cricet: remodeling literacy learning

39
Remodeling Literacy Learning Darren Cambridge [email protected] KaiLonnie Dunsmore [email protected]

Upload: edcocp

Post on 02-Jul-2015

330 views

Category:

Education


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Series page with descriptions: http://connectededucators.org/cricet/

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Remodeling Literacy Learning

Darren Cambridge [email protected]

KaiLonnie [email protected]

Page 2: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning
Page 3: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Sustained improvement in literacy teaching and learning occurs when literacy is a shared responsibility, professional learning is rooted

in collaboration and inquiry and in organizational conditions that support

ongoing learning for everyone.

Who is NCLE and What Do We Believe?

Page 4: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Teacher Collaboration is

Key to Supporting & Reforming

Practice

Page 5: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

HEURISTICS for Designing & Evaluating Reform Models

Page 6: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

“Routine” collaboration is correlated with higher levels of trust and faster spread

of effective practices.

Page 7: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Limited Opportunities for Powerful Practices

11

Page 8: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning
Page 9: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

15

Page 10: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning
Page 11: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning
Page 12: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Creating Collaborative Culture

Page 13: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Maintaining an Inquiry Stance

Page 14: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Using Evidence Effectively

Page 15: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Shared Agreements

Page 16: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Supporting Collaboration Systemically

Page 17: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Asset Inventory

Results

What might these results tell us about this district’s team of literacy coaches?

What did you notice that surprises you?

How might these results be used to inform decisions or practices of this team?

2.41

2.58

3.05

2.13

2.68

3.08

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

Deprivatizing Practice

Enacting Shared Agreements

Maintaining Inquiry Stance

Using Evidence Effectively

Creating Collaborative Culture

Supporting Collaboration…

Overall Domain Averages

Page 18: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

2.27

3.00

3.00

2.64

2.73

2.45

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

Share successes & failures without judgment

Meetings are productive & purposeful

Members follow through on things

Feel responsible for working together

Challenge each other & engage in hardconversations

Share leadership

Average Ratings for Collaborative Culture

Page 19: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

3.18

3.00

2.91

3.36

2.64

3.18

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

Clear purpose focuses our work

Focus on core issues of student learning

Clear about intended student outcomes

Use a cycle of planning, acting, and reflecting

Routinely monitor our progress

Incorporate expertise and research evidence

Average Ratings for Inquiry Stance

Page 20: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning
Page 21: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Become a Center for Literacy Education

16853 usersTotal Groups 428

Page 22: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Learning Network

Formative Assessment Teams

C-3 Implementation Teams

Secondary ELL & Writing

Family/School Partnerships COPs

Page 23: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Practice Exchange

Page 24: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Focus on Organizational Conditions

Page 25: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Deprivatizing Practice

• Will this policy facilitate formal and informal peer observations that lead to improved practice?

• Does it make explicit how all key individuals share in the accountability for student literacy learning?

• How does it clarify responsibilities for collectively supporting and sharing the benefits from professional learning?

• Does it advance the collection and comfortable sharing of evidence of progress towards goals among all participants?

• How does it facilitate collaborative learning and the sharing of knowledge across educator roles, schools, and grade levels?

Page 26: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Enacting Shared Agreements

• Does the kind of decision making and action supported through the policy focus on improving student literacy learning?

• How does it help all key individuals contribute to and reach agreements about what quality literacy instruction looks like and about essential student literacy learning outcomes?

• How does it support processes for reaching agreements about how to assess essential outcomes?

• Does it provide a method for evaluating whether daily work and decision making are driven by the shared agreements reached by educators in the process?

• How does the policy advance literacy learning across content areas? How does it tap the knowledge of educators with knowledge of essential literacy practices in each content area?

Page 27: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Creating a Collaborative Culture

• Does the policy facilitate the sharing of successes and failures without judgment by those implementing change?

• Is time for collaboration provided to those who are implementing changes? How does the policy support using time for collaboration productively and with purpose?

• How does the policy facilitate the sharing of leadership and ownership of key process and outcomes among those operating at different levels?

• How does it support group members as they engage in honest, hard conversations about obstacles?

Page 28: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Maintaining an Inquiry Stance

• Does the policy promote collaborative work that has clear goals and a purpose?

• Does collaborative work supported by the policy focus on core issues of student literacy learning in the context where it will occur?

• How does the policy support a cycle of plan/act/reflect to solve problems of practice/implementation?

• Does the policy promote commitments among group members to act between meetings and report back to the group?

• How does it encourage seeking appropriate “outside” expertise when needed?

Page 29: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Using Evidence Effectively

• Is the kind of collaboration supported through the policy grounded in on-going analysis of evidence of student learning?

• Does it promote the use of multiple sources of data?

• How does it support participants in building their knowledge of how to use data effectively?

• How does it promote analysis and discussion of student work with others on a routine, frequent basis?

• Does it provide for assessment of actions taken in terms of their impact on student learning over time?

Page 30: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Supporting Collaboration Systemically

• How does the policy provide for dedicated time for professional collaboration within the work week?

• Does it provide tools and training to educators to help them collaborate more productively?

• How does it position leaders to support and promote collaborative work?

• Through the policy, what do leaders do to ensure access to timely data sources?

• How does the policy encourage individuals it aims to support try new ideas and experiment through their professional practice?

Page 31: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

NCLE Lessons Learned

We know how to improve the conditions for literacy learning.

But we need to tell this story in many venues to many audiences.

Every stakeholder has a role to play in remodeling literacy learning

Page 32: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

A Network of Organizations

Page 33: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

In the COMMUNITY to leverage expertise and work across organizations

In & Across SCHOOLs to build organizational conditions for continuous improvement

In EDUCATORS to evaluate & employ effective literacy instructional practices through collaborative inquiry

New Project: LIREC, A U.S. Department of Education Innovative Approaches to Literacy Grant

Building Capacity….

Page 34: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

LIREC (IAL) Grant Partners

• First Book

• Institute for Educational Leadership

• National Council of Teachers of English

• Rural School & Community Trust

• Westat

• LEA Partners

– AZ – Blackwater Community School & Star Charter Schools

– IL – ROE 3 + elementary schools in Mulberry Grove and South Central

– NC – Roanoke River Valley Education Consortium + elem. schools (3) in Northampton & Warren

– VT – Vermont Rural Partnership & 5 districts/schools

– WV – RESA 7 + elementary schools in Barbour & Gilmer County

Page 35: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Participants

Page 36: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning
Page 37: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning
Page 38: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

National Innovation Network

Community Literacy Plan

Engaging FamiliesPlaced Based Learning

Effective Preschool Instruction

Page 39: CriCET: Remodeling Literacy Learning

Drivers of Educational Change

49

Vision Accountability Resources Incentives

Expertise Ownership Professionalism

Shared Agreements

Collective Capacity