central regional logistics council … the crossroads: driving central indiana’s logistics ......

CENTRAL REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL

OCTOBER 2015

STRENGTHENING THE CROSSROADS: DRIVING CENTRAL INDIANA’S LOGISTICS INDUSTRY

Conexus Indiana is the state’s advanced manufacturing

and logistics initiative, dedicated to making Indiana

a global leader in these high-growth, high-tech industries.

The mission of CILC is to work with a sense of urgency to

strengthen the logistics sector in Indiana by identifying and

acting on concrete opportunities for enhancement, which

better positions the State to grow existing business, attract

new business, and thereby create new jobs.

I

CONEXUS INDIANA CENTRAL REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL

CHAIR

*Mark DeFabisPresident & CEOIntegrated Distribution Services, Inc.Plainfield

*Kevin AdamsVP, OperationsOHL Contract LogisticsPlainfield(Workforce Development Chair)

Stephen AlexanderCEO/Chief ArchitectRees AlexanderIndianapolis

*Timothy AlmackPartnerKatz, Sapper & Miller, LLPIndianapolis

Bob BabcockSVP, Operations and Business DevelopmentIndiana Rail Road CompanyIndianapolis

Alex BluesteinChief Global Rep., Business DevelopmentOscar WinskiLafayette

John BrandPresidentButler Fairman & Seufert Civil EngineersIndianapolis

*Mike BroughtonAdvisor, Global LogisticsEli Lilly and CompanyIndianapolis

Mark BrownGeneral ManagerCentral Indiana & Western RailroadLapel

Keith BucklewPrincipal & Freight Discipline LeaderCDM SmithIndianapolis

Jeff CastellSenior Managing Director, PrincipalDTZIndianapolis

*Greg ChaneyExecutive Director, Global Supply ChainAllison TransmissionIndianapolis

Dan CorcoranVP, Midwest RegionContainer Port GroupIndianapolis

Beth CriderDivision Mgr., LogisticsFirestone Building Products, Co.Indianapolis

Andrew ElsenerPresidentSpot FreightIndianapolis

*Dennis FaulkenbergPresident & CEOAppianIndianapolis

Phillip GerrianSenior VPFraley & Schilling, Inc.Rushville

Nate GhaimPresident & CEOHanzo Logistics, Inc.Plainfield

Brian GildeaExecutive DirectorDevelop IndyIndianapolis

Rodney GrahamCFOCNG Source, Inc.Indianapolis

Bob GrzegorekPlant Manager - IndianapolisCoregisticsWhitestown

Brad HastingsSenior VPTippmann Group/ Interstate WarehousingFranklin

Greg HennekeExecutive VPAmerican Structurepoint, Inc.Indianapolis

*Nick HoaglandCOOBackhaul DirectIndianapolis

II

John HongLeader- North American Logistics & International Trade Operations Dow AgroSciencesIndianapolis

Andrea HopperSenior Dir., Industrial Advisory ServicesSummit Realty GroupIndianapolis

*Mark HosfeldVP, Leasing & DevelopmentDuke Realty Corp.Indianapolis

Michael HuberPresident & CEOIndy ChamberIndianapolis

Jim HumphreyVP/COO, Commercial ServicesGoodwill Industries of Central Indiana, Inc.Indianapolis

Paul HuncklerRegional Account ManagerDematic CorporationWestfield

Maeghan HurleyPresidentMKM Distribution ServicesIndianapolis

Layth HussainDir., Operations AmericasBelkinPlainfield

Jennifer Coulter-LissmanGeneral ManagerTOC Logistics International, LLCIndianapolis

*Cathy LanghamPresidentLangham LogisticsIndianapolis

Patrick LindleyExecutive Managing PartnerDTZIndianapolis

Jim LongestPresidentBeam, Longest and NeffIndianapolis

Jennifer MarcumCEOSentry LogisticsIndianapolis

*Sean MaroneyVP, Market Unit Field OperationsCoca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.Indianapolis

David MartinVP, Global SourcingOerlikon FairfieldLafayette

John McCaneExecutive DirectorRush County ECDCRushville

Betsy McCawCOOCICPIndianapolis

David McDougallVice PresidentHNTB CorporationIndianapolis

John McDowellPresidentMulti Modal Transportation LogisticsWhitestown

Steve McGillDirector of Business DevelopmentTonn and Blank ConstructionIndianapolis

