chief fire officers association wexford 2004
DESCRIPTION
Chief Fire Officers Association Wexford 2004. Con Murphy C.Eng. MIEI Chief Fire Officer South Tipperary. Conference AIM : To examine the current state of Fire Safety and Civil Protection and look to the future . Civil Protection in Europe – Ernst Shulte - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Chief Fire Officers AssociationWexford 2004
Con Murphy C.Eng. MIEIChief Fire OfficerSouth Tipperary
2
Conference AIM:To examine the current state of Fire Safety and Civil Protection and look to the future.
1. Civil Protection in Europe – Ernst Shulte
2. Business Continuity - not just for business Michael Gallagher
3. Crisis Communications Shelia Cauldfield
4. Emergency Management – a State of preparedness?
3
Introduction
• Definition of terms• Hazard Analysis /Risk Assessment/Risk
Management• Objectives of Emergency Planning• Short International Tour• Issues in Ireland• Conclusions
4
Definitions• Emergency
– Incident requiring attendance of emergency services• Major Emergency
– beyond the normal capacity of the Emerg. Services• plane crash
• Disaster– E. S. overcome – mainly deal with the aftermath
• tornado
• Catastrophe– E.S. response compromised
• 9/11
5
Definitions
HAZARDPotential for harm to Man or Environment
• Measured in terms of:speed frequency duration predictability
magnitude (energy) extentseverity manageability
6
Definitions
VULNERABILITY Ability to resist and recover
• Measured in terms of susceptibility of individuals, groups or communities– age; isolation; ethnicity; illness;
mobility; co-workers; homelessness;history/geography; coincidence.
7
DefinitionsCAPACITY –
Ability to respond, mitigate and alleviateMeasured in terms of:• Resources
– staff, equipment, finance, technology• Knowledge
– history, likely impact• Skills
– management, experience, training, planning• Values
– commitment, political, culture
8
Definitions
RISK = Hazard x Vulnerability Capacity
• Emergency services largely restricted to improving CAPACITY to deal with RISK
9
Risk Analysis United States
• Federal Emergency Management Agency– HISTORY
• past occurrences– VULNERABILITY
• population density,location, property, environment – MAXIMUM THREAT
• worst case scenario– PROBABILITY
• likelihood of occurrence
10
Risk Analysis Tasmanian Emergency Man. Agency• S M U G
SERIOUSNESS– people, environmental, financialMANAGABILITY– capacity to cope, to mitigationURGENCY– immediate impactGROWTH– potential
11
Risk Analysis - Matrixe.g R = H x V
• Vulnerability Score1 = unlikely to lead to injury2 = may lead to minor injury3 = likely to result in injury
req. first aid treatment4 = likely to result in
injury>> attendance at hospital
5 = likely to result in significant personal injury
• Hazard Score1 = most unlikely to
lead to accident2 = unlikely to lead
accident3 = may lead to
accident4 = likely to lead to
accident5 = highly likely to lead
to accident
12
A C D E F
FEATURES HAZARD VULNERABILITY RISK # Vertical Ladder 10.5m Ladder 13.5m Ladder Objects falling from tower Persons falling from tower Wet Floors Poor, untidy housekeeping Gas ‘wall of flame’ Gas ‘wall of flame’ Stairs Crawl-ways Wood fires ‘Flash-over’demonstration Hose rolling Portable pump operating Main pump operating Drill yard traffic Cylinder refilling
Risk Analysis Matrix
13
MatrixA C D E F
FEATURES HAZARD VULNERABILITY RISK #Vertical Ladder 2 4 8 1110.5m Ladder 2 3 6 1413.5m Ladder 2 4 8 11Objects falling from tower 3 4 12 4Persons falling from tower 3 3 9 8Wet Floors 5 4 20 1Poor, untidy housekeeping 4 3 12 4Gas ‘wall of flame’ 4 4 16 2Gas ‘wall of flame’ 3 3 9 8Stairs 4 4 16 2Crawl-ways 2 2 4 18Wood fires 2 3 6 14‘Flash-over’demonstration 3 3 9 8Hose rolling 4 2 8 11Portable pump operating 3 4 12 4Main pump operating 2 3 6 14Drill yard traffic 2 5 10 7Cylinder refilling 1 5 5 17
