comparison of matrigel™ and gelatin substrata for feeder-free culture of undifferentiated mouse...
TRANSCRIPT
www.elsevier.com/locate/toxinvit
Toxicology in Vitro 19 (2005) 389–397
Comparison of MatrigelTM and gelatin substratafor feeder-free culture of undifferentiated mouse embryonic
stem cells for toxicity testing
A.R. Greenlee *,1, T.A. Kronenwetter-Koepel, S.J. Kaiser, K. Liu 2
Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, 1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA
Received 10 May 2004; accepted 18 November 2004
Abstract
Murine embryonic stem (mES) cells have been used to evaluate cytotoxicity and developmental injury following exposure to
embryotoxic agents. However, maintaining a homogeneous population of undifferentiated mES cells for this purpose has been com-
plicated by the need for continuous co-culture with murine embryonic fibroblast (mEF) cells or limited passaging on plastic surfaces
coated with gelatin. Here, we compare the synthetic basement membrane MatrigelTM with 0.1% gelatin substratum for feeder-free
propagation of undifferentiated mES cells. Biomarkers of pluripotentiality, chromosome number, caspase-3 expression, and cardio-
myocyte differentiation were monitored for mES cells cultured on MatrigelTM or 0.1% gelatin up to passage 7 (P7). Our results suggest
that choice of substratum had no significant effect on population doubling time, cell viability, stage-specific embryonic antigen-1
(SSEA-1) expression, or early passage formation of beating cardiomyocytes (all PP 0.09). In other comparisons, however, Matri-
gelTM supported significantly higher synthesis of alkaline phosphatase (7.7 · 10�3 ± 0.8 vs 6.6 · 10�3 ± 0.8 units/liter/cell, respec-
tively, P = 0.012), overall expression of activated caspase-3 following exposure to 5, 10, 50, 100 and 500 parts per billion (ppb)
sodium arsenite (P < 0.0001), and percent development to beating cardiomyocytes at P7 (P = 0.01). Together, our findings suggest
that MatrigelTM shows promise as a substrate for feeder-free propagation of undifferentiated mES cells for embryotoxicity endpoints.
� 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Mouse embryonic stem cells; MatrigelTM; Gelatin; Alkaline phosphatase; SSEA-1 expression; Cardiomyocyte differentiation; Caspase-3;
Chromosome number
0887-2333/$ - see front matter � 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2004.11.002
Abbreviations: ATCC, American Type Culture Collection; bFGF,
basic fibroblast growth factor; BSA, bovine serum albumin; DMEM,
Dulbecco�s modified Eagle�s medium; EB, embryoid body; EDTA,
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; EST, embryonic stem cell test; hES,
human embryonic stem; hSCF, human stem cell factor; LIF, leukemia
inhibitory factor; mEF, murine embryonic fibroblast; mES, murine
embryonic stem; P, passage; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; ppb, parts
per billion; PS, pen/strep; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase
chain reaction; SSEA-1, stage-specific embryonic antigen-1.* Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +1 541 962 3389.
E-mail address: [email protected] (A.R. Greenlee).1 Current address: Oregon Health and Science University, School
of Nursing, One University Boulevard, LaGrande, OR 97850, USA.2 Current address: Department of Biostatistics, Forest Research
Institute, Harborside Financial Center, Plaza V, Jersey City, NJ 07303,
USA.
1. Introduction
Undifferentiated murine embryonic stem (mES) cells,
derived from the inner cell mass of blastocyst-stage em-
bryos, have shown promise as indicators of cellular death
and developmental injury following exposure to embryo-
toxic agents (Spielmann et al., 1997). Depending on envi-
ronmental cues, stem cells have the ability to eitherperpetually divide or step through a series of matura-
tional changes that mirror normal embryonic develop-
ment. Cellular death and altered progression of mES
cells to pulsating cardiomyocytes in the presence of chem-
ical toxicants serve as two endpoints for the embryonic
390 A.R. Greenlee et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 19 (2005) 389–397
stem cell test (EST) (Wobus et al., 1991; Spielmann et al.,
1997). Validation studies suggest the EST assay reliably
discriminates between three classes of test compounds
with differing toxicity potentials (Scholz et al., 1999;
Spielmann et al., 2001). Improvements to the assay
include the incorporation of molecular endpoints of so-matic cell differentiation using reporter genes and cDNA
microarrays (Rohwedel et al., 2001; Seiler et al., 2004).
The recent discovery that mES cells have the capacity
to develop into male or female gametes presents the
opportunity to examine toxicant effects on the reproduc-
tive cycle at its earliest juncture (Hubner et al., 2003; Ohta
et al., 2004; Geijsen et al., 2004).
Maintaining a homogeneous population of undiffer-entiated mES cells is fundamental to the reliability and
reproducibility of the EST. Co-culturing stem cells with
mitotically inactivated murine embryonic fibroblasts
(mEFs) has been used for this purpose (Heuer et al.,
1993). However, the mixing of cell types makes cytotoxi-
city and other endpoints difficult to measure in the tar-
get mES cells. Strategies for feeder-free maintenance of
undifferentiated mES cells include supplementing med-ium with growth factors (Williams et al., 1988; Pease
et al., 1990) or conditioned medium (Vogel, 1993), coat-
ing growth surfaces with gelatin, or frequent subcultur-
ing of cells on plastic surfaces (Spielmann et al., 1997).