Tim MillerProject ManagerLochmueller GroupIndianapolis

Andi MontgomeryOwner & Vice PresidentMontgomery AviationZionsville

Craig MooreDirector, Corporate DevelopmentCitizens Energy GroupIndianapolis

Dean MunnTechnical VP, Systems Planning DivisionCorradino, LLCIndianapolis

*Kevin MurrayVP, Supply ChainRed GoldElwood

Mark NicastroDirector- Indianapolis Distribution CenterCVS PharmacyIndianapolis

Brad OrtmanOperations ManagerKokomo Grain Co, Inc.Kokomo

Chet ParsonsPrincipalPCS EngineersAvon

John PaughCEOCarter LogisticsAnderson(Infrastructure, Co-Chair)

Dan PetersonVP, Industry & Government AffairsCook Group, Inc.Bloomington

III

*Dawn ReplogleVP, Area Interface Mgr. – Transportation, DCS AmericasURS CorporationIndianapolis

Ed RounsavilleGeneral ManagerGENCO/BDPlainfield

*John RoweManaging DirectorCargo Services, Inc.Indianapolis

Bruno SanziVP, Business Dev., Contract ServicesNorbert Dentressangle GroupPlainfield

Thomas J. ScimecaManager, Global Logistics & Customs AdministrationAllison TransmissionIndianapolis

*Mark SellPresident & CEOMD LogisticsPlainfield

*Mark ShublackAttorney at LawIce MillerIndianapolis

Tim SiddiqPresident & CEOMerchandise Warehouse Co., Inc.Indianapolis

(Public Policy, Co-Chair)

Steve SmithMJ Insurance, Inc.Indianapolis

(Infrastructure, Co-Chair)

Roger StephensClient Service ManagerRQAWIndianapolis

Jake SturmanSenior VPJLL America, Inc.Indianapolis

Shelby SwangoArea Manager/VPParsons BrinckerhoffIndianapolis

Michael TaylorPresidentIntegrated Services, Inc.Kokomo

*Phil TerryCEOMonarch Beverage Company, Inc.Indianapolis

Jim TiltonDirector, MaterialsDraper, Inc.Spiceland

*Jim WadeVice PresidentCHA Companies

Indianapolis

Amy WaggonerClient Services ManagerLochmueller GroupIndianapolis

Spence WendelinPresidentWabash Central Railway, Big Four Terminal Railroad and C&NCCorydon

Paul WillVice Chairman, President & CEOCeladon Group, Inc.

Indianapolis

*Doug WilliamsPresidentVenture Logistics, Inc.Indianapolis

Mark WrittSenior VP, Industrial ServicesCB Richard Ellis, Inc.Indianapolis

Bob WuVP, Production Control, Materials Logistics and Information SystemsSubaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc.Lafayette

* Conexus Indiana Logistics Council Member

V

Strengthening the Crossroads: Driving Central Indiana’s Logistics Industry was created by leading members of the logistics users community throughout Central Indiana.

The logistics community, composed of service providers from the four modes of transportation (air, rail, truck and water) as well as other logistics stakeholders including users of logistics services such as advanced manufacturing, warehouse/distribution companies, and infrastructure design and construction companies, gathered and agreed unanimously on the key deliverables and priorities for Central Indiana. The Conexus Indiana Logistics Council, partnering with Central Indiana Corporate Partnership, regional economic development organizations and chambers of commerce in Central Indiana created the Central Regional Logistics Council (CRLC) and was the catalyst in creating the forum of logistics executives to discuss issues affecting their industry and to build a common agenda across all logistics sectors, including both private and public. We believe that by aligning priorities in the areas of infrastructure, public policy and workforce development, Central Indiana will be able to maximize short-term and long-term success for the logistics industry in this region.

Strengthening the Crossroads: Driving Central Indiana’s Logistics Industry was prepared from the input of a broad cross section of logistics providers and users, ensuring that the priorities identified for the Central Region will enhance the environment for growth of existing companies, create a more attractive business climate to attract companies to Indiana, and create high paying jobs for the citizens in this region.

Implementation by both the public and private sectors of the strategies, goals and tactics contained in this plan will continue to grow our region’s reputation as a logistics hub and ensure the region’s leadership in logistics well into the future.

The countless hours and dedication of the volunteer executives from CRLC provide the Conexus Indiana Logistics Council (CILC), the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), the Ports of Indiana, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation, and the regional and local economic groups and chambers of commerce with a strong foundation to make the goals outlined in this plan a reality. The talented and dedicated staff of Conexus Indiana together with the regional and local economic development groups and chambers of commerce will carry out these initiatives and drive the implementation of the tactics necessary to ensure the plan’s success.

