comparison of isradipine and nifedipine in chronic stable angina
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal o/ Curdioloa, 18 (1988) 15-26
Elsevier 15
IJC 00608
Comparison of isradipine and nifedipine in chronic stable angina
Clive E. Handler *. Eric Rosenthal, Demetrius Tsagadopoulos
and Yusuf Najm
Department of Cardiolog~~, Gtg’s Hospttal. London. U.K.
(Received 1 April 1987: rewsion accepted 23 June 1987)
Handler CE, Rosenthal E, Tsagadopoulos D. Najm Y. Comparison of isradipine
and nifedipine in chronic stable angina. Int J Cardiol 1988;18:15-26.
Isradipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, was compared to nifedipine in the treatment of 11 male patients with angina and coronary artery disease in a
randomised, double-blind cross-over study. Patients received 5 mg nifedipine three times a day rising to 20 mg three times a day in three dosage increments over six weeks or 2.5 mg isradipine three times a day rising to 7.5 mg three times a day in
three dosage increments over six weeks, and then received the alternate preparation.
There were no significant differences between the drugs in terms of the frequency
and severity of angina attacks or the consumption of glyceryl trinitrate. The increases
in systolic blood pressure and the double product during exercise were significantly less with isradipine than with nifedipine. There was a similar trend in heart rates.
There was no difference between the treatments in respect of exercise induced ST-segment depression or diastolic blood pressure.
We conclude that isradipine and nifedipine have similar anti-angina1 effects and
that isradipine may be a useful new anti-angina1 agent.
Key words: Isradipine; Nifedipine; Calcium blocker: Angina pectoris; Exercise testing; Statistics
Introduction
Calcium antagonists have a broad spectrum of therapeutic effects and similar but not identical modes of action in the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris [l].
Correspondence to: Dr. Clive E. Handler, M.D.. Department of Cardiology. Middlesex Hospital. London WlN 8AA. U.K.
* Present address: Department of Cardiology. Middlesex Hospital, London WlN 8AA. U.K.
0167-5273/88/$03.50 0 1988 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Biomedical Division)
16
lsradipine
Fig. 1.
Although widely used, the most appropriate choice of calcium antagonist for the majority of patients with angina is at present unclear.
Nifedipine is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist which reduces symptoms of
angina, improves haemodynamics and exercise tolerance and reduces electrocardio-
graphic signs of myocardial ischaemia [2-61. Isradipine (Sandoz) is a new dihydro-
pyridine calcium antagonist (Fig. 1). We have previously studied the effects of isradipine at rest and during exercise in 12 patients with angina and coronary artery
disease. In this single-blind study, increasing doses of isradipine (2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg) were given on 4 consecutive days and the patients were assessed clinically, with
biochemical and haematological tests and with symptom-limited treadmill exercise
testing. No serious side effects were reported by the patients and biochemical and
haematological tests were normal. Isradipine did not produce any deleterious effects
on blood pressure either at rest or during exercise [7]. The aim of this study was to compare isradipine and nifedipine in patients with
chronic stable angina pectoris and documented coronary artery disease.
Methods
Patients
Twelve male patients aged between 48 and 66 years entered the study. One
patient with abnormal laboratory data on entry was excluded before taking the trial medication. It was not considered necessary to replace this patient since the design
of the study permitted satisfactory statistical inference from a study group of 11
patients. All patients had angina (Canadian Heart Association class 2 or 3) present for at least 9 months. All patients were taking nitrates, 9 were taking calcium antagonists and 7 patients were taking a beta-blocker before the study. Exercise-in- duced reversible myocardial ischaemia had been demonstrated in several previous treadmill exercise tests in every case and so all the patients were familiar with the exercise test procedures. Two patients had suffered a previous myocardial infarc- tion. All patients had coronary artery disease confirmed by coronary arteriography.
17
No patient had unstable symptoms, a myocardial infarction within six months of start of the trial, cardiac valve disease. heart failure, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, any conduction abnormalities, other major systemic disease, or other disease precluding exercise testing.
