City Council Agenda Page 1 of 5 September 6, 2011

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING

AN AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, September 6, 2011

McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room

500 Rio Concho Drive

THE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.

ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTH

MAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE

IS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK,

ROOM 202, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.

City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 6:30 P.M. every

day for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting.

As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate”

Thank You!

I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.)

A. Call to Order

B. Prayer and Pledge

"Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.”

C. Proclamations

“Day of Community Prayer for the Success of the 2011 United Way Campaign in the Concho Valley”, to

be accepted by Patti Breitreiter, President & CEO for the United Way of the Concho Valley and Samantha

Batten-Crumrine, Administrative Assistant for the United Way of the Concho Valley

“Consider Compassion, 2011 Season of Peace”, to be accepted by Ambassadors of Peace representatives

“Constitution Week Sept. 18-24, 2011”, to be accepted by Shirley Huntley Dobson, Second Vice Regent,

Pocahontas Chapter, National Society Daughters of the American Revolution

“Adopt a Shelter Pet Month”, September 2011, to be accepted by Mary Golder, Board Member, Morgan

Trainer, Pet Foster Parent, and Caitlin Wylie, Pet Foster Parent

D. Recognitions

Kenneth C. Landon, Director of the International Waterlily Collection at San Angelo, Texas, and creator

of the beautiful waterlily, Nymphaea “Texas Dawn”; and, on April 26, 2011, the 82nd Legislature of the

State of Texas formally designated Nymphaea “Texas Dawn” as the official waterlily of the State of Texas

“Mariachi Alma Mexicana, 10th Anniversary”, to be accepted by Tommy Navarro and Mercy Perez,

Sponsors of Mariachi Alma Mexicana

E. Public Comment

The Council takes public comment on all items in the Regular Agenda. Public input on a Regular Agenda

item will be taken at its appropriate discussion. Public input on an item not on the Agenda or Consent

Agenda may be identified and requested for consideration by the Council at this time. The Council may

request an item to be placed on a future agenda, or for a Consent Agenda item, to be moved to the Regular

Agenda for public comment.

City Council Agenda Page 2 of 5 September 6, 2011

II. CONSENT AGENDA

1. Consideration of approving the August 30, 2011 City Council Regular meeting minutes

2. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Tax Deed for the sale of Tax Lot

Next to 324 E 12th Street, (Garcia), 36 ½’ x 117’ o/o, M. Himmer Survey #321, Miles Addition, $1,300,

Suit No. TAX91-0211B

3. Consideration of approving rental leases for Women, Infant’s and Children’s Supplemental Nutrition

Program (WIC) clinic spaces in Ballinger and Coleman, Texas

4. Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas,

acknowledging the critical water supply and water quality needs of the state of Texas and of the

communities of West Texas, the infrastructure required to meet those needs, the necessity for cost effective

programs to assist local government in financing water related projects, the effectiveness of financing

opportunities offered by the Texas Water Development Board, and supporting proposition 2, a proposed

Texas constitutional amendment providing for water financial assistance bonds

5. Consideration of adopting a Resolution accepting the Federal Aviation Administration’s FY-2011 Grant

No. 3-48-0191-032-2011 estimated at $1,089,278.00 for project costs for terminal building improvements,

and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a grant agreement therefore,

including provision obligating the City of San Angelo to pay up to 5% of project costs funded by the grant,

not to exceed $54,464.00; and, providing an effective date

6. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an

amendment to the City of San Angelo PARS Section 457 RICA Alternative Retirement Plan to comply

with recent legislation and regulations applicable to the plan, and to take such additional actions necessary

to maintain the City’s participation in PARS and to maintain PARS compliance with applicable regulations

issued or as may be issued

7. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and

execute a Public Transportation Master Grant Agreement; ratifying the execution of the Public

Transportation Master Grant Agreement; approving the terms and conditions of the Master Grant

Agreement; and, providing an effective date

8. Second Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit

“A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-10: San Angelo Planning Commission

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING

REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE

FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot at northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277,

specifically 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, abstract number 0037, changing the zoning

classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District;

PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

III. REGULAR AGENDA:

F. EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A.

Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings

be Open, Section 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property

Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A.

Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings

be Open, Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a company or companies

with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of

San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo

City Council Agenda Page 3 of 5 September 6, 2011

G. PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT

9. Presentation by the Aqua Squad Student Group

(Presentation by Students and Christy Youker, PhD, Education Director for the Upper Colorado River

Authority)

10. Second public hearing and adoption of an Ordinance of the City of San Angelo approving and

adopting the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012;

adopting employee compensation schedules; providing for the general appropriation of funds;

reserving unto the City Council the authority to transfer appropriations budgeted; ratifying transfers of

appropriations occurring in the 2010-2011 fiscal year and amending that budget ordinance

accordingly; reserving unto the City Council the power, only as permitted by law, to amend or make

changes in the budget for municipal purposes; providing authority for the City Manager or his

designee to make certain adjustments from time to time in or between budgeted allocations; and,

providing for filing of the budget

This budget will raise less total property taxes than last year’s budget by $163,572.00 (-0.60%), and of

that amount, $530,877.00 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the roll this year

(Presentation by Finance Director Michael Dane)

11. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance levying property taxes for the

City of San Angelo for the 2011 tax year:

AN ORDINANCE LEVYING TAXES AND PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND

COLLECTION THEREOF AND PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS, IN AND FOR THE CITY OF

SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, FOR THE 2011-2012 BUDGET YEAR

(Presentation by Finance Director Michael Dane)

12. Second Public Hearing and consideration of adoption of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit

“A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-09: City of San Angelo

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS

ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE

FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot located on the northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and

American Legion Road, specifically Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake

Nasworthy Subdivision, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1)

to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND

PROVIDING A PENALTY

(Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)

13. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit

“A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-11: ATMOS Energy

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS

ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE

FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1730 North Main Street, an approximately 2.6 acre tract of

property formed by segments of surveys, bordered by North Emerick Street on the west, East 18th

Street on the north, North Main Street on the east, and East 14th Street on the south, in north central

San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to Planned

City Council Agenda Page 4 of 5 September 6, 2011

Development (PD) District for a combination of office, aggregate and materials storage, accessory

parking, and contractor usage; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A

PENALTY

(Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)

14. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit

“A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-13: City of San Angelo

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS

ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE

FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 501 Rio Concho Drive, a roughly 9.1-acre tract at the

northwest corner of Rio Concho & Surber Drives, specifically occupying Lots 17 & 18 (except the

south 357’) and a segment of the north part (a portion of River Drive) of the Fort Concho River Lots

Addition, changing the zoning classification from Single Family Residential (RS-1) to Planned

Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

(Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)

15. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit

“A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-14: City of San Angelo Planning Commission

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS

ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE

FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: Area generally bounded by North Oakes Street on the west,

East/West 3rd Street on the north, Gillis Street on the west, and East/West College Avenue on the

south, in addition to one block generally bounded by Gillis Street on the west, West 2nd Street on the

north, North Irving Street on the west, and West 1st Street on the south, changing the zoning

classification from Multi-Familiy Residence and General Commercial/Heavy Commercial, (RM-1 and

CG/CH) to Central Business District (CB) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND

PROVIDING A PENALTY

(Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)

16. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit

“A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-16: First National Bank

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS

ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE

FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1814 Ward Street, about 122’ southeast from the intersection

of Ward Street and Pecos Street. An approximately 0.0845 acre tract (specifically Lot 14 and a 36’

section out of the abutting Lots of 15 and 13, Dawson-Eddiemann subdivision), in central San Angelo,

changing the zoning classification from Two-Family Residence (RS-2) to Office Commercial (CO)

District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

(Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)

17. Consideration of accepting the Phase II of the Historic Resources Survey

(Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)

City Council Agenda Page 5 of 5 September 6, 2011

18. Discussion, review, and possible action on the Water Conservation/Drought Contingency Plan options

(Presentation by Water Utilities Director Will Wilde)

19. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending the Water

Conservation/Drought Contingency Plan

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11, ARTICLE 11.200 OF THE CODE OF

ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ENTITLED “WATER CONSERVATION AND

DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN”, BY REPEALING ARTICLE 11.200 IN ITS ENTIRETY,

AND ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE 11.200; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND

PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

(Presentation by Water Utilities Director Will Wilde)

20. Presentation and update on the Employee Wellness Program and direction from City Council on how

to address non-participation in the health risk assessment (HRA) and health screening Wellness

Program

(Presentation by Human Resources Director Lisa Marley)

21. Presentation and update on the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program (ERRP)

(Presentation by Human Resources Director Lisa Marley)

22. Discussion and possible action on the consolidation of various City’ Boards and Commissions

a. Parks & Recreation

b. Development Services

(Presentation by City Manager Harold Dominguez and related City Board’s Liaisons)

H. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

23. Consideration of matters discussed in Executive/Session, if needed

24. Consideration of Future Agenda Items

25. Adjournment

Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter

551, Friday, September 2, 2011, at 5:00 P.M.

________________________

Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL MINUTE RECORD The City of San Angelo Page 1 Tuesday, August 30, 2011 Vol. 102

OPEN SESSION BE IT REMEMBERED City Council convened in a regular meeting at 9:03A.M., Tuesday, August 30, 2011, in the San Angelo McNease Convention Center, 500 Rio Concho Drive, San Angelo, Texas. All duly authorized members of the Council, to-wit:

Mayor, Alvin New Councilmember Paul Alexander Councilmember Dwain Morrison Councilmember Johnny Silvas Councilmember Fredd B. Adams, II Councilmember Kendall Hirschfeld Councilmember Charlotte Farmer

were present and acting, thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon, the following business was transacted:

An invocation was given by Father James Hademenos of the Greek Orthodox Assumption of the Virgin Mary Church and pledge was led by Nathan and Shaye Price, son and daughter of Michael Price, Recreation Supervisor at the Nature Center.

PROCLAMATION AND RECOGNITIONS

“Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) Volunteer Recognition Day”, Thursday, September 8, 2011, was accepted by Dolores Schwertner, RSVP Director, Concho Valley RSVP. Anita Savala, Social Service Assistant as the first recipient of the Women Infant & Children (WIC) Certification Specialist (WCS) certificate in Texas under the WCS Pilot Program. Keep San Angelo Beautiful/Great American Clean Up Event, to be accepted by City of San Angelo Department representatives: Operations: Jesus Hernandez, Alex Maldonado, Steven Olascuaga, Keith Zak, Ed Bara, Ray Martinez, Tony Gonzales, Manuel Martinez, Uvalde Ramirez, Antonio Mendoza, Raul Rojas, David Jones, Jimmy Rodriguez, Ismael Flores, Roberto Heredia, Manuel Pineda, Joe Gomez; Parks: Steven Grafa, Marcus Hinojosa, Victor Mendoza, Johnny Lopez, Rodney Halfmann, Jason Gamez; Stormwater: Doug Kirkham, Joe Mata, Jason Haines, Jake Alberts, Jason Franco, Abel Villarreal, Martin Moreno; Code Compliance: Blanca Briseno, Carlos Carrillo, Johnny O’Neal, Art Rangel, Adam Busenlehner; Sam’s Club: Charlotte Anderson, Stripes Convenience Store #5: Stephanie Reyes, Store Manager, and Cathy Mayberry, Regional Manager; Goodfellow Air Force Base: Michael Berkley, Staff Sergeant; 1st Community Federal Credit Union: Bonnie Borne; Lifepoint Baptist Church: Shane Dunlap

PUBLIC COMMENT

Public comment was made by West Texas Opportunity Strategy representative Craig Meyers and distributed a handout on housing rental regulations. Council directed staff to work with Mr. Meyers and present a recommendation.

Public comment was made by Gloria Griffin.

Councilmember Farmer commended Bob Bluthardt and the Ft. Concho staff for their tremendous efforts and successful “Welcome Home” Veteran’s event held this past weekend.

Page 2 Minutes Vol. 102 August 30, 2011 CONSENT AGENDA

APPROVAL OF THE AUGUST 2, 2011 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES

AWARD OF BIDS FOR WU-07-11 WATER UTILITIES INVENTORY SUPPLIES TO VARIOUS VENDORS (BENMARK SUPPLY, MUNICIPAL WATERWORKS, HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, MORRISON SUPPLY AND WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY) BASED ON LOWEST UNIT BID IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE BID REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH SPECIFIC ITEM

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AWARDING BID TO PRICE CONSTRUCTION, LTD. (BIG SPRING, TX), AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT IN THE SUM OF $3,029,464.00 AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR HICKORY AQUIFER WELL FIELD PIPELINES, RFB NO. WU-10-11 (ANNEX ?, PAGE , ORDINANCE #2011-08-0??)

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AN ELECTRIC SERVICE AGREEMENT AND ANY DOCUMENTS RELATED THERETO WITH SHARYLAND UTILITIES, L.P. FOR ELECTRICAL UTILITY SERVICES AND PROVIDING FOR CONTRIBUTIONS IN AID TO CONSTRUCTION FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO HICKORY WELL FIELD PROJECT (ANNEX ?, PAGE , ORDINANCE #2011-08-0??)

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT (AFA) WITH TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE PROVISION OF STATE SERVICES IN THE PRESERVATION AND ADAPTIVE USE OF LONE WOLF BRIDGE AS A HISTORIC BRIDGE OFF THE STATE SYSTEM, AND ANY FUTURE ACTION IN CONNECTION THERETO (ANNEX ?, PAGE , ORDINANCE #2011-08-0??)

ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF INVESTMENT POLICIES FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND LAKE NASWORTHY (ANNEX ?, PAGE , ORDINANCE #2011-08-0?? AND ANNEX ?, PAGE , ORDINANCE #2011-08-0??)

RATIFICATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ON AUGUST 10, 2011 TO CLOSE BANK ACCOUNTS, ONE TEXPOOL ACCOUNT, AND TO CONSOLIDATE REMAINING ACCOUNT BALANCES

Motion, to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously.

REGULAR AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT

AUTHORIZATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE for Z 11-09: City of San Angelo

General discussion was held

Motion, to authorize staff’s recommendation to allow the zone change, and overturn of PC vote, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Alexander. .

Public comments were made by Michael Featherwood, Burt Terrell, and Gary Cox.

A vote was take on the motno the floor; Nay Adams. Motion carried 6-1.

RECESS

Minutes Page 3 August 30, 2011 Vol. 102 At 10:33 A.M., Mayor New called a recess.

RECONVENE

At 10:51 A.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted:

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS (“CITY”) APPROVING A SETTLEMENT BETWEEN ATMOS ENERGY CORP’S MID-TEX DIVISION (“ATMOS”) AND ATMOS TEXAS MUNICIPALITIES (“ATM”) RESULTING IN NO CHANGE IN BASE RATES AND APPROVING TARIFFS WHICH REFLECT COSTS RELATED TO THE STEEL PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM; FINDING THE RATES SET BY THE ATTACHED TARIFFS TO BE JUST AND REASONABLE; REQUIRING DELIVERY OF THE RESOLUTION TO THE COMPANY AND LEGAL COUNSEL; DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION WAS APPROVED COMPLIED WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (ANNEX ?, PAGE , ORDINANCE #2011-08-0??)

Attorney Jim Boyle of Herrera & Boyle, PLLC presented background information.

Motion, to adopt the Resolution, as presented, was made by Councilmember Adams and seconded by Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously.

PRESENTATION OF THE SECOND QUARTER 2011 REPORT FROM THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL AND THE CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (CVB)

CVB Chairman Fred Key, CVB Vice President Pamela Miller, and Vice President for Economic Development John Dugan presented background information.

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND TOM GREEN COUNTY FOR SHARING EXPENSE OF THE MAINTENANCE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS OF THE TDCJ WORK CAMP 3 LOCATED AT 3282 N. US HIGHWAY 277, SAN ANGELO, TEXAS (ANNEX ?, PAGE , ORDINANCE #2011-08-0??)

Facilities/Maintenance Manager Ron Lewis presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record.

Motion, to adopt the Resolution, as presented, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and seconded by Councilmember Adams. Motion carried unanimously.

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO INITIATE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY (TO SAN ANGELO’S CITY LIMITS) WITHIN REVISED BOUNDARIES INCLUDING CERTAIN PROPERTIES LOCATED NORTHEAST OF SAN ANGELO, ENCOMPASSING AN AREA BOUNDED ROUGHLY BY NORTH U.S. HWY. 67 ON THE SOUTH, NORTH U.S. HWY. 277 ON THE EAST, FARM-TO-MARKET HWY. 2105 ON THE NORTH, AND A COMBINATION OF SCHWERTNER AND PRUITT ROADS ON THE WEST

Planning Manager AJ Fawver presented background information.

Motion, to authorize, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Adams. AYE: New, Alexander, Silvas, Adams, Hirschfeld, and Farmer. NAY: Morrison. Motion carried 6-1.

FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO

Page 4 Minutes Vol. 102 August 30, 2011 Z 11-10: San Angelo Planning Commission

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot at northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277, specifically 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, abstract number 0037, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Planning Manager AJ Fawver presented background information.

Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. Motion carried unanimously.

FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO

Z 11-09: City of San Angelo

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot located on the northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, specifically Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy Subdivision, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Planning Manager AJ Fawver presented background information.

Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Alexander. AYE: New, Alexander, Morrison, Silvas, Hirschfeld, and Farmer. NAY: Adams. Motion carried 6-1.

DISCUSSION OF AUGUST 13, 2011 FLOOD ISSUES

City Engineer Clinton Bailey presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the permanent supplement file.

Public comment was made by Citizen Gloria Griffin.

RECESS

At 12:16 P.M., Mayor New called a recess.

EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

At 12:30 P.M., Council convened in Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.071 to consult with attorney on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with this chapter on issues related to redistricting and the legislative changes associated with conducting general elections; and Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a company or companies with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development

Minutes Page 5 August 30, 2011 Vol. 102 negotiations and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo

RECESS

At 1:35 P.M., Mayor New called a recess.

OPEN SESSION (continued)

At 1:45 P.M. City Council concluded the Executive/Closed Session whereupon the following business was transacted:

POSTPONEMENT OF THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WATER CONSERVATION/DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11, ARTICLE 11.200 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ENTITLED “WATER CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN”, BY REPEALING ARTICLE 11.200 IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE 11.200; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

Water Utilities Director Will Wilde presented background information. A copy of the report is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record.

General discussion was held on the equity for those customers with a landscape and property meter and the potential abuse to use more water under the current allocations. Council suggested staff combine the total amount of usage between the two meters for an equitable solution.

Councilmember Alexander presented a usage chart comparing sprinkler systems, watering days, and manual watering methods.

Public comments were made by Citizens Jim Ryan, Jim Turner, and Davis Lewis.

In conclusion, Council directed staff to change or address the following:

· Section 10 Allowable Application Rates, should read: (10) Allowable Application Rates. The maximum amount of treated or raw city water applied to established lawns, landscape plants, golf courses (except greens) or shrubs should shall not exceed 1 inch per week.

· Apply higher amounts on surcharges

· Media Awareness Campaign via scorecard, website, and any other means or medium

Motion, to postpone the Ordinance, was made by and seconded by . Motion carried unanimously.

RECESS

At 3:00 P.M., Mayor New called a recess.

RECONVENE

At 3:10 P.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted: FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2012; ADOPTING EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SCHEDULES; PROVIDING FOR THE GENERAL APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER APPROPRIATIONS BUDGETED; RATIFYING TRANSFERS OF APPROPRIATIONS OCCURRING IN THE 2010-2011 FISCAL YEAR AND AMENDING THAT BUDGET ORDINANCE ACCORDINGLY; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE POWER, ONLY AS PERMITTED BY LAW, TO AMEND OR MAKE CHANGES IN THE

Page 6 Minutes Vol. 102 August 30, 2011 BUDGET FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES; PROVIDING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO MAKE CERTAIN ADJUSTMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME IN OR BETWEEN BUDGETED ALLOCATIONS; AND, PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE BUDGET

THIS BUDGET WILL RAISE LESS TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES THAN LAST YEAR’S BUDGET BY $163,572.00 (-0.60%), AND OF THAT AMOUNT, $530,877.00 IS TAX REVENUE TO BE RAISED FROM NEW PROPERTY ADDED TO THE ROLL THIS YEAR

Finance Director Michael Dane presented background information. A copy of the report is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record.

General discussion was held on the employee salary increases percentage allocations, stipend vs. salary increase, and the effects on the Compensation Plan.

Motion, to divide the $940,000 and authorize a lump sum payment for all employees, with the exception of Civil Service employees, temporary, and probationary employees hired after April 1, was made by Councilmember Morrison and seconded by Councilmember Adams.

Public comments were made by Citizens Jim turner and Sue Mimms, and Police Chief Tim Vasquez.

A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. AYE: Morrison, Silvas, and Adams. NAY: New, Alexander, Hirschfeld, and Farmer. Motion failed 3-4.

Motion, to authorize a 3.5% salary increase for employees receiving less than $50K and receiving a meets expectations on their annual evaluation and 1.5% lump sum payment receiving an exceeds expectation; and 2% salary increase for employees for receiving more than $50K and receiving a meets expectations on their annual evaluation and 2% lump sum payment for receiving an exceeds expectation, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and seconded by Councilmember Alexander. Motion carried unanimously.

Council also directed staff to update the Compensation Plan, the benchmark data, and present at a future meeting.

Motion, to adopt the budget ????statement, was made by Councilmember Morrison and seconded by Councilmember Alexander. Mayor New opened the floor to hear public comments. No comments were made. A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Dane informed staff has presented issues related to the Texas Bank Sports Complex maintenance budget and will present a solution and work out the details via budget amendments. POSTPONEMENT OF CONSULTATION WITH REDISTRICTING LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING:

· Redistricting standards and development of new city council districts redistricting plan(s)

· Presentation by redistricting counsel of draft redistricting plans, and discussion

· Redistricting plan map-drawing session with redistricting legal counsel, if necessary

Mayor New remarked a presentation will be made at a future meeting.

POSTPONEMENT OF DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO DESIGNATE ONE OR MORE DRAFT REDISTRICTING PLANS AS ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN(S) TO BE PROPOSED FOR PUBLIC CONSIDERATION AND COMMENT; AND, TO SCHEDULE ONE OR MORE PUBLIC HEARINGS AT WHICH TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON DESIGNATED REDISTRICTING ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN(S) FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC

Mayor New remarked a presentation will be made at a future meeting.

Minutes Page 7 August 30, 2011 Vol. 102 PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION REGARDING THE LEGISLATIVE CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUTURE PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING THE GENERAL ELECTION TO ELECT MUNICIPAL OFFICERS IN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND ANY ACTION IN CONNECTION THERETO

City Clerk Alicia Ramirez presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the permanent supplement record.

Public comments were made by Elections Administrator Vona McKerley, Citizens Jim Turner, and Jim Ryan.

General discussion was held on the options presented and Council agreed to maintain the May election uniform date and work with the Elections Administrator on reducing the number of polling place from 27 to 8. Once finalized, staff will submit the proposal to the Department of Justice to obtain the pre-clearance as required by state law before implementing such changes.

FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

No action was taken on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session.

CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

City Manager Harold Dominguez distributed the proposed September 6, 2011 Agenda and solicited Council comments and suggestions.

ADJOURNMENT

Motion, to adjourn, was made by Councilmember Morrison and seconded by Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously.

The meeting adjourned at 5:15 P.M.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ___________________________________ Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST: _______________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Annexes A->>> In accordance with Chapter 2, Article 2.300, of the Official Code of the City of San Angelo, the minutes of this meeting consist of the preceding Minute Record and the Supplemental Minute Record. Details on Council meetings may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office or a video of the entire meeting may be purchased from the Public Information Officer at 481-2727. (Portions of the Supplemental Minute Record video tape recording may be distorted due to equipment malfunction or other uncontrollable factors.)

Page 8 Minutes Vol. 102 August 30, 2011

P R O C L A M A T I O N

WHEREAS, San Angelo and the surrounding area faces a pet overpopulation

epidemic resulting in local shelters continually running at or above full capacity; and

WHEREAS, PetSmart is hosting a three-day pet adoption event that will be

held at all PetSmart stores in North America; and WHEREAS, During the most recent National Adoption Weekend held in April,

15,581 pets found new homes; and WHEREAS, Sadie’s Rescue and Critter Shack Humane Society of Menard

County are partnering together with our local PetSmart in San Angelo on the weekend of September 9th through 11th with a goal of helping to find pets a lifelong, loving home.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim the month of September, 2011 as “ADOPT A SHELTER PET MONTH” and encourage the community to adopt a shelter pet at PetSmart in San Angelo from September 9th – 11th!

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 6th day of September, 2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ___________________________

Alvin New, Mayor

P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, The United Way of the Concho Valley’s mission is to

increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another; and

WHEREAS, The United Way of the Concho Valley has shown great

initiative and enhanced the quality of life in the Concho Valley; and

WHEREAS, The United Way of the Concho Valley works tirelessly to

increase awareness of the needs of people in this community and strives to assist them through the services of its nineteen member agencies that provide twenty programs.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby declare Sunday, September 18, 2011, as

“DAY OF COMMUNITY PRAYER FOR THE SUCCESS OF THIS YEAR’S

UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN IN THE CONCHO VALLEY”

and urge all citizens to participate in this extraordinary, humanitarian effort.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 6th day of September, 2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

____________________________________________ ALVIN NEW, MAYOR

P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, Our Founders, in order to secure the blessings of liberty for themselves

and their posterity, did ordain and establish a Constitution for the United States of America; and

WHEREAS, It is of the greatest importance that all citizens fully understand the

provisions and principles contained in the Constitution in order to support, preserve, and defend it against all enemies; and

WHEREAS, The 224th anniversary of the Signing of the Constitution provides an

historic opportunity for all Americans to remember the achievements of our Framers of the Constitution and the rights, privileges, and responsibilities they afforded us in this unique document; and

WHEREAS, The independence guaranteed to American citizens, whether by birth or

naturalization, should be celebrated by appropriate ceremonies and activities during Constitution Week, September 18-24, as designated by proclamation of the President of the United States of America in accordance with Public Law 915.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Joseph W. Lown, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim the week of September 18-24, 2011, as “CONSTITUTION WEEK” in the City of San Angelo, Texas, and urge all our citizens to reflect during that week on the many benefits of our Federal Constitution and the privileges and responsibilities of American citizenship. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have

hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 6th day of September, 2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ALVIN NEW, MAYOR

SPECIAL RECOGNITION WHEREAS, Mariachi Alma Mexicana was founded in 2001 by Peggy Garcia

and Veronica Garcia; and WHEREAS, On August 12, 2011, Mariachi Alma Mexicana celebrated their

10-year Anniversary with a free concert at Kirby Park; and WHEREAS, Mariachi Alma Mexicana has performed for various functions

and events in San Angelo, throughout the State of Texas, and in New Mexico; and

WHEREAS, The members of Mariachi Alma Mexicana are focused and

dedicated to providing positive entertainment to a growing audience while keeping the art form of Mariachi music alive.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, do hereby recognize and applaud

“MARIACHI ALMA MEXICANA” for their commitment to enhance the art and cultural heritage of San Angelo over the last ten years.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 6th day of September, 2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO __________________________

ALVIN NEW, MAYOR

P R O C L A M A T I O N

WHEREAS, The Peace Ambassadors of West Texas are working in relationship

with several groups to facilitate local, national, and global peace by offering interfaith dialogues, prayer services, and educational programs while gathering to build relationships in the “Consider Compassion; 2011 Season of Peace”; and

WHEREAS, Beginning with an Interfaith Opening Prayer Vigil at Unity

Church on September 7th and ending with placing Pinwheels for Peace on the Courthouse lawn for all to see on September 21st, the Peace Ambassadors will also facilitate “Conversations in Compassion” on September 15th featuring 5 speakers from major world religions discussing compassion as their traditions view it followed by dialogue and dessert and sponsored by ASU at their C.J. Davidson Center; and

WHEREAS, At all these and other planned events, the public is welcomed and

also invited to bring a case of canned goods to support “A Case for Compassion” to benefit the Concho Valley Regional Food Bank as an outreach in compassion this Season; and

WHEREAS, All people and their faith communities are encouraged to reflect

on how compassion works in their lives and how they can use it more expansively so together all may manifest peace in our city, county, and world as people come together and sow compassion.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim September 8th through September 21st as the “CONSIDER COMPASSION” 2011 SEASON OF PEACE and encourage all to engage in compassionate thought, action, and prayer so we may begin to live in lasting global peace.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 6th day of September, 2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ___________________________

ALVIN NEW, MAYOR

Memo Date: August 11, 2011

To: Mayor and Council Members

From: Roger Banks, Purchasing Director

Subject: Agenda Item for September 6, 2011 Council Meeting

Contact: Diana Farris, Property Manager, Purchasing Department, 657-4212

Caption: Consent Item

Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a Resolution authorizing sale of Tax Lot(s): A. Next to 324 E 12th Street, (Garcia), 36 ½’ x 117’ o/o, M. Himmer Survey #321, Miles Addition, $1,300, Suit No.

TAX91-0211B

Summary: The subject properties were auctioned with no offers received. Subsequently, the properties were struck off to the City as Trustee for itself and the other taxing entities.

The lot size, amount of offers, and what the offer will satisfy are as follows: SIZE OFFER OFFER WILL SATISFY… A. 36 ½’ x 117’ $ 1,300.00 Offer satisfies all court costs and a portion of the taxes History: Listed below are the breakdowns of amounts owed: A. Taxes: $ 1,559.24 B. Taxes: $ 0.00 C. Taxes: $ 0.00 Sheriff Fees $ 133.63 Sheriff Fees $ 0.00 Sheriff Fees $ 0.00 District Clerk $ 419.69 District Clerk $ 0.00 District Clerk $ 0.00 Attorney Fees $ 87.44 Attorney Fees $ 0.00 Attorney Fees $ 0.00 Administration $ 350.00 Administration $ 0.00 Administration $ 0.00 Municipal Liens $ 0.00 Municipal Liens $ 0.00 Municipal Liens $ 0.00 $ 2,550.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Financial Impact: All Properties will be reinstated back onto tax roll. Other Information/Recommendation: It has been verified by all entities that no outstanding balance exist for the Prospective Buyers. It is recommended that the above offers be accepted. Attachments: Resolution, Tax-Resale Deed, and Property Location Map Presentation: N/A Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, Administration Service Director

City of San Angelo

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number.

Tax-Resale Deed (Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value)

Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as

Trustee for itself, Tom Green County, San Angelo Independent School District. P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76902 Grantee: David M. Garcia, a married person 336 E. 12th Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements):

36 ½ Feet by 117 feet out of the M. Himmer Survey #321, City of San Angelo, as described in Volume 329, Page 184, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.

Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on August 23,

1993, in Cause No. 91-0211B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas.

Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and

as Trustee for all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated February 17, 1997, and recorded in Volume 570, Pages 90, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.

For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly

authorized to execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax-Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in §5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded.

Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded

before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.

Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the

market value specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment. Each taxing unit that is entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property has consented to this sale and has authorized this sale by formal resolution. The parties acknowledge that the sale of the Property to Grantee does not constitute a violation of Section 52, Article III, Texas Constitution.

Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and all future years.

When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.

GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment By: ____________________________

ATTEST: Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agent

Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2010, by Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, on behalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in the above instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas After Recording, Return To:

100 ft

City of San Angelo GIS Division

Copyright 1988-2011

For Illustrative Purposes Only.

y:\council\electronic agendas\2011\09-06-11\pur tax lot resolution.doc

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY

(Less than Adjudged Value or Judgment)

WHEREAS, on the day of , 2011 at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, there was presented to said Council the proposal for the City to sell a parcel of land situated within the city limits of the City of San Angelo, said parcel being described as follows:

36 ½ FEET BY 117 FEET OUR OF THE MILES ADDITION, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, BEING OUT OF THE M. HIMMER SURVEY #321, AS DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 329, PAGE 184, DEED RECORDS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, TEXAS.

WHEREAS, said lot(s) are held by the City of San Angelo, as Trustee by virtue of Sheriff’s Tax Deed, recorded in Volume 570, Page 90-91, of the Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of San Angelo as Trustee to sell said lot(s) for an amount that is less than the lesser of the market value specified in the Judgment of foreclosure or the amount of the judgment(s) against said property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized in his capacity as representative of the City of San Angelo, Trustee to execute a Quitclaim Deed to the above described lot(s) to DAVID M. GARCIA, a married person, for the consideration of One Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,300.00) and that the sale for said amount is also hereby authorized and approved. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

______________________________ Alvin New, Mayor

Attest: _____________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Approved As to Content: ______________________ ____________________________ Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Manager

City Council Agenda Page 1 of 4 August 30, 2011

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING INCLUDING ADDENDUM

AN AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, August 30, 2011 McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room

500 Rio Concho Drive THE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTH MAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE IS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, ROOM 202, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 6:30 P.M. every day for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting.

As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate” Thank You!

I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.)

A. Call to Order

B. Prayer and Pledge

"Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.”

C. Proclamation

“Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) Volunteer Recognition Day”, Thursday, September 8, 2011, to be accepted by Dolores Schwertner, RSVP Director, Concho Valley RSVP

D. Recognitions

Anita Savala, Social Service Assistant, the first recipient of the Women Infant & Children (WIC) Certification Specialist (WCS) certificate in Texas under the WCS Pilot Program

Keep San Angelo Beautiful/Great American Clean Up Event, to be accepted by City of San Angelo Department representatives: Operations: Jesus Hernandez, Alex Maldonado, Steven Olascuaga, Keith Zak, Ed Bara, Ray Martinez, Tony Gonzales, Manuel Martinez, Uvalde Ramirez, Antonio Mendoza, Raul Rojas, David Jones, Jimmy Rodriguez, Ismael Flores, Roberto Heredia, Manuel Pineda, Joe Gomez; Parks: Steven Grafa, Marcus Hinojosa, Victor Mendoza, Johnny Lopez, Rodney Halfmann, Jason Gamez; Stormwater: Doug Kirkham, Joe Mata, Jason Haines, Jake Alberts, Jason Franco, Abel Villarreal, Martin Moreno; Code Compliance: Blanca Briseno, Carlos Carrillo, Johnny O’Neal, Art Rangel, Adam Busenlehner; Sam’s Club: Charlotte Anderson, Stripes Convenience Store #5: Stephanie Reyes, Store Manager, and Cathy Mayberry, Regional Manager; Goodfellow Air Force Base: Michael Berkley, Staff Sergeant; 1st Community Federal Credit Union: Betty Borne; Lifepoint Baptist Church: Shane Dunlap

E. Public Comment

The Council takes public comment on all items in the Regular Agenda. Public input on a Regular Agenda item will be taken at its appropriate discussion. Public input on an item not on the Agenda or Consent Agenda may be identified and requested for consideration by the Council at this time. The Council may request an item to be placed on a future agenda, or for a Consent Agenda item, to be moved to the Regular Agenda for public comment.

City Council Agenda Page 2 of 4 August 30, 2011

II. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Consideration of approving the August 2, 2011 City Council Regular meeting minutes 2. Consideration of awarding bids for WU-07-11 Water Utilities Inventory Supplies to various vendors

(Benmark Supply, Municipal Waterworks, HD Supply Waterworks, Morrison Supply and Western Industrial Supply) based on lowest unit bid in compliance with the bid requirements for each specific item

3. Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo awarding bid to Price Construction, Ltd. (Big Spring, TX), and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a Performance Agreement in the sum of $3,029,464.00 and related documents for Hickory Aquifer Well Field Pipelines, RFB No. WU-10-11

4. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute the agreement and related documents with Sharyland Utilities (sole source provider) for the construction, installation, and furnishing of said facility to provide electric service to the City of San Angelo Hickory Well Field project not to exceed the amount of $3,000,000.00 of the City of San Angelo authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute an electric service agreement and any documents related thereto with Sharyland Utilities, L.P. for electrical utility services and providing for contributions in aid to construction for electric service to the City of San Angelo Hickory Well Field Project

5. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a third amendment to the Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with Texas Department of Transportation for the provision of state services in the preservation and adaptive use of Lone Wolf Bridge as a historic bridge off the state system, and any future action in connection thereto

6. Consideration of adopting Resolutions authorizing the adoption of Investment Policies for the City of San Angelo and Lake Nasworthy

7. Consideration of ratifying a Resolution adopted by the City of San Angelo Development Corporation on August 10, 2011 to close bank accounts, one Texpool account, and to consolidate remaining account balances

III. REGULAR AGENDA:

F. EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.071 to consult with attorney on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with this chapter on issues related to redistricting and the legislative changes associated with conducting general elections

Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a company or companies with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo

G. PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT

8. Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas (“City”) approving a settlement between Atmos Energy Corp’s Mid-Tex Division (“Atmos”) and Atmos Texas Municipalities (“ATM”) resulting in no change in base rates and approving tariffs which reflect costs related to the steel pipe replacement program; finding the rates set by the attached tariffs to be just and reasonable; requiring delivery of the Resolution to the company and legal counsel; determining that

Addendum

City Council Agenda Page 3 of 4 August 30, 2011

the meeting at which this Resolution was approved complied with the Open Meetings Act; making other findings and provisions related to the subject; and declaring an effective date (Presentation by Attorney Jim Boyle of Herrera & Boyle, PLLC)

9. Presentation of the Second Quarter 2011 Report from the Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Council and the Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB) (Presentation by CVB Chairman Fred Key, CVB Vice President Pamela Miller, and Vice President for Economic Development John Dugan)

10. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing staff to negotiate and authorizing City Manager to execute an Interlocal Agreement between the City of San Angelo and Tom Green County for sharing expense of the maintenance and capital improvements of the TDCJ Work Camp 3 located at 3282 N. US Highway 277, San Angelo, Texas (Presentation by Facilities/Maintenance Manager Ron Lewis)

11. Discussion and possible action to initiate annexation of property (to San Angelo’s City limits) within revised boundaries including certain properties located northeast of San Angelo, encompassing an area bounded roughly by North U.S. Hwy. 67 on the south, North U.S. Hwy. 277 on the east, Farm-to-Market Hwy. 2105 on the north, and a combination of Schwertner and Pruitt Roads on the west (Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)

12. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 11-10: San Angelo Planning Commission AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot at northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277, specifically 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, abstract number 0037, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY (Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)

13. Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of proposed zone change, and, possible first public hearing and consideration of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 11-09: City of San Angelo AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot located on the northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, specifically Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy Subdivision, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY (Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)

14. Discussion of August 13, 2011 flood issues (Presentation by City Engineer Clinton Bailey)

City Council Agenda Page 4 of 4 August 30, 2011

15. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending the Water Conservation/Drought Contingency Plan AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11, ARTICLE 11.200 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ENTITLED “WATER CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN”, BY REPEALING ARTICLE 11.200 IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE 11.200; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (Presentation by Water Utilities Director Will Wilde)

16. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance of the City of San Angelo approving and adopting the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012; adopting employee compensation schedules; providing for the general appropriation of funds; reserving unto the City Council the authority to transfer appropriations budgeted; ratifying transfers of appropriations occurring in the 2010-2011 fiscal year and amending that budget ordinance accordingly; reserving unto the City Council the power, only as permitted by law, to amend or make changes in the budget for municipal purposes; providing authority for the City Manager or his designee to make certain adjustments from time to time in or between budgeted allocations; and, providing for filing of the budget This budget will raise less total property taxes than last year’s budget by $163,572.00 (-0.60%), and of that amount, $530,877.00 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the roll this year (Presentation by Finance Director Michael Dane)

17. Consultation with redistricting legal counsel regarding: a. Redistricting standards and development of new city council districts redistricting plan(s) b. Presentation by redistricting counsel of draft redistricting plans, and discussion c. Redistricting plan map-drawing session with redistricting legal counsel, if necessary (Presentation by Attorney David Mendez of Bickerstaff, Heath, Delgado, Acosta, L.L.P.)

18. Discussion and possible action to designate one or more draft redistricting plans as Illustrative Plan(s) to be proposed for public consideration and comment; and, to schedule one or more public hearings at which to receive comments on designated redistricting Illustrative Plan(s) from members of the public (Presentation by Attorney David Mendez of Bickerstaff, Heath, Delgado, Acosta, L.L.P.)

19. Preliminary discussion regarding the legislative changes associated with the future procedure for conducting the general election to elect municipal officers in the City of San Angelo and any action in connection thereto (Presentation by City Clerk Alicia Ramirez)

H. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

20. Consideration of matters discussed in Executive/Session, if needed 21. Consideration of Future Agenda Items 22. Adjournment

Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, Thursday, August 25, 2011, at 5:00 P.M.

/s/________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

City of San Angelo WIC

Memo Date: September 2, 2011

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Gloria Hale, WIC Manager

Subject: Agenda Item for 9/06/2011Council Meeting

Contact: Gloria Hale 657-4396 ext.# 1321

Caption: Consent

Consideration of approving renewal of leases for Women, Infant’s and Children’s Supplemental Nutrition Program (WIC) clinic space in Ballinger and Coleman.

Summary: City of San Angelo WIC is contracted as program provider in six surrounding counties. The current lease for Runnels clinic space expires October 1st, 2011. The current lease for Coleman expires January 1st, 2012. Revised leases are of ten years duration.

History: City of San Angelo contracts with Texas Department of State Health Services to provide nutrition education and supplemental food benefits through the WIC Nutrition Program. WIC of San Angelo serves Tom Green and rural families in six surrounding counties. Two counties have WIC Clinics located for service to rural clients.

Financial Impact: Funds for leases are already budgeted so there is no fiscal impact. WIC is a federally funded program and uses no local tax revenues.

Related Vision Item: Neighborhood Vision: Fostering a sense of community.

Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of WIC Clinic lease renewals.

Attachments: Leases for Ballinger and Coleman WIC Clinics.

Presentation: None

Publication: None

Reviewed by Director:

Neighborhood and Family Services Director: Robert Salas

Approved by Legal: Leases reviewed and approved by City Legal Department

1

PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT FOR WATER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BONDS

Texas Water Development Board Proposition 2

The constitutional amendment allowing for the issuance of additional general obligation bonds by the Texas Water Development Board in an amount not to exceed $6 billion outstanding at any time. As the population of Texas continues to grow, so does its need for cost-effective water and wastewater infrastructure. Through its funding programs, the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) provides financial assistance to communities for water and wastewater infrastructure projects. On November 8, 2011, Texans can vote on a constitutional amendment, Proposition 2, that will help ensure the public health, water quality, and economic viability of Texas for years to come. WHAT IS PROPOSITION 2? Proposition 2 authorizes the TWDB to issue additional general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $6 billion outstanding at any time for water-related projects. The TWDB will use the bond proceeds to make loans to political subdivisions in Texas for a variety of water, wastewater, and flood control projects. Since 1957, the legislature and voters have approved constitutional amendments authorizing the TWDB to issue up to $4.23 billion in bonds for financing water-related projects, of which $3.29 billion has been issued. Of the amount issued, over $1 billion has been issued just in the last three years. Without additional bonding authority, the TWDB will not be able to provide adequate financing to meet the water and wastewater infrastructure needs of Texas. The TWDB estimates that its existing bond authority will be exhausted within the next one to two years. This proposition will provide the TWDB with the necessary constitutional authority to meet the water and wastewater infrastructure needs of Texas. WHAT IS THE TWDB? The TWDB was created in 1957 in response to the severe drought of the 1950s. The TWDB is the state agency authorized to issue and sell general obligation bonds to support financial assistance programs for the planning, design, and construction of water supply, wastewater treatment, stormwater and nonpoint source pollution control, flood control, and agricultural water conservation projects.

2

WILL PROPOSITION 2 COST TAXPAYERS? The only cost to the state will be the cost of the election. Repayment of the bonds will not require State of Texas general revenue. The TWDB will use this bond authority to operate a self-supporting loan program, which means that repayments on loans will pay for the bonds. Entities that choose to use this funding opportunity to address their future water and wastewater needs will repay the principal and interest on the loans they receive from the TWDB. Those principal and interest payments will be used to repay the bonds. Because the cost of water-related infrastructure can be significant, an entity can use the TWDB funding to pay for construction and then pay the principal and interest on the loan with revenue received through use of the facility over time. Those persons benefiting from the projects will repay the loans, and thus the bonds. HOW WILL THESE BONDS BE USED? The TWDB issues general obligation bonds and uses the proceeds to make water-related loans to political subdivisions in Texas. The majority of TWDB loans are made for water and wastewater projects, and funds may also be used for flood control projects. The loans provide financial assistance needed to make facility repairs, improvements, and expansions, which may include water towers, transmission lines and water wells. The loans also provide funds for building new water supply and water and wastewater treatment facilities, as well as flood control projects. In addition, the TWDB uses bond proceeds to meet the state's match requirements for federal grants each year for the TWDB’s two State Revolving Fund Loan Programs—the Drinking Water and Clean Water State Revolving Funds. The state revolving funds provide loans at interest rates lower than those offered by traditional markets for financing water and wastewater projects. In 2010, these grants totaled $179,380,000. If the TWDB is unable to provide the required matches, it will be ineligible for the federal grants, and future federal grants will be disbursed to other states. WHO CAN RECEIVE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE TWDB’S PROGRAMS? The TWDB primarily provides loans to political subdivisions, such as cities, counties, districts, river authorities, and also to nonprofit water supply corporations. Due to the state’s strong credit rating, the TWDB can often issue debt at more cost-effective rates and then lend to community borrowers who benefit from the lower interest rates available on the state’s bonds. Borrowers who may be unable to access funds from traditional markets particularly benefit from the TWDB’s financial assistance programs. RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF BOND PROCEEDS The use of the bond proceeds authorized by this constitutional amendment is limited to financial assistance to political subdivisions for water, wastewater, and flood control projects.

3

The additional bond authority cannot be used for other purposes such as TWDB administrative expenses or grants.

1

Proposed Constitutional Amendment For Water Financial Assistance Bonds

Texas Water Development Board Proposition 2

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the Texas Water Development Board? A: The TWDB is a constitutionally created agency authorized to issue and sell general

obligation bonds to support financial assistance programs for the planning, design, and construction of water supply, wastewater treatment, stormwater and nonpoint source pollution control, flood control, and agricultural water conservation projects.

Q: Will Proposition 2 cost taxpayers? A: The only cost to the state will be the cost of the election. Repayment of the bonds will not

require State of Texas general revenue. The TWDB will use this bond authority to operate a self-supporting loan program, which means that repayments on loans will pay for the bonds. Entities that choose to use this funding opportunity to address their future water and wastewater needs will repay the principal and interest on the loans they receive from the TWDB. Those principal and interest payments will be used to repay the bonds. Because the cost of water-related infrastructure can be significant, an entity can use the TWDB funding to pay for construction and then pay the principal and interest on the loan with revenue received through use of the facility over time. Those persons benefiting from the projects will repay the loans, and thus the bonds.

Q. How does the bond process work?

Simply put, a bond is a loan. It is a contract to repay borrowed money with interest. Local entities request a loan from the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), who, on behalf of the state, then issues bonds and loans the proceeds to the local entity for water-related projects. The local entities repay their loans with interest, and the TWDB then uses those funds to pay the scheduled payments on the TWDB-issued bonds. As a result, these bonds do not draw from state general revenue.

Q. What will Proposition 2 be used for? A: Proposition 2 gives the TWDB the ability to partner with local entities by providing loans to

fund water, wastewater, and flood control projects in Texas. Local entities use the loans they receive from TWDB to repair, improve, or expand existing facilities, such as water towers, transmission lines, water wells and sewer collection lines. The loans may also be used to build new infrastructure.

2

Q. Why do we need Proposition 2? A: The water and wastewater infrastructure in Texas is aging and needs repair. Additionally,

more infrastructure is needed to deliver and/or ensure continuous delivery of water to all Texans. The population in Texas is projected to double over the next 50 years while its water supplies decrease. If additional water supplies and infrastructure are not created, Texas businesses and workers could lose an estimated $115.7 billion in income, and the creation of 1.1 million new jobs is potentially jeopardized.

The 2011 Regional Water Plans identified $27 billion needed from state financial assistance programs in order to meet water supply needs over the next 50 years. This amount, however, does not include funds for repair and rehabilitation of water infrastructure necessary for meeting state and federal standards, nor additional wastewater treatment and disposal capacity and additional flood control capacity.

Q: What is the state’s role? A: The TWDB is the state agency that provides low-interest loans to local government entities

for water, wastewater and flood control projects. The TWDB can issue loans at more cost-effective rates than are available in traditional markets due to the state’s high credit rating.

Q: Who benefits from Proposition 2? A: Texas. Cities, counties, water districts, river authorities, and nonprofit water supply

corporations are all eligible to use TWDB’s financial assistance programs in order to address water and wastewater infrastructure needs.

Q: What will happen if Proposition 2 fails? A: Because of the economy, many local entities need to partner with the state to access funds

for water-related infrastructure. Without the funds provided through Proposition 2, most local entities will not be able to get financing for water-related infrastructure.

Q: Is this the first time the state has asked for water bonds?

A: No. Since 1957, the legislature and voters have approved constitutional amendments authorizing the TWDB to issue up to $4.23 billion in bonds for financing water-related projects, of which $3.29 billion has been issued. Of the amount issued, over $1 billion has been issued just in the last three years. Once the remaining funds are depleted, the TWDB will not be able to assist local entities with water infrastructure needs.

3

Q: Is this a blank check? A: No. Bonds are issued based on requests for funds from local entities. In addition, the

Bond Review Board, chaired by the Governor and composed of state leadership, oversees issuance of all state bonds, including the TWDB’s bonds. At any time, the state can deny TWDB’s request to issue bonds.

Q: Will the bonds be used to build reservoirs? A: Since reservoirs are very expensive to build, they typically need a specific appropriation

from the legislature. These bonds may be used for reservoir construction, but a legislative appropriation would likely be necessary.

Q: Who should we contact for more information? A: Contact Melanie Callahan, Interim Executive Administrator of the Texas Water

Development Board, at 512-463-7850 or Melanie.Callahan@twdb.state.tx.us.

Click here for instructions. City of San Angelo

Memo Date: September 2, 2011

Mayor and Councilmembers To:

From: City Manager Harold Dominguez

Agenda Item for September 1, 2011 Council Meeting Subject:

City Manager Harold Dominguez Contact:

Consent Item Caption:

Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, acknowledging the critical water supply and water quality needs of the state of Texas and of the communities of West Texas, the infrastructure required to meet those needs, the necessity for cost effective programs to assist local government in financing water related projects, the effectiveness of financing opportunities offered by the Texas Water Development Board, and supporting proposition 2, a proposed Texas constitutional amendment providing for water financial assistance bonds

Proposition 2 would amend the constitution to authorize the Texas Water Development Board to issue additional general obligation bonds on a continuing basis for one or more accounts of the Texas Water Development Fund II, with the restriction that the total amount of bonds outstanding at any time does not exceed $6 billion.

Summary:

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of additional general obligation bonds by the Texas Water Development Board in an amount not to exceed $6 billion at any time outstanding.”

The City of San Angelo Development Corporation also voted unanimously to support the measure at their meeting on August 24, 2011.

Texas Water Development Board has been instrumental to the City’s water development plan, specifically in securing funding for the Hickory Pipeline project. The Board issues and sell general obligation bonds to support financial assistance programs for the planning, design, and construction of water supply, wastewater treatment, stormwater and nonpoint source pollution control, flood control, and agricultural water conservation projects.

History:

Financial Impact Proposition 2 is designed to be self supporting, meaning that repayment of the bonds will not require State of Texas general revenue. The TWDB will use this bond authority to operate a self-supporting loan program, which means that repayments on loans will pay for the bonds. Entities that choose to use this funding opportunity to address their future water and wastewater needs will repay the principal and interest on the loans they receive from the TWDB. Those principal and interest payments will be used to repay the bonds. Because the cost of water-related infrastructure can be significant, an entity can use the TWDB funding to pay for construction and then pay the principal and interest on the loan with revenue received through use of the facility over time. Those persons benefiting from the projects will repay the loans, and thus the bonds

:

Securing long term water supply. Related Vision Item

(if applicable):

Other Information/ Recommendation

Staff recommends approval of the Resolution :

Attachments Proposition 2 : Fact Sheet, FAQs, and Resolution

Presentation City Manager Harold Dominguez :

Publication None :

Reviewed by Director

City Manager Harold Dominguez :

September 1, 2011 Approved by Legal:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ACKNOWLEDGING THE CRITICAL WATER SUPPLY AND WATER QUALITY NEEDS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND OF THE COMMUNITIES OF WEST TEXAS, THE INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIRED TO MEET THOSE NEEDS, THE NECESSITY FOR COST EFFECTIVE PROGRAMS TO ASSIST LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN FINANCING WATER RELATED PROJECTS, THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES OFFERED BY THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD, AND SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 2, A PROPOSED TEXAS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROVIDING FOR WATER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BONDS.

WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges the critical water supply and water quality needs of the State of Texas, and of the communities of West Texas; and, WHEREAS, municipalities and local government entities in West Texas are addressing critical water supply and quality needs through water related projects that require effective and efficient means of financing the infrastructure for those projects; and, WHEREAS, the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) has been a resource utilized by municipalities and local government entities in West Texas for the financing of water projects, and has been instrumental to the City of San Angelo’s water development plan and Hickory Pipeline Project in particular; and, WHEREAS, Proposition 2 would amend the Texas State Constitution to authorize the TWDB to issue additional general obligation bonds on a continuing basis for one or more accounts of the Texas Water Development Fund II; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO THAT: SECTION 1 The City Council for the City of San Angelo hereby declares its support of Proposition 2, a proposed Texas Constitutional amendment providing for water financial assistance bonds. SECTION 2 This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2011.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:

Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Approved as to Content: ______________________________ _______________________________ Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Harold Dominguez, City Manager

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ACCEPTING THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION’S FY-2011 GRANT NO. 3-48-0191-032-2011 ESTIMATED AT $1,089,278.00 FOR PROJECT COSTS FOR TERMINAL BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A GRANT AGREEMENT THEREFORE, INCLUDING PROVISION OBLIGATING THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO TO PAY UP TO 5% OF PROJECT COSTS FUNDED BY THE GRANT, NOT TO EXCEED $54,464.00; AND, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, annually the City of San Angelo applies for a grant under the FAA’s Airport Improvement Program (AIP) for improvements to the San Angelo Regional Airport; and, WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo’s application for grant funds to upgrade the municipal airport terminal building under the FAA’s Airport Improvement Program dated August 25, 2011, has been approved; and, WHEREAS, in order to accept the grant funds the City of San Angelo must enter into a Grant Agreement, Grant Number 3-48-0191-032-2011, with the United States Federal Aviation Administration providing for terminal improvements estimated at $1,089,278.00, for a maximum obligation of the United States in the sum of $1,034,814.00, and a maximum obligation of the City of San Angelo of $54,464.00; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. The City Council for the City of San Angelo, Texas, hereby accepts the United States Federal Aviation Administration Grant Number 3-48-0191-032-2011, obligating the United States in a sum not to exceed $1,034,814.00, and obligating the City for 5% of project costs, not to exceed $54,464.00. The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute a Grant Agreement with the United States Federal Aviation Administration for said grant, and related documents. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and approval. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2011.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: Alvin W. New, Mayor Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM Luis Elguezabal, Director Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney City of San Angelo Regional Airport

MEMORANDUM Date: August 30, 2011 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Luis Elguezabal, A.A.E., Airport Director Subject: Consideration for 09-06-11 meeting Contact: Luis Elguezabal, A.A.E., Airport, 325-659-6409 or Extension-1010 Caption: Consent Agenda:

CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO ACCEPT THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION’S FY-2011 GRANT (GRANT No. 32) ESTIMATED AT $1,089,278 FOR IMPROVEMENTS AT SAN ANGELO REGIONAL AIRPORT.

Summary: Each year the airport applies for a grant under the FAA's Airport Improvement Program

(AIP). The AIP is authorized by Title-49 of the United States Code. The AIP's objective is to provide funding for airport capital improvement projects.

Grant No. 32 is for the rehabilitation and upgrades of the airport’s terminal building. The federal share of this Grant is $1,034,814. The City is obligated to pay 5% of the cost of all FAA funded projects, in this case that estimated sum is $54,464. The airport will fund this obligation through the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) program.

The FAA requests that the grant be accepted, attorney certified, and executed by September 16, 2011.

Financial Impact: This grant generates federal funds that are augmented by Passenger Facility

Charges for a total of $1,089,278 for the City of San Angelo. Related Vision Item: Adequately maintain infrastructure • Transportation Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Attachments: FAA Grant Agreement and Resolution Presentation: None Publication: None Reviewed by Director: Luis Elguezabal, Airport, 08-30-11

Adopted: 5/30/03 Revised: 1/16/08

City of San Angelo

Memo Date: August 8, 2011

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Veronica Sanchez, HR Manager

Subject: Agenda Item for September 13, 2011 Council Meeting

Contact: Veronica Sanchez, Human Resources, (325) 657-4221

Caption: Consent Item

Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute an amendment to the City of San Angelo PARS Section 457 RICA Alternative Retirement Plan to comply with recent legislation and regulations applicable to the plan, and to take such additional actions necessary to maintain the City’s participation in PARS and to maintain PARS compliance with applicable regulations issued or as may be issued.

Summary: There have been some legislative changes that require an amendment to the current PARS contract. These changes alter Section 2.5 – “Coordination With Other Plans”; Section 4.2 – “In Service Distributions”; Section 4.3 – “Qualified Domestic Relations Order”; Section 4.4 – “Direct Rollovers”. History: PARS is an alternative retirement program to social security for part-time employees. The PARS contract was approved and implemented effective May 1, 2007.

Financial Impact: None Related Vision Item (if applicable): N/A

Other Information/Recommendation: Staff has no concern of negative impact with approval of said amendment. Attachments: Resolution, original contract and applicable amendment to contract Presentation: N/A Publication: N/A Reviewed by Service Area Director: Lisa Marley, Director of Human Resources

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO PARS SECTION 457 FICA ALTERNATIVE RETIREMENT PLAN TO COMPLY WITH RECENT LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS APPPLICABLE TO THE PLAN, AND TO TAKE SUCH ADDITIONAL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN PARS AND TO MAINTAIN PARS COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS ISSUED OR AS MAY BE ISSUED

WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo has previously adopted the City of San Angelo Public Agency Retirement System Section 457 FICA Alternative Retirement Plan (the “Plan); and, WHEREAS, City Council has determined that it is desirable to amend the Plan to comply with recent legislation and regulations applicable to the Plan; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT: The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or his designee to execute an Amendment to The City of San Angelo PARS Section 457 FICA Alternative Retirement Plan, amending the Plan as necessary to comply with applicable legislation and regulations, and to take whatever additional actions are necessary to maintain the City’s participation in PARS and to maintain PARS compliance of any relevant regulation issued or as may be issued. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2011. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: Alvin New, Mayor Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM Veronica Sanchez, H.R. Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MASTER GRANT AGREEMENT; RATIFYING THE EXECUTION OF THE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MASTER GRANT AGREEMENT; APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE MASTER GRANT AGREEMENT; AND, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, federal and state laws require that the State and sub-recipients of public transportation grants, such as the City of San Angelo, meet certain contract standards relating to the management and administration of state and federal funds; and, WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo has periodically applied for public transportation grants and expects to obtain such grant funds in the future and therefore desires to comply with all of the requirements set forth in order to qualify for such grant funds; and, WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo has previously entered into a Public Transportation Master Grant Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation which agreement expires during this fiscal year and therefore the new Master Grant Agreement is required; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. In order to fulfill the requirements of applicable federal and state laws that require that the State and the City of San Angelo, a sub-recipient of public transportation grants, enter into a Public Transportation Master Grant Agreement in order to qualify for public transportation grant funds, the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute a Public Transportation Master Grant Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation, and related documents. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby ratifies the Public Transportation Master Grant Agreement entered into by the City Manager or his designee and the Texas Department of Transportation, effective upon expiration of the Master Grant Agreement expiring during the current fiscal year. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and approval. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2011.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: Alvin New, Mayor Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM Shawn Lewis, Community & Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Economic Development Director

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date: August 30, 2011

To: Mayor and City Council members

From: Kari LeBoeuf, Planner

Subject: Z 11-10, a proposal to change the zoning from RS-1 (Single-Family Residence) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) on the following property:

Location: 528 Country Club Road, located on the northwest corner of

Country Club Road and US Hwy 277, specifically 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, in southwest San Angelo.

Contacts: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager 325-657-4210 Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an

Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-10: San Angelo Planning Commission

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot at northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277, specifically 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, abstract number 0037, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary: The site was the subject of a sign variance request at the June 20, 2011 Planning Commission meeting. At that time, the Planning Commission directed the planning staff to initiate a zone change to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) on this property. Thus, we initiated the request at their direction. In considering this application, the City Council may:

(1) recommend approving the proposed zone change;

(2) modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be

more appropriate; or

(3) recommend denying the proposed zone change. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:

North PD single-family residence, commercial East RS-1, ML Frontage Rd, US Hwy 87 South RS-1 single-family residences West RS-1 single-family residences

Background:

In June 2011, a representative from Southgate Church of Christ requested from the Planning Commission a variance from the sign ordinance so that they could have a 24’ tall, 162 square foot large sign on their property. They desire this large sign to address their lack of visibility from Highway 87/277 to the east. The Planning Commission granted the variance with the condition that a zone change for the subject property be brought forward for action by the planning staff. This rezoning, from RS-1 to CN, would more accurately represent the unique features of this location, while still providing a buffer for the residences, primarily located to the south and west. The type of signage the church would like to place is allowed by right in commercial zoning districts and more appropriate in those types of areas.