Total of scores = 172…Av =9.77
14
Subjective >>> Objective Group Risk
FEATURES No 1 No 2 No 3 No 4 No 5 No 6 No 7 Total Rank Vertical Ladder 3 4 11 10 1 1 2 32 16 10.5m Ladder 8 13 14 5 1 8 2 51 7 13.5m Ladder 15 7 11 4 1 8 2 48 9 Objects falling from tower 12 3 4 5 8 8 2 42 15 Persons falling from tower 10 12 8 1 7 14 1 53 6 Wet Floors 4 5 1 13 16 1 3 43 14 Poor, untidy housekeeping 1 7 4 16 16 1 3 48 9 Gas ‘wall of flame’ 8 1 2 16 10 17 3 57 4 Gas ‘wall of flame’ 4 1 8 5 10 13 3 44 12 Stairs 4 7 2 5 4 7 2 31 17 Crawl-ways 2 13 18 16 17 15 3 47 11 Wood fires 9 7 14 10 10 1 3 54 5 ‘Flash-over’demonstration 12 5 8 5 8 8 3 49 8 Hose rolling 4 13 1 13 10 1 2 44 12 Portable pump operating 2 13 4 1 4 1 3 28 18 Main pump operating 3 17 14 3 10 17 3 67 2 Drill yard traffic 6 7 7 12 17 8 2 59 3 Cylinder refilling 3 17 17 13 10 15 3 78 1
15
Societal Risk Analysis
e.g.CBRN - terroristNATURAL - extreme weatherTECHNOLOGICAL - power failureMAN-MADE - transportINDUSTRIAL - hazardous materials
16
Societal Choices
• ACCEPT & RETAIN– fire-deaths in the home
• CONTROL & MANAGE – road safety
• TRANSFER– waste disposal, Y2K
• ABORT – nuclear power
17
Emergency Planning - a Dynamic Process
Assess Vulnerability
Plan for Emergencies
Train & Educate
Prevent & Mitigate
Consult widely,involve stakeholders,seek best practice,Local/Regional/National
Monitor & Evaluate
Develop POLICY
Build capacity,reduce unknowns,
eliminate duplicationTeach & Test,
develop skills/expertiseAdvise Public
18
Definitions
RISK = Hazard x Vulnerability Capacity
• Emergency services largely restricted to improving CAPACITY to deal with RISK
19
Objective = Improve CAPACITY
• Gather & store information and data• Develop public warning systems• Arrange media management• Plan for evacuation and welfare• Plan for community resilience• Plan for community recovery
(physical/sociological/ psychological)
20
Objective = Improve CAPACITY
• Business / organisational recovery• Identify needs & shortcomings• Assess resources, evaluate adequacy• Optimise resources, eliminate duplication• Be cost effective• Maximise / acquire technology• Develop personal skills and expertise
21
Objective = Improve CAPACITY
• Optimise use of skills and expertise• Develop training, commitment• Build partnerships • Develop Management capability• Appreciate historical lessons• Gain political support
22
Ultimate Objective
A viable system that can maintain its integrity
in a variable environment
23
Arrangements in other countries
• England & Wales• Norway• Portugal• Belgium• Sweden• FEU (Federation of European Fire Officers’ Associations)
24
MatrixA C D E F
FEATURES HAZARD VULNERABILITY RISK #Vertical Ladder 2 4 8 1110.5m Ladder 2 3 6 1413.5m Ladder 2 4 8 11Objects falling from tower 3 4 12 4Persons falling from tower 3 3 9 8Wet Floors 5 4 20 1Poor, untidy housekeeping 4 3 12 4Gas ‘wall of flame’ 4 4 16 2Gas ‘wall of flame’ 3 3 9 8Stairs 4 4 16 2Crawl-ways 2 2 4 18Wood fires 2 3 6 14‘Flash-over’demonstration 3 3 9 8Hose rolling 4 2 8 11Portable pump operating 3 4 12 4Main pump operating 2 3 6 14Drill yard traffic 2 5 10 7Cylinder refilling 1 5 5 17
Total of scores = 172…Av =9.77
25
Subjective >>> Objective Group Risk