Despite these efforts to maintain a pluripotential pheno-
type over time, changes in morphology and biomarkers
suggest gains in differentiation and declines in the num-
ber of cells undergoing self-renewal.The present study evaluates two substrata, MatrigelTM
and 0.1% gelatin, for their ability to maintain a homoge-
neous population of undifferentiated mES cells without
fibroblast feeder layers. Biomarkers of pluripotentiality,
chromosome number, caspase-3 expression, growth
characteristics, and cardiomyocyte differentiation were
monitored up to passage 7 (P7). Our findings suggest
that MatrigelTM, in combination with growth factors,provides an alternative, unified approach for feeder-free
propagation of undifferentiated mES cells for embryo-
toxic endpoints. A streamlined regimen for maintaining
undifferentiated stem cells may help with large-scale test-
ing strategies aimed at reducing the backlog of xenobio-
tics with uncharacterized effects on early development
(Congress of the US OTA, 1995; Chapin et al., 2004).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Experimental design
The purpose of these experiments was to determine
the effects of two substrata on the pluripotential state
of mES cells up to seven passages in vitro. MatrigelTM
and 0.1% gelatin substrata, in combination with three
growth factors (leukemia inhibitory factor, LIF; basic
fibroblast growth factor, bFGF; and, human stem cell
factor, hSCF) (Matsui et al., 1992) were compared for
their ability to support mES cell expression of biomark-
ers of differentiation and cytotoxicity. Chromosome
number, cell doubling time, and viability of mES grown
on the two substrata were also evaluated.
2.2. Cells and growth factors
D3 mES cells from mouse blastocyst embryos
(Doetschman et al., 1985) were purchased as frozen ali-
quots from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC;
CRL 1934, Manassas, VA, USA). Culture medium con-
sisted of 90% Dulbecco�s modified Eagle�s medium(DMEM; ATCC), 10% VitacellTM fetal bovine serum
(ATCC), 0.1 mM b-mercaptoethanol, 10 U/ml penicillin
and 10 lg/ml streptomycin (Sigma Chemical Co., St.
Louis, MO, USA), 1000 U/ml LIF (Chemicon Interna-
tional, Inc., Temecula, CA, USA), 20 ng/ml recombi-
nant human bFGF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN,
USA) and 40 ng/ml recombinant hSCF (R&D Systems).
LIF was stored as a sterile solution at 4 �C. The hSCFwas received lyophilized and reconstituted with sterile
1· phosphate buffered saline (PBS), 0.4% bovine serum
albumin (BSA), and 1% pen/strep (PS), aliquoted and
stored at �20 �C. The bFGF was reconstituted with
PBS/BSA/PS, as above, plus 100 ng/ml heparin.
2.3. Preparation of MatrigelTM and gelatin substrata
Cells were plated at a density of 5 · 104 cells onto either
a layer of growth factor-reduced MatrigelTM (Becton
Dickinson Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA)
or 0.1% gelatin (G2500, Porcine Skin Type A, Sigma).
MatrigelTM wells were prepared by spreading 50 ll ali-quots of cold undilutedMatrigelTM into Falcon 35 mm tis-
sue culture wells (Becton Dickinson and Co., Franklin
Lakes, NJ, USA) maintained on ice. Substratum gelledby incubating covered plates 2 h at room temperature.
Gelatin-coated wells were prepared by adding 2.0 ml ali-
quots of 0.1% gelatin in PBS to Falcon 35 mm tissue cul-
ture wells. Gelatin was aspirated after 5 min, leaving a
light film. Culture medium was immediately added to
the gelatin-coated wells to prevent desiccation. Matri-
gelTM- and gelatin-coated plates were used the same day.
mES cells were passaged every 3 or 4 days in 35 mmwells on MatrigelTM or gelatin. Adherent mES cells were
dissociated with 0.25% trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraace-
tic acid (EDTA; Gibco-Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY,
USA) at 37 �C for 10 min and washed in culture medium
without growth factors.
2.4. Control cell populations
Cryopreserved mES cells, previously expanded on
MatrigelTM and characterized for SSEA-1 expression at
A.R. Greenlee et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 19 (2005) 389–397 391
P4, were used as a positive control for SSEA-1 activity of
mES cells grown on the two substrata. The cryopreserved
mES cells served as a positive control formonitoring anti-
body activity and standardizing flow cytometer settings.
Differentiated, mEFs (CRL 1503; ATCC) were used
as a negative control for alkaline phosphatase expres-sion. mEFs were cultured in 90% DMEM, 10% Vita-
cellTM fetal bovine serum, 0.1 mM b-mercaptoethanol,
10 U/ml penicillin, and 10 lg/ml streptomycin without
additional growth factors. Cells were plated at low den-
sity in T-25 cm2 flasks (Becton Dickinson Labware, Bed-
ford, MA, USA) without MatrigelTM or gelatin and
passaged at confluency. On the day of biomarker analy-
sis, mEFs were dissociated, washed, and used at cell con-centrations matched to those of mES cells.
2.5. Cell growth and viability
Population doubling time per 24 h and cell viability
were evaluated to determine changes in growth charac-
teristics for cells cultured to P7 on MatrigelTM or 0.1%
gelatin. Cumulative population doublings were deter-mined using the method described in McAteer and
Davis (1994). It was assumed that the population growth
was exponential at the plating density used. The number
of generations was then determined using common loga-
rithms and expressed as population doublings per 24 h.
Cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion.
2.6. Chromosome number
The number of chromosomes per metaphase spread
was determined for mES cells cultured on MatrigelTM
or 0.1% gelatin. Spreads were prepared using the meth-
od of MacDonald (1994). Chromosome counts were
performed on 20 spreads from each treatment group at
P1 and P4. Chromosome numbers per spread were deter-
mined using photographs from a Nikon Eclipse 600microscope and digital spotmatic camera at 600·magnification.