Analysis: The subject property, as mentioned above, is located at the intersection of two local streets. This intersection, however, is only approximately 400 feet north of the intersection of US Highway 87/277 and Grand Canal Road. The highway is, obviously, a heavily traveled thoroughfare and Grand Canal is a major arterial which is intended to provide high-speed traffic movement and act as the backbone of a street network, carrying cars from centers of activity to the rest of the community. The subject property is currently zoned RS-1, with a conditional use approved to allow nonresidential. Sections 12.604.a.2.A, 12.604.a.2.B, and 12.604.a.2.C of the Sign Ordinance state that no sign for a nonresidential use in a residential zone may exceed a maximum of 64 square feet in size, exceed a maximum of 8 feet in height, nor have more than one sign per street frontage, respectively. The larger sign that was allowed by the variance granted would fall well within the acceptable range for signage in a commercial district. With the zone change from RS-1 to CN, the sign would then fully conform to zoning ordinance regulations. The Neighborhood Commercial zoning classification is the least intensive of the commercial classifications and would therefore be the least intrusive to the surrounding residential areas. The intensity of CN-allowed uses would have little, if any, adverse impact on the neighborhood, especially since the infrastructure to contain traffic is immediately adjacent; thus, traffic does not have to wind through residential streets to access the site. Additionally, the subject property already contains a substantial parking area such that commercial parking would not invade the neighboring residential areas. Any other commercial zoning classification would be too intensive for the area. In addition, the use of Neighborhood Commercial zoning here would function just as it is intended to; to buffer a residential area from a nearby high-speed thoroughfare. Also, CN would provide a buffer from the ML (Light Manufacturing) zoning district immediately to the east of the subject property as well as the CH (Heavy Commercial) zoning district immediately to the south. Further, such a change is consistent with the “neighborhood” classification called for in the Vision Plan map component of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to approve this zone change request as presented. Planning staff received three (3) written favorable responses to the zone change notification.

Recommendation:

The Planning Commission and City staff recommends approving this zone change request as presented.

Notification: Twenty-eight (28) owners of nearby property were

formally notified of this application for zone change. Related Vision Item: City Council Commerce Vision Revitalize older commercial areas Compatibility of adjoining commercial and

neighborhood districts

Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property of proposed zone change;

excerpt from zoning map, highlighting properties with

written favorable comments on proposed zone change;

aerial photo of same vicinity (as above-mentioned

map) highlighting subject property of proposed zone change; and

draft ordinance.

Presentation: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot at northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277, specifically 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, abstract number 0037, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: Z 11-10: San Angelo Planning Commission

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing

body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, abstract number 0037, located at the northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277 in south central San Angelo shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District. The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment: SEVERABILITY:

The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY:

Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.

INTRODUCED on the 30th day of August, 2011 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 6th day of September, 2011. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

by:_______________________________

Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: by:_________________________________

Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

EXHIBIT “A” legal description of area bounded by zone change case number Z 11-10, as proposed by the Planning Commission for City of San Angelo, Texas: BEGINNING at a point at the intersection of the west line of right-of-way for South US Highway 277 Frontage Road and the north line of right-of-way for Country Club Road; THENCE in a northwestern direction along the west line of right-of-way for South US Highway 277 Frontage Road to a point at the intersection of said west line of right-of-way for South US Highway 277 Frontage Road and the south line of the Crossings subdivision at the southeastern corner of Section 1 Lot 1; THENCE in a western direction along the south line of the Crossings subdivision Section 1 to a point at the intersection of said subdivision and Trinity Park subdivision Section 1 Lot 9 and Lot 8; THENCE in a southward direction along the west line of the Trinity Park subdivision to a point at the intersection of Trinity Park subdivision Section 1 Lot 1 and the north line of the right-of-way for Country Club Road; THENCE in an eastward direction along the north line of right-of-way for Country Club Road to the point of the BEGINNING.

l Page 1

City of San Angelo Finance Department

Memo Date: August 17, 2011

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Don Maynard, Budget Manager

Subject: Agenda Item for August 30, 2012 Council Meeting

Contact: Don Maynard, Budget Manager, 481-2757

Caption: Regular Item

FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2012; ADOPTING EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SCHEDULES; PROVIDING FOR THE GENERAL APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER APPROPRIATIONS BUDGETED; RATIFYING TRANSFERS OF APPROPRIATIONS OCCURRING IN THE 2010-2011 FISCAL YEAR AND AMENDING THAT BUDGET ORDINANCE ACCORDINGLY; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE POWER, ONLY AS PERMITTED BY LAW, TO AMEND OR MAKE CHANGES IN THE BUDGET FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES; PROVIDING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO MAKE CERTAIN ADJUSTMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME IN OR BETWEEN BUDGETED ALLOCATIONS; AND, PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE BUDGET

THIS BUDGET WILL RAISE LESS TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES THAN LAST YEAR’S BUDGET BY $163,572 (-0.60%), AND OF THAT AMOUNT, $530,877 IS TAX REVENUE TO BE RAISED FROM NEW PROPERTY ADDED TO THE ROLL THIS YEAR

Summary: This is the first public hearing and introduction of the budget ordinance for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011 and ending September 30, 2012.The ordinance appropriates funds for the 2011-2012 Fiscal Year (Exhibit A), and approves the Pay Schedule for all City employees (Exhibit B). It also determines and approves budget amendment authorizations for the City Council and the City Manager. Lastly, the ordinance authorizes the City Manager to apply for the grants listed in Exhibit C and execute any documents related to the grants, including agreements accepting those listed grants. History: Staff has discussed with Council during June, July, and August 2011 the budget, budget process, and proposed property tax rate of $0.7860/$100 valuation. City Council voted on $0.7975/$100 valuation, but gave direction to lower to $0.7860/$100 valuation if possible. The proposed budget is based on the $0.7860/$100 valuation.

l Page 2

Financial Impact: See the attached budget ordinance and related exhibits. Related Vision Item (if applicable): Financial Vision. Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the budget ordinance as presented. Attachments: Budget Ordinance and Exhibits A – C; Financial Summary for the 2011-2012

Budget Presentation: Yes Publication: August 2, 2011 – Notice of Effective Tax Rate August 18, 2011 – Notice of Public Hearing on the City Budget informing the

citizens of the public hearings on August 30 and September 6, 2011. Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, Finance

City of San Angelo, Texas

Financial Summary

October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012

City of San AngeloConsolidated Statement of Funds

Schedule of Revenues and ExpendituresFiscal Year Beginning October 1, 2011

Fund Beginning Operating Transfers Amount Operating Transfers Total Rev Over/ EndingNo. Fund Name Balance Revenues In Available Expenditures Out Expenditures (Under) Exp Balance

101 General $4,566,864 $55,466,577 $820,000 $60,853,441 $52,274,327 $4,012,250 $56,286,577 $0 $4,566,864105 General Debt Service 146,740 2,794,330 2,105,894 5,046,964 4,900,224 0 4,900,224 0 146,740501 Equipment Replacement 23,500 52,000 1,201,373 1,276,873 1,253,373 0 1,253,373 0 23,500502 Capital Projects 55,773 2,072 1,670,954 1,728,799 1,673,026 0 1,673,026 0 55,773103 Intergovernmental 320,431 2,153,343 373,715 2,847,489 2,527,058 0 2,527,058 0 320,431106 TIRZ (797,357) 465,229 0 (332,128) 465,229 0 465,229 0 (797,357)453 Community Development Block Grant 0 850,827 0 850,827 850,827 0 850,827 0 0483 HOME Grant 0 468,019 0 468,019 468,019 0 468,019 0 0601 Designated Revenue (569) 5,600 0 5,031 5,600 0 5,600 0 (569)640 Lake Nasworthy Trust 10,250,010 637,000 0 10,887,010 50,000 76,500 126,500 510,500 10,760,510202 Golf Course (357,083) 0 75,000 (282,083) 75,000 0 75,000 0 (357,083)203 Texas Bank Sports Complex 91,450 113,000 427,651 632,101 540,651 0 540,651 0 91,450410 Civic Events (80,922) 1,841,400 0 1,760,478 1,841,400 0 1,841,400 0 (80,922)420 Fort Concho 42,542 529,750 301,431 873,723 831,181 0 831,181 0 42,542440 Fairmount Cemetery (191,241) 304,750 16,732 130,241 321,482 0 321,482 0 (191,241)201 State Office Building 75,277 1,189,800 0 1,265,077 1,106,214 0 1,106,214 83,586 158,863220 Airport Operating 407,409 1,380,503 0 1,787,912 1,380,503 0 1,380,503 0 407,409529 Airport PFC 574,314 203,481 0 777,795 0 203,481 203,481 0 574,314531 Airport Capital Projects 55,153 0 0 55,153 0 0 0 0 55,153230 Solid Waste Enterprise (2,442,233) 994,675 0 (1,447,558) 674,675 320,000 994,675 0 (2,442,233)240 Stormwater (147) 2,570,000 95,000 2,664,853 2,665,000 0 2,665,000 0 (147)260 Water Operating 1,473,921 23,359,296 208,290 25,041,507 23,567,586 0 23,567,586 0 1,473,921261 Water Debt Service 567,824 2,400 6,889,895 7,460,119 6,892,295 0 6,892,295 0 567,824510 Water Capital Projects 5,000 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 5,000512 Water / Supply Capital Projects 6,053 6,186,000 0 6,192,053 4,682,105 1,503,895 6,186,000 0 6,053270 Wastewater Operating 3,206,635 10,165,600 0 13,372,235 4,980,538 5,150,826 10,131,364 34,236 3,240,871271 Wastewater Debt Service 579,285 5,000 4,412,220 4,996,505 4,417,220 0 4,417,220 0 579,285520 Wastewater Capital Projects 1,025,216 1,706,000 0 2,731,216 1,249,280 456,720 1,706,000 0 1,025,216

Operating Totals $19,603,845 $113,446,652 $18,598,155 $151,648,652 $119,692,813 $11,723,672 $131,416,485 $628,322 $20,232,167

301 Vehicle Maintenance $113,365 $6,604,908 $0 $6,718,273 $6,604,908 $0 $6,604,908 $0 $113,365305 Communications 11,165 825,321 0 836,486 717,013 0 717,013 108,308 119,473310 City Health 321,061 8,049,213 0 8,370,274 8,046,921 0 8,046,921 2,292 323,353320 Property/Casualty 1,881,811 597,051 0 2,478,862 597,051 0 597,051 0 1,881,811330 Workers' Compensation 2,108,435 989,294 0 3,097,729 989,294 0 989,294 0 2,108,435

Total Internal Service Funds $4,435,837 $17,065,787 $0 $21,501,624 $16,955,187 $0 $16,955,187 $110,600 $4,546,437

Other GrandFunds Total

Funding Sources

Property Taxes 25,195,798 465,229 2,786,446 28,447,473Other Taxes 19,817,974 1,390,000 21,207,974Licenses and Permits 643,584 643,584Grants 3,134,711 300,000 3,434,711Charges for Services 5,850,859 337,478 1,336,750 539,000 47,088,824 17,046,391 72,199,302Fines & Forfeitures 3,289,925 3,289,925Interest & Miscellaneous 482,401 5,600 2,150 98,000 15,284 366,531 19,396 989,362Other Financing Sources 3,932,435 373,715 880,814 13,408,009 303,290 18,898,263

Total Revenues & Other 59,212,976 4,316,733 3,609,714 637,000 16,209,739 48,058,645 17,065,787 149,110,594 Financing Sources

Beginning Fund Balances 1,846,821 (477,495) (138,171) 10,250,010 146,740 7,975,940 4,435,837 24,039,682

Total Available Resources 61,059,797 3,839,238 3,471,543 10,887,010 16,356,479 56,034,585 21,501,624 173,150,276

Expenditures

General Government 4,668,940 151,872 1,583,984 6,404,796Human Resources & Risk Mgt. 478,980 9,633,266 10,112,246Administrative Svcs. 2,258,886 717,013 2,975,899Community & Eco. Develop. 2,617,657 720,729 3,338,386Neighborhood & Family Svcs. 400,094 2,438,322 2,838,416Police & Fire 29,265,602 5,600 29,271,202Operations 7,281,978 6,604,908 13,886,886Parks & Rec 3,649,716 435,743 3,534,714 680,802 8,300,975Health 924,217 564,467 1,488,684Water & Wastewater 126,500 41,590,950 41,717,450Stormwater 2,665,000 2,665,000Debt Service 16,204,739 425,412 16,630,151Other 8,736,581 5,000 8,741,581

Total Expenditures 60,282,651 4,316,733 3,534,714 126,500 16,209,739 46,946,148 16,955,187 148,371,672

Ending Fund Balances 777,146 (477,495) (63,171) 10,760,510 146,740 9,088,437 4,546,437 24,778,604

Total Fund Commitments & Fund Balances 61,059,797 3,839,238 3,471,543 10,887,010 16,356,479 56,034,585 21,501,624 173,150,276

CITY OF SAN ANGELOBUDGET SUMMARY BY FUND TYPE

FY 2011-2012

General Fund*

Special Revenue

Debt Service

Enterprise Fund

Internal Service

Expendable Trust

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Category Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

101 REVENUES: Taxes Property Tax 24,247,972 25,393,541 25,195,798 ($197,743)

Sales Tax 14,002,075 12,552,401 13,635,690 1,083,289Franchise Tax 4,947,607 5,161,627 6,182,284 1,020,657

Total Taxes 43,197,654 43,107,569 45,013,772 1,906,203

Licenses and Licenses 22,265 40,000 35,330 (4,670)Permits Permits 567,933 727,664 608,254 (119,410)

Total Permits and Fees 590,198 767,664 643,584 (124,080)

Charges for Ambulance 2,288,799 2,155,000 2,260,000 105,000Services Recreation 536,631 549,617 670,735 121,118

River Stage 0 0 0 0Animal Control 99,406 186,375 142,074 (44,301)Public Safety 584,048 518,120 509,295 (8,825)Other 1,568,466 2,393,053 2,268,755 (124,298)

Total Charges for Service 5,077,350 5,802,165 5,850,859 48,694

Fines and Municipal Court 3,231,844 2,994,150 3,289,925 295,775Forfeitures

Interest and Interest 4,977 70,000 40,000 (30,000)Miscellaneous Miscellaneous 253,769 446,990 390,401 (56,589)

Total Interest and Miscellaneous 258,746 516,990 430,401 (86,589)

Transfers In 888,167 4,629,804 820,000 (3,809,804)Administrative Charges 163,975 238,036 238,036 0

Total General Fund Revenues 53,407,934 58,056,378 56,286,577 2,040,003

City of San AngeloGeneral Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

Franchise Tax

Fines & Forfeitures

Transfers In

Licenses & Permits

Interest & Misc.

Admin. Charges

City of San AngeloGeneral Fund RevenuesFiscal Year 2011‐2012

Graph Description:The property tax is the largest revenue source for the City of San Angelo. Property, sales and franchise taxesaccount for almost 80% of the General Fund's revenue. All other revenue sources combined total approximately 20% of General Fund Revenue.

0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000

Property Tax

Sales Tax

Charges for Service

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Category Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

101 EXPENDITURES:

General City Council 119,564 121,743 121,543 ($200)Government City Manager 822,374 606,464 617,388 10,924

Legal 724,242 579,036 596,545 17,509City Clerk 255,983 215,433 221,479 6,046Public Information 150,927 146,113 149,540 3,427Municipal Court 2,170,575 2,762,974 2,244,783 (518,191)Construction Management 65,610 246,366 133,213 (113,153)Facilities Maintenance 262,296 557,043 584,449 27,406

Total General Government 4,571,571 5,235,172 4,668,940 (566,232)

Human Resources Human Resources 355,491 378,025 364,785 (13,240)& Risk Mgt. Youth Employment 19,032 0 0 0

Crossing Guards 117,223 114,195 114,195 0Total Human Resources

& Risk Mgt. 491,746 492,220 478,980 (13,240)

Administrative Finance 403,419 408,016 473,348 65,332Services Accounting 475,533 465,470 478,414 12,944

Billing & Receipts 0 551,379 559,098 7,719Information Technology 602,841 608,564 551,471 (57,093)Purchasing 149,103 169,856 174,814 4,958Property Management 16,453 31,741 21,741 (10,000)

Total Administrative Services 1,647,349 2,235,026 2,258,886 23,860

Community & Development Corporation 0 180,581 139,362 (41,219)Economic Develop. Administration 233,506 201,145 130,993 (70,152)

Engineering 524,973 486,672 509,678 23,006Planning 283,845 269,446 259,600 (9,846)GIS 189,423 193,962 237,163 43,201Permits & Inspections 690,812 698,539 717,641 19,102Fire Marshal 622,043 629,771 623,220 (6,551)

Total Community &Economic Develop. 2,544,602 2,660,116 2,617,657 (42,459)

Neighborhood & Code Compliance 319,029 373,817 400,094 26,277Family Services

Total Neighborhood & Family Svcs 319,029 373,817 400,094 26,277

City of San AngeloGeneral Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Category Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

Health Services Health Administration 80,339 57,006 110,506 53,500Animal Services 760,197 730,088 758,288 28,200Social Service Contribution 55,423 55,423 55,423 0

Total Health Services 895,959 842,517 924,217 81,700

Police Police 14,681,579 14,362,951 14,639,314 276,363DARE Program 8,501 0 0 0Traffic Safety 263,869 206,516 209,184 2,668DWI Step 36,154 38,722 39,222 500Public Safety Communications 1,248,059 1,219,255 1,233,522 14,267

Total Police 16,238,162 15,827,444 16,121,242 293,798

Fire Fire/Ambulance 13,495,994 12,678,381 13,144,360 465,979

Total Fire 13,495,994 12,678,381 13,144,360 465,979

Operations Operations Admin 385,190 318,520 328,186 9,666Signal System 743,576 785,542 801,584 16,042Street and Bridge 2,279,063 2,355,687 2,365,678 9,991Street Lighting 978,512 1,118,829 1,118,829 68,912

Total Operations 4,386,341 4,578,578 4,614,277 35,699

Parks & Rec Parks 2,381,936 2,422,800 2,473,738 50,938Water Lily Garden 97,180 86,100 86,100 0Recreation 1,127,601 950,572 1,014,878 64,306

Total Parks & Rec 3,606,717 3,459,472 3,574,716 115,244

Other Non-Departmental 2,892,667 3,304,557 3,470,958 166,401Transfers Out 2,331,511 2,970,077 4,012,250 1,042,173

Total Other 5,224,178 6,274,634 7,483,208 1,208,574

Total General Fund Expenditures $53,421,648 $54,657,377 $56,286,577 $1,629,200

Increase/(Decrease) in Fund Balance (13,714) 3,399,001 0 ($3,399,001)

Beginning Fund Balance 1,181,577 1,167,863 4,566,864 3,399,001

Ending Fund Balance $1,167,863 $4,566,864 $4,566,864 $0

City of San AngeloGeneral Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

General Government8%

Human Resources & Risk Mgt.1%

Administrative Services4%

Health Services 2%

Neighborhood & Family Svcs.1%

Parks & Recreation6%

Operations8%

Parks & Rec.6%

Other13%

City of San AngeloGeneral Fund

Expenditures by DepartmentFiscal Year 2011‐2012

Graph Description:The graph above shows the City's commitment to provide a safe environment for its citizens by devoting 52% of authorized expenditures for the use of public safety.

Police29%

Fire23%

Operations & Maintenance

19%

Transfers Out7%

CITY OF SAN ANGELOGeneral Fund Expenditures by Category

Fiscal Year 2011‐2012

Graph Description:The single largest General Fund expense for the City of San Angelo is personnel. This category consists of salaryand benefits for employees. Operations & maintenance and transfers account for just over one quarter of GeneralFund expenses.

Personnel 74%

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current105 REVENUES:

Current Taxes 3,178,833 2,683,815 2,744,330 $60,515Delinquent Taxes 54,396 35,000 42,116 7,116Transfers In 2,037,475 2,035,713 2,105,894 70,181Interest 3,420 6,000 7,884 1,884

Total Revenues $5,274,124 $4,760,528 $4,900,224 $139,696

105 EXPENSES:

Principal on Debt 3,616,500 2,849,178 2,948,543 99,365Interest on Debt 2,146,582 1,867,832 1,946,681 78,849Issue Costs 9,350 5,000 5,000 0

Total Expenditures $5,772,432 $4,722,010 $4,900,224 $178,214

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses (498,308) 38,518 0 (38,518)

Beginning Fund Balance 606,530 108,222 146,740 38,518

Ending Fund Balance $108,222 $146,740 $146,740 $0

City of San AngeloGeneral Debt Service Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expense

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

501 REVENUES:

Transfers In 814,144 1,218,857 1,201,373 (17,484)Sale of Fixed Assets 39,939 50,000 50,000 $0Other 11,276 3,790 2,000 (1,790)

Total Revenue $865,359 $1,272,647 $1,253,373 ($19,274)

501 EXPENDITURES:

Vehciles & Equipment 1,314,257 1,281,813 1,253,373 (28,440)

Total Expenditures $1,314,257 $1,281,813 $1,253,373 ($28,440)

Excess of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (448,898) (9,166) 0 9,166

Beginning Fund Balance 481,564 32,666 23,500 (9,166)

Ending Fund Balance $32,666 $23,500 $23,500 $0

City of San AngeloGeneral Fund Equipment Replacement

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

502 REVENUES:

Transfers In 525,000 620,954 1,670,954 $1,050,000Other Revenue 75,615 906,756 2,072 (904,684)

Total Revenue $600,615 $1,527,710 $1,673,026 $145,316

502 EXPENDITURES

City Hall Plaza Rehabilitation 102,838 874,778 0 ($874,778)Street Improvements 241 254,554 1,673,026 1,418,472Aquatics Facility 0 500,000 0 (500,000)Police Facility 0 120,000 0 (120,000)Fire Machinery 0 250,000 0 (250,000)

Total Expenditures $103,079 $1,999,332 $1,673,026 ($326,306)

Excess of Revenues over (under) Expenditures 497,536 (471,622) 0 471,622

Beginning Fund Balance 29,859 527,395 55,773 (471,622)

Ending Fund Balance $527,395 $55,773 $55,773 $0

City of San AngeloGeneral Fund Capital Projects

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Actual Budget Budget Current

103 REVENUES: Health Department Revenue 177,380 157,000 166,000 9,000Health Department Grants 1,661,448 2,372,283 1,249,160 (1,123,123)Transportation Grant 208,708 553,500 255,500 (298,000)Nutrition Program Revenue 184,563 201,534 171,478 (30,056)Police Grants 266,219 61,300 0 (61,300)Parks Grants and Donations 238,785 899,871 175,000 (724,871)Planning Grants and Donations 1,124,922 46,827 0 (46,827)Emergency Management Grant 181,175 108,205 136,205 28,000Historical Commission 0 20,000 0 (20,000)Fire Prevention Grant 2,500 0 0 0Interest 1,569 0 0 0Transfers In 757,211 380,987 373,715 (7,272)

Total Revenue 4,804,480 4,801,507 2,527,058 (2,274,449)

103 EXPENDITURES:

Nursing 298,754 305,872 296,051 (9,821)Environmental Health Services 40,595 52,790 48,430 (4,360)RLSS/LPHS 139,897 142,658 119,443 (23,215)Bioterrorism 53,195 171,514 100,543 (70,971)WIC 938,857 1,652,016 970,772 (681,244)Social Services 776,958 474,274 148,704 (325,570)Transportation Planning Grant 210,394 553,500 255,500 (298,000)Nutrition 259,892 289,223 260,743 (28,480)Police Grants 261,083 63,355 0 (63,355)Parks 343,015 798,058 175,000 (623,058)Down-town Façade 1,121,210 50,539 0 (50,539)Emergency Management 196,662 245,357 151,872 (93,485)Historical Grant 48,129 18,992 0 (18,992)Fire Prevention 385 2,114 0 (2,114)Transfers Out 0 254,202 0 (254,202)

Total Expenditures 4,689,026 5,074,464 2,527,058 (1,432,225)

Excess /(Deficiency) of Revenue over Expenses 115,454 (272,957) 0 $272,957

Beginning Fund Balance 477,934 593,388 320,431 (272,957)

Ending Fund Balance $593,388 $320,431 $320,431 $0

City of San AngeloIntergovernmental Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

104 REVENUES:

Interest 153 0 0 0

Total Revenue $153 $0 $0 $0

104 EXPENDITURES

Capital Outlay 28,446 0 0 0

Total Expenditures $28,446 $0 $0 $0

Excess of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (28,293) 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance 28,293 0 0 0

Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0

City of San AngeloNarcotics Awarded Forfeitures

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current106 REVENUES:

Downtown Property Tax 110,459 22,276 134,085 $111,809North Property Tax 348,342 313,608 331,144Interest 4,695 0 0 0

Total Revenues $463,496 $335,884 $465,229 $129,345

106 EXPENSES:

Downtown Projects 3,110 174,576 134,085North Projects 48,378 1,111,308 331,144 (780,164)

Total Expenditures $51,488 $1,285,884 $465,229 ($820,655)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 412,008 (950,000) 0 950,000

Beginning Fund Balance (259,365) 152,643 (797,357) (950,000)

Ending Fund Balance $152,643 ($797,357) ($797,357) $0

City of San AngeloTIRZ FUND

Schedule of Revenues and Expense

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

Current Proposed from FY11Description Budget Budget Current

453 REVENUES:

Grant Income 1,068,247 808,977 ($259,270)Rehab Loans 46,500 41,850 (4,650)Transfers In 60,000 0 (60,000)

Total Revenues $1,174,747 $850,827 ($323,920)

453 EXPENDITURES:

Administration 337,433 335,462 ($1,971)Debt Service 40,000 175,000 135,000Public Service Projects 299,000 104,000 (195,000)Rehab Grants and Loans 438,314 236,365 (201,949)

Total Expenditures $1,114,747 $850,827 ($263,920)

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 60,000 0 (60,000)

Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0

Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $0

City of San AngeloCommunity Development Block Grant

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

Current Proposed from FY11Description Budget Budget Current

483 REVENUES:

Grant Income 580,872 402,019 ($178,853)Rent 34,000 34,000 0Loan Payments 25,000 22,000 (3,000)Miscellaneous 0 10,000 10,000

Total Revenues $639,872 $468,019 ($171,853)

483 EXPENDITURES:

Administration 71,958 76,401 $4,443Galilee CDC 120,000 75,000 (45,000)MHMR Contribution 58,699 58,000 (699)Tenant-Based Rental Assistance 10,215 0 (10,215)Homebuyers Assistance 90,000 93,000 3,000Neighborhood Revitalization 155,000 155,618 618Low Income Housing Tax Credits 124,000 0 (124,000)Duplex Maintenance 10,000 10,000 0

Total Expenditures $639,872 $468,019 ($171,853)

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 0 0 0

Beginning Balance 0 0 0

Ending Balance $0 $0 $0

City of San AngeloHOME Program

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

601 REVENUES:

Police Donations 6,079 7,100 5,600 (1,500)Parks Donations 7,202 227,750 0 (227,750)Recreation Donations 3,412 900 0 (900)Other Donations 9,862 33,000 0 (33,000)Interest 1,165 0 0 0

Total Revenue $27,720 $268,750 $5,600 ($263,150)

601 EXPENDITURES

Police Projects 13,292 78,212 5,600 (72,612)Parks Projects 7,614 262,754 0 (262,754)Recreation Projects 4,775 16,606 0 (16,606)Other 26,952 84,869 0 (84,869)

Total Expenditures $52,633 $442,441 $5,600 ($436,841)

Excess of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (24,913) (173,691) 0 173,691

Beginning Fund Balance 198,035 173,122 (569) (173,691)

Ending Fund Balance $173,122 ($569) ($569) $0

City of San AngeloDesignated Revenue Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

640 REVENUES:

Lot Sales 198,880 515,000 520,000 5,000Lake Lease Income 19,558 33,000 19,000 ($14,000)Interest 89,976 85,000 98,000 13,000

Total Revenues $308,414 $633,000 $637,000 $4,000

640 EXPENDITURES:

Professional Services 9,254 50,000 50,000 $0Transfers Out 76,500 76,500 76,500 0

Total Expenditures $85,754 $126,500 $126,500 $0

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 222,660 506,500 510,500 4,000

Beginning Fund Balance 9,520,850 9,743,510 10,250,010 506,500

Ending Fund Balance $9,743,510 $10,250,010 $10,760,510 $510,500

City of San AngeloLake Nasworthy Trust

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

202 REVENUES:

Golf Fees 51,845 0 0 $0General Fund Transfer 20,000 75,000 75,000 0

Total Revenues $71,845 $75,000 $75,000 $0

202 EXPENDITURES:

Personnel 98,889 0 0 $0Operating Expense 57,679 75,000 75,000 0

Total Expenditures $156,568 $75,000 $75,000 $0

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures (84,723) 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance (272,360) (357,083) (357,083) 0

Ending Fund Balance ($357,083) ($357,083) ($357,083) $0

City of San AngeloGolf Course Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

203 REVENUES:

Program Fees 106,838 118,500 103,000 ($15,500)Transfers In 450,000 470,000 427,651 (42,349)Other Revenue 21,820 7,000 10,000 3,000

Total Revenues $578,658 $595,500 $540,651 ($54,849)

203 EXPENSES:

Facilities Maintenance 443,740 496,800 445,371 ($51,429)Sports Programs 69,084 96,200 95,280 (920)

Total Expenses $512,824 $593,000 $540,651 ($52,349)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 65,834 2,500 0 (2,500)

Beginning Fund Balance 23,116 88,950 91,450 2,500

Ending Fund Balance $88,950 $91,450 $91,450 $0

City of San AngeloTexas Bank Sports Complex Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

410 REVENUES:

Hotel/Motel Tax 1,420,333 1,411,058 1,390,000 ($21,058)Coliseum Revenue 197,138 228,300 221,000 (7,300)Auditorium Revenue 31,924 0 0 0Convention Center Revenue 149,940 134,200 156,000 21,800River Stage Revenue 13,022 30,500 13,000 (17,500)Pavilion Revenue 4,704 6,500 6,000 (500)Pecan Creek Revenue 5,025 3,500 10,400 6,900Other 42,563 42,000 45,000 3,000

Total Revenues $1,864,649 $1,856,058 $1,841,400 ($14,658)

410 EXPENDITURES:

Coliseum 189,328 203,836 202,650 ($1,186)Auditorium 22,158 0 0 0Convention Center 116,686 123,737 124,740 1,003River Stage 7,090 6,800 7,000 200Pavilion 1,360 1,500 1,000 (500)Administration 1,497,982 1,453,313 1,506,010 52,697Capital 42,552 0 0 0

Total Expenditures $1,877,156 $1,789,186 $1,841,400 $52,214

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures (12,507) 66,872 0 (66,872)

Beginning Fund Balance (135,287) (147,794) (80,922) 66,872

Ending Fund Balance ($147,794) ($80,922) ($80,922) $0

City of San AngeloCivic Events Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

420 REVENUES:

Sales & Donations 481,023 505,712 527,600 $21,888Transfers In 311,756 292,547 301,431 8,884Other 3,724 1,150 2,150 1,000

Total Revenues $796,503 $799,409 $831,181 $31,772

420 EXPENDITURES:

Personnel 564,578 554,831 575,952 $21,121Supplies and Maintenance 245,967 235,872 254,229 18,357Capital Outlay 0 1,000 1,000 0

Total Expenditures $810,545 $791,703 $831,181 $39,478

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures (14,042) 7,706 0 (7,706)

Beginning Fund Balance 48,878 34,836 42,542 7,706

Ending Fund Balance $34,836 $42,542 $42,542 $0

City of San AngeloFort Concho

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

440 REVENUES:

Charges for Service 239,932 255,150 254,750 ($400)Trust Income 43,278 50,000 50,000 0Transfers In 56,500 16,732 16,732 0Other Revenue (881) 0 0 0

Total Revenues $338,829 $321,882 $321,482 ($400)

440 EXPENDITURES:

Personnel 233,402 220,360 221,392 $1,032Operating Expense 90,988 101,522 100,090 (1,432)Capital 10,843 0 0

Total Expenditures $335,233 $321,882 $321,482 ($400)

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 3,596 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance (194,837) (191,241) (191,241) 0

Ending Fund Balance ($191,241) ($191,241) ($191,241) $0

City of San AngeloFairmount Cemetery

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

201 REVENUES:

Rental Income 1,159,996 1,175,762 1,182,800 $7,038Other Revenue 4,496 10,000 7,000 (3,000)

Total Revenues $1,164,492 $1,185,762 $1,189,800 $4,038

201 EXPENDITURES:

Personnel 110,616 99,789 105,208 $5,419Operating 573,625 1,205,616 575,594 (630,022)Debt Principal 483,500 345,822 345,822 0Debt Interest 142,701 78,590 78,590 0Issue costs 589 1,000 1,000 0

Total Expenditures $1,311,031 $1,730,817 $1,106,214 ($624,603)

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures (146,539) (545,055) 83,586 628,641

Beginning Fund Balance 766,871 620,332 75,277 (545,055)

Ending Fund Balance $620,332 $75,277 $158,863 $83,586

City of San AngeloState Office Building

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

220 REVENUES:

Leases/Rentals 1,120,008 1,127,736 1,073,076 (54,660)Concessions 140,565 286,000 242,950 (43,050)Landing Fees 45,013 41,400 31,977 (9,423)Advertising 22,265 20,000 25,000 5,000Interest 3,216 1,500 3,000 1,500Other Income 5,373 8,206 4,500 (3,706)

Total Revenues $1,336,440 $1,484,842 $1,380,503 ($104,339)

220 EXPENSES:

Personnel 682,706 724,444 677,314 (47,130)Operations 675,196 748,538 635,489 (113,049)Capital Outlay 34,352 63,022 67,700 4,678Transfers Out 50,000 0 0 0

Total Expenses $1,442,254 $1,536,004 $1,380,503 ($155,501)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses (105,814) (51,162) 0 51,162

Beginning Fund Balance 564,385 458,571 407,409 (51,162)

Ending Fund Balance $458,571 $407,409 $407,409 $0

City of San AngeloAirport Operating Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

529 REVENUES:

Passenger Facility Charges 229,434 328,284 201,450 (126,834)Interest 3,570 4,000 2,031 (1,969)

Total Revenues $233,004 $332,284 $203,481 ($128,803)

529 EXPENSES:

Transfer to Capital Fund 213,823 332,284 203,481 (128,803)

Total Expenses $213,823 $332,284 $203,481 ($128,803)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 19,181 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance 555,133 574,314 574,314 0

Ending Fund Balance $574,314 $574,314 $574,314 $0

City of San AngeloAirport PFC Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

531 REVENUES:

Transfers In 50,000 0 0 0Other 146 0 0 0

Total Revenues $50,146 $0 $0 $0

531 EXPENSES:

Capital Outlay 42,374 0 0 0

Total Expenses $42,374 $0 $0 $0

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 7,772 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance 47,381 55,153 55,153 0

Ending Fund Balance $55,153 $55,153 $55,153 $0

City of San AngeloAirport Capital Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

230 REVENUES:

Landfill Fees 777,659 850,000 850,000 0Leases 77,128 83,698 91,675 7,977Other 42,863 50,000 50,000 0Transfers In 0 344,082 0 (344,082)Interest 4,714 6,000 3,000 (3,000)

Total Revenues $902,364 $1,333,780 $994,675 ($339,105)

230 EXPENDITURES:

Maintenance and Utilities 175,674 191,500 171,500 (20,000)Inspection Fee 162,837 180,000 180,000 0Professional Services 383,765 546,400 322,175 (224,225)Capital 1,145 6,000 1,000 (5,000)Misc 10,000 0 0 0Debt Service 0 344,082 0 (344,082)Transfers Out 320,000 65,798 320,000 254,202

Total Expenditures $1,053,421 $1,333,780 $994,675 ($339,105)

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures (151,057) 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance (2,291,176) (2,442,233) (2,442,233) 0

Ending Fund Balance ($2,442,233) ($2,442,233) ($2,442,233) $0

City of San AngeloSolid Waste Enterprise Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

240 REVENUES:

Stormwater Fee 1,642,192 2,564,268 2,570,000 5,732Transfers In 0 95,000 95,000 0Other 8,657 0 0 0

Total Revenues $1,650,849 $2,659,268 $2,665,000 $5,732

240 EXPENSES:

Personnel 746,398 890,009 992,338 102,329Operations 408,156 581,151 494,972 (86,179)Capital 528,855 1,092,446 1,177,690 85,244

Total Expenses $1,683,409 $2,563,606 $2,665,000 $101,394

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses (32,560) 95,662 0 (95,662)

Beginning Fund Balance 0 (95,809) (147) 95,662

Ending Fund Balance ($95,809) ($147) ($147) $0

City of San AngeloStormwater Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

260 REVENUES:

Water Sales 11,967,192 12,945,000 20,376,000 $7,431,000Lake Use Revenues 309,508 376,476 390,296 13,820Billing and Collection 1,995,869 1,640,500 1,820,000 179,500Paving Cuts 23,306 15,000 17,500 2,500Taps and Connections 417,064 459,000 451,000 (8,000)Other Operating Revenue 113,596 41,500 71,500 30,000Aid to Construction 2,150 3,000 3,000 0Misc 187,593 0 200,000 200,000Transfers In 368,285 206,390 208,290 1,900Interest 17,434 50,000 30,000 (20,000)

Total Revenues $15,401,997 $15,736,866 $23,567,586 $7,830,720

260 EXPENSES:

Administration 3,946,079 4,360,258 5,358,118 997,860Supply 4,322,096 4,224,558 5,959,630 1,735,072Treatment 2,030,533 2,501,672 2,290,254 (211,418)Distribution 3,579,728 3,883,969 3,940,196 56,227Capital 1,427,077 1,116,717 633,388 (483,329)Transfers Out 0 0 5,386,000 5,386,000

Total Expenses $15,305,513 $16,087,174 $23,567,586 $7,480,412

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 96,484 (350,308) 0 350,308

Beginning Fund Balance 1,727,745 1,824,229 1,473,921 (350,308)

Ending Fund Balance $1,824,229 $1,473,921 $1,473,921 $0

City of San AngeloWater Enterprise Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

Water Sales86.5%

Lake Use Revenues1.7%

Billing and Collection7.7%

Taps and Connections1.9%

Other2.3%

CITY OF SAN ANGELOWater Enterprise Fund

FY 2011‐2012 Revenues by Source

CITY OF SAN ANGELO

Administration23%

Supply25%

Treatment10%

Distribution17%

Capital14%

Transfers Out23%

Water Enterprise FundFY 2011‐2012 Expenditures by Category

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

261 REVENUES:

Transfer in from Water 1,462,000 1,489,000 6,889,895 5,400,895Interest 3,039 3,420 2,400 (1,020)

Total Revenues $1,465,039 $1,492,420 $6,892,295 $5,399,875

261 EXPENDITURES:

Debt Service 1,474,157 1,492,417 6,892,295 5,399,878

Total Expenses $1,474,157 $1,492,417 $6,892,295 $5,399,878

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses (9,118) 3 0 (3)

Beginning Fund Balance 576,939 567,821 567,824 3

Ending Fund Balance $567,821 $567,824 $567,824 $0

City of San AngeloWater Debt Service Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

510 REVENUES:

Interest 980 5,000 0 (5,000)

Total Revenues $980 5,000 0 (5,000)

510 EXPENDITURES:Planning and Other 0 0 0 0Capital Improvements 162,909 0 0 0System Maintenance 0 0 0 0Transfer Out 23,895 0 0 0

Total Expenses $186,804 0 0 0

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses (185,824) 5,000 0 (5,000)

Beginning Fund Balance 185,824 0 5,000 5,000

Ending Fund Balance $0 $5,000 $5,000 $0

City of San AngeloWater Capital Projects Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

512 REVENUES:

Water Sales 5,463,187 5,851,000 5,851,000 0Grant Revenue 0 0 300,000 300,000Interest 31,826 50,000 35,000 (15,000)

Total Revenues $5,495,013 5,901,000 6,186,000 285,000

512 EXPENDITURES:

Capital Improvements 2,731,431 9,943,380 4,448,065 (5,495,315)Franchise Fee 218,528 234,040 234,040 0Transfers Out 1,462,000 1,489,000 1,503,895 14,895

Total Expenses $4,411,959 11,666,420 6,186,000 (5,480,420)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 1,083,054 (5,765,420) 0 5,765,420

Beginning Fund Balance 4,688,419 5,771,473 6,053 (5,765,420)

Ending Fund Balance $5,771,473 $6,053 $6,053 $0

City of San AngeloWater Supply Capital Projects

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

270 REVENUES:

Wastewater Charges 9,947,388 9,890,000 9,890,000 $0Farm Use Revenues 200,471 189,600 193,600 4,000Connections 17,825 15,000 15,000 0Paving Cuts 28,642 15,000 23,000 8,000Non-Refundable Aid 2,380 1,000 2,000 1,000Miscellaneous (25,746) 4,000 27,000 23,000Interest 6,311 20,000 15,000 (5,000)

Total Revenues $10,177,271 $10,134,600 $10,165,600 $31,000

270 EXPENSES:

Wastewater Treatment 2,428,292 2,830,118 2,829,210 (908)Wastewater Collection 1,042,408 1,265,965 1,326,328 60,363Administration 479,557 456,238 685,000 228,762Capital 314,839 306,549 140,000 (166,549)Transfers Out 4,156,823 5,274,076 5,150,826 (123,250)

Total Expenses $8,421,919 $10,132,946 $10,131,364 ($1,582)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 1,755,352 1,654 34,236 32,582

Beginning Fund Balance 1,449,629 3,204,981 3,206,635 1,654

Ending Fund Balance $3,204,981 $3,206,635 $3,240,871 $34,236

City of San AngeloWastewater Enterprise Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

Sewer Fees97%

Other3%

CITY OF SAN ANGELOWastewater Revenue by Source

FY 2011‐2012

Collection

CITY OF SAN ANGELOWastewater Expenses by Category

FY 2011‐2012Collection

13%

Treatment28%

Administration7%

Capital1%

Transfers Out51%

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

271 REVENUES:

Transfers In 3,899,593 4,399,320 4,412,220 12,900Interest 6,569 10,470 5,000 ($5,470)

Total Revenues $3,906,162 $4,409,790 $4,417,220 $7,430

271 EXPENDITURES:

Debt Service 4,403,034 4,400,020 4,417,220 17,200

Total Expenses $4,403,034 $4,400,020 $4,417,220 $17,200

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses (496,872) 9,770 0 (9,770)

Beginning Fund Balance 1,066,387 569,515 579,285 9,770

Ending Fund Balance $569,515 $579,285 $579,285 $0

City of San AngeloWastewater Debt Service Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

520 REVENUES:

Wastewater Charges 1,665,147 1,666,000 1,666,000 0Interest 38,305 65,000 40,000 -25,000

Total Revenues $1,703,452 $1,731,000 $1,706,000 ($25,000)

520 EXPENDITURES:

Capital Projects 581,913 6,961,614 1,182,640 (5,778,974)Franchise Fee 66,606 66,640 66,640Transfers Out 0 456,720 456,720 0

Total Expenses $648,519 $7,484,974 $1,706,000 ($5,778,974)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 1,054,933 (5,753,974) 0 5,753,974

Beginning Fund Balance 5,724,257 6,779,190 1,025,216 (5,753,974)

Ending Fund Balance $6,779,190 $1,025,216 $1,025,216 $0

City of San AngeloWastewater Capital Projects Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

301 REVENUES:

Gas and Oil 2,198,656 3,063,220 4,841,687 $1,778,467Material 783,803 630,000 750,000 120,000Labor 953,133 953,016 876,816 (76,200)Rent 120,000 120,000 120,000 0Transfers In 8,900 0 0 0Other Revenue 17,745 18,405 16,405 (2,000)

Total Revenues $4,082,237 $4,784,641 $6,604,908 $1,820,267

301 EXPENSES:

Personnel 797,437 843,150 851,571 $8,421Supplies and Maintenance 3,119,324 3,840,712 5,723,337 1,882,625Capital Outlay 29,225 82,969 30,000 (52,969)

Total Expenses 3,945,986 4,766,831 6,604,908 1,838,077

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 136,251 17,810 0 (17,810)

Beginning Fund Balance (40,696) 95,555 113,365 17,810

Ending Fund Balance $95,555 $113,365 $113,365 $0

City of San AngeloVehicle Maintenance Internal Service Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

305 REVENUES:

Radio 1,028,209 211,202 162,584 ($48,618)Voice Over IP 0 276,039 399,405 123,366Internet 0 69,684 60,022 (9,662)Cell Phones 0 175,092 203,310 28,218

Total Revenues $1,028,209 $732,017 $825,321 $93,304

305 EXPENSES:

Radio 186,198 211,202 223,226 $12,024Voice Over IP 242,702 186,039 267,745 81,706Internet 1,999 159,684 60,022Cell Phones 0 175,092 166,020 (9,072)

Total Expenses 430,899 732,017 717,013 (15,004)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 597,310 0 108,308 108,308

Beginning Fund Balance (586,145) 11,165 11,165 0

Ending Fund Balance $11,165 $11,165 $119,473 $108,308

City of San AngeloCommunications Internal Service FundSchedule of Revenues and Expenses

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

310 REVENUES: Clinic Revenue 140,608 132,400 132,084 ($316)Self Insurance Revenue 5,955,062 7,226,044 7,917,129 691,085Pharmacy Revenue 828,833 0 0 0Interest 3,548 4,000 0 (4,000)

Total Revenues $6,928,051 $7,362,444 $8,049,213 $686,769

310 EXPENSES:

Clinic Personnel 348,401 150,281 0 (150,281)Clinic Operation Expense 148,548 382,488 551,940 169,452Self Insurance Personnel 105,223 74,003 95,885 21,882Self Insurance Operation Exp. 5,644,153 6,755,672 7,399,096 643,424Pharmacy Personnel 70,607 0 0 0Pharmacy Operation Expense 510,696 0 0 0

Total Expenses $6,827,628 $7,362,444 $8,046,921 $684,477

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 100,423 0 2,292 2,292

Beginning Balance 220,638 321,061 321,061 0

Ending Balance $321,061 $321,061 $323,353 $2,292

City of San AngeloCity Health Internal Service Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expense

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

320 REVENUES: Premium Contributions 468,312 455,940 468,988 $13,048Special Event Insurance 31,744 35,000 35,000 0Insurance Proceeds 3,082 82,824 83,295 471Interest 12,252 12,746 9,768 (2,978)

Total Revenues $515,390 $586,510 $597,051 $10,541

320 EXPENSES:

Claims 628,495 425,661 401,301 ($24,360)Insurance Premiums 59,306 91,000 91,000 0Claims Management 44,133 68,595 99,750 31,155Capital 2,254 0 5,000 5,000

Total Expenses $734,188 $585,256 $597,051 $11,795

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures (218,798) 1,254 0 (1,254)

Beginning Fund Balance 2,099,355 1,880,557 1,881,811 1,254

Ending Fund Balance $1,880,557 $1,881,811 $1,881,811 $0

City of San AngeloProperty/Casualty Internal Service Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expense

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

330 REVENUES: Premium Contributions 981,109 976,380 929,666 ($46,714)Insurance Proceeds 0 34,000 50,000 16,000Interest 10,448 10,715 9,628 (1,087)Discounts 0 0 0 0

Total Revenues $991,557 $1,021,095 $989,294 ($31,801)

330 EXPENSES:

Personnel 287,217 290,497 293,355 $2,858Supplies and Maintenance 32,616 73,035 57,805 (15,230)Claims 399,047 263,631 268,908 5,277Insurance Premiums 52,194 54,315 54,315 0Capital 0 0 314,911 314,911

Total Expenses $771,074 $681,478 $989,294 $307,816

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 220,483 339,617 0 (339,617)

Beginning Balance 1,548,335 1,768,818 2,108,435 339,617

Ending Balance $1,768,818 $2,108,435 $2,108,435 $0

City of San AngeloWorkers' Compensation Internal Service Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expense

2011 Property Tax Rates in CITY OF SAN ANGELOThis notice concerns the 2011 property tax rates for CITY OF SAN ANGELO. It presents information about three tax rates. Last year's tax rate is the actual tax rate the taxing unit used to determine property taxes last year. This year's effective tax rate would impose the same total taxes as last year if you compare properties taxed in both years. This year's rollback tax rate is the highest tax rate the taxing unit can set before taxpayers start rollback procedures. In each case these rates are found by dividing the total amount of taxes by the tax base (the total value of taxable property) with adjustments as required by state law. The rates are given per $100 of property value.

Last year's tax rate:

Last year's operating taxes $25,442,428

Last year's debt taxes $2,759,857

Last year's total taxes $28,202,285

Last year's tax base $3,449,820,795

Last year's total tax rate $0.81750/$100

This year's effective tax rate:

Last year's adjusted taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property)

$27,825,787

÷ This year's adjusted tax base (after subtracting value of new property)

$2,765,360,753

=This year's effective tax rate $1.00622/$100

This year's rollback tax rate:

Last year's adjusted operating taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property and adjusting for any transferred function, tax increment financing, state criminal justice mandate, and/or enhanced indigent healthcare expenditures)

$25,076,300

÷ This year's adjusted tax base $2,765,360,753

=This year's effective operating rate $0.90680/$100

x 1.08=this year's maximum operating rate $0.97934/$100

+ This year's debt rate $0.07808/$100

= This year's total rollback rate $1.05742/$100

Statement of Increase/DecreaseIf CITY OF SAN ANGELO adopts a 2011 tax rate equal to the effective tax rate of $1.00622 per $100 of value, taxes would increase compared to 2010 taxes by $4,659,143.

Schedule A - Unencumbered Fund BalanceThe following estimated balances will be left in the unit's property tax accounts at the end of the fiscal year. These balances are not encumbered by a corresponding debt obligation. Type of Property Tax Fund Balance

Maintenance & Operating 4,566,864 Interest & Sinking 146,740

Schedule B - 2011 Debt ServiceThe unit plans to pay the following amounts for long-term debts that are secured by property taxes. These amounts will be paid from property tax revenues (or additional sales tax revenues, if applicable).

Description of DebtPrincipal or Contract Payment to be Paid from Property Taxes

Interest to be Paid from Property Taxes

Other Amounts to be Paid

Total Payment

2005 Tax/Rev C.O.

(19,750,000) Sales Tax 1,055,000 502,568 0 1,557,568

2006 Tax/Rev C.O.

(2,500,000) Landfill 275,000 66,256 0 341,256

2007 Tax/Rev C.O.

(6,970,000) 1,325,000 99,063 0 1,424,063

2008 Tax/Rev C.O.

(10,145,000) Sales Tax 100,000 448,325 0 548,325

2009 Tax/Rev C.O.

(14,600,000) 55,000 632,801 0 687,801

2009 Tax/Rev G.O.

Refunding (4,605,000) 825,000 82,338 0 907,338

2011A Tax/Rec C.O.

(13,780,000) 155,000 590,675 0 745,675

Total required for 2011 debt service $6,212,026

- Amount (if any) paid from Schedule A $0

- Amount (if any) paid from other resources $3,691,860

- Excess collections last year $20,934

= Total to be paid from taxes in 2011 $2,499,232

+ Amount added in anticipation that the unit will collect only 98.00% of its taxes in 2011

$51,005

= Total debt levy $2,550,237

This notice contains a summary of actual effective and rollback tax rates' calculations. You can inspect a copy of the full calculations at 2302 Pulliam St, San Angelo, TX 76905. Name of person preparing this notice: Bill Benson Title: Chief Appraiser Date Prepared: 07/27/2011

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30 2012; ADOPTING EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SCHEDULES; PROVIDING FOR THE GENERAL APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER APPROPRIATIONS BUDGETED; RATIFYING TRANSFERS OF APPROPRIATIONS OCCURRING IN THE 2010-2011 FISCAL YEAR AND AMENDING THAT BUDGET ORDINANCE ACCORDINGLY; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE POWER, ONLY AS PERMITTED BY LAW, TO AMEND OR MAKE CHANGES IN THE BUDGET FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES; PROVIDING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO MAKE CERTAIN ADJUSTMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME IN OR BETWEEN BUDGETED ALLOCATIONS; AND, PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE BUDGET.

WHEREAS, a budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012, has been proposed and submitted by the City Manager to the City Council as required by law; and, WHEREAS, the proposed budget has been filed with the City Clerk and has been posted on the website for the City of San Angelo, for inspection by any person for more than thirty (30) days immediately prior to the public hearing upon said budget; and, WHEREAS, proper notice of public hearing upon this budget has been posted and published in accordance with applicable law; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted the necessary public hearings as required by law; and, WHEREAS, after a full and final consideration of the financial condition and estimated revenues and proposed expenditures as set forth in the budget as filed and amended, it is the consensus of opinion that the budget as filed and amended should be approved. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, that:

SECTION 1 The facts and matters set forth in the preamble of this Ordinance are bound to be true and correct.

SECTION 2 The budget as filed with the City Clerk and as amended by the City

Council, for the fiscal year October 1, 2011, to September 30, 2012, (hereinafter the “Budget”) is hereby approved and adopted. A copy of the Budget, as amended, approved, and adopted, is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof for all purposes.

SECTION 3 The Competitive Pay Plan Grade and Step Tables for Fire and Police Civil Service employees and the Salary Ranges for all other City employees set forth in the Budget are attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and made a part hereof for all purposes. Employee compensation schedules that are in accordance with the Competitive Pay Plan and Grade Step Tables for Fire and Police Civil Service employees and the Salary Ranges for all other City employees as set forth are hereby authorized.

SECTION 4 By virtue of the adoption of the Budget, there are hereby appropriated out

of available cash funds and out of the general and special revenues of the City that will be received in the treasury during the course of the 2011-2012 fiscal year, the amounts set forth in the Budget for the purposes therein stated.

SECTION 5 The City Council reserves the authority to transfer appropriations budgeted

from one account or activity to another within the objects covered by the Budget. All transfers of appropriations budgeted from one account or activity to another within the objects of the budget for the fiscal year 2010-2011, are hereby ratified and the Budget Ordinance for fiscal year 2010-2011, heretofore enacted by the City Council, be, and the same is hereby, amended to the extent of such transfers for all purposes.

SECTION 6 The expenditures of the City shall be made in accordance with the

financial summaries included within the Budget approved by this ordinance provided however: 1. The City Council may, from time to time and as permitted by law, amend

this ordinance to authorize changes that increase the total appropriation of any fund or otherwise make changes in the budget for municipal purposes.

2. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve changes that

move budgeted amounts between accounts within a fund. 3. The City Manager is authorized to implement a “vacancy rate” which

allows him to freeze budgeted payroll sums associated with unfilled positions.

4. The City Manager is authorized to approve budget amendments that reduce

the total amount of budgeted revenues and expenditures in a fund. Under this authorization the reduction in budgeted expenses must equal or exceed any reduction in budgeted revenues.

SECTION 7 Certain grants are identified in the Budget, and where possible estimated

revenues and expenditures are included as listed on Exhibit “C”, attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to apply for those grants and execute any related documents.

SECTION 8 The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide a certified copy of this budget

ordinance and the Budget as amended, approved and adopted to the County Clerk of Tom Green County for recording after final passage hereof.

SECTION 9 Should any section, provision, clause, or word of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby.

INTRODUCED on the day of , 2011, and finally PASSED,

APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the day of , 2011.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: BY:

Alvin New, Mayor By: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form: Michael T. Dane, Finance Director Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Exhibit A (1 of 2)

City of San AngeloConsolidated Statement of Funds

Schedule of Revenues and ExpendituresFiscal Year Beginning October 1, 2011

Fund Beginning Operating Transfers Amount Operating Transfers Total Rev Over/ EndingNo. Fund Name Balance Revenues In Available Expenditures Out Expenditures (Under) Exp Balance

101 General $4,566,864 $55,466,577 $820,000 $60,853,441 $52,192,556 $4,094,021 $56,286,577 $0 $4,566,864105 General Debt Service 146,740 4,900,224 0 5,046,964 4,900,224 0 4,900,224 0 146,740501 Equipment Replacement 23,500 52,000 1,201,373 1,276,873 1,253,373 0 1,253,373 0 23,500502 Capital Projects 55,773 2,072 1,753,119 1,810,964 1,755,191 0 1,755,191 0 55,773103 Intergovernmental 320,431 2,153,343 373,715 2,847,489 2,527,058 0 2,527,058 0 320,431106 TIRZ 1,347 465,229 0 466,576 465,229 0 465,229 0 1,347453 Community Development Block Grant 0 850,827 0 850,827 850,827 0 850,827 0 0483 HOME Grant 0 468,019 0 468,019 468,019 0 468,019 0 0601 Designated Revenue (569) 5,600 0 5,031 5,600 0 5,600 0 (569)640 Lake Nasworthy Trust 10,250,010 637,000 0 10,887,010 50,000 78,400 128,400 508,600 10,758,610202 Golf Course (357,083) 0 75,000 (282,083) 75,000 0 75,000 0 (357,083)203 Texas Bank Sports Complex 91,450 263,000 277,651 632,101 540,651 0 540,651 0 91,450410 Civic Events (80,922) 1,841,400 0 1,760,478 1,841,400 0 1,841,400 0 (80,922)420 Fort Concho 42,542 529,750 301,431 873,723 831,181 0 831,181 0 42,542440 Fairmount Cemetery (191,241) 304,750 16,732 130,241 321,482 0 321,482 0 (191,241)201 State Office Building 75,277 1,189,800 0 1,265,077 1,106,214 0 1,106,214 83,586 158,863220 Airport Operating 407,409 1,380,503 0 1,787,912 1,380,503 0 1,380,503 0 407,409529 Airport PFC 574,314 203,481 0 777,795 0 0 0 203,481 777,795531 Airport Capital Projects 55,153 0 0 55,153 0 0 0 0 55,153230 Solid Waste Enterprise (2,442,233) 994,675 0 (1,447,558) 674,675 320,000 994,675 0 (2,442,233)240 Stormwater (147) 2,570,000 95,000 2,664,853 2,665,000 0 2,665,000 0 (147)260 Water Operating 1,473,921 23,359,296 208,290 25,041,507 18,181,586 5,386,000 23,567,586 0 1,473,921261 Water Debt Service 567,824 2,400 6,889,895 7,460,119 6,892,295 0 6,892,295 0 567,824510 Water Capital Projects 5,000 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 5,000512 Water / Supply Capital Projects 6,053 6,186,000 0 6,192,053 4,682,105 1,503,895 6,186,000 0 6,053270 Wastewater Operating 3,206,635 10,165,600 0 13,372,235 5,561,474 4,569,890 10,131,364 34,236 3,240,871271 Wastewater Debt Service 579,285 5,000 4,396,720 4,981,005 4,401,720 0 4,401,720 0 579,285520 Wastewater Capital Projects 1,025,216 1,706,000 0 2,731,216 1,249,280 456,720 1,706,000 0 1,025,216

Operating Totals $20,402,549 $115,702,546 $16,408,926 $152,514,021 $114,872,643 $16,408,926 $131,281,569 $829,903 $21,232,452

301 Vehicle Maintenance $113,365 $6,604,908 $0 $6,718,273 $6,604,908 $0 $6,604,908 $0 $113,365305 Communications 11,165 825,321 0 836,486 717,013 0 717,013 108,308 119,473310 City Health 321,061 8,049,213 0 8,370,274 8,046,921 0 8,046,921 2,292 323,353320 Property/Casualty 1,881,811 597,051 0 2,478,862 597,051 0 597,051 0 1,881,811330 Workers' Compensation 2,108,435 989,294 0 3,097,729 989,294 0 989,294 0 2,108,435

Total Internal Service Funds $4,435,837 $17,065,787 $0 $21,501,624 $16,955,187 $0 $16,955,187 $110,600 $4,546,437

Total Revenue $6,986,881

Operations & Maintenance 943,624

Ballot Projects 5,137,955

Future Incentives 905,302

Total Expenditures $6,986,881

Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures 0

Estimated Balance of Existing Economic Development Projects $2,910,059

Proposed2011-2012

CITY OF SAN ANGELO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES

FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011

Exhibit A (2 of 2)

Grade Min Mid Max

47 $120,536 $150,670 $180,80443 $99,165 $123,957 $148,74742 $94,443 $118,054 $141,66538 $77,699 $97,123 $116,54837 $73,999 $92,499 $110,99835 $67,119 $83,898 $100,67834 $63,923 $79,903 $95,88433 $60,879 $76,099 $91,31932 $57,980 $72,475 $86,96930 $52,589 $65,736 $78,88429 $50,085 $62,606 $75,12828 $49,131 $61,414 $73,69727 $45,428 $56,786 $68,14326 $44,563 $55,703 $66,84525 $42,441 $53,052 $63,66224 $40,420 $50,526 $60,63023 $38,496 $48,120 $57,74422 $36,663 $45,828 $54,99321 $33,899 $42,375 $50,84920 $32,285 $40,357 $48,42819 $31,670 $39,588 $47,50618 $29,283 $36,605 $43,92617 $27,889 $34,862 $41,83416 $26,561 $33,201 $39,84215 $26,056 $32,570 $39,08314 $24,815 $31,018 $37,22213 $23,633 $29,541 $35,45012 $22,508 $28,134 $33,76111 $21,435 $26,794 $32,15510 $19,821 $24,776 $29,7319 $19,443 $24,304 $29,1648 $18,517 $23,146 $27,7757 $17,635 $22,044 $26,4526 $16,796 $20,994 $25,1945 $15,996 $19,994 $23,9933 $14,509 $18,135 $21,763

Grade Min Mid Max

GR 30M $59,413 $63,173 $66,933GR 29M $51,969 $55,261 $58,553

GR 27M, GR 27A $35,871 $43,878 $51,885

Non-Civil Service Public Safety

City of San AngeloSalary Ranges

Effective 10-1-11

Exhibit B (1 of 2)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13GR 23 Recruit $34,466GR 26 Probationary PO $36,444GR 27 Police Officer $40,005 $40,577 $41,157 $41,745 $42,341 $42,946 $43,560 $44,182 $44,814 $45,454 $46,103 $46,762 $47,430GR 29 Sergeant $53,155 $53,959 $54,776 $55,604 $56,446 $57,300 $58,167 $59,047 $59,940GR 30 Lieutenant $61,139 $62,064 $63,004 $63,957 $64,925 $65,907 $66,904 $67,917 $68,944

14 15 16 17 18 19GR 27 Police Officer $48,108 $48,796 $49,493 $50,200 $50,917 $51,645

Effective 10/1/2011

City of San AngeloCivil Service Grade and Step Plan

Police Department

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11GR 24 Recruit $34,003GR 26 Probationary FF $34,907GR 27 FF II $36,013 $36,559 $37,092 $37,652 $38,185 $38,760 $39,320 $39,909 $40,525 $41,113GR 28 Driver $44,759 $45,446 $46,103 $46,790 $47,491 $48,191 $48,892 $49,636 $50,380 $51,123GR 29 Lieutenant $54,079 $54,889 $55,712 $56,546 $57,386 $58,236 $59,113 $59,990 $60,895 $61,812GR 30 Captain $61,907 $62,839 $63,769 $64,728 $65,700 $66,685 $67,683 $68,696GR 31 Battalion Chief $69,640 $70,679 $71,732 $72,798 $73,878 $74,998GR 32 Asst Chief $78,750 $79,924 $81,139 $82,353 $83,582 $84,837

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

GR 27 FF II $41,730 $42,346 $42,964 $43,608 $44,253 $44,896 $45,569 $46,257 $46,928 $47,629 $48,344GR 28 Driver $51,866 $52,653 $53,437

Effective 10/1/2011

City of San AngeloCivil Service Grade and Step Plan

Fire Department

Exhibit B (2 of 2)

City of San Angelo Budget Ordinance Exhibit C City Council authorized application for the following grants: Atmos Energy Grant Bureau of Justice Assistance Edward Byrne Memorial Local Justice Assistance Grant Community Development Block Grant Emergency Food and Shelter Program Grant Emergency Management Performance Grant Environmental Health Service and Bureau of Regional Local Health Operations Grant Federal Aviation Administration Grants - Entitlements and Discretionary HOME Grant Office of Justice Programs Bulletproof Vest Partnership Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant San Angelo Cultural Affairs Council Grant Senior Nutrition Grant Texas Department of Transportation Routine Airport Maintenance Program Texas Department of Transportation Click It or Ticket Grant Transit and Transportation Planning Grants - Federal and State Women, Infant, and Children Grant

Exhibit C

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30 2012; ADOPTING EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SCHEDULES; PROVIDING FOR THE GENERAL APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER APPROPRIATIONS BUDGETED; RATIFYING TRANSFERS OF APPROPRIATIONS OCCURRING IN THE 2010-2011 FISCAL YEAR AND AMENDING THAT BUDGET ORDINANCE ACCORDINGLY; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE POWER, ONLY AS PERMITTED BY LAW, TO AMEND OR MAKE CHANGES IN THE BUDGET FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES; PROVIDING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO MAKE CERTAIN ADJUSTMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME IN OR BETWEEN BUDGETED ALLOCATIONS; AND, PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE BUDGET.

