classic papers in medical informatics

38
Click to edit Master title style Classic Papers in Medical Informatics Michael Hogarth, MD, FACP Professor, Internal Medicine Professor, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Chair, Health Informatics Graduate Program UC Davis

Upload: mike-hogarth-md-facmi-facp

Post on 22-Jan-2018

115 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Click to edit Master title style

Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Michael Hogarth, MD, FACPProfessor, Internal Medicine

Professor, Pathology and Laboratory MedicineChair, Health Informatics Graduate Program

UC Davis

Page 2: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Objective

• Identify “classic” papers in medical informatics• Considerations– What is meant by ‘classic’?• What metric/measurement

– Author, citation, topic, historical

• Is it the most impactful?• Is it an innovation?

– What is “the discipline”?• Medical informatics, clinical informatics, biomedical

informatics, health informatics, ?

Page 3: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Prior Art

• Characterizing the “impact” of papers and topics is not new

2011

2013

1965

Page 4: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

A classic method: “Impact Factor”

• Journal Impact Factor (JIF) – obtained from the Journal Citation Reports (Thomson Reuters)– “a measure of journal prestige and impact”– Uses the Science Citation Index (SCI), a citation database

originally developed by the Institute for Scientific Information in 1964

– Calculated by dividing the number of citations in the present year by all the articles published in the two prior years

#citations of journal articles this year

#of papers in the journal in the prior 2 years

Page 5: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

A newer method - Eigenfactor

• Eigenfactor ranks the influence of journals using network theory and an approach similar to Google’s PageRank algorithm

• Journals are considered influential if they are cited by other influential journals

(Journal A cites Journal B 4 times)

Page 6: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Are “bibliometrics” a correct metric?

Page 7: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

JAMIA Most Cited

• Earliest article – 1994

• None after

• Only lists JAMIA articles

• Citations counts can change over time – – ?shouldn’t a classic

article remain classic forever?

Page 8: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Most Cited – Journal of Biomedical Informatics

• Only papers since 2010• Only articles from JBI• Citation counts change

with time

http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-biomedical-informatics/most-cited-articles/

Page 9: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Expert searcher vs. Content expert

• Informatics experts asked by AHRQ to create a Health IT “bibliography” of ‘seminal articles’ in 11 categories

• Using the same categories, an expert librarian searcher compiled a list of ‘best’ health informatics articles using information seeking and retrieval tools

• Lists overlapped by only 27%

2009

Page 10: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

So what did I do?

I tossed all that aside...

Page 11: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

My Approach – educator and discipline “expert”

• Authors and Papers– Authors - individuals who were/are influential in the discipline

• Even if they didn’t publish many papers (ie, Morris Collen)• Individuals often noted to be important by myself and my peers

– Papers – Important innovations and/or new knowledge in the discipline

• Classic = “Timeless”– I reached as far back as the beginning of the discipline– Principles in the paper are ‘timeless’ – relevant today as they were

when published

• Discipline– “medical” (clinical) informatics

Page 12: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Some Biases

• I decided to select a “Top 20”– Why not a top 10? – just couldn’t do it...

• Historical articles are being evaluated by me without a personal context (I was not in the discipline before 1995)

Page 13: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

So what are you getting?

• In my opinion, these are papers that every student of medical (clinical) informatics should have read!

• I can’t be wrong – it is my opinion!

Page 14: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics
Page 15: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

1) “Reasoning Foundations of Medical Diagnosis”(Ledley and Lusted, 1959)

• First paper analyzing the reasoning processes inherent in medical diagnosis

• Introduced the use of Bayesian probability and value theory (game theory) as elements in making a medical diagnosis and choosing a therapy

• The paper clearly outlines the derivation of a form of Bayes that can be used to determine the probability that a patient (P) had a disease (f) given a set of symptoms (G)

• Paper also outlines how to use game theory to choose the treatment of greatest value to the patient

Page 16: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Dr. Robert Ledley -- a pioneer

• Physicist and DDS• Pioneered the use of digital

computers in biology and medicine

• First exposed to computer programming through his wife (SAEC)

• Led the development of the Automatic Computerized Transverse Axial (ACTA) scanner...the CT scan!