We look forward to continuing conversations on future opportunities that will continue to enhance the logistics sector in the Central Region, and we will continue our work by updating the plan on a regular basis to ensure that it is as dynamic as the logistics industry itself.

Respectfully,

Mark DeFabis President & CEO, Integrated Distribution Services, Inc.Chair, Central Regional Logistics Council

LETTER FROM CONEXUSCENTRAL REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL CHAIR

VI

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................1

PROBLEM STATEMENT ..............................................................................................1

MISSION STATEMENT .............................................................................................1

OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................2

LOGISTICS STRATEGIES ....................................................................................3

INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS .........................................................................................3

PUBLIC POLICY GOALS .............................................................................................4

PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS .....................................................................................4

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS ........................................................................4

IMPLEMENTATION TACTICS ............................................................................5

INFRASTRUCTURE .....................................................................................................5Regional Tactics .....................................................................................................5 Local Tactics ........................................................................................................10

PUBLIC POLICY ......................................................................................................68

PUBLIC AWARENESS ..............................................................................................69

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................69

LOGISTICS MARKET ANALYSIS ....................................................................70

TRANSPORTATION MODE SWOT ANALYSIS .............................................................70

PUBLIC POLICY SWOT ANALYSIS .............................................................................74

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SWOT ANALYSIS ........................................................77

PUBLIC AWARENESS SWOT ANALYSIS .....................................................................78

CENTRAL REGION INFRASTRUCTURE DATA ...............................................................79

1

The Conexus Indiana Central Regional Logistics Council (CRLC) is a forum of 76 logistics executives and thought leaders from throughout Central Indiana representing the following logistics sectors: air, infrastructure, rail, trucking, warehousing/distribution, waterborne, advanced manufacturing and services firms. Logistics users are manufacturers, distributors/warehousing, and third-party providers.

CRLC is working to:

◆◆ Enhance the environment for companies in advanced manufacturing and logistics to grow their business, taking advantage of Indiana’s position at the heart of the global supply chain;

◆◆ Create a more attractive environment for manufacturing and logistics companies to relocate to or expand in the Central Region, thereby creating jobs and increasing State and local revenue; and

◆◆ Create high paying jobs for Hoosiers – the average wage of Indiana manufacturing and logistics jobs is more than 33% higher than the State’s median income.

PROBLEM STATEMENTThe Central Region’s transportation network has opportunities for improvement due to transportation “bottlenecks,” lack of direct rail service, underutilized air facilities with little international freight movement, lack of efficient mode-to-mode connectivity (e.g. road to rail, road to water, road to air, rail to water), a decaying lock and dam infrastructure, and lack of dredging that prohibits barges/ships to maximize capacity. This disconnect has created higher costs, potential environmental impacts, inefficient freight movement, loss of productivity for Central Region business, and safety impacts.

MISSION STATEMENTThe mission of the Central Regional Logistics Council is to work to provide logistics excellence in Central Indiana through the development of infrastructure, public policy, public awareness, and workforce development to promote logistics competitiveness for the hub of the “Crossroads of America” by driving economic development and business growth.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: CENTRAL REGIONAL LOGISTICS COUNCIL

2

OBJECTIVES

1. Executive Forum: Provide a forum for Central Region logistics executives to discuss issues affecting the industry;

2. Infrastructure: Develop a comprehensive plan to strengthen the Central Region’s public and private logistics infrastructure;

3. Public Awareness: Develop paid and earned media to promote the sector;

4. Public Policy: Identify State and Federal public policy areas that impact the logistics industry and work with State and Federal thought leaders from government, academia and associations to enhance the sector;

5. Workforce Development: Develop and implement strategies to build the human capital needed to support the growing demand for logistics services through innovative workforce programs in the Central Region.

3

◆◆ Increase the flow of goods originating, terminating, and adding value within the Central Region over the next five years, thereby creating an increase of net new jobs and growing the logistics sector.

◆◆ Provide a broad-based forum, consisting of Central Region business executives throughout the logistics industry, for collectively vetting critical relevant logistics public policy issues of commonality, therefore optimizing the business climate.

◆◆ Strengthen and grow the logistics qualified workforce in the Central Region by creating portable skills curricula leading to academic degrees/certifications that will increase the pipeline of qualified workers over the next five years.

◆◆ Increase the public’s awareness of the importance of the logistics industry on the Central Region’s economy.

INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS

1. Reduce bottlenecks in the Central Region to improve the reliability and efficiency of freight movement leading to less congestion, reduced infrastructure repairs, and lower emissions.

