charmless quasi-two-body modes at babar
DESCRIPTION
Charmless Quasi-two-Body Modes at BaBar. Fernando Palombo Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Milan for The BaBar Collaboration ICHEP’04 August 16 – 22 , 2004 Beijing, China. Outline. Motivation Analysis Technique : Overview B 0 → B + → + , B + → + B 0 → - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
1
Charmless Quasi-two-Body Charmless Quasi-two-Body Modes at BaBarModes at BaBar
Fernando PalomboDipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Milan
for The BaBar CollaborationICHEP’04 August 16 – 22 , 2004 Beijing, China
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
2
OutlineOutline
• Motivation• Analysis Technique : Overview• B0 →
• B+ → +, B+ → +
• B0 → • B0 → a1(1260) -
• B0 →ρ0 KS
• B0 → KS KS KS
• Conclusion
+
0 00
0
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
3
MotivationMotivation We look to processes dominated by
penguin loops or CKM-suppressed decay (Rare Decays)
An optimal place for measurements sensitive to new physics ( new contributions to the penguin amplitude beyond the SM)
Check of QCD Factorization, Perturbative QCD, Flavour SU(3)
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
4
Analysis Technique : Analysis Technique : OverviewOverview
Unbinned Maximum Likelihood (ML) Fit Kinematic and event shape variables Apply loose cuts to keep side-bands for background fitting Main background : e+e- → q q continuum (q = u,d,s,c) fit accounts also for B B background Extract from ML fits: yields, charge asymmetries, efficiencies, PDF parameters Several Crosschecks “Toy MC” experiments, control samples Analyses presented in this talk done in Q2B approximation
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
5
BB00 →→
Expected dominated by b → s loop amplitudes
K+ K, *+, sK* enhanced + K K*+ * suppressed
(Lipkin,199)
ICHEP/11-0936 BaBar-Conf-04/023
Interference
A. Ali et al., PRD59, 014005 (1999), M. Z. Yang et al., NPB609,469 (2001)
M. Beneke et al., NP B651,225(2003), H.K. Fu et al., PRD69,074002 (2004)
Chiang et al., PRD69,934001 (2004)
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
6
New Measurement of BNew Measurement of B00 →→
New measurement with 182 106 BB pairs .
Predicted large charge asymmetryChiang et al., PRD69,034001(2004)
Now observed by BaBarPRL 92, 061801 (2004)
ηK0
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
7
BB++→ → + + and and BB++→ → ++
Expected dominated by a CKM-suppressed tree diagram
Vub
ICHEP /11-0936 BaBar-Conf-04/023
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
8
New Measurements of BNew Measurements of B++→ → + + and and BB++→ →
++
+ +
_
182 106 BB pairs used in this analysis_
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
9
New Measurement of BNew Measurement of B00 →→
Remeasurement done with 182 106 BB pairs
As expected we improve upper limits.Very interesting for calculation of upper bound on ΔS in B0 decay modes dominated by penguins
Subm.to PRL
Measurements done with 89 106 BB pairs_
_
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
10
Isoscalars ULs and Isoscalars ULs and ΔS
Gronau, Rosner,Zupan hep-ph/0403287
With new ULs in B decays to isoscalar pairs measured by BaBargreat improvement in the bounds of ΔS = S – sin 2 β S is the coefficient of sin term in time evolution of the systemsin 2 β is S measured in B0 decays to charmonium K0
BaBar new measurement in η'K0 : S=0.27 ±0.14 ±0.03 ( see Hoecker C=-0.21± 0.10 ±0.03 talk, this conf )
see also :Grossman et al. PRD68 ,015004 (2003)
Previous bound
New bounds
2003 BaBar + Belle average η'K0
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
11
BB00→ → aa11++- - (a(a11→→++++--))
Rare decay with a BF not yet measured.
These decays can be used to study CP asymmetryfor an independent measurement of sin 2α
But first we have to measure the BF to see if there is any signal.
Analysis done with a statistics of 124 106 BB pairs.
Simple analysis done in Quasi-2-Body approximation.Dalitz plot analysis is in progress
ICHEP/11-0969 BaBar-Conf-04/002
_
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
12
Measurement BMeasurement B00→ → aa11- - ( a( a11→→++++- - ))
Yield 472 ±46
Br(B0→a1+ -) = (42.6 ± 4.2stat ± 4.1syst ) 10-6
3
Observation of this decay stat. sign. > 10 σ
m = 1.19 ± 0.02 GeV/c2 Γ = 312 ± 55 MeV/c2
a1a1
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
13
BB00→→ρρ00KK00SS
Penguin dominated mode :
Another candidate for measuring CP-violating asymmetries (sin 2 β ) in penguin-dominated modes
Analysis done using 227 106 BB pairs
Several classes of Charmless and Charm backgrounds described by PDFs in ML fit
ICHEP/11/0992 BaBar-Conf-04/046
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
14
BB00→→ρρ00KK00SS
Yield : 99 ± 19
Br(B0→ρ0KS ) = (5.1 ± 1.0 ± 1.2) 10-6
Evidence of this mode at 3.5 σ
(ρ0KS + σ KS ) signal at 6.1 σ
0
0 0
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
15
B B →→KKSS KKSS KKSS00
Penguin dominated mode :
This decay is not Cabibbo-suppressed
Already measured by Belle with 78 fb-1Br(BB00→→KKSS K KS S KKS S )) = (4.2 ± 0.8) 10-6
This measurement done with 211 106 BB pairs
000 +1.6 -1.3
0000 00
_
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
16
BB00→→KK00SS KK00
SS KK00SS
Yield 71 ± 9 ε = 5.2 % syst. err = 13 %
Br(B0→ KS KS KS ) = (6.5 ± 0.8 ± 0.8) 10-6
Significance > 10 σ
ICHEP/11-0929 BaBa-Conf-04/032
0 0 0
18/08/04 Fernando Palombo , ICHEP 2004
17
ConclusionConclusion
Observations of B0 → ηK0 , ηρ+, η'+ , a1+ -
Evidence for B0 → ρ0 at 3.5 σ
B0 → 3 seen with stat. sign. > 10 σ No evidence in these decay modes for direct CPV Severe tests of factorizion models
(predictions of BF, charge asymmetry, etc)
all new results are preliminary
0 KS
KS
0