• National Medal of Technology (1997)

Page 17: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

2) “Computers in Medical Data Processing”(Ledley and Lusted, 1960)

• Outlines the utility of using ‘electronic computers’ in medical diagnosis

• The first time the notion of a ‘computer network’ is mentioned in the context of clinical computing• “a great significance of a national health computer

network cannot be overestimated”

• First time the notion of using clinical ‘data’ to optimize individual care is mentioned in our literature– “patient’s like mine” or evidence-based

practice

Page 18: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

3) “Digital Computer as Aid to Differential Diagnosis”(Lipkin, et al. 1961)

• First example of decision support in healthcare• Used structured data (information codes) • Used weights for relevant findings (ie,

‘pathognomonic = 10; positive sickle-cell prep is a 10 for sickle cell dz)

• DSS accomplished by ‘matching’ the input findings to those extracted (and coded) from a textbook (Wintrobe)

• A ranked the diagnosis list by ‘matched items’• Computer provided correct diagnosis in 57% of the

cases, but the correct diagnosis was at least in the differential list for all cases

‘information codes’ used to represent data

Page 19: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

4) “Medical Records that Guide and Teach” (Weed; 1968)

• Paper describing “problem oriented medical records”– As a core component of using the

chart to evaluate the quality of care being rendered

• Introduced the notion of a “flowsheet” with key data over time for a particular problem

• One of my favorite quotes in the discipline:

Page 20: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

5) “Design and Implementation of a Clinical Data Management System”(Greenes, Pappalardo, Marble, and Barnett; 1969)

• Paper outlines the nature of clinical data and the best way to ‘store’ it in a computer– “criteria for the design of a clinical data

management system include flexibility in its interface with its environment, the capability of handling variable length text string data, and of organizing it in tree-structured files”

– “with the exception of laboratory data, much of the clinical information in the medical record is generally recorded in narrative or free text form”

– “the expense and inefficiency of writing, debugging, and modifying such programs have been serious obstacles..”

• The first paper describes the “MGH Utility Multi-Programming System” (MUMPS)

Page 21: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

The importance of MUMPS

• An interpreted language (real-time interpreter)– Recognition that clinical data management

environments do not require ‘pure central processing’

– Interpreters make it easier to have cross platform software systems

• Combining logic/computation and data storage in the same language– Provides significant speed and robustness

• Arrays as data storage – fast, simple• Multi-user by design

– multiple users executing different parts of the program at the same time using the same interpreter...

– Uses a ‘re-entrant’ interpreter

• Estimated that >70% of all health records in the US today are stored in a MUMPS-based system (Epic, VISTA, Meditech)

Page 22: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

6) “Computer-based consultations in clinical therapeutics”(Shortliffe, 1975)

• The first example of an “expert system” based on artificial intelligence principles used in healthcare– Decision rules stored in a knowledge base– Rule system included a rule-acquisition

capability where new information could be incorporated by modifying rules in the decision rules database

• Demonstrated performance superior to infectious disease experts– MYCIN chose correctly 65% of the time– Faculty specialists: 42.5%-62.5%

• Introduced the notion of “explanations” for expert systems– critical for a system to explain its

decisions/recommendations to retain user (clinician) trust

Page 23: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

7) “An Application-Independent Subsystem for Free-Text Analysis”

(Fenichel and Barnett; 1975)

• The first paper to describe “free text analysis” (natural language processing) on clinical records

• Implemented in MUMPS• No evaluation, though

Page 24: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

8) “Quality Assurance through Automated Monitoring and Concurrent Feedback Using a Computer-Based Medical Information System”

(Barnett, et al; 1978)

• The first report of computerized clinical records being used for quality improvement

• An early example of “alerts and reminders” as an effective decision support tool

• The Harvard Community Health Plan implemented COSTAR in 1970– HCHP was a ‘pre-paid’ health plan (HMO)– COSTAR was the first clinical information

system to be broadly implemented

Page 25: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

9) “Origins of Medical Informatics”(Morris Collen; 1986)

• A historical perspective of the discipline by one of its “founding fathers”– 1950-1970’s– Describes the genesis of the discipline,

including how it became known as “informatics” in the US

– Origins of information science• Hollerith, Billings and the 1890 census• Punch-card electro-mechanical machine

used to process 62milliion records in 3 years

• Hollerith in 1896 created Tabulating Machine Company, renamed IBM Corp in 1924

Page 26: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

10) “Surveillance Using a Hospital Information System”(Classen, et al.;1991)

• A paper summarizing the use of the “Health Evaluation through Logical Processing” (HELP) for surveillance– HELP included an integrated clinical record (with data from

multiple ancillary systems)– Also has a decision support module for optimizing antibiotic

prophylaxis preoperatively

• One of the first reports of a computer based decision support system improving outcomes– Increased the appropriate use of peri-operative antibiotic

prophylaxis from 40% to 58%– Post-surgical wound infection rate decreased from 1.8% to 0.9%

• One of the first CPOE systems to be implemented routinely in a large institution– 1975 all medication ordering was computerized at LDS hospital– Implemented ‘drug alerts’ (90% resulted in changes)– Observed seizure rate for a particular antibiotic was 0.3%

compared to a national average of 2% at other medical centers

• Early use of ‘predictive analytics’– Using data from 150,000 admissions, a logistic regression model

was developed to predict hospital-acquired infection– Model correctly predicted in 65% of patients in a 1,000 patient

cohort

Page 27: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

11) “As We May Think: The Concept Space and Medical Hypertext”(Cimino, Elkin, Barnett; 1992)

• Described the notion of “hypertext” navigation of clinical data (pre-Web)– The WWW was first described by Tim

Berner’s Lee in a proposal he wrote for his boss at the CERN lab in 1988, Mosaic was first introduced in 1993.