WHEREAS, a budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012, has been proposed and submitted by the City Manager to the City Council as required by law; and, WHEREAS, the proposed budget has been filed with the City Clerk and has been posted on the website for the City of San Angelo, for inspection by any person for more than thirty (30) days immediately prior to the public hearing upon said budget; and, WHEREAS, proper notice of public hearing upon this budget has been posted and published in accordance with applicable law; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted the necessary public hearings as required by law; and, WHEREAS, after a full and final consideration of the financial condition and estimated revenues and proposed expenditures as set forth in the budget as filed and amended, it is the consensus of opinion that the budget as filed and amended should be approved. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, that:

SECTION 1 The facts and matters set forth in the preamble of this Ordinance are bound to be true and correct.

SECTION 2 The budget as filed with the City Clerk and as amended by the City

Council, for the fiscal year October 1, 2011, to September 30, 2012, (hereinafter the “Budget”) is hereby approved and adopted. A copy of the Budget, as amended, approved, and adopted, is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof for all purposes.

SECTION 3 The Competitive Pay Plan Grade and Step Tables for Fire and Police Civil Service employees and the Salary Ranges for all other City employees set forth in the Budget are attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and made a part hereof for all purposes. Employee compensation schedules that are in accordance with the Competitive Pay Plan and Grade Step Tables for Fire and Police Civil Service employees and the Salary Ranges for all other City employees as set forth are hereby authorized.

SECTION 4 By virtue of the adoption of the Budget, there are hereby appropriated out

of available cash funds and out of the general and special revenues of the City that will be received in the treasury during the course of the 2011-2012 fiscal year, the amounts set forth in the Budget for the purposes therein stated.

SECTION 5 The City Council reserves the authority to transfer appropriations budgeted

from one account or activity to another within the objects covered by the Budget. All transfers of appropriations budgeted from one account or activity to another within the objects of the budget for the fiscal year 2010-2011, are hereby ratified and the Budget Ordinance for fiscal year 2010-2011, heretofore enacted by the City Council, be, and the same is hereby, amended to the extent of such transfers for all purposes.

SECTION 6 The expenditures of the City shall be made in accordance with the

financial summaries included within the Budget approved by this ordinance provided however: 1. The City Council may, from time to time and as permitted by law, amend

this ordinance to authorize changes that increase the total appropriation of any fund or otherwise make changes in the budget for municipal purposes.

2. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve changes that

move budgeted amounts between accounts within a fund. 3. The City Manager is authorized to implement a “vacancy rate” which

allows him to freeze budgeted payroll sums associated with unfilled positions.

4. The City Manager is authorized to approve budget amendments that reduce

the total amount of budgeted revenues and expenditures in a fund. Under this authorization the reduction in budgeted expenses must equal or exceed any reduction in budgeted revenues.

SECTION 7 Certain grants are identified in the Budget, and where possible estimated

revenues and expenditures are included as listed on Exhibit “C”, attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to apply for those grants and execute any related documents.

SECTION 8 The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide a certified copy of this budget

ordinance and the Budget as amended, approved and adopted to the County Clerk of Tom Green County for recording after final passage hereof.

SECTION 9 Should any section, provision, clause, or word of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby.

INTRODUCED on the day of , 2011, and finally PASSED,

APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the day of , 2011.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: BY:

Alvin New, Mayor By: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form: Michael T. Dane, Finance Director Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Exhibit A (1 of 2)

City of San AngeloConsolidated Statement of Funds

Schedule of Revenues and ExpendituresFiscal Year Beginning October 1, 2011

Fund Beginning Operating Transfers Amount Operating Transfers Total Rev Over/ EndingNo. Fund Name Balance Revenues In Available Expenditures Out Expenditures (Under) Exp Balance

101 General $4,566,864 $55,466,577 $820,000 $60,853,441 $52,274,327 $4,012,250 $56,286,577 $0 $4,566,864105 General Debt Service 146,740 2,794,330 2,105,894 5,046,964 4,900,224 0 4,900,224 0 146,740501 Equipment Replacement 23,500 52,000 1,201,373 1,276,873 1,253,373 0 1,253,373 0 23,500502 Capital Projects 55,773 2,072 1,670,954 1,728,799 1,673,026 0 1,673,026 0 55,773103 Intergovernmental 320,431 2,153,343 373,715 2,847,489 2,527,058 0 2,527,058 0 320,431106 TIRZ (797,357) 465,229 0 (332,128) 465,229 0 465,229 0 (797,357)453 Community Development Block Grant 0 850,827 0 850,827 850,827 0 850,827 0 0483 HOME Grant 0 468,019 0 468,019 468,019 0 468,019 0 0601 Designated Revenue (569) 5,600 0 5,031 5,600 0 5,600 0 (569)640 Lake Nasworthy Trust 10,250,010 637,000 0 10,887,010 50,000 76,500 126,500 510,500 10,760,510202 Golf Course (357,083) 0 75,000 (282,083) 75,000 0 75,000 0 (357,083)203 Texas Bank Sports Complex 91,450 113,000 427,651 632,101 540,651 0 540,651 0 91,450410 Civic Events (80,922) 1,841,400 0 1,760,478 1,841,400 0 1,841,400 0 (80,922)420 Fort Concho 42,542 529,750 301,431 873,723 831,181 0 831,181 0 42,542440 Fairmount Cemetery (191,241) 304,750 16,732 130,241 321,482 0 321,482 0 (191,241)201 State Office Building 75,277 1,189,800 0 1,265,077 1,106,214 0 1,106,214 83,586 158,863220 Airport Operating 407,409 1,380,503 0 1,787,912 1,380,503 0 1,380,503 0 407,409529 Airport PFC 574,314 203,481 0 777,795 0 203,481 203,481 0 574,314531 Airport Capital Projects 55,153 0 0 55,153 0 0 0 0 55,153230 Solid Waste Enterprise (2,442,233) 994,675 0 (1,447,558) 674,675 320,000 994,675 0 (2,442,233)240 Stormwater (147) 2,570,000 95,000 2,664,853 2,665,000 0 2,665,000 0 (147)260 Water Operating 1,473,921 23,359,296 208,290 25,041,507 23,567,586 0 23,567,586 0 1,473,921261 Water Debt Service 567,824 2,400 6,889,895 7,460,119 6,892,295 0 6,892,295 0 567,824510 Water Capital Projects 5,000 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 5,000512 Water / Supply Capital Projects 6,053 6,186,000 0 6,192,053 4,682,105 1,503,895 6,186,000 0 6,053270 Wastewater Operating 3,206,635 10,165,600 0 13,372,235 4,980,538 5,150,826 10,131,364 34,236 3,240,871271 Wastewater Debt Service 579,285 5,000 4,412,220 4,996,505 4,417,220 0 4,417,220 0 579,285520 Wastewater Capital Projects 1,025,216 1,706,000 0 2,731,216 1,249,280 456,720 1,706,000 0 1,025,216

Operating Totals $19,603,845 $113,446,652 $18,598,155 $151,648,652 $119,692,813 $11,723,672 $131,416,485 $628,322 $20,232,167

301 Vehicle Maintenance $113,365 $6,604,908 $0 $6,718,273 $6,604,908 $0 $6,604,908 $0 $113,365305 Communications 11,165 825,321 0 836,486 717,013 0 717,013 108,308 119,473310 City Health 321,061 8,049,213 0 8,370,274 8,046,921 0 8,046,921 2,292 323,353320 Property/Casualty 1,881,811 597,051 0 2,478,862 597,051 0 597,051 0 1,881,811330 Workers' Compensation 2,108,435 989,294 0 3,097,729 989,294 0 989,294 0 2,108,435

Total Internal Service Funds $4,435,837 $17,065,787 $0 $21,501,624 $16,955,187 $0 $16,955,187 $110,600 $4,546,437

Exhibit A (2 of 2)

Description ExplanationProposed2011-2012

Sale of CVCED 2006 Appraisal of $270,000 plus $20,000 improvements $290,000Income-Sales & Use Tax Sales Tax Receipts based on Finance Dept Estimate 6,664,251Interest on Investments Interest based on 5/31/11 Receipts 14,150Lease Income L-3 & CVCED 18,480

Total Revenue $6,986,881

Total Administration 41,203Dues and Subscriptions Memberships 1,985

Bank Charges First Financial Bank Service Charges, Fees Etc, 120Economic Development Investment Program Affiliations 81,353City Services ED Staff/Finance/Legal/City Clerk 315,162Industrial Park Ops & Maint 11,288Debt Service Principal & Interest 4,349,569Debt Service Reserve Contribution Reserve for adverse sales tax receipts 200,000Contract Services Contract services-outside legal 5,000Marketing/Advertising - Chamber Chamber Economic Development Contract 225,000Annual Report Design and printing of annual report 10,000Promotion/Awareness Building Business Retention & Expansion Program marketing materials 5,000Software Expense Newsletter & Website 3,280Project-Affordable Housing Pay-As-You-Go 335,000Project-Sports Facility Maint Pay-As-You-Go with Annually COL Adjustment of 2% 253,386Texas Bank Sports Complex Annual Appropriation 150,000Downtown San Angelo Downtown economic development services contract 75,000Annual CVCED Contract D&O Insurance, annual audit 5,000CVCED Expenses Costs associated with current CVCED building and function 14,233Economic Development Projects Incentives 905,302

Total Expenditures $6,986,881

Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures $0

Estimated Balance of Existing Economic Development Projects $2,910,059

CITY OF SAN ANGELO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES

FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011

Grade Min Mid Max

47 $120,536 $150,670 $180,80443 $99,165 $123,957 $148,74742 $94,443 $118,054 $141,66538 $77,699 $97,123 $116,54837 $73,999 $92,499 $110,99835 $67,119 $83,898 $100,67834 $63,923 $79,903 $95,88433 $60,879 $76,099 $91,31932 $57,980 $72,475 $86,96930 $52,589 $65,736 $78,88429 $50,085 $62,606 $75,12828 $49,131 $61,414 $73,69727 $45,428 $56,786 $68,14326 $44,563 $55,703 $66,84525 $42,441 $53,052 $63,66224 $40,420 $50,526 $60,63023 $38,496 $48,120 $57,74422 $36,663 $45,828 $54,99321 $33,899 $42,375 $50,84920 $32,285 $40,357 $48,42819 $31,670 $39,588 $47,50618 $29,283 $36,605 $43,92617 $27,889 $34,862 $41,83416 $26,561 $33,201 $39,84215 $26,056 $32,570 $39,08314 $24,815 $31,018 $37,22213 $23,633 $29,541 $35,45012 $22,508 $28,134 $33,76111 $21,435 $26,794 $32,15510 $19,821 $24,776 $29,7319 $19,443 $24,304 $29,1648 $18,517 $23,146 $27,7757 $17,635 $22,044 $26,4526 $16,796 $20,994 $25,1945 $15,996 $19,994 $23,9933 $14,509 $18,135 $21,763

Grade Min Mid Max

GR 30M $59,413 $63,173 $66,933GR 29M $51,969 $55,261 $58,553

GR 27M, GR 27A $35,871 $43,878 $51,885

Non-Civil Service Public Safety

City of San AngeloSalary Ranges

Effective 10-1-11

Exhibit B (1 of 2)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13GR 23 Recruit $34,466GR 26 Probationary PO $36,444GR 27 Police Officer $40,005 $40,577 $41,157 $41,745 $42,341 $42,946 $43,560 $44,182 $44,814 $45,454 $46,103 $46,762 $47,430GR 29 Sergeant $53,155 $53,959 $54,776 $55,604 $56,446 $57,300 $58,167 $59,047 $59,940GR 30 Lieutenant $61,139 $62,064 $63,004 $63,957 $64,925 $65,907 $66,904 $67,917 $68,944

14 15 16 17 18 19GR 27 Police Officer $48,108 $48,796 $49,493 $50,200 $50,917 $51,645

Effective 10/1/2011

City of San AngeloCivil Service Grade and Step Plan

Police Department

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11GR 24 Recruit $34,003GR 26 Probationary FF $34,907GR 27 FF II $36,013 $36,559 $37,092 $37,652 $38,185 $38,760 $39,320 $39,909 $40,525 $41,113GR 28 Driver $44,759 $45,446 $46,103 $46,790 $47,491 $48,191 $48,892 $49,636 $50,380 $51,123GR 29 Lieutenant $54,079 $54,889 $55,712 $56,546 $57,386 $58,236 $59,113 $59,990 $60,895 $61,812GR 30 Captain $61,907 $62,839 $63,769 $64,728 $65,700 $66,685 $67,683 $68,696GR 31 Battalion Chief $69,640 $70,679 $71,732 $72,798 $73,878 $74,998GR 32 Asst Chief $78,750 $79,924 $81,139 $82,353 $83,582 $84,837

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

GR 27 FF II $41,730 $42,346 $42,964 $43,608 $44,253 $44,896 $45,569 $46,257 $46,928 $47,629 $48,344GR 28 Driver $51,866 $52,653 $53,437

Effective 10/1/2011

City of San AngeloCivil Service Grade and Step Plan

Fire Department

Exhibit B (2 of 2)

City of San Angelo Budget Ordinance Exhibit C City Council authorized application for the following grants: Atmos Energy Grant Bureau of Justice Assistance Edward Byrne Memorial Local Justice Assistance Grant Community Development Block Grant Emergency Food and Shelter Program Grant Emergency Management Performance Grant Environmental Health Service and Bureau of Regional Local Health Operations Grant Federal Aviation Administration Grants - Entitlements and Discretionary HOME Grant Office of Justice Programs Bulletproof Vest Partnership Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant San Angelo Cultural Affairs Council Grant Senior Nutrition Grant Texas Department of Transportation Routine Airport Maintenance Program Texas Department of Transportation Click It or Ticket Grant Transit and Transportation Planning Grants - Federal and State Women, Infant, and Children Grant

Exhibit C

CITY OF SAN ANGELO

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

This budget will raise less total property taxes than last year’s

budget by $163,572 (-0.60%), and of that amount $530,877* is tax

revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this

year.

*Note that $694,449 is a tax revenue decrease due to a reduction in the ad valorem property tax rate.

Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, will hold two public

hearings on the proposed City Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending

September 30, 2012. The hearings will take place during regularly scheduled City Council sessions

which will begin at 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, August 30, 2011, and September 6, 2011, at the McNease

Convention Center, South Meeting Room, 500 Rio Concho Drive.

The complete proposed budget may be examined on weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in

the office of the City Clerk on the first floor of the Municipal Center, 106 S. Chadbourne.

City of San Angelo

106 S. Chadbourne

San Angelo, Texas 76903

Attention: Don Maynard, Budget Manager

2011 Property Tax Rates in CITY OF SAN ANGELOThis notice concerns the 2011 property tax rates for CITY OF SAN ANGELO. It presents information about three tax rates. Last year's tax rate is the actual tax rate the taxing unit used to determine property taxes last year. This year's effective tax rate would impose the same total taxes as last year if you compare properties taxed in both years. This year's rollback tax rate is the highest tax rate the taxing unit can set before taxpayers start rollback procedures. In each case these rates are found by dividing the total amount of taxes by the tax base (the total value of taxable property) with adjustments as required by state law. The rates are given per $100 of property value.

Last year's tax rate:

Last year's operating taxes $25,442,428

Last year's debt taxes $2,759,857

Last year's total taxes $28,202,285

Last year's tax base $3,449,820,795

Last year's total tax rate $0.81750/$100

This year's effective tax rate:

Last year's adjusted taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property)

$27,825,787

÷ This year's adjusted tax base (after subtracting value of new property)

$2,765,360,753

=This year's effective tax rate $1.00622/$100

This year's rollback tax rate:

Last year's adjusted operating taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property and adjusting for any transferred function, tax increment financing, state criminal justice mandate, and/or enhanced indigent healthcare expenditures)

$25,076,300

÷ This year's adjusted tax base $2,765,360,753

=This year's effective operating rate $0.90680/$100

x 1.08=this year's maximum operating rate $0.97934/$100

+ This year's debt rate $0.07808/$100

= This year's total rollback rate $1.05742/$100

Statement of Increase/DecreaseIf CITY OF SAN ANGELO adopts a 2011 tax rate equal to the effective tax rate of $1.00622 per $100 of value, taxes would increase compared to 2010 taxes by $4,659,143.

Schedule A - Unencumbered Fund BalanceThe following estimated balances will be left in the unit's property tax accounts at the end of the fiscal year. These balances are not encumbered by a corresponding debt obligation. Type of Property Tax Fund Balance

Maintenance & Operating 4,566,864 Interest & Sinking 146,740

Schedule B - 2011 Debt ServiceThe unit plans to pay the following amounts for long-term debts that are secured by property taxes. These amounts will be paid from property tax revenues (or additional sales tax revenues, if applicable).

Description of DebtPrincipal or Contract Payment to be Paid from Property Taxes

Interest to be Paid from Property Taxes

Other Amounts to be Paid

Total Payment

2005 Tax/Rev C.O.

(19,750,000) Sales Tax 1,055,000 502,568 0 1,557,568

2006 Tax/Rev C.O.

(2,500,000) Landfill 275,000 66,256 0 341,256

2007 Tax/Rev C.O.

(6,970,000) 1,325,000 99,063 0 1,424,063

2008 Tax/Rev C.O.

(10,145,000) Sales Tax 100,000 448,325 0 548,325

2009 Tax/Rev C.O.

(14,600,000) 55,000 632,801 0 687,801

2009 Tax/Rev G.O.

Refunding (4,605,000) 825,000 82,338 0 907,338

2011A Tax/Rec C.O.

(13,780,000) 155,000 590,675 0 745,675

Total required for 2011 debt service $6,212,026

- Amount (if any) paid from Schedule A $0

- Amount (if any) paid from other resources $3,691,860

- Excess collections last year $20,934

= Total to be paid from taxes in 2011 $2,499,232

+ Amount added in anticipation that the unit will collect only 98.00% of its taxes in 2011

$51,005

= Total debt levy $2,550,237

This notice contains a summary of actual effective and rollback tax rates' calculations. You can inspect a copy of the full calculations at 2302 Pulliam St, San Angelo, TX 76905. Name of person preparing this notice: Bill Benson Title: Chief Appraiser Date Prepared: 07/27/2011

l Page 1

City of San Angelo Finance Department

Memo Date: August 23, 2011

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Don Maynard, Budget Manager

Subject: Agenda Item for September 6, 2011 Council Meeting

Contact: Don Maynard, Budget Manager, 481-2757

Caption: Regular Item

FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE LEVYING PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO FOR THE 2011 TAX YEAR:

AN ORDINANCE LEVYING TAXES AND PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION THEREOF AND PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS, IN AND FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, FOR THE 2011-2012 BUDGET YEAR

Summary: The proposed property tax rate will decrease from the prior year’s tax rate. The projected tax revenue will be less than the revenue received in the prior year by $163,572. Upon each one hundred dollar ($100) valuation of property subject to taxation in the City of San Angelo for the 2011-2012 fiscal year, the property tax will be applied as follows:

(a) To pay annual interest and maturities and create a sinking fund to discharge outstanding bonded indebtedness of the City of San Angelo $0.08000

(b) For the purposes of maintenance and operations in the General Fund $0.70600

The total tax rate for the aforementioned purposes is: $0.78600 History: On August 2, 2011, City Council took a Record Vote to propose a tax levy of $0.7975/$100 valuation of property. Financial Impact: The tax rate as proposed above will generate the following revenues: Interest & Sink portion: $ 2,774,724 Maintenance & Operations portion: $24,486,941 Total: $27,261,665 Related Vision Item (if applicable): Financial Vision. Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends introduction of the ordinance. Attachments: Tax Levy Ordinance

l Page 2

Presentation: No Publication: August 2, 2011 – Notice of Effective Tax Rate Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, Finance

AN ORDINANCE FIXING AND LEVYING AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE USE AND SUPPORT OF THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, FOR THE 2011-2012 BUDGET YEAR; PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION THEREOF; PROVIDING WHEN THE TAX SHALL BECOME DUE; PROVIDING WHEN THE TAX SHALL BECOME DELINQUENT; PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION ON THE CITY OPERATED WEB SITE; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the City Charter for the City of San Angelo provides that the City Council at its first meeting in September of each year, or as soon thereafter as practicable, shall levy the annual tax for such year; and, WHEREAS, Section 26.05 of the Texas Tax Code requires that the City of San Angelo, Texas, adopt a tax rate for the next fiscal year by September 30, 2011; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that all public notices have been given and published as required by law for fixing and levying the ad valorem taxes; and, WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the taxes for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012, hereinafter levied therefore are necessary to pay interest and maturities and create a sinking fund to discharge outstanding bonded indebtedness of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the tax for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012, hereinafter levied for purposes of maintenance and operations must be levied to provide for the revenue requirements of the budget for the ensuing fiscal year:

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT: Section One: The following taxes be and are hereby levied for the fiscal year 2011-2012, upon each One Hundred Dollar ($100) valuation of property subject to taxation in the City of San Angelo for said year:

To pay annual interest and maturities and create a sinking fund to discharge outstanding bonded indebtedness of the City of San Angelo $0.08000

For the purposes of maintenance and operations in the General Fund $0.70600

The total tax rate for the aforementioned purposes is: $0.78600

THIS TAX RATE WILL RAISE LESS TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS THAN LAST YEAR’S TAX RATE

Section Two: The taxes levied herein shall be assessed and proper record made thereof, as required by law by the officers performing the duties of assessor and collector of taxes for the City of San Angelo and their successors in office and said officers shall collect such taxes and remit the same required by law and this ordinance. Section Three: All taxes levied and due under this ordinance, plus penalties and interest thereon, shall become a lien upon the property against which the tax is assessed, as provided by City Charter and State law, and the officers performing the duties of assessor and collector of taxes for the City of San Angelo and their successors in office, or their designee, are hereby authorized and empowered to enforce the collection of such taxes, penalties and interest according to the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas and the Charter and Ordinances of the City of San Angelo. Penalties and interest collected shall be paid to and credited to the General Fund of the City of San Angelo. Section Four: Taxes levied under this ordinance shall be due on October 1, 2011, and if not paid as provided by law, shall immediately become delinquent on February 1, 2012. Section Five: The City hereby affirms the adoption of the following exemptions from taxation of real property:

An individual may claim an exemption from taxation equal to twenty percent (20%) of the appraised value of his/her residence homestead, but not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) or the value of the homestead if said value is less than $5,000.

Section Six: Should any part, portion, or section of this ordinance be declared invalid, inoperative, or void for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision, opinion or judgment shall in no way affect the remaining parts, portions or sections of this ordinance, which provisions shall be, remain and continue in full force and effect. Section Seven: The City Manager or his designee shall cause a copy of this Ordinance, in its entirety, as passed, to be published on the web site operated by the City of San Angelo Section Eight: This ordinance shall become effective on the date Approved and Adopted.

INTRODUCED on the 6th day of September, 2011, and APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the 20th day of September, 2011.

YES NO CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS Alvin New, Mayor Paul Alexander, SMD #1

Dwain Morrison, SMD #2 Johnny Silvas, SMD #3 Fredd B. Adams II, SMD #4 Kendall Hirschfeld, SMD #5 Charlotte Farmer, SMD #6 ATTEST: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved as to Content Approved as to Form Michael T. Dane, Finance Director Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date: August 30, 2011

To: Mayor and City Council members

From: Kari LeBoeuf, Planner

Subject: Z 11-09, a proposal to change the zoning from RS-1 (Single-Family Residence) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) on the following property:

Location: 6002 Knickerbocker Road, located on the northeast corner of

Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, specifically Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy subdivision, Group 2 in southwest San Angelo.

Contacts: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager 325-657-4210 Caption: Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s

denial of proposed zone change, and, possible first public hearing and consideration of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-09: City of San Angelo

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot located on the northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, specifically Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy Subdivision, changing the zoning

classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary: The subject property is a City-owned property and, because the owner must initiate a zone change, this falls to the Council speaking for the City. On June 28, 2011, City Council instructed the planning staff to begin the zone change process. Thus, we initiated the request at their direction. As the Planning Commission voted to deny the zone change, an approval of this zone change by Council must be made by a three-fourths (3/4) majority vote as stated in Zoning Ordinance Section 212(E)(4). In considering this application, the City Council may:

(1) approve the proposed zone change;

(2) modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be

more appropriate; or

(3) deny the proposed zone change. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:

North CG undeveloped field East CN self-service storage South RS-1 single-family residences West RS-1 single-family residences

Background:

In June 2011, a representative from Glen Meadows Baptist Church approached the planning staff about selling the church to a performance arts troupe. With the current zoning classification of RS-1, entertainment-oriented businesses, which are classified under the umbrella of “retail sales and service”, are not allowed. Any development in Neighborhood Commercial districts should be low-intensity with small floor areas and limited traffic generation, and the character of development should be compatible with the surrounding residential

neighborhood. Also, Neighborhood Commercial districts should ideally be clustered around intersections of major thoroughfares.

The ordinance goes on to regulate the maximum size allowed to insure that businesses in these areas are not comparable in size to big box retailers and the like, by placing a cap on the floor area ratio within this district to 60% of the size of the tract. For example, a lot of 10,000 square feet in a General Commercial district would allow a building size up to 20,000 square feet; in contrast, this same lot in a Neighborhood Commercial district would only allow a maximum building size of 6,000 square feet, or roughly one-third the size. This regulation protects the surrounding neighborhood from massive commercial enterprises being placed immediately adjacent to them.

Another important distinction of the Neighborhood Commercial district includes a maximum height, not a feature of all commercial districts, and the most restrictive level of outside storage, called “outside display”. This storage designation limits displays outdoors to no more than 5 feet from the wall.

Analysis: The subject property, as mentioned above, is located at the intersection of two streets. Knickerbocker Road is classified as an arterial street, intended to provide high-speed traffic movement and act as the backbone of a street network, carrying cars from centers of activity to the rest of the community. American Legion Road is classified as a collector street. Collectors are intended to provide access to neighborhoods and move traffic to arterial streets or freeways; they essentially act as ‘feeder’ streets. Both the 2003 and 2009 versions of the San Angelo Comprehensive Plan encourage clustering of commercial at intersections. The presence of nearby residential areas to the east and commercial to the west of the subject property indicates the appropriateness of Neighborhood Commercial in this area. The intensity of CN-allowed uses would have little, if any, adverse impact on the neighborhood, especially since the infrastructure to contain traffic is immediately adjacent; thus, traffic does not have to wind through residential streets to access the site. Additionally, the subject property already contains a substantial parking area such that commercial parking would not invade the neighboring residential areas. Any other commercial zoning classification would likely be too intensive for the area. In addition, the use of Neighborhood Commercial zoning here would function just as it is intended to; to buffer a residential area from a nearby high-speed thoroughfare. Also, such a change is consistent with the “neighborhood” classification called for in the Vision Plan map component of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission voted to deny the request. Bill Lawrence made the motion to deny the request as presented, which Sam Tambunga seconded. The

motion passed, 3-2, with David Eaton and Bill Wynne voting in opposition of the motion. Planning staff received twelve (12) written letters of opposition to this zone change request. The letters of opposition from within the 200’ notification area constitutes a total land area of approximately 14%.

Recommendation:

Planning Commission recommends denying this zone change request. City staff recommends approving this zone change request as presented.

Notification: Seventeen (17) owners of nearby property were formally notified of this application for zone change.

Related Vision Item: City Council Commerce Vision Revitalize older commercial areas; Compatibility of adjoining commercial and

neighborhood districts

Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property of proposed zone change;

aerial photo of same vicinity (as above-mentioned

map) highlighting subject property of proposed zone change; and

excerpt from zoning map, highlighting properties within

200’ notification area in opposition of proposed zone change;

draft ordinance.

Presentation: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot at northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, specifically Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy Subdivision, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: Z 11-09: City of San Angelo

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing

body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy Subdivision, northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, in southwest San Angelo shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District. The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment: SEVERABILITY:

The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY:

Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.

INTRODUCED on the 30th day of August, 2011 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 6th day of September, 2011. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

by:_______________________________

Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: by:_________________________________

Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

City of San Angelo

Memo

Meeting Date: September 6, 2011

To: Mayor and City Council members

From: Jesus Vazquez, Planner

Subject: Z 11-11 - City of San Angelo, otherwise known as PD 11-01, a request for approval of a zone change from Neighborhood Commercial (CN) district zone to Planned Development (PD) district zone, on the following property:

Location: 1730 North Main Street, an approximately 2.6 acre tract of property

formed by segments of surveys, bordered by North Emerick Street on the west, East 18th Street on the north, North Main Street on the east, and East 14th Street on the south, in north central San Angelo.

Purpose: Approving the zone change to Planned Development (PD) to allow

office use, industrial service use, and warehouse and freight movement.

Contacts: Shelley Burnett, ATMOS Energy (325) 245-5862

AJ Fawver, Planning Manager (325) 657-4210

Caption: Public Hearing and consideration of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-11: ATMOS Energy

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1730 North Main Street, an approximately 2.6 acre tract of property

formed by segments of surveys, bordered by North Emerick Street on the west, East 18th Street on the north, North Main Street on the east, and East 14th Street on the south, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to Planned Development (PD) District for a combination of office, aggregate and materials storage, accessory parking, and contractor usage; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary: The City Council may:

(1) recommend approving the proposed zone change;

(2) modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be more appropriate; or

(3) recommend denying the proposed zone change.

Recommendation: City staff recommends approving, subject to conditions as listed below for the proposed zone change. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to approve this request on August 15, 2011.

History and Background:

General Information

Existing Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial (CN) Existing Land Use: The subject property is currently used as office

use, industrial service use, and warehouse and freight movement. However, under the classifications above the subject property is limited in outdoor storage and cannot continue these combined uses under CN zoning. Therefore, the proponent is requesting a zone change to PD zoning to allow the above uses on the subject property.

Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: CN, CG, CO, RS-1 Single Family Housing West: CN Single Family & Commercial (Bruton

Trailers on 19th St and N. Main.) South: CG/CH Single Family Housing East: CN Single Family Housing & Vacant Lot

Thoroughfares/Streets: On the north and east sides, East 18th Street and North Emerick Street, of the subject property the existing streets are “major collector”. On the south end, East 14th Street, of the subject property the street is “minor collector”. The west side, North Main Street, of the subject property is a “major arterial”.

Zoning History: The subject property holds a Special Permit, SP

28, which allows the westernmost lot of the subject property to have a service building and warehouse.

Applicable Regulations: All CN regulations apply, with the exemption for the westernmost lot of the subject property, which may have a service building and warehouse.

Development Standards: If the PD is granted there are conditions

recommended below Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood Center Related Comp Plan Excerpts: “Neighborhood centers should individually have a

primary use, but should allow for a mix of uses allowing for increased activity, interest, and long-term viability (Page 38 of 2009 Comprehensive Plan)”.

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: The traffic generated by permitting the zone change is expected to be minimal and shouldn’t change, since the use is already in place.

Parking Requirements: Based on the Zoning Ordinance, the current

parking is sufficient, since the subject property is not undergoing a change of occupancy, 25% increase in size or 50% increase in value.

Parking Provided: N/A Related Specific Use Standards: N/A Density: N/A Notification Required?: Yes Notifications Sent: 12

Responses in Favor: 1 Responses in Opposition: 1

Analysis:

In order to approve this request, the Planning Commission members are first required to find that: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible

with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.

2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.

3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.

4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment.

5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.

6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.

7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.

The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. Changing the zoning from CN to PD will be consistent with the zoning ordinance and will also be compatible with the City of San Angelo’s Comprehensive Plan. This Plan calls for “Neighborhood Center” for the subject property. The “Neighborhood Center” classification is meant to facilitate a mix of uses, allowing for increased activity, interest, and long-term viability. Comprehensive Plan continues, including an intent to revitalize aged commercial corridors and blend commercial areas into neighborhoods. Also the

Comprehensive Plan calls for the development of commercial nodes, a change from commercial corridor. Since, the subject property is currently zoned CN and is not connecting to a commercial corridor, the zone change will not be contributing to the creation of a major commercial belt and thus meets an objective of the Vision Plan’s Neighborhood Center. The proposed zone change will allow diversification of uses that can be compatible with existing land uses on adjacent properties by placing development standards, which the site will comply with. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is promoting the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of San Angelo. As such, with the development standards in place, the zone change will conform to the objectives of the zoning ordinance. In addition the zone change will not adversely affect the natural environment. Also, the PD zoning will allow the city to place standards on the subject property which will increase the subject property’s compatibility with the surrounding areas.

Proposed Conditions

The staff recommendation the following conditions for the Planned Development: 1. Required Privacy Fence. A privacy fence shall be required, which screens all out-

door uses.

a. The fence shall be an opaque wood fence

b. If security features are added to the fence, they must be screened from the public right-of-way and the fence may not exceed the height of 8’, based on the approved variance granted earlier this year (re: ZBA 11-16).

2. Off-Street Parking. If the parking area is expanded beyond the center ownership

parcel, more specifically, the 1.00 acre of the Rode Survey, the expansion must be paved and meet all standards of Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance.

3. Visual Clearance. The vision clearance triangle will be met as outlined in Section

510 of the City of San Angelo’s Zoning Ordinance.

Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from 2009 Vision Map;

excerpt from draft minute record of August 15, 2011 meeting; and

draft ordinance. Presentation: Jesus Vazquez, Planner Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager (8/15/2011)

Excerpt from August 15, 2011 Planning Commission meeting - DRAFT A. Z 11-11: Atmos Energy

a request for approval of a zone change from Neighborhood Commercial (CN) district zone to Planned Development (PD) district zone, on the following property: 1730 North Main Street, an approximately 2.6 acre tract of property formed by segments of surveys, bordered by North Emerick Street on the west, East 18th Street on the north, North Main Street on the east, and East 14th Street on the south, in north central San Angelo. Jesus Vazquez, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the recommendation of approval. 12 notifications were sent out, with 2 received in favor and 0 received in opposition. The subject property is surrounded by residential areas and commercial areas. The current zoning districts that would allow such an intensive use are not appropriate for the area, due to the residential character of the established neighborhoods to the north and the south. Mr. Vazquez and Ms. Fawver explained the issue and purpose(s) behind the Planned Development district. Such a rezoning would alleviate the current issue of an unlawful expansion outside of the original special permit allowing this use at this location. In addition, it combines features which are not all currently encompassed within a single zoning district. That is, it would allow unlimited outside storage, provide opaque screening to provide mitigation for the surrounding areas, and allow the use categories of “industrial services”, “office”, and “warehouse and freight movement.” Ron Beard, a citizen, came forward to speak on this request. He spoke to the traffic control devices that are in place. Sam Tambunga also asked about the traffic control measures, and the chairman Ben Jenkins made the motion to approve, subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report, with Joe Grimes seconding the motion. The motion was passed unanimously, 7-0.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1730 North Main Street, an approximately 2.6 acre tract of property formed by segments of surveys, bordered by North Emerick Street on the west, East 18th Street on the north, North Main Street on the east, and East 14th Street on the south, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: PD 11-01; also known as Z 11-11: ATMOS Energy

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW THEREFORE,

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 1730 North Main Street, an approximately 2.6 acre tract of property formed by segments of surveys, bordered by North Emerick Street on the west, East 18th Street on the north, North Main Street on the east, and East 14th Street on the south, in north central San Angelo shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Planned Development (PD) District to allow a combination of office, aggregate and materials storage, accessory parking, and contractor usage. The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.

SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this

amendment: SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 5: Except as otherwise specified or limited below, the use and development of the subject property shall generally conform to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning district. A. A privacy fence made of wood and solidly opaque that meets all standards

of Section 804 of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be required, to screen all outdoor uses and storage.

B. If security features are added to the fence, they must be screened from the

public right-of-way and the fence may not exceed the height of 8’, based on the approved variance granted earlier this year (re: ZBA 11-16).

C. If the parking area is expanded beyond the center ownership parcel, more

specifically, the 1.0 acre tract of the Rode Survey, the expansion must be paved and meet all standards of Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance.

D. The vision clearance triangle will be met as outlined in Section 510 of the

City of San Angelo’s Zoning Ordinance. INTRODUCED on the 6th day of September, 2011 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 20th day of September, 2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

by:____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: by:________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date: September 6, 2011

To: Mayor and City Council members

From: Jeff Hintz, Planner

Subject: Z 11-13 City of San Angelo otherwise known as PD 11-02, a

request for approval of a Zone Change from Single Family Residential (RS-1) to a Planned Development (PD).

Location: 501 Rio Concho Drive, a roughly 9.1-acre tract at the northwest corner

of Rio Concho & Surber Drives, specifically occupying Lots 17 & 18 (except the south 357’) and a segment of the north part (a portion of River Drive) of the Fort Concho River Lots Addition in central San Angelo.

Purpose: Approving this zone change will allow for a Planned Development

(PD) zoning designation for the San Angelo Convention Center.

Contacts: Anthony Wilson 325-653-3528

AJ Fawver, Planning Manager 325-657-4210

Caption: Public Hearing and consideration of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12,

Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 11-13: City of San Angelo AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE

OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 501 Rio Concho Drive, a roughly 9.1-acre tract at the northwest corner of Rio Concho & Surber Drives, specifically occupying Lots 17 & 18 (except the south 357’) and a segment of the north part (a portion of River Drive) of the Fort Concho River Lots Addition, changing the zoning

classification from Single Family Residential (RS-1) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary: The City Council may:

(1) approve the proposed zone change;

(2) modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be more

appropriate; or

(3) deny the proposed zone change.

Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change.

The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to approve this request on August 15, 2011. The River Corridor Commission voted 5-0 to approve this request on August 23, 2011.

History and Background:

It was brought to the attention of Planning staff that the Convention Center is operating in a Single-Family Residential district with a special use permit, when being approached about some signage question. At the request of the Civic Events Manager, and as part of the Planning staff’s pursuit to ensure all City-owned properties are zoned properly, the possibility of a zoning designation that would be more appropriate for the convention center’s operations was examined.

General Information

Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential (RS-1) Existing Land Use: City of San Angelo Convention Center Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: RS-1 Park West: CG Hotel & Conference Center South: ML & RS-1 Single Family Housing & Vacant Lot East: RM-1 Senior Living

Thoroughfares/Streets: Rio Concho Drive is defined as a “parkway”.

Surber Drive is a “local street”. Zoning History: Special Permit 392 was approved for an

apartment development in April of 1971. Special

Permit 544 was approved in November of 1976 and allowed the use of a convention center.

Applicable Regulations: N/A Development Standards: N/A Vision Plan Map: Campus/Institutional Related Comp Plan Excerpts: The convention center is described in the

Comprehensive Plan as Catalyst #1. The Plan states, “…the convention center should be the focal point of a multi-purpose area of mixed-use, maximizing the amount of activity in and around it.”

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: No additional traffic is expected to be generated from this zone change.

Parking Requirements: N/A Parking Provided: N/A Related Specific Use Standards: N/A Density: N/A Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 9

Responses in Favor: 0 Responses in Opposition: 0

Analysis:

In order to approve this request, the Planning Commission members are first required to consider the following Amendment Criteria:

1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.

2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.

3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed

amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.

4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment.

5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.

6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.

7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.

The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. Changing the zoning from RS-1 to a Planned Development (PD) will be consistent with the zoning ordinance and compatible with the 2009 Comprehensive Plan for San Angelo. The Comprehensive Plan Map calls for a “Civic/Institutional” use for this parcel and a PD will allow for exactly that. The parcels near and surrounding the convention center will not be affected by the zone change and development patterns in the area will not be affected by a zoning change. The PD will generally conform to that of a General Commercial (CG) district in terms of setbacks, floor area ratio, and lot size. The uses allowed at the convention center typically follow what would be classified in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance as: special event type one and two, major entertainment events, offices, and community services. Additional conditions for the Planned Development on the convention center site can be found in the next section of this report. As the property owner of the convention center site, the City should be proactive in following the Comprehensive Plan and setting a good precedent in following what the future calls for. An RS-1 zoning designation is not the most appropriate for a parcel that draws large numbers of people for events and civic functions; staff believes a Planned Development zoning would be the most beneficial for the convention center and the community.

Proposed Conditions

1. No signage allowed on the southernmost and westernmost boundaries of the property, which are adjacent to developed residential areas;

2. If parking areas are increased, drought-resistant landscaping or xeriscaping shall be provided. Landscaping will be subject to administrative approval by the Planning Manager, with appeals directed to the Planning Commission;

3. A maximum of 1000 square feet of the site will be permitted for outdoor storage;

4. New signage shall not exceed fifteen feet in length, five feet in height, and a depth of two feet;

5. Allowed events include: conferences and conventions, meetings, banquets, performances (music, dance, comedy, speaking engagements), trade shows, private events (weddings, parties, family gatherings, dinners), job training, and educational seminars;

6. Must follow Section 12.612 of the Sign Ordinance regarding illumination; and

7. City Council shall authorize, with this approval, the removal of any special permit(s) on the site from the official zoning map.

Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property;

aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from 2009 Vision Map; excerpt from draft minute record of August 15th meeting; and draft ordinance.

Presentation: Jeff Hintz, Planner

Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager (8/15/2011)

C. Z 11-13: City of San Angelo

a request for approval of a zone change from Single Family Residential (RS-1) to Planned Development (PD) on the following property:

501 Rio Concho Drive, a roughly 9.1-acre tract at the northwest corner of Rio Concho & Surber Drives, specifically occupying Lots 17 & 18 (except the south 357’) and a segment of the north part (a portion of River Drive) of the Fort Concho River Lots Addition in central San Angelo.

Jeff Hintz, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the recommendation of approval. This request is originated by the city for the current McNease Convention Center. Nine notifications were sent out, with zero returned in favor or in opposition to the request. This was an item that was brought to staff when it was discovered that the current site is actually zoned for residential use, which is inconsistent with the current (and expected long-term) use of the location. Mr. Hintz reviewed the conditions staff recommends for approval. He also reviewed the Comprehensive Plan excerpts that are relevant to the location and this request. Sam Tambunga asked if the reason for the change was entirely based upon the signage or if there were other reasons. Mr. Hintz explained that the signage was something had really brought this issue to light. Anthony Wilson, Civic Events manager, came forward to speak in favor of this request. He explained that he had been working with the Planning Division staff to put together a request that would better fit in with the area and would be better for the uses, as they are projected to be in place long-term. The City’s investment in this facility is considerable. Ben Jenkins made the motion to approve, which Sam Tambunga seconded, subject to all conditions as outlined in the staff report. The motion passed unanimously, 7-0.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 501 Rio Concho Drive, a roughly 9.1-acre tract at the northwest corner of Rio Concho & Surber Drives, specifically occupying Lots 17 & 18 (except the south 357’) and a segment of the north part (a portion of River Drive) of the Fort Concho River Lots Addition, changing the zoning classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: PD 11-02: City of San Angelo

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing

body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW THEREFORE,

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted

by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 501 Rio Concho Drive, a roughly 9.1-acre tract at the northwest corner of Rio Concho & Surber Drives, specifically occupying Lots 17 & 18 (except the south 357’) and a segment of the north part (a portion of River Drive) of the Fort Concho River Lots Addition shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Planned Development (PD) District for a full service the Convention Center.

The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.

SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described

property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:

SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,

if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:

PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 5: Except as otherwise specified or limited below, the use and development of the subject property shall generally conform to a General Commercial (CG) zoning district.

A. No signage allowed on the southernmost and westernmost boundaries of

the property, which are adjacent to developed residential areas; B. If parking areas are increased, drought-resistant landscaping or xeriscaping

shall be provided. Landscaping will be subject to administrative approval by the Planning Manager, with appeals directed to the Planning Commission;

C. A maximum of 1000 square feet of the site will be permitted for outdoor

storage; D. New signage shall not exceed fifteen feet in length, five feet in height, and a

depth of two feet; E. Allowed events include: conferences and conventions, meetings, banquets,

performances (music, dance, comedy, speaking engagements), trade shows, private events (weddings, parties, family gatherings, dinners), job training, and educational seminars;

F. Must follow Section 12.612 of the Sign Ordinance regarding illumination;

and G. Planning Commission shall authorize, with this approval, the removal of any

special permit(s) on the site from the official zoning map.

INTRODUCED on the 6th day of September, 2011 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 20th day of September, 2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

by:____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:

by:________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date: September 6, 2011

To: Mayor and City Council members

From: Jeff Hintz, Planner

Subject: Z 11-14 COSA Planning Commission requesting a zone change on

a combination of Multi-Family Residence (RM-1) and General Commercial/Heavy Commercial (CG/CH) to the Central Business (CB) district, for the following properties.

Location: Area generally bounded by North Oakes Street on the west, East/West

3rd Street on the north, Gillis Street on the west, and East/West College Avenue on the south, in addition to one block generally bounded by Gillis Street on the west, West 2nd Street on the north, North Irving Street on the west, and West 1st Street on the south in central San Angelo

Purpose: Approving this zone change will allow for the aforementioned

properties to have a CBD zoning designation

Contacts: COSA Planning Commission

Jeff Hintz, Planner 325-657-4210

Caption: Public Hearing and consideration of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12,

Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo Z 11-14: City of San Angelo Planning Commission AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE

OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND

CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: Area generally bounded by North Oakes Street on the west, East/West 3rd Street on the north, Gillis Street on the west, and East/West College Avenue on the south, in addition to one block generally bounded by

Gillis Street on the west, West 2nd Street on the north, North Irving Street on the west, and West 1st Street on the south, changing the zoning classification from Multi-Familiy Residence and General Commercial/Heavy Commercial, (RM-1 and CG/CH) to Central Business District (CB) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary: The City Council may:

(1) approve the proposed zone change;

(2) modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be more

appropriate; or

(3) deny the proposed zone change.

Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change.

The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to approve this request on August 15, 2011

History and Background:

The proposed CBD expansion area encompasses zoning categories of CG/CH, CG, and RM-1. CG/CH is the dominant zoning category being replaced in this grouping of properties for CBD expansion. The proposed CBD expansion is bounded to the south by the CBD zoning district. To the east of this expansion area are the zoning categories of CG and RM-1. North of the expansion area is zoned ML and to the west the zoning categories of CN and RM-1 are present. Downtown San Angelo was also notified via email of this zone change preceding; a map and description of the areas affected was also included in this email. On February 28, of 2011 a special meeting was conducted with the Planning Commission to discuss expansion of the CBD. On April 18th at the Planning Commission meeting, it was determined that the CBD would be expanded to the east and south as Planning staff had recommended. This request was presented and approved on May 16 of 2011by a unanimous vote of the Plan Commission. At the May 16th meeting, staff was directed to look into additional expansion of the CBD to the north; specifically, the areas included in this zoning case.

General Information

Zoning History: The proposed expansion includes two approved

zoning cases; SP 365 allowing for a light machine shop. SP 95-22 allows offices for a social service agency.

Applicable Regulations: Alcohol sales will be allowed by right in the CBD; Off-street parking requirements are also waived. In addition, no setbacks are required in the CBD zoning designation.

Development Standards: N/A Vision Plan Map: Downtown Related Comp Plan Excerpts:The downtown portion of the Comprehensive Plan

calls for development of an entertainment district and civic activity district in conjunction with, catalyst projects that would all be possible with the CBD zoning designation.

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: This proposed zone change is not expected to change traffic patterns

Parking Requirements: N/A Parking Provided: N/A Related Specific Use Standards: N/A Density: The CBD is one of the more densely developed

areas within San Angelo Notification Required?: Yes Notifications Sent: 51

Responses in Favor: 0 Responses in Opposition: 0

Analysis:

In order to approve this request, the Planning Commission members are first required to consider the following Amendment Criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible

with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.

2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.

3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.

4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment.

5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.

6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.

7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.

The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. Staff believes that a zoning change to CBD will be consistent with the 2009 Comprehensive Plan which calls for the properties previously mentioned to be classified as “Downtown.” CBD fits this vision and is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance for the city. This designation of CBD is compatible with the development patterns of the city and will fit within the context of the surrounding area. Staff believes that the CBD zone will generally conform to existing businesses and land uses in the area. The CBD is an appropriate designation for the types of activities and events that occur in the area. In the event that a business in existence is not allowed by right in the CBD, that business would be allowed to continue; the business would be legally non-conforming. Trying to describe every business in this proposed zone change area would not do justice to the area or local businesses; it is however, believed by staff that the businesses currently in operation would be allowed by the CBD zoning category anyhow. This zone change should not have a detrimental effect on the natural environment and is not expected to alter the character of the community. Staff also believes this zone change will be beneficial to the community. Changing the zoning designation will allow for the growth of the CBD into a vibrant growing, commercial area. Currently this area of San Angelo is under-utilized as a commercial area; staff believes a zone change would revitalize this area and allow for greater development of the central commercial area of the city.

Proposed Conditions

N/A

Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property;

aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from draft minute record of August 15th Meeting; and draft ordinance.

Presentation: Jeff Hintz, Planner

Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager (8/8/2011)

D. Z 11-14: COSA Planning Commission

a request for approval of a zone change from combination of Multi-Family Residence (RM-1) and General Commercial/Heavy Commercial (CG/CH) to the Central Business (CB) district, in an area generally bounded by: North Oakes Street on the west, East/West 3rd Street on the north, Gillis Street on the west, and East/West College Avenue on the south, in addition to one block generally bounded by Gillis Street on the west, West 2nd Street on the north, North Irving Street on the west, and West 1st Street on the south, in central San Angelo.

Jeff Hintz, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval. There were fifty-six (56) notifications sent out, with one received in favor and zero received in opposition. This is the third of three phases of a CBD expansion that the Planning Commission instructed staff to carry out earlier this year. One of the predominant features in this area is vacant properties. Mr. Hintz described the zoning around the area in question. Mr. Hintz described the multiple zoning designations and uses within the subject area. The Comprehensive Plan for the city calls for “downtown” for this area. The uses in place will be allowed to continue, even if they are not allowed by right in the CBD; so long as they do not fall vacant for a period of one year, they are considered legally non-conforming. Mr. Hintz also reviewed the unique characteristics of the CBD zoning category and reminded the Commission that a public school is within 300’ of a good portion of this expansion, and that City ordinance does not allow alcoholic beverage sales this close. Sam Tambunga asked about the parking – Mr. Hintz answered that businesses could provide parking if they wanted to, but was not required to. No one came forward to speak in favor or opposition. Joe Grimes made the motion to approve as presented, which Bill Wynne seconded. The motion passed unanimously, 7-0.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: Area generally bounded by North Oakes Street on the west, East/West 3rd Street on the north, Gillis Street on the west, and East/West College Avenue on the south, in addition to one block generally bounded by Gillis Street on the west, West 2nd Street on the north, North Irving Street on the west, and West 1st Street on the south, changing the zoning classification from Multi-Family Residential and General Commercial/Heavy Commercial (RM-1 and CG/CH) to Central Business (CB)

District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY RE: Z 11-14: COSA Planning Commission

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing

body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW THEREFORE,

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted

by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: Area generally bounded by North Oakes Street on the west, East/West 3rd Street on the north, Gillis Street on the west, and East/West College Avenue on the south, in addition to one block generally bounded by Gillis Street on the west, West 2nd Street on the north, North Irving Street on the west, and West 1st Street on the south shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Central Business (CB) District.

The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.

SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described

property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:

SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,

if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:

PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.

INTRODUCED on the 6th day of September, 2011 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 20th day of September, 2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

by:____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:

by:________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

City of San

Angelo

Memo

Meeting Date: September 6, 2011

To: Mayor and City Council members

From: Jesus Vazquez, Planner

Subject: Z 11-16, a request for approval of a zoning change from Two-Family Residence (RS-2) district to Office Commercial (CO) district zone, on the following property:

Location: 1814 Ward Street, about 122’ southeast from the

intersection of Ward Street and Pecos Street. An approximately 0.0845 acre tract (specifically Lot 14 and a 36’ section out of the abutting Lots of 15 and 13, Dawson- Eddiemann subdivision), in central San Angelo.

Purpose: Approving the zone change to allow office use.

Contacts: Joann Jones, First National Bank (325) 387-3861

AJ Fawver, Planning Manager (325) 657-4210

Caption: Public Hearing and consideration of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-16: First National Bank

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1814 Ward Street, about 122’ southeast from the intersection of Ward Street and Pecos Street. An approximately 0.0845 acre tract (specifically Lot 14 and a 36’ section out of the abutting Lots of 15 and 13, Dawson-

Eddiemann subdivision), in central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Two-Family Residence (RS-2) to Office Commercial (CO) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary: The City Council may:

(1) recommend approving the proposed zone change;

(2) modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be more appropriate; or

(3) recommend denying the proposed zone change.

Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to approve this request on August 15, 2011.

History and Background:

General Information

Existing Zoning: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) Existing Land Use: Office building, the building is currently

vacant Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: RS-2 Residences West: CO Office Use South: RS-2 Commercial Use East: RS-2 Residences

Thoroughfares/Streets: Ward Street is defined as a “local street” Zoning History: The subject property holds a Special

Permit, SP 336, which allows the existing building on the subject property to be used as an office building.

Applicable Regulations: All RS-2 regulations, including those for setbacks, minimum lot size, floor area ratio, and use regulations.

Development Standards: N/A Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood Center Related Comp Plan Excerpts: N/A

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: No change in traffic is expected, as location is already functional as an office.

Parking Requirements: The ratio for office use is 1:300 sq ft of

gross floor area. However, the current parking is sufficient, since the subject property is not undergoing a change of occupancy, 25% increase in size or 50% increase in value.

Parking Provided: Four parking spaces are provided on-site. Related Specific Use Standards: N/A Density: N/A Notification Required?: Yes Notifications Sent: 18

Responses in Favor: 0 Responses in Opposition: 0

Analysis: In order to approve this request, the Planning Commission members are first required to find that:

1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.

2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which

the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.

3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.

4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment.

5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.

6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.

7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.

The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. Changing the zoning from RS-2 to CO will be consistent with the zoning ordinance and will also be compatible with the City of San Angelo’s Comprehensive Plan. The map within this Plan calls for “Neighborhood Center” for the subject property. The Office Commercial zoning will be consistent in that the intent of the Comprehensive Plan’s “Neighborhood Center” is to facilitate a mix of uses, allowing for increased activity, interest, and long-term viability. Since, the subject property is located primarily within an area dominated by RS-2, the site will not contribute to creating a major commercial belt and thus meets the primary intent to create nodes or centers of commercial activities. The CO zoning classification is one of the least intensive of the commercial district classifications and therefore would not be extremely intrusive to the surrounding residential areas. The intensity and use of a CO zone would have little, if any, adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhoods, especially since this location is one of the few sites fronting Ward Street, and it does not share the front of the block with any residential use. Also, CO zoning uses do not generate major traffic and only allow outdoor display for outside use. A higher commercial zoning classification would be detrimental to this established neighborhood.

Proposed Conditions

Authorization for staff to remove the unneeded Special Permit from the official Zoning Map.

Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property;

aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from 2009 Vision Map; excerpt from draft minute record of August 15,

2011; and draft ordinance. Presentation: Jesus Vazquez, Planner Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager (8/15/2011)

Excerpt from August 15, 2011 Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT E. Z 11-16: First National Bank

a request for approval of a zone change from Two-Family Residence (RS-2) zoning to Office Commercial (CO) zoning, on the following property:

1814 Ward Street, about 122’ southeast from the intersection of Ward Street and Pecos Street. An approximately 0.0845 acre tract, specifically Lot 14 and a 36’ section out of the abutting Lots of 15 and 13, Dawson-Eddiemann subdivision, in central San Angelo.

Jesus Vazquez, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval, subject to conditions outlined in the staff report. Eighteen notifications were sent out, with no notifications returned in favor or in opposition. The Comprehensive Plan for the city calls for this area to be a “neighborhood center”. The subject property holds a special permit, which allows an office use to be put in place. Mr. Vazquez explained that the CO zoning is intended to blend well with the surrounding residential neighborhood. JoAnn Jones, vice-president of the First National Bank of Sonora, came forward to speak in favor of the request. The bank is currently trying to market the property and just realized that the area is zoned residential. The Chairman asked how many units were in place, and the proponent explained that there were three units. Ben Jenkins made the motion to approve the request as presented, which Brad Fly seconded. The Commission approved this unanimously, 7-0.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1814 Ward Street, about 122’ southeast from the intersection of Ward Street and Pecos Street. An approximately 0.0845 acre tract (specifically Lot 14 and a 36’ section out of the abutting Lots of 15 and 13, Dawson- Eddiemann subdivision), in central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Two-Family Residence (RS-2) to Office Commercial (CO) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY RE: Z 11-16: First National Bank

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 1814 Ward Street, about 122’ southeast from the intersection of Ward Street and Pecos Street. An approximately 0.0845 acre tract (specifically Lot 14 and a 36’ section out of the abutting Lots of 15 and 13, Dawson- Eddiemann subdivision), in central San Angelo shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Office Commercial (CO) District. The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.

SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment: SEVERABILITY:

The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment: PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense. INTRODUCED on the 6th day of September, 2011 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 20th day of September, 2011. THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

by:____________________________________ Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST: by:________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

����� �� ������ �� �������� ���������

����

Phase II

SURVEY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES

SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

2011

Prepared for the City of San Angelo Planning Department

and the San Angelo Historic Preservation Commission

By

Mary G. Saltarelli

Preservation Consultant

This project was funded in part through a Certified Local Government Grant from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, as administered by the Texas Historical Commission. The contents and opinions, however, do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental Federally Assisted Programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S.

ii

Department of the Interior, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, D.C. 20013-7127.

iii

Table of Contents

Chapter 1 Introduction 1

Chapter 2 Historic Preservation and Cultural Renaissance in the Phase II Survey Area 3 Chapter 3

Phase II Survey Area Historic Contexts and Patterns of Settlement and Development 11

Chapter 4

Survey Methodology 21 Chapter 5

Observations 25 Chapter 6

Results and Recommendations 31 Chapter 7

High Priority Properties Not Previously Documented 41 Bibliography 57 Appendix A Surveyed Resources Inventory Data Sheets Appendix B High Priority Properties Survey Forms Appendix C Photo Index Sheets and Black and White Contact Sheets and Negatives Appendix D

Update on Buildings And Grounds of Fort Concho Since 1980 Master Plan for Redevelopment by Bob Bluthardt

Appendix E

Map of Survey Area Showing Locations of Resources (STARS INDICATE HIGH-PRIORITY RESOURCES)

iv

List of Figures Fig. 1-1. Phase II Survey Area. 2 Figure 2-1. Old Town Historic District, Approved by San Angelo City Council in 2010. 9 Fig. 3-1. Covered Wagons and Families at Old Fort Concho. 11 Figure 3-2. Officer’s Row at Fort Concho, 1871. 12 Figure 3-3. Enlisted Men’s Barracks at Old Fort Concho. 12 Figure 3-4. Mexican American Family Living Under South Oakes Street Bridge. 14 Figure 3-5. Mexican American House Near Old Fort Concho. 14 Figure 3-6. Kansas City, Mexico, and Orient Passenger Depot. 15 Figure 3-7. Chadbourne Street Viaduct, Completed in 1913. 16 Figure 3-8. McIntire’s Drive-In, Built Along South Chadbourne Street in 1952. 19 Figure 5-1. Earliest Neighborhood Mapped South of North Concho by Sanborn Map Company (1908), which is now known as Fort Concho Addition. 26 Figure 5-2. Old Photo of 134 Allen Street in the Fort Concho Addition, Date Unknown. 26 Figure 5-3. 134 Allen Street today. 27 Figure 5-4. Troy Laundry’s 1920s-era signage. 27 Figure 5-5. Banner Creamery Factory and Warehouse, built between 1931 and 1949. 28 Figure 5-6. Jack Kelly’s Drive-In in 1948. 28 Figure 5-6. 119 West Avenue B, a Craftsman-style Bungalow built before 1920. 29 Figure 5-7. 221 West Avenue B, a Folk Victorian house built circa 1905. 29 Figure 6-1. Map showing Areas of Four Proposed New Historic Districts. 39

v

List of Tables

Table 2-1. Properties Within the Phase II Area Listed in the National Register of Historic Places. 2 Table 2-2. Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks Within the Phase II Survey Area. 7 Table 2-3. San Angelo Historic Landmarks and Overlay Zones Within the Phase II Survey Area. 8 Table 6-1. High Priority Properties in the Phase II Survey Area. 34 Table 6-2. Endangered High Priority Properties in Phase II Survey Area. 35

1

Chapter 1 Introduction

This report, Phase II Survey of Historic Resources, supplements and expands upon the Phase I Survey of Historic Resources report prepared and completed for the City of San Angelo in 2006. The Phase 1 Survey encompassed most of the Central Business District north of the Concho River, bordered by the Houston-Harte Expressway to the north, Main Street to the east, and the North Concho River to the south and west.

