Creating A Winning Team2012 Summer Institute Administrator Sessions

Going for the gold…

• Harvard Model for Evidence-Based Adult Education

• Indiana Adult Education Core Values• IDWD Policies• Performance Based Funding• Measuring Outcomes

Harvard ModelEvidence Based Model for Adult Education

• Program model developed by John P. Cummings and Lisa Soricone (Harvard Graduate School of Education)

• Describes steps to establish an adult education system based on data and evidence

Harvard Model

Program Quality Support

Entrance Into a Program

Participating in a Program

Re-engagement

Indiana and the Harvard Model

How Indiana’s Core Values Fit In

Program Quality Support

Leveraging resources to increase capacity

Seamless referral process between Adult Education and WorkOne

Managed intake, orientation and enrollment

Deliver quality adult education and workforce services

How Indiana’s Core Values Fit In

Entrance

Student recruitment support

Managed intake, orientation and enrollment

Accelerate learning

How Indiana’s Core Values Fit In

Participation

Deliver quality adult education and workforce services

Accelerate learning

Student retention support

How Indiana’s Core Values Fit In

Re-engagementLearners are prepared to transition to postsecondary,

occupational training, or employment

Increase WorkINdiana enrollments

Expand WorkINdiana availability and selection

Student completion support

Build business partnerships

What can you do to help your program go for the gold?

DWD Impact…

PoliciesPolicies

Program Quality Support

DWD Adult Ed PoliciesProgram Quality Support Policies• 2011-5 (Program Standard)• 2011-6 (Funding)• 2011-8 (Data Collection and

Reporting)• 2011-9 (GED Testing)• 2011-10 (Professional

Qualifications and Development)

• 2011-11 (Program Monitoring and Improvement)

Participation/Entrance Policies• 2011-12* (Distance

Education)• 2011-13* (Assessment)

* OVAE required policies

Policy Scavenger Hunt

The Power to Maximize Results

Performance Based Funding

What we know…

• 27 states currently use a PBF system for state funding and 30 use it for federal funding

• PBF results in:– Improved data collection and management– Innovations in services– Stronger wrap-around services and retention techniques

• Improves accountability and adoption of improved service models

Reimbursement Schedule

Performance Funding and Allocation

Variable Description Weight

% of Statewide Enrollment

•Average of 2010-2011 & 2011-2012 (7/1/11-12/31/11 x 2) from NRS Table 4•Includes hardcopy 10-11 submissions•Includes ASC students

40%

% UI Claimants* •2011 UI Claimants without a credential•DWD Claimant Pool Analysis

10%

%Reimbursements Earned**

•Reimbursements earned less enrollments ($60) and EL Civics

50%

How will we measure success?

NRS Performance Targets

Measure2012-2013 INDIANA Performance Targets

ABE Beginning Literacy (0-1.9) 36%ABE Beginning Education (2-3.9) 43%ABE Intermediate Low (4-5.9) 46%ABE Intermediate High (6-8.9) 45%ASE Low (9-10.9) 61%ESL Beginning Literacy 48%ESL Low Beginning 45%ESL High Beginning 50%ESL Intermediate Low 43%ESL Intermediate High 43%ESL Advanced 39%Entered Employment 65%Retained Employment 25%GED or HS Diploma 78%Entered Postsecondary Education/Other Training

70%

Resources

• For a full copy of the Harvard Model:– http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/resear

ch/op_comings4.pdf

• Adult Education Program Administration – www.in.gov/dwd/adultedadmin

• Adult Education for Students/Public– www.in.gov/dwd/adulted.htm