• Highlighted common problems with hypertext navigation– We see these often in the web – cognitive

overhead required to review multiple web page retrieval results to find if one (or more) has what you want/need

• Introduced the notion of the ‘concept space’ (semantic space)– An early description of what might be

considered a ‘semantic web’

Page 28: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

12) “Physician Inpatient Order Writing on Microcomputer Workstations”

(Tierney, McDonald, et al.; 1993)

• One of the first examples of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an informatics intervention

• First large-scale study in medical informatics – 5,219 patients– 68 IM teams of students, residents, faculty

• First demonstration of the utilization/productivity improvement from physician order entry– The value of providing information “at the point of

ordering” to influence the utilization of resources

• Key Findings– Intervention reduced ‘charges’ by 12.7% -- ie, CPOE

can lead to more appropriate ordering– Length of stay reduced 0.89 days for intervention

teams– Intervention Interns spent 33min per 10-hours

*longer* to enter orders than the control group did to write them

Page 29: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

13) “Doctors, Patients, and Computers: Will Information Technology Dehumanize Health-Care Delivery?

(Shortliffe, 1993)

• Explores the “human dimension” in using computers in healthcare– The resistance of physicians to using

computers for clinical (although they use computers for many other things)

– The perceptions of patients when they encounter a ‘computer-using’ physician

– Whether computers will ‘dehumanize’ healthcare

– The changing nature of society when it comes to acceptance of technology

– Predicts that computers will ‘recede into the environment’ as ubiquitous computing emerges

Page 30: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

14) “A General Natural-Language Text Processor for Radiology”(Friedman et al; 1994))

• Describes the first ‘successful’ NLP system used in a clinical environment

• 230 radiology reports spanning 4 diseases (neoplasm, CHF, bacterial pneumonia, COPD)

• System has a recall and precision of 70% and 87% respectively

Page 31: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

15) “Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and Team Intervention on Prevention of Serious Medication Errors”

(Bates, Leape, et al.; 1998)

• The most cited article in the discipline

• Compared two interventions for preventing serious medication errors – one intervention was CPOE

• Showed CPOE reduces non-intercepted serious medication errors by 55%

• Demonstrated the patient-safety benefit from CPOE

Page 32: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

16) “Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry”

(Campbell, Sittig, Ash, et al; 2006)

• One of the first studies focused on unintended problems/errors caused by health information technology

• Focused on CPOE• Cases from 5 large academic

medical centers• Unintended consequences

– More/new work – 19.8%– Workflow issues – 17.6 %– System demands – 14.8%

• Overhead in maintaining the system, keeping up with regulatory compliance, etc..

Page 33: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

17) “Clinical Classification and Terminology: Some History and Current Observations”

(Chute; 2000)

• One of my favorite papers• A comprehensive ‘story’ of

terminological systems in healthcare

• A treatise on the rationale for the use of concept representation and terminologies in healthcare

• An excellent definition of “clinical terminology”:

Page 34: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

18) “Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care – A National Survey of Physicians”

(DesRoches, et al; 2008)

• A survey of physician use of EHRs that revealed only 14% used any kind of EHR

• Was an important moment for the country and its policy makers with regards to EHR adoption

• Showed that a large fraction of practicing physicians are in small groups (1-3 physicians) and adoption in that segment was extremely low

Page 35: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

19) “Decrease in Hospital-wide Mortality Rate After Implementation of a Commercially Sold Computerized Physician Order Entry System”

(Longhurst, et al; 2010)

• Demonstrated that CPOE reduced hospital-wide mortality– Estimated decrease in

adjusted mortality by 20%

– 36 fewer deaths over an 18-month period

Page 36: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

20) “Grid Binary LOgistic REgression (GLORE): Building shared models without sharing data

(Wu, Ohno-Machado, et al; 2012)

• A paper describing a method for performing decomposable regression models against distributed remote clinical data repositories

• Fulfills the original vision promoted by Ledley and Lusted 55 years ago– a ‘national computer network’ where

clinical data could be used to optimize the decisions being made by a physician in the context of a specific patient

Page 37: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Honorable Mention:“What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of

health information technology”(Kellerman and Jones; Health Affairs, 2012)

the largest benefit of health IT will be overall system productivity improvement....

Page 38: Classic Papers in Medical Informatics

Questions?