The Phase II survey area covered by this report is south of the North Concho River,

encompasses the original site of Fort Concho, and expands southward toward the passenger and freight depots built for the Kansas City, Mexico, and Orient Railroad during the early twentieth century. The survey area covered by this report is outlined in more detail below.

The area south of the North Concho River in San Angelo first developed as the site of Fort Concho, a military outpost established on the Texas frontier in 1867. Selected for its proximity to fresh, flowing waters, the fort commanded a high, open plateau where the North, Middle, and South Concho Rivers join together.

As Fort Concho grew and developed from 1867 through 1872, the city of San Angelo began as a cluster of gambling dens and saloons that the soldiers called “Across the River.” Encouraged by increased wages and staffing at the fort and a growing cattle industry during the 1870s, early settlers Bart DeWhitt and W.S. Veck brought land promotion and store establishments to the small town, which DeWhitt christened Santa Angela. With the opening of a U.S. Post Office, the city became known as San Angelo. During the 1880s, San Angelo became the county seat of Tom Green County, bringing the original little enclave more respectability.

Meanwhile, the area immediately surrounding the fort developed more slowly. J.L. Millspaugh, a Fort Concho sutler during the 1870s, established San Angelo’s first waterworks in 1884. By 1904, the city’s Sanborn Insurance Maps show the waterworks located south of Fort Concho along the South Concho River, just outside the Phase II survey area, where a water facility remains today.

As Fort Concho’s licensed military sutler, Millspaugh had acquired land adjacent to the

fort. The city’s Sanborn Insurance Map of 1904 shows the first addition platted in the survey area, the Millspaugh Addition, located just south of the river and west of Fort Concho. Not until 16 years after the U.S. Military abandoned Fort Concho in 1889 did developers C.A. Broome and Louis Farr establish the Fort Concho Realty Company and plat the Fort Concho Addition. The addition’s first houses were built just after the turn of the twentieth century.

With the arrival of the Kansas City, Mexico and Orient Railroad to the area south of the river in 1909, settlement around the old fort boomed. Residences were built for railroad workers, and businesses erected to serve the railroad and its workers. The Permian Basin oil boom of the 1920s brought the railroad more business and the neighborhood more development.

2

Today, the area just south of the North Concho River in San Angelo is an eclectic mixture of residential, commercial, and cultural development. Beginning with preservation efforts in the early 1900s, the community has restored much of Fort Concho and the National Park Service has designated it as a National Historic Landmark.

The City of San Angelo owns and maintains many of the other historic landmarks in the

Phase II survey area, including the two railroad stations and the municipal swimming pool. The area along the southern banks of the North Concho is now home to the San Angelo Visitor Center and the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts. During the 1990s, the city created El Paseo de Santa Angela, a park featuring pathways, two Mission Revival-style pavilion buildings and a tiered plaza. The Paseo connects Fort Concho National Historic Landmark, the Historic Orient-Santa Fe Depots and the Concho River.

Survey Area

This 2010 – 2011 Phase II Survey of Historic Resources in San Angelo basically encompasses the Central Business District south of the Concho River, the site of old Fort Concho, and the neighborhoods surrounding them (See Fig. 1). The area surveyed is bordered by the Concho River to the north, South Koenigheim St. to the west, Rust St. and the railroad tracks to the east, and Washington Street to the south. The Phase II Survey Area encompasses 51 city blocks.

Fig. 1-1. Phase II Survey Area.

3

Chapter 2 Historic Preservation and Cultural Renaissance in the Phase II Survey Area

The closing decades of the twentieth century brought a remarkable array of preservation projects, revitalization initiatives, and community development improvements to the Phase II survey area south of the North Concho River. Fostered by civic pride and dedication, public-private partnerships and funds preserved architectural treasures and planted the seeds for new assets. Preserving and Restoring Old Fort Concho

As early as 1905, J.L. Millspaugh, the former Fort Concho sutler, recommended that the City of San Angelo purchase the entire fort site for fifteen thousand dollars.1 This was the same

year that C.A. Broome and his associates platted the Fort Concho Addition and opened the area up for development. In 1913, the Santa Fe Railroad donated the eastern third of the fort’s parade ground to the city, and that section of land remained undeveloped. In 1923, the local chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution launched a project to save the fort, but their funds fell short and they erected a marker at the site. During the 1920s, Ginevra Wood Carson created the West Texas Museum. In 1930, she moved the museum to the fort’s old headquarters museum. For the three decades, she coordinated preservation efforts at old Fort Concho. The City of San Angelo began to acquire many of the buildings, and the fort and museum were made a unit of city government by 1955. In 1961, the National Park Service declared Fort Concho a National Historic Landmark. Later in the decade, the fort hired its first professionally trained staff. Volunteers followed Mrs. Carson in working tirelessly to raise money to purchase buildings and land that had originally been part of the fort. In 1980, the fort’s board of directors and staff commissioned the architectural firm of Bell, Klein, and Hoffman to prepare a Master Plan for Development and Restoration of Fort Concho. The master plan spurred partnerships with other non-profit groups like the Junior League that resulted in building restoration and re-use. During the 1980s, the old Southern Ward School on the parade grounds was torn down, and a new school constructed nearby. The fort’s board of directors raised the funds to buy the Monarch Tile facility on South Oakes Street, reclaiming Enlisted Men’s Barracks 1 and 2. The fort reconstructed its old hospital building in its original form. All of these projects met the recommendations of the 1980 Master Plan. With the old school and other business buildings that had been constructed along South Oakes Street removed, the fort’s original parade grounds was open for the first time in nearly a century. Fort director Robert Bluthardt wrote, “Now you could ‘see’ the fort across the open field and the same impressive vista offered itself to passing drivers on South Oakes Street.”2

4

Fort Concho National Historic Landmark is now a strong heritage tourism attraction in San Angelo and the destination that brings many visitors to town. The Phase II Survey Area that has grown up around the old fort is rich in heritage and cultural assets and attractions, including the Railway Museum of San Angelo in the KCM&O passenger depot, the Old Town Historic District on Orient Street, the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts, and the San Angelo Visitor Center.

Preserving and Restoring Railroad Heritage

In 1985, the Santa Fe Railroad closed the old KCM&O passenger and freight depots. Santa Fe had acquired the KCM&O in 1928. A group of concerned citizens joined together to save the depots from demolition, and formed a non-profit preservation organization, the Historic Orient-Santa Fe Depot, Inc. In partnership with the City of San Angelo, this group completed a $1.1 million restoration of the passenger depot and opened The Railway Museum of San Angelo in 1997. The city restored the freight station and today it serves as the community’s senior citizens center.3

Creating Old Town Historic District

During the 1990s, Historic San Angelo, Inc., and San Angelo Old Town Conservancy, Inc., joined together to create Old Town Historic District. Volunteers with the two groups partnered with the City of San Angelo to raise funds to move five buildings into the Phase II Survey Area along Orient Street. Old Town Historic District features the Zenker House, designed by local architect Oscar Ruffini; the Camunez Store, an old grocery: the Ruffini-designed Baker Building, San Angelo’s first bank; the Bunk House, a small residence recently rehabilitated for office use; and the Hartgrove House, which the Hartgrove family saved from demolition in the late 1960s. Planning for and Building River and Pedestrian Improvements

In 1982, the City of San Angelo established the River Corridor Commission to recommend policies and ordinances controlling development of land along the Concho River. Much of the Phase II survey area falls within the river corridor. In 1990, San Angelo’s River Corridor Commission developed a “River Corridor Master Plan,” which they updated in September 2006 to include design guidelines. The San Angelo River Beautification Project, which began in 1986, created a four-mile river walk along the Concho, a four-block river plaza, and the construction of the Bill Aylor Sr. Memorial Stage, an outdoor performing area behind the municipal pool.

In 1992, an American Institute of Architects Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team visited San Angelo. After meeting with citizens the team prepared a plan called “Connecting the Past to the Future.” Since then, the community has been implementing the plan. The City of San Angelo raised $2.7 million that was leveraged with $10 million of state, federal and private funds

to enhance or complete significant parts of the R/UDAT strategic plan.4

5

Part of the plan called for creating a festival or fiesta plaza and marketplace between Fort Concho and the historic Santa Fe-KCM& O Depot to connect the two historic landmarks. This led to the construction of El Paseo de Santa Angela, a heritage trail featuring pathways, two pavilion buildings, and a tiered plaza to connect Fort Concho National Historic Landmark, the Historic Orient-Santa Fe Depot and the Concho River. Funded by the City of San Angelo and the Meadows Foundation, El Paseo de Santa Angela recalls the Mexican American cultural heritage of the Phase II survey area.

The R/UDAT plan also recommended that a pedestrian connection be built across the North Concho River to connect the Phase II survey area with downtown. In fulfillment of that recommendation, the city built Celebration Bridge, a pedestrian walkway across the Concho River, that connects the stage, museum, Fort Concho, and the historic railroad depots to downtown San Angelo. Developing a Cultural District

In 1981, the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts was chartered. The museum first opened in the restored Quartermaster building at Fort Concho in 1985. When looking for a new, expanded facility, the museum’s board of trustees selected the site next to the outdoor stage that the R/UDAT team recommended for redevelopment. In collaboration with Angelo State University, the museum raised more than $7 million for its new home. In 1999, the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts opened along the south banks of the Concho River, overlooking the river

walk stage.5 The Museum of Fine Arts is restoring an entire block of abandoned historic commercial

buildings along the west side of South Oakes Street, just south of the Oakes Street Bridge. One building, known as the Coop Gallery, is used for private art exhibits, while another serves as a Water Education Center operated jointly by the museum and the Upper Colorado River Authority. Early in the twenty-first century, the San Angelo Chamber of Commerce/ Convention and Visitors Bureau, the Texas Department of Transportation, the City of San Angelo, and the San Angelo Health Foundation collaborated to build the San Angelo Visitor Center on the south banks of the Concho River. Completed in 2004, the project provides office and meeting space for the foundation and the Chamber of Commerce, as well as certain public meeting facilities. Visitors are drawn to the building’s natural setting and link to the river. Previous Survey Work

In 1978, Barbara Wyatt conducted the first survey of historic resources in San Angelo. Cards containing her survey work are on file at the Tom Green County Historical Society Collection at the West Texas Archives at Angelo State University.

In 1984, the Center for History of Engineering and Technology at Texas Tech University conducted a comprehensive survey of historic resources, which was funded by the Junior League of San Angelo and the Texas Historical Commission. This survey documented 557 sites,

6

including residential, commercial, engineering, civic and religious resources. The 1984 survey documentation is on file at the City of San Angelo Planning Department and at the West Texas Archives. Designating Historic Resources

National Designations

Before the 1984 survey, five properties within the City of San Angelo were listed in the National Register of Historic Places, including Fort Concho, the Cactus Hotel, the J.J. Rackley Building and a commercial row of buildings on East Concho Avenue. After the 1984 survey, consultants from Texas Tech submitted a San Angelo Multiple Property Nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. This nomination included 56 individual properties throughout the city, and the Angelo Heights Historic District, a neighborhood west of the North Concho River that contained 62 properties, 46 of which were considered to be contributing to its historic character. The National Park Service approved the nomination, and the buildings and district are now listed in the National Register. Table 2-1 lists resources within the Phase II Survey Area of the City of San Angelo that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 2011.

Landmark Address

Fort Conco National Historic Landmark 630 South Oakes Street

House at 123 Allen 123 Allen

House at 140 Allen 140 Allen

House at 419 West Avenue C 419 West Ave. C

Santa Fe Passenger Depot 700 S. Chadbourne

Santa Fe Railway Freight Depot 700 S. Chadbourne

Municipal Swimming Pool 18 East Ave. A

Table 2-1. Properties Within the Phase II Area Listed in the

National Register of Historic Places.

Statewide Designations

Within San Angelo, there are 13 Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks, recognized for their architectural and historical significance to the state. Table 2-2 lists resources within the survey area that are designated as Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks.

7

Landmark Name

Fort Concho National Historic Landmark

Municipal Swimming Pool

Table 2-2. Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks Within the Phase II Survey Area.

The highest honor the state can bestow on a resource, the Recorded Texas Historic

Landmark designation is a legal one, and comes with a measure of protection. Owners must give the Texas Historical Commission 60 days notice before any alterations are made to the exterior of a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark.

Local Landmarks

In 1993, San Angelo passed its first historic preservation ordinance, which established the city’s Historic Preservation Commission. The city has designated two historic districts and 43 individual properties as historic landmarks. All resources located within a district and all designated individual properties receive historic overlay zoning and are protected by the city’s preservation ordinance. According to the preservation commission, once a property is zoned historic, a step has been taken toward:

1. Protecting the city’s heritage;

2. Preserving and enhancing San Angelo’s attractiveness;

3. Fostering civic pride in accomplishments of the past;

4. Insuring harmonious and efficient growth and development for San Angelo;

5. Promoting the use of landmarks within the City;

6. Encouraging the stabilization and restoration of historic sites.6

Once a historic overlay zone is established for a property, the owner receives local tax abatement benefits from 10 percent to 20 percent of their annual city taxes. A property owner may also request up to a 50 percent real property tax abatement of city taxes to restore and rehabilitate locally zoned historic property. This abatement may remain for a maximum of 10 years, or until the amount of funds abated cover the cost of the restoration or rehabilitation project. See Table 2-3 for a list of San Angelo Historic Landmarks that are protected by historic overlay zoning within the Phase II Survey Area.

8

Landmark or

Historic Overlay Zone

(District) Name

Address

National Designation

Fort Concho National Historic Landmark (District)

630 South Oakes Street *

Old Town Historic District See Figure 2-1

Orient Passenger/Santa Fe Depot

703 South Chadbourne Street

*

Kansas City, Mexico, & Orient Railroad Company Frieght Depot

702 South Chadbourne Street

*

Girl Scout "Little House" 304 West Avenue A

Municipal Pool 18 East Avenue A *

Brick Shop Row 508-512 South Chadbourne Street

1909 Historic Building 516 to 522 South Chadbourne Street

Table 2-3. San Angelo Historic Landmarks and Overlay Zones

Within the Phase II Survey Area.

The most recent historic overlay zone approved by the city council in 2010 is within the Phase II survey area, and is known as Old Town Historic District. This district expanded the existing Old Town block into an area that includes the Municipal Swimming Pool, the river stage, the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts and the historic buildings the museum has restored, and the two historic railroad depots. Figure 2-1 shows the boundaries of the Old Town Historic District. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines were approved for this district.

9

Figure 2-1. Old Town Historic District, Approved by San Angelo City Council in 2010.

Ongoing Improvements and Restoration

The City of San Angelo has two active projects currently in progress within the Phase II Survey Area. The city recently hired the local architectural firm of Kinney-Franke to design river enhancements for the North Concho River Improvement Project. Planned improvements include bank stabilization and park and trail enhancements, including improving access to the river. The first phase of the project, estimated to cost $5 million, will concentrate on the riverbanks from South Oakes Street upriver. This project is funded by 4-B half-cent sales tax revenue.

10

The City of San Angelo Recreation Division is currently undertaking a $3 million renovation of the Municipal Swimming Pool and exterior restoration of the historic pool building. The pool is a Works Progress Administration (WPA) project. It is listed in the National Register of Historic Places and is a San Angelo Historic Landmark. Plans call for this project to be complete in 2012.

11

Chapter 3 Phase II Survey Area

Historic Contexts and Patterns of Settlement and Development

Diverse cultural groups, as well as several significant events, influenced the history and development of the survey area south of the Concho River. Native Americans, U.S. frontier soldiers, African American Buffalo soldiers, Anglo and Mexican settlers, railroad entrepreneurs and workers, and Hispanic residents cultivated the cultural and historical bounty that has shaped San Angelo just south of the Concho River. Native Americans and Establishment of a Frontier Military Outpost

By 1864, when U.S. officers selected the high plateau between the North and South

Concho Rivers as the site of a new frontier fort, the peaceful native Jumanos had been driven away by the nomadic Apache tribes who arrived during the mid-seventeenth century. Comanches and Kiowas joined the Apaches in West Texas at the beginning of the eighteenth century.

The end of the Civil War brought Anglo settlers and cattlemen traveling along the Goodnight-Loving Trail with their herds. Native Americans who roamed, lived, and hunted throughout the Southern Plains fought for their domain, raiding Anglo homesteads, pioneers, supply wagon trains, and cowboys, stealing horses and cattle. Fort Concho’s location provided ample water for a military post, and its location along the frontier line provided protection for the increasing numbers of settlers who ventured west into the area.

Fig. 3-1. Covered Wagons and Families at Old Fort Concho.

Courtesy Fort Concho Historic Landmark.

In 1868, workmen erected the first permanent native limestone buildings at Fort Concho:

the quartermaster’s storehouse and the commissary. Both buildings stand today, and along with

12

the Fort’s fifteen other original built resources, they are the oldest in the survey area. Building at Fort Concho lasted for the next eleven years, culminating with completion of the chapel-schoolhouse in 1879.

Figure 3-2. Officer’s Row at Fort Concho, 1871. Courtesy Fort Concho

Historic Landmark.

At the height of Fort Concho’s Texas frontier service, 200 to 300 enlisted men lived at

the fort along with several officers and some of their families.7 In the fall of 1872, Col. Ranald S. Mackenzie and his 4th Cavalry captured 130 Quahadi Comanche women and children during a battle near the north fork of the Red River. The captive Native Americans spent the winter at Fort Concho.

Figure 3-3. Enlisted Men’s Barracks at Old Fort Concho. Courtesy Fort Concho

Historic Landmark.

After Mackenzie’s successful offensive campaign against Comanches and Kiowas in

1874, Fort Concho’s mission changed to keeping the peace. In 1875, Col. Benjamin Grierson and his 10th Cavalry took over command of Fort Concho. Grierson commanded the fort until 1882 and the African American Buffalo Soldiers of the 10th Cavalry until 1890. Many of the African Americans who served at Fort Concho settled in San Angelo, lending their cultural influence.

The land that became Fort Concho never belonged to the U.S. Army, but was leased from

other owners. San Antonio businessmen and post suppliers H.B. Adams and Edwin DeLacy Wickes leased the land to the military. Seventy acres of land adjacent to the fort passed in ownership from one early post sutler to another, culminating in 1876 with J.L. Millspaugh. Upon this land sat the limestone post sutler store and saloon. The Post Council complained to

13

Millspaugh about inferior goods, exorbitant prices, and after-hours and Sunday business, especially in the saloon, where Millspaugh sold “very poor quality liquor” to “drunken enlisted men and citizens” alike. In 1881, Col. Grierson directed Millspaugh to evict female camp followers who were living at his establishment, which culminated in Millspaugh’s resignation as

post trader.8 Outside the immediate fort boundaries, which seemed to vary in size over the years, there

was little development south of the Concho River besides the post sutler store and saloon. But frontier forts, especially those that were supply centers like Fort Concho, lured settlers, developers and entrepreneurs. San Angelo began its life as a community known to soldiers as “Across the River,” which offered liquor, sex and gambling north of the fort. In 1870, a promoter named Bart DeWitt purchased 320 acres of land “Across the River” in hopes of developing a town he called “Santa Angela” in memory of his late wife.

As San Angelo grew and prospered north of the river, the need for a frontier military

outpost diminished. In March 1889, six months after the arrival of San Angelo’s first railroad north of downtown, the army abandoned Fort Concho. Post-Military Era and Development

The arrival of the Santa Fe Railroad in 1888 established San Angelo as a shipping and trade center and stimulated growth. Farmers settled nearby, and the local sheep and wool industry boomed. The San Angelo Sanborn Insurance map of 1900 includes drawings of the enlisted men’s barracks at Fort Concho, and they are labeled as “Wool Ware Houses at Old Fort

Concho,” an indication of early commercial development in the survey area.9

After resigning as Fort Concho’s post trader, J.L. Millspaugh turned his attention to other endeavors, including establishing San Angelo’s first ice factory and water system in 1884. The early waterworks system was first located on Concho Avenue, just west of Irving. By 1894, the city’s waterworks plant, with a capacity of 61,000 gallons, was located just south of the Phase II survey area at Avenue I and Burgess Street.10

Near that location, Millspaugh worked to construct Lone Wolf Dam along the South Concho River, which ensured water supply for the growing city. The dam was completed by 1902. In 1898, Millspaugh sold his water works and electric company to five men, who created the San Angelo Water and Light Co. Among them was C.A. Broome, who had been elected city

alderman in 1895. 11

14

Figure 3-5. Mexican American House Near

Old Fort Concho. Courtesy West Texas Collection,

Angelo State University.

Figure 3-4. Mexican American Family Living Under South Oakes Street Bridge.

Courtesy West Texas Archives, Angelo State University.

According to Arnoldo De Leon

in his book San Angelenos, Mexican

Americans in San Angelo, Texas, members of the Felix Flores family settled south of the North Concho River by the middle of the 1880s. De Leon wrote that, by 1900, Mexican American families lived along the North Concho River banks east to the Oaks Street bridge. The Tom Green County Historical Society collection in the West Texas Collectionat Angelo State University includes a photo of a family living under the Oakes Street bridge. The collection also includes a photo of a Mexican-American adobe house that is labeled as being near Fort Concho. None of these early houses remain in the survey area.

The Phase II survey area began to grow at the turn of the twentieth century, especially as a location for neighborhoods, perhaps because of the availability of water and power.

Millspaugh dabbled in real estate and the 1904 Sanborn Map shows the first streets and blocks platted south of the river, surrounding the area identified as “Old Fort Concho.” The area just west of the fort is labeled as the “Millspaugh Addition,” and may be located upon the seventy acres adjacent to the fort that he purchased in the 1870s. Today, the lots in that area are legally

described as part of the Fort Concho Addition.12

15

Figure 3-6. Kansas City, Mexico, and Orient Passenger Depot. Photo by Author.

In his book, Fort Concho and the Texas Frontier, J. Evetts Haley wrote of Millspaugh and his real estate venture: “When an interested passerby stopped to ask where ‘Millspaugh Addition’ could be found, his wife, with the saving grace of humor, made a sweeping gesture toward his eight children playing in the yard.”13

According to De Leon, in the early 1900s, several Mexican-American families lived in the newly platted area identified on the Sanborn Map as the Millspaugh Addition, along Hill and Irving Streets where they intersect with Avenues C and D and Washington Drive. Among them were families of San Angelo’s early Mexican settlers, including Flores, Giron, Losoya and Navarrette. In 1905, C.A. Broome formed The Fort Concho Realty Company and platted the Fort Concho Addition north of the site of the old fort. On the 1908 Sanborn Insurance Map, houses appear along Allen, Bird, and Webb Streets in the new neighborhood. These houses, many of which still stand today, are among the oldest buildings in the survey area, other than Fort Concho itself.

Along with Louis Lee Farr and several other businessmen, Broome purchased the buildings at the old fort from the government. Despite the fact that the 1904 Sanborn Map of San Angelo described the roofs and porches of the fort’s buildings as being in poor condition, families moved into the officers’ quarters, because they saw them as some of the finest houses in the community.

Kansas City, Mexico, and Orient Railroad

In 1908 to 1909, a new rail line arrived in San Angelo, running directly through the Phase II survey area south of the North Concho River. The Kansas City, Mexico, and Orient Railway was the brainchild of entrepreneur Arthur Stillwell, whose plans called for the rail line to run from Kansas City to the west coast of Mexico, where a sea voyage would connect to exotic Oriental destinations. The KCM&O built its freight station in 1909 and the line’s first train arrived in San Angelo in June. The next year, the KCM&O purchased land for its freight depot on Avenue D and Chadbourne Street from Juan Flores. The Richardsonian Romanesque passenger depot opened in 1910 and became the headquarters for the Texas section of the KCM&O.

The opening of the KCM&O Railway intensified the economic boom in San Angelo that began when the Santa Fe arrived during the late nineteenth century. In 1900, San Angelo’s population was 6,804. By 1910, the city was bursting out of its original boundaries with a

16

population of 10,321 residents.14 Development spread southward across the river into the Phase II Survey Area around old Fort Concho. Troy Steam Laundry opened on South Oakes Street

between 1908 and 1913, and the South Chadbourne viaduct was built in 1913.15 With the opening of this bridge, Chadbourne Street became a major commercial thoroughfare, leading from the KCM&O on the south side through downtown to the Santa Fe on the north side of the city.

Figure 3-7. Chadbourne Street Viaduct, Completed in 1913. Courtesy of

West Texas Archives, Angelo State University.

By 1908, S.L. Ogle opened a lumber mill on Allen Street and a concrete works opened on the corner of South Oakes and Allen, both to keep up with building in the Fort Concho Addition. Residents built houses on the old fort’s parade grounds, and families gathered at the baseball park on the southwest corner of Baker and Burgess Street. San Angelo established its public school system in 1903, and in 1907, the system built its “Southern Ward Public School” in the middle of the fort’s parade grounds for the children who lived in the growing south side neighborhoods. By 1920, five thousand rail cars of cattle were shipped through San Angelo each year. In 1923, the West Texas oil boom exploded when Santa Rita No. 1 gushed just 174 feet north of KCM&O tracks. Trains began rolling through San Angelo every hour carrying supplies, equipment and workers to oilfields. On return trips, the trains carried oil. Because of its close

17

proximity to the first oil wells, much of this oil field train traffic was on the KCM&O line that bisects the Phase II Survey Area.

The discovery of oil in the Permian Basin had a drastic impact on San Angelo, the closest city to the wells. The city boomed again during the 1920s, growing to a population of 25,000 within ten years.16

According to historian Gus Clemens, “Much of what San Angelo is today traces its roots

back to this period of growth during the 1920s. San Angelo was largely rebuilt during the eight years between 1925, from when oil money began coming in steadily, and 1933,

when the bottom fell out of both oil and agribusiness.”17 Mexican-American Neighborhood Flourishes

After 1910, many of the Mexican-American workers arriving in San Angelo to work on the railroad or in local agricultural enterprises – the cattle, sheep, or cotton businesses – settled south of the river in the neighborhood already established along Hill and Irving Streets from Avenue C south to Washington Drive. By 1920, this neighborhood expanded to an area bounded by Avenue D to the north, Randolph Street to the west, Chadbourne Street to the east and Highland Street to the south. This neighborhood became known as the Oriente Barrio to differentiate it from the Santa Fe Barrio north of downtown. By 1910, 33 percent of San Angelo’s Mexican American population lived south of the

North Concho River.18 As the Oriente Barrio grew, the city’s education system built a school for Mexican American students at 210 West Avenue A. Previous schools for Mexican Americans had been located in the northern areas of the city, so the school’s location is an indicator of the growth of the southern barrio. By 1916, the school had 50 students. Worley’s 1914 – 1915 Directory of San Angelo lists Miss Fannie Bates as the principal. The 1920 Sanborn Insurance Map of San Angelo includes a drawing of the small, rectangular, one-story building, which is labeled “Mexican School,” with notations that it had no lights and stove heat. The school system moved the Mexican American school during the 1920s and the school on Avenue A within the Phase II survey area is no longer standing.19

Local churches built schools for children of the Oriente Barrio, including a Presbyterian Mission School, opened in 1912 on the south side of Washington Drive just outside the Phase II Survey Area. In the mid-1920s, the Catholic Church built a school called San Pedro for

Mexican-American students at 320 West Avenue D. 20

As the city’s population grew through the teens and twenties, the Oriente Barrio spread south to Avenue N. This extended Mexican American neighborhood was called “Bulto Prieto,” or “Dark Figure.” Mexican Americans in San Angelo gathered each year to celebrate national feast days or “fiestas patrias,” including Cinco de Mayo and Diez y Seis de Septiembre. Cinco de Mayo, or the fifth of May, commemorates the anniversary of the defeat of the French in 1862 at Puebla, Mexico. Diez y Seis de Septiembre, or the sixteenth of September, celebrates the cry Father Hidalgo issued for Mexican Independence in 1810.

18

Depression, Flood of 1936, and the New Deal in San Angelo

The 1930s dawned in San Angelo with the building of new South Oakes Street Bridge across the North Concho River by Tom Green County. The Great Depression, an oil glut, and terribly drought gripped San Angelo, as it did the rest of Texas, during the 1930s. In 1936, when at last it rained, the Concho Rivers flooded once again, devastating downtown and neighborhoods both north and south of the river. Millions of dollars of property floated down the Concho, and fifteen hundred residents were left homeless. Affected residents of the Oriente Barrio took refuge at St. Mary’s Church and the Mexican Presbyterian Church on Washington Drive. The flood destroyed the city’s municipal swimming pool and damaged the city’s parks along the river. The city held a bond election in 1937 for funds to finance rebuilding the parks and constructing a new swimming pool, but voters defeated the bonds. When the federal government offered financial assistance and labor through the Works Progress Administration (WPA), voters approved the bonds. Located along the north side of Avenue A just south of the river, the Pueblo Revival-style Municipal Swimming Pool, designed by San Angelo architect John G. Becker, opened in April 1939. The City of San Angelo and the Works Progress Administration also joined together in 1939 to build the El Camino Girl Scout Service Center. This cut-stone building, designed by San Angelo architect Leonard Mauldin, is located west of the Municipal Swimming Pool along the north side of Avenue A. Both of these resources reflect the construction and planning activity of the New Deal’s Works Progress Administration and its influence upon Texas cities. Post-War Growth and Mid-20

th Century Oil Boom

The U.S. government opened a bombardier school in San Angelo in 1940, where pilots trained during Word War II. Like Fort Concho 80 years earlier, the mid-20th century military base spurred a population boom and economic uplift in the community. Today, Mathis Field, which is located southeast of the Phase II survey area, is known as Goodfellow Air Force Base. Beginning during World War II and the increased demand for oil, the nearby Permian Basin flowed with a second boom for the surrounding area that stretched into the 1950s. According to Oil Daily, “The ‘20s and ‘50s were the glory days. Discovery followed discovery, with giant fields found in a wide swath 250 moles wide and 300 miles long.”21

From 1940 to 1950, the population of San Angelo doubled to 52,094.22 Accommodations for this frenzied increase in residents continued well into the 1950s. Within the Phase II survey area, mid-century drive-in diners like McIntire’s at South Chadbourne Street and West Washington Drive became the gathering spot of a new generation of oilmen.

19

Figure 3-8. McIntire’s Drive-In, Built Along South Chadbourne Street in 1952.

Development and Challenges

Texas’ “drought of record” during the 1950s slowed down the frenzied growth somewhat, but by 1960, San Angelo had grown again to 58,815 residents who had their eyes fixed on future progress. That progress included the construction in 1966 of Rio Concho Manor, an affordable housing complex for senior citizens within the Phase II survey area. During the late 1950s, a group of retired officers from Goodfellow Air Force Base approached some city leaders, including Houston Harte and Colonel Robert Augustinus regarding a need for low-cost housing for seniors. This group formed the Rio Concho Trust, which built Rio Concho Manor just south of the Concho River, along a deep river bend. In 1972, the trust added an east wing to Rio Concho Manor, which provided a total of 226 low-cost apartments for senior citizens. Forty-eight of the apartments are subsidized through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

In 1970, there were 12,500 residents in the city with Spanish surnames and many of them struggled with poverty. In 1969, Tom Green County prepared a Community Action Report. In the report, San Angelo was divided into census tracts. The Phase II survey area makes up a portion of the report’s Census Tract 9, which extended from the North Concho River in the north to Avenue N in the south, and from Koenigheim Street in the west to the South Concho River in the east. In this tract, 68.3 percent of the residents had Spanish surnames. The 2,000 residents who lived within Census Tract 9 earned a median annual income of $3,218 and completed an average of eight years of school.23 The national poverty threshold in 1969 for a family of four

with two children was $3,715.24 Although the overall level of unemployment in San Angelo was

between 3.5 to 4.5 percent from 1960 to 1980, the residents of the Phase II survey area mostly worked as laborers; domestic workers; or as operatives like seamstresses, butchers, and

welders.25

20

Historic Preservation, Revitalization and Cultural Initiatives

During the final decades of the twentieth century, residents and city leaders worked

tirelessly on historic preservation, revitalization, and cultural and educational projects within the Phase II Survey Area. These projects are described in detail in Chapter 2 of this report, “Historic Preservation and Cultural Renaissance in the Phase II Survey Area.”

21

Chapter 4 Survey Methodology

Members of the City of San Angelo Historic Preservation Commission, staff members in

the Planning Department, and a preservation consultant worked together on the following methodology to conduct and complete the Phase II Survey of Historic Resources south of the North Concho River in San Angelo.

Researched Historic Context of Area to be Surveyed

Before surveying began, the city staff, members of the Historic Preservation Commission

and the project professional researched the history of the area to be surveyed and developed the historic contexts included in the previous section. In order to develop this context, they examined the 1984 survey of resources, established agreed-upon important historic periods in San Angelo history, and identified cultural influences. Established Criteria Used for Identification of Significant Resources

The members of the Historic Preservation Commission, city staff and preservation consultant targeted all built resources within the survey area constructed up to 1965 for surveying. As recommended by the National Park Service, the project team decided to use criteria for listing resources in the National Register of Historic Places as a basis for the evaluation of surveyed properties.

National Register Criteria for Evaluation

The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology,

engineering, and culture is present in districts sites, buildings, structures and

objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials workmanship,

feeling, and association, and:

A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to

the broad patterns of our history; or

B. That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or

C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of

construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high

artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose

components may lack individual distinction; or

D. That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in

prehistory or history.26

In addition to National Register criteria, the project team also used the Criteria for Designation of San Angelo Historic Landmarks, which are specified in Section 211 of the City of San Angelo Zoning Ordinance, when evaluating resources.

22

Criteria for Designation of Historic Landmarks

An historic landmark may be designated through application of the Historic Overlay

Zone if it:

1. possesses significance in history, architecture, archeology, or culture;

2. is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad

patterns of local, regional, state, or national history;

3. is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past;

4. embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction;

5. represents the work of a master designer, builder, or craftsman;

6. represents an established and familiar visual feature of the city;

7. possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity

whose components may lack individual distinction; or

8. has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or

history.27

The survey project team also decided to use the National Register definition of integrity

when evaluating properties: Integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance.28

The seven aspects of integrity are included on the Texas survey forms: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. The project team used these National Register explanations when evaluating each aspect of integrity for a resource.

Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the

place where the historic event occurred.

Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space,

structure and style of a property.

Setting is the physical environment of a historic property.

Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited

during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to

form a historic property.

Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture

or people during any given period in history or prehistory.

Feeling is a property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a

particular period of time.

Association is the direct link between an important historic event or

person and a historic property.29

Conducted Fieldwork

Because of the number of resources within the resource area, volunteers conducted much of the survey fieldwork during the fall and winter of 2010 – 2011. About 34 volunteers were involved, bringing a diverse community perspective to the project. Most of the volunteers were students in Dr. Jason Pierce’s Public History class at Angelo State University.

23

Volunteers completed a Texas Historical Commission Historic Resources Survey Form for each resource built through 1965 in the survey area, and took at least one digital photograph of each resource. The City of San Angelo Planning Department staff members coordinated the volunteer fieldwork. City staff and the preservation consultant developed a training program for the volunteers before fieldwork began. The program briefly reviewed San Angelo history, major historic contexts, and local architectural styles and types that volunteers would encounter in the field. City staff members and the preservation consultant conducted three different training sessions. Evaluated Historic Resources

Using national and local criteria mentioned above, the commission members, city staff and preservation consultant established preservation priority designations. These designations consider each resource’s architectural attributes, historic and cultural context(s) associations, and integrity.

Preservation Priorities

High—These are the most significant resources in the survey area and they

contribute to local history or broader historical patterns and possess strong

association with (a) historic context(s). High priority properties are outstanding

or unique examples of architecture, engineering or crafted design. These

properties retain a high degree of architectural or physical integrity, having few

alterations, or can be easily returned to their original character. High priority

properties may meet one or more criteria for listing in the National Register of

Historic Places; they are likely to qualify to be designated as Recorded Texas

Historic Landmarks and City of San Angelo Historic Landmarks. Medium—These properties contribute significantly to local history or broader

historical patterns and possess some association with (a) historic context(s).

Medium priority properties are significant or typical examples of architecture,

engineering or crafted design or are outstanding examples of common local

building forms, styles or types. However, many medium priority properties have

often been altered and do not always exhibit a high level of integrity. These

buildings less often meet the criteria to be listed individually in the National

Register of Historic Places, but may be included as contributing to a district or

multiple property nomination. Medium priority buildings may qualify to be

designated as City of San Angelo Historic Landmarks, and could possibly receive

designation as a Texas historic subject.

Low—These properties have no association or unidentified association with

history or historic context(s). They typify common local building forms,

architectural styles or types, and have been moderately to severely altered, losing

their original character and architectural integrity. These resources usually do

24

not meet National Register criteria or criteria to be designated as Recorded Texas

Historic Landmarks.

It is important to note that these priority classifications are not qualitative judgments about resources’ relative importance to the City of San Angelo; they are made for evaluation and preservation planning purposes only. Entire neighborhoods or collections of associated resources, like sheep industry-related buildings, often contribute more of a “sense of place” to the community as an entire group, even though their individual components may have received “medium” priority classifications. Therefore, careful consideration should be given when using this priority system for preservation decision-making.

The project professional reviewed each survey form and accompanying digital

photographs submitted by volunteers, evaluating each property for its significance and integrity. She assigned each resource a priority classification, and noted any associated historic contexts. The project professional also assessed whether each resource appears to potentially contribute to a historic district nomination or multiple resource nomination to the National Register of Historic Places, or appears to be potentially eligible individually under one of the National Register criterion. The city also requested that the consultant identify high priority resources that appear to be endangered and neglected. The consultant then took black-and-white photographs and color slides of each high priority resource.

Using the information documented on survey forms, the consultant prepared an inventory

spreadsheet database that includes specific information on each of the properties surveyed. This inventory is Appendix A of this report, and a compact disc containing the database is also included. The digital photographs are saved by the address of the property surveyed.

Black-and-white photograph numbers and color slide numbers for high priority properties

are recorded on photo index sheets included in Appendix B. Individual survey forms for high-priority properties are also included in Appendix B. A map showing the locations of all resources surveyed and all high priority resources is Appendix C. Fort Concho Historic Landmark

The project professional, along with Barbara Hesse, the city’s historic preservation officer, completed an individual survey form for each built resource within Fort Concho Historic Landmark and took digital photos of each building in December 2010. Fort Concho Director Robert Bluthardt compiled an “Update on Buildings and Grounds of Fort Concho Since 1980 Master Plan for Development,” and that update is attached to this report as Appendix D.

25

Chapter 5 Observations

Built Resources

This survey utilized the definitions of built resources developed by the National Park Service for the National Register of Historic Places. Buildings are “created principally to shelter any form of human activity,” and include houses, churches, offices or hotels. Structures are “functional constructions made usually for purposes other than creating human shelter,” and include bandstands, fences and bridges. Objects are “primarily artistic in nature or are relatively small in scale and simply constructed.” Fountains, monuments, sculptures and statuary are examples of objects.30

The Phase II survey area south of the Concho River contains a diverse collection of built resources. Nineteenth-century frontier fort buildings, small frame houses in the old Oriente Barrio, commercial buildings lining South Irving, South Chadbourne, and South Oakes Streets, and industrial facilities and warehouses clustered near the Kansas City, Mexico, and Orient Railroad stations all reflect San Angelo’s rich heritage.

Districts Within the Phase II Survey Area

There are five distinct geographic districts within the Phase II Survey area south of the

Concho River:

1. Fort Concho National Historic Landmark;

2. Fort Concho Addition neighborhood north of the fort;

3. Commercial/industrial area along South Oakes, South Chadbourne, and South Irving

Streets, which surrounds the Kansas City, Mexico and Orient Railroad lines and stations;

4. Oriente Barrio west of South Irving Street and south of West Avenue A; and

5. Cultural and social community buildings constructed along the south banks of the North

Concho River.

Development around Fort Concho began after the turn of the twentieth century. This

development was probably spurred by availability of water and power (see Chapter 4) and

advances in two different modes of transportation: railroads and motor vehicles.

The building of San Angelo’s second railroad, the Kansas City, Mexico, and Orient, in 1909 and

the establishment of the company’s Texas headquarters in its new passenger depot touched off a

flurry of activity and building within the survey area. Plans began for the railroad as early as

1905.

Sanborn Maps of 1894 showed one bridge across the North Concho River between old

Fort Concho and San Angelo, located along South Oakes Street. By 1908, Sanborn Maps

identified the South Oakes Street Bridge as a steel structure with a wood floor, and another

bridge is illustrated across the river along South Abe Street. The opening of the new Chadbourne

Street Viaduct in 1913 improved access south of the river to new motor vehicle traffic. This

26

bridge established Chadbourne Street as a major commercial thoroughfare through the city, both

north and south of the Concho River.

Fort Concho Addition

The first houses and businesses in the Phase II Area are shown on the 1908 Sanborn Map

in a small area bounded by South Oakes Street on the west, Bird Street on the south, Webb Street

to the east, and Allen Street to the north. Three years earlier, real estate entrepreneur C.A.

Broome organized the Fort Concho Realty Company with Louis Farr and platted the Fort

Concho Addition. Builders probably used lumber from the Gem Lumber Company on South

Oakes that S.L. Ogle planed at his Planing Mill on Allen Street.

Figure 5-1. Earliest Neighborhood Mapped South of North Concho by Sanborn Map Company

(1908), which is now known as Fort Concho Addition.

Many of these houses remain in

the Fort Concho Addition today,

including 16 high priority houses in this

early five-block area. Among these

houses are charming vernacular

examples of late Queen Anne,

Craftsman, and Prairie architecture.

Besides architecture, this early

neighborhood in the shadow of Fort

Concho still includes unpaved

alleyways bisecting each block behind

the houses. The neighborhood featured

the Concho Ball Park located on Block

62 along Baker Street from the early

1900s to after 1931.

Figure 5-2. Old Photo of 134 Allen Street in the Fort

Concho Addition, Date Unknown. Courtesy Norma

Gilman

27

This small neighborhood just

south of the North Concho River grew to

include blocks along Rust Street to the

east and south all the way to encompass

the grounds of old Fort Concho, where

developers platted streets and residents

built several houses. Today, only one of

the houses remains immediately adjacent

to the fort, a low-priority Craftsman-style

bungalow at 114 E. Washington Drive.

Commercial/Industrial Area

With the opening of the Kansas City, Mexico, and Orient Railroad and the building of

new bridges across the North Concho, businesses and industries popped up along the three major

thoroughfares that run north and south through the Phase II survey area: South Irving Street,

South Chadbourne Street, and South Oakes Street.

The earliest businesses include a row of

storefronts from 508 through 522 South Chadbourne,

which were built between 1909 and 1927. Documented

during the 1985 survey of historic resources, all of these

buildings are San Angelo Landmarks and within the Old

Town Historic District. Since 1985, fire destroyed the

interior of the two-story brick commercial building at

516-522 South Chadbourne, and the building is open

and exposed to natural elements. The Bledsoe family

built Troy Laundry just south of the Oakes Street Bridge

by 1913. They replaced their first building with a 1920s

tile building that still stands today with remarkable

Moderne-style signage intact.

Hotels and apartment buildings sprung up around

the railroad stations, followed later by tourist courts

along South Irving Street. Today, the Prairie-style

building at 621 South Irving, which was probably built

before 1920 as the Park Hotel, is still a multi-family

facility.

Railroad spurs bisected many of the blocks in the survey area, some running right up to

warehouse buildings. Sparked by the 1920s oil boom, business owners built warehouses and

factories. The industrial building at 803 South Chadbourne, built between 1931 and 1949, was a

beer warehouse. Banner Creamery built large factory and warehouse along South Oakes Street

during the same time period.

Figure 5-3. 134 Allen Street today.

Figure 5-4. Troy Laundry’s 1920s-era signage.

28

Figure 5-6. Jack Kelly’s Drive-In in 1948.

Figure 5-5. Banner Creamery Factory and Warehouse, built between 1931 and 1949.

In 1908, Sanborn Maps show that the barracks buildings at old Fort Concho were storing

wool as warehouses. As the wool industry grew in San Angelo, processors built several wool

warehouses near the fort from the 1920s through the 1940s. Along East Avenue A and Rust

Street stands the Joe B. Blakeney Wool Warehouse. Three warehouses remain from a full block

owned by the Santa Rita Wool Company along Rust Street behind Fort Concho’s Headquarters.

The Wool Growers Central Storage Company built a large warehouse along East Avenue B,

incorporating Fort Concho’s original stables. Built of brick-faced tile and iron posts, the Texas Stockmen Supply Company, now owned by the City of San Angelo at 134 Henry O. Flipper, ground and mixed food for livestock.

The Phase II Survey Area features several interesting examples of Moderne-style

buildings and Post-War Modern architecture. With the opening of new bridges and growing

popularity of automobiles, businesses catered to motorized travel rather than rail transportation.

Shipping by freight was accommodated at the Moderne-style Motor Freight Station built

between 1931 and 1949 at 417 East Avenue D. Built with a concrete frame, the station is large,

with more than 31,000 square feet.

Increased

auto travel by

families and the

development of mid-

twentieth century

drive-in culture

resulted in two

unique diners in the

29

Figure 5-6. 119 West Avenue B, a Craftsman-style Bungalow built before 1920.

Figure 5-7. 221 West Avenue B, a Folk Victorian house built circa 1905.

survey area, where carhops catered curb service, or diners relaxed in vinyl booths. Jerry Kelly

served his famous “Chicken in the Rough,” beginning in 1948, at his drive-in at 502 South

Chadbourne, which still has its distinctive triple gables and large, fixed oval windows. W.W.

“Mac” McIntire opened his drive-in at 811 South Chadbourne in September 1952. The building

still features its sleek curves, glass block windows, and its outdoor car canopy and unique

freestanding neon sign.

Oriente Barrio

Development of this Mexican-

American neighborhood accelerated with

the building of the railroad in the Phase II

Survey area. Mexican-Americans were

among the earliest settlers in San Angelo,

and they have imprinted their rich culture

on the built environment south of the

North Concho River. For the purposes of

this report, this Mexican-American

neighborhood extends from Avenue A

south to West Washington Drive (the

southern boundary of the survey area),

and west from the west side of South

Irving Street to the east side of South

Koenigheim Street (the western boundary

of the survey area).

There are 113 buildings

remaining in these 12 blocks, and most

of them are houses or duplexes. There

are 17 high priority houses within the

Oriente Barrio, and they represent

vernacular examples of Craftsman

bungalows, Queen Anne-style houses,

Mission Revival and Spanish Eclectic

architecture, along with folk forms like

hall-and-parlor and shotgun houses.

Valuable resources in the barrio

that are no longer standing include the

early- twentieth-century Mexican

school, which stood along the north

side of East Avenue A, west of South

Hill Street and east of Randolph Street in Block 47. During the 1920s, area Catholics built the

30

Immaculate Conception Academy, also known as St. Peter’s School, along the north side of

West Avenue D west of South Randolph Street and east of South Koenigheim. It was gone by

1949. An adobe “Mexican Dance Hall” stood along the north side of West Washington Drive,

just west of South Randolph Street, during the 1920s and 1930s. By 1949, it had become a

furniture store.

Cultural and Social Community Buildings

There are two buildings constructed by the Work Projects Administration (WPA) during

the 1930s as part of the New Deal. Both the Girl Scout Headquarters, at 304 West Avenue A,

and the San Angelo Municipal Pool, at 22 East Avenue A, are located just south of the North

Concho River and just north of Avenue A.

They are joined along the southern banks of the river by more contemporary projects,

including the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts. The museum restored five historic buildings

along the west side of South Oakes Street that are just east of the museum itself in Block 50.

Along the east side of South Orient Street, just south of the museum, Historic San Angelo, Inc.,

and Old Town Conservancy, Inc. moved five significant, endangered historic buildings and

restored them for future generations. The non-profit organizations, in partnership with the city,

moved and restored these buildings between 1995 and 2005.

Some of these buildings along the river also represent the only known work of

professional architects within the Phase II Survey Area. John G. Becker of San Angelo designed

the Pueblo Revival Municipal Swimming Pool and local architect Leonard Mauldin designed the Girl Scout Headquarters. Two of the historic buildings in Old Town, the Baker Building and the Zenker House, reflect the work of early San Angelo architect Oscar Ruffini.

31

Chapter 6 Results and Recommendations

During the course of the Phase II Survey, volunteers and professionals documented and evaluated 282 historic resources. Most of these resources were buildings, with the majority, approximately 160, built for domestic purposes. Most were houses with some small apartment houses and a few duplexes. One is a large 10-story retirement center built during the 1960s.

Seventy-one of the buildings were built for commercial purposes and six for industrial purposes. Another seven were built as warehouses. Nine were built for public uses, such as governing, worshipping, or social gathering, or cultural and educational pursuits. These include the Municipal Swimming Pool, Girl Scout Headquarters, a Boy Scout hut, and one church. The survey included three non-building resources, including Rio Concho Park and two bridges. Several mid-20th century modern buildings still feature interesting neon signs, both freestanding and mounted on buildings. Approximately 99 of the built resources surveyed were built between 1931and 1965, and therefore documented for the first time. High Priority Properties

After evaluating the surveyed resources using criteria described in the Survey

Methodology section, the project professional, city staff and members of the Historic Preservation Commission identified 98 high priority properties. Table 4 is a listing of all the identified high priority properties. These include significant properties already listed in the National Register of Historic Places, such as the Kansas City, Mexico and Orient Passenger Station and Freight Station. There is also quite a bit of undeveloped land in the Phase II Survey Area, including all of Block 13, which is bounded by South Oakes Street to the east, East Washington Drive to the south, East Avenue D to the north and Orient Street to the west. This is an important block of property, because it is directly across South Oakes Street from Fort Concho Historic Landmark. Prime property along the south side of the North Concho River remains undeveloped, including all of Block 47 on the north side of West Avenue A, where the Mexican School was once located. South Randolph Street is to the west of Block 47 and Hill Street to the east. Much of Block 49, which is north of West Avenue A, also remains undeveloped. South Chadbourne Street bounds Block 49 to the east and South Irving Street is to its west. Several of the River Lots within the Fort Concho Addition, north of Allen Street and south of the Concho River, also remain developed.

32

Res

ou

rce

No

.

Ad

dre

ss

No

. Street Resource Name Resource Type

NR

RT

HL

SA

La

nd

ma

rk

SA

Dis

tric

t

1 304 W. Avenue A

Girl Scouts Little

House Educational Building x x

2 301 W. Avenue A House

7 302 W. Avenue B House

9 329 W. Avenue B House

11 319 W. Avenue B House

13 315 W. Avenue B House

15 303 W. Avenue B House

24 319 W. Avenue C House

25 317 W. Avenue C House

50 225 W. Avenue D House

58 230 W. Avenue C House

68 215 W. Avenue B House

69 217 W. Avenue B House

71 221 W. Avenue B House

84 227 W. Avenue A House

96

106-

108 W. Avenue B House/ Duplex

97

102-

104 W. Avenue B House/ Duplex

98 115 W. Avenue B House

99 119 W. Avenue B House

101 127 W. Avenue B House

105 621 S. Irving House,Multi-family apartments

106 701 S. Irving

Southwest

Airgas,

Inc./Welding

Supply

Commercial building with Art Deco

Neon Sign, “Welding Supply”

107 125 W. Avenue C House

119 811 S. Chadbourne Commercial building

121 805 S. Chadbourne Commercial building

122 703 S. Chadbourne

San Angelo

Railway Museum Railroad Depot x x

33

Res

ou

rce

No

.

Ad

dre

ss

No

. Street Resource Name Resource Type

NR

RT

HL

SA

La

nd

ma

rk

SA

Dis

tric

t

127 609 S. Chadbourne Commercial building

130 606 S. Irving

Gunter Wholesale Commercial building

134 434 S. Irving

The

Registry/Griffin

Interiors Commercial building

136 22 E. Avenue A

Municipal

Swimming Pool Park/Entertainment venue x x x

138 502 S. Chadbourne Restaurant x

139 506 S. Chadbourne Commercial building x

140 508 S. Chadbourne Commercial building x x

141 510 S. Chadbourne Commercial building x x

142 512 S. Chadbourne Commercial building x x

143

516-

522 S. Chadbourne Two block Commercial building x x

147 618 S. Chadbourne 618 Station Commercial building

148 702 S. Chadbourne

Senior Citizens

Center/ Santa Fe

Crossing Railroad Freight Depot x x

160 602 S. Orient Baker Building Commercial building x

161 528 S. Orient Hartgrove House Frame House x

162 520 S. Orient

Camunez

Grocery Commercial building x

163 512 S. Orient Zenker House Frame House x

164 502 S. Orient Bunk House Frame Houe x

166 455 S. Oakes Banner Creamery Industrial building x

167 433 S. Oakes Service Station x

172

S. Oakes

Bridge Bridge

173 350 S. Oakes Troy Laundry Commercial building

175 134 Allen House

176 138 Allen House

177 140 Allen House x x

179 Rio Concho Rio Concho Park

9-acre park along south side of river

and north side of Rio Concho Drive

34

Res

ou

rce

No

.

Ad

dre

ss

No

. Street Resource Name Resource Type

NR

RT

HL

SA

La

nd

ma

rk

SA

Dis

tric

t

180 403 Rio Concho

Rio Concho

Manor 10-story retirement center

181 401 Allen House

187 317 Allen House

188 311 Allen House

193 219 Bird House

194 217 Bird House

195 215 Bird House

199 206 Bird House

201 220 Bird House

203 228 Bird House

205 223 Allen House

206 221 Allen House

208 203 Allen House

212 123 Allen House

217 120 Bird House

219 132 Bird House

222 325 Rust House

231 410 Baker House

248 417 E. Avenue D

Large Commercial/ Industrial

building (Motor Frieght Station)

251 134

Henry O.

Flipper Two-lot commercial building

120A 803 S. Chadbourne

Commercial building–old service

station

145A 22 E. Avenue B Commercial building x

198A 200 Bird House

145B 22 E. Avenue B

Brick warehouse with metal

addition built on front or south

elevation x

254 –

275 630 S. Oakes

Fort Concho

National Historic

Landmark

21 buildings, most constructed by

US Military 1868 – 1870s x x x x

85 122

W. Avenue A Mayfield Paper Industrial/Commercial

171 417 S. Oakes Commercial Building x

Table 6-1. High Priority Properties in the Phase II Survey Area.

35

Endangered High-Priority Properties

The project professional, city staff and members of the city’s Historic Preservation Commission have also identified 21 high priority properties that they have deemed to be endangered. Table 5-2 is a listing of the endangered high priority properties. Many of these properties are endangered through neglect and are vacant and unused. Endangered high-priority historic properties in the survey area include the 1950s Moderne McIntire’s Drive-In at 811 South Chadbourne, Banner Creamery’s factory and warehouse at 455 South Oakes, and the Moderne Motor Freight Station at 417 East Avenue D.

Res

ou

rce

No

.

Ad

dre

ss

No

.

Street Resource Name Resource Type

Endangered

Neglect Damage

9 329 W. Avenue B House x

15 303 W. Avenue B House x

25 317 W. Avenue C House x

50 225 W. Avenue D House x

71 221 W. Avenue B House x

107 125 W. Avenue C House x x

119 811 S. Chadbourne

Commercial

building

x

127 609 S. Chadbourne

Commercial

building

x

143

516-522 S. Chadbourne

Two block Commercial

building

x x

166 455 S. Oakes Banner Creamery

Industrial

building

x

173 350 S. Oakes Troy Laundry

Industrial

building

x

181 401 Allen House x

193 219 Bird House x

194 217 Bird House x

201 220 Bird House x

205 223 Allen House x

219 132 Bird House x

248 417 E. Avenue D

Industrial

building (Motor

Frieght Station)

x

275 507 Avenue D Fort Concho Bakery

19th century

military fort

building

x

120A 803 S. Chadbourne

Old service

station

x

198A 200 Bird House x

Table 6-2. Endangered High Priority Properties in Phase II Survey Area.

36

It is recommended that members of San Angelo’s Historic Preservation Commission, in partnership with members of local non-profit preservation organizations, such as Historic San Angelo, Inc., develop and promote educational programs regarding existing Federal and local tax incentives associated with designation and rehabilitation of significant historic properties.

Several historic properties within the Phase II survey area have been remodeled or

updated with inappropriate materials or additions. As a result, some of these were classified as medium or low priorities due to exterior modifications. Preservation educational programs could include sessions on appropriate rehabilitation techniques and materials, which could help restore these buildings as contributing significant historic resources. Members of the Historic Preservation Commission and local non-profit preservation organizations could work together to develop additional creative incentive programs to save endangered high-priority properties within the Phase II Survey Area. Changes since 1984 –1985 Survey

Just 35 resources in the Phase II Survey area were surveyed in 1984 and 1985 by students at the Center for the History of Engineering and Technology at Texas Tech University. Since that time, there have been a few changes in the survey area. At Fort Concho, the Fort Concho school, built in the early 20th century, was torn down and relocated to open the fort’s original parade grounds. This project was recommended in the fort’s master plan for development in 1980. Enlisted Mens Barracks 1 and 2 were reclaimed from the Monarch Tile factory, and the remaining buildings there were covered in a contemporary stucco façade. This building is now non-contributing to possible historic districts in the survey area. The fort’s original stables were reclaimed from the warehouse facility of the Wool Growers Central Storage Company along Henry O. Flipper Street. The facades of the two brick warehouses on either side of the stables have been covered in new exteriors. These warehouses were built between 1920 and 1927, and would be high priority resources if they did not have new facades. In the Fort Concho Addition, a small Craftsman-style bungalow surveyed at 224 Allen Street is no longer there. At 405 Baker Street, a 1909 late Queen Anne-style house has been covered with contemporary siding and its front window has been altered in size and replaced. This building would have been a high-priority resource, but because of these alterations to its original exterior appearance, it is a medium priority. National, State and Local Designations

Five of the high-priority historic resources listed in Table 5-1 are already listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Most of the buildings listed in Table 5-1 as high priority properties appear to be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, with the exception of the historic properties that have been relocated to Old Town.

37

Rather than list each high-priority resource individually, this report recommends the nomination of four districts containing these resources, based on the distinct geographic areas described in Chapter 4, Observations. This report also recommends one multi-property nomination to the National Register for resources related to San Angelo’s wool industry. Applications should be prepared to designate these geographic districts and muli-property groups as San Angelo Historic Districts. Nomination of these properties to the National Register of Historic Places could help encourage rehabilitation and reuse through Federal tax credit programs. Nomination as San Angelo Historic Districts could also help encourage rehabilitation and reuse through the city’s existing historic preservation tax incentives. A property owner may request up to a 50 percent

real property tax abatement of city taxes to restore and rehabilitate locally zoned historic

property (see Chapter 2).

Individual Designations The Girl Scout Headquarters, “Girl Scout Little House,” at 302 West Avenue A, is the one historic resource that does not readily fit into one of the four recommended National Register and San Angelo Historic Districts below. A nomination for the National Register should be prepared for this building, which is designated as a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark. This building is also designated and zoned as a San Angelo Historic Landmark. Just three of the high-priority resources listed in Table 5-1 are designated as Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks. Most of the buildings listed in Table 5-1 appear to be eligible for designation as Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks, with the exception of the historic properties that have been relocated to Old Town. Individual applications should be prepared for each of the buildings to be designated as Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks. Recommended National Register and San Angelo Historic Districts This report recommends that nominations for listing in the National Register of Historic Places as districts and nominations for designation as San Angelo Historic Districts be prepared for the following areas within the Phase II Survey Area.

1. Fort Concho Addition This neighborhood district, where building began as early as 1905 to 1908, extends east from South Oakes Street to Rust Street. From the River Lots along the north side of Allen Street, the district extends south to the south side of Bird Street and southeast to the south side of Baker Street. This neighborhood appears to meet, on a local level of significance, Criterion A, event, in the area of Community Planning and Development, and Criterion C, architecture and

38

engineering, for its early 20th century examples of Craftsman, Queen Anne and folk architecture. 2. Oriente Barrio From the south side of East Avenue A, this neighborhood extends south to the north side of West Washington Drive (the southern boundary of the survey area). From the west side of South Koenigheim (the western boundary of the survey area), the neighborhood extends east to the west side of South Irving Street. This neighborhood appears to meet, on a local level of significance, Criterion A, event, in the areas of Community Planning and Development and Ethnic Heritage, Hispanic, and Criterion C, architecture and engineering, for its early 20th century examples of Craftsman, Queen Anne and folk architecture. 3. Southside Commercial District This recommended historic district extends from the south side of the North Concho River south to West Washington Drive (the southern boundary of the survey area). From the west side of South Irving Street it extends east to the east side of South Oakes. This district would encompass all of the commercial and industrial resources that are clustered around these three major thoroughfares and the railroad tracks. This commercial district appears to meet, on a local level of significance, Criterion A, event, in the areas of Community Planning and Development, Commerce, and Industry, and Criterion C, architecture and engineering for examples of early 20th century commercial architecture as well as mid-20th century modern architecture. 4. Rio Concho Historic District Within three years, Rio Concho Manor’s original building to the west will 50 years old. This recommended district includes the manor’s original 10-story building and Rio Concho Park, the 9-acre park along south side of river and north side of Rio Concho Drive. Rio Concho Manor donated this 9-acre parcel of land to the city, which created the park in 1967. This small district appears to meet, on a local level of significance, Criterion A, event, in the areas of Community Planning and Development, and Criterion C, for architecture and engineering for the manor’s mid-20th century modern design. It may also qualify, on a statewide level of significance, for Criterion B, affiliation with significant persons, for its association with newspaper publisher and media entrepreneur Houston Harte.

