copyright by lan li 2020
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright
by
Lan Li
2020
The Thesis Committee for Lan Li
Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Thesis:
Future Information Professionals’ Perspectives on the Impact of AI on
the Future of Their Profession
APPROVED BY
SUPERVISING COMMITTEE:
Kenneth R. Fleischmann, Supervisor
Amelia Acker
Future Information Professionals’ Perspectives on the Impact of AI on
the Future of Their Profession
by
Lan Li
Thesis
Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of
The University of Texas at Austin
in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements
for the Degree of
Master of Science in Information Studies
The University of Texas at Austin
August 2020
Dedication
I would like to thank my parents and husband for their loving support during my
time in the master’s program.
v
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge and give my sincerest thanks to Dr. Ken
Fleischmann, not only for his support in completing this work, but for his guidance
throughout my time at UT. This work would not be where it is without his tireless
support along every step of the way. Thanks also to Dr. Amelia Acker for providing
helpful and timely feedback throughout this process. I would also like to thank all of the
master’s students within the information studies program who volunteered their time and
energy to participate in my study. Through working on this thesis, I’ve gained a deep
respect for my peers who have made the choice to become librarians and archivists.
vi
Abstract
Future Information Professionals’ Perspectives on the Impact of AI on
the Future of Their Profession
Lan Li, M.S. Info. Stds
The University of Texas at Austin, 2020
Supervisor: Kenneth R. Fleischmann
The field of library and information science (LIS) has always shaped and been
shaped by the changing tides of technology. Given that recent developments in AI appear
to be the next technological wave that may bring major disruption for the future of
information professionals, how are students in ALA-accredited master’s programs reacting
to these changes? This paper reports findings from interviews with students pursuing
studies in librarianship and archival studies about their educational experiences with
artificial intelligence (AI) and their expectations about how AI will impact their future
careers as librarians and archivists. Key themes that emerge from this analysis include
structural and professional changes in libraries and archives, the loss of human elements in
libraries and archives, and ethical challenges of AI in libraries and archives.
Recommendations based on these findings include ways to adapt LIS education to better
prepare students, such as developing courses that combine the technical aspects of how to
leverage AI that is content and context relevant to libraries and archives, to ensure that
vii
librarians and archivists can have active roles in leveraging AI to better accomplish their
goals of serving patrons’ information needs and wants and preserving the past.
viii
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE FUTURE OF WORK ..................................................3
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LIBRARIES AND ARCHIVES ............................................4
METHODS.............................................................................................................................7
Research Questions ..............................................................................................................7
Recruitment ..........................................................................................................................8
Data Collection ....................................................................................................................8
Data Analysis .......................................................................................................................9
FINDINGS..............................................................................................................................9
Structural and Professional Changes in Libraries and Archives ........................................11
AI in Libraries and Archives ....................................................................................12
Changing Definition of Libraries and Archives .......................................................13
Demand for New Skills.............................................................................................15
Challenges in Career and Educational Pursuit ..........................................................15
Displacement of Jobs ................................................................................................17
Ethical Challenges ....................................................................................................19
The Loss of the Human Elements in Libraries and Archives ............................................20
Loss of Understanding ..............................................................................................20
Loss of Empathy .......................................................................................................20
Loss of Agency .........................................................................................................21
ix
Professional Identity and Ethics.........................................................................................22
DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................25
Technical Training for Librarians and Archivists ..............................................................25
Career implications for future information professionals ..................................................26
The Need for Librarians and Archivists.............................................................................28
LIMITATIONS .....................................................................................................................30
FUTURE WORK ..................................................................................................................31
CONCLUSION .....................................................................................................................31
APPENDIX A – THE SCREENER SURVEY ......................................................................34
APPENDIX B – THE INTERVIEW INSTRUMENT ..................................................................40
REFERENCES .................................................................................................................45
1
INTRODUCTION
From clay tablets (Wellisch, 1981) to Android tablets (Derr & Tolppanen, 2015),
libraries have always shaped and been shaped by technological progress (Fleischmann,
2010). Given that recent developments in AI appear to be the next technological wave that
will bring major disruption for the future of the information profession (Slota et al., 2020),
how are information school (iSchool) students reacting to these changes? The goal of this
study is to examine how students training in iSchools perceive the future of AI and the
impact that it will have on their careers and professions, with a focus on students pursuing
studies in librarianship and archives (Dillon, 2012). This case study of future librarians and
archivists can also provide insights into how students in professional programs in general
are coping with AI-induced stress in navigating both the career and the educational fronts
(Corrales et al., 2018; Glauser, 2017). The choices made by these future information
professionals, in the midst of AI development and implementation in information
institutions, will have great impact on the long-term health and longevity of the fields of
which they ultimately hope to become a part.
Librarians’ and archivists’ primary goals are to serve the information needs and
wants of their communities, (Brown, 2004) preserving and providing access to evidence of
the past (Gracy, 1987). As information technology reshape the ways in which we search,
consume, and preserve information, what do library and archives students see as the
implications of AI on their fields? How are these students coping with the potential impacts
that AI may have on their careers and professions? With upskilling and re-education as the
oft cited solutions to the widely hyped potential for job displacement due to AI (Alic,
2018), this study seeks to understand how AI impacts people’s behavior in relation to their
educational development. In addition, by understanding future information professionals’
2
perspectives on AI, iSchool master’s programs1 and ALA-accredited programs in general,
can better adjust and reinvent themselves to provide the best possible education for their
students.
Aside from Woods and Evans (2018) and Cox et al. (2019), there are few studies
examining how libraries and archives will cope with the potential changes that AI might
bring. Those studies identified perceptions of changes within academic libraries’ core
functions such as search and resource discovery as well as possible displacement and/or
creation of new roles. There is a particular need for studies that explore the topic from the
perspective of students within ALA-accredited master’s programs, who will make up the
future of the library and archives workforce. Students are a crucial population because they
are actively engaged in the process of deciding how they intend to shape their future
careers. By making the commitment to earn an ALA-accredited master’s degree, students
are making a commitment to move into fields that are rapidly changing. Whether or not
their graduate education can meet the continual challenges that libraries and archives will
face is crucial for the long-term health of the profession.
1 Not all iSchools are ALA accredited, and not all ALA accredited master’s programs are iSchools.
3
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE FUTURE OF WORK
AI can be understood as “a branch of computer science that studies the properties
of intelligence by synthesizing intelligence” (Stone et al., 2016, p. 13). As the advancement
of AI continues to progress at an accelerated pace, and AI systems are capable of a wider
range of human tasks in fields ranging from healthcare (Yu et al., 2018) to law (Surden,
2019), AI’s potential impact on the future of work becomes an ever more salient concern
among both techno-optimists and pessimists (Wilson, 2017). Within the information field,
where the process of digitization has increasingly made library and archival resources
accessible via the web, similar concerns exist about how far and how much information
technology will encroach into the roles of librarians and archivists. As technology
continues to integrate into the information profession, educators within the information
field are tasks with waves of challenges related to student preparation. How can educators
prepare students to engage in fields where the necessary skills are shifting, and the
boundary between what can be done by librarians and archivists versus technology is
blurring.