2.7. Alkaline phosphatase activity
Two techniques were used to determine alkaline phos-
phatase activity for cells cultured on MatrigelTM or 0.1%
gelatin. A staining protocol described by Donovan et al.(1986) was used to screen for enzyme activity character-
ized as a red reaction product in adherent mES cell colo-
nies. Specific enzyme activitywas inhibited in the presence
of 1 mM levamisole hydrochloride (L9756, Sigma). Cells
were photographed before and 15 min after adding the
stain using 100· magnification on a Nikon Diaphot in-
verted microscope fitted with a Nikon 2000 SLR camera.
An enzyme quantification kit (ALP10, Sigma) wasused to more precisely measure alkaline phosphatase
activity on a per cell basis. Adherent mES cells and
negative control mEF cells were dissociated, washed,
and adjusted to 3 · 106 cells/ml. A total of 2 · 104 cells
in 6 ll was lysed with 1 ll of 0.1% Triton-X (Sigma)
for 5 min before adding to 318 ll of p-nitrophenyl phos-phate. Alkaline phosphatase activity, in enzyme units/
liter/cell, was determined at kabs 405 nm, 37 �C at1 min intervals for 10 min using a Beckman DU-600
spectrophotometer and instrument software. Positive
controls, provided with the kit, and mEF negative con-
trol cells were included with each assay. Results were ac-
cepted when mean control values were within defined
limits.
2.8. SSEA-1 immunofluorescence
mES cells were analyzed for SSEA-1 expression after
passaging to P5 on MatrigelTM or 0.1% gelatin. Positive
control mES cells were included in each assay. Adher-
ent cells were dissociated, rinsed in 500 ll Perm/WashTM
buffer (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) and
counted. A total of 105 cells from each population in
10 ll were added to wells of a microtiter plate (Lab-Source, Chicago, IL, USA), fixed 30 min in 190 llCytofix/CytopermTM solution (Pharmingen), and washed
twice with 200 ll Perm/WashTM buffer, then incubated
30 min on ice with 100 ll mouse SSEA-1 antibody
(Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City,
IA, USA) diluted 1:4 in Perm/WashTM buffer. Cells were
rinsed twice with 200 ll Perm/WashTM buffer and then
incubated 30 min on ice in the dark with 100 ll goatanti-mouse immunoglobulin-FITC (Pharmingen) di-
luted 1:50 in Perm/WashTM buffer. Cells were then
washed twice and diluted in 400 ll Perm/WashTM buffer.
Analysis was performed on a MoFloTM (DakoCytoma-
tion, Fort Collins, CO, USA) flow cytometer with an
Omnichrome visible laser (Melles Griot, Carlsbad,
CA, USA) at 488 nm and 155 mW. A total of 10,000
cells was analyzed for each specimen. Data acquisitionand analyses were performed using SummitTM software
(DakoCytomation).
2.9. Detection of activated caspase-3
Sodium arsenite was chosen as a model toxicant be-
cause it is a known teratogen and activator of cellular
death by apoptosis (Mirkes and Little, 1998). Arseniccontaminated water is a human concern because of the
increased risk for spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, and
preterm delivery reported for women drinking water
with high levels of arsenic (Ahmad et al., 2001). mES
cells, cultured on either MatrigelTM or 0.1% gelatin, were
incubated 16 h with 0, 5, 10, 50, 100, and 500 parts per
billion (ppb) sodium arsenite diluted in culture medium
(J.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). At the end of theexposure period, cells were dissociated, washed in PBS
(pH 7.2), counted, and 105 cells from each population
392 A.R. Greenlee et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 19 (2005) 389–397
were added to microtiter wells. Cells were pelleted and
fixed 30 min at room temperature with 100 ll Cytofix/CytopermTM. Cells were washed twice in 200 ll Perm/
WashTM buffer and incubated 1 h at room temperature
with 100 ll of a 1:10 dilution of purified phycoery-
thrin-conjugated rabbit anti-activated caspase-3 mono-clonal antibody (Pharmingen). Cells were washed twice
in 200 ll Perm/WashTM buffer and diluted to 400 ll inPerm/WashTM buffer. Ten thousand cells from each pop-
ulation were analyzed on a MoFloTM flow cytometer.
2.10. Differentiation into cardiomyocytes
Differentiation of mES cells into embryoid bodies(EBs) (aggregates of differentiating embryonic stem
cells) and contracting cardiomyocytes was determined
using the ‘‘hanging drop’’ method (Wobus et al.,
1991). mES cells cultured on either MatrigelTM or 0.1%
gelatin were harvested at P1 and P7 and dissociated,
washed, and suspended in EB medium containing 80%
DMEM, 15% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM LL-glutamine,
0.1 mM b-mercaptoethanol, 10 U/ml penicillin/10 lg/ml streptomycin, and no growth factors. Droplets
(20 ll each) containing approximately 1000 cells from
each population were placed on the lids of 100 mm petri
dishes filled with 5 ml 1· PBS. Closed plates were incu-
bated 3 days at 5% CO2, 37 �C at which time aggregates
within the hanging droplets were pooled and transferred
to 100 mm non-adhesive Falcon Optilux tissue culture
plates and incubated an additional 3 days in EB med-ium. Individual EBs were placed into Falcon 24 well tis-
sue culture plates (Becton Dickinson Labware) and
observed daily for 2 weeks for attachment and develop-
ment into pulsating cardiomyocytes.
Fig. 1. Line graphs comparing population doublings per 24 h and
percent viability for mES cells cultured on MatrigelTM or 0.1% gelatin.