All patients gave informed consent and the trial protocol was approved by the Hospital Ethical Committee.
Study Design
A randomised double-blind crossover design was employed. So far as possible there was a wash-out period of two weeks immediately prior to the study during
which patients were to take no medication other than glyceryl trinitrate. Patients received 2.5 mg isradipine three times a day for 2 weeks, then 5 mg three times a day for 2 weeks, and 7.5 mg three times a day for the final 2 weeks, or 5 mg nifedipine
three times a day for 2 weeks, then 10 mg three times a day for 2 weeks, then 20 mg three times a day for the final 2 weeks. Five patients received nifedipine first, then
isradipine; six patients received the opposite sequence. The doses of isradipine were based on previous work [7], those for nifedipine cover the dose range commonly
used in this type of patient. During the study period patients took glyceryl trinitrate
only to abort attacks of angina, not prophylactically. No other cardiac medication was to be taken. Double dummy techniques were used with placebo capsules to
ensure “blindness” to treatment. The patients included in this study had moderate to severe angina. Since
nifedipine has been shown in several placebo controlled studies to improve clinical,
haemodynamic and exercise test responses [2-61, no placebo control was used in
this study. Assessments were carried out immediately before the study and after each
two-week treatment period. On each occasion a physical examination of each
patient was carried out. A count was made of the number and severity of angina attacks and the number of glyceryl trinitrate tablets taken during the preceding two
weeks, This information was obtained from diary cards. All medication taken and any adverse reactions were also recorded. Before entry to the study, and at the end
of each six-week treatment phase, blood samples were taken for biochemical and
haematological screening. Symptom-limited treadmill exercise tests were carried out at each assessment.
The Naughton protocol was used, in which the myocardial oxygen consumption rate increases by approximately one metabolic equivalent (being approximately a myocardial oxygen consumption rate of 3.5 ml/kg per minute for a 70-kg man
supine at rest) with each stage [8]. Two exercise tests were performed at the same time of day. at least two hours after the last meal, and at least one hour after the last glyceryl trinitrate capsule. No study medication was taken within the two hours
prior to the exercise tests. To eliminate the known physiological improvement on a second test [9], data were taken from the second test only, the first serving as a “warm up”. All exercise tests were supervised by the same physician throughout the
studv.
18
A twelve-lead electrocardiogram, heart rate and cuff blood pressure were recorded at rest immediately before the exercise test, at the time of onset of angina, at maximum exercise, immediately post exercise and five minutes post exercise. An
oscilloscope displaying a three-channel rhythm strip was monitored continuously.
Indications for terminating exercise were severe angina, severe dyspnoea or fatigue,
serious arrhythmias (ventricular ectopic beats more frequent than 20 per minute. multifocal ventricular ectopic beats, ventricular couplets or ventricular tachycardia),
or a fall in blood pressure of more than 25 mm Hg. The times to onset of angina and to termination of exercise, and the reason for terminating the exercise test, were
recorded. ST-segment depression was measured in the lead showing the greatest
shift. The electrocardiogram was also recorded at one-minute intervals during the recovery period after exercise.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical tests were carried out on the changes from the pre-study values. Significance levels quoted are in all cases to P < 0.05.
The data are derived from repeated measurement of two groups of patients. The
common practice of employing repeated tests without correction at each assessment point is incorrect and has been avoided where possible. Where the data were
normally distributed according to the Wilk-Shapiro test [lo] an analysis of variance
for a repeated measures design has been employed [ll]. Subjects were grouped according to the order in which the drugs were given. The actual treatment received and the two weeks of treatment were included as trial factors. For some exercise test
data, the assessment point of the exercise test was incorporated as an additional trial factor. Where significant effects were detected, the contributing factors were sought using a priori r-tests with error terms corrected for the dependence structure within
the data. For data which were not normally distributed, namely the frequency and severity
of angina attacks, the consumption of glyceryl trinitrate and the ST-segment depression, median rather than mean values have been quoted in the relevant tables. No similar analysis of variance approach for non-parametric data is available. In these cases, therefore, comparisons were made at the end of each six week treatment
period using the Wilcoxon test [12] without further correction.