General anxieties that surround the continual availability of work amidst the
automatization of work is nothing new. During the industrial revolution, many artisans
feared that machines that took over factories will make them obsolete. But throughout the
industrial revolution, more jobs were added to the job market through the mechanization
process. Similar questions arise in the present moment as artificial intelligence becomes an
ever more pervasive part of modern life. As such, the debate about how artificial
intelligence will once again reshape professions is of wide-ranging interest (Arntz et al.,
2016; Brougham & Haar, 2018; Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014). Regardless of what the
eventual outcome of the future will look like, the increasing integration between human
4
work and AI will reshape the nature of work across many professions (Latham & Humberd,
2018). How we choose to educate and build a work environment that integrates both
humans and technology will be of crucial importance to future informational professionals’
ability to delivery those services to patrons.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LIBRARIES AND ARCHIVES
Related research in technological developments within libraries suggest that some
of the most prominent uses of AI within the library context arise in the form of AI-based
chatbot systems for reference services. Williams (2019) noted that despite the rich
resources available within subscription-based databases at academic libraries, the ease of
use factor of commercial tools such as the Google Scholar search engine has upended the
more traditional catalog search methods done within library supported tools. Furthermore,
our everyday interactions with consumer AI virtual assistants such as Alexa, Siri, and
Cortana are reshaping our behaviors around how search is being conducted on a daily basis
(Golden & Fleischmann, 2018; Guy, 2016; Yi et al., 2020). While reference librarians are
doing their best in trying to convince others of the criticality of expert knowledge of how
to conduct information searches, including nuanced but sophisticated approaches to
constructing Boolean queries, the habit of quick searches have changed the expectations of
users, and thus to adapt, libraries are also increasingly introducing more convenient means
of search, such as the single search box (Lown, Sierra, & Boyer, 2013) and virtual agents
(McNeal & Newyear, 2013), into the library search and resource discovery process.
Beyond search, libraries are increasingly experimenting with inclusion of technologies
such as VR (Massis, 2015) and 3D printing (Michele Moorefield-Lang, 2014). The new
technologies introduced via makerspaces have reinvigorated the services provided by the
5
library (Willett, 2016). Frey (2018) drew up a host of new developments that could be
coming to libraries in the future decade, including AI. Indeed, libraries provide the ideal
testing site for evaluating the user experience of new information technologies.
While recent adoption of technology within libraries has increased patron
engagement, acceptance of technology wasn’t always embraced by the profession with
open arms. For librarians, facing new changes to the profession is nothing new, especially
challenges that arise due to the development of new technology. When the internet first
arrived, there was a flurry of anxiety that came as users moved towards search through the
use of search engines and finding information from online encyclopedias such as
Wikipedia. Melchionda (2007) described a subset of concerns librarians had towards
technology, which included a sense of menace, technostress, and fear of change. Young
(1996) discussed such anxieties expressed by librarians back in the 1990s. In the 1990s,
there was already concern that librarians might be replaced by what Young termed
“cyberspace navigators”. For some librarians, new technology represents a potential for
loss of control over within their domain of expertise. But throughout the years, libraries
have nevertheless embraced each and every new wave brought on by technological
changes. What will this new technological wave, propelled by AI, look like for the future
generation of librarians?
Within archives, internet and other major technological developments have also
significantly increased the challenges faced by archivists. With the growing veracity,
volume, and velocity of born-digital records, the material-based archival profession is also
shifting towards the digital realm. As the gatekeepers of records, similar to libraries, the
sheer volume of information and the creation of it, has dramatically shifted the archival
landscape. Through the integration of machine learning techniques, video, text, and audio-
based formats all have the potential to increase the discoverability and accessibility of
6
archival items (Padilla, 2019). Computer vision techniques has the potential to improve
textual description of video footages. For text-based materials, optical character
recognition (OCR) systems are capable of digitizing at an increasing speed and accuracy,
even automating processes such as metadata tagging. Furthermore, text materials could
benefit from summarization techniques enabled by machine learning. Text-to-Speech
systems (TTS) systems could enable creations of audio formats from text-based sources.
On the other hand, audio material can similarly benefit from Speech-to-Text (STT). With
improvements in machine translation capabilities, more works can be made available in an
increasing number of languages. Crowdsourced metadata creation, also known as
folksonomy (Suster, 2006), is expanding the archival process to a broader set of audiences.
Instead of a top down method of assigning metadata to records, a bottom up tagging system
is emerging through usage of online communities such as Delicious, Flickr, Technorati and
more. As discussed by Stevenson (2008), the shift in technology and user behavior is
similarly raising questions and challenges for those in the archival profession.
A major tension around the discussion of AI has been around the impact it may
have on jobs across a wide range of fields, including libraries and archives. In a study
examining the impact computerization will have on a wide range of occupations (Frey &
Osborne, 2017), librarians were calculated to have a 64% probability of being
computerized, and archivists have a 76% probability. Out of the 702 occupations Frey and
Osborne examined, librarians and archivists ranked 360th and 415th, respectively (the 702nd
occupation, predicted as most likely to be completely computerized, is telemarketers; the
least likely to be computerized, rated 1st, are recreational therapists). According to the
Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) (2019), with average job growth rate of 5%, BLS
estimates that from 2018 to 2028, there would be a 6% (approximately average) job
7
increase for librarians, and a 9% (faster than average) job increase for archivists, curators,
and museum workers.
The State of America’s Library report (2019) identified advances in AI and the
development of intelligent libraries as future trends for the field. However, Wood and
Evans (2018) found that librarians do not exhibit much awareness of, or concern about AI,
noting that there was little interest in engaging with the topic either through workshops or
related research from the field. Furthermore, work by Cox, Pinfield, and Rutter (2019)
show that on the topic of AI, leaders within the library field do not share a common view
on its potential impact for the profession. Of those who believe that AI will have an impact
on academic libraries, AI is predicted to have the most impact on search and discovery,
scholarly communication, and teaching and learning. This study seeks to augment current
discussion around the impact of AI on the information profession by listening to the
students who will become future librarians and archivists.
METHODS
Research Questions
This study explores three research questions:
RQ1: What are future librarians’ and archivists’ perspectives on AI?
RQ2: How do these perceptions shape future career decisions for graduates who are in the
library and archives fields?
RQ3: How do these perceptions shape decisions of specialization for graduates who are in
the library and archives fields?
Further, using semi-structured interviews, this study seeks to uncover who these
students are, what motivated them to pursue information studies in the first place, what
8
their perceptions of artificial intelligence are, and how they foresee their future library and
archives careers.
Recruitment
This study reports findings from semi-structured interviews with eight current
graduate students in an ALA accredited 2-year master’s program. The students interviewed
were at various stages of their master’s program. Half of them were in their first year and
the other half were in their second year. Their ages ranged from 24 to 35, 87.5% were
female, and 87.5% were white. Half indicated archives as their area of study, a quarter
indicated librarianship, and a quarter indicated both archives and librarianship.
Participating students had to have taken librarianship and archival courses during their time
at the program. Students voluntarily joined the study through recruitment solicitation
through program listservs and in-class recruitment calls.
Data Collection
Between October 2019 and February 2020, eight individual interviews were
conducted with students enrolled in an ALA-accredited master’s program pursuing studies
in librarianship and/or archives (See Appendix A for the screener survey and Appendix B
for the interview questions). Interviews ranged from 30-45 minutes in length; 75% were
conducted in-person and 25% were conducted remotely. Interviews were transcribed and
shared with the students post interview. Because this research involved human subjects, it
underwent and received approval through The University of Texas at Austin’s institutional
review board (IRB) review process and human subject research training was completed
prior to the interviews.
9
The interview instrument consisted of three parts. First, an exploration of the
backgrounds of the students interviewed. Second, questions aimed at understanding
students’ knowledge and their perceptions of artificial intelligence in general, as well as
how it relates to their intended careers in libraries and archives. The third part of the
interview explored students’ educational pursuits and career aspirations.
Data Analysis
Google Cloud Speech-To-Text API generated the initial raw transcripts. Each
transcript was then manually proofread for accuracy. All audio files were deleted from.
Transcripts were shared with each interviewee. Proofread versions of the interview were
then used in the subsequent data analysis process. The data analysis follows the thematic
analysis process described by Braun and Clarke (2006). The analysis process used NVivo
12 qualitative analysis software. During the initial code generation phase, 67 unique codes
were generated. During a second pass of the code generation, 179 unique codes were
generated. From these 179 codes, a cohesive set of themes emerged from students’
responses.
FINDINGS
Through the course of the interviews, on the topic of AI, students reported some
uncertainty about what AI is and how it is defined. As one student put it:
“I feel like technology is just becoming more prevalent, but I don’t
know how much of it is specifically AI.”