39

Figure 6-1. Map showing Areas of Four Proposed New Historic Districts. Existing Historic

Districts are Also Shown.

Multiple-Property Nominations

This report recommends that multiple-property nominations for listing in the National

Register of Historic Places and nominations for designation as San Angelo Historic Landmarks

40

be prepared for the group of buildings within the Phase II Survey Area that are associated with the wool and mohair industry in San Angelo.

According to The Handbook of Texas, “San Angelo is the largest processing and shipping

center for the wool and mohair industry in the United States.”31 This industry began in San Angelo when the first sheep were brought to the county during the 1870s, and it has shaped the community since that time.

This same recommendation was made in 2006 in the Phase I Survey Report. The

buildings related to the wool and mohair industry in the Phase II Survey area could be grouped together with those in the Phase I area in one multiple property National Register nomination and a San Angelo Landmarks nomination. This multiple property group of buildings appears to meet, on a local level of significance, Criterion A for agriculture and industry, and some of them appear to meet Criterion C, architecture and engineering, on a local level of significance.

Phase II historic resources that should be included in this group are:

1. Three remaining Santa Rita Wool Company warehouses on the west side of Rust Street, 2. Joe B. Blakeney Wool Warehouse on East Avenue A, 3. Wool Growers Central Storage Company Warehouses built on either side of the Fort

Concho Stables along Henry O. Flipper Street, 4. Texas Stockmen Supply Company building at 134 Henry O. Flipper Street, now owned

by the City of San Angelo, and 5. Moderne-style Motor Freight Station on East Avenue D.

Recommendation for Fort Concho National Historic Landmark

Many positive changes have occurred at Fort Concho National Historic Landmark since Bell Klein & Hoffman prepared the fort’s Master Plan for Redevelopment in 1980. All of these changes have had the cumulative effect of restoring Fort Concho to its late 19th century authenticity. One important recommendation made by the Master Plan for Redevelopment has not been completed, and that is the closing of East Avenue D to through traffic, and the removal of the modern paved street.

This report concurs with the recommendation made in the 1980 Fort Concho Master Plan that East Avenue D should be closed to through traffic and the modern street should be removed from the fort. There are three other routes that can be used from South Oakes Street to enter the neighborhood east of Fort Concho, including traveling east on Allen Street to Rust Street, traveling east on East Washington Drive to Rust Street, and traveling east along East Highland Boulevard. Removing East Avenue D from Fort Concho would fully restore the parade grounds in the fort from the row of officers’ quarters to the enlisted men’s barracks.

41

Chapter 7 High Priority Properties

Not Previously Documented

The 36 high-priority resources described in this chapter were not documented during the 1978 or 1984 San Angelo surveys. They are not listed in the National Register or designated as historic by the state or city. They are not included in an existing San Angelo Historic District. Following are brief histories, descriptions, and evaluations of these previously undocumented resources.

9. House at 329 W. Avenue B

This Craftsman-style bungalow was built between 1920 and 1927, according to Sanborn Insurance Maps. The appraisal district web site lists the construction date as 1923. With its intact Craftsman features like brackets, three-over-one wood windows and tapered box supports on brick piers, this house may qualify for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Oriente Barrio historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of ethnic heritage and community development. This house is endangered.

24. House at 319 W. Avenue C

This Craftsman-style bungalow was built between 1927 and 1931, according to Sanborn Insurance Maps. The appraisal district web site lists the construction date as 1927. With its intact Craftsman features like front porch tapered box supports on brick piers, this house may qualify for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Oriente Barrio historic district, and would contribute to that district for local

significance in the areas of ethnic heritage and community development.

42

25. House at 317 W. Avenue C

This Craftsman-style bungalow was built between 1920 and 1927, according to Sanborn Insurance Maps. With its intact Craftsman features like exposed rafter tails, three-over-one wood windows and front porch tapered box supports on brick piers, this house may qualify for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Oriente Barrio historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of ethnic heritage and community development. The detached garage located to the southwest of this house is original, and a narrow, paved two-lane ribbon drive leads to the garage.

68. House at 215 W. Avenue B

Built circa 1910, this Craftsman-style bungalow is one of the oldest houses in its neighborhood, which is south of the Concho River, west of South Irving Street, east of South Koenigheim Street and north of West Washington Drive. With its intact Craftsman features like brackets, diamond-pane wood windows and exposed rafter tails, this house may qualify for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually for local architectural significance. It

is within the recommended Oriente Barrio historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of ethnic heritage and community development. This house is endangered by neglect. 81. House at 207 – 209 W. Avenue A

This Spanish Eclectic-style house was built between 1927 and 1931. It is shown on the 1931 San Angelo Sanborn Map along with its original detached garage. The house and garage still feature their original brick-veneer construction, and the house was originally built as a duplex. It is now designated as a single-family residence. With its Spanish architectural influence and original design, the house may qualify for listing in the National Register for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Oriente Barrio historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of ethnic heritage and community development.

43

85. Commercial Building at 122 W. Avenue A

(middle building)

This Art Deco-style commercial building, located in the center of a three building block, was constructed between 1927 and 1931 as an Auto Top and Body Shop with electric power and spray painting. It is built of brick-faced tile with tile curtain walls and steel trusses. By 1949, this building became a Venetian Blind factory. With its original brick-faced tile construction intact, this building may qualify for

individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. Although it is not located within the recommended Southside Commercial historic district, it could contribute to that district as a non-contiguous resource for local significance in the areas of community planning and development, commerce, and industry.

96. Duplex at 106 – 108 W. Avenue B

This Craftsman-style bungalow was built

between 1927 and 1931, according to Sanborn Insurance Maps. With its intact Craftsman features like double clipped gables, exposed rafter tails, and tapered box supports on brick piers, this house may qualify for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually for local architectural significance. However, its new vinyl siding placed over the original wood, and new windows may affect its individual architectural significance.It is within the recommended Oriente Barrio

historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of ethnic heritage and community development.

97. Duplex at 102 – 104 W. Avenue B

This Craftsman-style bungalow was built

between 1927 and 1931, according to Sanborn Insurance Maps. With its intact Craftsman features like double clipped gables, exposed rafter tails, and tapered box supports on brick piers, this house may qualify for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually for local architectural significance. However, its new vinyl siding placed over the original wood, and new windows may affect its individual architectural significance. It is within the recommended Oriente Barrio historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of ethnic heritage and community development.

44

101. House at 127 W. Avenue B

This Tudor Revival-style house was

built between 1927 and 1931. With its

Tudor Revival features like arches, gables,

and exterior chimney, this house may

qualify for listing in the National Register

of Historic Places individually for local

architectural significance. Its brick veneer

exterior and detached garage are original

features. It is within the recommended

Oriente Barrio historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of ethnic heritage and community development.

106. Commercial Building at 701 S. Irving St.

This Art Deco-style commercial building

was built circa 1951. With its intact neon sign

mounted on the building that spells out “Welding

Supply,” this mid-20th century building could be

individually eligible for listing in the National

Register of Historic Places for local architectural

significance. It is within the recommended

Southside Commercial historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of community planning and development, commerce, and industry.

107. House at 125 W. Avenue C

This Mission Revival-style house was built between 1920 and 1927 within the original Mexican-American neighborhood developed by 1910 near the KCM&O tracks and depots. With its distinctive Mission features, it may be eligible for

individual listing in the National Register of

Historic Places for local architectural significance.

Its brick veneer exterior is an original feature. It is

within the recommended Oriente Barrio historic district, and would contribute to that district for

local significance in the areas of ethnic heritage and community development. This house is endangered.

45

119. Commercial Building at 811

S. Chadbourne St. This distinctive Moderne-style building was built between 1931 and 1949, and is shown on the 1949 Sanborn Map as a concrete block restaurant. In 1952, “Mac” McIntire opened McIntire’s Drive-In Restaurant in this building and put up its distinctive freestanding sign, which still stands along Chadbourne St. (see old photo on page 19), along with its drive-in auto awning in front of the building. “Mac” McIntire and his wife, Bea, operated their drive-in restaurant here until 1976. With its sleek, horizontal curved lines and original porthole and glass-

block windows, as well as its heritage as a 1950s drive-in icon, this building may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural and historic significance. It is within the recommended Southside Commercial historic district, and

would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of community planning and development and commerce. This building is endangered.

46

120A. Commercial Building at 803

S. Chadbourne St.

This Moderne service station was built between 1920 and 1927 in the shadow of the KCM&O Railroad passenger depot. By 1931, this corner on Chadbourne became a tourist cottage camp that included 15 cottages separated by auto garages or carports, this filling station,

and a store. By 1949, the cottages and camp were gone, but the filling station remained. With its sleek, horizontal lines and original porthole windows, this filling station may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places for architectural significance. It is within the recommended Southside Commercial historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of community planning and development and commerce. This building is endangered. The building behind the filling station, resource no. 120B, is not a high-priority resource.

121. Commercial/Industrial Building at

805 S. Chadbourne St.

This Moderne-style warehouse was built between 1931 and 1949 along the KCM&O railroad tracks as a beer warehouse. It is built of concrete blocks with steel trusses and still has its original steel windows. In 1949, a railroad spur ran from the main tracks up to the south elevation of this warehouse. With its low, horizontal lines and original windows, this stucco warehouse could be eligible for individual listing in the National

Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Southside Commercial historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of community planning and development, commerce, and industry.

47

127. Commercial Building at 609 S.

Chadbourne St.

This Moderne-style movie theater was built between 1931 and 1949. It was built of concrete blocks with wood trusses and featured air conditioning when it opened. With its stepped and stepped-back parapet, horizontal lines, and intact concave central ticket window, this theater may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places. It is within the recommended Southside Commercial historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of community planning and development and commerce. This building is endangered.

130. Commercial Building at

606 S. Irving St.

R.C. Gunter, the youngest of the Gunter brothers, opened Gunter Wholesale Co., which deals in electronic and electric wholesale equipment and supplies, in 1952.32 That’s when he built this International-style headquarters. With its sleek, horizontal lines,

unadorned wall surfaces, and narrow row of casement windows, Gunter Wholesale may be individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Southside Commercial historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of community planning and development, commerce, and industry.

134. Commercial Building at 434 S. Irving St.

It appears this building was constructed circa 1958 to 1960, because of its post-war contemporary shed style. With its multi-level flat and shed sloping roofs, this building may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places. It is within the recommended Southside Commercial historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of community planning and development and commerce.

48

173.Commercial/Industrial

Building at 350 S. Oakes St.

This Art Deco-style brick building was constructed between 1920 and 1927 for Troy Laundry. It replaced an earlier building that was located on the north end of the same lot, which was built between 1908 and 1913, and was one of the first commercial buildings constructed

south of the Concho River. The Bledsoe family opened Troy Laundry for business in 1908.33 With its intact deco awning and signs, this building may be eligible for listing individually in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Southside Commercial historic district, and would contribute to that district for local significance in the areas of community planning and development, commerce, and industry. This iconic early business headquarters in San Angelo is endangered.

175. House at 134 Allen St.

This Craftsman-style bungalow was built between 1920 and 1927. According to its owner, Norma Gilman, it was built for the Bledsoe family, the owners of Troy Laundry, as their family home. With its clipped gables and multi-pane upper wood windows, this house may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is

contributing to that district in the area of community planning and development.

49

176. House at 138 Allen St.

This Craftsman-style brick house was built between 1920 and 1927. According to its owner, Norma Gilman, it was built for the family of an early optical doctor in San Angelo. With its distinct Craftsman features like eave brackets and exposed rafter tails, this house may be individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic

District, and is contributing to that district in the area of community planning and development. 179. Rio Concho Park

Located along the south side of the Concho River, Rio Concho Park was developed by the city in 1967. Rio Concho Manor, located across Rio Concho Drive to the south, donated nine acres of land where the park is located to the city. The Fragrance Garden, now known as Rio Concho Garden, was built in 1989 honoring early nurserymen of San Angelo.34 When Rio Concho Park reaches 50 years old in 2017, it may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C for local significance in landscape architecture and under Criterion A for local significance in Community Planning and Development.

180. Rio Concho Manor

Rio Concho Trust constructed the

west wing of this 10-story International-

style multi-family housing building

between 1964 and 1967. Several

community leaders, including Houston

Harte, formed the trust to create low-

income housing for senior citizens. The east

wing of Rio Concho Manor was added in

1972. When the west wing becomes 50 year

old, in 2014, Rio Concho may be eligible

for individual listing in the National

50

Register of Historic Places. With its unadorned

exterior concrete surfaces, ribbons of casement

windows and cantilevered awning, Rio Concho

may satisfy Criterion C for local architectural

significance. Because it is the first low-income

housing facility for senior citizens built in the

community, Rio Concho may meet Criterion A

for local historic significance under the area of

community planning and development. And

because of its association with Houston Harte,

a powerful Texas media leader, Rio Concho

may meet Criterion B for association with a significant person in statewide history. Both Rio

Concho Manor and Rio Concho Park are within the recommended Rio Concho Historic District,

and both would be contributing resources to the district.

181. House at 401 Allen St.

It is difficult to trace the evolution of this house on Sanborn Insurance Maps. With its brackets and gabled front porch, it has Craftsman-style characteristics, which were popular locally during the early 20th century. But parts of this house look much older, as if it was a folk hall-and-parlor house with an end chimney. The brick chimney is now located near the center of this house. It could be that this is an older house that was moved to this location during the early 20th century

and enlarged. This house may be individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of community planning and development. This house is endangered by neglect. 187. House at 317 Allen St.

This brick-veneered house was built between 1920 and 1927. With its unusual gable-end or shotgun form and Crafstman-style characteristics, this house may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of community planning and development.

51

188. House at 311 Allen St.

This Tudor-Revival style house was built between 1927 and 1931. It appears that a two-story addition was subsequently built on the back, or south elevation, of the house. With its distinctive Tudor Revival features like a front exterior chimney and steep gables, this house may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of

community planning and development.

195. House at 215 Bird St.

Built circa 1901 and definitely before 1908, this folk gable-front-and-wing house is one of the oldest houses in the Fort Concho Addition. With its Queen Anne-style features such as a projecting three-window bay and fish-scale shingles in the front gable, this house may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of local community planning and development.

198A. House at 200 Bird St.

Built circa 1906, and definitely by

1908, this folk pyramidal house is also one of

the oldest in the Fort Concho Addition. With

its simple pyramidal, symmetrical form

featuring a classical central entrance that has

sidelights and a transom, this house may be

eligible for individual listing in the National

Register of Historic Places for local

architectural significance. It is within the

recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of local community planning and

development. This house is endangered.

52

199. House at 206 Bird St.

Built circa 1906, and definitely by

1908, this Craftsman-style bungalow is

also one of the oldest in the Fort Concho

Addition. With its simple pyramidal

form, flared eaves and inset porch

featuring tapered box supports on brick

piers, this house may be eligible for

individual listing in the National Register

of Historic Places for local architectural

significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of local community planning and development.

201. House at 220 Bird St.

This Craftsman-style bungalow

was built between 1908 and 1913. With

its simple pyramidal form, flared eaves

and inset porch, this house may be

eligible for individual listing in the

National Register of Historic Places for

local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of local community planning and development. This house is endangered.

206. House at 221 Allen St.

This Craftsman-style bungalow was

built between 1920 and 1927. With its

Craftsman details, like its gabled front

porch and tapered box supports, this house

may be eligible for individual listing in the

National Register of Historic Places for

local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of local community planning and development. This house also features a narrow, paved two-lane ribbon driveway.

53

217. House at 120 Bird St.

This Queen Anne-style house was

built between 1908 and 1913. With its

asymmetrical form and classical front porch,

this house may be eligible for individual

listing in the National Register of Historic

Places for local architectural significance.

It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of local community planning and development.

219. House at 132 Bird St.

Built before 1908, this Queen Anne-style house is one of the oldest houses in the Fort Concho Addition. With its Queen Anne features such as an asymmetrical form and wrap-around front porch, this house may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district

in the area of local community planning and development.

222. House at 325 Rust St.

This Craftsman-style bungalow was built between 1931 and 1949, during the same time period that other buildings in Texas were constructed using petrified wood and fossils. Because of the use of petrified wood on the exterior of this house as an unusual building material, it may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historical Places for local architectural significance. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of local community planning and development.

54

231. House at 410 Baker St.

This house was built between 1931 and 1949 as a Boy Scout Hut. It was probably built after the San Angelo Boy Scout village, which was located north of the Concho River and south of Concho Avenue just west of Randolph Street, flooded in 1936 and was destroyed. Today this house is used as a single-family dwelling. Because of its history as a Boy Scout Hut, this house may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places under

Criterion A for local significance in the area of entertainment and recreation. It is within the recommended Fort Concho Historic District, and is contributing to that district in the area of local community planning and development.

248. Commercial/Industrial

Building at 417 E. Avenue D

This Moderne-style building was constructed between 1931 and 1949 as a Motor Freight Station, during the time period when rail shipping was beginning to give way to motor transport. With its Moderne features and association with local transportation history, this building may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local architectural significance and for local historic significance in the area of transportation. This building

is included in the recommended multiple property nomination to the National Register for resources related to the wool and mohair industry in San Angelo. This building is endangered.

55

251. Two-Lot Commercial

Building at

134 Henry O. Flipper St.

This building, which is

owned by the City of San Angelo,

was built between 1927 and 1931.

The corner building, or east half,

was built of brick-faced tile with

iron and wood posts and was home

to Texas Stockmen Supply Co.,

which ground and mixed feed in the

building, and stored wool as a

warehouse. The west half of the

building is constructed of brick

with wood posts, and was originally

home to San Angelo Grocery Co.

By 1949, the building to the west was home to a wholesale beer company. With its association with the local wool industry and other businesses, this building may be eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local historic significance in the areas of agriculture and commerce. This building is included in the recommended multiple property nomination to the National Register for resources related to the wool and mohair industry in San Angelo.

56

Endnotes

1 Robert Bluthardt, Through the Centuries at Old Fort Concho, unpublished manuscript prepared for Ranch

Magazine, 2009. 2 Ibid. 3 David Wood, General History of Railroading in the San Angelo Area, Railway Museum of San Angelo, 2009,

http://railwaymuseumsanangelo.homestead.com/history. 4 City of San Angelo, Comprehensive Plan—Downtown Enhancement, 2003, www.sanangelotexas.org. 5 San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts, History, www.samfa.org/history. 6 “Historic Zoning, San Angelo, Texas, A History Worth Preserving,” brochure published by the San Angelo

Historic Preservation Commission. 7 Gus Clemens, The Concho Country (San Antonio: Mulberry Avenue Books, 1980), 69. 8 J. Evetts Haley, Fort Concho and the Texas Frontier (San Angelo: San Angelo Standard-Times, 1952), 305. 9 Sanborn Insurance Map, San Angelo, Texas, 1900. 10 Sanborn Insurance Map, San Angelo, Texas, 1894. 11 Tom Green County Historical Society Collection, West Texas Archives, Angelo State University. 12 Sanborn Insurance Map, San Angelo, Texas, 1904. 13 Haley, Fort Concho and the Texas Frontier, 304. 14 Historic and Archeological Resources of San Angelo, National Register Nomination, www.thc.state.tx.us/atlas. 15 Sanborn Insurance Map, San Angelo, Texas, 1908 and 1913, and Tom Green County Historical Society Photo

Collection. 16 Clemens, The Concho Country, 138. 17 Ibid. 18 Arnoldo De Leon, San Angelenos, Mexican Americans in San Angelo, Texas (San Angelo: Fort Concho Museum

Press, 1985), 33. 19 Ibid, 39; Sanborn Insurance Map, San Angelo, Texas, 1913; and Directory of City of San Angelo, Texas, 1913

(Dallas: John F. Worley Directory Co., 1913), 33. 20 De Leon, San Angelenos, 37 and 39. 21 “Permian Basin Thrives in Latest Oil Boom,” Oil Daily, 20 June 2006. 22 Clemens, The Concho Country, 142. 23 Ibid, 99. 24 U.S. Census Bureau, “Poverty Thresholds 1969,”

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/threshld/thresh69.html. 25 De Leon, San Angelenos, 99 and Clemens, The Concho Country, 163. 26 “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,” National Register Bulletin, U.S. Department of the

Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources, National Register, History and Education, 1998, 2. 27 Zoning Ordinance, City of San Angelo, Article 2, Development Review, Chapter 12, Section 211, 2-32. 28 “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,” 44-49. 29 Ibid. 30 “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,” National Register Bulletin, 4-5. 31 Handbook of Texas Online, s.v., http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/onlinearticles/TThct7.html, (accessed

October 29, 2006). 32“Ken Gunter Interview,” The Hauser Oral and Video History Collection,

http://www.cablecenter.org/content.cfm?id=511, (accessed August 13, 2011). 33 “David C. Bledsoe, Obituary,” San Angelo Standard Times, June 15, 2000. 34 “Parks in San Angelo, Texas, A History,” San Angelo, Home of Historic Concho Avenue—Parks History,

http://www.sanangelotexas.org/index, (accessed Feb. 4, 2011).

57

Bibliography

“America from the Great Depression to World War II: Photographs from the FSA-OWI, 1935-

1945.” American Memory. U.S. Library of Congress, http://memory.loc.gov/. Bell Klein & Hoffman. Fort Concho National Historic Landmark, San Angelo, Texas, A

Masterplan for Redevelopment. San Angelo: City of San Angelo, 1980. Blumenson, John J.-G. Identifying American Architecture. New York: W.W. Norton and

Company, Inc., 1983. Bluthardt, Robert. Through the Centuries at Old Fort Concho. Unpublished manuscript prepared for Ranch Magazine. 2009. Center for History of Engineering and Technology, Texas Tech University. Final Report,

Historical /Architectural Survey of San Angelo, Texas, September 30, 1985. Clemens, Gus. Concho Country. San Antonio: Mulberry Avenue Books, 1980. Colp, David E. Papers, 1917-1936, Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin. Culbertson, Margaret. Texas Houses Built by the Book, the Use of Published Designs, 1950-

1925. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1999. De Leon, Arnoldo. San Angelenos, Mexican Americans in San Angelo, Texas. San Angelo: Fort

Concho Museum Press, 1985. Directory of the City of San Angelo, 1908 and 1913. Dallas: John F. Worley Directory Co. Gunter, Ken. “Interview,” The Hauser Oral and Video History Collection,

http://www.cablecenter.org/content, accessed August 13, 2011. Haley, J. Evetts. Fort Concho and the Texas Frontier. San Angelo: San Angelo Standard-Times, 1952. Henry, Jay C. Architecture in Texas, 1895-1945. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1993. Handbook of Texas Online, including articles about San Angelo and Tom Green County. “Historic and Archeological Resources of San Angelo,” National Register Multiple Property

Nomination, http://atlas.thc.state.tux.us. “Historic Zoning, San Angelo, Texas, A History Worth Preserving,” brochure published by the San Angelo Historic Preservation Commission.

58

“How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation.” National Register Bulletin. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources, National Register, History and Education, 1998. Longstreth, Richard. The Buildings of Main Street, A Guide to American Commercial

Architecture. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press, 2000. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. “Parks in San Angelo, Texas, A History.” San Angelo, Home of Historic Concho Avenue—Parks

History, http://www.sanangelotexas.org/index, accessed Feb. 4, 2011. “Permian Basin Thrives in Latest Oil Boom.” Oil Daily, 20 June 2006. Poppeliers, John C., S. Allen Chambers, Jr. and Nancy B. Schwartz. What Style Is It? A Guide to

American Architecture. Washington, D.C.: The Preservation Press, 1983. San Angelo Comprehensive Plan. San Angelo: City of San Angelo, 2003. San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts. History. www.samfa.org/history.

San Angelo Standard-Times, 20 Jan. 1957; 15 Sept. 1996; 7 Dec. 1997; 15 June 2000, 12 March 2001.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps of San Angelo, 1908, 1913, 1920, 1927, 1931, 1931-1949. Sasser, Elizabeth Skidmore. Dugoout to Deco, Building in West Texas, 1880 to 1930. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press, 1993. Tom Green County Historical Society Papers. West Texas Collection, Angelo State University. “1989 Tom Green County Historical Guide, Centennial Edition, 1889-1989.” U.S. Census Bureau. “Poverty Thresholds 1969.” http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/. “Welcome to Downtown San Angelo, Inc.,” Downtown San Angelo, www.dtsa.org/mission. Wyatt, Barbara. 1978 Survey of Historic Resources, San Angelo, Texas. Wood, David. General History of Railroading in the San Angelo Area. Railway Museum of San

Angelo, 2009, http://railwaymuseumsanangelo.homestead.com/history. Zoning Ordinance, City of San Angelo. Article 2, Development Review, Chapter 12,

Section 211.

60

Appendix B HIGH PRIORITY PROPERTIES SURVEY FORMS

61

APPENDIX C

PHOTO INDEX SHEETS AND BLACK-AND-WHITE CONTACT SHEETS AND NEGATIVES

62

Appendix D

UPDATE ON BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS OF FORT CONCHO

SINCE 1980 MASTER PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT BY BOB BLUTHARDT

63

Fort Concho National Historic Landmark

San Angelo, Texas

Update on Buildings & Grounds Since 1980 Master Plan for Development

Officers Quarters 1

Restored in the early 1990s to its 1870s exterior appearance and opened in 1992 as the Concho

Valley Pioneers Heritage Center. Facility used to house city and fort/community VIPs and

guests. Furnished with late 1800s/early 1900s artifacts. Building has full heat/ac, two bathrooms,

three bedrooms, dining room, kitchen, and side office/meeting room. Rear room never finished

and presents a long-term issue for stabilization; second story dormer window needs work on its

supports. Both projects lack funding; one was funded and de-funded in FY 10.

Officers’ Quarters 2

Upstairs space upgraded for a staff office ten years ago when Officers’ Quarters 7 was taken off

line for total repairs/reconstruction. Office now used by fort staffer. Downstairs used for some

public programs and events, but ceiling tiles need replacement and floor needs replacement.

Overall exterior restored to 1870s appearance.

Officers’ Quarters 3

Front west room and two east rooms restored to 1870s appearance and furnished to fort’s

military period, available to visitors seven days/week. Project done in early1990s. Rear kitchen

not restored and currently used for storage. Exterior of building restored to 1870s appearance.

Officers’ Quarters 4

Inside of building lacked 1800s features in early 1990s when Fort Concho worked with

GTE/Southwest to retrofit space to house GTE Danner Museum of Telephony relocated from

GTE’s Johnson Street building to fort. GTE since acquired by Verizon who steadily cut its

financial support for operation of the museum. Several years ago Verizon deeded the museum

collection to city/fort. Currently available to visitors on demand throughout the week and with

tours sometimes provided by GTE Telephone Pioneers Club. Exterior of building restored to

1870s appearance.

64

Officers’ Quarters 5

Originally an officers’ quarters similar to OQ 3, this building lost its second story in a 1920s fire,

was cut back to a single story, and was a dangerous ruin in the late 1970s, when it was stabilized

back to its original stone walls. Staff has created an interpretive sign that is brought out daily and

placed in a holder in front of the ruin.

Officers’ Quarters 6

Once the officers’ quarters interpreted to the visitors, the project at OQ 3 replaced it for daily

tours. Building is only used for Frontier Day in April and Christmas at Old Fort Concho in

December, plus a few days here and there throughout the year. The rear kitchen is used for

period cooking demonstrations. Structurally, it needs much work.

Exterior is restored to its 1870s appearance.

Officers’ Quarters 7

This structure exhibited serious cracks in the east and west walls, so after much study and

discussion, the building was evacuated of staff and contents about eight years ago and fully

reconstructed and reinforced with a total interior restoration. It now houses the Library/Archives,

a research room, additional office space, and the special events office/staff member. It is the

largest building along Officers’ Row as it was originally built as a duplex for unmarried officers.

Officers’ Quarters 8

OQ 8 represents the first professionally directed restoration at this fort done in the 1960s, in a

partnership between the fort and the Junior League. Currently used for meetings, public

programs, rentals, and some classes, it has some structural issues to be addressed in the rear hall

and roof sections. Exterior reflects its original 1880s appearance.

Officers’ Quarters 9

Restored inside and out in the early 1980s with some minor repairs since that time, OQ 9

houses the office and storage of the site’s education program coordinator.

Schoolhouse/Chapel

The last building erected on site, it has had several “restorations” and changes, settling into its

current state by 1976. It is furnished and interpreted as a military schoolhouse/chapel of the early

1880s. Available for daily tours, it also houses the fort’s Frontier School Program, an 1880s-style

65

recreated school day offered to all fourth graders in the city and surrounding counties. Rented

now and then for a wedding, the building offers an intimate setting for some museum events.

Post Hospital

Reconstructed in the late 1980s on its original foundations, the Hospital was part of a three-part

project that brought down the old ward school that sat on the Parade Ground, reconstructed the

Hospital, and built a new elementary school partially located on Fort Concho’s southeast corner.

The north ward is restored and furnished to reflect medical care at Fort Concho ca. 1880; the

Central Ward has a variety of medical history displays; the south ward is the elementary school

library. Porches, roof, and cupola have all been rebuilt/repaired over the past five years; rear

sections need some repairs.

TB Bungalow

Rescued from destruction in the late 1980s when the new elementary school was being

constructed, this structure was one of several on the school building site. It represented a TB

Court or complex, when San Angelo was a noted treatment area for tuberculosis due to the

region’s dry climate. The structure was once furnished and interpreted, but it was taken off line

by the late 1990s and staff have been trying to find it a worthy purpose and/or different home.

Post Headquarters

Fort Concho Museum and the preservation project started here in 1930. Four of the downstairs

rooms have been restored/furnished to reflect their military administration functions of the

1870s; the far south rooms house general exhibits (as well as a non-period flagstone floor).

Upstairs have office space not currently used and some storage.

Ruffini Home/Office

The home and office of pioneer architect Oscar Ruffini, this structure was moved to Fort Concho

from its downtown location in 1951 when the fort was to be a more general purpose/theme

enterprise. It has not been interpreted in twenty years and all artifacts have been removed.

Attempts to find it a new and appropriate home have not been successful. It needs to be

someplace else where it can serve some historical/public service function.

Quartermaster

The San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts began its existence here in the early 1980s when it fully

restored the outside to its 1860s appearance and retrofitted the inside to office, storage, and

66

gallery space. When the art museum moved to its impressive new building up the street by the

Concho River in 1999, the fort took the building back, holding some displays, renting the space,

and offering some public programs.

Commissary

The fort and the San Angelo Junior League joined forces again to restore this impressive

structure in 1980 and shared its use until the League moved to a downtown building about ten

years ago. The Commissary had its floor replaced about ten years ago. It hosts meetings, rental

activities, and public programs throughout the year. With its neighbor the Quartermaster, it is the

oldest building (1868) at the fort, and thus oldest in the city, county, and region.

Powderhouse

Originally located a few blocks up current Burgess street (who wants gunpowder too close to a

building?), this building was moved to its site near Barracks 6 about 55 years ago. It has been

maintained with its original exterior appearance…and we store ammunition here for our living

history programs, but not enough to do anyone any harm!

Barracks 5-Mess Hall 5; Barracks 6-Mess Hall 6

These four buildings were all in some ruinous state by the early 1950s, when they were

reconstructed by the San Angelo Jay Cees. Over the past thirty years the function and interiors

have changed, so here is a summary:

Barracks 6: General history displays and the gift shop until 1995; rental and display/program

building since then. Heat/ac added about eight years ago; new concrete floor pad for a future

wooden floor now in process.

Mess Hall 6: General displays; converted to storage/office for guide staff and living history

storage in late 1990s. Not open to public.

Barracks 5: General displays until 1983 when it was restored into its current early 1880s Infantry

Barracks mode over several years. Available for daily tours.

Mess Hall 5: General exhibits until the late 1980s when it was converted to a period 1880s Mess

Hall to complement its barracks. Available on daily tours.

67

Barracks/Mess Halls 3 & 4

The foundations were excavated in the 1980s and 1990s, then covered and protected. Should the

right opportunity and funding arise, they could be rebuilt.

Barracks 1 & 2

These barracks were part of the full row of six army barracks. By 1980, they were attached to the

Monarch Tile Company’s manufacturing complex to the north. The fort bought the entire block

to obtain the barracks. In 1995, Barracks 1 was restored into the current Visitor Center; Barracks

2 followed and was extended to its original length, a segment cut off in the 1900s when a street

was cut through the site. Both barracks were separated from the Monarch Tile block ten years

ago when that non-historic property was renovated into the State office Building. Barracks 1 was

finished on its exterior; the east section remains unfinished. Barracks 2 was finished on its

outside, but the inside remains un-restored.

Both mess halls were lost after 1900.

Parade Ground

With the elimination of the Fort Concho Elementary School in the late 1980s and the clearing of

the power poles and sheds at the west end in the late 1990s, the fort’s Parade Ground became

clear for the first time in nearly a century.

Stables Block

Located on Flipper Street, the last two original stables, called Bay 2 and Bay 3, are sandwiched

between a 1900s wool warehouse to the west and a post WWII building to the east. All were

purchased with the land behind it in 1997 to complete the north side of the fort. The far west

section was renovated ten years ago and houses the Concho Valley Workforce Center; the far

east section is the fort’s Collections Storehouse with extra storage to the rear.

Bay 2 is one of the original 1870s stables and now houses the Concho Christmas Lights

Displays; the Bay 3 section has been steadily improved since its purchase and now serves as a

large (12,750 square feet) meeting and function hall.

Post Bakery

Located distant from the core Parade Ground and buildings (for fire safety concerns), the bakery

had been used for storage and then as a residence for a fort groundskeeper in the 1980s and

1990s. After the staff member passed away and his family relocated, the building was secured. It

68

currently has no storage. Staff explored several options to remove the post-fort era construction

as the core bakery probably sites within the existing structure, but funding and a lack of reliable

data on the building has put any work on hold indefinitely.

Post Bandstand

Located at the far west end of the Parade Ground on a mid-point between OQ 1 and Barracks 1

(and in line with Headquarters), the bandstand was constructed in the mid-1880s according to

some recent research. There are but three photos about the structure and next-to-nothing written

about it in the post records explored thus far. Staff and board would like to reconstruct it, but

more research is necessary. It fell to ruins after the fort’s abandonment and was, at best—an

informally built structure.

69

APPENDIX E

MAP OF SURVEY AREA SHOWING LOCATIONS OF RESOURCES (Stars indicate High-Priority Resources)

59

Appendix A SURVEYED RESOURCES INVENTORY DATA SHEETS

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Res

ourc

e N

o.

Bla

ck a

nd W

hite

R

oll N

o./F

ram

e N

o.

Add

ress

No.

Street Resource Name Owner NR

RTH

L

Loca

l

Loca

l Dis

tric

t

Priority Resource Type/Sub-Type Outbuildings Landscape Style Roof Construction Wall Façade No. of Bays Chimneys Windows Doors

1 304 W. Avenue A

Girl Scouts Little

House

El Camino Girl

Scout Council x x High

Educational

Building Sidewalks Craftsman

Hipped,

Composition Frame

Wood Siding

and cut

Limestone 5

Wood, double-

hung, 6/6 Double door

2 301 W. Avenue A Fidencio C. Ramirez High House

Sidewalks, rock

wall Craftsman

Hipped,

Composition Frame Wood Siding 3

Wood, double-

hung

Single door,

transom and

sidelights

3 305 W. Avenue A

Pamela Avey

Underwood Medium House

Sidewalks, rock

wall with

petrified wood Tudor Revival

Gable,

composition, gable

dormer Frame Wood Siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

4 309 W. Avenue A

Pamela Avey

Underwood Medium House

Frame

apartment with

address of 307

W. Ave. A

Sidewalks, rock

wall Craftsman Gable, composition Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung, casement Single door

5 502 S. Koenigheim

Crockett National

Bank

Crockett County

National Bank Medium

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

parking lot Commercial Flat with parapet

Pre-cast

concrete

Concrete

panels Fixed, aluminum Double door

6 308 W. Avenue B

Zeke and Krista

Loretto Medium House

2, Storage

building and

garage/

apartment Sidewalks National Folk Gable, composition Frame Wood Siding

2, interior,

brick;

exterior,

brick

Aluminum,

casement; wood,

double-hung

Single door with

sidelights

7 302 W. Avenue B Alan Walter Kautz High House Garage

Sidewalks, low

rock wall Prairie

Hipped,

Composition Brick Brick

1,

exterior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung Single door

8 331 W. Avenue B

Associated

Attorneys

Galen A. and

Rosaina D. Moeller Low

Commercial

building Parking lot Craftsman Gable, composition Frame

Brick veneer,

wood siding Fixed

Single door with

one sidelight

9 329 W. Avenue B

R.F. Strickland and

June S. Guenther High House Sidewalks Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails

and brackets Frame Wood Siding

Wood, double-

hung, 3/1 Single door

10 325 W. Avenue B Roy G. Trevino Medium House

Sidewalks, low

brick wall

Spanish

Eclectic

Gable and flat with

parapet Brick Brick

1,

exterior,

brick

Aluminum, double-

hung, arched bay

in front, decorative

screenwork Single door

11 319 W. Avenue B

Frank and Chris

Hinds High House Storage building Sidewalks Craftsman

Hipped,

Composition,

hipped dormer Frame Wood Siding

Wood, double-

hung

Two Single

doors with

transoms and

sidelights

12 317 W. Avenue B Lester Daniel Medium House

Sidewalks, low

stucco wall

around porch

Spanish

Eclectic Gable, composition Frame Stucco 3

1,

exterior,

stucco

Wood, double-

hung Two single doors

13 315 W. Avenue B

Ramon and

Marisela D.

Vasquez High House Storage building

Terracing,

retainng wall Craftsman

Hipped,

Composition,

hipped dormer Frame Wood Siding

Wood, double-

hung

Two Single

doors with

transoms and

sidelights

14 305 W. Avenue B Patrick Green Low House Storage building Sidewalks Craftsman Gable, composition Frame

Wood Siding,

vertical

Wood, double-

hung Two single doors

15 303 W. Avenue B

John D. Edwards,

deceased,

attention: Dorene

Edwards High House

Two-story

garage/ storage

building with

560- square-

feet apartment Craftsman

Gable, metal,

exposed rafter tails

and brackets Frame

Wood Siding,

wood

shingles in

front gable

1,

exterior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung, with multi-

panes above front

window and cross-

gabled bay on

west elevation Single door

16 302 W. Avenue C

William Carl Sherz,

Jr. Low House Garage Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Asbestos

siding

Wood, double-

hung Two single doors

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

17 306 W. Avenue C Clara Sosa Medium House Walkway Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood Siding

Wood, double-

hung, 6/6 Single door

18 312 W. Avenue C

Ignacia V. Cabrera,

deceased, c/o

Debbie Garza Low House Sidewalks Craftsman Gable, composition Frame Wood Siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

19 318 W. Avenue C

Raul S. Galen,

deceased Medium House Storage building

Sidewalks,

nandicapped

ramp from

walkway to

front porch Craftsman

Hipped,

Composition Frame

Wood Siding,

vertical

Wood, double-

hung

Single door with

sidelights

20 320 W. Avenue C

Raul and Jessie M.

Galan, deceased Medium House Sidewalks Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails

and brackets Frame Masonite

1,

exterior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung Single door

21

322-

324 W. Avenue C

Beatriz Martinez

and Jose Tovar Low House Craftsman

Gable,

composition, gable

dormer Frame

Brick veneer,

wood siding

Fixed, vinyl or

aluminum, some

of original window

openings enclosed Two single doors

22

330-

332 W. Avenue C George D. Bean Medium House Sidewalks

Colonial

Revival Gable, composition Frame

Asbestos

siding

Wood, double-

hung Two single doors

23 333 W. Avenue C

Christian House

of Prayer

(formerly Park

Heights Baptist

Church)

Christian House of

Prayer Medium Church Sidewalks

Flat with parapet

and gable,

composition Frame

Stucco,

stone and

brick

Fixed, several

boarded over,

including large

opening in front Single door

24 319 W. Avenue C

William Carl Sherz,

Jr. High House Shed

Sidewalks,

pond Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding Double-hung

25 317 W. Avenue C

West Texas

Dominion

Properties, Ltd. High House Garage Sidewalks Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Stucco,

diamond-

shaped

shingles in

gables

1,

exterior,

stucco

Wood, double-

hung, 3/1 Single door

26 303 W. Avenue C Frank G. Ruiz Medium House

Circular drive,

wood fencing

Contemporary

, post-war

modern

Shallow gable,

composition Frame Stucco

1, interior,

stone

Wood, aluminum,

double-hung Two single doors

27 301 W. Avenue C Laura M. McMillan Medium House

Sidewalks,

metal fencing Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Asbestos or

concrete

siding

1,

exterior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung Single door

28 707 S. Randolph

Eugene and Bertha

Gonzales Medium House

Drive, wood

privacy fence

in rear

National Folk,

gable-front

and wing Gable, composition Frame

Vertical

wood siding

1, interior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung Single door

29 302 W. Avenue D Eugene Gonzales Medium House

Sidewalks,

drive, fence Ranch

Hipped,

Composition, wide

eaves Frame Brick veneer

1, interior,

brick

Fixed, 9-pane bay

window south

elev.; double-

hung, aluminum

Single door with

one sidelight

30 306 W. Avenue D

Julian and

Josephine Casillas Medium House Shed

Sidewalks,

drive, fence Ranch Gable, composition Frame Brick veneer

1,

exterior,

brick

Casement,

aluminum Single door

31 316 W. Avenue D Willie R. Valdez Medium House Sidewalks

Contemporary

, post-war

modern

Flat with slight

pitch, deep eaves

and eave brackets Frame

Vertical

wood siding

Casement,

aluminum Single door

32 320 W. Avenue D

Jesse and M. Elaine

Camarena Medium House

Sidewalks,

drive, fence

Contemporary

, post-war

modern

Shallow hipped,

metal, wide eaves,

eave brackets Frame Wood Siding

Casement,

aluminum Single door

33 326 W. Avenue D

Monica Terrazas,

deceased Medium House Shed

Sidewalks,

drive Ranch

Shallow hipped,

composition, wide

eaves Frame

Wood siding,

brick on

bottom

Fixed by front

door, wood, double-

hung Single door

34 325 W. Avenue D Bertha S. Vidal Medium House

Drive,

walkway, wood

privacy fence

National Folk,

shotgun

Hipped,

Composition Frame

Vertical

concrete

siding Double hung Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

35 321 W. Avenue D

Sergio G. and

Nancy G. Pena Medium House

Walkway, chain

link fence Crafstman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Asbestos

siding

Double-hung,

aluminum storms Single door

36 315 W. Avenue D

Gregoria Martinez

Gutierrez Low Office/House Shed

Dirt parking

area in front

Spanish

Eclectic Hipped, tile Stucco

Vinyl, double-

hung, bay with

gable on west end Single door

37 311 W. Avenue D

Eugene C. (Sr.)

and Betha

Gonzales Medium House

Walkway, chain

link fence

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor Gable, composition Frame

Asbestos

siding, fake

stone skirt

Aluminum, sliding

and double-hung Single door

38 305 W. Avenue D Mizael Martinez Medium House

Wire fence in

rear, front

walkway

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor Gable, composition Frame

Vertical

wood Vinyl, double-hung Single door

39 301 W. Avenue D Nancy A. White Low House Front walkway Ranch Gable, composition Frame

Wood or

concrete

siding Vinyl, double-hung Single door

40 304 W. Washington Mary M. Luna Low

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

drive, parking,

handicapped

ramp, arched

stucco garden

gateway, iron

fence, gardens,

flagpoles Mission Gable, composition

Precast

concrete

panels,

stucco

around porch

entry 1, vinyl, fixed Double door

41 308 W. Washington

Genaro R. and

Linda M. Duran Low

Commercial

building Parking Commercial Flat with parapet Brick Aluminum, fixed

Single door,

much of entry

enclosed

42 310 W. Washington

Thomas D.

Richardson,

deceased Low

Commercial

building Drive, parking Commercial

Flat with parapet,

stair-stepped on

east elevation Stucco

Fixed, mostly

boarded up

Single door with

sidelights

43 312 W. Washington Jose M. Medina Low

Commercial

building

Unpaved drive

and parking Commercial Gable, metal

Brick,

concrete

Brick, sheets

of wood on

front None

Single door of

plywood

44 330 W. Washington Jennifer M. Gaona

Medium*

(see

Other

Informa-

tion

column)

Commercial

Building Paved parking

Post-War

Modern;

International

Flat with parapet

and flat, metal Masonry Stucco Fixed

Double door

entry on first

floor, single on

second floor

45 230 W. Washington Lamoine Abbott Low

Commercial

building

Second metal

building to north

connected by

open walkway

covered with

metal canopy

Sidewalk,

paved parking Commercial

Shallow gable,

metal Metal

Brick façade

on south

elevation

along

Washington

Dr. Vinyl, fixed Double door

46 222 W. Washington Sandra Echeverria Medium House Storage shed

Sidewalk, drive

wire fence

Minimal

Traditional Gable, composition Frame

Metal or

vinyl siding Vinyl, double-hung Single door

47

216-

218 W. Washington Gary Harper

Medium*

(see

Other

Informa-

tion

column) House/ Office

Sidewalks,

drive Pueblo Revival Flat with parapet Stucco

Fixed, decorative

screenwork Two single doors

48 204 W. Washington

Henry's Auto

Service

Richard B. and

Katherine P. Henry Low

Commercial

building Parking Commercial Flat with parapet

Metal and

other

Metal and

Stucco

Single door, 4

garage doors

49 219 W. Avenue D Laura M. McMillan Medium House

Unpaved drive,

walkway Crafstman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood Siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

50 225 W. Avenue D Jose G. Dominguez High House

Walkway, chain

link fence in

rear

National Folk,

gable-front

and wing Gable, composition Frame Wood Siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

51 222 W. Avenue D

Jose Luis and

Claudia Rodriguez Low House Shed Sidewalks Crafstman Gable, composition Frame Vinyl siding Vinyl, double-hung

Single door with

sidelights

52 220 W. Avenue D Julia P. Arocha Low House Sidewalks

National Folk,

gable-front

and wing Gable, composition Frame Stucco

Aluminum, double-

hung, 3-bay in

front Single door

53 218 W. Avenue D

Ruben and Susan

Fernandez Low House Shed Sidewalks

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor Gable, metal Frame

Asbestos

siding

Wood, aluminum,

double-hung

Single door,

entry opening

partially

enclosed

54 206 W. Avenue D Steven L. Spencer Low House Shed Sidewalks Ranch Gable, composition Frame Vinyl siding

Fixed bay south

elev., vinyl, double-

hung Single door

55 202 W. Avenue D

Epifanio M.

Gonzalez and M.R.

Martinez Low House Shed Sidewalks

National Folk,

pyrimidal

Hipped,

composition Frame

Vertical

wood

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

56 708 S. Randolph Janie Terrazas Medium House Shed Sidewalks Crafstman

Gable, clipped,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

Aluminum, fixed

and double-hung;

wood, double-hung Single door

58 230 W. Avenue C Ada R. Cruz High House Sidewalks

National Folk,

gable-front

and wing Gable, composition Frame Wood siding

Wood and

aluminum, double-

hung Two single doors

59 226 W. Avenue C

Gonzalo P.

Martinez Medium

House/

Duplex Shed Sidewalks Crafstman Gable, composition Frame

Brick veneer

(original)

Aluminum, double-

hung Two single doors

60 220 W. Avenue C Carmen T. Perez Medium House Shed Sidewalks

Mission

Revival Flat with parapet Frame Stucco

Wood, double-

hung, relief arches

in stucco above

windows Single door

61 216 W. Avenue C

Sandra and Danny

Snyder Medium House Shed

Sidewalks,

wood fence in

rear Crafstman

Gable,

composition, gable

dormers, exposed

rafter tails Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung, vinyl storms

Single door with

transom

62 210 W. Avenue C

Jose Guadalupe

Cruz Medium House Shed

Sidewalks,

drives,

walkway, wood

fence in rear Crafstman

Hipped,

composition Frame

Asbestos

siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

63 208 W. Avenue C J.G. Rosales Medium

House/multi-

family Shed Sidewalks No Style Flat with parapet Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

64

615-

617 S. Hill Medium

House/

Duplex Sidewalks Crafstman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

1, interior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung Two single doors

65 613 S. Hill

Micheil S. Wiegano

and Sylvia A.

Moreno Low

House/

Duplex Shed Sidewalks

Crafstman,

Minimal

Traditional Gable, composition Frame Brick veneer Vinyl, double-hung Two single doors

66 609 S. Hill William smith Medium House Sidewalks Crafstman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter

tails, gable support

brackets Frame Vinyl siding

Wood, double-

hung, aluminum

screens Single door

67 601 S. Hill

Fidencio C.

Ramirez, deceased Low House Sidewalks Ranch

Hipped, low-pitch,

composition, deep

eaves Brick Brick

Aluminum,

casement,

horizontal Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

68 215 W. Avenue B

Willaim M. and

Leticia C. Ruiz High House Sidewalks Crafstman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Wood Siding,

stucco on

lower porch

Wood, double-

hung, decorative

screenwork -

diamond pattern;

bracketed double

bay west

elevation;

bracketed window

in front (north)

gable, shuttered Two single doors

69 217 W. Avenue B

Jose Luis and

Margarita

Fernandez High House Shed

Sidewalks,

chain-link

fence in rear Queen Anne

Hipped,

composition Frame Wood siding Vinyl, double-hung

Single door,

storm door

70 219 W. Avenue B Rosalinda Aguirre Medium House

Sidewalks,

picket fence,

rock garden

wall around

porch Crafstman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter

tails, three gable

support brackets Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

71 221 W. Avenue B Maria Caballero High House Sidewalks

Eastlake, Folk

Victorian

Hipped with flat

top creating

Mansard

appearance,

composition, gable

dormer Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung, aluminum

screens

Single door with

transom

72 228 W. Avenue B

Enemencio, Jr. and

Irma (trust) De

La Rosa Medium House Garage Sidewalks Crafstman Gable, composition Frame Wood siding

1, interior,

brick Double-hung Single door

73 224 W. Avenue B

Christopher J.

Tambunga Medium House Garage

Sidewalks,

trees Crafstman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

74 220 W. Avenue B

Justina and Lupe

G. Picon Medium House

Sidewalks,

walkway

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor,

Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

1,

exterior,

brick

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

75 216 W. Avenue B John M. Castillo Low House

Sidewalks,

fountain,

bricked

mailbox

Spanish

Eclectic Gable, composition Brick

1,

exterior,

brick Aluminum, fixed Single door

76 210 W. Avenue B

Daniel and Emma

Dominguez Medium

House/

Duplex Garage

Sidewalks,

walkway Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung Two single doors

77 208 W. Avenue B

Eugene and Bertha

Gonzalez Medium House Walkway Crafstman

Gable,

composition,

ornamental wood

work in gable

peaks Frame Wood siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

78 200 W. Avenue B

Mary Ellen C.

Zapata Medium House Garage Walkway Crafstman Gable, composition Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

79 203 W. Avenue A Rogelio Bermea Medium House Gardens Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

brackets Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

80 205 W. Avenue A Donna K. Kourelis Medium House Shed

Sidewalks,

gardens Ranch

Hipped,

composition, deep

eaves Frame Brick veneer

Double-hung,

casement Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

81

207 -

209 W. Avenue A

Lance R. and

Kathleen F. Carrico High House Garage

Sidewalks,

walkway

Spanish

Eclectic Flat with parapet Frame Brick veneer

Wood, double-

hung Single door

82

215-

217 W. Avenue A Patricia A. Quale Medium

House/

Duplex Garage

Chain link

fence Crafstman Gable, composition Frame Wood siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Two single doors

83 223 W. Avenue A Ruth Adams Medium House Garage Walkway Crafstman

Hipped,

composition Frame Wood siding Vinyl, double-hung Single door

84 227 W. Avenue A

Carlos and Sonia

Martinez Medium House Garage Gardens

Mission

Revival Flat with parapet Frame Stucco

1, interior,

brick

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

85 122 W. Avenue A Mayfield Paper Co. High

Three part

Industrial/

Commercial

building side-

by-side

Sidewalks, no

setbacks Commercial

Flat with

stairstepped

parapets

Middle

building:

brick-faced

tile curtain

walls, steel

trusses;

Other two:

brick Brick All boarded up

All boarded up

except one

86 423 S. Irving Thomas Sinsel Medium

Commercial

building Drive, parking

Post-War

Modern Flat with parapet CMU Stone front Aluminum, fixed Single door

87 427 S. Irving

W.B. (III) and

Janice Y. Farris Low

Commercial

building Commercial Flat with parapet CMU

Brick, metal

(corrugated)

1, wood, double-

hung

Single door,

loading door

88 501 S. Irving

Goodyear Tire

Co.

Williams/Villareal,

L.P. Low

Commercial

building Drive, parking Commercial Flat CMU

CMU, brick

below Aluminum, fixed

Single door,

south elevation;

6 garage doors

89

123-

125 W. Avenue A

Ethal Alberta

Spence Medium House/ Duplex Sidewalks

Craftsman/

Tudor Revival

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Brick Brick

2, interior,

brick

Aluminum, double-

hung Two single doors

90 123 W. Avenue A Noemi M. Salinas Medium House Sidewalks Craftsman

Gable with cross

gables,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Brick Brick

Wood, double-

hung Single door

91 126 W. Avenue B

Jesse R. and Lucy

Zapata Medium House Garage

Privacy trellis

on porch

Minimal

Traditional

Hipped,

composition, gable

dormer Frame

Asbestos

siding Double-hung Single door

92 124 W. Avenue B

Ramon E. and

Maricela D.

Vasquez Medium House Garage and shed Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

brackets in front

gable; second-

story rear addition-

hipped roof,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding Double-hung Single door

93

118-

120 W. Avenue B

Jesus, Jr. and

Fabiola Ordaz Medium House/ Duplex Garage

Wood fence in

rear Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

corner brackets in

front gable Frame

Asbestos

siding

Wood, double-

hung Two single doors

94 116 W. Avenue B Jesus Ordaz, Jr. Low House Craftsman Gable, composition Frame

Vertical

Hardee plank

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

95

110-

112 W. Avenue B

Eva Villareal

Arreola Medium House/ Duplex

Sidewalks,

picket fence,

privacy trellis

on front porch Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

double clipped

cross gables,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Vertical

wood siding Double-hung Two single doors

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

96

106-

108 W. Avenue B

Pamela Avey

Underwood High House/ Duplex

Sidewalks,

picket fence Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

double clipped

cross gables,

exposed rafter tails Frame Vinyl siding

Wood, double-

hung, aluminum

screens Two single doors

97

102-

104 W. Avenue B

Pamela Avey

Underwood High House/ Duplex

Sidewalks,

picket fence Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

double clipped

cross gables,

exposed rafter tails Frame Vinyl siding

Wood, double-

hung, aluminum

screens Two single doors

98 115 W. Avenue B

Jesus, Sr., and

Juanita Ordaz High House

Sidewalks,

walkway,

concrete ribbon

driveway Craftsman

Gable,

composition, gable

dormer, brackets,

dentils, exposed

rafter tails Frame Wood siding

1,

exterior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung, 1/1 Single door

99 119 W. Avenue B Patricia A. Quale High House Shed, carport

Sidewalks,

walkway,

concrete ribbon

driveway Craftsman

Gable,

composition, gable

dormer, brackets,

dentils, exposed

rafter tails Frame Wood siding

2,

exterior,

brick and

interior

brick

Wood, metal,

double-hung, 6/6

in front

Single door,

decorative

shutters

100 121 W. Avenue B Judy J. White Low House

Sidewalks,

walkway, chain

link fence

Folk, gable-

front-and wing Gable, composition Frame

Brick front,

asbestos

siding on

sides

1,

exterior,

brick

Aluminum, double-

hung and fixed Single door

101 127 W. Avenue B Patricia A. Quale High House

Brick garage--

400 square feet

Sidewalks,

terracing,

drives, nice

gardens Tudor Revival

Hipped, pyrimidal,

composition Frame

Brick veneer,

painted

1,

exterior,

brick

Vinyl, double-

hung, closed wood

shutters in front Single door

102

126-

128 W. Avenue C

Joe and Lois

Gonzales Low House Apart- ment

Walkway, wood

privacy fence

in rear Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Metal siding

above, brick

skirting

below

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

103 118 W. Avenue C

Magdalena H.

Medina Low House Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

Wood, aluminum,

double-hung Single door

104 116 W. Avenue C

Domingo and

Rosalina Martinez Low House Apart- ment

Chain link

fence Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

1,

exterior,

brick, east

elevation

Wood, aluminum,

double-hung

Single door,

sliding door west

elevation

105 621 S. Irving David Jensen High

House,Multi-

family

apartments

Walkway,

parking in rear,

several

mailboxs, wood

handicapped

ramp Prarie Flat, mansard Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung

Single door with

transom

106 701 S. Irving

Southwest

Airgas,

Inc./Welding

Supply

Lonestar Airgas,

Inc. High

Commercial

building with

Art Deco Neon

Sign, "Welding

Supply" Shed

Sidewalks,

drives,

walkway,

ramp, free-

standing pole

sign

Art

Deco/commer

cial Flate with parapet CMU

Stucco front,

CMU sides

and back

Aluminum, fixed,

iron bars

Single door,

garage door

107 125 W. Avenue C

Beatrice Enriquez

and Elizabeth

Gomez High House

2 sheds, one is 2-

story brick

veneer

Sidewalks,

garden,

concrete ribbon

driveway

Mission

Revival Flat with parapet Frame Brick veneer

2, interior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung; vents above

with ironwork; 3-

window bay on

front (north

elevation), topped

by stone relief

arch

Single door,

arched entry,

iron security

door

108 127 W. Avenue C Antonia Oliveda Medium House Shed

Sidewalks,

drives, outside

covered patio

Minimal

Traditional Gable, composition Frame

Asbestos

siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

109 722 S. Hill Medium House Dog house

Chain link

fence

Folk, shotgun;

Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Vertical

siding Double-hung Single door

110 126 W. Avenue D Josie H. Chavis Low House

Sidewalks,

drives Folk, shotgun Gable, composition Frame

Asbestos

siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

111 122 W. Avenue D Brandie Camarillo Low House

Small out-

building/cellar

Sidewalks,

chain link fence Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding Aluminum, sliding Two single doors

112 112 W. Avenue D

Tony E. and Eva

Flores Medium House Drives Prarie

Gable, metal,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Wood siding,

front or

south

elevation;

metal siding,

east and

north

elevation

Wood, double-

hung Single door

113 715 S. Irving Johnny Andrade Low

Commercial

building Metal fence Commercial Flat with parapet CMU

Paint over

CMUs

Metal, metal

awning

Single door, two

garage doors

114 108 W. Hardeman Pass James D. Baca Low

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

parking lot Commercial Flat with parapet Brick/ CMU

Stucco,

metal Aluminum, fixed

Five single

doors,four

garage doors

115

114-

118 W. Washington James D. Baca Low

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

parking lot Commercial

Flat with parapet,

stair-stepped on

east elevation CMU Stucco

Aluminum, fixed,

metal awning

Three single

doors

116 128 W. Washington

Kent Elliott

Roofing

Kenley Stafford

Dolliver Low

Commercial

building Parking lot Commercial Flat with parapet Brick/ CMU

Stucco,

metal Aluminum, fixed Single door

117 127 W. Avenue D Cool Cars

Kenley Stafford

Dolliver Low

Commercial

building Shed Parking lot Commercial Flat with parapet Brick Brick/CMU Metal, fixed

Single door, two

garage doors

118 26 W. Washington

Daniel's

Insulation

Jesse R. and

Lucinda Zapata Low

Commercial

building

Railroad spur

line behind Commercial Gable, metal Frame Metal

Single door with

sidelights

119 811 S. Chadbourne Juan F. Perez High

Commercial

building Shed

Freestanding

1950s neon

sign;

freestanding

car park cover,

flat roof, metal

poles Moderne Flat with parapet CMU

Brick and

stucco

Fixed, glass block

and oval Single door

121 805 S. Chadbourne

Lane Weathermart

Inc. High

Commercial

building

Railroad spur

line Moderne Flat with parapet

Concrete

block, steel

trusses Brick

Steel, casement

and fixed

Single door with

entryway,

garage door

122 703 S. Chadbourne

San Angelo

Railway Museum City of San Angelo x x High Railroad Depot

iron fence

parking,

benches

Romanesque,

Spanish

Eclectic

Hipped, tile, off-

center tower Brick Brick 3

Wood, double-

hung, 12/1 on

second floor, stone

lintels and sills

South elev-- one

double door, 2

single doors, all

with sidelights

and transoms;

west elev--one

single door with

sidelights and

transom

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

123 624 S. Irving

Billy Louis and

Billie Faye Sawyer Medium

Commercial

building Commercial Flat with parapet Stucco/tile

Steel, casement

and fixed 3 garage doors

124

641-

643 S. Chadbourne

Hospice of San

Angelo/America's

Attic Pawn Shop

Robert N. William

C. (III) Kile Low

Commercial

building Sidewalks Commercial Flat with parapet Brick

Stucco, brick

below

windows Aluminum, fixed

2 Single doors

with sidelights

and transom

125 639 S. Chadbourne

North half of

America's Attic

Pawn Shop

Oneita Fay Smith

Burgess

Medium

(north

end of

business)

Commercial

building Sidewalks Commercial Flat with parapet Brick

Brick above,

metal

covering on

most of

façade

1, brick

and

stuccoed

Enclosed behind

metal façade Single door

126

615-

617 S. Chadbourne Gun Shop Jessie R. Smith Low

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

drives Commercial Flat with parapet Brick Brick

Fixed, aluminum,

bars Two single doors

127 609 S. Chadbourne

Linda Torres

Martinez High

Commercial

building Sidewalks Moderne

Flat with parapet,

stair-stepped

receded parapet,

stair-stepped

Concrete

block,

wood

trusses

Stucco and

tile

1, concave

with ticket

window Enclosed Two single doors

128 605 S. Chadbourne

Crazy Goat

Sports Bar and

Grill

Juan H. and Anita

C. Fernandez Medium

Commercial

building Sidewalks Art Deco Flat with parapet Brick Stucco

2, one on

north half is

enclosed Fixed Single door

129 603 S. Chadbourne Belinda F. Bega Medium

Commercial

building Sidewalks Pueblo Revival

Flat with parapet;

vigas within relief

arches just below

roof line Brick Brick and tile

2, transoms

filled in Aluminum, fixed Single door

130 606 S. Irving Gunter Wholesale

Gunter Wholesale,

Inc. High

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

parking lot,

concrete steps

Moderne,

International Flat with parapet Masonry

Stone above,

brick below

Casement,

horizontal band

Single door with

transom and one

sidelight

131 14 W. Avenue B RMI, Inc.