Results
The 11 patients who commenced taking the study medication completed the study. All patients progressed to the highest dose of each medication. One patient received the highest nifedipine dose for one week only. suffering severe headaches, and took the medium dose (10 mg three times a day) for the final week of this phase. This patient subsequently commenced isradipine treatment at the ap-
propriate time and completed the trial without further difficulty. He took the medium dose of nifedipine (10 mg three times a day) for the final week.
19
TABLE 1
Frequency and severity of attacks of angina, and consumption of glyceryl trinitrate.
Nifedipine Nifedipine Nifedipine Isradipine Isradipine Isradipine
Week 0 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6
Total of angina attacks
Median 12.0 5.0 4.0
Mean 16.9 15.4 16.0
SEM 3.4 5.8 7.0
n 11 11 11
Seventy of angina attacks
Median 2.0 1.0 1.0
Mean 1.8 1.7 1.4
SEM 0.2 0.3 0.2
n 11 11 I1
Total of g!vcetyl trinitrate tablets taken Median 3.0 1.0 1.0
Mean 28.6 8.5 10.1
SEM 15.9 4.7 6.3
n 9 10 9
3.0 7.0 2.0 5.0
15.3 17.9 14.1 14.9
7.2 7.3 8.4 7.0
11 11 11 11
1.0
1.3
0.3
10
0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5
8.8 10.3 5.2 6.9
4.8 5.8 3.3 4.3
10 10 10 10
1.0
1.3
0.1
11
1.0
1.2
0.3
10
1.0
1.5
0.3
10
One patient who refused glyceryl trinitrate is not included in the summary statistics. Scoring: 0 = absent,
1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. 4 = intolerable.
Attacks of Angina and Consumption of Glgceryl Trinitrate
The frequency and severity of angina attacks, and the consumption of glyceryl
trinitrate are shown in Table 1. There was a reduction in the median severity and
number of angina attacks and the number of glyceryl trinitrate tablets taken compared to the pre-study measurement. There was no significant difference
between the two drugs in this respect.
Exercise Test Data
The increase in systolic blood pressure during exercise was significantly less during isradipine treatment than during nifedipine treatment (Table 2). There was a
significant increase in diastolic blood pressure over the first four weeks of the study. irrespective of whether nifedipine or isradipine was being taken, with no significant
difference between the two treatments. Nor was there any overall difference between the treatments in relation to heart rate, although on two occasions the exercise-induced increase in heart rate was significantly less with isradipine. The elevation in the double product during exercise, and by implication the myocardial
oxygen consumption, was significantly less with isradipine than nifedipine overall. The time to onset of angina and the total exercise duration are shown in Table 3.
Both increased with the study medication in relation to pre-study values, with no
significant differences between the treatments. However. the time to termination of
20
exercise was longer in the early weeks of the patients’ second treatment, irrespective
of what that treatment was. No significant differences were detected in respect of
ST-segment depression at any time.
TABLE 2
Exercise test.
