chapter 5, public places urban spaces- perceptual dimensions

10
PERCEPTUAL DIMENSIONS CHAPTER 5 ,PUBLIC PLACES-URBAN SPACES Matthew Carmona, Tim Heath, Taner Oc, Steve Tiesdell Anila Rose Cherian . 7 . s9 B.Arch

Upload: anila-cherian

Post on 02-Feb-2015

589 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: chapter 5, public places urban spaces- Perceptual dimensions

PERCEPTUAL DIMENSIONSCHAPTER 5 ,PUBLIC PLACES-URBAN SPACES

Matthew Carmona, Tim Heath, Taner Oc, Steve Tiesdell

Anila Rose Cherian . 7 . s9 B.Arch

Page 2: chapter 5, public places urban spaces- Perceptual dimensions

Environmental perceptionWe affect the environment and are affected by it.For this interaction to happen we must ‘perceive’ i.e. be stimulated by sight, sound, smell or touch.It involves gathering, organizing and making sense of the environment.

Sensation and perception Vision Hearing Smell TouchThese sensory stimuli are perceived and apprecitiated as an interconnected whole. It provides a cumulative effect.

Dimensions of perception Cognition: thinking about, organizing, making sense of the

environment Affective : our feelings, which influence perception of environment

and perception that influences feelings Interpretative : meaning / association derived from environment.

We rely on memory for points of comparison with newly experienced stimuli

Evaluative : incorporates values and preferences and the determination of ‘good or ‘bad’

Page 3: chapter 5, public places urban spaces- Perceptual dimensions

touchsound

smell

taste

sight

Page 4: chapter 5, public places urban spaces- Perceptual dimensions

Perception is not only biological, but a social and cultural learnt process as well. It depends of factors like gender, age, ethnicity, lifestyle, length of residence in an area, and on physical, social and cultural environment in which a person lives and was raised.

Workable environmental images requires three attributes: Identity. Structure. Meaning

Kevin Lynch’s image of the city is based on the concept of mental mapping; Imageability

Lynch separated meaning from form and explored imageability in terms of physical qualities relating to identity and structure. He derived 5 key physical elements through mental mapping / cognitive exercises in observers. Paths Edges Districts Nodes Landmarks

Page 5: chapter 5, public places urban spaces- Perceptual dimensions

landmark node path

edge

district

Page 6: chapter 5, public places urban spaces- Perceptual dimensions

BEYOND THE IMAGE OF A CITYAreas of criticism in Lynch’s findings and methods. Observer variation Legibility and imageability Meaning and symbolismConclusion drawn was that social and emotional meanings attached to, or evoked by the elements of the urban environment were at least as important than the structural and physical aspects of peoples imagery.

ENVIRONMENTAL MEANING AND SYMBOLISMSign – signification, signifier, signified Iconic signs – direct similarity with object Indexical signs – material relationship with object Symbolic signs – arbitrary relationship with objectSemiotics involves the layering of meaningsFirst order sign / primary function – denotationSecond order sign / secondary function – connotation

Buildings in an environment are a symbol in itself. Modernists sought to escape from symbolizing buildings. They designed to express internal functions. Post modern style arose to have multiple meanings.

Page 7: chapter 5, public places urban spaces- Perceptual dimensions

THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLACE

‘Sense of place’- can be understood in terms of ‘genius loci’ , Latin concept that people experience something beyond the physical or sensory properties of places and can feel an attachment to a spirit of a place.(Jackson, 1994 p.157)Eg.Paris, Disney Land, Las Vegas, New York

Phenomenology: while meanings are rooted in their physical settings and activities, they are not a property of them, but of human interactions and experiences. Thus what ‘the environment’ represents is a function of our own subjective construction of it.‘place’ – ‘belonging’

Territoriality and personalization ‘inside’-’outside’ of a ‘place’ Individual identity is associated with personalization and putting a

distinctive stamp on ones environment. It is a ‘unique address’ Place = space in image of man Occasion = time in image of man Successful places have animation and vitality. They offer what people

want in an attractive and safe environment. Key attributes : comfort and image, access and linkage, uses and

activity, and sociability (Project for Public Space (1999))

Page 8: chapter 5, public places urban spaces- Perceptual dimensions

Placelessness“There is no there, there” ,Gertrude SteinNegative concept-tends to signify absence or loss of meaningCasual eradication of distinctive places and making of standardized landscapes.Factors contributing to placelessness Globalization : world is interconnected , central decision making,

two scenarios - convergence where sameness emerges and divergence where disparate elements maintain cultural and spatial distinctiveness

Mass culture : homogenisation, destroying local cultures Loss of (attachment) to territory : no care for environment when there is

no sense of belonging. ‘Existential outsideness’

‘Invented’ placesManufacturing of differences- invention or reinvention of places.Places ‘imagineered’ to create uniqueness to attract attention and visitors and in turn make money.Invented places are the fiction of architects, authors, artists, designers, imagineers eg. Disney Land, shopping malls

This concept raises issues like Superficiality, other-directedness, lacking authenticity

Page 9: chapter 5, public places urban spaces- Perceptual dimensions

Superficiality : depthlessness, undermining the real/unique identity of a place. Architectural ‘fetishism’

Other-directedness – created from without rather than within : outside inventions, rather than autonomous expressions of local culture,meanings and associations. ‘Economic space’ invades ‘lived space’.

Lacking authenticity : critics regard explicit copies/ references from past in urban context as ‘false’ and ‘lacking authenticity’

Public cannot distinguish what is real and what is not (Huxtable, The unreal America)

Criticism of invented places provokes the question: why shouldn’t urban design produce places that people like and enjoy?

Although urban design as a process invents or reinvents places with authenticity or lack of it, it is the people who make places and give them meaningIt is the peoples perceptions that are important.

Page 10: chapter 5, public places urban spaces- Perceptual dimensions

THANK YOU