Open boxes and triangles correspond to the means of duplicate values
for cells grown on MatrigelTM. Closed boxes and triangles correspond
to means of duplicate values for cells grown on 0.1% gelatin. Choice of
substratum did not affect mean population doublings per 24 h
(P = 0.09) or mean percent cell viability (P = 0.77).
2.11. Statistics
Two-way ANOVA was used to compare the effect of2 substrata (MatrigelTM or gelatin) on population dou-
blings and cell viability over seven passages. Difference
among two substrata and one positive control with re-
spect to SSEA-1 expression was tested using two-way
ANOVA after controlling for experimental conditions.
Three-way ANOVA was employed to analyze caspase-
3 expression with substratum, dose of sodium arsenite
and experimental conditions as the three analysis fac-tors. Post-hoc, pair wise comparisons were conducted
using t-tests. One-way ANOVA was applied to evaluate
the effects of substrata on alkaline phosphatase synthe-
sis, followed by pair wise t-test. Percent development
of beating cardiomyocytes was compared between two
substrata at P1 and P7 using linear mixed models to ac-
count for the correlation among measurements across
days in cultures (Verbeke and Molenberghs, 2000). TheP-values were not adjusted for multiple comparisons.
3. Results
3.1. Cell growth, viability and chromosome numbers
Population doublings per 24 h and percent viability
were measured at each passage to determine if mES cellsdisplayed differences in growth characteristics related to
substratum over seven passages (Fig. 1). Cell popula-
tions doubled a mean of 1.5 ± 0.1 and 1.4 ± 0.2 times
every 24 h for cells grown on MatrigelTM or gelatin,
respectively (P = 0.09). Cell viability was not signifi-
cantly different for mES cells grown on MatrigelTM or
gelatin substrata (98.0 ± 1.2% vs 97.7 ± 2.0%, respec-
tively, P = 0.77).Chromosome counts were performed on 20 meta-
phase spreads for P1 and P4 mES cells maintained on
either MatrigelTM or gelatin (Table 1). Of mES cells
grown on MatrigelTM or gelatin, 35–45% contained 40
chromosomes (modal number for mouse), 10–20% con-
tained less than 40 chromosomes, and 35–55% con-
tained more than 40 chromosomes. These findings
suggest that the mES cells used in our study were aneu-ploid at the start of the experiment and that chromo-
some numbers were unaffected by choice substratum.
3.2. Alkaline phosphatase activity and colony morphology
Alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity is a marker of
undifferentiated embryonic cells. An enzyme staining
protocol and a quantification assay were used to com-pare the effects of substrata on enzyme levels in mES
cells at P7. Fig. 2a and b show staining results of mES
cells before and after incubating cells grown on Matri-
gelTM with reagents specific for alkaline phosphatase.
Fig. 2c and d show results for cells grown on 0.1% gel-
atin. The amount of red cytoplasmic staining suggests
both substrata supported alkaline phosphatase synthesis
Fig. 3. Bar graph showing mean alkaline phosphatase enzyme units
per liter per cell ± SD for mES cells cultured on MatrigelTM or gelatin.
Results indicate that mES cells grown on MatrigelTM synthesize greater
amounts of alkaline phosphatase than cells grown on 0.1% gelatin
(P = 0.012). The negative control cells (differentiated mEF cells)
synthesized significantly less alkaline phosphatase than either mES
cell population (both P < 0.0001).
Fig. 2. Photomicrographs of mES cells cultured seven passages on MatrigelTM (2a, 2b) or 0.1% gelatin (2c, 2d). Figs. 2a and c show results before
addition of the stain to detect alkaline phosphatase activity and Figs. 2b and d show results 15 min after staining with reagents. Stem cells on
MatrigelTM grew as uniformly concentric, compact, raised colonies (2a, 2b), whereas colonies on gelatin (2c, 2d) grew as spreading, flattened colonies
with an occasionally round, raised colony. Cells negative for enzymatic activity appear colorless after staining (region with black-filled arrow, 2d).
Table 1
Distribution of 20 metaphase spreads for mES cells cultured on MatrigelTM or gelatin evaluated at P1 and P4
Substratum Number of chromosomes per metaphase spread
638 39 40 41 42 P43 Total spreads examined
MatrigelTM P1 2 0 7 7 1 3 20
Gelatin P1 2 1 8 7 0 2 20
MatrigelTM P4 1 1 8 8 0 2 20
Gelatin P4 2 2 9 5 0 2 20
A.R. Greenlee et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 19 (2005) 389–397 393
to P7. The staining reaction was inhibited by the addi-
tion of enzyme-specific 1 mM levamisole hydrochloride
(data not shown).Fig. 2 demonstrates colony morphologies representa-
tive of mES cells grown on the two substrata. Stem cells
growing on MatrigelTM (Fig. 2a and b) appeared as uni-
formly concentric, compact, raised colonies. mES cells
growing on gelatin (Fig. 2c and d) appeared as spread-
ing, flattened colonies with an occasionally round and
raised appearance.
A quantification assay was used to more preciselymeasure alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity in cells
grown on the two substrata. Fig. 3 shows significantly
higher amounts of enzyme activity in mES cells grown
on MatrigelTM when compared to results of cells on gel-
atin (7.7 · 10�3 ± 0.8 vs 6.6 · 10�3 ± 0.8 units/liter/cell,
respectively, P = 0.012). In comparison to mEF differen-
tiated control cells (1.09 · 10�3 ± 0.07 units/liter/cell),
undifferentiated mES cells grown on MatrigelTM or gela-tin synthesized significantly greater amounts of alkaline
phosphatase (both P < 0.0001).