10
Students expressed self-consciousness when discussing the topic of AI due to
concerns about their lack of expertise on the topic. Despite the ambiguity around what
constitutes AI, when asked about their opinions regarding AI, particularly in relation to its
use within society, the students interviewed held a generally pessimistic perspective. One
student described the development of AI and its impact on society as follows:
“It terrifies me. It totally terrifies me. I don’t want to live in this world,
but I recognize that it's not black and white, it's not all good and bad. I
think I actively, for the longest time, tried to avoid learning about those
things because I didn't like the way that it was changing my thinking.”
Although the student described a strong negative opinion toward the development of AI,
it’s not without a nuanced consideration of why they feel this way. The student continued:
“...I think there are good sides to having all this digitized information,
better being able to link between archival repositories, and digitizing
all this stuff that you wouldn't be able to have access to or wouldn’t be
able to go visit...but at the same time I worry about what it's doing to
people's critical thinking skills, so much of the way people think it's just
simple answers or snippets of information and not the sort of this
relationship between them and the ability to think critically and to
question the system that you're using to instead of just blindly following
it and not looking at how it’s structured outside, politically, and how
the corporations are affecting our lives and our livelihoods and also
just the opaqueness of it, not knowing how it works and what's being
taken from you in terms of like privacy, and your time, so I do, it really
it does scare me a lot.”
In describing the reasons for holding a negative opinion towards AI, the student examined
the question through a humanistic lens; specifically, looking at issues related to mental
health, critical thinking skills, and concerns for privacy. Here, another student provided
their opinion in contrast:
“I generally feel better about it than a lot of people at this school
definitely, in this program, that's at least my perception. I think it just
kind of seems like a lot of people having a knee-jerk reaction to
associate it with evil and there's definitely a lot of bad stuff with that,
11
like algorithmic bias, that is talked about and those are really
important things to talk about, but yeah my opinion is that I think a lot
of, as long as people like people from the iSchool keep working in these
fields and being part of the development ecosystem, it will end up being
overall positive...”
It is interesting to note that this student had taken computer science courses before, while
many other interviewees had not. Perceiving that their point of view might differ from
those of their peers, this student acknowledged that concerns regarding AI’s negative
impacts are important to consider in moving its future development along a positive
trajectory.
Students were asked about their perceptions of the short-term and long-term
impacts of AI on libraries and archives. In response, students generally described the future
impacts based upon their prior experiences volunteering and working in libraries and
archival settings. The impacts of AI described by these students include:
• Structural and professional changes in libraries and archives
• The loss of the human element in libraries and archives
Structural and Professional Changes in Libraries and Archives
Many students perceived that AI will be incorporated into libraries and archives
due to funding concerns. Students voiced concern that cost-cutting incentives might drive
upper management to find AI-based solutions for running libraries and archives, effectively
using the technology as a cost-cutting tool to replace human workers. In contrast, others
argued that only the most well-funded libraries will receive benefits that come from
integrating AI into their institutions, smaller institutions will not be able to afford such
implementations, thus widening the gap between the select few institutions and the rest:
12
“...any technologies that advance the use of AI in archival settings are
only going to apply to the top 10 of our partner institutions, and maybe
in like 20-25 years, it will trickle down to the rest of them if they still
exist.”
This student believed that the distribution of AI technology will be unevenly applied across
archival institutions, and that only those with already robust funding support will be able
to benefit from the technology.
AI IN LIBRARIES AND ARCHIVES
A wide spectrum of technologies was discussed by various students when thinking
about how AI could come into play within libraries and archives. The discussions were not
always strictly related to AI, but included technologies such as automation systems, VR
systems, 3D printing machines, etc. Within libraries, students mentioned automated book
retrieval systems, self-checkout carrels, online reference services, online recommendation
systems as few concrete examples of where AI could be, or is already, integrated into
libraries. Within the archives setting, students mentioned tools such as optical character
recognition (OCR) system and AI-based translation services. Each of these services has the
potential to improve the efficiency of certain tasks or provide patrons with more ways to
engage with libraries and archives, outside of the physical settings. For example, several
students mentioned that online chat systems currently staffed by library assistants could
potentially be powered by AI chatbots. Within the archival context, student discussions
were tied mainly around OCR technology, with a few individuals citing other technologies
such as machine translations tools. As one student discussed:
“I do think there is a role for AI, especially when it comes to OCR.
...software isn’t perfect yet, but AI is increasing the capabilities of
translation as well as optical character recognition software. So,
documents and text and images which are becoming digitized and
accessed via an archival portal for a specific archive or a library, these
13
new AI-based machine learning systems do enhance the capability of
scholars to access and read text in different languages.”
Despite the fact that this student held a more pessimistic view on AI overall, they
nevertheless recognized the potential benefits of AI.
CHANGING DEFINITION OF LIBRARIES AND ARCHIVES
As technology reshapes the landscape of libraries and archives, students began to
ask, what is a library? What is an archive? As technologies such as automated book
retrieval systems, self-checkout kiosks, and online reference service begin to enter
libraries, the physical space within the library also changes. Within public libraries,
students noted the increasing presence of computer labs and makerspaces being
incorporated into the library. In academic libraries, traditional library stacks are making
way for collaboration zones for students to work together. One student described the
changing functionality within the library in these terms:
“I think that (common study area) is probably already really the
number one use of libraries, and I don't think, again I guess in about
the coming generations, I don't think that, I don't think that new college
students would mind now going into a library without there not being
any librarian. They might hardly notice.”
In plain terms, the student noted a potential future of libraries to exist without any librarians
due to a combination of technological changes as well as behavioral changes from the
upcoming generation of college students using the academic library, observing that the
current generation of college students might already have a different notion of what a
library is.
As the physical makeup of the library changes, the professional roles of librarians
and archivists change as well. In archives, students similarly raised the question of what it
14
means to be an archivist, if and when the underlying set of tasks associated with the
profession is being reshaped by technology itself:
“I think if things do change a lot, and people are using AI systems and
there might be some kind of, a sense of instability maybe in the field, if
people are like, what it means to be an archivist has really changed,
what it means for me, and the identity shift, but that’s not necessarily a
bad thing, but it’s just a different thing...”
As the student sketched out the potential professional impacts AI may have for archives,
they described the potential instability that it might bring to the profession itself. As a
student, the identity shift may not be as difficult of a hurdle to overcome, ‘it’s a different
thing’, which may stand in contrast to responses from veterans of the profession.
For roles within libraries that is potentially an area of growth within the library, the
nature of what those librarians do are also shifting. An example of this, as one student
mentioned, is related to the emerging field of digital humanities. Increasingly, researchers
seek to utilize the potential of AI to advance scholarship in the humanities. The emerging
field of digital humanities is one of the areas in which the library is experiencing an increase
in demand as researchers and faculties are expressing interest in bootstrapping their
research with the added capabilities that data science and machine learning holds. The
nature of the library research services is shifting as a result, research service positions are
morphing into technology liaison positions. As one student described:
“one thing that I’ve thought about is things like research services that
have kind of already been transferred to technological positions, those
things, just kind of the nature of them, seems pretty fluid right now and
what you have to know.”
Echoing the archival student before, this student similarly spoke of the fluidity that exist
within the profession as it undergoes changes, especially within emerging areas and roles
at the library.
15
DEMAND FOR NEW SKILLS
As library and archival institutions continue to adapt new technologies to meet the
changing needs of patrons today, students are further faced with the challenge of keeping
abreast of these new and rapidly evolving set of skills and demands. As data science
seminars, digital humanities workshops, peer production workshops, 3-D printing,
augmented reality, and makerspaces become a part of the library experience, one student
described the challenges in this way:
“I think the whole thing with technology librarianship and
technological expertise is definitely something that in the long-term, is
going to be abstracted out in a lot of ways. I think that like 3D printing
is another example of that, where right now having 3D printing
knowledge is definitely a marketable skill but who knows where that
technology will go and how easy it will be to set up and use the 3D
printer.”
This student sees the nature of technology as ever simplifying. As librarians, if the goal of
keeping abreast is to chase the latest wave of technology, the chase would be difficult as
the technology cycle is constantly churning, new knowledge become stale quickly. While
there are a great number of immediate benefits to being open to learning new technology,
this student wonders where this would lead in the long run?