2. Ensure global access by connecting Central Region cities based on impact and potential to Interstate-like access.

3. Create better connectivity of Indiana’s water ports via roads and rail modes and improve the reliability and efficiency of water freight movement to and from the Central Region.

4. Develop a fast and efficient process for unplanned economic development infrastructure needs.

5. Develop and implement transportation networks that provide direct rail, truck access and air cargo expansion leading to the improvement and establishment of multimodal and intermodal service and air cargo facilities.

LOGISTICS STRATEGIES

4

PUBLIC POLICY GOALS

1. Ensure State and Federal Government do not legislate or regulate barriers to the safe, efficient and innovative movements of goods and resources that are necessary to support the growth of the logistics sector.

2. Ensure State and Federal Government provide the necessary funding for the public infrastructure needed to support the efficient and cost effective operation of Indiana’s logistics sector.

3. Ensure CRLC is recognized by governmental entities as a resource of first resort and the voice for the logistics industry.

PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS

1. Develop brand awareness of CRLC.

2. Create general public understanding of logistics by ensuring that the population has a basic understanding of logistics.

3. Increase the perception of the need to improve/expand Indiana’s infrastructure.

4. Highlight Indiana’s logistics companies by bringing awareness to their products and services.

5. Increase the public’s understanding of the positive impact of global trade on Indiana’s economy and jobs.

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

1. Increase the skill levels of the Central Region’s logistics workers through workforce education programs.

2. Increase the upward mobility and job prospects of current and future Central Region logistics workers.

5

REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING CRLC INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS

◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING AVIATION GOALS

◆◆ Air Cargo Volume Study: Conduct a private sector study on air cargo volume for integrated and non-integrated freight and air passenger travel, with the long-term objective of maximizing the use of air capacity

◆◆ Jet Fuel Refinery Feasibility Study – Conduct a private sector study on the need for a jet fuel refinery in Central Indiana

◆ REGIONAL PRIORITY PROJECTS

PROJECT # COUNTY CENTRAL REGIONAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4

0601 Boone, Clinton, Hamilton, Marion US 421 Additional Lanes

0602 Boone, Hamilton, Madison I-65/I-69 Connector

1008 Boone, Clinton, Hendricks, Johnson, Marion, Shelby, Tippecanoe I-65 Additional Lanes

1801 Delaware, Hamilton, Madison, Marion I-69 Additional Lanes

2501 Hamilton, Howard, Tipton US 31 Indianapolis to Benton Harbor, MI

3201 Boone, Hendricks Ronald Reagan Parkway Extension

3202 Hendricks, Marion US 36 Corridor

3205 Hendricks I-70/I-74 Connector

4517 Out of state Soo Locks

4803 Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Madison, Morgan, Shelby Indiana Commerce Connector

4910 Marion Senate Avenue Intermodal

5401 Montgomery, Tippecanoe US 231 Additional Lanes

3802 Randolph, Wayne US 27 Improvements

4101 Johnson, Marion, Morgan I-69 Completion

4909 Boone, Marion I-465 Additional Lanes

6506 Out of state Olmstead Lock Reconstruction

8403 Hancock, Hendricks, Henry, Marion, Morgan, Putnam, Wayne I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck Lanes

2101 Fayette, Wayne Connersville Connector

5408 Boone, Montgomery US 32 Additional Lanes

7001 Decatur, Henry, Rush SR 3 Improvements

IMPLEMENTATION TACTICS

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

¹º»¼

!