FEATURES No 1 No 2 No 3 No 4 No 5 No 6 No 7 Total Rank Vertical Ladder 3 4 11 10 1 1 2 32 16 10.5m Ladder 8 13 14 5 1 8 2 51 7 13.5m Ladder 15 7 11 4 1 8 2 48 9 Objects falling from tower 12 3 4 5 8 8 2 42 15 Persons falling from tower 10 12 8 1 7 14 1 53 6 Wet Floors 4 5 1 13 16 1 3 43 14 Poor, untidy housekeeping 1 7 4 16 16 1 3 48 9 Gas ‘wall of flame’ 8 1 2 16 10 17 3 57 4 Gas ‘wall of flame’ 4 1 8 5 10 13 3 44 12 Stairs 4 7 2 5 4 7 2 31 17 Crawl-ways 2 13 18 16 17 15 3 47 11 Wood fires 9 7 14 10 10 1 3 54 5 ‘Flash-over’demonstration 12 5 8 5 8 8 3 49 8 Hose rolling 4 13 1 13 10 1 2 44 12 Portable pump operating 2 13 4 1 4 1 3 28 18 Main pump operating 3 17 14 3 10 17 3 67 2 Drill yard traffic 6 7 7 12 17 8 2 59 3 Cylinder refilling 3 17 17 13 10 15 3 78 1
26
Societal Risk Analysis
e.g.CBRN - terroristNATURAL - extreme weatherTECHNOLOGICAL - power failureMAN-MADE - transportINDUSTRIAL - hazardous materials
27
Societal Choices
• ACCEPT & RETAIN– fire-deaths in the home
• CONTROL & MANAGE – road safety
• TRANSFER– waste disposal, Y2K
• ABORT – nuclear power
28
Emergency Planning - a Dynamic Process
Assess Vulnerability
Plan for Emergencies
Train & Educate
Prevent & Mitigate
Consult widely,involve stakeholders,seek best practice,Local/Regional/National
Monitor & Evaluate
Develop POLICY
Build capacity,reduce unknowns,
eliminate duplicationTeach & Test,
develop skills/expertiseAdvise Public
29
Definitions
RISK = Hazard x Vulnerability Capacity
• Emergency services largely restricted to improving CAPACITY to deal with RISK
30
Objective = Improve CAPACITY
• Gather & store information and data• Develop public warning systems• Arrange media management• Plan for evacuation and welfare• Plan for community resilience• Plan for community recovery
(physical/sociological/ psychological)
31
Objective = Improve CAPACITY
• Business / organisational recovery• Identify needs & shortcomings• Assess resources, evaluate adequacy• Optimise resources, eliminate duplication• Be cost effective• Maximise / acquire technology• Develop personal skills and expertise
32
Objective = Improve CAPACITY
• Optimise use of skills and expertise• Develop training, commitment• Build partnerships • Develop Management capability• Appreciate historical lessons• Gain political support
33
Ultimate Objective
A viable system that can maintain its integrity
in a variable environment
34
Arrangements in other countries
• England & Wales• Norway• Portugal• Belgium• Sweden• FEU (Federation of European Fire Officers’ Associations)
35
Cabinet Office Briefing Room A (COBRA)
Civil ContingenciesSecretariat Lead Depts Home Office D of Health
National
Regional
Local
Regional Resilience Teams
Gov. Office of the Regions
Regional EPUs
Utilities
H.S.E.
Env. Agency StrategicHealth A.s
PrimaryCare
Acute H.TrustsFire Police Amb.
Local Resilience Fora
Local Councils
36
Disaster relief in NorwayMinistry of Justice/PoliceOther Ministries
Dir. for CD and EPOther Dir.s Rescue Co-ord. Ctrs(2)Police, air force, air control, Navy,
Communications, Health As, NGOs
Central
Reg.
Local
County Governor CD Training
Municipalities
On Scene Command
Rescue Sub-centrepolice, fire, Army, Health, NGOs, etc.
Mobile aid columns
policy planning Comms, cooperation request assistance
37
Disaster Relief in Portugal
Prime Minister
Ministry of Interior
Nat. EmergencyOps centre
Min. of Defence Other Ministries
National Civil Protection Service
Governor &Reg. Ops Ctrs
Mayor &Local Ops Ctr
Armed Forces
Security
MedicalFire
NGOs
Other Pub. Services
Emergency Plans
RequestAssistance
Planning
Op. Co-ord.
GrantAssistance
38
Belgium – information flow
39
Disaster Management - Sweden
Swedish Emergency Management Agency3 Basic Principles:1. Those that normally carry a responsibility will keep it during emergencies, crises and in war times. 2. Preparedness must be based on the power and responsibilities of Local Government and Authorities.3. Coordination of all resources ; public services & organisations; important private enterprises & utilities.