3.3. SSEA-1 activity
The monoclonal antibody SSEA-1 defines a stage-
specific mouse embryonic antigen and is useful as a
Fig. 4. Bar graphs showing mean percent SSEA-1 ± SD for mES cells
cultured on MatrigelTM or 0.1% gelatin. Approximately 67% and 65%
of mES cells grown on MatrigelTM and 0.1% gelatin express SSEA-1,
respectively (P = 0.64). Data points represent triplicate observations
from two independent experiments. Comparisons with results obtained
for the positive control cells suggest that SSEA-1 expression was not
significantly different from that obtained for cells grown on the two
substrata (all P P 0.56).
Fig. 6. Comparison of beating cardiomyocyte formation over 14 days
of observation using EBs from mES cells cultured on MatrigelTM (P1,
open squares; P7, open triangles) or 0.1% gelatin (P1, closed squares;
P7, closed triangles). Percent beating cardiomyocyte formation was not
significantly different for P1 cells grown on MatrigelTM or gelatin
substrata (P = 0.26). However, MatrigelTM supported significantly
higher cardiomyocyte formation when substrata were compared at
P7 (P = 0.01).
394 A.R. Greenlee et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 19 (2005) 389–397
marker of undifferentiated mES cells (Solter and
Knowles, 1978). As shown in Fig. 4, expression of
SSEA-1 in mES cells grown on MatrigelTM or gelatin
to P5 was not significantly different for the two treat-
ments (66.7 ± 2.7% vs 65.5 ± 4.3%, respectively, P =
0.64). Mean percent SSEA-1 expression by positive
control cells (thawed aliquots of P4 mES cells previouslycharacterized for SSEA-1) was 65.6 ± 6.3% which was
not significantly different from results of mES cells
grown on either of the two substrata (both comparisons
P P 0.56).
3.4. Expression of activated caspase-3
Activated caspase-3 is a biomarker for the apoptoticcellular death pathway (Woo et al., 1998). As shown in
Fig. 5. Line graphs comparing percent activated caspase-3 expres-
sion ± SD for mES cells cultured on MatrigelTM or 0.1% gelatin
following 16 h incubation with 0, 5, 10, 50, 100 and 500 ppb sodium
arsenite. In comparison to mES cells grown on gelatin (closed squares),
overall expression of activated caspase-3 is significantly higher for mES
cells grown on MatrigelTM (open squares) (P < 0.0001). Data points
(n = 12) for cells grown on MatrigelTM represent triplicate observations
at each dose from four experiments. Data points for cells grown on
gelatin (n = 6) represent triplicate observations at each dose from two
experiments.
Fig. 5, mES cells cultured on MatrigelTM or gelatin to P5
were compared for expression of activated caspase-3 fol-
lowing a 16 h exposure to 0, 5, 10, 50, 100, and 500 ppb
sodium arsenite. In comparison to mES cells grown on
gelatin, expression of activated caspase-3 in response
to arsenite was significantly higher for mES cells grown
on MatrigelTM (P < 0.0001). These results suggest that
cells cultured to P5 on MatrigelTM were better able to
activate caspase-3 in response to increasing doses ofarsenite.
3.5. Differentiation assay
Percent development to beating cardiomyocytes is a
primary endpoint for the EST and measures stem cell
capacity for terminal differentiation. MatrigelTM effects
on mES cell differentiation were not known. Therefore,mES cells cultured on MatrigelTM or 0.1% gelatin were
harvested at P1 and P7 for comparisons of cardiomyo-
cyte differentiation. As shown in Fig. 6, percent develop-
ment to pulsating cardiomyocytes was not significantly
different for cells cultured on MatrigelTM or gelatin at
P1 (P = 0.26). However, at P7, significantly higher per-
centages of beating cardiomyocytes formed using popu-
lations of mES cells cultured on MatrigelTM (P = 0.01).
4. Discussion
EST is the only validated in vitro assay for develop-
mental toxicology that does not require pregnant ani-
mals (Spielmann et al., 1997). The test provides an
excellent starting point for creating automated, high-throughput screening systems for testing drugs and
chemicals. In addition to the classical endpoints of cyto-
A.R. Greenlee et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 19 (2005) 389–397 395
toxicity and somatic differentiation, the assay now
includes quantitative assessment of gene expression
by flow cytofluorimetry (Seiler et al., 2004), reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
(Schmidt et al., 2001) and DNA microarrays (Kelly
and Rizzino, 2000). Maintaining a homogeneous, well-characterized population of undifferentiated mES cells
is fundamental to these toxicity assays. Currently,
pluripotent mES cells for cytotoxicity studies are main-
tained without feeders by frequent subculturing on plas-
tic or gelatin-coated surfaces (Spielmann et al., 1997),
while pluripotent mES cells for terminal differentiation
studies are maintained on mouse fibroblast feeder layers
(Heuer et al., 1994). Our findings suggest that Matri-gelTM, without feeder cells, in combination with three
growth factors (LIF, hSCF and bFGF), may offer an
alternative strategy for unifying and standardizing
conditions for long-term culture of undifferentiated
mES cells.