Robert and

Maurietta Madden Medium

Commercial

building Two garages Sidewalks

Post-War

Modern Flat with parapet Brick Brick Aluminum, fixed

Double door with

transom and

sidelights

132 505 S. Chadbourne

Texas

Department of

Public Safety State of Texas Medium

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

parking lot Art Deco Flat with parapet

CMU with

pilastered

walls Brick

3 single doors,

two with

transom and one

sidelight

133 421 S. Chadbourne FL's Gardens

Poncho's of San

Angelo Medium

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

parking lot Moderne Flat with parapet Stucco

Aluminum, fixed

on west elevation;

large round fixed

porthole window

with wood frame

on east elevation

Double door

entry in round,

glass block

entryway on

west elevation

134 434 S. Irving

The

Registry/Griffin

Interiors Fred L. Griffin High

Commercial

building Parking lot

Post-War

Modern;

International

Shed on east, flat

on west Brick Stucco Aluminum, fixed Double door

135 22 E. Avenue A River Stage City of San Angelo Medium

Park/Entertain-

ment venue

Concession

stand, rest-

rooms

Park setting

along river

bank Shed Brick

Brick and

metal

136 22 E. Avenue A

Municipal

Swimming Pool City of San Angelo x x x High

Park/Entertain-

ment venue

Chemical

storage shed

Park setting

along river

bank, chain

link fence, rock

walls Pueblo Revival

Flat with parapet,

hipped,

composition--

pyrimidal with

exposed rafter tails Stone Stucco, vigas

Metal, casement

with transoms Double door

137 15 E. Avenue A

Steve and Joe

Kollmyer x Low

Metal

Industrial

building

Set back from

Ave A along

alley, chain link

fence Commercial

Shallow gable,

metal

Metal above,

Stucco below

Single door, 2

garage doors

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

138 502 S. Chadbourne David Mazur x High Restaurant

Set at angle to

road, drives,

parking,

gardens, palm

trees

Post-War

Modern

Gable,

composition, three

cross gables in

front CMU Stucco

Wood, fixed, three

large ovals, front

projecting bay,

cloth awnings

Single door with

transom

139 506 S. Chadbourne David Mazur x High

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

masonry wall

connecting it to

502 S.

Chadbourne Art Deco

Flat with parapet,

two Art Deco

corners Brick Brick

3-bay

concave

entry with

transom Wood, fixed

Single door with

transom

140 508 S. Chadbourne William Paschal, Jr. x x High

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

unpaved alley

to north, no

setback Commercial

Flat with

stairstepped

parapet, recessed

band for signage

on front Brick Brick

3-bay entry

with

enclosed

transom Aluminum, fixed

Double door with

transom

141 510 S. Chadbourne William Paschal, Jr. x x High

Commercial

building

Sidewalks, no

setback Commercial

Flat with parapet,

three pilasters that

extend above roof

line Brick Brick

3-bay entry

with

enclosed

transom Wood, fixed Double door

142 512 S. Chadbourne William Paschal, Jr. x x High

Commercial

building

Sidewalks, no

setback Commercial

Flat with

stairstepped

parapet, recessed

band for signage

on front

Reinforced

concrete Brick

3-bay

concave

entry with

transom,

stone or

concrete

band above Wood, fixed Double door

143

516-

522 S. Chadbourne

Robert E. and

Karen K. Brest x x High

Two block

Commercial

building

Sidewalks, no

setback Commercial

Flat with parapet,

pressed brick

cornice Brick Brick 3

Open or boarded

over; stone lintels

and sills

Three single

doors, boarded

over

144 14 E. Avenue B

Steve and Joe

Kollmyer x Low

Commercial

building

Parking in

front, unpaved

alley to west,

chain link fence

and storage

yard to east Commercial

Shallow gable,

metal

Stone in

front, stucco

other 4, recessed Aluminum, fixed

Single door with

transom and one

sidelight

146 11 E. Avenue B City of San Angelo Low

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

parking lot Commercial

Flat with stuccoed,

stairstepped

parapet

Concrete

frame, CMU

curtain

walls, wood

trusses Metal Wood, fixed

Single door with

sidelights,

garage door

147 618 S. Chadbourne 618 Station City of San Angelo High

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

parking lot Mission

Flat with Mission-

shaped parapet

and corners, tile

Concrete,

iron posts

and

pilasters Brick veneer 6

Fixed with

transoms,

limestone lintels

south elevation,

continuous metal

canopy

3 single doors

with transoms,

west elevation;

1 single door

with transom,

south elevation

148 702 S. Chadbourne

Senior Citizens

Center/ Santa Fe

Crossing City of San Angelo x x High

Railroad

freight depot

Sidewalks,

parking lot

Spanish

Eclectic,

Romanesque Gable, tile

Brick, west

end; frame

warehouse,

east

Brick, west

end two-

story office;

brick veneer,

east end;

wood siding

between on

warehouse

1, interior

in brick

office on

west end

Wood, double-

hung; limestone

lintels with

keystones

Double-door;

several loading

dock doors

149 34 E. Avenue D.

Los Panchitos

Restaurant City of San Angelo Medium

Commercial

building

Decorative

walks and

landscaping

Spanish

Eclectic,

Mission Hipped, metal Frame Brick, stucco Fixed

Double-door

with sidelights

150 52 E. Avenue D.

El Paseo de

Santa Angela

Pavilion West City of San Angelo Medium Park pavilion

Decorative

walks and

landscaping

Spanish

Eclectic,

Mission Hipped, metal

Frame,

metal

Stucco,

stone Wood Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

151 23 E. Avenue D. Tim Stiles Low

Industrial

building Commercial Flat with parapet Brick Brick

Fixed, many

boarded up Single door

152 15 E. Avenue D.

Richard C. and

Mary Edna

Stoebner Low

Commercial

building Parking lot Commercial Flat Metal Metal Fixed Single door

153

802-

804 S. Chadbourne Angelo Brake Co. Richard Hartgrove Low

Commercial

building Parking lot Commercial Gable, metal Metal Metal Single door

154

808-

814 S. Chadbourne

World Finance

South

Kenneth S. Gunter

Revocable Trust Medium

Commercial

building Old railroad car

Gardens,

parking lot Commercial Flat with parapet Clay tile Stucco Aluminum, fixed

Single door with

sidelights

155 18 E. Washington Austin Body Shop

Terry D. and Debra

G. Butler Low

Commercial

building

Parking lot,

chain link fence Commercial Gable, metal Metal Metal Single door

156 66 E. Avenue D

El Paseo De

Santa Angela

Pavilion East City of San Angelo Medium Park pavilion

Decorative

walks and

landscaping;

metal buffalo

scuptures

Spanish

Eclectic,

Mission Hipped, metal

Frame,

metal

Stucco,

stone

Wood, double-

hung on second

floor

Single door with

sidelights

157 72 E. Avenue D

City Cabinet

Shop

Sinclair Family

Trust Low

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

drive Commercial Gable, metal Metal Metal Fixed Single door

158 721 S. Oakes City of San Angelo Medium

Commercial

building Sidewalks Art Deco Flat with parapet Brick Brick Fixed metal Double door

159 713 S. Oakes

Riddle Electric

Motor City of San Angelo Low

Commercial

building Sidewalks Commercial Flat with parapet Brick Brick Fixed

2 single doors,

north one with

sidelights,

garage door

160 602 S. Orient Baker Building City of San Angelo x High

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

gardens Italianate

Gable, metal, with

parapets on east

and west

elevations

Stucco, cast-

iron

storefront 3 Wood

Double door with

transom and

sidelights

161 528 S. Orient Hartgrove House City of San Angelo x High Frame House

Sidewalks,

gardens Queen Anne

Hipped with cross

gables,

composition; metal

on pyrimidal roof

on porch Frame

Wood siding

and wood

shingles on

porch

1, interior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung; front bay

has leaded

transoms

Single door with

transom and

sidelights

162 520 S. Orient Camunez Grocery City of San Angelo x High

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

gardens Commercial Flat with parapet Frame

Shiplap wood

siding 3

Wood, double-

hung Single door

163 512 S. Orient Zenker House City of San Angelo x High Frame House

Sidewalks,

gardens Queen Anne

Hipped,

composition, gable

dormers Frame

Wood siding,

wood

shingles in

front gables

Wood, double-

hung

Single door with

transom

164 502 S. Orient Bunk House City of San Angelo x High Frame Houe

Sidewalks,

gardens

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor Gable, composition Frame

Shiplap wood

siding, wood

shingles in

gables 3

Wood, double-

hung

Single door with

transom

165 1 Love

San Angelo

Museum of Fine

Arts

San Angelo

Museum of Fine

Arts x Medium Art Museum

Terracing,

gardens,

pedestrian

bridge across

river, windmill,

4 sculptures,

rock wall Contemporary

Metal, flat with

parapet and

curved Stone

Stone and

brick Wood, fixed

Double door with

transom and

sidelights

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

166 455 S. Oakes Banner Creamery

Jesse R. and

Lucinda Zapata x High

Industrial

building

Sidewalks,

metal fence in

rear Moderne

Flat with parapet;

black tile wraps

around building in

horizontal lines

near roof--tile

painted over in

June 2011

Tile and

steel

girders Stucco Steel, casement

167 433 S. Oakes

San Angelo

Museum of Fine

Arts x High Service Station

Art Deco,

Mission

Flat with parapet,

tile Stucco

Single door,

garage door

168 427 S. Oakes

San Angelo

Museum of Fine

Arts x Medium

Commercial

building

Handicapped

ramp, south

elevation Commercial

Flat with parapet,

shed or mansard

overhang with tile CMU Brick

Wood, double-

hung, some are

boarded over

Single door,

garage door

169

423-

425 S. Oakes

San Angelo

Museum of Fine

Arts x Medium

Commercial

building Sidewalks Commercial

Flat with parapet,

fabric awning Stucco Wood, fixed Double door

170 421 S. Oakes

San Angelo

Museum of Fine

Arts x Medium

Commercial

building Sidewalks Commercial

Flat with parapet,

fabric awning Brick Stucco

Vinyl, double-

hung, 6/6 Single door

171 417 S. Oakes

San Angelo

Museum of Fine

Arts x High

Commercial

building Sidewalks Moderne Flat with parapet Brick

Stucco, tile

and block

3 (concave

entry) Aluminum, fixed

Single door with

one sidelight

172 S. Oakes Bridge High Bridge Art Deco

Washed

concrete--

six sets of

concrete

pilings in

river

Small arched

openings in

concrete

guardrails;

arcaded drop

below road

surface

toward river;

deco relief

features on

railing posts

173 350 S. Oakes Troy Laundry Gary M. Kerley High

Commercial

building

Sidewalks; Two

Deco/Moderne

signs: one

neon-type

hanging

perpendicular

to building,

another

mounted flat

on building

front Moderne Flat with parapet

Tile with

wood posts Brick veneer

Smoke-

stack

Aluminum, double-

hung; some

boarded up

Single door with

transom and

sidelights

174 116 Allen Harrison Roofing

O.D. (III) and

Ronny Harrison Low

Commercial

building Drives Commercial

Flat with parapet,

stair-stepped on

east addition, east

elevation Brick

Brick, stucco

on east

addition Double-hung

Single door,

awning, garage

door

175 134 Allen

Donald and Norma

Gilman High House

Sidewalks,

gardens,

walkway Craftsman

Gable, clipped,

composition Frame

Metal or

vinyl siding

1,

exterior,

east, brick

Wood, double-

hung, multi-

vertical panes

above Single door

176 138 Allen

Donald and Norma

Gilman High House

Sidewalks,

terracing,

drives,

walkway Craftsman

Hipped, metal,

cross gable, corner

brackets, exposed

rafter tails Frame Brick veneer

1, interior,

west end wood, double-hung Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

177 140 Allen

Donald and Norma

Gilman x x High House

Old secondary

stucco

residence, used

to be carriage

house--mission

style with wood,

double-hung

windows, shed

roof with

exposed rafter

tails, wood

center door--342

square feet; and

a shed

Sidewalks,

terracing,

gardens,

walkway Prairie

Hipped, metal,

hipped doremers Brick Brick 3 1, interior

Wood, double-

hung

Single door with

sidelights

178 214 Allen

Guadalupe R. and

Erlinda M.

Rodriguez Medium House Garage

Terracing,

drives,

gardens,

cobblestone

garden wall,

walkway Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Metal siding

(?)

Wood, double-

hung; added

Palladian window

west elevation

Single door with

transom; single

door on added

second floor

179 Rio Concho Rio Concho Park City of San Angelo High

9-acre park

along south

side of river

and north side

of Rio Concho

Drive

Trees, river

reeds,

walking/joggin

g paved trails

along river,

benches

180 403 Rio Concho

Rio Concho

Manor

Rio Concho Manor,

Inc. High

10-story

retirement

center, west

wing

Patio homes,

maintenance

buildings,

administration

building,

carports

Gardens,

circular drive,

parking lots International Flat with parapet

Steel or

concrete

Brick, tile on

first floor

Aluminum, fixed

on lower floor,

ribbons of

casement windows

above

Double glass

door

181 401 Allen

Marilyn McEnrue

Taylor High House

Rural setting--

trees old rock

wall in back

yard, unpaved

drive

National Folk,

Hall-and-

Parlor;

Craftsman Gable, composition Frame Wood siding 3

1, interior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung, mostly

boarded up Single door

182 409 Allen Diane C. Hines Low House 3-door garage Walkway, drive No style Gable, composition Brick

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

183 345 Allen

Ruben and Diana

Cruz Low House Shed

Sidewalks, 2-

lane ribbon

drive,

walkway, chain

link fence Craftsman Gable, composition Frame

Brick,

vertical wood

siding on

front

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

184 341 Allen

Bertha Cabrales

Sanchez Medium House

Unpaved drive,

wlakway, palm

trees Craftsman

Hipped,

composition,

hipped dormers,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Concrete

siding above,

brick below

Wood, double-

hung, diamond

panes in upper

sashes; aluminum

storm windows Single door

185 333 Allen

Joe and Azalia

Chavarria Medium House

Terracing,

walkway, chain

link fence in

rear Craftsman Gable, composition Frame

Concrete

siding

Wood, double-

hung, diamond

panes in upper

sashes

186 329 Allen

Rhonda Gayle

Shrum, Atten: Opal

Hudson (life

estate) Medium House

Drive,

walkway, wood

handicapped

ramp front

Minimal

Traditional

Hipped,

composition Frame

Asbestos

siding on

top, wood on

bottom;

masonite on

rear

Vinyl, sliding;

decorative shutters Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

187 317 Allen

Steven and Dawn

Snyder High House Shed Drive, walkway Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter

tails, front gable

brackets Frame Brick veneer

2, interior,

brick Vinyl, double-hung Single door

188 311 Allen

Kevin Wayne &

Sherrie Snyder

Scott High House

Woodshop on

Webb St., metal

carport on east

side of house

Drives,

walkway Tudor Revival

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter

tails, two gable

dormers Frame

Stone with

brick trim

1,exterior,

stone with

brick trim

Aluminum, double-

hung, some

enclosed

189 303 Allen

Maria Castillo and

Maria Lowe Medium House

Shed,

foundation of

another

outbuilding in

rear

Walkway, chain

link fence Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Concrete

siding

Wood, double-

hung, aluminum

storm windows Single door

190 414 Webb Wilson Tire Wheel Low

Commercial

building

Metal building at

rear of property

Chain link

fence,

hundreds of

tires, and a

donkey Commercial

Gable, metal, and

flat with stair-

stepped parapet on

north end Brick

Brick, stucco

on north end

Single door,

garage loading

door

191 223 Bird Belia Fraire Medium House Garage in rear

Sidewalks,

walkway,

gardens Queen Anne

Hipped,

composition, cross

gable Frame Vinyl siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

192 221 Bird

Consuelo Herrera,

deceased, c/o

Robert Herrera Medium House

Sidewalks,

terracing,

walkway, two-

lane ribbon

driveway

Craftsman,

National Folk

shotgun

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Metal siding

Wood, double-

hung Two single doors

193 219 Bird Sylvia Tijerina High House

Sidewalks,

drive, gardens,

wood fences,

walkway

Craftsman,

National Folk

pyrimidal

Hipped,

composition,

flared; hipped

dormers, flared

and covered with

wood shingles Frame Wood siding

Wood and

aluminum, double-

hung; bay on west

elevation and cloth

awning on west

elevation Single door

194 217 Bird

Amelia G.

Gonzales, deceased High House

Sidewalks,

brick terracing,

walkway, old

wire fence

Craftsman,

National Folk

pyrimidal

First floor: hipped,

composition,

flared; 3 hipped,

flared dormers

covered in wood

shingles

Second floor:

gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

1, brick,

interior

Wood, double-

hung, some

windows have

original wood

screens, some

have aluminum

storms Single door

195 215 Bird Ramon Hernandez High House

Sidewalks,

walkway, chain

link fence

National Folk,

gable-front

and wing Gable, composition Frame

Metal siding,

fish-scale

wood

shingles in

front gable

Aluminum, double-

hung, fixed 3-bay

in front Two single doors

196 203 Bird

Edna Johnson

Meaux, deceased,

atten: Candy

Sedden Medium House Walkway

National Folk,

gable-front

and wing Gable, metal Frame

Vertical

metal on

gable front,

wood siding

on wing

Wood, double-

hung; gable front

window boarded

over with metal Two single doors

197 201 Bird

Neri D. Sosa,

attent: Margaret D.

Sosa Low House

Walkway, wood

fence in rear

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor Gable, composition Frame

Vinyl or

metal siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

199 206 Bird

Michael L. and

Debra Williams High House

Sidewalks,

drive,

walkway, chain

link fence Craftsman

Hipped,

composition,

flared; hipped

dormers, flared Frame Wood siding

1, interior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung

Single door with

transom

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

200 208 Bird

Jose I. and Rosie

Ornelas Medium House

Sidewalks,

walkway,

drive, iron

fence, hot tub Craftsman

Hipped,

composition, flared Frame

Vinyl or

metal siding

Aluminum, double-

hung, decorative

shutters front Single door

201 220 Bird

Jose Franco and

Julia Franco,

deceased High House Open shed

Sidewalks,

drives,

walkway, wood

fence in rear

Craftsman,

National Folk

pyrimidal

Hipped,

composition,

flared; 3 hipped

dormers, flared

and covered with

wood shingles Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung 2 single doors

202 224 Bird

Fernando M. and

Debbie Lara Medium House Walkway

Craftsman,

National Folk

pyrimidal

Hipped,

composition, flared Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung, one boarded

up, decorative

shutters Single door

203 228 Bird Irma L. Lopez High House

Walkway, chain

link fence side,

wood fence

rear Prairie

Hipped, 2 hipped

dormers, flared Frame Vinyl siding

1, interior,

brick

Aluminum, double-

hung

Single door with

transom and

sidelights

204 225 Allen Christopher J. Ortiz Medium House

Terracing,

cobblestone

wall, walkway,

chain link fence

front, wood

fence back,

flagpole

Craftsman,

National Folk

pyrimidal

Hipped,

composition,

hipped dormer

covered with

shingles, exposed

rafter tails Frame Wood siding

Aluminum, fixed

bay in front;

Wood, double-

hung on sides Single door

205 223 Allen Michael Velez High House

Terracing,

cobblestone

garden wall,

walkway Queen Anne

Hipped,

composition,

hipped dormers,

cross gables Frame

Wood siding,

fishscale

shingles in

gables

Wood, double-

hung, diamond

panes in upper

sashes; added

decorative

shutters; bay

window west

elevation

Single door with

transom

206 221 Allen

Courtney N. and

Tracy Ray Troup High House Shed

Terracing,

walkway,

concrete ribbon

driveway Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

1, interior,

brick; 1,

exterior,

brick, west

side,

Wood, double-

hung, 8/1 and 6/1;

decorative

screenwork;

aluminum or vinyl

storm windows

covering wood

windows Single door

207 215 Allen Joanne Carr Hayes Low House

Drive,

walkway, chain

link fence Ranch Gable, composition Frame Wood siding

Aluminum, fixed,

decorative shutters Single door

208 203 Allen

Donald and Norma

Gilman High House

Terracing,

drive,

cobblestone

wall, walkway Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Wood siding,

stucco below

1, interior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung; window in

front gable

supported by

brackets and

covered with

shutters; three-

bay west elevation Single door

209 402 Porter

Esther Mata and

Rodolfo Alveraz Medium House Shed

Drive, chain

link fence Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung, aluminum

storm windows Single door

210 408 Porter Jean Bundrant Medium House

Two sheds, one

connected to

410 Porter

Terracing,

drive, walkway Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter

tails, brackets

under gable ends Frame Wood siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

211 411 Porter Guadalupe Rosas Medium House Drive, walkway Queen Anne

Hipped,

composition, cross

gable Frame

Wood siding,

fishscale

shingles in

gables Vinyl, double-hung

Three single

doors

212 123 Allen

Jesse R. and

Lucinda Zapata High House

Sidewalks,

walkway, chain

link fence, old

rock wall Queen Anne

Hipped,

composition, cross

gables Frame

Wood siding,

fishscale

shingles in

gables 1, interior

Double-hung, side

bays with 3

windows

Two single doors

with transoms

213 121 Allen

Jesse R. and

Lucinda Zapata Medium House

Sidewalks,

walkway, chain

link fence Craftsman Gable, composition Frame Wood siding 1, interior

Double-hung,

metal screens

Two single

doors, one with

enclosed

transom (facing

north)

214 105 Allen

Concho Christmas

Warehouse, LLC Low

Commercial

building

Drives, chain

link fence on

west Mission

Flat with

stairstepped

parapet Brick Stucco 1 fixed Single door

215 408 S. Oakes KKH Propeties, LLC Medium

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

parking at front

and sides Mission

Flat with parapet,

brickwork cornice

Brick, wood

posts

Brick, wood

enclosing

windows and

storefront

bay

Boarded up, 3

arched, outlined in

brick and enclosed

Two single

doors, two

loading or

garage doors

216

416--

418 S. Oakes KKH Propeties, LLC Low

Commercial

buildings Sidewalks Commercial Flat with parapet

Brick,

metal Brick, metal Aluminum, fixed

Two single

doors, one with

transom

217 120 Bird Wanda J. Pedigo High House

Drive, brick-

lined walkway Queen Anne

Hipped,

composition, cross

gables Frame

Wide wood

siding or

concrete

siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

218 124 Bird Rosa Mejia Low House Shed in rear

Circular drive,

chain link fence No style

Hipped,

composition Frame

Brick façade

(south

elevation)

and east

elevation;

vertical wood

siding

Aluminum, double-

hung

Single door with

sidelights

219 132 Bird Guadalupe Rosas High House Shed in rear Drive, walkway Queen Anne

Hipped,

composition, gable

dormers, cross

gables Frame

Metal siding

over wood

1, interior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung Two single doors

220 117 Bird

Bristoe Real Estate

Co., Ltd. Low

Commercial

building

Shed along back

of west side of

property

Chain link

fence Commercial

Gable, tar paper,

wood shingles on

porch Frame

Corrugated

metal, wood

siding on

front

2 large

metal

vents Single door

221 504 S. Oakes

Lamar Outdoor

Advertising Low

Commercial

building Commercial Gable, metal

Concrete,

wood posts

Brick

covered with

metal on

west and

northwest

and stucco

on south and

southwest

4 large

roof vents

1 window--

aluminum, double-

hung

Single door, 3

loading doors

222 325 Rust

Juan (deceased)

and Analda Mesa High House

Garage with

apartment

Terracing,

unpaved drive,

chain link fence

in front Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Stone and

petrified

wood veneer

Wood, double-

hung Single door

223 421 Rust Steve Schlittler Medium House

Outbuilding,

apartment--

stucco, tile roof,

792 square feet;

carport with tile

roof

Sidewalks,

drive,

walkway,

stucco walls Craftsman Gable Frame Stucco

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

224 423 Rust Adrian Ordaz Medium House

Wood fence in

rear Craftsman

Hipped,

composition, cross

gable Frame

Vertical

wood siding

Aluminum, double-

hung; fixed bay Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

225 427 Rust Steve Schlittler Medium House

Terracing,

metal fence in

rear

Craftsman;

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor

Gable, metal,

gable dormer Frame Wood siding

Aluminum, double-

hung; altered,

possibly enlarged

Single door with

transom and

sidelights

226 429 Baker

Charles L.

Millspaugh Low House

Drive, gravel

yard, chain link

fence Craftsman Gable, metal Brick

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

227 420 Baker

Kenneth Duane

Hamblin Low House

Unpaved

ribbon drive

Craftsman;

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Vinyl siding Vinyl, double-hung Single door

228 418 Baker Mary Jane Kiefer Low House

Paved ribbon

drive, walkway Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Asbestos

siding,

vertical wood

boards

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

229 416 Baker Mary Jane Kiefer Low House Garage

Sidewalks,

walkway, chain

link fence in

rear Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Asbestos

siding

Aluminum, double-

hung, decorative

shutters front Single door

230 412 Baker

Richard J. and

Tammy K. Fuson Medium House

Sidewalks,

unpaved ribbon

drive, chain

link fence rear,

walkway Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Asbestos

siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

231 410 Baker Ofelia R. Iberra High Boy Scout Hut

Wood fence

rear, unpaved

parking

Craftsman,

Minimal

Traditional Gable, composition Frame

Concrete

siding

Wood and vinyl,

double-hung Two single doors

232

Rust/Allen Railroad

Bridge Medium

Railroad

Bridge

Concrete,

wood, old

rock

approaches

on west

elevation

233 403 Baker Tonie P. Moya Low House

Drive, chain

link fence

National Folk,

pyrimidal

Hipped,

composition Frame

Asbestos

siding

Aluminum, double-

hung; fixed front

bay Single door

234 405 Baker

Araceli Calderon

and Juan A.

Rodriguez Medium House Shed

Sidewalks,

wood fence in

rear, walkway Queen Anne

Hipped,

composition, cross

gable Frame

Asbestos or

concrete

siding,

fishscale

shingles in

front gable

Wood, double-

hung (front

window looks too

short and like it's a

new vinyl window) Single door

235 411 Baker

W.H. Boyd,

deceased Medium House Shed

Sidewalks,

walkway, chain

link fence

Craftsman,

National Folk

shotgun

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Concrete

siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Two single doors

236 413 Baker

Dorothy W.

Kozelsky Medium House Garage

Sidewalks,

drive, walkway Craftsman

Hipped,

composition, cross

gables Frame

Asbestos

siding

Wood, double-

hung, aluminum

storms Two single doors

237 417 Baker

Michael and Debra

Neeley Medium House Garage

Drives, chain

link fence Craftsman Gable, composition Frame Vinyl siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

238 423 Baker Rachel Franklin Medium House Garage

Drive,

walkway, chain

link fence Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood siding

1,

exterior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung Single door

239 427 Baker

Joe R. and Beatrice

Nava Medium House

Sidewalks,

concrete ribbon

driveway,

walkway, chain

link fence Ranch

Hipped,

composition CMU

Stucco,

concrete

siding

Vinyl, double-

hung, decorative

shutters Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

240 429 Baker Robert E. Dillard Medium House Garage

Concrete

ribbon drive,

well/cistern,

gardens,

walkway, cedar

post fence

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor Gable, composition Frame

Concrete

siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

241 515 Rust

KCE Partnership,

Atten: Mark E.

Blackwell Medium House

Attached

carport, north

elevation

Drive,

walkway,

picket fence

National Folk,

shotgun Gable, composition Frame

Concrete

siding

Vinyl, double-

hung, decorative

shutters that are

too short Single door

242 400 E. Avenue A

Tom Green

County Shop Tom Green County Low

Government

Service

Building

Two sheds, one

CMU, one metal

Work yard,

chain link

fence, two gas

pumps west

elevation Commercial Flat CMU

Painted

CMUs Aluminum, fixed

Three single

doors; four

loading doors on

east elevation;

two loading

doors, west

elevation

243 415 E. Avenue A

Joe B. Blakeney

Wool Warehouse

Robert Lovelace

and E.A. Janek Medium Warehouse Drives Commercial

Gable, metal,

collapsed

Brick, brick

buttresses,

west

elevation Brick Loading door

244 701 Rust

Santa Rita Wool

Warehouse

W.B. (Jr.) and Sara

L. Demoville Low Warehouse

Parking on

Rust Commercial Flat with parapet

CMU, wood

posts Metal

Two single doors

and one loading

door on East

Avenue C

245 709 Rust Sea Arrow, Inc. Robert W. Lovelace Low

Commercial

building

Drive, garden,

rock border Commercial Flat with parapet Brick Brick

Metal, fixed; glass

block above

Single door,

garage door

246

715-

717 Rust

Billie Hanks

Enterprises

Billie Hanks, Sr.

Trust Medium Warehouse Shed Drive Commercial

Gable, metal,

exposed rafter tails CMU CMU

Wood, aluminum,

fixed

Single door,

garage door on

east elevation,

loading doors

south elevation

247 723 Rust

Texas Truck

Repair

Billie Hanks, Sr.

Trust Medium Warehouse

Drives, two old

signs Commercial Gable, metal Frame

Stucco front

(east

elevation);

metal Wood, fixed

Single door,

loading doors

north elevation

248 417 E. Avenue D

John W. O'Banion,

Jr. High

Large

Commercial/

Industrial

building (Motor

Frieght

Station)

Moderne,

Commercial

Flat with

stairstepped

parapet, highest

on corner;

concrete roof on

steel joists

Concrete

frame, CMU

curtain

walls

Stucco front,

brick other Metal, casement

Single door,

large metal

window above,

deepset and

outlined

249 803 Rust

Christian Service

Station

Johnson Street

Church of Christ Low

Commercial

building/ware-

house

Concrete

handicapped

ramp Commercial Flat with parapet Brick

Brick rear

(west);

metal front

(east) Two single doors

250 114 E. Washington

Obdulia Juarez,

deceased, Atten:

Sylvia Alvarado Low House Shed

Chain link

fence Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter

tails, gable

dormer Frame

Concrete

siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

251 134 Henry O. Flipper City of San Angelo High

Two-lot

commercial

building

Sidewalks,

loading

platforms east

and west

elevations,

parking on

west Commercial Flat with parapet

Brick-faced

tile, wood

and iron

posts Brick

Metal, double-

hung, bars over

windows Double-door

253 305 Baker

San Angelo ISD

Warehouse San Angelo ISD Low Warehouse

Large metal

building to east

Parking,

storage yard,

chain link fence Commercial

Gable,

composition,

stairstepped

parapet at front

(north elevation)

Pre-cast

concrete

front, metal

elsewhere Fixed

Single door,

Loading door

and loading dock

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

254 630 S. Oakes

Stables

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Old warehouses

that have been

updated to west

and east,

connected

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River US Military Flat with parapet

Stone,

upper;

brick, lower

Stone,

upper; brick

lower

Boarded up with

wood shutters Open door

255 630 S. Oakes

Enlisted Men's

Barracks 5

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Non-contributing

public restrooms

in rear--north

side

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River US Military

Hipped, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

1, roof

ridge

ventilator

Wood, double-

hung, 9/9 Single door

256 630 S. Oakes

Enlisted Men's

Barracks 6

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Powder

magazine to the

rear--north side--

it was moved to

this site from its

original location

outside the fort

property

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River US Military

Hipped, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

1, roof

ridge

ventilator

Wood, double-

hung Single door

257 630 S. Oakes

Commissary

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River --Wood

rail fence US Military

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

Wood, double-

hung; fixed in

front; 6/6 on sides

Single door with

transom

258 630 S. Oakes

Quartermaster

Storehouse

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River--wood

rail fence,

unpaved

walkway US Military

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

Wood, double-

hung; small fixed

in front; 6/6 on

sides

Single door with

transom

259 630 S. Oakes

City storehouse

behind

Quartermaster

Storehouse

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo Low Warehouse Commercial Flat, shed Stucco Single door

260 630 S. Oakes

Headquarters

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Non-contributing

restrooms in

rear--east side

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River US Military

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

4, interior,

brick

Wood, double-

hung, 9/9 on first

floor, 6/6 on

second; stone

lintels Single door

261 630 S. Oakes

Oscar Ruffini

Home/Office

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River No style

Gable, wood

shingles, parapet Frame

Vertical

wood planks Boarded up

Single door with

transom

262 630 S. Oakes

Hospital

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Small

tubercolosis

sanitorium for

exhibit, not

originally located

at fort--behind

northeast end of

hospital

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River

US Military

standard in

1867

Hipped, wood

shingles, center

belvedere Hadite tile Stone 5, interior

Wood, double-

hung

Single door with

transom

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

263 630 S. Oakes

Chapel

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Two storm

cellars, south

elevation

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River US Military

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

Wood, double-

hung, 9/9, stone

lintels

Double-door

with transom

264 630 S. Oakes

Officer's Quarters

No. 9

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor house

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone 2, stone

Wood, double-

hung, 9/9

Double-door

with transom

265 630 S. Oakes

Officer's Quarters

No. 8

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor house

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

3, interior,

stone

Wood, double-

hung, functional

shutters Double-door

266 630 S. Oakes

Officer's Quarters

No. 7

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor house/

duplex

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

3, interior,

stone

Wood, double-

hung, 9/9 on front

1st floor, 6/6 sides

and rear,

functional shutters

1st floor

Two single doors

with transoms

267 630 S. Oakes

Officer's Quarters

No. 6

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor house

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

3, interior,

stone

Wood, double-

hung, 9/9 Single door

268 630 S. Oakes

Officer's Quarters

No. 5

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

ruin

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River

Remains of

limestone

walls on

ground

269 630 S. Oakes

Officer's Quarters

No. 4

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor house

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

3, interior,

stone

Wood, double-

hung, stone lintels,

functional shutters Single door

270 630 S. Oakes

Officer's Quarters

No. 3

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor house

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

4, interior,

stone

Wood, double-

hung, 9/9 Single door

271 630 S. Oakes

Officer's Quarters

No. 2

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor house

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

3, interior,

stone

Wood, double-

hung, 9/9,

functional shutters Single door

272 630 S. Oakes

Officer's Quarters

No. 1

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor house

Gable, wood

shingles

Solid stone,

18-inches

thick Stone

4, interior,

stone, on

ends, east

and west

Wood, double-

hung, 9/9,

functional shutters Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

273 630 S. Oakes

Enlisted Men's

Barracks 1

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River US Military

Hipped, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

2 roof

ridge

vents

Wood, double-

hung, 6/6

Double door

primary

entrance in

center archway,

which was used

as a sally port

by cavalry

274 630 S. Oakes

Enlisted Men's

Barracks 2

Fort Concho NHL City of San Angelo x x x x High

19th century

military fort

building

Limestone

buildings

clustered

around parade

grounds south

of Concho

River US Military

Gable, wood

shingles Solid stone Stone

2 roof

ridge

vents

Wood, double-

hung, 6/6

Two single

doors; center

arched passage,

now enclosed,

which was used

as a sally port

by cavalry

275 507 Avenue D

Fort Concho

Bakery City of San Angelo High

19th century

military fort

building Walkway, trees Craftsman

Gable,

composition,

exposed rafter

tails, brackets Solid stone Stone

Wood, double-

hung Single door

276 501 Wool

Scripps Acquisition

LP Medium

Metal

warehouse Commercial

Metal,

wood posts Metal

120

A 803 S. Chadbourne Robert B. Sanchez High

Commercial

building--old

service station

Raised

concrete for

gas pumps Moderne Flat with parapet Frame Brick veneer

Fixed, 2 round

"fisheye" windows Single door

120

B 803 S. Chadbourne Robert B. Sanchez Low House

Folk, hall-and-

parlor Gable, composition

Concrete

block Stucco Boarded up Single door

145

A 22 E. Avenue B

Steve and Joe

Kollmyer x High

Commercial

building

Metal building at

rear (north)

Storage yard,

chain link fence

to west,

unpaved alley

to north, no

setback Mission

Gable, metal,

rounded, stair-

stepped parapet CMU Brick 3

Metal, double-

hung

Double door,

large center bay

145

B 22 E. Avenue B

Steve and Joe

Kollmyer x

High

(north,

brick end)

Brick

warehouse

with metal

addition built

on front or

south

elevation

Unpaved alley

to north, no

setback Commercial

Gable, metal,

parapet in front on

added metal

section

Brick, wood

posts Brick 1, wood, fixed Double door

198

A 200 Bird Jean Bundrant High House

Apartment north

of house (410

Porter)

Sidewalks,

walkway

National Folk,

pyrimidal

Hipped,

composition Frame Wood siding

Enclosed, boarded

over

Single door with

transom and

sidelights that

are enclosed

with siding

198

B 410 Porter Jean Bundrant Low

Outbuilding to

200 Bird

(apartment) Drive No style

Flat and shed,

composition

Frame and

metal

Board-and-

batten wood

siding and

metal

Wood, double-

hung Single door

252

A 202 Henry O. Flipper

Texas Workforce

Commission City of San Angelo Low

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

unpaved alley

to north, Fort

Concho's

original stables

to east Commercial

Flat with stair-

stpped parapet

Brick, wood

posts

Pre-cast

concrete

panels Fixed, aluminum

Double door with

transom and

sidelights

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

252

B 210 Henry O. Flipper City of San Angelo Medium

Commercial

building

Sidewalks,

unpaved alley

to north, Fort

Concho's

original stables

to west Commercial Flat with parapet

Brick, wood

posts Brick

Metal, casement

(louvred) east and

north with stone

lintels; fixed in

front or south Single door

57A 229 W. Avenue D

Egeneo Cano and

Bertha Gonzales Low House Sidewalks Crafstman

Hipped,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame

Asbestos

siding

Wood, double-

hung, aluminum

screens Single door

57B 227 W. Avenue D

Egeneo Cano and

Bertha Gonzales Low House

Located at end

of concrete

ribbon

driveway

National Folk --

Pyrimidal

Hipped,

composition,

exposed rafter tails Frame Wood Siding

Wood, double-

hung Single door

57C 225 W. Avenue D

Egeneo Cano and

Bertha Gonzales Low House

Wire fence in

rear

National Folk,

hall-and-

parlor Gable, composition Frame Vinyl siding

Aluminum, double-

hung Single door

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Porches Plan Foundation Stories Dimensions Square Feet

Inte

grity

of L

ocat

ion

Des

ign

Mat

eria

ls

Wor

kman

ship

Setti

ngFe

elin

gA

ssoc

iatio

n

Historic Function Current Function Date Built Architects Builders/ Craftsmen

No

Thre

ats

Dam

age

Neg

lect

Dev

elop

men

tM

ajor

Alte

ratio

nVa

canc

y

Blo

ck N

o.

Legal Description Addition

NR

Crit

erio

n A

NR

Crit

erio

n B

NR

Crit

erio

n C

NR

Crit

erio

n D

Gable roof U-shaped

Pier-and-

beam 1 x x x x x x x

Educational/so

cial

Educational/so

cial 1939

Leonard

Mauldin WPA x 5 x x

Shed roof,

classical

columns

Bungalow,

four-square

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,828 x x x x x x Domestic

Domestic,

multi-family

c. 1880 to

1940s x 6 Lot 9 Park Heights x x

Shed roof Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 6 Lots 7 and 8 and east 25 feet of Lot 6 Park Heights x

Shed roof,

enclosed Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 x x x Domestic Domestic 1931 to 1947 x 6 Lots 7 and 8 and east 25 feet of Lot 6 Park Heights x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 2 74,000 x x x x x Commerce Commerce c. 1968 x 6 Lots 1 through 5 Park Heights

Shed roof

Modified

center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,076 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1913 to 1920 x 6 Lot 12 and west half of Lot 11 Park Heights x

Gable roof Four-square

Pier-and-

beam 2 2,240 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1928 x 6 Lot 10 and east half of Lot 11 Park Heights x x

Gable roof Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 2,320 x x Domestic Commerce

c. 1920s to

1950s x 7 Lot 1 Park Heights

Gable roof, brick

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,093 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1923 x 7 Lot 2 Park Heights x x

Inset, arched

opening Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,376 x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1925 x 7 Lot 3 Park Heights x

Shed roof,

classical

columns

Bungalow,

four-square

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,280 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1913 to 1920 x 7 L0t 4 Park Heights x x

Inset, no roof U-shaped

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,314 Domestic Domestic 1927 to 1931 x x x 7 Lot 5 Park Heights x

Shed roof,

classical

columns Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,280 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1913 to 1920 x 7 Lot 6 Park Heights x x

Inset, wood

posts Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 999 x x Domestic Domestic

c. 1920s to

1950s x 7 Lot 7 and west half of lot 8 Park Heights

Inset, fabricated

metal Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 2,856 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1912 x 7 Lot 9 and east half of lot 8 Park Heights x x

Gable roof,

wood posts Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 936 x x Domestic Vacant After 1949 x x 7 Lot 10 Park Heights

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Shed roof, box

columns Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,148 x x x x x Domestic Domestic After 1949 x 7 Lot 11 Park Heights x

Gable roof,

wood posts Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,334 x x Domestic Domestic 1931 to 1949 x 7 Lot 12 Park Heights

Hipped roof,

classical

columns Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,216 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1913 to 1920 x 7 Lot 13 and half of lot 14 Park Heights x

Inset, piers,

tapered box

supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 868 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 7 Lot 15 and west half of lot 14 Park Heights x

Two porches

with gable roofs,

fabricated metal

supports

Bungalow,

rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,260 x x x

Domestic,

duplex

Domestic,

duplex 1927 to 1931 x x 7 Lot 16 Park Heights

Shed roof,

brackets Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 2 1,792 x x x x

Domestic,

duplex

Domestic,

duplex 1927 to 1931 x 7 Lot 17 Park Heights x

T-plan

Perimeter

wall 2 15,464 Religious Religious

19 and

150

Block 150 -- Lots 1 to 3

Block 19--West 31 feet of lot 4, West

31 feet of lot 7

Block 150--

Fort Concho

Block 19--

Millspaugh

Gable roof, brick

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 832 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927 x

19 and

150

Block 150--East 64 feet of West 95 feet

of Lot 4

Block 19--East 64 feet of west 95 feet

of lot 7

Block 150--

Fort Concho

Block 19--

Millspaugh x x

Gable roof, brick

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,088 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x

19 and

150

Block 150--East 58.66 feet of Lot 4

Block 19--East 58 feet of Lot 7

Block 150--

Fort Concho

Block 19--

Millspaugh x x

Gable roof,

arches Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,369 x x x x Domestic Domestic

c. 1927 to

1960s x 150 West 80 feet of lot 5 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

metal posts Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 967 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 150 East 100 feet of lot 5 Fort Concho x

Shed roof,

turned wood

posts L-plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 834 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x 19 Lot 8 Millspaugh x

Inset, classical

columns Rectangular Slab 1 1,792 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic

c. 1950s to

1960s x 19 Lot 1 Millspaugh x

Shed roof,

fabricated metal

supports Rectangular Slab 1 1,828 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1931 to 1949 x 19 Lot 3 Millspaugh x

Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 816 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic

c. 1930s to

1960s x 19

East 37.5 feet of Lot 4 and West 10

feet of Lot 3 Millspaugh x

Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 816 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic

c. 1949 to

1960s x 19

West 22.5 feet of Lot 4 and East 27.5

feet of Lot 5 Millspaugh x

L-plan Slab 1 1,200 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic

c. 1950s to

1960s x 19

West 30 feet of Lot 5 and East 20 feet

of Lot 6 Millspaugh x

Inset under

hipped roof,

wood posts,

lattice board as

balustrade Shotgun

Pier-and-

beam 1 592 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1931 to 1949 x 18 Lot 7 Millspaugh x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Gable roof,

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 960 x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1931 to 1949 x 18 Lot 8 Millspaugh x

Inset, classical

columns on

piers L-plan 1 1,500 x x Domestic

Domestic,

commerce/

trade After 1949 x 18 Lot 9 Millspaugh

Shed roof, wood

posts

Center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 600 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 18 Lot 10 Millspaugh x

Shed roof, wood

posts

Center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 880 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 18 Lot 11 Millspaugh x

Inset, wood

posts Rectangular 1 1,380 x x Domestic Domestic After 1949 x 18 Lot 12 Millspaugh

Mission parapet,

arches on

stuccoed walls Rectangular 1 1,944 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade

Recent, c.

2002 x 18 Lot 2 Millspaugh

Rectangular 1 3,017 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade After 1949 x 18 Lot 3 Millspaugh

Shed roof, wood

posts L-plan 1 1,780 x x

Commerce/

trade Vacant 1931 to 1949 x 18 Lot 4 Millspaugh

Rectangular 1 1,260 x x

Commerce/

trade Vacant

After 1949,

c. 1950s x 18 Lot 5 Millspaugh

Fabric canopy

on metal posts Rectangular

1; 2 on

east

end

8,400 first

floor; 1,200

second floor

apartment x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade

After 1949,

c. 1950s x 151 Lot 5 Fort Concho x

Shed roof, metal

posts Rectangular 1 3,500 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade

c. 1940s to

1950s x 17 Lot 6 Millspaugh

Shed roof,

fabricated metal

supports L-plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 780 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 17 Lot 5 Millspaugh x

Two flat roof,

wood posts Rectangular 1 2,920 x x x x Domestic Domestic After 1949 x 17 Lot 4 Millspaugh x

Fabric canopy

Modified L-

plan 1 5,887 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade After 1949 x 17 Lots 1 and 2 Millspaugh

Gable roof, brick

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 764 x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 17 Lot 8 Millspaugh x

Shed roof, metal

posts

Center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,056 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x 17 Lot 7 Millspaugh x x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Bungalow 1 1,598 x x Domestic Domestic

c. 1920s to

1960s x 20 Lot 6 Millspaugh

Modified L-

plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,771 x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x x 20 Lot 5 Millspaugh

Center

passage, off-

center

Pier-and-

beam 1 660 x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x x 20 Lot 4 Millspaugh

Shed roof,

fabricated metal

supports

L-plan, U-

plan with

attached

carport Slab 1 1,480 x x Domestic Domestic

After 1949,

c. 1950s x 20 Lot 2 Millspaugh

Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,144 x x Domestic Domestic

After 1949,

c. 1950s x 20 Lot 1 Millspaugh

Clipped gable

roof, fabricated

metal supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 816 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1931 to 1949 x 20 West 120 feet of Lot 7 Millspaugh x

Shed roof,

classical

columns L-plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 940 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x 74 Lot 16 Fort Concho x x

Gable roof over

each door

supported by

brackets

Bungalow,

rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,364 x x x x x x

Domestic,

multi-family

Domestic,

multi-family 1927 to 1931 x 74 Lot 15 Fort Concho x

Shed roof, wood

posts, over

entry only Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,038 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 74 Lot 14 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

wood posts,

wood balustrade Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,600 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 74 Lot 13 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

fabricated metal

supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 941 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 74 West 42 feet of lots 11 and 12 Fort Concho x

None

Four-square,

modified L-

plan

Pier-and-

beam 2 2,367 x x x x

Domestic,

multi-family

Domestic,

multi-family 1927 to 1931 x 74 Parts of Lots 10, 11, and 12 Fort Concho x

Gable roof over

each door, wood

posts

Bungalow,

rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 x x x x x x

Domestic,

multi-family

Domestic,

multi-family 1927 to 1931 x 74 Fort Concho x

Gable roof, full

brick piers,

entry arch and

lattice board

between brick

columns

Bungalow,

rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,280 x x x

Domestic,

multi-family Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 74 Lot 10 Fort Concho

Gable roof, brick

piers, tapered

box supports-

one missing Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,056 x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x 74 Lot 9 Fort Concho x

Hipped roof,

turned wood

posts Rectangular Slab 1 1,456 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic c. 1960s x 74 Lots 7 and 8 Fort Concho

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Inset, front

wood post

enclosed in

wood siding Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,054 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x 74 Lot 6 Fort Concho x x

Shed roof,

turned wood

posts Irregular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,270 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 74 East 45 feet of lot 5 Fort Concho x x

Inset, tapered

box support on

rock wall Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 984 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 74

East 39 feet of lot 4 and west 5 feet of

lot 5 Fort Concho x

Shed roof,

turned wood

posts,

spindlework, jig-

sawn trim Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,292 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic

Before 1920--

c. 1905 x 74 Lot 3 and west 10 feet of lot 4 Fort Concho x x

Gable roof, brick

piers, tapered

box supports-

one missing Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,334 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 71 Lot 16 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

wood posts Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,100 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 71 Lot 15 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

clipped, wood

posts

Center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,344 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 71 Lot 14 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

bricked in with

arches Bungalow 1 1,680 x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 71 Lot 13 Fort Concho

Gable roof with

brackets, brick

piers, tapered

box supports,

fabricated metal

supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,356 x x x x x x

Domestic,

multi-family

Domestic,

multi-family 1920 to 1927 x 71 West 46 feet of Lots 10 through 12 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

classical

columns,

ornamental

woodwork in

gable peak Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 2,016 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 71

West 46 feet of east 96 feet of Lots 10,

11, and 12 Fort Concho x

Shed roof, brick

piers, fabricated

metal supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,332 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 71 East 50 feet of Lots 10 through 12 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

wood posts

Bungalow,

rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,016 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 71 East 50 feet of Lots 7 though 9 Fort Concho x

Inset, low brick

wall with planter Rectangular Slab 1 1,436 x x x Domestic Domestic

1927 to

1931/ c.

1950s x 71 East 44 feet of lots 7 though 9 Fort Concho x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Inset, low brick

wall in front

T-plan,

rectangular Slab 1 1,852 x x x x x x

Domestic/

multi-family Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 71 West 46 feet of Lots 7 through 9 Fort Concho x

Inset, brick

piers, wood

posts, screened

Bungalow,

rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,810 x x x x Domestic

Domestic/

multi-family 1927 to 1931 x 71 Lot 6 and east 10 feet of lot 5 Fort Concho x

Hipped roof,

brick piers,

tapered box

supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,644 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic

Before 1920--

c. 1915 x 71

East 35 feet of Lot 4 and West 40 feet

of lot 5 Fort Concho x

Inset, arches Rectangular 1 1,900 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 71 Lot 3 and west 15 feet of lot 4 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 18,690 x x x x x

Industry/

processing;

commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade

Middle

building:

1927 to

1931; other

two: After

1949 x 48 Lots 13, 14, and 15

Neelys S/D of

Fort Concho x x

Cantilevered

awning; built-in

stone planter Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 2,138 x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade

After 1949,

c. 1950s x 48 Lot 6

Neelys S/D of

Fort Concho x

Four-square 1 1,600 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1931 to 1949 x 48 Lots 9 and 10

Neelys S/D of

Fort Concho

Modified L-

plan

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 7,450 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1958 x 70 Lot 5 Fort Concho

Gable roof

supported by

turned wood

posts over each

door

Bungalow,

rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,198 x x x x x x

Domestic/

multi-family

Domestic/

multi-family 1927 to 1931 x 70 Lot 2 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

classical

columns Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,536 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 70 Lot 1 Fort Concho x

Inset Four-square 1 1,827 x x x x Domestic Domestic After 1949 x 70 Lot 18 (secondary address 516 S. Hill) Fort Concho x

Inset, brick pier

with tapered

box support,

wood post,

balustrade Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam

1, front,

2, rear

addition 2,064 x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x 70 Lot 17 Fort Concho x

Gable roof, brick

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,344 x x x x x x

Domestic/

multi-family

Domestic/

multi-family 1920 to 1927 x 70 Lot 16 Fort Concho x

Inset, open

wood column Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,352 x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 70 Lot 15 Fort Concho

Shed roof,

raised center

gable roof, wood

posts, horizontal

board facing

under center

gable Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 742 x x x x x

Domestic/

multi-family

Domestic/

multi-family 1920 to 1927 x 70

Lots 10, 11, and west 2 feet of Lots 12

through 14 Fort Concho x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Shed roof,

raised center

gable, brick

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,344 x x x x x x

Domestic/

multi-family

Domestic/

multi-family 1927 to 1931 x 70 East half of Lots 12 through 14 Fort Concho x x

Shed roof,

raised center

gable, brick

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,344 x x x x x x

Domestic/

multi-family

Domestic/

multi-family 1927 to 1931 x 70 East half of Lots 12 through 14 Fort Concho x x

Gable, dentils,

brackets, brick

piers, fabricated

metal supports,

brick columns,

brick balustrade, Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,239 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x 75 Lot 4 Fort Concho x x

Gable, dentils,

brackets, brick

piers,tapered

box supports,

brick columns,

brick balustrade, Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,288 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x 75 Lot 3 Fort Concho x x

Shed roof, full

brick columns L-plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,240 x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x 75 Lot 2 Fort Concho

Gable roof,

enclosed in brick Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,323 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 75 Lot 1 Fort Concho x x

Gable roof

supported by

fabricated metal Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,512 x x Domestic Domestic 1927 to 1931 x 75 Lot 18 Fort Concho

Inset, wood

posts Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 840 x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x 75 Lot 16 Fort Concho

Gable roof,

metal poles Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,034 x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x x 75 Lot 15 Fort Concho

Flat roof,

classical

columns, wood

piers Four-square

Pier-and-

beam 2 2,552 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1931 x 75

Lots 13 and 14 and south 7.5 feet of

Lot 12 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 4,758 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1950 x 21 1/2 Lot 2 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular 1 1/2 1,110 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920 to 1927 x x

21 and 21

1/2

Block 21: East 65 feet of West 120 feet

of lot 12 Block

21 1/2: East 65 feet of West 120 feet

of lot 1

Millspaugh and

Fort Concho x x

Gable roof

supported by

fabricated metal

Center

passage,

rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,046 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1931 to 1949 x

21 and 21

1/2

Block 21: West 55 feet of Lot 12

Block 21 1/2: West 55 feet of Lot 1

Millspaugh and

Fort Concho x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Shed roof, wood

posts Shotgun

Pier-and-

beam 1 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1931 to 1949 x 21 Millspaugh x

Shed roof, wood

posts Shotgun

Pier-and-

beam 1 490 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1931 to 1949 x x 21 Lot 11 and West 5 feet of lot 10 Millspaugh

Gable roof

supported by

fabricated metal Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 854 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1931 to 1949 x 21 East 50 feet of lot 10 Millspaugh

Gable roof,

wood posts with

cut-out design Four-square

Pier-and-

beam 2 1,280 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade Domestic 1927 to 1931 x x 21 Lot 9 Millspaugh x

Metal awning

over door Four-square

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 1,200 x x

Commerce/

trade x 21 Lots 3,4, and 5 Millspaugh

Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 2,591 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade After 1949 x 16 Lot 4 and west half of lots 5 and 6 Millspaugh

Modified L-

plan

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 5,700 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade

East end or

114 built

after 1949;

West end or

118, built

1931 to 1949 x 16 Lot 12 and north half of Lot 11 Millspaugh

Four-square

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 2,600 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1931 to 1949 x 16 Lot 14 Millspaugh

Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 3,000 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade

After 1949,

c. 1957 x x 16 Lots 15 through 17 Millspaugh

Rectangular Slab 1

80 feet

long by

52 feet

wide 4,800 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1927 to 1931 x 15 South parts of Lots 13 and 14 Millspaugh

Shed roof,

enclosed Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1

67 feet

long by

53 feet

wide 3,603 x x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1931 to 1949 x 15 Lots 1 to 6 Millspaugh x x

L-plan

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1

95 feet

long by

57 feet

wide 4,760 x x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1931 to 1949 x 15 Part of lots 20, 21 and part of alley Millspaugh x x

Hipped roof,

bracketed box

columns,

wraparound--

east, south,

west and part of

north Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 2 x x x x x x x Transportation Transportation 1909

Albert T.

Camfield,

KCM&O staff

member x 15

Between S. Irving and S. Chadbourne

along north side of railroad tracks and

south of W. Hardeman Pass Millspaugh x x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 5,482 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1950s x 76 Lots 9 and 10 Fort Concho x

Rectangular Slab 1 2,228 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade After 1949 x 76 Lots 21 and 22 Fort Concho

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1/2 2,500 x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade Before 1920 x x 76 Lot 20 Fort Concho x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1/2 1,232 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1920 to 1927 x 76 Lot 18 and 19 Fort Concho

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1/2 5,000 x x x x x x

Recreation/

culture Vacant 1931 to 1949 x 76 Lots 16 and 17 Fort Concho x x

Metal awning

with tie rods Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1/2 4,000 x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1927 to 1931 x 76 Lot 15 and south 15 feet of lot 14 Fort Concho x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1/2 Partial

4,000 plus

819 in base-

ment x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1927 to 1931 x x 76 Lot 13 and north 10 feet of lot 14 Fort Concho x

Inset entry with

stoop

Modified L-

plan

Perimeter

wall 1 Partial 10,200 x x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1952 x 76 Lots 1 to 5 Fort Concho x x

Four-square

Slab,

Perimeter

wall 1 14,690 x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1950s x 69 Lots 20 to 24 Fort Concho x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 x x x x x

Commerce/

trade Government 1931 to 1949 x 69 Lots 13 through 19 and 10 feet of alley Fort Concho x

Four-square

Perimeter

wall 1 5,180 x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade

1927 to 1931

or later x 49 Lots 1 to 5 Miller JA x

Detached in

front of entry

with flat roof

and brick piers Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 3,168 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1950s x 49 South part of Lot 6 and 7 Beaver FT x x

Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall x x x x x x x

Recreation/

culture

Recreation/

culture 1987 x 50 North of municipal swimming pool x

Modified L-

plan

Perimeter

wall 2 x x x x x x x

Recreation/

culture

Recreation/

culture 1938-1939

John G.

Becker WPA x 50 x x

Rectangular x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade After 1949 x 68 Lot 2 Fort Concho

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Rectangular 1 2,120 x x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1948 x 68 Lots A through D

Abbott

Addition x x

Hanging canopy

or awning

supported by

tierods Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 2,500 x x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1927-1931 x 68 Lot E

Abbott

Addition x x

Hanging canopy

or awning

supported by

tierods Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1,440 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1920 to 1927 x 68 Lot A

Shipmans

Addition x x

Hanging canopy

or awning

supported by

tierods Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1,416 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1920 to 1927 x 68 Lot B

Shipmans

Addition x x

Hanging canopy

or awning

supported by

tierods Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1/2 2,400 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade Before 1913 x 68 Lot C

Shipmans

Addition x x

Mansard

hanging awning Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 2 10,560 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1920 to 1927 x x 68 Lot D and E

Shipmans

Addition x x

Rectangular 1 5,000 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade After 1949 x 68 Lots 13 and 14 Fort Concho

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 11,302 x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1931-1949 x 77 Lots 1 through 10 and adjacent alley Fort Concho

Triangular

Perimeter

wall 1 10,507 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1927-1931 x 77 Lots 11 through 15 and adjacent alley Fort Concho x x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall, pier-

and-beam 2

300 feet

long by

26 feet

wide 7,800 x x x x x x Transportation

Government/

social 1909-1910 x 77 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular Slab 1

140 feet

long by

68 feet

wide 7,577 x x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1996

McLaughlin

Alaniz Torres

Architects x 23 .239 acres and.172 acres

LM Caster and

Hatcher x

Hipped roof Rectangular Slab 2

128 feet

long by

64 feet

wide 8,192 x x x x x x x

Recreation/

culture

Recreation/

culture 1996

McLaughlin

Alaniz Torres

Architects

Templeton

Construction x 23 x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

T-plan

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1

90 feet

long by

95 feet

wide 7,926 x x x

Industry/

processing Vacant 1931-1949 x x 14 Lot 15 and south half of lot 16 Millspaugh

Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1

75 feet

long by

30 feet

wide 2,250 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1930 x x 14 Lots F through H Caster's LM

Rectangular Slab 1

50 feet

long by

40 feet

wide 2,464 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade After 1949 x 14 Lots A through D Caster's LM

Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1

60 feet

long by

22 feet

wide 1,320 x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1931-1949 x 14 Lot 7 Millspaugh x

Rectangular Slab 1

80 feet

long by

42 feet

wide 3,360 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1950s x 14 Lots 11 and 12 Millspaugh

Hipped roof Rectangular Slab 2

128 feet

long by

64 feet

wide 8,192 x x x x x x x

Recreation/

culture

Recreation/

culture 1995

McLaughlin

Alaniz Torres

Architects

Templeton

Construction x 24

West 50 feet of lot 4 and east 5 feet of

lot 5 Millspaugh x

Inset garage

bay, metal poles Rectangular Slab 1

120 feet

long by

60 feet

wide 7,200 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade After 1949 x 24 Lot 2 Millspaugh

Metal canopy

with tie-rods Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 2,100 x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1947 x 24 South 35 feet of Lot 1 Millspaugh x

Metal canopy

with tie-rods

and wood posts Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 to 2 5,100 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1961 x x 24 North 85 feet of Lot 1 Millspaugh

Fabric awnings Rectangular Slab 1 x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1889 x 78 Lot 20 and north 5 feet of lot 21 Fort Concho

Shed roof,

pyrimidal hipped

roof, turned

wood posts,

spindlework Irregular

Pier-and-

beam 2

80 feet

long by

40 feet

wide 3,200 x x x x Domestic

Educational/

Commerce/

trade 1909

May have

been Oscar

Ruffini x 67

Shed roof,

turned wood

posts Rectangular Slab 1 x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1928 x 67

Shed roof with

gable over

entry, turned

wood posts,

spindlework,

balustrade Irregular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 x x x x Domestic Government 1900 Oscar Ruffini x 67

Wood overhang

with brackets

over entry

2-room,

center

passage Slab 1 x x x x Domestic

Commerce/

trade c. 1890 x 67

Cantilevered

concrete,

concrete

columns,

concrete steps

Rectangular,

irregular

Perimeter

wall 1 x x x x x x x

Recreation/

culture

Recreation/

culture 1999

Hardy

Holzman

Pfeiffer

Associates x 51 x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Hipped roof,

wood posts,

arches

Modified L-

plan

Perimeter

wall,

concrete

floor 2 19,364 x x x x x x x

Industry/

processing

Commerce/

trade 1931-1949 x 51 Lots 1 through 6 Love's SD x x

Drive- through L-plan

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 880 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Educational/

Recreation/

culture 1927-1931 x 51 Lots 11 and 12

Forrester &

Bailey SD x x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 Full

1,250 with

1,250 in

basement x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Educational/

Recreation/

culture 1931-1949 x 51 Lot 10

Forrester &

Bailey SD x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 2,304 x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Educational/

Recreation/

culture

423: 1931-

1949

425: After

1949 x 51 Lot 8

Forrester &

Bailey SD x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1,250 x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Educational/

Recreation/

culture 1927-1931 x 51 Lot 7

Forrester &

Bailey SD x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1/2 2,496 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Educational/

Recreation/

culture 1927-1931 x 51 Lot 5

Forrester &

Bailey SD x x

x x x x x x x Transportation Transportation 1930

W.S.