Nifedipine Nifedipine Nifedipine Isradipine Isradipine Isradipine
Week 0 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6
Systolic blood pressure - summary data (mm Hgigi Pre-exercise
Mean 128.6 124.5 121.8 122.7
SEM 6.1 5.3 4.1 5.8
n 11 11 11 11
Onset of angina
Mean 156.4 158.6 162.3 155.5
SEM 5.4 6.8 6.2 6.9
n 11 11 11 11
Maximum exercise
Mean 162.7 165.0 171.4 163.6
SEM 6.3 7.2 7.8 5.1
n 11 11 11 11
Immediately post-exercise
Mean 160.0 160.9 164.5 157.3
SEM 8.1 7.6 7.4 8.0
n 11 11 11 11
Five minutes post-exercise
Mean 134.1 132.7 123.2 125.9
SEM 6.5 6.8 8.0 5.4
n 11 11 11 11
Diastolic blood pressure - summar?, data (mm Hg) Pre-exercise
Mean 81.4 82.7 80.5 76.4
SEM 3.2 3.3 2.4 2.5
n 11 11 11 11
Onset of angina
Mean 81.8 82.3 80.0 78.2
SEM 3.4 4.2 3.0 3.4
n 11 11 11 11
Maximum exercise
Mean 82.3 81.8 80.0 77.3
SEM 2.9 3.6 1.9 4.2
n 11 11 11 11
Immediately post-exercise
Mean 79.5 79.5 77.3 77.7
SEM 3.0 3.0 2.7 4.2
n 11 11 11 11
Five minutes post-exercise
Mean 80.5 80.5 76.8 73.6
SEM 4.0 3.1 3.2 1.5
n 11 11 11 11
120.0 120.9 119.1
5.0 4.0 3.9
11 11 11
160.5 158.2 146.8
7.0 6.1 7.0
11 11 11
161.4 156.4 160.0
6.9 5.4 4.8 11 11 11
157.3 151.8 150.9
7.0 5.1 5.9
11 11 11
125.0 120.1 125.5
5.2 4.3 3.5
11 11 10
17.7
1.9
11
79.5
3.5
11
75.0
2.2
11
82.7 80.9 79.1
3.0 3.7 2.6
11 11 11
82.3 84.5 79.1
4.8 3.3 2.3
11 11 11
80.0 82.3 76.4
5.0 2.8 2.6
11 11 11
74.9 74.1 71.0
2.6 3.1 2.2
11 11 11
21
TABLE 2 (continued)
Nifedipine Nifedipine Nifedipine Isradipine Isradipine Isradipine
Week 0 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6
Heart rate - summay data (beats/min)
Pre-exercise
Mean 86.8 86.6 85.0
SEM 4.1 5.6 4.3
n 11 11 11
Onset of angina
Median
Mean 127.3 127.3 128.1
SEM 6.1 4.7 5.9
n 11 11 11
Maximum exercise
Mean 136.5 137.0 139.4
SEM 6.0 5.5 6.5
n 11.0 11 11
Immediately post-exercise
Mean 127.7 133.2 133.3
SEM 6.2 6.4 6.3
n 11 11 11
Five minutes post-exercise
Mean 89.0 89.8 89.6
SEM 4.9 5.2 4.8
n 11 11 11
Double product - summary data ( X IO’) Pre-exercise
Mean 112.1 108.8 103.5
SEM 8.0 9.4 6.1
” 11.0 11.0 11.0
Onset of angina
Mean 199.9 202.6 208.7
SEM 12.5 11.9 13.1
n 11.0 11.0 11.0
Maximum exercise
Mean 223.0 226.8 238.1
SEM 13.9 13.5 13.4
n 11.0 11.0 11.0
Immediately post-exercise
Mean 206.8 215.4 219.1
SEM 16.3 15.6 12.5
” 11.0 11.0 11.0
Five minutes post-exercise
Mean 122.1 120.1 112.4
SEM 12.4 10.2 12.8
n 11.0 11.0 11.0
85.8 83.3 87.2 84.9
3.8 4.1 4.1 4.7
11 11 11 II
132.0
131.2
4.5
11
124.8 127.5 127.0
5.0 4.1 5.2
11 11 11
142.3 134.9 135.1 136.5
5.3 5.0 5.2 5.5
11 11 11 11
133.6 129.6 129.8 129.4
6.7 5.3 5.2 6.3
11 11 11 11
87.7 91.0 87.2 89.7
3.5 5.3 3.3 4.7
11 11 11 10
105.6 100.6 106.1 101.6
7.1 7.2 7.0 7.2
11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
204.8 201.7 203.3 189.4
12.6 13.7 12.6 15.3
11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
233.4 217.4 210.7 219.8
12.4 11.6 9.9 12.2
11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
212.3 203.7 196.3 197.4
17.9 12.3 8.6 14.2
11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
111.2 114.3 105.2 113.4
7.8 8.8 6.3 8.0
11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0
In all cases the reason for terminating the exercise test was angina or angina and fatigue combined. Several patients were also short of breath. Six patients recorded arrhythmias during exercise testing at some stage of the study, none had serious
22
TABLE 3
Exercise test.