CHALLENGES IN CAREER AND EDUCATIONAL PURSUIT
Within libraries and archives, students are aware of the need to have more technical
skill sets while seeking out career opportunities within libraries and archives. Although
students appreciate that technology focused courses have helped them gain hard skills,
many still express a desire to take more traditional library and archives courses. Students
were asked whether or not AI shaped how they have chosen to pursue their current
16
education. Some students did not see any necessity in choosing more technology-centered
courses:
“Not really. I think it's fun to think about for me, but I don't consider it
a huge part of what I want my curriculum to be.”
However, there are many who were stepping outside of their comfort zone, looking to gain
more hard skills in technology:
“I’ve realized that it’s foolish to just try to ignore this obviously and I
think it's changed the path that I'm going to take because I feel like I
need to learn more about this stuff, more about AI, and I think it's
important because it's like okay if I have these issues with it, shouldn't I
understand it because I think that's where a lot of fear comes from, it’s
the unknown you know.”
While the desire to delve deeper into understanding how technology works is present
among many students, this student noted the challenges that comes with learning technical
skills:
“I hope to feel competent in a job, I think I feel like the imposter stuff
pretty heavy and the fact that even now I am just like some of this
information stuff can be good for me, feels like so late in life it's hard to
jump in because I feel like technology stuff is like math, it’s like
cumulative, so it’s hard to just like let me jump in at this point because
there’s so much assume knowledge that you need to know”
Acknowledging that learning about technology could be beneficial, given this student’s
background in the humanities, the idea of becoming a technology-savvy librarian is fraught
with potential challenges which might not readily suit the core strengths of what the student
brings.
Other adaptive career strategies were more in line with trends students see archives
and libraries going. Some students made choices about where to refine their focus in the
17
field, and which areas within the field would hold more promises in the future. As one
library student described:
“I think about being a reference librarian, and I would think, well I
probably could still be reference librarian right now if I personally
could get a job doing that, there’re definitely still reference librarians’
positions. And I would take one of those without worrying about being
fired immediately or laid off, I guess. But it is, I think it's something
that I would just not look into as much because I know there are less
positions now than there were 5 years ago, probably?”
Other students preferred to focus on people-facing roles within libraries because
community programming requires people to run them. As one student put it:
“I know the thing that I would consider is going into a more person-
based situation, doing more programming, or teen services and stuff
and more education-based, which is another thing that is definitely
relevant in the short to medium-term I think.”
For those who, perhaps acknowledge that technical skills are not their strong suit, hopes to
find aspects of the library profession that may require less technical know-how and focus
mainly on their areas of strength.
DISPLACEMENT OF JOBS
As the introduction of increasingly advanced technology continues to reshape the
skills needed within the profession, what will happen to existing roles in libraries and
archives? Many students described the possibility of existing roles being potentially
displaced by the inclusion of technology. For example, the reference librarianship role
(American Library Association, 2020), a role that historically, is about serving library
patrons through answering questions related to patron’s informational needs could be
impacted by AI. On the potential displacement of reference librarian roles, one student
said:
18
“...short term for libraries I think definitely, a big one, is reference and
the way that artificial intelligence in well both in like searching the
ways in which search engines and voice assistants are getting so much
better and then also the way in which chat assistant are getting so
much better and will continue to get so much better. So, I think that's a
big area where for reference services which has traditionally been a
pretty big part of the library, that stuff continued to take up a lot of
service hours. AI can be a more viable tool for good reference service
and I think the effect of that obviously is that libraries are not going to
hire as many reference people because the AI will be really good at
answering people's questions and even questions that are more and
more qualitative...”
This student weighs the potential benefits of AI in terms of its ability to provide more
flexibility, convenience, and scalable service to patrons.
Similarly, students discussed the incorporation of automated book retrieval systems
within the library, as well as self-checkout carrells in the library. The common theme
echoed across these automation systems that are already making their way into libraries is
that they are potentially displacing entry-level positions within the library, such as library
assistants who normally manage the library front-desk and library pages who retrieve and
reshelf books, as well as possibly taking away opportunities for individuals within the
community to volunteer at the library. As one student said:
“I wasn’t sure if that would be considered AI, but I’ve seen those kinds
of things before and it’s really cool because all the stacks are
contained into one integrated system and all of the space is left open
and accessible to the public. Yeah it does keep everything contained
and then you know exactly where everything is, or the robot knows. You
set it up but then after that the space allocation is maintained by the
robot which is pretty cool. So, I guess yeah it does do good for the
higher-ups at the library because that system maintains itself, but it
does eliminate the need for a library page or volunteers.”
All of the students, in some form or another, discussed the potential displacement
of librarianship and/or archival positions due to AI. Due to the intrinsically sensitive nature
19
of this topic, the potential for displacing library jobs makes it difficult to fully embrace the
technologies such as AI. The number of job opening are declining due to the decrease in
budget and potential increase in reliance on technology.
ETHICAL CHALLENGES
When considering the ethical challenges that AI may pose within libraries and
archives, most students touched on issues such as patron privacy, censorship, algorithmic
bias, and misinformation, as one student said:
“I understand that there are positive benefits to AI in terms of
computing and processing, but I think there is a very high societal cost
for AI and this also comes from my own values and understanding of AI
but I think like many things in society, artificial intelligence and
computing kind of heavily impacts specific communities, racially and
class-based. At least for me AI is viewed, is also being connected with
kind of the surveillance structures that we see on the internet and in
society generally speaking. So, I think I really have a high connotation
between AI and surveillance.”
Students raised questions about how AI suppliers would control patron data,
including potentially sensitive demographic information:
“For patrons, it could be demographic information which would be of
interest to corporations, probably the ones supplying AI...if it's a school
library, it’s all student records, which is sensitive.”
Interestingly, one student discussed the potential displacement of jobs through an ethical
lens:
“... [AI] would make for fewer entry level jobs in the field, And that
could be somewhat unethical and that now there is maybe no jobs that
you can get without a college degree which then you know that's
adding expense, that’s giving people less of a chance to have early life
experience.”
20
The Loss of the Human Elements in Libraries and Archives
LOSS OF UNDERSTANDING
One of the commonly raised concerns among students regarding integration of AI
into libraries and archives was the loss of the “human touch”. Within the archival context,
the loss of the human touch arises from archivists losing a visceral sense of connection
with the materials with which they are working. As AI technique automate metadata
descriptive processing, the need to directly engage with the physical material decreases.
As one student notes some of its implications:
“...in my own experience, when I did analog processing, when you're
going through all the papers, you're touching them and you’re seeing
it, you do kind of feel like a connection with them that if you're not, just
happens with digital materials anyways, but if you're not yourself
looking at all the materials, you might not have as much of a
connection with them and I think also if you're not really looking at
everything, it might be more difficult with description, to describe the
materials to the best of your ability and description is used by
researchers so it's really important part and if you know you're kind of
relying on a program to tell you what the collection is about there's
things that computer program might miss that like a human reader
would pick up on.”
This student drew out implications that could arise from not directly engaging with the
archival material, such as the inability to provide accurate metadata descriptions of the
materials.
LOSS OF EMPATHY
Another student described the experience of archiving works related to handling of
documents shared by individuals who have gone through traumatic experiences. The
student discussed what it means to take care of that material as an archivist, highlighting
21
the human decision-making process, in particular, the role that empathy plays in the work
of an archivist:
“...when you were like describing [documents] you want to be using
sensitive language and not saying things that could be hurtful to the
people who are the subjects of those interviews because they're sharing
really personal and often traumatic experiences, and they’re on the
internet for people to see. So, when you're describing it, or if you're
using metadata to tag it, you want to be using terminology that is the
most maybe politically correct or sensitive and always keep in mind
that these are real people are who are in these videos. These are real
people who created these records and try to be sensitive to them.”
In highlighting the human element of empathy shown towards the material an archivist is
tasked to care for, the student discussed the sensitivity that is needed to know how to not
only accurately describe materials, but also respectfully describe them.
