cognitive model of the epistemologies

7/30/2019 Cognitive Model of the Epistemologies

1/4

Cognitive model of the epistemologies:the experience of codification.

Ferdinand Phatykh ( 1997-2013. ERGONICA CENTRE Ltd, Moscow), E-mail:

[email protected]

Abstract: Based on the analysis of Knowledge Representation Paradigm of theNature, Society and Individuality under the perspective of "cognitive metaphor" theKnowledge System Codification in a form of " The Epistemologies Table" is proposed.It helps to construct the integrated approach for the metaknowledge classification.

That is a necessary paradigm, in the "structurating" frames of which theinvestigating objects may be represented, the purposes of project may beformulated, researches and applications may be coordinated.

Keywords: Epistemologies Table, Representational Paradigm, Cognitive Metaphor,Metaknowledge, Congruence (Methodical, Subject, Projection).

To the attention of the expert researchers community in the "cognitive metaphor"field of application of modern science is proposed the scheme ("Epistemologies

Table"), which, in our view, structures systematically the space of scientificresearch in a wide range. A conditional "dimensions" of the space are the Object (theobject, discipline, discourse) and its representational paradigm (positivistic, semiotic-language system, "individuated" (subjective)), see Table 1. Epistemologies Table.Epistemologies names correspond to the areas of the knowledge, which is defined bythe object representation paradigm ("construct"), although at this moment of theirnomination fairly conventional. On the base of this classification has placed "amodern cognitive scheme of the cognitive processes, in one form or another

element codifies a "subjectivity" of the knowledge.Table 1. Epistemologies Table.

Subject||

Representation paradigm

Nature Society Individuality/men

Positivist -pragmatic

System -probability laws

and models in thelanguage ofmathematics

Fractal-synergies andreflexive-game

models

Intellectual andConstructivist

models

Discursive andLinguistic

Disciplines in scalePositivist -Creationist"

Cultural andIdeological discourses

and legitimating

Hermeneutic-discip-linarydiscourses

Religious andva-lue-"individuated"

"World view"typologies

Social-Roleindividualized

discourse

Individuatedsuperdiskurs

Applied purpose of using "table epistemologies" - codification / classification

metaknowledge as necessary paradigm in structuring within which represents theobject under study, formulate goals of project tasks, coordinated research andapplications.
http://ru.scribd.com/fphatykhmailto:[email protected]://ru.scribd.com/fphatykhmailto:[email protected]


2/4

The main advantage of this codification - the ability to integrate a very wide rangeof efforts of many agents, "production of knowledge" by a kind of "meta-language ofthe new" cognitive processes. Proposed above is only the first step in thedevelopment and use of a new "cognitive resources". [1,2].

Rules codification (as systems of representations of subject and problem areas inthe form of models, disciplines and discourses) table-based epistemology:

1. Establishment of facilities and representation paradigms for Themes(Methodological congruence).

2. Structuring of the source data and knowledge on the paradigmatic features(system-subject congruence).

3. Comparison of the requirements for the "exit" of the project to the results of thefirst two of the above rules (Project congruence).

Conclusions:

The above proposed approach to the "epistemologies systematizing" can be usefulfor the cognitive-oriented researchers in the methodological, technique and applied

aspects.We will be happy to further cooperation in the concrete projects!

References:

1. Matthew Jelavic. Socio-Technical Knowledge Management and EpistemologicalParadigms: Theoretical Connections at the Individual and Organisational Level.//Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management Volume 6,2011, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.http://www.ijikm.org/Volume6/IJIKMv6p001-016Jelavic508.pdf

2. .. . // . . (. . ), 2(18),

2012, .5-12.

In Russian

:

.

167.7:165.194/.433/.7/.8 + 316.259/.258/.276/.277/.286

. , " "

" ".

,

,

, .

: , , " ", , (, - , ).


3/4

( -), ,

,

.

(, , )

(, -,

()), . 1. .

, - (),

.

,

.

1. .

/

-

-

- -

-

-

-

-

-

--

,-

-

/ ,

,

,

. [1, 2].

.

.

( , ) :

1. ( ).

2.

(- ).3. ( ).


4/4

:

- , .

!

:

1. Matthew Jelavic. Socio-Technical Knowledge Management and EpistemologicalParadigms: Theoretical Connections at the Individual and Organisational Level.//Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management Volume 6,2011, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.http://www.ijikm.org/Volume6/IJIKMv6p001-016Jelavic508.pdf

2. .. . //

. . (. . ), 2(18),2012, .5-12.

Ferdinand Phatykh ( 1997-2013. ERGONICA CENTRE Ltd, Moscow), E-mail:

[email protected]
http://ru.scribd.com/fphatykhmailto:[email protected]://ru.scribd.com/fphatykhmailto:[email protected]

cognitive model of the epistemologies

Documents