Thomson

Construction

Co. x x x

Oval Moderne

awning Rectangular

Slab,

Perimeter

wall,

concrete

floor 1 11,217 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade Vacant 1920-1927 x River lots Lot 1 and west half of lot 2 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 1/2 770 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade After 1949 x River lots West 15 feet of lot 3 Fort Concho

Clipped gable

roof, brick piers,

three wood

supports on

each pier Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,488 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920-1927 x River lots

East 50 feet of west 60 feet of South

100 feet of lot 5 Fort Concho x x

Gable roof, arch

under brackets,

classical column Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,704 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920-1927 x River lots

East 40 feet of lot 5 and west 25 feet of

lot 6 Fort Concho x x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Shed roof, wood

piers supporting

double tapered

classical

columns,

wraparound,

balustrade

between

columns Four square

Pier-and-

beam 2

Partial--

549

square

feet 2,508 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x River lots

East 75 feet of lot 6 and west 25 feet of

lot 7 Fort Concho x x

Shed roof, brick

piers

(stuccoed),

tapered box

supports,

balcony with rail

added above.

Bungalow

with added

second story

Pier-and-

beam 2 2,118 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x River lots West 73 feet of east 75 feet of lot 7 Fort Concho x

Recreation/

culture

Recreation/

culture 1967 x River lots Fort Concho

Cantilevered

canopy Rectangular

Perimeter

walls 10 x x x x x x x

Domestic

(multi-family)

Domestic

(multi-family)

1964-1967

(west wing);

1972 (east

wing) x River lots

6.7080 acres being part of Lots 11

through 14 Fort Concho x x x

Gable roof

supported by

brackets

Center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,044 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic

Parts of

house could

have been

built before

1920s, but

house is

definitely

built by 1927-

1931 x Block 81 East 217.7 feet of lot 10 Fort Concho x x

Arched roof,

fabricated metal

Shotgun,

rectangular 1 1,632 x x Domestic Domestic x Block 81 West 100 feet of lot 10 Fort Concho

Inset, brick

columns Bungalow 1 1/2 1,279 x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x Block 81 Lot 9 Fort Concho

Inset, two

arches, brick

and stone wall

and brick

column inset

with rocks and

fossils Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,320 x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x Block 81 Lot 8 Fort Concho x

Inset, fabricated

metal supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,078 x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x Block 81 Lot 7 Fort Concho x

Inset, wood

posts

Modified L-

plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,834 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1951 x Block 81 Lot 6 Fort Concho x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Flat roof, wood

posts, groupings

of 3

Shotgun,

rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,080 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic c. 1920 x Block 81 Lot 4 and east 25 feet of lot 3 Fort Concho x x

Inset, 3 stone

arches T-plan

Pier-and-

beam

1 1/2

front; 2-

story

rear 1,840 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1930 x Block 81

Lot 2 and west half of lot 3 and south

26 feet of lot 1 Fort Concho x x

Gable roof

supported by

brackets Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,063 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1924 x Block 81 Lot 1 less south 26 feet Fort Concho x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 1,944 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade

Originally

built as two

separate

buildings

between

1920 and

1927, joined

together

between

1931 and

1949 x Block 81 Lot 12 Fort Concho

Hipped roof,

fabricated metal

supports Irregular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,198 x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1908 x Block 80 Lot 6 and east 7.5 feet of lot 5 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

wood posts Shotgun

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,056 x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927-1931 x Block 80 West 42.5 feet of lot 5 Fort Concho x

Inset, shingled

wood piers,

classical

columns Four square

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x Block 80 Lot 4 Fort Concho x x

Inset with frame

wall topped with

classical

columns, wall is

covered with

wood shingles Four square

Pier-and-

beam 2 1,416 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1911 x Block 80 Lot 3 Fort Concho x x

Shed roof,

turned wood

posts

Modified L-

plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,136 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1901 x Block 80 Lot 2 Fort Concho x x

Shed roof,

turned wood

posts, jig-sawn

trim

Modified L-

plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,064 x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1908 x Block 80 East 50 feet of west 90 feet of lot 1 Fort Concho

Gable roof, 2

classical

columns

Center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 811 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927-1931 x Block 80 West 40 feet of lot 1 Fort Concho

Inset, stuccoed

brick piers,

tapered box

supports,

screened in with

added storm

door Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,276 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1906 x Block 82 Lot 15 Fort Concho x x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Inset, wood

posts, brackets,

lattice board as

balustrade, gate

added Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,248 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1902 x Block 82 Lot 14 Fort Concho x

Inset, classical

columns Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 968 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x Block 82 Lot 11 Fort Concho x x

Inset, brick

piers, one

classical column Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,368 x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x Block 82 Lot 10 Fort Concho x

Shed roof,

classical

columns Four square

Pier-and-

beam 2 1/2 2,342 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1900 x Block 82 Lot 9 Fort Concho x x

Inset, stuccoed

curved support Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,302 x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x Block 82 Lot 7 Fort Concho x

Shed roof,

classical

columns, wraps

around west

side L-plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,548 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x Block 82 Lot 6 Fort Concho x x

Gable roof, brick

piers covered

with stucco,

tapered box

supports,

stuccoed wall

surrounding Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,886 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920-1927 x Block 82 Lot 5 and east 12.5 feet of lot 4 Fort Concho x x

L-plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,276 x x Domestic Domestic c. 1940s x Block 82

East 37.5 feet of lot 3 and west 37.5

feet of lot 4 Fort Concho

Inset, box

column covered

with siding Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,276 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x Block 82

East 43.5 feet of lot 2 and west 12.5

feet of lot 3 Fort Concho x x

Gable roof, brick

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam

1 in

front; 2

in rear

addition 1,708 x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927-1931 x Block 82 Lot 1 and west 6.5 feet of lot 2 Fort Concho x

Arbor north of

entry, concrete

stoop in front of

door Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 625 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920-1927 x Block 82 North 50 feet of lot 16 Fort Concho x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Shed roof,

turned wood

posts

Modified L-

plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,563 x x x x x Domestic Domestic c. 1900 x Block 83 Lots 9 and 10 Fort Concho x

Inset, shed roof,

tapered classical

columns on

brick piers

Irregular, L-

plan

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,194 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x Block 83 Lot 8 Fort Concho x x

Inset, brick

piers, 1 tapered

wood post Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,232 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x Block 83 Lot 7 Fort Concho x

Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 7,280 x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1927-1931 x Block 83

Lot 3 and east 15 feet of lot 2 and

north 100 feet of west 35 feet of lot 2 Fort Concho

L-plan

Slab,

Perimeter

wall,

concrete

floor 1 6,000 x x x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1913-1920 x Block 83

Northwest 100.36 feet and 60 feet of

lots 1 and 2 Fort Concho x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall 1 4,500 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1930s x Block 83

South 50 feet of lot 1 and south 50 feet

of west 35 feet of lot 2 Fort Concho

Hipped roof,

classical

columns Irregular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,731 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x Block 83 Lot 12 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular

1 in

front, 2

in rear

addition 2,038 x x Domestic Domestic 1908-1913 x Block 83 Lot 11 Fort Concho

Shed roof,

wraparound,

wood posts Irregular

Pier-and-

beam 2 1,966 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1908 x Block 83 Lots 9 and 10 Fort Concho x x

Shed foof, wood

posts Rectangular 1 8,925 x x

Commerce/

trade Vacant 1920-1927 x Block 79 Lots 6, 7 and east 45 feet of lot 8

Fort Concho--

building on

leased ground

Irregualr,

built along

street angles

Perimeter

wall 1 20,604 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1913-1920 x Block 79 North 90 feet of lots 1, 2, and 3 Fort Concho

Gable roof,

arched stone

columns

Shotgun,

rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 725 x x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1931-1949 x Block 63 Lot 16 Fort Concho x x

Gable roof, brick

piers, double

wood posts, fan

in gable, added

mansard

overhang over

porch and

sindows Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,136 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927 x Block 63 Lot 15 Fort Concho x

Inset, 1 brick

pier and 1 wood

post Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,051 x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1927 x Block 63 Lot 14 Fort Concho x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Gable roof,

stuccoed brick

piers, tapered

box supports

Center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,332 x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1927 x Block 63 Lot 13 Fort Concho x

Gable roof, brick

box columns Bungalow 1 1/2 1,690 x x Domestic Domestic c. 1930s x Block 63 Lot 12 Fort Concho

Center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 914 x x x Domestic Domestic After 1949 x Block 63 Lot 11 Fort Concho

Inset, double

wood post Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 857 x x x Domestic Domestic 1927-1931 x Block 63 Lot 10 Fort Concho

Inset, brick

piers, fabricated

metal supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 1,344 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927-1931 x Block 63 Lot 9 Fort Concho x

Inset, wood

posts,

balustrade,

screened-in Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1/2 848 x x x x x Domestic Domestic After 1949 x Block 63 Lot 7 Fort Concho x

2-gable roofs,

wood posts Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,150 x x x x x x Social Domestic 1931-1949 x Block 63 Lots 5 and 6 Fort Concho x

x x x x Transportation Transportation

After 1909,

appears to

have been

updated later x Block 63

Intersection of Rust and Allen Sts.

Under bridge Fort Concho x

Inset

Four square

with addition

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,710 x x Domestic Domestic After 1949 x Block 64 Lot 1 Fort Concho

Hipped roof,

classical

columns Irregular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,098 x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x Block 64 Lot 2 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

double wood

posts,

balustrade,

exposed rafter

tails

Bungalow,

shotgun

Pier-and-

beam 1 912 x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1930 x Block 64 West 42 feet of lot 3 Fort Concho x

Shed roof,

double wood

posts Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,036 x x x x x Domestic Domestic Before 1920 x Block 64

West 47 feet of lot 4 and east 8 feet of

lot 3 Fort Concho x

Gable roof, Brick

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,344 x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927-1931 x Block 64 Lot 5 and east 3 feet of lot 4 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

fabricated metal

supports, arbor

in front Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,107 x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1920-1927 x Block 64 Lot 6 Fort Concho x

Hipped roof,

wood posts Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,408 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1931-1949 x Block 64

Lot 7 excluding south 60 feet of east 25

feet Fort Concho x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Shed roof, wood

posts,

spindlework

Center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,088 x x x x Domestic Domestic After 1949 x Block 64 North 130 feet of lot 8 Fort Concho x

Gable roof,

wood posts Shotgun

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,088 x x x x Domestic Domestic c. 1945 x Block 64

South 60 feet of lot 8 and south 60 feet

of east 25 feet of lot 7 Fort Concho x

Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 1/2 x x Government Government After 1949 x Block 64 Fort Concho

Rectangular 1 1/2 37,620 x x x x x

Industry/

processing;

commerce/

trade Vacant 1931-1949 x x Block 65 North 270 feet of east half Fort Concho x

Shed roof with

exposed rafter

tails supported

by wood posts,

over each door Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall,

concrete

floor 1 14,400

Industry/

processing Vacant 1931 to 1949 x x Block 66 Lot 16 and north 35.8 feet of Lot 15 Fort Concho

Shed roof, wood

posts Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1 12,350 x x

Commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1959 x Block 66

North 48 feet of Lot 14 and South 14.2

feet of lot 15 Fort Concho

Shed roof, wood

posts Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 2 8,056 x x x x x

Industry/

processing;

commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade c. 1938 x Block 66 Lot 13 and south 2 fet of Lot 14 Fort Concho x

Shed roof, wood

posts Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 2 9,500 x x x x x

Industry/

processing;

commerce/

trade

Commerce/

trade 1931-1949 x Block 66 Lot 12 Fort Concho x

Uncovered,

concrete steps

and stoop,

streamlined

stair railing Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall,

concrete

floor 1 31,280 x x x x x x x Transportation Vacant 1931 to 1949 x Block 84 North 221 feet of east half of block Fort Concho x x

Rectangular 1 9,877 x x

Commerce/

trade Religious After 1949 x Block 84

North 200 feet of south 300 feet of east

half of block Fort Concho

Gable roof, Brick

piers, open

wood supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 951 x x x x Domestic Domestic 1927-1931 x Block 55

South 111.3 feet of West 44.2 feet of

lot 2 Fort Concho

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall

1

(west),

1 1/2

east 6,850 x x x x x

Commerce/

trade Government 1927 to 1931 x Block 61 Fort Concho x x

Inset under

precast concrete

columns Rectangular 1 x x x x x x

Industry/

processing;

commerce/

trade

Government/

educational 1931 to 1949 x Block 62 West 170 feet of Lot 1 Fort Concho

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Rectangular 1 x x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture Before 1889 US Army x Block 62 Fort Concho x x

Inset under

main roof, wood

posts

T-Plan,

center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 1 x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture

Originally

built 1870-

71;

reconstructe

d on ruins of

original rock

walls in 1951 US Army x Block 60 Fort Concho x x

Inset under

main roof, wood

posts

T-Plan,

center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 1 x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture

Originally

built 1870-

71;

reconstructe

d on ruins of

original rock

walls in 1951 US Army x Block 60 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular;

center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 1 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture

1868, first

fort building

constructed US Army x Block 66 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular;

center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 1 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture

1868, second

fort building

constructed US Army x Block 66 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular

Perimeter

wall x x Government Government 1950 to 1960 x Block 66 Fort Concho

Hipped roof,

wood posts

Center

passage; U-

shaped

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground

2 in

front, 1-

story

rear

wings x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1876 US Army x Block 66 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular 1 x x

Domestic;

commerce/

trade

Domestic;

commerce/

trade

Moved to fort

from its

original

location

downtown in

1951 Oscar Ruffini x Block 66 Fort Concho x x

Shed roof in

front; hipped

roof on sides,

wood posts

Four square

center with

two wings --

overall

rectangular

2, with

1-story

wings x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture

Originally

built 1868 to

1870, rebuilt

in 1980s x Block 84 Fort Concho x x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Rectangular

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 1 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1878-1879 US Army x Block 55 Fort Concho x x

Hipped roof,

wood posts

Modified L-

plan; center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 2 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1871-1872 US Army x Block 55 Fort Concho x x

Hipped roof,

wood posts

Modified L-

plan; center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 2 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1871-1872 US Army x Block 55 Fort Concho x x

Hipped roof,

wood posts

Modified L-

plan,

rectangular

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 2

Partial--

two

storm

cellars in

rear--

south

elev. x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1876-1877 US Army x Block 55 Fort Concho x x

Inset

Modified L-

plan; center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 2 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture Before 1870 US Army x Block 55 Fort Concho x x

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1870 US Army x Block 55 Fort Concho x x

Inset, wood

posts

Modified L-

plan; center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 2 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1869-1870 US Army x Block 55 Fort Concho x x

Shed roof, wood

posts

Center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 2 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1870 US Army x Block 55 Fort Concho x x

Inset, wood

posts

Modified L-

plan; center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 2 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1870 US Army x Block 55 Fort Concho x x

Hipped roof,

wood posts

Modified L-

plan; center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 2 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1870-1875 US Army x Block 55 Fort Concho x x

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Inset under

main roof, wood

posts

Rectangular;

center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 1 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1869 US Army x Block 60 Fort Concho x x

Inset under

main roof, wood

posts

Rectangular;

center

passage

24-inch rock

wall, base

on ground 1 x x x x x x

Government;

Defense

Government;

educational;

recreation/

culture 1869 US Army x Block 60 Fort Concho x x

Inset Bungalow 1 x x x x

Government;

Defense Vacant Before 1889 US Army x Fort Concho x x

25,080 x x x x

Agriculture;

Industry/proce

ssing 1927 to 1931 Block 62 Lots 13 and 14 Fort Concho x

Rectangular

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1

25 feet

long by

17 feet

wide 874 x x x x x x

Commerce/

trade Vacant

c. 1920 to

1949 x 15 Lots 24, 25 and 26 Millspaugh x x

Center

passage

Slab,

perimeter

wall 1

25 feet

long by

17 feet

wide 874 x x Domestic Vacant 1931 to 1949 x 15 Lots 24, 25 and 26 Millspaugh

Rectangular

Slab,

concrete

floor 1 1,000 x x x x x x

Industry/

processing

Industry/

processing;

commerce/

trade 1931 to 1949 x 68 Lots 6 and 7 Fort Concho x x

Rectangular 1 5,000 x x x x x x

Industry/

processing

Industry/

processing;

commerce/

trade 1931 to 1949 x 68 Lots 6 and 7 Fort Concho x x

Concrete stoop Four square

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,364 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic 1906 x Block 82 South 100 feet of Lot 16 Fort Concho x x

Shed roof, wood

posts, exposed

rafter tails Rectangular Slab 1 379 x x Domestic Domestic unknown x Block 82 South 100 feet of Lot 16 Fort Concho

Shed roof, stone

box columns,

handicapped

ramps west and

east Rectangular

Slab

(concrete

floor),

perimeter

wall 1 x x

Industry/

processing Government 1920 to 1927 x Block 62 Lots 10 and 11 Fort Concho

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Metal mansard-

style awning

over door Rectangular

Slab

(concrete

floor),

perimeter

wall 1 x x x x

Industry/

processing Government 1920 to 1927 x Block 62 Lot 6 Fort Concho x

Gable roof, brick

piers, tapered

box supports Bungalow

Pier-and-

beam 1 1,050 x x x x x x Domestic Domestic

After 1949,

c. 1950s x x 20 1/2 West 120 feet of Lot 7 Fort Concho

Rectangular

Pier-and-

beam 1 448 x Domestic Domestic After 1949 x 20 1/2 West 120 feet of Lot 7 Fort Concho

Shed roof, wood

posts

Center

passage

Pier-and-

beam 1 900 x x Domestic Domestic After 1949 x 20 1.2 West 120 feet of Lot 7 Fort Concho

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Period of Significance

Nat

iona

l Sig

nific

ance

Stat

ewid

e Si

gnifi

canc

e

Loca

l Sig

nific

ance

Contributing to Possible NR

District or Multi-Property

Areas of Significance Brief History/Alterations and Additions/ Other Information

1939-1961 x x x

WPA building, re-building

after '36 flood

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture

This house appears to be older than

Sanborn Maps indicate, so it may have

been moved to this location after 1949

and before survey in 1985.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Addition now being constructed on east

elevation.

1930s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood Front porch enclosed.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Prairie architecure

Brick veneer and fixed windows added

at some point, probably.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood Frame addition west elevation.

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture

1930s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

May have been altered to have Spanish

Eclectic appearance.

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture Garage shown on 1920 Sanborn Map.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1940s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Attached carport, east elevation, and air

conditioning unit on roof of carport. This

house appears older than 1950s, maybe

moved here after 1949?

Garage added on west elevation and

later converted to living space.

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Vertical wood siding, double carport

west elevation and handicapped ramp

south elevation all added.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood Masonite siding added.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood Asbestos siding added.

Built as San Angelo Baptist Church

before 1927, by 1931 it became Park

Heights Baptist Church. T-addition in

rear (south elev) built between 1931 to

1947. Contemporary stone addition to

east built after 1947.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

This is either a '20s house that has been

added onto and remodeled, or a house

built in the mid-20th century.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood Porch altered and new siding added.

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1940s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1940s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Attached carport with hipped roof on

east end of south elevation.

1930s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Built-in single-car carport on west end

of south elevation.

1940s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1940s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1930s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

(community development

and ethnic heritage)

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1930s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

(community development

and ethnic heritage)

Looks like contemporary exterior.

1920s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

(community development

and ethnic heritage)

1920s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

(community development

and ethnic heritage)

Appears to be contemporary

construction.

Appears to be completely contemporary

construction. On site of adobe Mexican

American dance hall built between 1920-

27.

1950s-1961 x x

Post-war growth and mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development)

If this building was built in 1950s, it is

medium priority as a mid-century

entertainment venue. If it is more

recent than 1965 construction, it is low

priority or non-contributing.

Store here with wood posts, built

between 1931 to 1949.

1920s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

(community development

and ethnic heritage)

1950s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

(community development

and ethnic heritage)

This duplex could have been built more

recently than 1965. If so, it would be

low priority or non-contributing.

Metal building added to north of stucco

building.

1920s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

(community development

and ethnic heritage)

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

(community development

and ethnic heritage);

vernacular architecture

Small addition west end and shed

additions in rear.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

This is either non-contributing

contemporary building or a house built

in the 1920s covered with new materials

and alterations.

Gable on west end of south elevation

may gave been added over porch;

French door added on south elevation.

1930s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

vernacular architecture

1920s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Single-story addition on west end added

between 1931 and 1949.

1920s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Appears to have been major alterations

made to house--brick veneer may have

been added and porch altered with

arched entry added, shed addition in

rear.

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Craftsman details may have been added

to older folk, gable-front-and-wing

house.

Nice example of 60s Ranch-style house,

low priority because of age.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture

1900-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Queen Anne architecture

This house appears to be older than the

1927 to 1931 shown on Sanborn Maps.

Perhaps it was moved here from another

location during that time period.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1900-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

vernacular Eastlake-inspired

architecture

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Front door enclosed and window added,

date unknown

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

This house might have been a frame

bungalow that was veneered with brick

and given a Spanish Eclectic

appearance.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920-1961 x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

The 1931 Sanborn Map shows a house

and detached storage with brick veneer

in this location. However, the style of

this house looks more like 1950s ranch,

and appraisal district says it was built in

1955. Perhaps earlier house was

remodeled later to reflect Ranch style.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

House and garage shown on 1931

Sanborn Map and both are labeled

"veneered."

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

May have been added onto on east

elevation, and porch appears to have

been altered.

1910-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Mission architecture

House and detached garage are labeled

"veneered" on 1931 Sanborn Map.

Stucco may have been added later.

1920-1961 x x

Middle building: 1920s oil

boom (community

development and industry)

and industrial architecture:

Other two: Post-war growth

and mid-20th century oil

boom (community

development and industry) Small addition on east end.

1950s-1961 x x

Post-war growth and mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development)

Small addition on north elevation, west

end.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1940s-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

1900-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Detached garage is also shown on 1920

Sanborn Map. Second-story rear

addition, date built unknown.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

Carport added on east elevation,

windows may have been changed, dates

unknown.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture

1900-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture

Original tapered columns replaced,

companion house to 119 W. Avenue B.

1900-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Craftsman architecture Companion house to 115 W. Avenue B.

Front covered with brick, date unknown.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican-

American neighborhood,

Tudor Revival architecture

Originally a duplex, now single family.

Carport on east elevation, shed addition

in rear, sliding glass door added to west

elevation, window altered in front (south

elevation).

1910-1961 x x

Post-railroad boom and

Prairie architecture

Could have been built before 1920 as

Park Hotel, and then moved south to

corner between 1927 and 1931 to make

room for South Texas Lumber Company.

1950-1961 x x

Mid-20th century oil boom,

Art Deco archtecture

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican

American neighborhood,

Mission architecture Two additions on west elevation.

1930-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican

American neighborhood Addition on east elevation.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1930-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican

American neighborhood

Small additions north and south.

National Register nomination submitted

after 1985 survey mentions a few

shotgun houses in barrio at West

Avenue D and Hill Street. This is one of

two remaining, and the other is

condemned.

Addition on east side of front, or south

elevation. This house is condemned by

the city as unsound. It is one of two

remaining shotgun houses located along

Avenue D, between Hill and Randolph.

Door opening filled in, sliding windows

added, new siding, dates unknown.

1920-1961 x x

Development of a Mexican

American neighborhood

Originally built as office for G.E. Pratt &

Co. Lumber Yard; carport added west

elevation.

Sanborn Maps from 1920 to 1949 show

dwelling in this location with same

footprint as this building.

Metal part of building looks like it was

added to northeast of original

block/brick/stucco building.

West end built as Ice house.

Metal addition north elevation.

Built as medical sale warehouse,

became feed store by 1949.

1930-1961 x x

Post war growth and Mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce); Moderne

architecture

Shown on 1949 Sanborn Map as

restaurant built of concrete block. Had

grand opening as McIntire's Drive-In on

Sept. 12, 1952.

1940s-1961 x x

Post war growth and Mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce); Moderne

architecture

Appears on 1949 Sanborn Map as a beer

warehouse.

1900-1961 x x x Transportation, architecture

HABS TEX 226-SANA 1. Railroad

companies in Texas used designs that

evolved from Richardsonian

Romanesque to Mission detail around

1900.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1950-1961 x x

Post war growth and Mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce)

1910-1961 x x

Post railroad boom

(community development)

1940-1961 x x

Post war growth and Mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce); Moderne

architecture

Built as a movie theater with air

conditioning.

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

1950s-1961 x x

Post war growth and Mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce); Moderne

architecture

1950s-1961 x x

Post war growth and Mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce)

1940s-1961 x x

Post war growth and Mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce)

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

This building could be made up of two or

more historic buildings constructed in

the late 1920s. In 1931, the building on

the corner was a veterinary clinic and

the building to the north was a store. In

1949, the building on the corner was a

restaurant and the building to the north

was a furniture shop. Or, this could be

more contemporary construction and

non-contributing to a historic period.

1950s-1961 x x

Post war growth and Mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce)

This building could be more

contemporary construction and non-

contributing.

1980s-

present x x

Historic preservation,

revitalization, and cultural

initiatives (community

development and recreation)

1930s-

present x x

WPA Building (community

development and recreation),

Pueblo Revival architecture

Currently undergoing rehabilitation

(2011).

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1940s-1961 x x

Post war growth and Mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce); post-war

modern architecture and

drive-in mid-20th century

drive-in culture

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development and

commerce); Art Deco

architecture and mid-20th

century drive-in culture

Built as feed store, then was warehouse,

by 1948, was part of Jack Kelly's Drive-

in Restaurant next door to north at 502

S. Chadbourne.

1920s-1961 x x

Post railroad boom, 1920s oil

boom (community

development and

commerce); 1920s

commercial architecture

1920s-1961 x x

Post railroad boom, 1920s oil

boom (community

development and

commerce); 1920s

commercial architecture

1910-1961 x x

Post railroad boom

(community development

and commerce); Early 20th

century commercial

architecture

Built as a grocery store, by 1931 was a

tin shop.

1920s-1961 x x

Post railroad boom, 1920s oil

boom (community

development and

commerce); 1920s

commercial architecture

Looks as though interior was totally

destroyed by fire after 1985 survey.

1930s-1961 Built as tractor sales and service.

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development), Mission

architecture

Built as a feed store with retail on

northwest corner. By 1949, was a coffee

warehouse and roastery.

1900-1961 x x x Transportation, architecture

Railroad companies in Texas used

designs that evolved from Richardsonian

Romanesque to Mission detail around

1900.

1990s-

present x x

Historic preservation,

revitalization and cultural

initiatives (community

development and ethnic

heritage).

1990s-

present x x

Historic preservation,

revitalization and cultural

initiatives (community

development, recreation, and

ethnic heritage).

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

Appears to be remaining building from a

frozen foods company plant that

occupied most of north half of Block 14.

1940s-1961 x x

Post-war growth and mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development)

1990s-

present x x

Historic preservation,

revitalization, and cultural

initiatives (community

development, recreation, and

ethnic heritage).

1940s-1961 x x

Post-war growth and mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development)

Frist bank in San Angelo, original

location may have been 113 S.

Chadbourne St. Moved to 705 S. Oakes

St. across from Fort Concho. Moved to

this site May 23, 1995. Destroyed by

tornado May 28, 1995 and rebuilt with

original front wall preserved.

Original location was 418 W. Twohig,

moved to Hartgrove Ranch near

Millersview in late 1960s, moved here in

March 1999. Restoration complete in

2000.

Original location was corner of MLK

Blvd. and 14th St. Moved here in May

2003, rehabilitation completed in 2004.

Original location was 412 Preusser St.

Moved here in May 2001, restoration

complete in 2002.

Original location was 200 or 300 block

of West Concho Ave. Moved here in

1994 and used as public restrooms until

2002. Rehabbed for office occupancy in

2003 to 2004.

1990s -

present x x

Historic preservation,

revitalization, and cultural

initiatives (community

development and art)

Curved roofline built to resemble a

conestoga wagon.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1940s-1961 x x

Post-war growth and mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and industry)

Remains of old Banner Creameries.

Front or east building was creamery,

west builsing was creamery and

warehouse.

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development and

commerce); Art Deco

architecture

Became a service station between 1931

and 1949.

1940s-1961 x x

Post-war growth and mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce)

1940s-1961 x x

Post-war growth and mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development

and commerce)

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development and commerce)

Building in area as early as 1908. In

1931 and 1949 this was a plumbing

shop.

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development and

commerce); Moderne

architecture

1930-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development and

transportation); engineering

and architecture Built for Tom Green County.

1920s-1961 x x

Post-railroad boom, 1920s oil

boom (community

development and

commerce); Moderne

architecture

First Troy Laundry building constructed

between 1908 and 1913, just north of

current building. Troy Laundry opened

by Bledsoe family in 1908.

Addition on east, maybe added a half-

story above.

1920s-1961 x x

Post-railroad boom, 1920s oil

boom (community

development); Craftsman

architecture

According to owner, this house was built

for the owner of Troy Laundry and his

family, the Bledsoes.

1920s-1961 x x

Post-railroad boom, 1920s oil

boom (community

development); Craftsman

architecture

According to owner, this house was built

for Dr. Caroe, an early optical doctor in

San Angelo. A screen-in stucco porch

with brackets over west end may have

been added.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development); Prairie

architecture

Lumber from S.L. Ogle Lumber Yard,

which was located next door to west.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development)

Second floor, balcony, and Palladian

window on west elevation all added.

According to neighbor Mrs. Gilman, this

house was home of Mrs. Probant,

president of the first garden club in San

Angelo and once had 3 lily ponds behind

the house that the current owners have

filled in.

This park may be eligible for

listing in the National

Register of Historic Places in

2017, when it is 50 years old

Land donated to city by Rio Concho

Manor; fragrance garded added 1989.

1960s x x

Post-war growth and mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development);

architecture, and association

with Houston Harte, when

the west wingbecomes 50

years old in 2014.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development); vernacular

architecture

This house exemplifies rural setting that

many of the early houses in Fort Concho

addition probably had. It's hard to trace

this location on Sanborn Maps, and

house appears to be older than 1920s.

Looks like an old hall-and-parlor folk

house with some Craftsman detail added

later.

Brick veneer probably added after 1949,

rear shed addition.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development)

AC unit on roof, two-story rear addition

with side gabled roof.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development)

1950-1961 x x

Mid-20th century oil boom

(community development)

Rear and west elevation now being

insulated and weatherized through an

"ARRA" grant.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1920-1961 x x

Post military era and

development, post-railroad

boom (community

development); Craftsman

architecture Shed addition and carport in rear.

1930-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development); vernacular

Tudor Revival architecture

Part of this house could have been built

before 1920, but it was enlarged and

veneered between 1927 and 1931. A

second-floor gable and exterior staircase

added to west elevation.

1920-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development) Rear shed addition.

1920-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development); Craftsman

architecture Rear shed addition.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development, post railroad

boom (community

development); Craftsman

architecture

Second floor added between 1927 and

1931 (shown on Sanborn Maps). Rear

shed addition. House is suffering from

extreme neglect, the front is tilting onto

the porch.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development); vernacular

architecture

Shed addition on east rear; shed plus

two other shed add-ons on west rear.

Wood shed addition on west side with

vertical plank walls and corrugated

metal roof.

House has new siding, porch appears

like it's been remodeled, windows

replaced, addition on east end.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development); Craftsman

architecture

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development)

Rear shed addition, windows replaced,

siding replaced, porch changed.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development, post railroad

boom (community

development); Craftsman

architecture

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development, post railroad

boom (community

development)

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development); Prairie

architecture Rear addition.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development, post railroad

boom (community

development)

Shed addition west side, front bay

window replaced, porch altered.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development, post railroad

boom (community

development); Queen Anne

architecture

1920-1961 x x

Post railroad boom

(community development);

Craftsman architecture

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development, post railroad

boom (community

development), Craftsman

architecture

According to owner, this was home of

first railroad master for KCM&O

Railroad.

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

Two-story addition in rear with metal

windows.

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development)

This house appears to be late 19th

century to early 20th century, yet never

appears on Sanborn maps. Perhaps it

was moved here after 1949 from

another location. If this house is original

to this location, it should be high

priority. Rear addition.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development); Queen Anne

architecture

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development)

Metal addition on westt elevation--1,200

square feet.

1910-1961 x x

Post military era and

development, post railroad

boom (community

development)

Built as a garge with capacity of 36 cars,

had electric lights and stove heat in

1920. Originally site of a lumber yard.

Built as hay and feed stores.

1910-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development); Queen Anne

architecture

Major alterations: brick veneer added,

windows replaced, doors new, two-story

addition in rear.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development); Queen Anne

architecture

Built as a fencing warehouse.

Built as a hardware and grocery

business. Major aleterations: appears

that stucco and metal exterior coverings

have been added recently.

1930-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development); vernacular

architecture with unusual

materials

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

Alterations: New windows, mansard-

type overhangs on porch and over

windows.

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

Alterations: New siding, new windows,

added cottage-rustic trim

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

Alterations: new windows. House and

porch do not appear to be level.

May have been built between 1927-31,

with major alterations later: brick

veneer and new windows.

Alterations: new siding, new windows.

Alterations: siding, new windows.

Attached carport, west elevation.

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

Alterations: siding, new windows, porch

supports.

1950s-1961 x x

Post war growth and mid-

20th century oil boom

(community development)

This house appears to be older than

1950s, could have been moved here

from another location after 1949. Rear

shed addition. Alterations: siding and

porch.

1930-1961 x x

Post 1936 flood,

Development of San Angelo

Boy Scouts (social history)

When it first appears on 1949 Sanborn

Map, this building is shown as a Boy

Scout hut. It was probably built after

the Boy Scout village flooded in 1936.

1910-1961 x x

Development of KCM&O

Railroad (transportation)

Garage added in front with hipped roof.

Either contemporary construction or

older house with alterations.

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development, post railroad

boom (community

development)

11/24/1909: Mechanic's lien for $1,100

for Lucy Clay and J.E. Shelton to build a

6-room frame house. Concrete siding

added after 1985 survey and front

window replaced and size of opening

changed.

1930-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development)

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development, post railroad

boom (community

development) Rear shed addition, siding changed.

1930-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development) Alterations: new siding, new windows.

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development) Porch has been altered

1940s-1961 x x

Post war growth (community

development)

May have been built as Craftsman with

pyrimidal hipped roof and remodeled

into Ranch with an addition on east end.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1940s-1961 x x

Post war growth (community

development)

House appears to be older form than

1950s, may be older house moved here

after 1949. May have rear addition with

roof extended over it.

1940s-1961 x x

Post war growth (community

development) New siding, windows, and shutters.

Been county maintenance yard since

1930s.

1930s-1961 x x

Development of wool

industry in Tom Green

County (agriculture,

industry)

Located in block labeled as "city tool

yard" in 1931 with a railroad spur

running through it.

Built as part of Santa Rita Wool Co.,

Wool Warehouse No. 2.

1930s-1961 x x

Development of wool

industry in Tom Green

County (agriculture,

industry)

1949 Sanborn Map: Located in block

owned by Santa Rita Wool Co., and is

labeled as "Wool Warehouse No. 4."

1930s-1961 x x

Development of wool

industry in Tom Green

County (agriculture,

industry)

1949 Sanborn Map: Located in block

owned by Santa Rita Wool Co., and is

labeled as "Warehouse No. 5." Railroad

spur runs through block.

1930s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom

(transportation and

industry); 1930s Moderne

commercial architecture Built as a motor freight station.

One of several houses built on grounds

of Fort Concho from 1908 to 1940s.

Now only one remaining. Several

alterations: new siding, new windows,

new door.

1920s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom,

Development of wool

industry in Tom Green

County (community

development, agriculture,

industry); 1920s

commercial/industrial

architecture

Building on east built as Texas

Stockmen Supply Co., where there was

feed grinding and mixing and a wool

warehouse. Building on west was built

as San Angelo Grocery Co. wholesale

grocery, and by 1949 became a

wholesale beer business.

Built as a sash and door warehouse on

site of Concho Ball Park, which was

located on north end of Block 62 from

early 1900s to after 1931. What looks

like a new exterior keeps this building

from being a Medium or High priority.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

Used by Wool Growers Central Storage

Co. for many years--they may have

added limestone top onto brick.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

Several modifications made over the

years, both exterior and interior, now

restored to its original appearance.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement Addition on east end in back, 1936.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

Used as officer's quarters by bachelors--

limestone duplex for two to four officers

without families.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

1961 fire destroyed second floor and

staircase, subsequently restored.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

Ruins have been stabilized; exhibit

shows how walls constructed.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

There have been modifications and

alterations over the years, but non-

original elements have been removed.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement Intact interior.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement Has had interior modifications.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

Addition on west end for Commanding

Officer's office, built by Commander

Grierson; South el added for kitchen.

Limestone for buildings quarried in

vicinity.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

Extensive modifications throughout 20th

century, combined into Monarch Tile

Plant in '30s or '40s, now restored

except for two original rear mess-hall

wings that made building a U-shape.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

Extensive modifications throughout 20th

century, combined into Monarch Tile

Plant in '30s or '40s, now restored

except for original rear mess-hall wing

that made building a T-shape.

1850-1874;

1875-1899 x x x x

Military;

exploration/settlement

Modified over years into a small stucco

bungalow in a neighborhood near the

fort. Carport added to west end. Several

modifications from original one room 18-

feet by 25-feet listed in 1889 inventory.

This building could be restored and

added to Fort Concho National Register

District.

1927 - 1961 x x

Development of wool

industry in Tom Green

County (agriculture,

industry) Built as a wool warehouse.

1910-1961 x x

Post railroad boom

(community development);

1920s oil boom (commerce);

Moderne architecture

Old service station. This corner became

a tourist camp with a service station by

1931 that was gone in 1949.

This house could have been constructed

as part of the tourist camp that was on

this corner from c. 1928 until 1949.

1930s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development and industry),

Mission architecture

Built as a machine shop, and is still a

machine shop and store today.

1930s-1961 x x

1920s oil boom (community

development and industry),

1930s industrial architecture

1900-1961 x x

Post military era and

development (community

development); vernacular

architecture

Shed addition in rear. Metal addition to

north that connects to outbuilding

behind 408 Porter.

1920s-1961

Built as part of Wool Growers Central

Storage Co. New contemporary façade

added, or would be high priority.

City of San Angelo, Texas Phase II Survey of

Historic Resources

2011

1920s-1961 x x

Development of wool

industry in Tom Green

County (agriculture,

industry)

Built as part of Wool Growers Central

Storage Co. New contemporary façade

added, or would be high priority.

This house appears to be older than

1950s--Sanborn Maps show a brick

veneer house here after 1931--could

brick veneer be covered by asbestos?

Looks like it originally was a garage,

maybe. Looks older than 1949, so may

have been moved here.

13

3

25

13

8

3

2

1618

19

151

221/2

211/2

20 1/2

2120

7775

6867

6971

50

49

4847

C

A

1

1

7

6

A

16

12

31

23

150

4

5

16

214

84

66

92

81

80

94

93

91

89

85

88

65

64

63

6261

6059

58 5756

55

78

2423

15 14

19

B

8

9

6 70

74

82

83

79

24

17

9086

87

17

17

20

32

11

9

10

39

40

A

7 76

D2

COPE AD.

MCCRARY S/D

SCOTTS/D

L. M. CASTERSRE-S/D

MILLSPAUGHS

/DC.A

. HAT

CH

ER

S

LYNN, B

AILEY &

PAUL S/D

FORT CONCHO ADDN.

FORT CONCHO

ADDN.

FORT CONCHO

ADDN.J A MILLERS/D

S/DLOVE'S

NEELY'S

S/D

J. J

. SH

EP

PAR

DS

S/D

FOR

T C

ON

CH

O A

DD

N.

FORT

CONCHO

FORT CONCHO RIVER LOTS

CONCHO

ADDN.

FORT

CONCHO

ADDN.

FORT

CONCHO

ADDN.

DABNEY & EDWARDS S/D

J.S.EDWARDS

S/D A. B. COX

CITY PARK

S/D

ADDN.

FRARY

ADDN.

SAMPSON S/D

ANGELO

MAIN

TOWN

BLOCKCATHOLIC CHURCH

F.T. BEAVER

RE-S/D

ADDN.

FORT CONCHO

RIVER LOTS

FORRESTER &BAILEY S/D FORT

MILLSPAUGH

ADDN

SAN ANGELO ADDN.

MILES ADDN.

SAN ANGELO ADDN.

SAN ANGELO ADDN.

SAN ANGELO ADDN.

SAN ANGELO ADDN.

AB

BO

TTE

LLE

NJ.

D.

SH

IPM

AN

S

BAKER ST

HENRY O FLIPPER ST HENRY O FLIPPER ST

S C

HA

DBO

UR

NE

ST

S O

AK

ES

ST

SANTA FE PARK DR

RIO CONCHO DR

RIO CONCHO DR

W CONCHO AVE

W CONCHO AVE

S C

HAD

BOU

RN

E S

T

BU

RG

ES

S S

T

S IR

VIN

G S

TS

IRV

ING

ST

S IR

VIN

G S

T

BAKER ST

E AVENUE D

WO

OL

ST

RU

ST

ST

W TWOHIG AVE

W TWOHIG AVE

E TWOHIG AVE

E HARDEMAN PASS

BAKER ST

RU

ST

ST

BAKER ST

S M

AG

DALE

N S

T

CO

UR

T S

T

S O

AKE

S S

T

E HIGHLAND BLVD

ALLEN ST

PO

WE

LL S

T

RU

ST

ST

E AVENUE C

E AVENUE D

BIRD

ST

E AVENUE D

E AVENUE C

W AVENUE D

E WASHINGTON DR

W AVENUE A

W AVENUE B

HIL

L S

T

WEBB

ST

S B

RO

WN

ING

ST

S O

AKES ST

PA

RS

ON

S S

T

HIL

L S

T

S D

AV

ID S

T

HIL

L S

T

S R

AN

DO

LPH

ST

W HARDEMAN

PASS

RUST ST

PO

WE

L L S

T

S O

AK

ES

ST

W HAR

DEM

AN

PASS

S C

HA

DB

OU

RN

E S

TS

CH

AD

BO

UR

NE

ST

W HARRIS AVE

W BEAUREGARD AVE

E TWOHIG AVE

S E

ME

RIC

K S

T

S M

AG

DALE

N S

T

S IR

VIN

G ST

PORTER ST

BIRD ST

ALLEN ST

E WASHINGTON DR

BU

RG

ES

S S

T

W WASHINGTON DR

W AVENUE D

W WASHINGTON DR

W AVENUE C

W AVENUE A

E WASHINGTON DR

E AVENUE D

S C

HA

DB

OU

RN

E S

T

S D

AV

ID S

T

ALLEN ST

RU

ST

ST

E AVENUE AE AVENUE A

E HIGHLAND BLVD

PA

RS

ON

S S

T

E AVENUE C

PO

WE

LL S

T

E AVENUE A

OR

IEN

T S

T

W AVENUE B

W AVENUE C

S R

AN

DO

LPH

ST

S O

AK

ES

ST

DU

GG

AN

ST

W HARRIS AVE

N IR

VIN

G S

T

LOVE ST

E CONCHO AVE

W CONCHO AVE

W TWOHIG AVE

W HARRIS AVEW 1ST ST

MA

RTIN

LUTH

ER

KING

DR

S R

AN

DO

LPH

ST

S IR

VIN

G ST

S IR

VIN

G ST

S R

AN

DO

LPH

ST

S K

OE

NIG

HE

IM S

T

W AVENUE B

S A

BE

ST

S A

BE

ST

S A

BE S

T

S ABE

ST

S A

BE

ST

RA

MP

WEBB

ST

HIL

L S

T

W AVENUE C

W AVENUE D

S O

AKES ST

S O

AKE

S S

T

S C

HAD

BOU

RN

E S

T

S C

HA

DB

OU

RN

E ST

S K

OE

NIG

HE

IM S

TS

KO

EN

IGH

EIM

ST

S K

OE

NIG

HE

IM S

TS

KO

EN

IGH

EIM

ST

RIO

CONCHO DR

RIO

CONCHO DR

RIO

CONCHO DR

RIO

CONCHO DR

SURBER DRSURBER DRSURBER DRSURBER DRSURBER DR

W 1ST ST

W 1ST ST

W 1ST ST

W 1ST ST

ME

TC

ALF

E S

T

NEFFS WAY

E BEAUREGARD AVE

W BEAUREGARD AVE

E BEAUREGARD AVE

W RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DR

W RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DR

Section I

Section II Section III

Section V & IV

7

9

76

5

3

6

2

9

3

6

1

8

64

2

9

4

9

8

8

8

6

7

8 9

14

8

5

54

1

6

1

3

2

1234

2

4

7

5

3

5

7

9

7

3

2

9

3

7

8

5

1

6

1

4

1

6

8

8

28

1

8

7

6

8

5

6

8

3

5

7

4 4

29

2

94

7

1

5

3

5

2

13

6

6

3

7

7

1

8

4

3

3

3

9

4

6

8

1

5

1

7

2

9

9

1

88

1

6

1

8

6 8

4

4

5

2

5

4

57

5

7

87

6

5

3

1

5

1

9

2

68

1

8 3

8

9

13

674

57

234

9

9

1

A

4

6

B

1

6

2 9

3

57

5

5

8

56

1 3

4

546

1

8

4

4

1

3

7

3

8

9

83

2

2

6

6

9

2

4

6

3

9

2

8

4

9

1

3

1

123

6

5

9

4

2

1

8

9

3 2

3

6

4

6

4

4 6

6

5

87 9

6

9

6

14

1

46

7

4

1

4

5

4

5

2

6

9

4

1

3

2

51

6

2

3

6

2

4

1

9

3 5

9

6

4

9

67

9

5

7

9

8

12

431

1

2

87

432

1

3 5

9

5

3

1

7

6

2

16

5

7

3

2

4

4

8 7654

8

23

9

2

7

7

789

77

5

2

3

1 2 3 4

1

8

3

9

2

8

1

7

8

6

1

789

13

2

2

3

3

2

76

4

1

5432

5

8

5

45

1

4

3

3

8

LJ

17

7

31

7

1

9

45

98

1

8

7

5 7

8

3

6

4 6

2

2

2

5

I2

6 59

9

5

F

1

98

7

3

4

6

1

6

97

6

A

4

6

3

7

4

9

9

872

2

54

2

3

7

6

EF

2

3

4

7

2

1

5

9

1

6

2

5

8

234

3

H

7

15

8

5

83

75

2

4

8

4

1

96

F

9

5

86

4

KI

2

5

H

32

9

4

98

12

7

8

7

3

8

2

1

1

45

13

89

7

9

5

9

21

876

5

1

6

59

1

2

5

3

5

97

3

9

13

6 9

64

1

875

13

2013

29

10

15

14

18

16

14

19

18

11

25

27

1113

18

14

20

12

15

12

10

13

21

12

23

15 19

12

17

17

1615

20

26

28

1617

11

11

10

21

18

14

10

11

13

30

15

12

19

2223

24

19

17

24

1211

14

22

11

19

20

10

18

25

2A

1817

17

1113

13

15

2011

11

18

19

10

1516

12

1513

15

18

12

10

10

19

19

17

1315

19

1411

16

18

20

16

13

20

17

16

17

10

1614

14

20

1113

10

15

2018

17

10

13

12

101214

14 1512

10

1018

1715

11

1614

14

19

12

19

12

14

15

13

15

11

15

11

10

20

10

1013

13

11

11

11

23

23

1510

1716

15

13

11

181716

14

19

14 1816

12

1513

19

17

12

18 17 16 15

20

1817

18

11

10

16

20

11

12

1310

12 15 14 13 12 11

20

25

14

17

15

12

16 15

13

15

11

13

11

18

1513

11

13

20

11

18

13

11

12

10

12

2213

14

17

16

14

11

18

19

20

10

1712

12

14

14

10

17

16

15

17

14

10

18

10

12

14

23

10

16

11

10

15

11121311

20

14

11

131211

1918

17

15

14

12

14

1214

10

16

10

15

10

24

24

11

11

181716

19

1713

10

1416

12

10 11

44

11

10

13

12

20

10

16

12

12

12

1718

1110

14

1212

18

161718

14

16

14

12

21

10

1614

11

10

12

16

201918

1917

17

10

17

18

15 13

14

20

10

17

15

19

10

13

24

1613

11

10

2221

1315

27

12

10

1615

12

17

11

11

13

11

11

10

16

12

14

12 1015

16

15

12

16

20

16

14

21

17

14

12

16

14

14

16

25

29

14

13

11

14 12

10

10

1811

15

15

22

11

13

16

14

1A

13

30

15

131211

13

13

19 20

2628

10

21

12

15

15

2423

18

15 1011

1316

10

19

151614

13

1211

Park

Section Boundary LineSurvey Boundary

8

1618

19

151

221/2

211/2

20 1/2

2120

75

6971

49

4847

150

5

6 70

74

152 7

17

7

9

76

NEELY'S

S/D

J. J

. SH

EP

PAR

DS

S/D

FOR

T C

ON

CH

O A

DD

N.

FORT

CONCHO

F.T. BEAVER

RE-S/D

MILLSPAUGH

ADDN

S IR

VIN

G S

TS

IRV

ING

ST

S IR

VIN

G S

T

W AVENUE D

W AVENUE A

W AVENUE B

HIL

L S

TH

ILL

ST

HIL

L S

T

S R

AN

DO

LPH

ST

W HARDEMAN

PASS

W HA

RDEM

AN

PASS

W WASHINGTON DR

W AVENUE A

W AVENUE B

W AVENUE C

S R

AN

DO

LPH

ST

S IR

VING

ST

S R

AN

DO

LPH

ST

S K

OE

NIG

HE

IM S

T

HIL

L S

T

W AVENUE C

W AVENUE D

S K

OE

NIG

HE

IM S

TS

KO

EN

IGH

EIM

ST

S K

OE

NIG

HE

IM S

TS

KO

EN

IGH

EIM

ST

W RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DRW RIVER DR

44 43 42 41 40

34 35 36 37 38 39

33 32 31 30 29

23 24 25 26 27

28Ú Ú

22 21 20 19 18 17 16

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

6 7

1

5 4 3 2

Ú

Ú

Ú

Ú Ú Ú Ú

45 46 47 48

50 49

51 52 53 54 55

Ú

56

57A 57C

57B

58 59 60 61

62 63

67

66

65

64

71 70 69 68

Ú

Ú ÚÚ

72 73 74 75

84 83 82 81 80 79

76 77 78

Ú

117

116115

114

113

110 111 112

108 107

106Ú Ú

105102 103 104

101 100 99 98

Ú ÚÚ

Ú

90 89

91 92 93 94 95 96 97

88

85

ÚÚ

87

86

Ú

118

121

Ú

Ú

123

130 Ú

131

134Ú

109

KIDY Fox

Mayfield Paper

Coney

Girl Scouts

Mobile Maintenance

Maximus Night Club

Restaurant & Bar

Griffin Interiors

Rebecca Alvarado Martin

ABBOTT LAMOINE

Daniels Insulation

YMCA

Steven Perry

Kent Elliot Roofing

Satellite

Mueller

Storage

9

8

45

1

7

4

3

3

7

18

1

6

1

7

6

5

6

1

1

4

2 9

57

7

28

5

3

5

1 3

46

1

4

5

6

5

9

2

8

3

3

4

8

4 6

6

8

6

4

4

1

1

6

7

3

6

7

5

2

5

1

2 7

9

2

3

9

5

6

9

4

8

12

4

9

8

7

23

2

9

1 3

2

7654

8

9

1

77

5

2

3

1 2 3 4

1

8

6

2

8

1

7

7

8

9

4

5

8

2

6

9

3

4

5

6

3

9

2

6 5

98

7

3

3

7

1 3

9

9

234

7

7

6

5

8

3

4

8

15

8

5

5

9

64

3

4

5

2

1

102A

17

1018

15

10

10

1013

13

11

11

17

10

12

16

10

15

14

12

18

14

18

1712

17

10

12

15

1112

13

14

11

11

15

12

1214

10

16

10

13

14

15

12

10

11

17

1416

10 11

13

6A

44

11

10

16

10

18

161718

10

1315

11

11

15

11

16

11

12

16

14

12

14

1213

15

10

11

12

1316

16 1715

2010 Phase IIHistoric Resource Survey(Section I)´

1 inch = 150 feet

City of San AngeloPlanning Division72 W. College AvenueSan Angelo, TX 76903

Landmarked Building (Historic) Resource No.

Survey Boundary Ú High-priority properties

13

221/2

21

7775

6867

69

50

49

78

2423

15 14

70

83

76

SCOTTS/D

L. M. CASTERSRE-S/D

MILLSPAUGH

S/D

C.A

. HAT

CH

ER

S

LYNN, B

AILEY &

PAUL S/D

FORT CONCHO ADDN.

FORT CONCHO

ADDN.

FORT CONCHO

ADDN.J A MILLERS/D

S/DLOVE'S

SAMPSON S/D

F.T. BEAVER

RE-S/D

FORRESTER &BAILEY S/D FORT

ABB

OTT

ELLE

NJ.

D.

SHIP

MA

NS

S O

AK

ES

ST

S I R

VIN

G S

TS

IRV

ING

ST

E HARDEMAN PASS

ALLEN ST

E WASHINGTON DR

S OAKES

ST

W HARDEMAN

PASS

S O

AK

ES

ST

W HA

RDEM

AN

PASS

S C

HA

DB

OU

RN

E S

TS

CH

AD

BO

UR

NE

STW AVENUE A

E WASHINGTON DR

E AVENUE D

S C

HA

DB

OU

RN

E S

T

E AVENUE A

OR

IEN

T S

T

W AVENUE B

W AVENUE C

LOVE STS IR

VING

ST

W AVENUE D

S OAKES

ST

S C

HAD

BOU

RN

E ST

114

113

106

Ú

105Ú

95 96 97

88

ÚÚ

87

86

118

121

119

120B 120A

ÚÚ

Ú

122Ú

123

130

124

125

126

127

128

129

ÚÚ

131

132

133134Ú

154

153

155

152 151

149

150

147

148

Ú

Ú

146

145A145B144

137

138

139

140141142

143

ÚÚÚÚÚÚ ÚÚ

136

Ú

135

159

158157

156

164

163

162

161

Ú160

ÚÚÚÚ

166

165

Ú

167

168

169170

171

Ú

Ú

221

214

215

216

173

174

Ú

Kile

Brest

KIDY Fox

Vega State

Buil

ding

Santa Fe Depot

Smith

River Stage

Mazur

Perez

City of San Angelo

San Angelo Museum Of Fine Arts

Coney

COSA Senior Center

Farmer's Market

El Paseo Pavillion

Los Panchitos Restaurant

Restaurant & Bar

Griffin Interiors

Daniels Insulation

Municipal Swimming Pool Office

Satellite

River Stage Restrooms

Storage

River Stage Consession Stand

5

6

9

8 7

8

3

4

7

3

B

6

4

8

5

6

A

1

1

JA

C

5

2

E

3

5

2 4

4

1

6

5

2

8

9

7

C

A

2

1

5

1

8B

4

1

D

1

1

C

4

B

7

1

5

3

6

7

6

5

4

1

E

67

2

3

5

9

4

7

9

8

7

1

2

B

C

D

2

9

3

C

K

24

B

A

23

8

B

3

6

D

A

6

E

7

789

7

8

9

1

3

4

5

5

8

6

9

3

4

5

6

876

2

LJ

1

7

D

1

6

8

2

3

45

4

5

I

D

F

1

C

D

1

3

9

5

E

9

B

3

9

8

7

7

6

E F

6

5

9

A

2

2

6

3

H

A

G

8

4

MKI

2

HG

9

CD

6

9

45

8

7

9

8

23

1011

10

13

15

14

15

10

12

23

23

11

15

14

10

20

22

10

14

12

21

11

16

26

11

13

14

11

14 16

19

23

12

12

17

19

18

20

23

131211

11

14

10

1112

13

14

24

132412

11

10

11

17

15

25

13

24

13

13

15

22

12

11

20

18

14

14

21

10

22

10

12

16

18

17

19

16

21

10

10

10

17

13

11

12

10

12

12

15

14

16

16

25

2411

10

11

13

12

1213

10

1112

2010 Phase IIHistoric Resource Survey(Section II)´

1 inch = 150 feet

City of San AngeloPlanning Division72 W. College AvenueSan Angelo, TX 76903

Landmarked Building (Historic) Resource No.

Survey Boundary Ú High-priority properties

84

66

80

65

64

63

6261

6059

58 5756

55

83

79

FORT

CONCHO

FORT

CONCHO

DABNEY & EDWARDS S/D

J.S.EDWARDS

FORT

BAKER ST

HENRY O FLIPPER ST HENRY O FLIPPER ST

S O

AK

ES

ST

BU

RG

ES

S S

T

BAKER ST

E AVENUE D

WO

OL

ST

RU

ST

ST

RU

ST

ST

RU

ST

ST

E AVENUE C

S O

AK

ES

ST

PORTER ST

BIRD ST

E WASHINGTON DR

BU

RG

ES

S S

T

E WASHINGTON DR

RU

ST

ST

E AVENUE A

DU

GG

AN

ST

ME

TCA

L FE

ST

159

158

166

272 271 270 269 268 267 266 265 264 263

ÚÚÚÚÚÚÚÚÚÚ

273 274Ú Ú 255 256Ú Ú

252A 254 252B

Ú251

Ú

276

253

221

220

197

196

195 ÚÚ198

199Ú211

219

218217

Ú

Ú231 230 229 228 227 226

Ú

242

233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240

241

243

257

258 259

244

245

246

247

Ú

Ú

ÚÚ 261

248

262

249

Ú

Ú250

State Building

SAISD Maintenance

Church

Willis Permian Movers

Barracks 1 Barracks 2 Sea Arrow Marine

San Angelo ISD

LOVELACE ROBERT & E A JANEK

Santa Rita Wool Co.

Headquarters

Commissary Bldg

Quartermaster Bldg

Officers Quarters 1

Ruffin Bldg

1

9

2

4

69

1

6

5

8

38

3

6

2

8

3

1

C

A

5

9

5

4

4

4

2

3

4

1

9

3 5

6

4

E

31

8

7

1

5

9

2

7

79

1

2

3

4

1

1

7

5 7

D

B

4 6

2

2

5

D

F

4 6

E

97

A

87

2

54

B

3

6

7 83

96

F

5

86

2 9

9

8

8

7

C

10

13

11

11

10

15

12

14

16

10

12

14

13

11

10

10

11

11 10

13

12

12

12

12

15 13

14

1613

10

11

10

12 1014

11

10

12

14

11

13

13A

2010 Phase IIHistoric Resource Survey(Section III)´

1 inch = 150 feet

City of San AngeloPlanning Division72 W. College AvenueSan Angelo, TX 76903

Landmarked Building (Historic) Resource No.

Survey Boundary Ú High-priority properties

81

8063

82

CONCHO

ADDN.

FORT

FORT CONCHO

BAKER ST

RIO CONCHO DR

RIO CONCHO DR

BAKER ST

BAKER ST

RU

ST

ST

BIRD ST

WEBB

ST

RUST ST

ALLEN ST

WEBB

ST

SURBER DRSURBER DRSURBER DRSURBER DRSURBER DR

253

197

196

195194

193192

191

ÚÚ

Ú

190

189 188 187 186 185 184 183 182 181

Ú ÚÚ

198

199200

201

202

203

205204

Ú

ÚÚ

ÚÚ

225

224

223

222Ú

231 230 229 228 227 226

Ú

233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240

180

Ú

179Ú

232

Hotel

Rio Concho

Robert Massie Funeral Home

RIO CONCHO

WILSON T W & A INC

1

25

1

8

3

6

4 6

6

4

7 83

9

4

5

3

2 9

12

7

6987

5

1718

17

13

10

11

14

12

17

16

15

14

12

20

10

13

12

11

10

18

11

19

15

1614

13

12

11

2010 Phase IIHistoric Resource Survey(Section IV)´

1 inch = 150 feet

City of San AngeloPlanning Division72 W. College AvenueSan Angelo, TX 76903

Landmarked Building (Historic) Resource No.

Survey Boundary Ú High-priority properties

3

1

81

80

82

83

79

D

S/DLOVE'S

FORT CONCHO RIVER LOTS

CONCHO

ADDN.

FORT

CITY PARK

S/D

FORT CONCHO

FORRESTER &BAILEY S/D FORT

SAN ANGELO ADDN.