The decision to evaluate MatrigelTM for feeder-free
propagation of mES cells was prompted by the findings
of Xu et al. (2001, 2002) that demonstrated humanembryonic stem (hES) cells grown on MatrigelTM with
conditioned medium maintained a normal karyotype,
stable proliferation rate, and pluripotential biomarker
profile for more than 200 population doublings. With-
drawal of conditioned medium and substratum resulted
in transformation of the stem cells to EBs and beat-
ing cardiomyocytes. Our comparison of MatrigelTM and
gelatin revealed no substratum differences regardingcell viability, population doubling times or expression
of SSEA-1 during the period of observation. However,
MatrigelTM supported significantly higher mES cell
alkaline phosphatase enzymatic activity, caspase-3 acti-
vation, and cardiomyocyte formation at the later pas-
sage. Morphologically, mES cells on MatrigelTM
retained an undifferentiated appearance with predomi-
nantly raised, compact, circular colonies. Subsequentstudies on the combined effects of MatrigelTM and growth
factors on long-term maintenance of undifferentiated
mES cells (119 population doublings) were recently re-
ported (Greenlee et al., 2004). Biomarker findings over
10 weeks of continuous culture suggested MatrigelTM
combined with growth factors sustained a population
of undifferentiated mES cells. However, increased aneu-
ploidy, reduced caspase-3 activation, and stem cellinability to terminally differentiate suggest further mod-
ifications to the culture system may be required.
Cell death is an important endpoint of the EST. Cells
engaged in apoptotic cell death express increased levels
of activated caspase-3 (Sarkar and Sharma, 2002). We
compared populations of mES cells grown on MatrigelTM
or gelatin for dose-responsive expression of acti-
vated caspase-3 following exposure to sodium arseniteand found that significantly higher levels of activated
caspase-3 were achieved in mES cells maintained on
MatrigelTM. Higher levels of activated caspase-3 expres-
sion may be associated with improved capacity for dis-
criminating toxicant effects. Laschinski et al. (1991)
noted that cytotoxic responses to teratogens varied be-
tween embryonal stem cells and adult fibroblasts with
undifferentiated embryonic stem cells showing increasedsensitivity to the toxicants. In our experiments, it is pos-
sible that mES cell populations on MatrigelTM were more
uniformly undifferentiated than those maintained on
gelatin and, therefore, at greater risk of succumbing to
the cytotoxic effects of arsenite. This may be an advan-
tage when using a substrate to identify embryotoxic
challenges. However, false positive responses may result
and require caution when interpreting data.The ability of mES cells to terminally differentiate is a
key prerequisite for in vitro studies investigating the
embryotoxic effects of xenobiotics. We, therefore, mea-
sured substratum effects on the capacity of mES cells
to transform into beating cardiomyocytes at P1 and
P7. Significantly higher percentages of beating cardio-
myocytes were obtained at P1 when compared to mES
cells harvested at P7, independent of substratum. Incontrast, significantly higher percentages of beating
cardiomyocytes were obtained at P7 with mES cells
propagated on MatrigelTM compared to gelatin. The
overall decline in capacity of mES cells to terminally dif-
ferentiate by P7 may be explained by extracellular matrix
components lacking in a feeder-free culture system. Nor-
mally, cells in developing tissues are surrounded by a
fiber-composite extracellular matrix that transmitsmechanical stimuli, maintains the shape of developing
tissues, and functions as a scaffold for cell migration
and attachment (Kadler, 2004). The fact that MatrigelTM
supported a higher proportion of mES cells with poten-
tial for somatic differentiation to P7 suggests that this
substratum provided some, but not all, components
needed for long-term, feeder-free maintenance of mES
cells. It will be important to determine if mES cells cul-tured in feeder-free conditions for longer periods of time
result in further declines in somatic differentiation.
We noted that mES cells cultured from P1 to P4 on
MatrigelTM or gelatin yielded metaphase spreads in
which only 35–45% contained 40 chromosomes, with
the remaining 55–65% spreads containing more or less
than the modal number. Doetschman et al. (1985) also
reported considerable aneuploidy in D3 mES cell lines,as up to 60% of metaphase spreads prepared from D3
subcultures contained more or less than 40 chromo-
somes. Karyotypic changes have been noted for hES
cells maintained for long periods of feeder-free continu-
ous culture. Gains in chromosomes 8 and 11 have been
noted in mouse cultures and gains in 17 and 12 have
been observed in fresh and frozen subcultures of hES
cells (Draper et al., 2004). Karyotypic changes may cor-relate with a reduced ability to colonize the germ line in
chimeric mice (Mitalipov et al., 1994; Longo et al., 1997)
396 A.R. Greenlee et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 19 (2005) 389–397
or provide a selective advantage for the long-term prop-
agation of undifferentiated embryonic stem cells (Chiou
et al., 2003). Future comparisons may be well served by
earlier passages of embryonic stem cell lines or by clonal
derivatives selected for a normal karyotype (Amit et al.,
2000).Currently, the EST consists of two in vitro embryo-
toxic endpoints, cytotoxicity and percent formation of
beating cardiomyocytes. Additional efforts are needed
to validate the assay for purposes of human risk assess-
ment and to determine the relevance of the in vitro expo-
sures to in vivo pregnancy outcomes (NRC, 2000; Pryor
et al., 2000). Steps towards this objective might include
evaluating toxicant effects on mES cell differentiationinto cell types other than cardiomyocytes, e.g., neurons,
chondrocytes, or osteoblasts (Schmidt et al., 2001).
MatrigelTM is particularly well suited for this purpose,
as stem cells from rodents and humans grown on this
substratum will develop into various somatic lineages
by interchanging soluble signals (Asakura et al., 2001;
Ruhnke et al., 2003).
In summary, our findings suggest that MatrigelTM, incombination with growth factors, provides an alterna-
tive, unified approach for feeder-free propagation of
undifferentiated mES cells for embryotoxic endpoints.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the assistance of Alice Star-gardt and Linda Weis for manuscript preparation,
Tom Brunette and Amy Wilhelmi for assistance with
graphic arts, and Tammy Ellis BS, Jim Burmester
Ph.D., and Deanna Cross Ph.D. for reviewing the manu-
script. The SSEA-1 monoclonal antibody was developed
by Solter and Knowles (1978) and was obtained from
the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank main-
tained by The University of Iowa, Department of Bio-logical Sciences, Iowa City, IA, under the auspices of
NICHD. The careful reading of this manuscript by un-
known reviewers is gratefully acknowledged.