’CeSam-C’ = Regional Strategic Coordination Centre
Each Municipal Authority has a Crises Management Board
40
FEU … European thinkingCommand & Control
1.Political Component
2.Strategic Component
5.Units
3.Command & Control
4.Co-ordination of units
Off-site
5.Units5.UnitsOn-site
41
Political Component
1
Strategic Component
2
Operational Component
3
Co-Ordination Component
4
Command of Single Unit
5Fire Fighting County Council Chief Fire Officer Senior Fire Officer Station Officer Sub Officer
Forest Fire Fighting
County Council Chief Fire Officer Senior Fire Officer Station Officer Sub Officer
Technical Rescue County Council Chief Fire Officer Senior Fire Officer Station Officer Sub Officer
Hazardous Materials County Council Chief Fire Officer Senior Fire Officer Station Officer Sub Officer
Medical Rescue Health Board Gen. Manager Community Care
Chief Ambulance Officer
County Ambulance Officer
Not applicable
Inland Water Rescue
Director C.G. On-Scene-Commander Declared Resource Senior Officer of Declared Resource
Junior Officer of Declared resource
Mountain and Cave
Police Commissioner Chief Superintendent Superintendent Inspector Sergeant
Air Traffic Rescue
Director Av. Authority ? ? N/A N/A
Open Sea Rescue
Director C.G. On-Scene-Commander Declared Resource Senior Officer of Declared Resource
Junior Officer of Declared resource
Environmental Director On-Scene-Commander Declared Resource Senior Officer of Declared Resource
Junior Officer of Declared resource
Search for Missing
Police Commissioner Chief Superintendent Superintendent Inspector Sergeant
Radioactive County Council Chief Fire Officer Senior Fire Officer Station Officer Sub Officer
42
Stakeholders - Govt. Level
• Dept. of Taoiseach• Dept. of Enterprise • Dept. Defence• Dept. Environment• Dept. Marine• Finance
• Dept. Health
• Dept. Justice
• Dept. Marine• Agriculture• Transport
43
Stakeholders - Public Services
• Local Authority– Fire Service
• Gardai• Health Authority
– Ambulance Service– Hospitals
• Coast Guard
• Air Transport– Irish Aviation
Authority• Road Transport
– Bus Companies• Rail Transport• EPA, HSA, NRA
44
Stakeholders - Voluntary Sector
• Civil Defence• Mountain Rescue• Cave Rescue• Life Boat• Red Cross• St. Johns Ambulance
• Water Rescue• Sub-aqua• Search & Rescue Dogs• Order of Malta• Other
45
Stakeholders - Private Sector
• Seveso sites
• Pharma - Chem
• HazMat Industry
• Other Industry
• Transport
• Bus/Haulage
• IBEC, ISME
• Unions
• Insurance
• Financial Institutions
46
IDC IDWG OEP Gov. Task Force
L. A.s
Garda
Ambulance
Regional groupsRegional groups
Others
Central
Regional
Local
Private Sector
47
ISSUES
• Ultimate Responsibility• Local/Regional Responsibility & Powers• Development & USE of expertise• Facility to upscale (geographically)• Wide Area Emergency • Declaration of ‘A State of Emergency’• Resilience FA/FA, Other resources
48
ISSUES
• Grading of Emergencies – Alert > blue > orange > red
• Use of technology– e.g. satellite phone
• Communications (CAMP)• Information Systems
– Use of websites• Media management
49
ISSUES• Public Sector Business Continuity• Integrate Public and Private Sector• ‘Emergency Planning Society’
– Integrated Emergency PlanningSingle overall authority;Multi-dimensional;Awareness/Communication; Central Website;Public/Private/Partnership
• Identify STATIC and DYNAMIC elements
50
Conclusions
• There are no simple solutions– but there are solutions
• Many possible appropriate models• What we have is not adequate
• “ We do not believe that the current regime would stand up favourably under the inevitable scrutiny and investigation which would follow a major fire or other major emergency …” FGS
51
Conclusions
“…inevitable scrutiny and investigation”Who locally?
– Controller of Operations– Coordinating Group– ‘Management’
• Who else ?– Government
52
Conclusions
A State of preparedness ?
53
Recommendations
• Combine risksstakeholders issuesbest modern practicepolicy Safety Chain ……Farrell Grant Sparks