clouds and climate through a soda straw
DESCRIPTION
Clouds and Climate Through a Soda Straw. Mark Miller. Earth’s Radiation 288 K. Sun’s Radiation 6000 K. Quantity of Radiation. Visible. Infrared. 3. 10. 0.5. Wavelength (micrometers). Visible Satellite Photo. Infrared Satellite Image. Source: NASA/ Earth Radiation Budget Experiment. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Clouds and Climate Through
a Soda Straw
Mark Miller
Visible
Infrared
Sun’s Radiation6000 K
Earth’s Radiation288 K
0.5 3 10
Wavelength (micrometers)
Qua
ntit
y o f
Ra d
iati
on
Visible Satellite Photo
Infrared Satellite Image
Source: NASA/ Earth Radiation Budget Experiment
“The study of climate and climate change is hindered by
a lack of information on the effect of clouds on the
radiation balance of earth.”
•Ramanathan et al., 1989: Science, 243, 57-62.
Figure 2.10
•IPCC Working Group I (2007)
Representing Clouds in Climate Models
55-N
60-N
172-W 157-W
CLIMATE MODELGRID CELL
WeatherForecastModel Grid Cell
CloudResolvingModels:Less ThanWidthOf Lines
What Cloud Properties Change the Net Radiation Received at the Surface?
1. Amount of the sky that is covered
2. Thickness
3. Composition• Contain ice crystals, liquid water, or both?• Particle sizes?• Particle concentrations?
4. Height in the atmosphere
How Does the Location of Cloud Impact the Surface Temperature?
Low Clouds
Space
~2-km
High Clouds
~10-km
COOLING WARMING
What We Know About Solar Radiation and Clouds
• Solid theoretical foundation for interaction between a single, spherical liquid cloud droplet and sunlight
•Sun
•Cloud Droplet
•Scattered
•Light
What We Know About Solar Radiation and Clouds
• Some theoretical foundation for interaction of sunlight and simple ice crystal shapes
The Real World
What We Wish We Knew About Solar Radiation and Clouds
1. How do we compute the total impact of a huge collection of diverse individual cloud particles?
2. What are the regional differences in cloud composition, coverage, thickness, and location in the atmosphere?
3. If we knew (1) and (2), how do we summarize all of this information so that it can be incorporated into a climate model?
What We Know About Outgoing Terrestrial Radiation and Clouds
• Good theoretical foundation for interaction of terrestrial radiation and cloud water content (liquid clouds).
• Particle:– radius somewhat important in thin liquid clouds
– shape and size somewhat important in high level ice clouds (cirrus)
• Aerosols?
Surface Radiation
Calibration Facility
MeteorologicalTower
Multiple Radars
MultipleLidars
2-kmClouds
Through a SODA
STRAW!
The ARM Southern Great Plains Site
SGPCentral FacilitySODA STRAW
ExtendedMeasurementFacilities
Oklahoma City
Wichita
What types of remote sensors do we use to make cloud measurements?
• Visible and Infrared Sky Imagers• Vertically-Pointing Lasers (LIDARs)
– Measure the height of the lowest cloud base– Below cloud concentrations of aerosol and water vapor– Beam quickly disperses inside cloud
• Cloud Radars– Information about cloud location and composition
• Microwave Radiometers– Measure the total amount of liquid water in atmosphere– Can’t determine location of liquid– Presently not measuring total ice content
Visual Images of the Sky•cloud coverage (versus cloud fraction)
•simple! digitize images and …
•daytime only
•integrated quantity
A Time Series
The Past Few Days in Oklahoma…
…have been for the birds!