Nifedipine Nifedipine Nifedipine Isradipine Isradipine Isradipine Week 0 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6
Time to onset of angina Median 300.0 630.0 612.5 Mean 426.4 602.7 641.0 SEM 77.6 89.6 122.5 ,1 11 11 10
Time to terminatton of exercise (seconds) Median 540.0 900.0 1020.0 Mean 625.3 837.5 921.3 SEM 72.9 101.5 100.8 ,* 11 11 11
645.0 642.0 758.0 830.0 665.6 633.1 708.5 688.0 97.6 19.3 88.4 89.7 11 11 11 11
960.0 780.0 840.0 960.0 943.6 837.1 889.1 912.3 101.1 72.9 81.1 84.5 11 11 11 11
ventricular arrhythmias during or after exercise. There was no apparent difference between the type and number of arrhythmias recorded with either medication.
Adverse Effects (Table 4)
One patient who refused glyceryl trinitrate therapy felt generally ill throughout. Four patients felt generally well, one of whom had a short (two-day) period of depression whilst taking isradipine. The most common complaint was of headaches.
One patient had headaches during both treatment phases, three others had headaches
only during nifedipine treatment. One patient felt depressed during nifedipine treatment. Two patients reported gastrointestinal problems, one with nifedipine and
one with isradipine. One patient reported shortage of breath, and another a feeling
of nervousness with isradipine. The majority of haematological and biochemical values were normal, with the
exception of triglyceride levels, which were generally high for most patients, and cholesterol levels which were high in approximately one half of the patients at some
stage of the study.
Discussion
The frequency of attacks of angina and the consumption of glyceryl trinitrate are essential aspects of the evaluation of anti-angina1 drugs [13]. In this study we observed no significant difference between isradipine and nifedipine in respect of
these parameters. Two main patterns of response were evident from the exercise tests. Firstly, the
time to onset of angina and the time to termination of exercise increased signifi- cantly in the early stages of the first treatment period, irrespective of treatment. This is consistent with the appearance of a training effect, observed in other studies [14,15]. The diastolic blood pressure behaved similarly, levelling off during the
TA
BL
E
4
Patie
nts’
co
mpl
aint
s.
Patie
nt
num
ber
Wee
k 0
Nif
edip
ine
Nif
edip
ine
Nif
edip
ine
PN
200-
110
PN
200-
l 10
PN
20
0-I
10
wee
k 2
wee
k 4
wee
k 6
wee
k 2
wee
k 4
wee
k 6
Nife
dipi
nejir
st,
then
isr
adip
ine
1 of
f co
lour
,
gene
rally
ill
4 m
arve
llous
,
wel
l
6 no
t to
o ba
d
very
w
ell
inde
ed
not
good
rotte
n,
very
ba
d
norm
al
head
-
ache
ea
rly
mor
ning
not
too
bad
very
w
ell
inde
ed
som
e an
gina
at
rest
, ge
nera
lly
off-
colo
ur
very
lim
ited,
ge
nera
lly
awfu
l
feel
s as
if
espe
cial
ly
firs
t
hung
-ove
r fe
w
days
not
bad,
head
ache
in
mor
ning
very
w
ell,
last
w
eek
bad:
head
ache
s an
d
gidd
ines
s on
high
do
se
2 hr
af
ter
med
icat
ion
not
too
bad
at
all
very
w
ell
angi
na
at
rest
,
up
and
dow
n
seve
re
face
fl
ushi
ng,
pain
ful
glan
ds
righ
t si
de
neck
feel
ing
wel
l
quite
ba
d an
gina
no c
hang
e.