Within the library context, particularly within public libraries, where the population
served is more diverse than academic libraries, students noted patrons, particularly older
patrons, visit the library for the social connections that they have established there. By
incorporating more technical and automated systems and removing the presence of people,
patron’s experience at the library will be very different as opportunities for making
intangible human connections would be diminished. As one student put it:
“I think if we just have these automated things, we lose the personal
interaction that’s in libraries and the connection that is built with
knowing the people in your community and what they need.”
LOSS OF AGENCY
Archival students also noted that the value of the archival material is a human level
decision. Knowing what is important to keep for future generations, understanding its
importance, its context, who will be affected by it, all of that goes into making decisions
about archival collections. The collection is of value to future generations, and it is a matter
22
of human decision making as to what should be preserved and who might be affected by
it. As one archives student noted:
“I think the greatest loss would be if technology, instead of being
integrated into the archival profession, is seen as a better replacement.
Particularly for people who don't understand either the technology or
what archivist do on a day-to-day basis. If nothing else the choice
making has to come down to human.”
Reference librarianship is one of the commonly noted roles within a library that
could be affected by the inclusion of AI and automation. The motivation behind
recommendation provided by an algorithm is not the same as the motivation of librarians
in assisting their patrons. As one student noted:
“With libraries, I mean I still would do that job because I feel like it's
really people based. It’s helping people and you can't replicate that,
being face-to-face with a person and feeling that connection and that
emotional connection. You can do so much with AI you know, but you
can’t teach a computer to love.”
Whether in the library context or the archival context, the human touch that students
often spoke of is a question of value. It is the agency to decide to help and assist someone.
The agency to take care of materials that others have entrusted to them. The decisions of
those who use the library and those who it serves, those who entrust their personal material,
those who view it, and those who visit it. The vast number of decisions that come, in various
forms, day in and day out, that would be lost, if much is handed over to AI. The issue of
value leads into the third theme, the ethical challenges of AI in libraries and archives.
Professional Identity and Ethics
Although the shifting landscape of libraries and archives causes students to grapple
with many challenging questions, in general, the potential impact of AI did not sway the
students away from entering the archives and librarian profession. These students’ ethical
23
commitments to their careers often outweigh practical considerations. As one student put
it:
“I've never thought that money or job availability was one of my
criteria for picking a path. It's [AI] not really one of the top five
concerns that comes up when I think about.”
Students expressed reasons for why they chose to pursue careers in libraries and
archives. One student cited that the chance to discover new information through working
in the archives was what drew them to the field:
“I am the kind of person who would love to be working in a room full
of dusty old stuff that I can help people access and help preserve and
look at while I'm in the process of doing that and see fascinating old
newspaper articles.”
Another student was drawn to archives because it provides them a chance to work hands-
on:
“the type of work [archives] appealed to me; to work with these
materials where you would have to research them but also sort of have
this hands-on element with really unique materials”
Yet another archives student noted that the desire to understand how everyday documents
left by people fit into the broader historical context within which they lived was the reason
for their interest in the field. For those who have acquired foreign language fluency,
working in the archival setting allows them to continue using that skill set while supporting
ongoing scholarly research. For librarianship students, many were drawn to the social
aspects of working within the library environment, as well as the ability to teach and engage
with students, particularly within the academic library setting. One student commented:
“So I guess my interest in librarianship was truly kind of spurred by
the hands-on work I was doing one-on-one with students, helping them
to identify resources, cultivate their skills and informational literacy,
and really just work one-on-one with a community or group of students
24
or graduate students or faculty members to further their own
scholarship.”
Across both library and archives students, a common theme that drew them to the
fields is the ability to help others, be it individuals within their community, helping students
begin engagement in the research process, or helping scholars to continue to discover
materials for research. As one librarian student described the work as this:
“I really think that the point is that libraries are spaces for everyone
and also especially people who don't have the privileges of having like
a community spaces of their own or a place to go when it’s cold
outside.”
Despite drawbacks such as lower salary, students still chose to pursue the field:
“I thought that I would really like working in libraries as a career
regardless of the salary gap that might exist. Yeah so that was what
inspired me to apply.”
Within the set of reasons for entering the fields, lying underneath is a strong set of
commonly shared values that these students hold, values that match the ones upheld by the
profession itself. Archives students understood the importance of being entrusted with
materials that others have placed in their possession. There is a deep sense of professional
responsibility to care for the documents shared with them. Archival students empathized
with what it meant for an individual to share their documents and make it publicly available
for scholars, therefore, they showed a sense of respect towards the individual who made
this contribution. As one archival student put it:
“You are giving somebody access to your stuff and that’s a big... And
you know, there's also communities of people who have historically
been mistreated by historians, by archives, by scholars, and to put trust
in you and give you their records for safekeeping, I think you own them
a very high level of respect.”
25
For library students, the sense of service towards patrons is the most important aspect of
the profession. One library student noted:
“If we are moving towards a time where everybody wants everything to
be automated then I think that libraries are there to serve their patrons.
They are not there to be a stake in what a library is supposed to be.
They are there to serve the community and the people who use them.
So, I think libraries have a lot to gain, doing exactly that, serving,
giving people what they want.”
Thus, these students were clearly thoughtful about the implications of AI in their
professions and careers, the danger of the loss of the human touch, and the ethical
implications of AI in libraries and archives.
DISCUSSION
Technical Training for Librarians and Archivists
There is a common desire among library and archives students to learn more about
digital systems, AI, machine learning, programming, data science, etc. A study by Maceli
et al. (2018) found a similar trend toward technical topics. However, some of the students
expressed trepidation about taking these courses. While the topic of AI is discussed in
various courses, including library and archives courses, it is typically discussed at a high
level. If students choose to take a technical course, it is so technically focused that it loses
relevance for library and archives students. One proposal is to develop AI courses
specifically looking at how AI is, will be, and should be applied within the context of
libraries and archives. This way, students would have a deeper grasp of how these systems
are currently implemented within libraries, what kind of trade off exists when they make
decisions about which systems to adopt, which would work best in the interest of the
patrons, and perhaps discover areas and other technical aspects about which they would
26
hope to continue learning. This type of course could thus incorporate highly technical
knowledge but apply it within a relevant and comfortable context, libraries and archives.
Currently, the discussion around technology is an antagonistic one, in relation to libraries
and archives. But it is exactly during this time that these students must gain a better
understanding of how technology is changing their profession. As future decision makers
within these institutions, more than ever, they need this knowledge in order to make sound
decisions, rather than simplistically seeing it either as a peril or as a panacea. As library
and archival educators, we hold a responsibility to provide meaningful educational
experiences that allow students to learn technical skills including but not limited to the
ability to evaluate open source and commercial software, the ability to document workflow
that involves digital platforms, and the ability to evaluate the usability of these technical
solutions (Padilla, 2019).
Career implications for future information professionals
It is unsurprising that the topic of job displacement arises from discussions about
the potential integration of AI into libraries and archives, especially for these students, who
are actively pursuing their studies to become future librarians and archivists. Choosing
these career paths is a highly personal decision. It is a decision that is rooted in human
values (Fleischmann, 2014). Within the context of librarianship and archivists, the core
value lies in service, service to assist others’ information needs in the present as well as
into the future. While machines may be able to complete a specific task that is done by a
librarian or an archivist, such as chatbot for reference and automated metadata description
for cataloging, the machine, and likely the individuals who wrote the program for this
system, do not necessarily embody the values of the fields. Certainly, a job involves a
variety of tasks, but it is much more than just that set of tasks, there are larger values that
27
guide individual decisions to enter a field and how they perform the tasks and more broadly
enact their professional responsibilities. The values that these individuals bring to the
workplace guide not only the decision to pursue a profession, but also how to carry out
one’s work. These human values cannot simply be supplanted by a machine designed to
complete specific tasks without a broader orientation toward why or how those tasks need
to be completed. The values that are embedded within the design of technology itself
further advances some subset of values over others. In deciding on how to incorporate
technology into these fields, professionals within the field has to evaluate the technology
beyond the list of features provided.
