

Market Leader in Premium Segment

• With a 6.5% overall market share, Culinarian was the market leader in the premium segment

Strong Revenue Growth

• Company already on track to achieve a 21% y-o-y growth in 2006

Strong Brand Equity

• Culinarian enjoyed a strong brand awareness of providing unparalleled quality with highly advanced performance technology• Company was leader in metallurgy innovation and as the first manufacturer to provide the benefits of copper cookware with effortless cleaning and maintenance

Extremely Robust Sales Force

• Culinary provided comprehensive training programs to its retail clerks• Sales force included 8 experienced account managers who visited major accounts once every month, more than any other cookware company

Page 11: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Weaknesses

Retailers Demands

• Although, Culinarian enjoyed strong relationships with its retailers, most of the trade channels demanded price promotions which wasn’t handled well by the company

The Distribution Network

• Although the company’s aim was to increase its distribution network, it did not make concrete efforts to address this aim

Failed Price Promotions

• Culinarian’s price promotions so far remain debatable when we look at its market share

Flawed Advertising Expenditure

• Trade was hardly supported through its advertising expenses and celebrity chefs which are a major influencer while buying premium products remained untapped

Page 12: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Reasons for Success

Strong Brand Equity

• Culinarian enjoyed a strong brand awareness of providing unparalleled quality with highly advanced performance technology• Company was leader in metallurgy innovation and as the first manufacturer to provide the benefits of copper cookware with effortless cleaning and maintenance

Extremely Robust Sales Force

• Culinary provided comprehensive training programs to its retail clerks• Sales force included 8 experienced account managers who visited major accounts once every month, more than any other cookware company

Strong Retailer Relationships

• Culinarian’s distribution channels were limited giving it exclusivity which helped its premium brand image, moreover it was made available largely at high end stores• Company enjoyed strong relationships with the dealers and each of them carried all of its product lines, moreover the profit margin that Culinarian provided (52%) was unmatched by its competitors (48%)

Advertising and promotions

• 10% revenue spent on Advertising with focus only on the Target Group of high income audience• The gifting promotion every year also helped boost the sales of the targeted product

Page 13: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Q. 3. Was the 2004 promotion profitable? Calculate the profitability using Brown’s logic

and then calculate profitability using the consultant’s model. How would you calculate

profitability?

Page 14: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Calculation of ProfitabilityCategory Consultant’s view Victoria Brown’s view

Sales Forecast Forecasted sales for 2004

should have been 119504 units using the computer generated model

Forecasted sales for 2004 should have been 24% below the 2003 sales which would have been 59871

Variable Cost

Variable costs includes labor, raw materials, manufacturing overhead, 5% advertisement, 7% selling expenses

Variable costs must include only labor and raw materials which totaled 38.64

Cannibalization Loss

Products in DX1 line were cannibalized and loss was calculated to be $99,332 and Culinarian saved $39,540 in inventory costs

Cannibalization calculations are erroneous and so are unreliable

Page 15: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Calculation of Profitability

The consultant’s sales projection was based on 10 years forecast model, which seemed more reliable than a simple comparison of first two months sales by Brown.

The Variable cost should include only raw materials and labor. Advertising cost should be treated as a fixed cost. Hence, variable cost estimated by Brown (which is $38.64) is correct.

Regarding cannibalization of DX1, we cannot say that the decrease of sales in DX1 are not completely because of the promotions on CX1. Hence, we should not use these costs.

Page 16: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Calculation of Costs Consultant Victoria Brown Actual Estimate

No Promotion

20% Promotion

No Promotion

20% Promotion

No Promotion

20% Promotion

Units 119504 184987 59871 184987 119504 184987Price 72 62.4 72 62.4 72 62.4

Total Revenue 8604288 11543188.8 4310712 11543188.8 8604288 11543188.8Variable Cost 52.05 52.05 38.64 38.64 38.64 38.64

Total Variable Costs 6220183.2 9628573.35 2313415.44 7147897.68 4617634.56 7147897.68

Contribution Generated 2384104.8 1914615.45 1997296.56 4395291.12 3986653.44 4395291.12

Profit/Loss -469489.35 2397994.56 408637.68

Culinarian Calculations

Hence, 2004 promotion was profitable for Culinarian Cookware.

Page 17: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Pros and Cons of 2004 Promotion

Pro’s• 80% is from existing owners, which

meant that there were about 20% from new customers.

• 70% felt price was important, which meant that the pricing promotion stimulates purchase.

• 15% would consider upgrading to higher series for the next purchase.

• The trade should be happy by generating more profits

• Boost overall brand awareness• Helps Retailers preserve floor space• Advertising was through retailers

Cons’• The trade would always look for

promotion. • Limited advertisement may constrain the

scope of target audience. • Promotion was just before time of

historical peak seasons, if the program was during the peak seasons, it might be even more effective.

• Some retailers put the discount in their pocket.

• May Have negative brand effect on premium products – PROX1 and SX1

Page 18: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Q. 4. Should Culinarian run a 2007 price promotion? If so, what should be the specifics of such a promotion (e.g., product scope, discount rate, timing, communication)? If a price

promotion is not suitable, think about another type of sales promotion (e.g., manufacturer rebate program, gift with

purchase, sweepstakes, product placement, etc.) to recommend.

Page 19: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

2007 Promotion

o Limit price promotion to low end product lines (CX1, DX1) in order to preserve the premium image of the Brand

o Reduce Trade Margins from 52% to 48% only on fast moving product lines(SX1 and PROX1) where trade can be assured of volumes. Volume will compensate for their reduced margins

o Keep the promotions in the months just before the peak sales ( April, May, October, November)

o Communication should not only target high income audience but look at communicating to mid level income audience for low end product lines

Page 20: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Other Promotion Strategies

o Since 55% of the respondents buy/receive cookware as gift items, increase the point of sales to gift shops and online gifting portals

o Make low end product lines available in mass merchandise outlets since 32% purchase cookware from there

o Run volume discounts where a customer purchasing more than 5 pieces will get a discount. This will ensure capturing larger market share

o Associate with the cooking show to increase awareness about brand and influence the purchasing decision

o Conduct a contest where best recipe will wino Run a bundled promotional offer where in fast moving and slow moving

product lines can be clubbed togethero Offer rebates on high end product lines rather than discountso Have attractive in-store promotions and displays to influence buying

Page 21: Culinarian Cookware Case Discussion_Group 3

Culinarian Cookware

Group No. 3

o Prashant Bankar (A007)o Mahesh Kollipara (A033)o Meera Malekandathil (A035)o Bhagyashree Sathe (A048)o Vinodini C (B013)o Anurag Choudhary (B014)o Ninad Karandikar (B030)o Priyanka Garg (C019)