computers in libraries, march 2009 dan wendling, mls, & neal kaske, phd wendlingd@acm
DESCRIPTION
Student research behavior — prototype application From research conducted at the University of Maryland, 2005-2006. Computers in Libraries, March 2009 Dan Wendling, MLS, & Neal Kaske, PhD [email protected] http://ponder-matic.com. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Student research behavior — prototype application
From research conducted at the University of Maryland, 2005-2006
Computers in Libraries, March 2009Dan Wendling, MLS, & Neal Kaske, PhD
[email protected]://ponder-matic.com
http://www.ponder-matic.com
How do students use Google in their last course-related search for information? (n=544; 2005-06)
Who
When
How
http://www.ponder-matic.com
How do students use UMD’s ResearchPort in their last course-related search? (n=544; 2005-06)
(ResearchPort is the University of Maryland Libraries’ gateway to licensed content.)
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Comparison of who used Google and ResearchPort in course-related searching (n=544)
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Comparison of when Google and ResearchPort were accessed in course-related searching (n=544)
http://www.ponder-matic.com
This presentation
How should we describe information-seeking behavior? Project research questions / methodology
Demonstration of the application prototype at http://www.ponder-matic.com
Results, conclusions, next steps
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Foudy, Johnson, & Kaske 2005 research questions
1. What are contemporary university students’ information-seeking behaviors and what role(s), if any, do libraries and/or librarians play in these behaviors?
2. What are contemporary students’ mental models of the tasks performed by librarians?
3. Do these behaviors or mental models differ according to level of matriculation, from freshmen through graduate students?
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Basic Research Design Methodology: Mixed Method Approach, 2005-2006
Individual interviews with 544 students
(N=544; 256 + 288) On campus Not in, not near a library Sampling –“convenience” Critical incident reporting Run one week in April
2005 and one week in November 2006
Focus group interviews with 110 students
(N=12; 110 participants) 3 groups each for:
Freshmen Sophomores Juniors & Seniors Graduate students
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Individual Interview Form (page 1 of 2)
(Reproduced in your conference book and on our web site.)
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Project coding sheet, version 9
(See conference book or web site for version 10.)
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Model: How students move through information space
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Anatomy of one session, a ResearchPort search
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Demo of the prototype at http://www.ponder-matic.com
http://www.ponder-matic.com
What makes projects like this work
Selected bullets from the book Competing on Analytics, by Davenport and Harris, “Signposts of effective IT”: Information workers spend their time analyzing data and
understanding its implications rather than collecting and formatting data.
Managers focus on improving processes and business performance, not culling data.
A hypothesis can be quickly analyzed and tested without a lot of manual behind-the-scenes preparation beforehand.
Analysts have direct, nearly instantaneous access to data.
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Where to go for more background
Your conference book LOEX Library Instruction Conference Procedings 2006:
“Is Google God? How do students look for information today?” (description)
Paper for ARL’s 2008 Library Assessment Conference, Student research behavior: Quantitative and qualitative research findings presented with visualizations.
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Key influences
Competing on Analytics, a business book by Tom Davenport and Jeanne Harris A ‘good Google’ Also the podcast “Competing on Analytics” by Jeanne Harris
A presentation on information visualization by Ben Shneiderman
The ideas about the importance of assessing libraries locally
Our bibliography has more information
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Acknowledgements
University of Maryland students of the College of Information Studies, LBSC 713: Planning & Evaluating Library Services, two classes: Spring semester 2005 Fall semester 2006
Initial project funding from the University of Maryland Libraries
http://www.ponder-matic.com
Contact Information
Web site: http://www.ponder-matic.com
Dan Wendling, MLS: [email protected] Neal K. Kaske, PhD: [email protected]
The contents of this presentation reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the opinions, facts, and the accuracy of the data presented. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the author’s employers or of the University of Maryland Libraries.
Questions?