For archivists, students discuss the potential impact AI might have on more
traditional roles within the archives, such as that of catalogers, those who source and create
records for analog materials. For librarianship students, reference librarianship was cited
by many students as one strand of the library profession that seems to be going away due
to the inclusion of AI and automation. Current AI systems are capable of answering
questions more efficiently than humans, as evidenced by Watson’s defeat of Ken Jennings
and Brad Rutter at Jeopardy (Markoff, 2011). However, it is important to note that when
an individual asks a question, the machine simply runs through a set of algorithms, but
when a reference librarian answers the question, the motivation is to help and support
another being in finding the answer to their question. This human exchange and experience
are deeper than simply the transaction of asking the question and returning an answer. In
the human context, as the patron receives an answer, they feel a sense of recognition, the
receipt of help, and for the giver, the reference librarian, they get to exercise the agency to
help someone. For both, it is an exchange of care and value, on top of simply the exchange
of question and answer. That seems to be what many of the students speak about when
mentioning the loss of the human touch. A job provides nourishment for our sense of self
28
and our place in the world. AI is currently not capable of having this sense, and the potential
future displacement of future librarians and archivists’ risks robbing humans of this sense
that they are part of society and that they can direct their values towards a career that would
allow them to exercise those values.
The Need for Librarians and Archivists
As of the writing of this thesis, within the past several months, COVID-19 has
brought unprecedented changes. As every aspect of society adjusts to manage the new
norms due to the virus. Libraries, like many other institutions, are also forced to make rapid
changes to accommodate new and emerging needs. While eight months ago, when
interviews for this study just started, the students interviewed were voicing their thoughts
regarding the future of libraries, many discussed the uncertainties regarding the place of
libraries in a highly digitally connected society. Due to COVID-19, these questions are
starting to see glimmers of answers as libraries all over the country make readjustments to
accommodate social distancing and public health and safety measures. Indeed, many
libraries now lack the physical presence of librarians, and libraries themselves have become
e-Libraries. On the other hand, for archives and museums, where physical exhibitions and
interactions are placed at the fore front, they are struggling to provide similar experiences
online.
The pandemic has also revealed truths in the fragile information environment we
currently live in. With misinformation about the virus spreading rapidly via social media,
more than ever, society is grappling with an information crisis (Xie et al., In Press) or
infodemic (Zarocostas, 2020) of massive proportion. Libraries continue to be a trusted
source for accessing valuable information about how to stay safe (Jaeger & Fleischmann,
2007). Besides offering trusted information, libraries continue to be a crucial source of
29
support in its service offerings. Harris (2020) reported that libraries across the country are
revamping services to continue assisting patrons in whatever way possible, these are
especially true of public libraries; a prominent example of this comes from the Los Angeles
Public Library (Barton, 2020). Book clubs and other programs have moved to Zoom to
help connect patrons who are sheltering-in-place. Libraries are increasingly moving other
activities online such as tutoring, reading sessions, classes, to support parents who are
joggling multiple responsibilities at home. Job search webinars hosted by libraries have
drawn large crowds as libraries seek ways to support the millions who are currently out of
a job. Patrons are increasingly accessing e-books through apps such as Libby, but for those
who still prefer the physical book, some libraries have adopted new services such as
curbside pickup. Despite lockdown orders when the building is closed, public libraries
continue to provide Wi-Fi for patrons, even if just within the parking lot. As students have
pointed out, libraries are community spaces for gathering and just to meet people, despite
the lack of physical presence, librarians are still actively making house calls to older
patrons to check in on how they are.
For archivists, the pandemic has accelerated efforts to capture and document as
wide a range of voices as possible, the diversity of experiences from individuals of every
walk of life, experiences that resulted during these unprecedented times. As Dixon (2020)
detailed, archivists from all across the country are accepting documents to capture and the
moment, and to process them using various techniques, including crowdsourcing. Archival
projects such as Harvard’s COVID-19 Community Archiving Project (Harvard University
Achives, 2020), Arizona State’s A Journal of the Plague Year (2020), and many more are
springing up around public and academic institutions, in order to document that moment
(Levien & Schumer, 2020). In this moment, archivists are leaning into the use of
technology, such as social media, to tap into the immense breadth of document types that
30
we now leave behind, digital as well as analog (Acker & Kriesberg, 2020). All of this is
cumulating in a richness of archival material to which prior generations of historians had
never accessed (Parry, 2020).
Finally, these challenges underscore the importance of the physical presence, which
many students raised during the interviews. As Marx (2020), president of the New York
Public Library, noted in an op-ed piece in the New York Times, the pandemic has reminded
all of us how essential human interaction really is, and libraries provide a crucial source
for continual interactions within the community that cannot be discounted. As these trying
times have shown, week after week, that libraries are crucial cornerstones within any
community. And librarians, as well as archivists, play a key role in supporting the
community as a whole in overcoming trials and challenges.
LIMITATIONS
There are several limitations to the study. First, the study involved a relatively small
number of students drawn from a single program, limiting the ability to generalize the
findings of this study. Second, the students were interviewed at a single point in their
master’s study. This implies that some are still in the exploratory stages of refining which
areas of librarianship and/or archives they are interested in pursuing, lacking hands-on
experience in the fields, while those further along in the program have more exposure to
the work that they hope to eventually do once they graduate. Finally, since this was a
voluntary study, and required a significant time commitment to participate in an interview,
there is the potential for self-selection bias, as is common for interrogative social science
research that follows the principle of informed consent.
31
FUTURE WORK
To address the limitation of the small number of students within a single program,
it would be valuable to replicate this study with additional ALA-accredited master’s
programs, thus increasing the number and diversity of students. To address the single-
point-in-time aspect, it would be valuable to conduct a longitudinal study, to follow
students in ALA-accredited master’s programs from the point when they decide to pursue
their degree program to various stages within the program to follow-up interviews after the
student graduates and is out in the fields. Finally, to address the issue of self-selection, as
well as to even further expand the number and diversity of students, it would be useful to
develop a survey to attempt to explore the generalizability of the findings of this study.
Researcher in this area should continue to explore the more nuanced ways in which
librarians and archivists will interact with AI technology within their fields while
safeguarding patron privacy and confidentiality. Furthermore, it would be worthwhile to
understand how new practices within the fields, as a result of incorporating AI technology,
shifts the educational landscape for future informational professionals.
CONCLUSION
Students showed a basic understanding of what artificial intelligence is and how it
works. Even though many acknowledged that they have limited understandings of what AI
is, all of the students were acutely aware of the growing presence of AI-based technology
in our modern lives, as well as towards the commonly held promises of what AI could
bring to our lives. Students expressed some positive perceptions of the promise of AI, but
also voiced concern about what AI will bring. Anxiety while discussing the implications
of AI on their intended profession was a common but not universal occurrence.
32
In contrast with studies of professionals within the library field (Wood & Evans,
2018) where librarians felt that AI will not have much impact on them, students in this
study, all students within an ALA accredited program saw that the technologically induced
changes through AI are already here, and continual changes are to be expected. Also, in a
departure from results of studies of professionals within the fields of librarianship, many
of the students interviewed showed an interest in stretching themselves to better understand
how technology such as AI actually work such that it will help inform them later in their
careers when they need to make decisions regarding which technology to adopt and reject.
Despite the challenges that students believe may come as more technology makes
its way into libraries and archives, students continue to make the decision to pursue the
fields of librarianship and archives; this is based largely on non-monetary reasons. For most
of the students, the path towards librarianship and archives aligns naturally with their
interests in history, arts, and other humanities fields from which they came from.
Furthermore, the work within these fields, which focuses heavily on service for a broad
and diverse set of individuals, aligns with the set of values they themselves hold. Because
of these internal values and professional values, students are more keenly aware of the
social and ethical issues that lie at the intersection between the benefits of technology and
its drawbacks. A clear illustration of this is in the area of privacy. Whether it be close
contact with archival material, and the development of a deep appreciation of its value,
archive students intuitively understand the importance of patron privacy as individuals’
information can be found in archival collections that extends beyond the present. This is a
departure from technologists who often work with voluminous data, where the idea of user
privacy is theoretically important, but less salient. The students interviewed, and many
more who will join the fields in the future, will become decision makers of tomorrow within
these memory institutions.