3/20/08 3/21/08 3/22/08 3/23/08
•500 nm
•RV Ron Brown
•Central Pacific
•AOT=0.08
•Sea of Japan
•AOT=0.98
•AMF
•Niamey, Niger
•AOT=2.5-3
Sky Imaging
Negligible Return Cloud and Aerosol Particles Cloud droplets
Surface
10-km
20-km
24 Hours
Laser Data from Southern Great Plains
IceClouds
LowClouds
No Signal
7:00 pm 7:00 am 7:00 pmtime
•V=4500m
•V=700m, Mass Concentration=1,700g m-3
Niamey, Niger, Africa
•0000
Negligible
Return
Cloud
Droplets
Cloud
and/or
Aerosol
•0000 •1200•0
•5
•10
•15
•20
Time (UTC)
Hei
gh
t (k
m)
•Biomass Burning•Dust
•LIQUID CLOUDS
•Dust product (upper) and GERB OLR (lower) for 1200UT on 8 March 2006
Cloud
Lake Chad
Dust
Ene
rgy
Ret
urne
d to
Rad
ar
Size of Cloud Particle
At a Given Wavelength
Ene
rgy
Ret
urne
d to
Rad
ar
Radar Wavelength
A Cloud Particle At Different Wavelengths
radius6 wavelength-4
Ene
rgy
Abs
orbe
d by
Atm
osph
ere
Radar Wavelength
35 GHz
94 GHz
MaximumPropagation
Distance
20-30 km
10-15 km
8 mm3.2 mm
The DOE Cloud Radars
Small Cloud Particles Typical Cloud Particles Very Light Precipitation
Surface
10-km
20-km
Cloud Radar Data from Southern Great Plains
Black Dots:Laser MeasurementsOf CloudBase Height
7:00 pm 7:00 am 7:00 pmtime
Small Cloud Particles Typical Cloud Particles Very Light Precipitation
Surface
10-km
20-km
Cloud Radar Data from Southern Great Plains
Black Dots:Laser MeasurementsOf CloudBase Height
ThinClouds
Insects
7:00 pm 7:00 am 7:00 pmtime
Surface
2-km
10-km
Laser Radar
Base
RadarEcho
Top
Base
TopLow
RadarSensitivity
RadarEcho
RadarEcho
MicrowaveRadiometer
Emission
Evolution of Cloud Radar Science
• Cloud Structure and Processes
• Cloud Statistics
• Cloud Composition
Solid Overcast
Cloud Transition
Broken Cloud
Azores
Applications of Surface-Based Cloud Observing Systems
Example: Marine Cloud Transitions
Application of Surface-Based Remote Sensing to a Cloud “Problem”
•Marine Stratocumulus Transition
Ocean Surface
Mid-latitudes Tropics
0.5 km
2 km
Ocean Surface
Mid-latitudes Tropics
0.5 km
2 km
THEORY
OBSERVED
5-km
10-km
15-km
Cloud TopHeight
Probability1% 10%
Tropical Western PacificJan 1999 June 1999
3% 1% 10%3%Probability
Retrieving Liquid Cloud Composition
+
Radar Echo
Intensity
Hei
ght
Total Liquid Water
(Microwave Radiometer)
Particle Size
Num
ber
Mode Radius??
+ =Mode Radius
Hei
ght
Number
Concentration??
Width
Number
Concentration
Hei
ght
7:00 pm 7:00 am 7:00 pm
1 4 10 17 25
Liquid Cloud Particle Mode Radius
Micrometers
Hei
ght (
km)
2
4
6
0time
Active and Passive Cloud Remote Sensors (cont.)
• Wind Profiler – 75-m, 6-min resolution– 915 MHz [1270-1400 MHz COPS]– Minimum Height: 120-m– Maximum height: 5.5-km
• Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI)– 3-19.2 m (1 cm-1 resolution)– 6-min resolution (20-30 sec possible for COPS)– 1.3 degree field-of-view
AERI Spectra
Analysis of the Impact of Clouds on Radiation
Remotely-Sensed Information about Cloud Structure and Composition
Existing Theoretical Models of Radiation Transfer Through Clouds
Compare with Coincident Measurements of the Energy Budget
Compute the Energy Budgets at the Surface andTop-of-Atmosphere
Meteorological Models
• Global Climate Model (GCM)– Forecast Period: Decades to Centuries– Resolution: ~300-km x 300-km– Crude Representations of Many Processes
• Numerical Weather Prediction Model (NWP)– Forecast Period: Hours to a Few Days– Resolution: 29-km x 29-km– Better Representations of Many Processes
• Cloud Resolving Model (CRM)– Forecast Period: Hours– Resolution: 1-km x 1-km– Detailed Representations of Processes
Super-Parameterizations: The Grabowski, Randall, and Arakawa Scheme
55-N
60-N
172-W 157-W
CLIMATE MODELGRID CELL
2-DimensionalCloud Resoving Model
3-DSimulation
5-10 years?
Summary
• Collecting and analyzing large data sets to better understand cloud behavior
• Observations are more compatible with evaluation of cloud resolving models than current GCMs
• New “super-parameterizations” in GCMs appears to be the path forward: 5-10 years– Based on cloud resolving models