BAKER ST

BU

RG

ES

S S

T

WO

OL

ST

S M

AGD

ALEN ST

ALLEN ST

BIRD ST

WEBB

ST

S OAKES

ST

S O

AK

ES

ST

E TWOHIG AVE

PORTER ST

BIRD ST

ALLEN ST

ALLEN ST

LOVE ST

WEBB

ST

S OAKES

ST

165

167

168

169170

171

Ú

Ú

276

253

221

220

197

196

195194

193192

191

ÚÚ

Ú

190

189 188 187 186 185 184 183

Ú Ú

198

199200

201

202

203

210

209

208

207

206

205204

ÚÚ

ÚÚÚ

ÚÚ

213

212

214

215

216

211

219

218217

Ú

Ú

Ú233

173

174

Ú

175

176

177

178

ÚÚÚ

180

Ú

179Ú

172

Ú

198B

Hotel

Rio Concho

SAISD Maintenance

Harrison

Western Mattress

Robert Massie Funeral Home

La Concha Apts

Healthy Families of SA

RIO CONCHO

WILSON T W & A INC

Lamar Advertising

Blue Bonnet Homes

7

5

1

9

8

6

2

2

4

3

2

3

7

8

5

5

4

7

6

5

3

C

A

1

4

6

E

1

1

8

3

6

5

D

F

4

1

6

4

B

3

9

2

3

4

9

4

5

3

2

9

8

12

7

7

6

1

9

45

9

5

78

23

69

1

875

10

18

20

15

16

14

15

17

13

14

11

10

11

12

22

21

14

16

16

12

14

16

10

12

10

11

12

13

14

15

11

13

10

1112

10

13

12

11

13A

2010 Phase IIHistoric Resource Survey(Section V)´

1 inch = 150 feet

City of San AngeloPlanning Division72 W. College AvenueSan Angelo, TX 76903

Landmarked Building (Historic) Resource No.

Survey Boundary Ú High-priority properties

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date: September 6, 2011

To: Mayor and Council members

From: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

Subject: Phase II of the Historic Resources Survey

Location: The Phase II survey area is roughly bounded on the north by

the Concho River, on the west by South Koenigheim Street, on the south by Washington Drive, and on the west by Rust Street and the northern portion of the South Orient Railroad

Contacts: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

657-4210

Background: In September 2006, a survey of the northern portion of the Main Street target area was completed. This northern area was encompassed within Phase I of a survey of historic resources for San Angelo. There are numerous potentially historic properties within the southern portion of the Main Street target area, which have not been surveyed since 1986. The survey completed in 1986 was a city-wide survey. A re-evaluation of this 1986 document for those properties falling within the southern portion of the Main Street target area is needed to update the results and determine any errors or omissions. Also, the completion of a survey within this southern portion will provide the City with documented evidence of the existing historic buildings in this area.

Phase II of this survey began in September of 2010, and the

consultant, Mary Saltarelli, has provided the attached draft of this report. This report was accepted by the Historic Preservation Commission at its August 18th, 2011 meeting. The report is due to the Texas Historical Commission to

approve and close out the current grant funding in late September.

Attachments: Phase II survey area map Draft report

Presentation: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

City of San Angelo

Memo Date: August 22, 2011

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director

Subject: Agenda Item for August 30, 2011 and September 6, 2011 Council Meeting

Contact: Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director, 657-4209

Caption: Consideration of an Ordinance amending the Water Conservation/Drought Contingency Plan and any action in connection thereto.

Summary: The proposed ordinance will modify the existing Water Conservation/Drought Contingency Plan by reducing the waste of water runoff provision from 150 feet to 75 feet; establishing designated watering days based on the property address; lowering the allowable usage amount at which rate surcharges are applied; and by increasing surcharge rates. History: The Water Conservation/Drought Contingency Plan establishes practices that encourage conservation and provides a procedure for management of City water supplies during a drought.

Financial Impact: Fees collected from surcharges go into the Water Operating Fund. Related Vision Item (if applicable): Long Term Water Supply Other Information/Recommendation: The proposed changes incorporate the items discussed at previous Council meetings. It is recommended the ordinance be amended. Attachments: Proposed Ordinance and Revised Ordinance based on 8/30/11 City Council meeting Presentation: None Publication: None Reviewed by Service Area Director: Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director, August 22, 2011.

Page 1 of 12

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11, ARTICLE 11.200 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ENTITLED “WATER CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN”, BY REPEALING ARTICLE 11.200 IN ITS ENTIRETLY, AND ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE 11.200, PROVIDING FOR A DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN AND FOR A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABLILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

BE IT ORDANED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

Section 1. That Chapter 11, Article 11.200 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of San Angelo, Texas, entitled “Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plan” is hereby repealed and that a new Article 11.200 entitled “Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plan” is hereby adopted to read as follows:

ARTICLE 11.200 WATER CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN

Sec. 11.201 Purpose

The purpose of the water conservation and drought contingency plan is to encourage water conservation at all times and to establish a procedure for identifying, classifying and handling a water supply and/or a water demand emergency effectively and efficiently.

Sec. 11.202 Water Conservation Measures

The city will utilize the following strategies to encourage, promote and require citizens to conserve water at all times.

(1) Conservation Plan. The “City of San Angelo Water Conservation Plan,” dated March 2, 2009, which is on file in the office of the city clerk, and available for public inspection, is adopted and incorporated herein.

(A) Implementation. The director of water utilities will act as the administrator of the water conservation plan. The administrator will oversee the execution and implementation of all elements of the program and will be responsible for supervising the promulgation and retention of records for program verification.

(2) Plumbing Code. The city plumbing code has provision for water conserving plumbing devices. The city will enforce the requirements of the code to ensure the use of water saving devices.

(3) Universal Metering. All users of municipal treated water, except for fire sprinkler lines, will be metered.

(4) Water Supply Meters. The city metering devices will record water use with an accuracy of plus or minus 5.0% in order to measure and account for the amount of raw water diverted from the source of supply.

Page 2 of 12

(5) Restaurants. Restaurants shall not serve water to their customers except when specifically requested by the customer.

(6) Waste of Water. As defined below shall be prohibited.

(A) Allowing treated city water, raw city water, grey water, reclaimed water or well water to run off property to a gutter, street, alley, ditch or drainage facility and drain for more than 75 feet downgrade of the point of entry into such gutter, street, alley, ditch or drainage facility.

(B) Failure to repair a controllable leak.

(7) Prohibited Watering Hours. The use of treated or raw city water for watering lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, golf courses, shrubs or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be prohibited between the hours of 12:00 noon and 6:00 p.m. daily from April 1 through October 31.

(8) Allowable Watering Frequency. The use of treated or raw city water for watering lawns, landscape areas, trees, gardens, golf courses (except greens), shrubs or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be allowed at a frequency of twice every seven days for each area being watered during the period of April 1 through October 31 and once every seven days for each area being watered during the period of November 1 through March 31. Golf course greens may be watered once per day year round.

(9) New Landscape. Watering of newly seeded or sodded lawns or newly planted trees, shrubs or landscape plants will be allowed at the following frequency provided notification is given to the city code compliance division or water conservation division of the watering schedule: (add written notification/ Councilmember Farmer)

(A) Days 1-14 from planting; three times per day every day of such period at any time of day.

(B) Days 15-28 from planting; twice per day every day of such period at any time of day.

(10) Allowable Application Rates. The maximum amount of treated or raw city water applied to established lawns, landscape plants, golf courses (except greens) or shrubs should not exceed 1 inch per week.

(11) Drip Irrigation. Landscape watering with a drip irrigation system shall be permitted on any day and at any time of day provided that the total amount of water applied shall not exceed 1 inch per week. For the purpose of this article, drip irrigation shall mean a water saving irrigation system that uses buried drip pipe or tape.

Page 3 of 12

(12) Excessive Usage Fee. A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts set forth below. This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage.

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $2.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 45,000 and 55,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 55,000 gallons during a billing period.

(B) For residential landscape water meters, an additional fee of $2.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 35,000 and 45,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 45,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all other landscape meters, except those at schools, colleges, parks, cemeteries, golf courses or athletic facilities, an additional fee of $2.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 110,000 and 130,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 130,000 gallons during a billing period.

(13) Contracts with Other Political Subdivisions, Water Supply Corporations or Water Suppliers. Any political subdivision, water supply corporation, or water supplier that contracts with the city for the purchase of water shall adopt applicable provisions of the city’s water conservation and drought contingency plan. Contracts for the sale of water that are already in effect will be revised to reflect the applicable provisions of the city’s most current water conservation and drought contingency plan when the contracts are renewed or extended. To the extent of the city’s legal authority, the city shall require the city’s wholesale customers to issue a public notice advising their water customers of required drought management measures declared in the city as follows in Section 11.203.

(A) In the event that the triggering criteria specified in Section 11.203(e) of the Plan for Water Supply Stage – Drought Level III – have been met, the city manager is hereby authorized to initiate allocation of water supplies on a pro rata basis in accordance with Texas Water Code Section 11.039 and according to the following water allocation policies and procedures.

(B) A wholesale customer’s monthly allocation shall be a percentage of the customer’s water usage baseline. The percentage will be set by resolution of the San Angelo City Council based on the administrator’s assessment of the severity of the water shortage condition and the need to curtail water diversions and/or deliveries and may be adjusted periodically by resolution of the city council as conditions warrant. Once pro rata allocation is in effect, water diversions by or deliveries to each wholesale customer shall be limited to the allocation established for each month.

(C) Upon initiation of pro rata water allocation, water utility director shall provide notice, by certified mail, to each wholesale customer informing them of

Page 4 of 12

their monthly water usage allocations and shall notify the news media and the executive director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

(14) Water Demand Emergency. In the event the quantity of water usage from the city’s water distribution system reaches a level that exceeds the amount which may be treated or safely delivered through the system, the water utilities director shall notify the city manager and the city council of such an occurrence. The city council shall be authorized to limit the use of water by passage of a resolution outlining such limitations which shall remain in effect until the water demand emergency can be met. Upon initiation of a water demand emergency, the water utility director shall provide notice, by certified mail, to the executive director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and shall notify the news media.

(15) Water Supply Emergency. In the event of a water system failure or emergency (i.e. pressure zone deficiencies, chemical spills, broken water mains, power outages, failures of storage tanks or other equipment, treatment plant breakdown and/or water contamination) which limits the amount of water which may be treated or safely delivered through the system, the water utilities director shall notify the city manager and city council of such occurrence. The city council shall be authorized to limit the use of water by passage of a resolution outlining such limitations which shall remain in effect until the water supply emergency can be met. Upon initiation of a water supply emergency, the water utility director shall provide notice, by certified mail, to the executive director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and shall notify the news media.

(16) Public Information. The water utilities director will provide regular public education and information about the importance of year-round water efficiency as delineated in the plan, and will provide general information about water supply conditions and drought plan provisions on at least an annual basis. The purpose of this effort shall be to keep the citizenry informed about the drought and conservation plans and their importance to the city’s water supply.

(17) Watering Days. The days upon which watering is allowed shall be as determined by the property address as set forth in this section for each frequency of watering. Watering on an allowable day may be done during the hours of 12:00 midnight to 12:00 noon, and 6:00 p.m. to 12.00 midnight during the period of April 1 to October 31 and any time of day during the period of November 1 to March 31.

(A) Watering Frequency-Twice every seven days. The designated watering days shall be:

Last Digit of Address Watering Days

0 or 1 Monday, Thursday, Saturday

2 or 3 Tuesday, Friday Sunday

4 or 5 Monday, Thursday Saturday

Page 5 of 12

6 or 7 Tuesday, Friday, Sunday

8 or 9 Monday, Thursday, Saturday

(B) Watering Frequency-Once every seven days. The designated watering day shall be:

Last Digit of Address Watering Day

0 or 1 Monday, Thursday

2 or 3 Tuesday, Friday

4 or 5 Monday, Thursday

6 or 7 Tuesday, Friday

8 or 9 Monday, Thursday

(C) Watering Frequency-Once every fourteen days. The designated watering day shall be:

(1) Week One

Last Digit of Address Watering Day

0 or 1 Monday

2 or 3 Tuesday

4 or 5 Monday

6 or 7 Friday

8 or 9 Thursday

(2) Week Two. No watering allowed.

(18) Residential Vehicle Watering. Washing of vehicles or other equipment is allowed only on a designated watering day. A hose with an automatic shut-off nozzle or bucket of five gallons or less may be used. Water should not be allowed to run off of the property more than 75 feet.

(19) Charity Car Washes. Charity car washes are allowed on any day. A hose with an automatic shutoff nozzle or bucket of five gallons or less may be used. Water should not be allowed to run off the property more than 75 feet.

Sec. 11.203 Drought Stages and Water Management Measures

Page 6 of 12

(a) Water Supply Sources. The city has several water supply sources that it can draw upon to meet its needs. Local surface water sources include Lake Nasworthy, Twin Buttes Reservoir, O.C. Fisher Reservoir and the South Concho River. Nonlocal surface water supplies are available to the city from O.H. Ivie Reservoir and Spence Reservoir. The city also has the Hickory groundwater source in the McCulloch county area.

When local reservoirs are full, the city’s primary water supply will be from these reservoirs along with nonlocal or groundwater sources as needed. When local reservoirs are below full but above drought trigger points, the local sources may be utilized along with water brought in from nonlocal sources or groundwater sources. During drought conditions, the primary source of supply will be nonlocal sources, subject to the maximum amount available from each source, with the remaining amount of water coming from the local sources or groundwater.

(b) Drought Trigger Point. Whenever the total amount of water available to the city falls below the minimum criteria established for each water supply stage level, the city shall be deemed to have entered a drought stage for management of its water supplies.

The water utilities director shall notify the city manager and city council upon entering the threshold of a drought stage. The council shall implement each stage by resolution. Such resolution shall be published one time in the local newspaper. The criteria for each stage and the water management measures which shall be enforced are as follows in subsections (d) to (f).

(c) Public Information. The water utilities director will provide reports to the news media with information regarding current water supply conditions, projected water supply and demand conditions if the current drought conditions continue, and consumer information on water conservation measures and practices. Information describing each water supply stage trigger point and drought level restrictions on water use shall be prepared and published on the city’s website.

(d) Water Supply Stage – Drought Level I.

(1) The minimum criteria for this drought stage shall be the following.

The total amount of water available, as determined by the water utilities director, to the city from its developed water sources is less than a 24-month supply.

(2) In addition to the conservation measures stated in Section 11.202 of this article, the following additional water conservation measures shall be in force during Water Supply Stage – Drought Level I.

(A) The use of treated or raw city water for watering lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, shrubs, golf courses (except greens, tees and athletic fields) or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be prohibited at all times provided however a person may do such watering which shall be once every seven days for each area being watered during the period of April 1 through October 31 and once every 14 days for each area being watered during the period of November 1 through March 31 except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

Page 7 of 12

(B) Golf courses greens may be watered daily.

(C) Tees and athletic fields, except those used only for practice, may be watered twice every seven days except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(D) Watering of newly seeded or sodded lawns, newly planted trees, shrubs, landscape plants or golf course greens or tee areas that have been over-seeded with winter grass or that have been replanted, resodded or newly constructed shall be allowed in accordance with the provisions as stated in Section 11.202 for “new landscape.”

(E) The days upon which watering may be done shall be as specified in Section 11.202(17).

(3) A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts as set forth below.

This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage and shall be in lieu of the “excessive usage fee” as defined in Section 11.202.

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 40,000 and 50,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 50,000 gallons during a billing period.

(B) For residential landscape and raw water meters, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 30,000 and 40,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 40,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all landscape meters, except those at schools, colleges, parks, cemeteries, golf courses or athletic facilities, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 95,000 and 115,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 115,000 gallons during a billing period.

(e) Water Supply Stage – Drought Level II.

(1) The minimum criteria for this drought stage shall be the following.

The total amount of water available, as determined by the water utilities director, to the city from its developed water sources is less than an 18-month supply.

(2) In addition to the conservation measures stated in Section 11.202 of this article, the following additional water conservation measures shall be in force during Water Supply Stage – Drought Level II.

Page 8 of 12

(A) The use of treated or raw city water for watering lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, shrubs, golf courses (except greens, tees and athletic fields) or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be prohibited at all times provided however a person may do such watering which shall be once every fourteen days for each area being watered during the period of April 1 through October 31 and once every 14 days for each area being watered during the period of November 1 through March 31 except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(B) Golf course greens may be watered daily.

(C) Tees and athletic fields, except those used only for practice, may be watered once every seven days except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(D) Hand watering, with a hose that has an automatic shut off nozzle or a bucket of five gallon or less, of newly planted trees or shrubs may be done twice every seven days for sixty days after planting.

(E) Golf course greens that have been over-seeded with winter grass may be watered in accordance with the provisions as stated in Section 11.202 for “new landscape”.

(F) The days upon which watering may be done shall be as specified in Section 11.202(17).

(3) A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts as set forth below.

This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage and in lieu of the water usage fee set out in Section 11.203(d) (3) the “excessive usage fee” as defined in Section 11.202.

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 30,000 and 40,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $8.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 40,000 gallons during a billing period.

(B) For residential landscape or raw water meters, an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 20,000 and 30,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $8.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 30,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all landscape meters, an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 80,000 and 100,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $8.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 100,000 gallons during a billing period.

(f) Water Supply Stage – Drought Level III.

Page 9 of 12

(1) The minimum criteria for this drought stage shall be the following.

The total amount of water available, as determined by the water utilities director, to the city from its developed water sources is less than a 12-month supply.

(2) In addition to the water conservation measures stated in Section 11.202 of this article, the following water conservation measures shall be in force during Water Supply Stage - Drought Level III.

(A) The use of treated or raw city water for watering of lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, golf courses (including greens and tee areas), shrubs or other plants being grown outdoors is prohibited.

(B) The use of treated or raw city water to fill, refill or maintain the level of any fountain or swimming pool is prohibited.

(C) Washing of automobiles, trucks, trailers, boats, or other types of vehicles or mobile equipment is prohibited except if the health, safety and welfare of the public is contingent upon vehicle cleaning, as determined by the director of city health services; then the washing of such vehicles shall be allowed.

(3) A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts as set forth below. This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage and shall be in lieu of the water usage fee set out in Sections 11.203(d)(3) and 11.203(e)(3) and the “excessive usage fee” as defined in Section 11.202.

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 15,000 gallons during a billing period.

(B) For apartment unit accounts, an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over an amount equal to the number of units in the apartment times 3,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all other water users, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage.

Sec. 11.204 Exception and Variance

(a) Exceptions. There shall be an exception to the prohibitions of this article regarding watering restrictions, as follows:

(1) Use of water for installing, testing and repairing sprinkler systems.

(2) Watering days for public parks, athletic facilities, schools, colleges and cemeteries shall be as approved by the City Council.

(b) Variance.

Page 10 of 12

(1) A person desiring an exemption from any provision of this article shall file a petition for variance with the city manager. All petitions for variances shall be reviewed and acted upon by the city council. The petition shall include at a minimum the following information:

(A) Name and address of the petitioner(s).

(B) Purpose and estimated amount of water use.

(C) Specific provision(s) of the article from which the petitioner is requesting an exemption.

(D) Detailed statement as to how the specific provision of the article adversely affects the petitioner or what damage or harm will occur to the petitioner or others if petitioner complies with this article.

(E) Description of the relief requested.

(F) Period of time for which the variance is sought.

(G) Alternative water use restrictions or other measures the petitioner is taking or proposes to take to meet the intent of this article and the effective date of such other measures.

(H) Other pertinent information.

(I) Statement that petitioner has not within the last six months intentionally violated the current ordinance for which a variance is sought or, if such violations have occurred, a statement setting out all reasons why such ordinance was violated.

(2) The city council may grant a variance from the requirements of this article after determining that because of special circumstances applicable to the applicant, compliance with this article:

(A) Cannot be technically accomplished during the expected duration of the water supply shortage or other condition for which the article is in effect; or

(B) Will cause undue hardship on a program or service offered by a public entity; or

(C) Substantially threatens the applicant’s primary source of income.

(3) Additionally, the city council may grant a variance from the requirements of this article if it determines that the applicant can implement alternative water use restrictions which meet or exceed the intent of this article. The city council shall approve specific alternative water use restrictions.

Page 11 of 12

(4) Any variance granted by the city council may be revoked after a determination by the city council that revocation is necessary for the public health and safety or upon a finding that the holder of a variance allowing alternative water use restrictions has not complied with such alternative restrictions.

Sec. 11.205 Implementation and Enforcement

(a) Implementation:

(1) The water utilities director for the city will act as the administrator of the water conservation drought contingency plan. The administrator will oversee the execution and implementation of all elements of the program. He will be responsible for supervising the promulgation and retention of adequate records for program verification.

(2) The water conservation plan will be maintained for the duration of the city’s financial obligation to the state under the State Revolving Loan Fund program.

(b) Contracts With Other Political Subdivisions, Water Supply Corporations or Water Suppliers: Any political subdivision, water supply corporation, or water supplier that contracts with the city for the purchase of water shall adopt applicable provisions of the city’s water conservation and drought contingency plan. Contracts for the sale of water that are already in effect will be revised to reflect the applicable provisions of the city’s most current water conservation and drought contingency plan when the contracts are renewed.

(c) Enforcement: The water conservation and drought contingency plan will be enforced in the following manner:

(1) Water service taps will not be provided to customers not meeting the plan requirements.

(2) The inclining block water rate structure should encourage retrofitting of old plumbing fixtures which use large quantities of water.

(3) Customers who do not pay their water bills will have service discontinued

(4) The building inspection department will not certify new construction which fails to meet the plan requirements.

(5) Persons violating the prohibitions of this article will be subject to prosecution in municipal court.

Sec. 11.206 Penalty

It shall be unlawful to violate any of the prohibitions contained in this article. Any person violating such prohibitions shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in accordance with the general penalty provision found in Section 1.106 of this code.

Page 12 of 12

Section 2. That the terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective on the 1st day of October, 2011, after publication as required by law.

INTRODUCED on the ______ day of _______________, 2011, and finally PASSED,

APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the _____ day of _______________2011.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM Will Wilde, Director of Water Utilities Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Page 1 of 14

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11, ARTICLE 11.200 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ENTITLED “WATER

CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN”, BY REPEALING ARTICLE 11.200 IN ITS ENTIRETLY, AND ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE 11.200, PROVIDING FOR A DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN AND FOR A PENALTY;

PROVIDING FOR SEVERABLILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

Section 1. That Chapter 11, Article 11.200 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of San Angelo, Texas, entitled “Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plan” is hereby repealed and that a new Article 11.200 entitled “Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plan” is hereby adopted to read as follows:

ARTICLE 11.200 WATER CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN

Sec. 11.201 Purpose

The purpose of the water conservation and drought contingency plan is to encourage water conservation at all times and to establish a procedure for identifying, classifying and handling a water supply and/or a water demand emergency effectively and efficiently.

Sec. 11.202 Water Conservation Measures

The City will utilize the following strategies to encourage, promote and require citizens to conserve water at all times.

(1) Conservation Plan. The “City of San Angelo Water Conservation Plan,” dated March 2, 2009, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, and available for public inspection, is adopted and incorporated herein.

(A) Implementation. The Director of Water Utilities will act as the administrator of the water conservation plan. The administrator will oversee the execution and implementation of all elements of the program and will be responsible for supervising the promulgation and retention of records for program verification.

(2) Plumbing Code. The City plumbing code has provision for water conserving plumbing devices. The City will enforce the requirements of the code to ensure the use of water saving devices.

(3) Universal Metering. All users of municipal treated water, except for fire sprinkler lines, will be metered.

Page 2 of 14

(4) Water Supply Meters. The city metering devices will record water use with an accuracy of plus or minus 5.0% in order to measure and account for the amount of raw water diverted from the source of supply.

(5) Restaurants. Restaurants shall not serve water to their customers except when specifically requested by the customer.

(6) Waste of Water. As defined below shall be prohibited.

(A) Allowing treated city water, raw city water, grey water, reclaimed water or well water to run off property to a gutter, street, alley, ditch or drainage facility and drain for more than 100 feet downgrade of the point of entry into such gutter, street, alley, ditch or drainage facility.

(B) Failure to repair a controllable leak.

(7) Prohibited Watering Hours. The use of treated or raw city water for watering laws, gardens, landscape areas, trees, golf courses, shrubs or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be prohibited between the hours of 12:00 noon and 6:00 p.m. daily from April 1 through October 31.

(8) Allowable Watering Frequency. The use of treated or raw city water for watering lawns, landscape areas, trees, gardens, golf courses (except greens), shrubs or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be allowed at a frequency of twice every seven days for each area being watered during the period of April 1 through October 31 and once every seven days for each area being watered during the period of November 1 through March 31. Golf course greens may be watered once per day year round.

(9) New Landscape. Watering of newly seeded or sodded lawns or newly planted trees, shrubs or landscape plants will be allowed at the following frequency provided written notification is given to the City Code Compliance Division or Water Conservation Division of the watering schedule.

(A) Days 1-14 from planting; three times per day every day of such period at any time of day.

(B) Days 15-28 from planting; twice per day every day of such period at any time of day.

(10) Allowable Application Rates. The maximum amount of treated or raw city water applied to established lawns, landscape plants, golf courses (except greens) or shrubs shall not exceed 1 inch per week.

(11) Drip Irrigation. Landscape watering with a drip irrigation system shall be permitted on any day and at any time of day provided that the total amount of water applied shall not exceed 1

Page 3 of 14

inch per week. For the purpose of this article, drip irrigation shall mean a water saving irrigation system that uses buried drip pipe or tape.

(12) Excessive Usage Fee. A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts set forth below. This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage.

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $1.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 30,000 and 39,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $2.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 405,000 and 505,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 505,000 gallons during a billing period.

(B) For residential landscape water meters, an additional fee of $1.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 20,000 and 29,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $2.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 305,000 and 405,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 405,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all other landscape meters, except those at schools, colleges, parks, cemeteries, golf courses or athletic facilities, an additional fee of $1.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 90,000 and 109,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $2.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 110,000 and 130,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 130,000 gallons during a billing period.

(13) Contracts with Other Political Subdivisions, Water Supply Corporations or Water Suppliers. Any political subdivision, water supply corporation, or water supplier that contracts with the City for the purchase of water shall adopt applicable provisions of the City’s water conservation and drought contingency plan. Contracts for the sale of water that are already in effect will be revised to reflect the applicable provisions of the City’s most current water conservation and drought contingency plan when the contracts are renewed or extended. To the extent of the City’s legal authority, the city shall require the city’s wholesale customers to issue a public notice advising their water customers of required drought management measures declared in the city as follows in Section 11.203.

(A) In the event that the triggering criteria specified in Section 11.203(g) of the Plan for Water Supply Stage – Drought Level IV – have been met, the City Manager is hereby authorized to initiate allocation of water supplies on a pro rata basis in accordance with Texas Water Code Section 11.039 and according to the following water allocation policies and procedures.

(B) A wholesale customer’s monthly allocation shall be a percentage of the customer’s water usage baseline. The percentage will be set by resolution of the San Angelo City Council based on the administrator’s assessment of the severity of the water shortage condition and the need to curtail water diversions and/or deliveries and may be adjusted

Page 4 of 14

periodically by resolution of the City Council as conditions warrant. Once pro rata allocation is in effect, water diversions by or deliveries to each wholesale customer shall be limited to the allocation established for each month.

(C) Upon initiation of pro rata water allocation, the Water Utilities Director shall provide notice, by certified mail, to each wholesale customer informing them of their monthly water usage allocations and shall notify the news media and the Executive Director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

(14) Water Demand Emergency. In the event the quantity of water usage from the City’s water distribution system reaches a level that exceeds the amount which may be treated or safely delivered through the system, the Water Utilities Director shall notify the City Manager and the City Council of such an occurrence. The City Council shall be authorized to limit the use of water by passage of a resolution outlining such limitations which shall remain in effect until the water demand emergency can be met. Upon initiation of a water demand emergency, the Water Utilities Director shall provide notice, by certified mail, to the Executive Director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and shall notify the news media.

(15) Water Supply Emergency. In the event of a water system failure or emergency (i.e. pressure zone deficiencies, chemical spills, broken water mains, power outages, failures of storage tanks or other equipment, treatment plant breakdown and/or water contamination) which limits the amount of water which may be treated or safely delivered through the system, the Water Utilities Director shall notify the City Manager and City Council of such occurrence. The City Council shall be authorized to limit the use of water by passage of a resolution outlining such limitations which shall remain in effect until the water supply emergency can be met. Upon initiation of a water supply emergency, the Water utilities Director shall provide notice, by certified mail, to the Executive Director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and shall notify the news media.

(16) Public Information. The Water Utilities Director will provide regular public education and information about the importance of year-round water efficiency as delineated in the plan, and will provide general information about water supply conditions and drought plan provisions on at least an annual basis. The purpose of this effort shall be to keep the citizenry informed about the drought and conservation plans and their importance to the City’s water supply.

(17) Watering Days. The days upon which watering is allowed shall be as determined by the property address as set forth in this section for each frequency of watering. Watering on an allowable day may be done during the hours of 12:00 midnight to 12:00 noon, and 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight during the period of April 1 to October 31 and any time of day during the period of November 1 to March 31.

(A) Watering Frequency as set forth under “Water Conservation Measures”, Section 11.202(8). The designated watering days shall be:

Page 5 of 14

Last Digit of Address Watering Days

Odd Number Monday, Thursday, Saturday

Even Number Tuesday, Friday, Sunday

(B) Watering Frequency as set forth under the various water supply stages of “Drought Stages and Water Management Measures”, Section 11.203.

(1) Twice every seven days. The designated watering days shall be:

Last Digit of Address Watering Days

Odd Number Monday, Thursday, Saturday

Even Number Tuesday, Friday, Sunday

(2) Once every seven days. The designated watering days shall be:

Last Digit of Address Watering Days

Odd Number Monday, Thursday

Even Number Tuesday, Friday

(3) Once every fourteen days. The designated watering days shall be:

(a) Week One

Last Digit of Address Watering Days

Odd Number Monday, Thursday

Even Number Tuesday, Friday

(b) Week Two. No watering allowed.

(18) Hand Watering. Hand watering may be done on an allowable watering day provided it is done utilizing a hose with an automatic shut-off nozzle or a bucket of five gallons or less except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(19) Residential Vehicle Watering. Washing of vehicles or other equipment is allowed only on an allowable watering day. A hose with an automatic shut-off nozzle or bucket of five gallons or less may be used. Water should not be allowed to run off the property more than 100 feet.

Page 6 of 14

(20) Charity Car Washes. Charity car washes are allowed on any day. A hose with an automatic shut-off nozzle or bucket of five gallons or less may be used. Water should not be allowed to run off the property more than 100 feet.

Sec. 11.203 Drought Stages and Water Management Measures

(a) Water Supply Sources. The City has several water supply sources that it can draw upon to meet its needs. Local surface water sources include Lake Nasworthy, Twin Buttes Reservoir, O.C. Fisher Reservoir and the South Concho River. Nonlocal surface water supplies are available to the City from O.H. Ivie Reservoir and Spence Reservoir. The City also has the Hickory groundwater source in the McCulloch county area.

When local reservoirs are full, the City’s primary water supply will be from these reservoirs along with nonlocal or groundwater sources as needed. When local reservoirs are below full but above drought trigger points, the local sources may be utilized along with water brought in from nonlocal sources or groundwater sources. During drought conditions, the primary source of supply will be nonlocal sources, subject to the maximum amount available from each source, with the remaining amount of water coming from the local sources or groundwater.

(b) Drought Trigger Point. Whenever the total amount of water available to the City falls below the minimum criteria established for each water supply stage level, the City shall be deemed to have entered a drought stage for management of its water supplies.

The Water Utilities Director shall notify the City Manager and City Council upon entering the threshold of a drought stage. The council shall implement each stage by resolution. Such resolution shall be published one time in the local newspaper. The criteria for each stage and the water management measures which shall be enforced are as follows in subsections (d) to (g).

(c) Public Information. The Water Utilities Director will provide reports to the news media with information regarding current water supply conditions, projected water supply and demand conditions if the current drought conditions continue, and consumer information on water conservation measures and practices. Information describing each water supply stage trigger point and drought level restrictions on water use shall be prepared and published on the City’s website.

(d) Water Supply Stage – Drought Level I.

(1) The minimum criteria for this drought stage shall be the following.

The total amount of water available, as determined by the Water Utilities Director, to the City from its developed water sources is less than a 24-month supply.

(2) In addition to the conservation measures stated in Section 11.202 of this article, the following additional water conservation measures shall be in force during Water Supply Stage – Drought Level I.

Page 7 of 14

(A) The use of treated or raw City water for watering lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, shrubs, golf courses (except greens, tees and athletic fields) or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be prohibited at all times provided however a person may do such watering which shall be once every seven days for each area being watered during the period of April 1 through October 31 and once every 14 days for each area being watered during the period of November 1 through March 31 except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(B) Golf course greens may be watered daily.

(C) Tees and athletic fields, except those used only for practice, may be watered twice every seven days except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(D) Watering of newly seeded or sodded lawns, newly planted trees, shrubs, landscape plants or golf course greens or tee areas that have been over-seeded with winter grass or that have been replanted, resodded or newly constructed shall be allowed in accordance with the provisions as stated in Section 11.202 for “new landscape.”

(E) The days upon which watering may be done shall be as stated in Section 11.202(17).

(3) A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts as set forth below.

This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage and shall be in lieu of the “excessive usage fee” as set out in Section 11.202(12).

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $2.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 25,000 and 34,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 4035,000 and 5045,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 5045,000 gallons during a billing period.

(B) For residential landscape and raw water meters, an additional fee of $2.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 15,000 and 24,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 3025,000 and 4035,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 4035,000 gallons during a billing period.

Page 8 of 14

(C) For all other landscape meters, except those at schools, colleges, parks, cemeteries, golf courses or athletic facilities, an additional fee of $2.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 75,000 and 94,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 95,000 and 115,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 115,000 gallons during a billing period.

(e) Water Supply Stage – Drought Level II.

(1) The minimum criteria for this drought stage shall be the following.

The total amount of water available, as determined by the Water Utilities Director, to the City from its developed water sources is less than an 18-month supply.

(2) In addition to the conservation measures stated in Section 11.202 of this article, the following additional water conservation measures shall be in force during Water Supply Stage – Drought Level II.

(A) The use of treated or raw City water for watering lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, shrubs, golf courses (except greens, tees and athletic fields) or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be prohibited at all times provided however a person may do such watering which shall be once every fourteen days for each area being watered except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(B) Golf course greens may be watered daily.

(C) Tees and athletic fields, except those used only for practice, may be watered once every seven days except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(D) Hand watering, with a hose that has an automatic shut-off nozzle or a bucket of five gallons or less, of newly planted trees or shrubs may be done once every seven days for sixty days after planting.

(E) Golf course greens that have been over-seeded with winter grass may be watered in accordance with the provisions as stated in Section 11.202 for “new landscape”.

(F) Drip irrigation shall be allowed at a frequency of once every fourteen days on the allowable watering days.

(G) The days upon which watering may be done shall be as stated in Section 11.202(17).

Page 9 of 14

(3) A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts as set forth below.

This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage and in lieu of the water usage fee set out in Section 11.203(d)(3) and Section 11.202(12)

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 20,000 and 29,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 30,000 and 40,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $8.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 40,000 gallons during a billing period.

(B) For residential landscape or raw water meters, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 10,000 and 19,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 20,000 and 30,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $8.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 30,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all other landscape meters, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 60,000 and 79,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 80,000 and 100,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $8.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 100,000 gallons during a billing period.

(f) Water Supply Stage – Drought Level III.

(1) The minimum criteria for this drought stage shall be the following.

The total amount of water available, as determined by the Water Utilities Director, to the City from its developed water sources is less than a 15-month supply.

(2) In addition to the conservation measures stated in Section 11.202 of this article, the following additional water conservation measures shall be in force during Water Supply Stage – Drought Level III.

(A) The use of treated or raw City water for watering lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, shrubs, golf courses or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be prohibited except for the following:

(1) Golf course greens may be watered daily.

Page 10 of 14

(2) Athletic fields, except those used only for practice, may be watered once every seven days except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(3) Hand watering of trees may be done once every fourteen days with a hose that

has an automatic shut-off nozzle or a bucket of five gallons or less except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(B) The days upon which watering may be done shall be as stated in Section 11.202(17).

(3) A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts as set forth below.

This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage and in lieu of the water usage fee set out in Sections 11.203(d)(3), 11.203(e)(3) and 11.202(12).

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 15,000 and 24,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 25,000 and 35,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $9.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 35,000 gallons during a billing period.

(B) For residential landscape or raw water meters, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 5,000 and 14,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 15,000 and 25,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $9.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 25,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all other landscape meters, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 60,000 and 79,000 gallons during a billing period; an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 80,000 and 100,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $9.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 100,000 gallons during a billing period.

(g) Water Supply Stage – Drought Level IV.

(1) The minimum criteria for this drought stage shall be the following.

The total amount of water available, as determined by the Water Utilities Director, to the City from its developed water sources is less than a 12-month supply.

(2) In addition to the water conservation measures stated in Section 11.202 of this article, the following water conservation measures shall be in force during Water Supply Stage - Drought Level IV.

Page 11 of 14

(A) The use of treated or raw City water for watering lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, golf courses (including greens and tee areas), shrubs or other plants being grown outdoors is prohibited.

(B) The use of treated or raw City water to fill, refill or maintain the level of any fountain or swimming pool is prohibited.

(C) Washing of automobiles, trucks, trailers, boats, or other types of vehicles or mobile equipment is prohibited except if the health, safety and welfare of the public are contingent upon vehicle cleaning, as determined by the Director of City Health Services; then the washing of such vehicles shall be allowed.

(3) A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts as set forth below. This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage and shall be in lieu of the water usage fee set out in Sections 11.203(d)(3), 11.203(e)(3), 11.203(f)(3) and 11.202(12).

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 15,00010,000 gallons during a billing period.

(B) For apartment unit accounts an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over an amount equal to the number of units in the apartment times 3,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all other water users, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage.

Sec. 11.204 Exception and Variance

(a) Exceptions. There shall be an exception to the prohibitions of this article regarding watering restrictions, as follows:

(1) Use of water for installing, testing and repairing sprinkler systems.

(2) Watering days for public parks, athletic facilities, schools, colleges and cemeteries shall be as approved by the City Council.

(b) Variance.

(1) A person desiring an exemption from any provision of this article shall file a petition for variance with the City Manager. All petitions for variances shall be reviewed

Page 12 of 14

and acted upon by the City Council. The petition shall include at a minimum the following information:

(A) Name and address of the petitioner(s).

(B) Purpose and estimated amount of water use.

(C) Specific provision(s) of the article from which the petitioner is requesting an exemption.

(D) Detailed statement as to how the specific provision of the article adversely affects the petitioner or what damage or harm will occur to the petitioner or others if petitioner complies with this article.

(E) Description of the relief requested.

(F) Period of time for which the variance is sought.

(G) Alternative water use restrictions or other measures the petitioner is taking or proposes to take to meet the intent of this article and the effective date of such other measures.

(H) Other pertinent information.

(I) Statement that petitioner has not within the last six months intentionally violated the current ordinance for which a variance is sought or, if such violations have occurred, a statement setting out all reasons why such ordinance was violated.

(2) The City Council may grant a variance from the requirements of this article after determining that because of special circumstances applicable to the applicant, compliance with this article:

(A) Cannot be technically accomplished during the expected duration of the water supply shortage or other condition for which the article is in effect; or

(B) Will cause undue hardship on a program or service offered by a public entity; or

(C) Substantially threatens the applicant’s primary source of income.

(3) Additionally, the City Council may grant a variance from the requirements of this article if it determines that the applicant can implement alternative water use restrictions which meet or exceed the intent of this article. The city council shall approve specific alternative water use restrictions.

Page 13 of 14

(4) Any variance granted by the City Council may be revoked after a determination by the City Council that revocation is necessary for the public health and safety or upon a finding that the holder of a variance allowing alternative water use restrictions has not complied with such alternative restrictions.

Sec. 11.205 Implementation and Enforcement

(a) Implementation:

(1) The water utilities director for the city will act as the administrator of the water conservation drought contingency plan. The administrator will oversee the execution and implementation of all elements of the program. He will be responsible for supervising the promulgation and retention of adequate records for program verification.

(2) The water conservation plan will be maintained for the duration of the city’s financial obligation to the state under the State Revolving Loan Fund program.

(b) Contracts With Other Political Subdivisions, Water Supply Corporations or Water Suppliers: Any political subdivision, water supply corporation, or water supplier that contracts with the City for the purchase of water shall adopt applicable provisions of the City’s water conservation and drought contingency plan. Contracts for the sale of water that are already in effect will be revised to reflect the applicable provisions of the City’s most current water conservation and drought contingency plan when the contracts are renewed.

(c) Enforcement: The water conservation and drought contingency plan will be enforced in the following manner:

(1) Water service taps will not be provided to customers not meeting the plan requirements.

(2) The inclining block water rate structure should encourage retrofitting of old plumbing fixtures which use large quantities of water.

(3) Customers who do not pay their water bills will have service discontinued

(4) The Building Inspection Department will not certify new construction which fails to meet the plan requirements.

(5) Persons violating the prohibitions of this article will be subject to prosecution in municipal court.

Sec. 11.206 Penalty

Page 14 of 14

It shall be unlawful to violate any of the prohibitions contained in this article. Any person violating such prohibitions shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in accordance with the general penalty provision found in Section 1.106 of this code.

Section 2. That the terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective on the 1st day of October, 2011, after publication as required by law.

INTRODUCED on the ______ day of _______________, 2011, and finally PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the _____ day of _______________2011.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:

___________________________________

Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM

_________________________________ _________________________________

Will Wilde, Director of Water Utilities Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

City of San Angelo

Memo Date: September 1, 2011

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Lisa Marley, Human Resources Director

Subject: Agenda Item for September 6, 2011 Council Meeting

Contact: Lisa Marley, Human Resources Director, 657-4221

Caption: Employee Wellness Program update and direction from City Council on how to address non-participation in the health risk assessment (HRA) and health screening.

Summary: Staff will provide an update of the progress thus far with the newly instituted Wellness Program. Staff is also seeking direction on how to address the non-participation in the health risk assessment and health screening by employees covered by the City health insurance. History: In December 2010, as part of the RFP for operation of the Employee Health Clinic, San Angelo Community Medical Center proposed employing Christy Nesbitt, RN, as the Wellness Coordinator to administer the requested Wellness Program for City of San Angelo employees. The first step in developing a wellness program is to assess the health of the workforce. This can be accomplished through a health risk assessment (HRA) and health screening (lab blood work). The Wellness Program was launched on August 1, 2011, with HRAs and health screenings occurring one day per week throughout August and September 2011. During the month of August 2011, a total of 428 HRAs have been completed and 270 health screenings have been performed by San Angelo Community Medical Center staff. Once all City insured employees have completed the HRAs and health screening, the Wellness Program will become voluntary and the program will offer specific needs based on the trends identified in the health screenings. Employees have asked that the City find ways to lower the health insurance premiums. Excessive health benefit costs are a direct result of the health risks of the covered members. If employees are healthier by participating and this helps lower the premiums that employees pay for the insurance this can be a win-win for everyone. The Employee Insurance Review Committee having seen the value that an HRA can make toward insurance plans, agreed unanimously to mandate participation in the program. However recognizing that the laws in this area are constantly changing, recent rulings in the courts prevent employers from mandating participation in HRAs for those employees covered by employer provided health insurance plans. Instead of mandating participation, the laws allow employers to raise the total premiums by up to 20% for those employees who refuse to participate. Financial Impact: The cost for the HRA and health screening is already included in the contract with San Angelo Community Medical Center to operate the Employee Health Clinic. Other Information: None. Attachments: None. Reviewed by Service Area Director: Lisa Marley, Director of Human Resources, Sept 1, 2011.

City of San Angelo

Memo Date: September 1, 2011

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Lisa Marley, Human Resources Director

Subject: Agenda Item for September 6, 2011 Council Meeting

Contact: Lisa Marley, Human Resources Director, 657-4221

Caption: Early Retiree Reinsurance Program (ERRP) Update

Summary: Included in the health insurance reform law is a provision that establishes the temporary Early Retiree Reinsurance Program (ERRP) through the Department of Health and Human Services. This provision addresses the recent erosion in the number of employers providing health coverage to early retirees. The program provides needed financial help for employer-based plans to continue to provide valuable coverage to plan participants and provides financial relief to plan participants. History: In June 2010, the City of San Angelo learned of the opportunity to apply for the ERRP and in July 2010, submitted an application for the program. Acceptance was received on August 31, 2010. Following the 2010 open enrollment period, the Human Resources Department worked to fulfill the requirements of processing a claim for ERRP funds. The sorting and reporting of “eligible” claims is daunting and HR is simply not staffed to handle the magnitude of work surrounding this program. In April 2011, an agreement was discussed with Blue Cross/Blue Shield (BC/BS) to contract their services for this program. In May 2011 the agreement was signed. Since May 2011, no claims have been submitted to ERRP for funding due to a wide variety of reporting issues surrounded with BC/BS. The ERRP will reimburse plans 80% for certain individual claims that reach the “cost threshold” of $15,000 and are under the “cost limit” of $90,000. Eligible claims by early retirees (those age 55 but not yet eligible for Medicare) must be for chronic and high-cost conditions for which $15,000 or more in health benefit claims are likely to be incurred during a plan year by one participant. Financial Impact: Unknown at this time. Other Information/Recommendation: Once claims are processed by ERRP and the City receives funds, Human Resources will present the checks to the City Council and seek direction on the distribution of the funds. According to the Health & Human Services rules, the ERRP must be used for both of the following:

• To reduce the employer’s premium or health benefit costs, and • To reduce health benefit premium contributions, co-payments, deductibles, coinsurance or

other out-of-pocket costs, or any combination of these costs, for plan participants. Attachments: Calendar of events since application was made for ERRP funding. Reviewed by Service Area Director: Lisa Marley, Director of Human Resources, Sept 1, 2011.

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22

ERRP application made available online.

23 24 25 26

27 28 29 30

2010

June

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 COSA submitted ERRP application.

8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2010

July

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30 31 ERRP approval received.

2010

August

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 COSA registered on ERRP website.

23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30

2010

September

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19 20 21 22 23

24 25 26 27 28 29 30

31

2010

October

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27

28 29 30

2010

November

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 Benefits Clerk assigned designee on ERRP website.

2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30 31

2010

December

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 Banking info established on ERRP website.

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 Discussion with Holmes-Murphy re: accessing info from BC/BS

13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 31

2011

January

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 Emailed Holmes-Murphy about access to BC/BS.

8 BC/BS emailed instructions for access.

9 10 Started pulling claims to designate eligibility based on coded requirements. This lasted until April 2011.

11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28

2011

February

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28 29 30 31

2011

March

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

17 18 Discussed difficulties pulling claims & asked for approval to pay BC/BS $16000 to handle.

19 20 21 22 23

24 25 26 Asked BC/BS to remove indemnification portion of agreement.

27 28 29 30

2011

April

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2 BC/BS still making adjustments to agreement.

3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 Signed agreement sent to BC/BS. Informed next step is COSA to send eligibility list.

14 Eligibility list template received from BC/BS.

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30 31

2011

May

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 2010 Eligibility List submitted to ERRP website.

15 16 17 2011 Eligibility List submitted to ERRP website. 2010 list returned for corrections.

18

19 20 21 BC/BS sent corrected list.

22 Additional corrections made by HR.

23 2011 list returned for corrections.

24 25

26 27 28 29 BC/BS asked about member IDs & problem that creates rejection from ERRP.

30

2011

June

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 Received response from BC/BS on IDs. Made changes to 2010 list and sent to ERRP.

2

3 4 HR asked BC/BS about next step.

5 BC/BS informed HR they were inquiring about next step.

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

17 18 2010 list received from ERRP with more corrections required.

19 Notified BC/BS that same rejections were occurring from ERRP. Corrected list resubmitted to BC/BS.

20 21 BC/BS had not received file. Re-sent. BC/BS reviewed & found what needed to be corrected.

22 23

24 25 26 Asked BC/BS for explanation of confusing response codes.

27 28 Conference call set for 7/29 with BC/BS.

29 Response codes discussed & lists re-sent.

30

2011

July

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1 2 3 4 5 Inquired with BC/BS as to status.

6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16 BC/BS responded that HHS had made changes to reporting.

17 Received list from BC/BS requesting additional info.

18 19 20

21 22 23 24 Informed BC/BS the corrected lists were emailed back to BC/BS. Receipt confirmation received.

25 Awaiting final lists from BC/BS to upload to ERRP website.

26 27

28 29 30 31

2011

August

City of San Angelo Parks & Recreation

Memorandum Date: September 2, 2011

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Carl White, Parks and Recreation Director

Subject: Agenda Item for August 30, 2011, Council Meeting

Contact: Carl White, Parks and Recreation Director, 657-4450 or 234-1724

Caption: Regular Agenda Item

Discussion and possible action on the consolidation of various City Boards and Commissions – Parks & Recreation Department.

Summary: The Parks & Recreation Department facilitates the following boards and commissions: Park Commission, Recreation Advisory Board, Civic Events Board, Senior Services Advisory Board, Fairmount Cemetery Board, Fort Concho Museum Board and Public Art Commission. Each of the boards or commissions has discussed possible consolidations or modifications. Staff also has recommendations; they are as follows:

• Recreation Advisory Board – The Recreation Advisory Board is an advisory board to the City Council as to matters of policy and to the City Manager and the Recreation Manager as to administrative matters in regard to creating and managing recreation programs for the City.

o Board’s Opinion: The Board supports the creation of a consolidated Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Board members understand that such a consolidation does not assure their continued service.

o Staff’s Recommendation: Staff strongly concurs.

• Park Commission – (from the ordinance passed on August 4, 1913) The general control and supervision of the parks within the City of San Angelo, now or hereafter to be acquired, is hereby rested in said park commission, and all funds set apart for the maintenance, preservation, improvement and extension of said parks, subject to approval of the City Council shall be under control of said commissioners, any two of whom shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of the business of said park commission.

o Commission’s Opinion: The Commission does not want the scope of its oversight to be diminished in any way. Resignations would likely result if this were to occur. Although this is a matter for legal staff and perhaps the courts to determine, the Commission believes the original Santa Fe Park deeds, that created the Park Commission, intended to have the Commission oversee all City parks, not just Santa Fe Park.

o Staff’s Recommendation: Staff does not want to eliminate the

Park Commission but feels strongly about creating a consolidated Parks and Recreation Advisory Board.

• Civic Events Board – The mission of the Civic Events Division is to provide clean, comfortable facilities along with exceptional support to events in City venues. The Civic Events Advisory Board makes recommendations regarding Civic Events Division policy to the San Angelo City Council.

o Board’s Opinion: There have been many discussions about possibly merging the Civic Events and Convention and Visitors Bureau boards. While some CEB and CVB members favor this approach, most do not, noting that while Civic Events and the CVB often partner, they perform two different missions. Those members also note the CVB markets City facilities other than Civic Events venues (Fort Concho, Texas Bank Sports Complex) along with other venues around town (Cactus Hotel, SAMFA, ASU).

o Staff’s Recommendation: Staff agrees the boards should remain separate entities, believing the CEB is a productive, effective body.

• Senior Services Advisory Board – The Senior Services Board is an advisory board to the City Council as to matters of policy and to the City Manager and the Recreation Manager as to administrative matters with regard to creating and managing the Senior Services program for the City.

o Board’s Opinion: Due to the specific nature of the Board’s oversight, the Board would prefer to make no changes to its composition and duties.

o Staff’s Recommendation: Staff agrees with the Board.

• Fairmount Cemetery Board – The Fairmount Cemetery Board serves as an advisory board to the City in the operation and maintenance of the cemetery.

o Board’s Opinion: Due to the specific nature of the Board’s oversight, the Fairmount Cemetery Board would prefer to make no changes to its current composition and duties.

o Staff’s Recommendation: Staff agrees with the Board.

• Fort Concho Museum Board – The Fort Concho Museum Board is an advisory board to the City in the operation and administration of all the Fort Concho Museum properties of the City.

o Board’s Opinion: Due to the specific nature of the Board’s oversight, the Fort Concho Museum Board would prefer to make no changes to its current composition and duties.

o Staff’s Recommendation: Staff agrees with the Board.

• Public Art Commission – The Public Art Commission is organized and created to advise the City Council on the selection and placement of art on city-owned or -controlled property.

o Commission’s Opinion: Due to the specific nature of the

Commission’s oversight, the Commission would prefer to make no changes to its current composition and duties.

o Staff’s Recommendation: Staff agrees with the Commission.

Financial Impact:

Nominal.

Attachments: None.

Presentation: Verbal.

Publication: N/A.

Reviewed by: Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager, August 19, 2011

Approved by Legal:

N/A.

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date: September 6, 2011

To: Mayor and Council members

From: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

Subject: Board Consolidation – Planning-related

Contacts: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager 657-4210

Background: At the March 22, 2011 City Council meeting, the City Manager proposed a consolidation of boards and commissions, intended to streamline processes and eliminate redundancies. Staff was directed to bring back recommendations to the Council for consideration at a future time. The original options for the proposal of commissions included the formulation of a “Planning & Design Commission”, or the merging of two design-related commissions, the Historic Preservation & River Corridor Commissions. In preparing a staff recommendation, the following items were taken into account: frequency of meetings, duties, skills, and overlap of areas of oversight.

Frequency of meetings: Historic Preservation Commission – cancelled 9 of 12 meetings in 2009, 5 of 12 in 2010, and 5 of 12 in 2011; River Corridor Commission – cancelled 7 of 12 meetings in 2009, 8 of 12 in 2010, and 4 of 12 in 2011;

Common duties that apply to both:

Architectural standards & oversight, recommendations for design documents, maintain inventory of historic properties, public education of historic properties/environmentally sensitive areas/promotion of downtown, advising the Council on matters of concern in their area(s), encourage & guide development.

Backgrounds that could apply to both:

Architecture, engineering/design, historian, realtor/lender, planning, property owner.

Overlap of areas of oversight:

Both the River Corridor and historic properties are concentrated in the vicinity of downtown.

The recommendation formulated by the staff in the Community & Economic Development Department was to combine the River Corridor and Historic Preservation Commissions into a single design commission. Staff took the matter to these commissions to gather their input as directed by Council.

On April 18th, 2011, the Planning Commission discussed the possibilities. There was no clear consensus; two of the five members in attendance did not express a strong preference either way. Two commissioners indicated a preference to combine the River Corridor and Planning Commissions. One commissioner indicated a preference to combine the River Corridor and Historic Preservation Commissions and leave the Planning Commission on its own.

On April 26, 2011, the item was presented for discussion to the River Corridor

Commission. Of the five members in attendance, the consensus was to combine the River Corridor and Historic Preservation Commissions.

On April 28, 2011, the item was presented for discussion to the Historic Preservation

Commission. Of the four members in attendance, the consensus was to not pursue any combination of any of the aforementioned Commissions and leave them all freestanding.

On August 22, 2011, the item was presented for discussion to the Downtown

Development Commission. Of the seven members in attendance, the consensus was to combine the River Corridor and Historic Preservation Commissions and have them act as a subcommittee of the Downtown Development Commission in downtown matters.

Attachments: N/A

Presentation: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

file:///Y|/COUNCIL/Electronic%20Agendas/2011/09-06-11/Proc%20-%20UW%20Pray%202011.doc[9/2/2011 3:58:21 PM]

¯g‹˜Z°¶´®o~ÙºlAp°lxŠpT0÷+[}`j×ëõº½zAϰV–2ÍFÞÉi–@öqžv·Ö¬5\|‰þÊœÌN§Óle²X¢dsøµÚjcsÙÁÅ7çðÎf·»êàÈâWçðý+Õ†‹7 ˆÑä`ÚïgÔȘ³íJøÀ×j|†‚h(¢K³óD-Šµßã¢dXÑ©iJÆ؇(îâx$(Öð:Á¥;ä˹!ÍI_ÐTµ½S1£÷êù÷¯ž?EÇž?øéøáÃã?ZBΪmœ„åU/¿ýìÏÇ£?ž~óòÑÕxYÆÿúÃ'¿üüy5Òg&΋/ŸüöìÉ‹¯>ýý»GðMGeøÆD¢›äíó3Vq%'#q¾ÃÓòŠÍ$”8ÁšKýžŠôÍ)f™w9:ĵàå£x}rÏx‰‰¢œw¢ØîrÎ:\TZaGó*™y8IÂjæbRÆíc|XÅ»‹Ç¿½Iu3KGñnD1÷NIBÒsü€íîRêØu—ú‚K>Vè.EL+M2¤#'šf‹¶i~™Véþvl³{u8«Òz‹ºHÈÌ*„æ˜ñ:ž(W‘☕~«¨JÈÁTøe\O*ðtHG½€HYµæ–}KNßÁP±*ݾ˦±‹ŠTѼ9/#·øA7ÂqZ…Ð$*c?¢íqUßån†èwðNºû%Ž»O¯·ièˆ4=3Ú—PªÓäïÊ1£Pm\\9†øâëÇ‘õ¶âMØ“ª2aûDù]„;Yt»\ôí¯¹[x’ìóùç]É}Wr½ÿ|É]”Ïg-´³ÚeW÷¶)6-r¼°CSÆjÊÈišd ûDЇA½ÎœIqbJ#xÌ꺃6kàê#ª¢A„Sh°ëž&ÊŒt(QÊ%ìÌp%m‡&]ÙcaSl=XíòÀ¯èáü\P1»MhŸ9£Mà¬ÌV®dDAí×aV×B™[݈fJÃP|8¯Ö„AÛV^…ó¹fÌH ín÷ÞÜ-Æé"á€d>ÒzÏû¨nœ”ÇŠ¹ €Ø©ð‘>äbµ·–&ûÜÎâ¤2»Æv¹÷ÞÄKyϼ¤óöD:²¤œœ,AGm¯Õ\nzÈÇiÛÙã¼.uχYC¾6ìOMf“å3o¶rÅÜ$¨Ã5…µûœÂNH…T[XF64ÌT,Ñœ¬üËM0ëE)`#ý5¤XYƒ`øפ;º®%ã1ñUÙÙ¥m;ûš•R>QD¢àØDìcp¿UÐ' ®&LEÐ/p¦m¦Üâœ%]ùöÊàì8fi„³r«S4Ïd7y\È`ÞJân•²åίŠIùR¥Æÿ3Uô~7+ö€×¸#¯mq¨BiDý¾€ÆÁÔˆ¸‹…i*¸L6ÿ9ÔÿmÎY&áÀ§öiˆ…ýHE‚=(K&úN!VÏö.K’e„LD•Ä•©{D 긪÷vEꦚdeÀàNÆŸûžeÐ(ÔMN9ßœRì½6þéÎÇ&3(åÖaÓÐäö/D¬ØUíz³<ß{ËŠè‰Y›Õȳ˜•¶‚V–ö¯)Â9·Z[±æ4^næÂç5†Á¢!Já¾é?°ÿQá3ûeBo¨C¾µÁ‡M¢ú’m<.vp“´Á¤IYÓf“¶Z¾Y_p§[ð=al-ÙYü}NcÍ™ËÎÉÅ‹4vfaÇÖvl¡©Á³'S†ÆùAÆ8Æ|Ò*uâ£{àè-¸ßŸ0%M0Á7%¡õ˜<€ä·ÍÒ¿ÿÿPK!ÑŸ¶'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.rels„MÂ0„÷‚wooÓº‘&݈ÐÔ„ä56?$Qìí®,.‡a¾™i»—Éc2Þ1hª:é•qšÁm¸ìŽ@RN‰Ù;d°`‚Žo7íg‘K(M&$R(.1˜r'J“œÐŠTù€®8£Vä"£¦AÈ»ÐH÷u} ñ›|Å$½b{Õ–Pšÿ³ý8‰g/]þQAsÙ…(¢ÆÌà#›ªLÊ[ººÄßÿÿPK-!‚Š¼ú[Content_Types].xmlPK-!¥Ö§çÀ6+_rels/.relsPK-!ky–ƒŠtheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!–µâ–PÑtheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-!ÑŸ¶'› theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]–<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><a:clrMap xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" bg1="lt1" tx1="dk1" bg2="lt2" tx2="dk2" accent1="accent1" accent2="accent2" accent3="accent3" accent4="accent4" accent5="accent5" accent6="accent6" hlink="hlink" folHlink="folHlink"/>Bÿÿÿÿ²B gBð8ð@ñÿÿÿ€€€÷ð’ðð0ð( ðððBðSð¿Ëÿ ?ðÿÿ QuickMark^D^Dÿÿ^΢¤X_΢f&`΢|º$a΢¤f&b΢g&++==DD55CJJD9*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€place€;*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€address€:*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€Street€=*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €PlaceName€=*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €PlaceType€¨ƒ"âæDD3—¢£¨©ÌÍ×ÝåæADøø+4;<—£§©²³ÞéêêôôýiiÌÐ×àäæéé09AADå°qð4íJ9û*;§HSåTs7^ˆ~ªëuƇF×ÃcâJ)ìBDÿ@B`@ÿÿUnknownÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿG‡* ÿTimes New Roman5€Symbol3.‡* ÿArial_Advisor SSiTimes New Roman71 CourierAï ë BŸCambria Math"Áˆ òÐh÷³ø&÷³ø&¯RØ&¢ ¢ ! òÑ¥Àxxƒ2d@@3ƒ òÑßßÿýHX ðÿ?äÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿû*;2!xx ÿÿP R O C L A M A T I O N Kathy KeaneKendrick, Bryanþÿà…ŸòùOh«‘+'³Ù0 ˜ ÄÐäðü $0P\ht€ˆ˜äP R O C L A M A T I O N Kathy KeaneNormalKendrick, Bryan2Microsoft Office Word@FÃ#@òMÌÑÊ@ªÀÁaÌ@ªÀÁaÌ¢ þÿÕÍÕœ.“—+,ù®0hpŒ”œ¤¬´¼ÄÌñäCity of San Angelo@P R O C L A M A T I O N Title þÿÿÿþÿÿÿ !"#þÿÿÿ%&'()*+þÿÿÿýÿÿÿ.þÿÿÿþÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿRoot Entryÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÀFÀl*ÆaÌ0€1Tableÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ

file:///Y|/COUNCIL/Electronic%20Agendas/2011/09-06-11/Proc%20-%20UW%20Pray%202011.doc[9/2/2011 3:58:21 PM]

óWordDocumentÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿASummaryInformation(ÿÿÿÿDocumentSummaryInformation8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ$CompObjÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿyÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿ ÀF'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 DocumentMSWordDocWord.Document.8ô9²q