33
While the library and archive fields are changing, the students interviewed were
willing to embrace the opportunity to learn more about the technology, while at the same
time, as suggested by Shaw (2019), withholding critical examination regarding the kind of
impact it will have towards the patrons and the institutions they will find themselves
serving in the future. As Young (1996) and Arlitsch et al. (2017) conclude, librarians must
lean into better understanding emerging technology to secure a future for the profession.
As one student put it:
“I think when your first reaction to technology is to hate it without
trying it first, then you’ve already lost.”
34
APPENDIX A – THE SCREENER SURVEY
Start of Block: Consent form
1-Page Summary Future Information Professionals’ Perspectives on the Impact of AI on
the Future of Their Profession
Important information about this research study
You are invited to be part of a research study on future information professionals’
perspective on AI and the impact of AI on the future of their profession.
Things you should know. The purpose of the study is to examine how students pursuing
studies in librarianship and archival studies perceive the future of artificial intelligence
and automation and the impact that it will have on their careers and professions. To
participate, you must be at least 18 years or older, be able to communicate in English, be
currently enrolled as a student at UT School of Information, and be currently taking,
have previously taken, or be planning to take courses in librarianship and/or archival
studies. If you choose to participate, you will be asked to participate in a one-to-one
interview with one of the researchers. The interview questions will help us to understand
how you perceive how artificial intelligence and automation will impact your future
profession. This interview will take approximately one hour and will be audio-recorded.
The risks involved in participating in this study are not greater than in everyday life.
You will receive no direct benefit from participating in this study; however, this study
will help us understand how future information professionals perceive the impact of
artificial intelligence and automation will be on their chosen profession. Developing this
understanding will provide insights towards how information schools can better adjust
their program to provide and support the best possible education for their students.
Participating in this research study is voluntary. You do not have to participate, and you
can end your participation at any time.
Q1 Are you currently enrolled as a student at UT School of Information?
o Yes (1)
o No (2)
Skip To: End of Survey If Are you currently enrolled as a student at UT School of Information? = No
35
Q2 Are you currently taking, have previously taken, or planning to take courses in
librarianship and/or archival studies?
o Yes (1)
o No (2)
Skip To: End of Survey If Are you currently taking, have previously taken, or planning to take courses in
librarianship and... = No
SQ3 Would you be willing to participate in an in-person or remote interview?
o Yes, I agree to participate in an in-person interview (1)
o No, I do not agree to participate in an in-person interview (2)
Skip To: End of Survey If Would you be willing to participate in an in-person interview? = No, I do not
agree to participate in an in-person interview
End of Block: Consent form
Start of Block: Scheduling
SQ4 To schedule for the in-person interview, please visit this whenisgood link and select
all possible time slots. If you prefer the remote interview option, please provide times
slots that would be convenient for you below:
________________________________________________________________
SQ5 Please enter your name in the text box below:
________________________________________________________________
36
SQ6 Please enter your email address in the box below:
________________________________________________________________
End of Block: Scheduling
Start of Block: Survey Questions - Demographic
SQ7 What is your current age, in years?
________________________________________________________________
SQ8 What is your gender?
o Female (1)
o Male (2)
o Other (3) ________________________________________________
37
SQ9 I identify my ethnicity as:
▢ American Indian or Alaska Native (1)
▢ Asian or Asian American (2)
▢ Black or African American (3)
▢ Caucasian (4)
▢ Hispanic or Latino (5)
▢ Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (6)
▢ Other (7) ________________________________________________
▢ Prefer not to answer (8)
SQ10 During what year did you join the MSIS program?
▼ 2010 (1) ... 2019 (10)
SQ11 During which semester did you join the MSIS program?
▼ Fall (1) ... Spring (2)
End of Block: Survey Questions - Demographic
Start of Block: Survey Question - Education
38
SQ12 What is your area of study at the iSchool?
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
SQ13 What is your educational background (please list degrees, institutions, years)?
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
SQ14 If you are currently pursuing, or planning to pursue, any other advance degrees(s)
besides the MSIS, please list them:
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
39
SQ15 Please list all of your work experience, including prior, current paid, unpaid work:
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
End of Block: Survey Question - Education
40
APPENDIX B – THE INTERVIEW INSTRUMENT
Thank you very much for volunteering to participate in this study. The goal of this
study is to enhance our understanding of how future information professionals perceive
artificial intelligence and automation and the impact that it will have on their careers and
professions. This interview should take approximately one hour and is broken into two
parts. The first part explores your background and professional goals. In the second part,
we will ask questions about your views on the future of artificial intelligence and
automation. Based on your survey responses, we note that you have given us permission
to audio-record this interview. Is any of this information incorrect, or do you have any
questions at this point?
Interviewee Background
1. We saw in your survey response that you are currently in your [SEMESTER] at the
iSchool with concentration(s) in [this track/those tracks]. Could you please tell us more
about what made you decide to pursue [this track/those tracks]?
2. What kind of position will you seek after completing the MSIS program?
Impact of AI on the future of librarianship and archival profession
We begin with a broad discussion on artificial intelligence, where artificial intelligence
is broadly defined as machine learning systems for processing images, text and language,
sounds and music, etc. While artificial intelligence holds many promises, it also has the
potential for disruption, across multiple sectors, and multiple professions, from law to
41
healthcare. I will ask several questions regarding your perspectives on artificial
intelligence, and its potential implications for the profession you intend to pursue.
3. In your MSIS education so far, did you touch on the topic of AI and automation?
a. If so, could you please describe the course and how it was discussed?
b. If not, have you learned about AI and automation in another context?
4. How do you feel about the development of AI and automation in our society?
5. What short-term (1-5 years) impacts do you anticipate AI and automation will have on
your intended profession?
a. Can you please provide examples of what the short-term impact will look like
for your intended profession?
6. [Optional] What long-term (10+ years) impacts do you anticipate AI and automation
will have on your intended profession?
a. Can you please provide examples of what the long-term impact will look like
for your intended profession?
7. What do you think would be gained (and/or lost) if AI and automation are integrated
into your intended profession?
42
a. Can you please provide example(s) of what the gain(s) will look like for your
intended profession?
8. [Optional] What do you think would be lost if your intended profession is displaced by
AI and automation?
a. Can you please provide example(s) of what the loss will look like for your
intended profession?
9. What kinds of ethical challenges do you think AI and automation will present for your
intended profession?
a. Can you illustrate with example(s) of an ethical challenge that AI and
automation will pose for your intended profession?
10. Has the potential impact of AI and automation played a role in the way you approach
your educational (and/or professional) pursuits? If so, how?
11. [Optional] Has the potential impact of AI and automation played a role in the way you
approach choosing a future profession? If so, how?
12. Given the potential impact of AI and automation, how will you manage the potential
changes that AI and automation may bring in your career ahead?
43
a. Can you please provide example(s) of ways you would manage future career
changes?
Education Background
13. We saw in your survey response that your educational background includes
[DEGREES] in [FIELDS]. What motivated you to pursue study in [that field/those
fields]?
14. [Skip if not indicated in the survey] We saw in your survey response that you have
worked [YEARS] in [JOBS] prior to entering the MSIS program. Could you tell us
more about what kind of work these jobs entailed?
15. [Optional] How did you first learn about the field of information studies?
16. [Optional] What made you decide to enroll in an information studies program?
17. [Optional] How did you learn about the Texas iSchool, and why did you decide to
enroll in the Texas iSchool’s MSIS program?
18. How do you anticipate the arc of your career unfolding, and what do you hope to
accomplish in your career?
19. [Skip if not indicated in the survey] We saw in your survey response that you are also
working on/or planning to obtain [DEGREES] in [FIELDS] besides the MSIS degree.
44
Could you please tell us more about what motivated you to pursue [that degree/those
degrees]?
20. Is there anything else you would like to tell me, or anything else that I should have
asked?