Funding for this project was provided in part by a
grant from the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation.
References
Ahmad, S.A., Sayed, M.H., Barua, S., Khan, M.H., Faruquee, M.H.,
Jalil, A., Hadi, S.A., Talukder, H.K., 2001. Arsenic in drinking
water and pregnancy outcomes. Environmental Health Perspec-
tives 109, 629–631.
Amit, M., Carpenter, M.K., Inokuma, M.S., Chiu, C.P., Harris, C.P.,
Waknitz, M.A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Thomson, J.A., 2000. Clonally
derived human embryonic stem cell lines maintain pluripotency
and proliferative potential for prolonged periods of culture.
Developmental Biology 227, 271–278.
Asakura, A., Komaki, M., Rudnicki, M.A., 2001. Muscle satellite cells
are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic and
adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation 68, 245–253.
Chapin, R.E., Robbins, W.A., Schieve, L.A., Sweeney, A.M., Taba-
cova, S.A., Tomashek, K.M., 2004. Off to a good start: the
influence of pre- and periconceptional exposures, parental fertility,
and nutrition on children�s health. Environmental Health Perspec-
tives 112, 69–78.
Chiou, S.K., Jones, M.K., Tarnawski, A.S., 2003. Survivin-an anti-
apoptosis protein: its biological roles and implications for cancer
and beyond. Medical Science Monitor 9, P143–P147.
Congress of the United States Office of Technology Assessment.,
(1995). Screening and Testing Chemicals in Commerce. OTA-BP-
ENV-166. Office of Technology Assessment, Washington. Avail-
able at: www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/~ota/disk1/
1995/9553/9553.PDF. Accessed 27 April, 2004.
Doetschman, T.C., Eistetter, H., Katz, M., Schmidt, W., Kemler, R.,
1985. The in vitro development of blastocyst-derived embryonic
stem cell lines: formation of visceral yolk sac, blood islands and
myocardium. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphol-
ogy 87, 27–45.
Donovan, P.J., Stott, D., Cairns, L.A., Heasman, J., Wylie, C.C.,
1986. Migratory and postmigratory mouse primordial germ cells
behave differently in culture. Cell 44, 831–838.
Draper, J.S., Smith, K., Gokhale, P., Moore, H.D., Maltby, E.,
Johnson, J., Meisner, L., Zwaka, T.P., Thomson, J.A., Andrews,
P.W., 2004. Recurrent gain of chromosomes 17q and 12 in cultured
human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotechnology 22, 53–54.
Geijsen, N., Horoschak, M., Kim, K., Gribnau, J., Eggan, K., Daley,
G.Q., 2004. Derivation of embryonic germ cells and male gametes
from embryonic stem cells. Nature 427, 148–154.
Greenlee, A.R., Kronenwetter-Koepel, T.A., Kaiser, S.J., Ellis, T.M.,
Liu, K., 2004. Combined effects of Matrigel and growth factors on
maintaining undifferentiated murine embryonic stem cells for
embryotoxicity testing. Toxicology in Vitro 18, 543–553.
Heuer, J., Bremer, S., Pohl, I., Spielmann, H., 1993. Development of
an in vitro embryotoxicity test using murine embryonic stem cell
cultures. Toxicology in Vitro 7, 551–556.
Heuer, J., Graeber, I., Pohl, I., Spielmann, H., 1994. Culture system
for the differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells—a new
approach to in vitro testing for embryotoxicity and for develop-
mental immunotoxicology. In: Fracchia, G.N. (Ed.), European
Medicines Research. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 134–145.
Hubner, K., Fuhrmann, G., Christenson, L.K., Kehler, J., Reinbold,
R., De La Fuente, R., Wood, J., Strauss III, J.F., Boiani, M.,
Scholer, H.R., 2003. Derivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic
stem cells. Science 300, 1251–1256.
Kadler, K., 2004. Matrix loading: assembly of extracellular matrix
collagen fibrils during embryogenesis. Birth Defects Research Part
C Embryo Today 72, 1–11.
Kelly, D.L., Rizzino, A., 2000. DNA microarray analyses of genes
regulated during the differentiation of embryonic stem cells.
Molecular Reproduction and Development 56, 113–123.
Laschinski, G., Vogel, R., Spielmann, H., 1991. Cytotoxicity test using
blastocyst-derived euploid embryonal stem cells: a new approach to
in vitro teratogenesis screening. Reproductive Toxicology 5, 57–64.
Longo, L., Bygrave, A., Grosveld, F.G., Pandolfi, P.P., 1997. The
chromosome make-up of mouse embryonic stem cells is predictive
of somatic and germ cell chimaerism. Transgenic Research 6, 321–
328.
MacDonald, C., 1994. Primary culture and the establishment of cell
lines. In: Davis, J.M. (Ed.), Basic Cell Culture. A Practical
Approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp. 160–161.
Matsui, Y., Zsebo, K., Hogan, B.L., 1992. Derivation of pluripotential
embryonic stem cells from murine primordial germ cells in culture.
Cell 70, 841–847.
A.R. Greenlee et al. / Toxicology in Vitro 19 (2005) 389–397 397
McAteer, J.A., Davis, J., 1994. Basic cell culture technique and the
maintenance of cell lines. In: Davis, J.M. (Ed.), Basic Cell Culture.