swol
len
hand
s.
burn
ing,
nu
mb
little
fi
nger
very
w
ell
very
go
od
feel
s fi
t
mor
e sh
ort
of
brea
th
bad
very
w
ell
fain
ted
once
,
stom
ach
cram
ps,
hear
tbur
n,
off
food
wel
l
pret
ty
good
no
fl
ushi
ng.
feel
s ve
ry
wel
l
very
w
ell
very
w
ell
inde
ed
in s
pite
of
bout
s of
ang
ina
som
e fa
ir
days
,
othe
rs
very
sh
ort
of
brea
th
11
quite
go
od
slig
ht
head
ache
imm
ed.
afte
r
med
icat
ion
Isra
dipi
ne f
irst
, th
en n
ifed
ipin
e 2
not
too
bad,
fair
ly
wel
l
3 no
t ba
d
9 10
12
very
w
ell
exce
pt
for
last
2
days
OK
, w
ell
OK
no
t to
o ba
d
not
as g
ood
as
last
2
wee
ks
tingl
ing
in
feet
i hr
af
ter
tabl
ets
bad
head
ache
wel
l no
t br
ight
head
ache
,
arm
-ach
e
unre
late
d
to e
xerc
ise,
tingl
ing
in
feet
la
st
few
da
ys
rece
nt
cold
,
not
too
bad
bloa
ted
stom
ach
afte
r ta
blet
s,
hot
feet
an
d
ankl
es,
unw
ell,
depr
esse
d,
but
ofte
n so
head
ache
be
tter
wel
l, fe
els
nerv
y an
d
jum
py
very
w
ell
very
w
ell
inde
ed
grea
t
bette
r ge
nera
lly
ill,
hot
feet
wel
l, fe
els
shak
y
gene
rally
O
K,
2
bad
days
of
depr
essi
on
quite
w
ell
1st
wee
k fe
lt aw
ful,
impr
oved
ex
cept
he
adac
hes,
w
ind,
le
ft
head
ache
, la
st
few
da
ys
last
fe
w
days
, le
g pu
ffed
up
ve
ry
wel
l fe
lt pe
culia
r
for
few
da
ys
swea
ting
last
w
eek,
ve
ry
wel
l
has
had
cold
sinc
e ye
ster
day
wor
st
2 w
eeks
co
ld
wea
ther
in a
lon
g tim
e an
gina
at
each
w
alk.
mai
nly
even
ings
wel
l. av
oids
ve
ry
heav
y fe
lt tir
ed.
exer
tion
lot
of w
ork
occa
sion
al
gidd
ines
s,
pret
ty
fair
head
ache
s
OK
pret
ty
fair
OK
pret
ty
fair
25
second treatment phase. Secondly, significant differences were detected between nifedipine and isradipine, whatever the order of treatment. Systolic blood pressure increased during exercise, the increase being significantly less with isradipine than
with nifedipine. There was a slight indication that heart rates behaved similarly. Consequently the increase in the double product during exercise was also signifi- cantly less with isradipine than with nifedipine. Since the double product is an
approximate measure of myocardial oxygen consumption [16], the presumption is
that there is a smaller increase in myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise with isradipine than with nifedipine at the doses employed here. This may have
clinical relevance in these patients.
Nifedipine acutely reduces left ventricular afterload by peripheral vasodilation, and increases cardiac output with a corresponding decrease in myocardial oxygen
consumption [17]. It may exert a negative inotropic effect [18], particularly in patients with impaired left ventricular function [19]. This may produce a reflex increase in heart rate. These are not consistent findings and we did not find that
either drug produced deleterious effects on blood pressure at rest or during exercise. The haemodynamic effects of nifedipine reported here are consistent with previous
studies [3,4,6]. Nifedipine has been reported to reduce myocardial oxygen consump-
tion [4] and to increase coronary artery blood flow [20]. The present data do not
permit firm conclusions to be drawn, but the similarity of the clinical response to isradipine and nifedipine suggests a similar mode of action.