45
REFERENCES
1. Acker, A., & Kriesberg, A. (2020). Social media data archives in an API-driven
world. Archival Science. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-
019-09325-9.pdf
2. Alic, J. A. (2018). What We Mean When We Talk about Workforce Skills. Issues
in Science and Technology, 34(3), 30-36.
3. American Library Association. (2019). The state of America’s libraries 2019: A
report from the American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/news/state-
americas-libraries-report-2019
4. American Library Association. (2020). Reference librarian.
http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/libcareers/jobs/reference
5. Arlitsch, K., & Newell, B. (2017). Thriving in the age of accelerations: A brief look
at the societal effects of artificial intelligence and the opportunities for libraries.
Journal of Library Administration, 57, 789-798.
6. Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in
OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment, and
Migration Working Papers, No. 189, OECD Publishing, Paris.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
7. Barton, C. (2020). Q&A: What do people ask a librarian in a pandemic? L.A.
library’s InfoNow has the answer. Los Angeles Times.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/books/story/2020-04-10/los-angeles-
library-info-now-coronavirus
8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative
research in psychology, 3, 77-101.
46
9. Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2018). Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence,
Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future
workplace. Journal of Management and Organization, 24, 239–257.
10. Brown, A. (2004). Reference services for children: Information needs and wants in
the public library. The Australian Library Journal, 53, 261-274.
11. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress,
and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: Norton & Company.
12. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2019, December 16).
Occupational Outlook Handbook: Librarians. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-
training-and-library/librarians.htm
13. Corrales, M., Fenwick, M., & Forgó, N. (2018). Robotics, AI and the future of law.
Singapore: Springer.
14. Cox, A., Pinfield, S., & Rutter, S. (2019). The intelligent library: Thought leaders’
views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. Library
High Tech, 37, 418-435.
15. Derr, J., & Tolppanen, B. P. (2015). Tablets: A survey of circulation policies at
academic libraries. Journal of Access Services, 12, 21-30.
16. Dillon, A. (2012). What it means to be an iSchool. Journal of Education for Library
and Information Science, 267-273.
17. Dixon, J. A. (2020). Documenting the pandemic. Library Journal, 145(6), 16.
18. Fleischmann, K. R. (2010). The public library in the life of the Internet: How the
core values of librarianship can shape human-centered computing. In J. C. Bertot,
P. T. Jaeger, & C. McClure (Eds.), Public libraries and the internet: Roles,
perspectives, and implications (pp. 91-102). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries
Unlimited.
47
19. Fleischmann, K. R. (2014). Information and human values. San Rafael, CA:
Morgan & Claypool.
20. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible
are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114,
254-280.
21. Frey, T. (2018). Future libraries: Activities for staying relevant. Information
Outlook, 22(3), 4-7.
22. Glauser, W. (2017). Artificial intelligence, automation and the future of nursing.
The Canadian Nurse, 113(3), 24-26.
23. Golden, K. E., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2018). Digital assistants and human values.
Proceedings of the 81st Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science
& Technology.
24. Gracy II, D. B. (1987). Is there a future in the use of archives? Archivaria, 24, 3-9.
25. Guy, I. (2016). Searching by talking: Analysis of voice queries on mobile web
search. Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research
and Development in Information Retrieval, 35–44.
26. Harris, E. (2020). Libraries strive to stay ‘community living rooms’ as they reopen.
The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/11/books/coronavirus-
library-reopening.html
27. Harvard University Archives. (2020). COVID-19 Community Archiving Project.
https://covid19.archives.harvard.edu
28. Jaeger, P. T., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2007). Public libraries, values, trust, and e-
government. Information Technology and Libraries, 26(4), 35-43.
29. Journal of the Plague Year, A. (2020). Share your story. https://covid-
19archive.org/s/archive/page/Share
48
30. Latham, S., & Humberd, B. (2018). Four ways jobs will respond to automation.
MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 11-14.
31. Levien, S.J., & Schumer, E.R. (2020). Harvard archivists scramble to document
daily life amid pandemic. The Harvard Crimson.
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2020/4/28/coronavirus-community-archive-
project/
32. Lown, C., Sierra, T., & Boyer, J. (2013). How users search the library from a single
search box. College & Research Libraries, 74, 227–241.
33. Maceli, M. (2018). Technology savvy librarians versus (librarian) technologist:
Understanding the future role of librarians in technology practice. In J. Percell
(Ed.), Re-envisioning the MLS: Perspectives on the future of library and
information science education (pp. 153-179). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald.
34. Markoff, J. (2011). Computer wins on ‘jeopardy!’: trivial, it’s not. New York Times,
16.
35. Marx, A. W. (2020, May 31). Libraries must change. The New York Times.
Retrieved from https://nytimes.com/2020/05/28/opinion/libraries-coronavirus.html
36. Massis, B. (2015). Using virtual and augmented reality in the library. New Library
World, 116, 796–799.
37. McNeal, M. L., & Newyear, D. (2013). Introducing chatbots in libraries. Library
technology reports, 49(8), 5-10.
38. Melchionda, M. G. (2007). Librarians in the age of the internet: Their attitudes and
roles: A literature review. New Library World, 108(3/4), 123-140.
39. Moorefield-Lang, M.H. (2014). Makers in the library: Case studies of 3D printers
and maker spaces in library settings. Library Hi Tech, 32, 583–593.
49
40. Padilla, T. (2019). Responsible Operations: Data Science, Machine Learning, and
AI in Libraries. OCLC.
41. Parry, M. (2020). Historical archives once silenced marginalized voices. Now
pandemic archivists want them to be heard. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
https://www.chronicle.com/article/Historical-Archives-Once/248693
42. Shaw, R. (2019). The missing profession: Towards an institution of critical
technical practice. Information Research, 24(4). http://informationr.net/ir/24-
4/colis/colis1904.html
43. Slota, S. C., Fleischmann, K. R., Greenberg, S. R., Verma, N., Cummings, B., Li,
L., & Shenefiel, S. (2020). Good systems, bad data: Interpretations of AI hype and
failures. Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Information
Science & Technology.
44. Stevenson, J. (2008). The online archivist: A positive approach to the digital
information age. What are archives, 89-106.
45. Surden, H. (2019). Artificial intelligence and law: An overview. Georgia State
University Law Review, 35, 1305–1337.
46. Suster, M. (2006). Folksonomy. AIIM E - Doc Magazine, 20(6), 20–21.
47. Wellisch, H. H. (1981). Ebla: The world's oldest library. The Journal of Library
History, 16, 488-500.
48. Willett, R. (2016). Making, makers, and makerspaces: A discourse analysis of
professional journal articles and blog posts about makerspaces in public libraries.
The Library Quarterly, 86, 313–329.
49. Williams, R. (2019). Artificial intelligence assistants in the library: Siri, Alexa, and
beyond. Online Searcher, 43(3).
50
http://www.infotoday.com/OnlineSearcher/Articles/Features/Artificial-
Intelligence-Assistants-in-the-Library-Siri-Alexa-and-Beyond-131529.shtml
50. Wood, B. A., & Evans, D. J. (2018). Librarians' perceptions of artificial intelligence
and its potential impact on the profession. Computers in Libraries, 38(1), 26-30.
51. Xie, B., He, D., Mercer, T., Wang, Y., Wu, D., Fleischmann, K. R., Zhang, Y.,
Yoder, L. H., Stephens, K. K., Mackert, M., & Lee, M. K. (In Press). Global health
crises are also information crises: A call to action. Journal of the Association for
Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24357
52. Yi, S., Slota, S. C., Bailey, J. O, Watkins, S. C., & Fleischmann, K. R. 2020.
Understanding how African-American and Latinx youth evaluate their experiences
with digital assistants. Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Association
for Information Science & Technology.
53. Young, P. R. (1996). Librarianship: A changing profession. Daedalus, 125(4), 103-
125.
54. Yu, K., Beam, A., Kohane, I., & Yu, K. (2018). Artificial intelligence in healthcare.
Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2, 719–731.
55. Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet, 395(10225), 676.