collection directions: some reflections on the future of library stewardship
DESCRIPTION
Keynote presentation at Boston Library Consortium Annual Networking Day, Boston College, 3 June 2014TRANSCRIPT
Some reflections on libraries and stewardship of the scholarly record
Constance Malpas
Program Officer, OCLC Research
3 June 2014, Boston College
BLC Networking Day
Collection Directions
1
Inside-out
Outside-in
3
Collection Directions: Academic Libraries
Low Stewardship
High Stewardship
In few collections
In many collections
Collections Grid
Research & Learning Materials
Open Web ResourcesPurchased MaterialsLicensed E-Resources
Special CollectionsLocal Digitization
Licensed
PurchasedOutside-in
Inside-out
Dempsey & Childress, OCLC Research
Institutional Needs – Academic Libraries: Current situation vs. 5 years from now
Low Stewardship
High Stewardship
In few collections
In many collections
Licensed
Purchased
Key Trends:• increased reliance on group provisioning of print and licensed content• more integration of freely available web-based content• special collections focus on institutional mission, reputation• growing attention to teaching/learning materials; limited library capacity
Institutional Needs – Research Libraries: Current situation vs. 5 years from now
Low Stewardship
High Stewardship
In few collections
In many collections
Licensed
Purchased
Key Trends:• strategic realignment around purchasing/licensing ‘collections as services’• redirection of investment toward reputation management, research support• emphasis on effective disclosure of distinctive assets: special collections, research data, expertise
7
A landscape in transition
• Fragmentation in higher education sector (elite, convenience, ‘squeezed middle’) will drive changes in academic libraries – increased differentiation in portfolio of collections and services
• Shared infrastructure enabling transition from local- to group-scale management of purchased and licensed content
• Institutional capacity to redirect resources from commodity collections toward distinctive services will depend on availability of appropriate cooperative infrastructure
8
Collective collection: print books
9
31%90%
North American Print Book Landscape, January 2011
US libraries hold
90% of titles in North American print book collection
10
North American Mega-regions
12 zones of highly integrated economic activity
• Does distribution of library resource align with distribution of economic activity?• What are the implications for stewardship of North American print book collections?
11
Relative size of regional print book collections (2011)
92% of North American print book collection concentrated in 12 mega-regions
12
Inventory continues
to grow in all regions
Median +3% between 2011 and
2013
+4% growth in
Bos-Wash
13
• Largest mega-regional print book resource in North America
• 27.9M print book titles; 56% of North American print book resource
• 199.6M library holdings; 22% of North American print book inventory
• Avg. 7 in-region library holdings per title
• 75% of titles held by <5 libraries in region*
• 33% of titles are unique to region*
Bos-Wash print book collection (2013)
*based on 2011 data
14
Bos-Wash Coverage of other Regional Collections (2011)
Bos-Wash regional resource duplicates 65-95% of print book titles in other regions
…next largest regional collection can duplicate just 50% of Bos-Wash collection
15
Bos-Wash Institutional Infrastructure (2011)
• >4000 holding libraries• Top 5 libraries account for 15-34% of titles (each)
Academic libraries account for >70% of regional inventory
16
Group-scale: Boston Library Consortium
17
17 librariesLiberal arts colleges, professional schools, research institutions, state library . . .
• all affiliates of FCLD print journal archive• many (all?) participating in Eastern Academic Scholars Trust
Right scale for stewardship is…small consortium? Large, loose confederation?
18
Largest print book
collectionin BLC is
>100X greater
than smallestcollection
19
Median BLC member ‘coverage’of Bos-Wash
collection
is 2%
‘coveragerequires
cooperation’
20
Median NERL
member ‘coverage’of Bos-Wash
collection
is 5%‘coverage
requires
cooperation’
21
At every scale…
ChiPitts
58%
SoCal
47%
Charlanta 67%
coverage requires collaboration
regional coverage
22
>266M library holdings in WorldCat
Shared Print Collections
• Cooperative stewardship of aggregate print resource
• Part of broader trend toward ‘group-scale’ library operations
• >30 active shared print groups in North America
• 9 major groups registering shared print holdings in WorldCat
Shared Print Titles in WorldCat April 2014
23
Boston College
Williams College
U Mass Amherst
Median duplicati
on
23% as of May
2013
24
Stewardship of the Evolving Scholarly Record
25
Format transition:Print-centric to digital, networked
Boundaries blurring: Articles/monographs, but also research data, computer models, video, blogs, visualizations, conference posters & presentations, pre-prints, etc.
Stakeholder roles reconfiguring: New paths for the scholarly communication ‘supply chain’
Scholarly record
26
Stewardship of the scholarly record
Create
Fix
Use
Collect
Factors impacting stewardship …• Increasing volume of content• Increasing diversity/complexity of content• Increasing distribution of custodial
responsibility
‘local copies’ of scholarly record are increasingly partial discovery and management are increasingly fragmented coherence of scholarly record is reduced
27
Questions for academic library consortia• Is available cooperative infrastructure
adequate to support deeper collaboration around collections management, custodial care of scholarly record?
• Do existing consortia represent the right mix of stakeholders for collaborative stewardship arrangements?
• How can consortial efforts ‘scale up’ to meet system-wide stewardship needs? What mechanisms are needed to federate group-scale approaches?
Thanks for your attention.
©2014 OCLC. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Suggested attribution: “This work uses content from [presentation title] © OCLC, used under a Creative Commons Attribution license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/”
[email protected]@ConstanceM
28