A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp. 124–126.
Mirkes, P.E., Little, S.A., 1998. Teratogen-induced cell death in
postimplantation mouse embryos: Differential tissue sensitivity and
hallmarks of apoptosis. Cell Death and Differentiation 5, 592–600.
Mitalipov, S.M., Mitalipova, M.M., Ivanov, V.I., 1994. Effect of long-
term culturing on the potential of mouse embryonic stem cells for
in vitro and in vivo development. Russian Journal of Develop-
mental Biology 25, 317–323.
National Research Council, 2000. Current practices for assessing risk
for developmental defects and their limitations. Scientific Frontiers
in Developmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment. National
Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 26–57.
Ohta, H., Wakayama, T., Nishimune, Y., 2004. Commitment of fetal
male germ cells to spermatogonial stem cells during mouse
embryonic development. Biology of Reproduction 70, 1286–1291.
Pease, S., Braghetta, P., Gearing, D., Grail, D., Williams, R.L., 1990.
Isolation of embryonic stem (ES) cells in media supplemented with
recombinant leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). Developmental
Biology 141, 344–352.
Pryor, J.L., Hughes, C., Foster, W., Hales, B.F., Robaire, B., 2000.
Critical windows of exposure for children�s health: the reproductivesystem in animals and humans. Environmental Health Perspectives
108, 491–503.
Rohwedel, J., Guan, K., Hegert, C., Wobus, A.M., 2001. Embryonic
stem cells as an in vitro model for mutagenicity, cytotoxicity and
embryotoxicity studies: present state and future prospects. Toxi-
cology in Vitro 15, 741–753.
Ruhnke, M., Ungefroren, H., Zehle, G., Bader, M., Kremer, B.,
Fandrich, F., 2003. Long-term culture and differentiation of rat
embryonic stem cell-like cells into neuronal, glial, endothelial and
hepatic lineages. Stem Cells 21, 428–436.
Sarkar, S.A., Sharma, R.P., 2002. Expression of selected apoptosis
related genes, MIF, IGIF, and TNF alpha, during retinoic acid-
induced neural differentiation in murine embryonic stem cells. Cell
Structure Function 27, 99–107.
Schmidt, M.M., Guan, K., Wobus, A.M., 2001. Lithium influences
differentiation and tissue-specific gene expression of mouse embry-
onic stem (ES) cells in vitro. International Journal of Develop-
mental Biology 45, 421–429.
Scholz, G., Pohl, I., Genschow, E., Klemm, M., Spielmann, H., 1999.
Embryotoxicity screening using embryonic stem cells in vitro:
correlation to in vivo teratogenicity. Cells Tissues Organs 165, 203–
211.
Seiler, A., Visan, A., Buesen, R., Genschow, E., Spielmann, H., 2004.
Improvement of an in vitro stem cell assay for developmental
toxicity: the use of molecular endpoints in the embryonic stem cell
test. Reproductive Toxicology 18, 231–240.
Solter, D., Knowles, B.B., 1978. Monoclonal antibody defining a
stage-specific mouse embryonic antigen (SSEA-1). Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences USA 75, 5565–5569.
Spielmann, H., Pohl, I., Doring, B., Liebsch, M., Moldenhauer, F.,
1997. The embryonic stem cell test, an in vitro embryotoxicity test
using two permanent mouse cell lines: 3T3 fibroblasts and
embryonic stem cells. In Vitro Toxicology 10, 119–127.
Spielmann, H., Genschow, E., Scholz, G., Brown, N.A., Piersma,
A.H., Brady, M., Clemann, N., Huuskonen, H., Paillard, F.,
Bremer, S., Becker, K., 2001. Preliminary results of the ECVAM
validation study on three in vitro embryotoxicity tests. ATLA 29,
301–303.
Verbeke, G., Molenberghs, G., 2000. In: Bickel, P., Diggle, P.,
Fienberg, S., Krickeberg, K., Olkin, I., Wermuth, N., Zeger, S.
(Eds.), Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. Springer-
Verlag, New York, pp. 23–24.
Vogel, R., 1993. In vitro approach to fertility research: genotoxicity
tests on primordial germ cells and embryonic stem cells. Repro-
ductive Toxicology 7, 69–73.
Williams, R.L., Hilton, D.J., Pease, S., Wilson, T.A., Stewart, C.L.,
Gearing, D.P., Wagner, E.F., Metcalf, D., Nicola, N.A., Gough,
N.M., 1988. Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the
developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 336, 684–
687.
Wobus, A.M., Wallukat, G., Hescheler, J., 1991. Pluripotent
mouse embryonic stem cells are able to differentiate into cardio-
myocytes expressing chronotropic responses to adrenergic and
cholinergic agents and Ca2+ channel blockers. Differentiation 48,
173–182.
Woo, M., Hakem, R., Soengas, M.S., Duncan, G.S., Shahinian, A.,
Kagi, D., Hakem, A., McCurrach, M., Khoo, W., Kaufman, S.A.,
Senaldi, G., Howard, T., Lowe, S.W., Mak, T.W., 1998. Essential
contribution of caspase-3/CPP32 to apoptosis and its associated
nuclear changes. Genes and Development 12, 806–819.
Xu, C., Inokuma, M.S., Denham, J., Golds, K., Kundu, P., Gold,
J.D., Carpenter, M.K., 2001. Feeder-free growth of undifferenti-
ated human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotechnology 19, 971–
974.
Xu, C., Police, S., Rao, N., Carpenter, M.K., 2002. Characterization
and enrichment of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic
stem cells. Circulation Research 91, 501–508.