In this small patient study group, we could not detect any significant difference in either clinical or exercise test variables between isradipine and nifedipine. Isradipine appears to merit further investigation.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. Edgar Sowton for his constructive criticism of the manuscript, to Dr. M.I. Foreman of Data Analysis and Research (D.A.R.) Ltd., for
the statistical analysis, and to Sandoz Ltd. for supplying the trial medication. C.E.H. is grateful to the Medical Research Council for support during this study.
References
1 Braunwald E. Mechanism of action of calcium channel blocking agents. N Engl J Med
1982;307:1618-1627.
2 Lynch P, Dargie H. Krikler S. Krikler D. Objective assessment of anti-angina1 treatment: a
double-blind comparison of propranolol, nifedipine and their combination. Br Med J 1980;281:184-187.
3 Mueller HS, Chahine RA. Interim report of multicentre. double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of
nifedipine in chronic stable angina. Am J Med 1981;71:645-657.
4 Sherman LG, Liang C-S. Nifedipine in chronic stable angina: a double-blind placebo controlled
crossover trial. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:706-711.
5 Chaitman BR. Wagniart P, Pastemac A, Brevers G, Scholl J-M. Improved exercise tolerance after
propranolol, diltiazem or nifedipine in angina pectoris: comparison at 1, 3 and 8 hours and
correlation with plasma drug concentrations. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:1-9.
26
6 Higginbotham MB, Morris KG, Coleman RE, Cobb FR. Comparison of nifedipine alone and with
propranolol alone for stable angina pectoris including hemodynamics at rest and during exercise. Am
J Cardiol 1986;57:1022-1028.
7 Handler CE, Sowton E. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of PN 200-110, a new calcium antagonist, in
patients with angina and coronary heart disease. Em J Clin Pharmacol 1984:27:415-417.
8 Naughton J, Sevelius G, Balke B. Physiological responses of normal and pathological subjects to a
modified work capacity test. J Sports Med 1963;3:201-207.
9 Burkhart F, Barold S, Sowton E. Hemodynamic effects of repeated exercise. Am J Cardiol
1967;75:509-515. 10 Dunn OJ, Clark VA. Applied statistics: analysis of variance and regression. New York: John Wiley.
1974.
11 Winer BJ. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.
12 Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: John Wiley, 1971.
13 Parisi AF, Strauss WE, McIntyre KM, Sasahara AA. Considerations in evaluating new anti-angina1
drugs. Circulation 1982;65(suppl 1):138-142.
14 Smokler PE, MacAlpine RN, Alvaro A, Kattus AA. Reproducibility of a multi-stage near maximal
treadmill test for exercise tolerance in angina pectoris. Circulation 1973;48:346-351.
15 Hossack KF, Bruce RA. Improved exercise performance in persons receiving diltiazem. Am J Cardiol
1981;47:95-101. 16 Detry J-MR, Piette F, Brasseur LA. Hemodynamic determinants of exercise ST-segment depression
in coronary patients. Circulation 1970;42:593-599.
17 Henry PD. Comparative pharmacology of calcium antagonists: nifedipine. verapamil and diltiazem.
Am J Cardiol 1980;46:1047-1058.
18 Banzet 0, Colin JN, Thibonnier M. Singlas E, Alexandre JM, Corvol P. Acute antihypertensive effect
and pharmacokinetics of a tablet preparation of nifedipine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1983:24:145-150.
19 Ludbrook PA, Tiefenbnmn AJ, Reed FR, Sobel BE. Acute hemodynamic responses to sublingual
nifedipine: dependence on left ventricular function. Circulation 1982;65:489-498.
20 Zacca NM, Verani MS. Chahine RA, Miller RR. Effect of nifedipine on exercise induced left
ventricular dysfunction and myocardial hypoperfusion in stable angina. Am J Cardiol
1982:50:689-695.