¬ «1¬ «34

2

¬ «134

¬ «431

¬ «445

¬ «267

¬ «352

¬ «46

¬ «232

¬ «140

¬ «641

¬ «9

¬ «67

¬ «135

¬ «15

¬ «11

¬ «225

¬ «750

¬ «25¬ «34

1

¬ «144

¬ «22

¬ «148

¬ «341

¬ «15

¬ «103

¬ «340

¬ «29

¬ «44

¬ «48

¬ «19

¬ «236 ¬ «7

¬ «246

¬ «42¬ «14

4

¬ «116

¬ «236

¬ «43

¬ «332

¬ «26

¬ «267

¬ «129

¬ «55

¬ «267

¬ «159

¬ «236

¬ «57

¬ «67

¬ «163

¬ «103

¬ «252

¬ «252

¬ «243

¬ «71

¬ «157

¬ «59¬ «28

¬ «3

¬ «26¬ «26

¬ «227

¬ «142

¬ «240

¬ «55¬ «16

7

¬ «28

¬ «128

¬ «18

¬ «55

¬ «38

¬ «44

¬ «252

¬ «5

¬ «931

¬ «67¬ «34

1

¬ «258

¬ «263

¬ «54

¬ «54

¬ «154

¬ «38

¬ «246

¬ «3

¬ «218

¬ «46

¬ «28

¬ «262

¬ «246

¬ «67

¬ «121

¬ «7¬ «63

¬ «129¬ «67

¬ «157

¬ «101

¬ «38

¬ «62

¬ «44

¬ «67

¬ «22

¬ «101

¬ «11

¬ «32

¬ «58¬ «56

¬ «352

¬ «159

¬ «37

¬ «29

¬ «28

¬ «44¬ «67

¬ «71

¬ «1¬ «46

¬ «109

¬ «446

¬ «135

¬ «38

¬ «45

¬ «37

¬ «28

¬ «236

¬ «25

¬ «43

¬ «244

¬ «75

¬ «47

¬ «350

¬ «54

¬ «229

¬ «26

¬ «227

¬ «213

¬ «3

¬ «28

¬ «48

¬ «25

¬ «3

¬ «234

¬ «39

¬ «45

¬ «48

¬ «32

¬ «18

¬ «19¬ «28

¬ «39

¬ «46

¬ «58

¬ «46

¬ «44

¬ «32

¬ «75

¬ «47

¬ «135

¬ «46

¬ «1

¬ «9

¬ «38

¬ «3

¬ «18¬ «18

¬ «1

¬ «13

¬ «234

¬ «9

¬ «42

¬ «37

¬ «63

¬ «59

¬ «32

¬ «26

£ ¤35

£ ¤231

£ ¤421

£ ¤150

£ ¤136

£ ¤35

£ ¤421

£ ¤35

£ ¤35

£ ¤31

£ ¤136

£ ¤31

£ ¤421

£ ¤40

£ ¤40

£ ¤52 £ ¤3

6

£ ¤36

£ ¤50

£ ¤52

£ ¤27

£ ¤231

£ ¤41

£ ¤41

§̈ ¦275

§̈ ¦865§̈ ¦46

5

§̈ ¦69 §̈ ¦74

§̈ ¦70

§̈ ¦65

VE

RM

ILLI

ON

PA

RK

E

MO

NR

OE

LA

WR

EN

CE

MO

NT

GO

ME

RY

CL

IN

TO

N

UN

ION

RA

ND

OL

PH

WA

YN

E

FOU

NTA

IN

PU

TN

AM

HE

ND

RIC

KS

TIP

PE

CA

NO

E

CA

RR

OLL

BA

RT

HO

LO

ME

W

HA

NC

OC

K

MIA

MI

GR

AN

T

WE

LL

SA

DA

MS

BE

NT

ON

JOH

NS

ON

JA

Y

VI

GO

OW

EN

MO

RG

AN

CA

SS

TI

PT

ON

MA

DIS

ON

BLA

CK

FOR

D

GR

EE

NE

MA

RIO

N

HA

MIL

TO

N

JEN

NIN

GS

JEFF

ER

SO

N

HE

NR

Y

DE

AR

BO

RN

BR

OW

N

JA

CK

SO

N

SU

LL

IVA

N

CL

AY

WA

RR

EN

BO

ON

E

RIP

LE

Y

RU

SH

OH

IO

FR

AN

KL

IN

WH

IT

E

SH

EL

BY

DE

CA

TU

R

DE

LA

WA

RE

FAY

ETT

E

0601

8902

3204

5301

4102

4907

1201

3401

8403

5402

1202

8002

3002

4104

4901

4909

7902

8301

1202

7302

6702

3206

8403

8403

3201

7301

6704

7001

6701

5302

3202

7903

3201

2501

3802

0803

2904

2101

1008

5401

5408

3205

4101

1801

1009

1008

0602

0602

4803

4803

4803

0603

1802

5501

5304

5303

6703

670554

04

5407

3402

3403 49

06

2102

8901

4802

Ü 010

5M

iles

Dat

e: 8

/12/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Cen

tral

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

yN

ew R

ail C

apac

ity(n

ew ra

il lin

e or

add

edca

paci

ty)

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

7

◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING INTERSTATE/HIGHWAY GOALS

◆◆ Project 0601: US 421 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 3-lane segment to 4-lane segment of US 421 from I-465 at North Michigan Road to West 126th Street in Zionsville. Also, widen 2-lane segment to 3-lane segment of US 421 from West 126th Street in Zionsville to SR 28 in Frankfort. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on US 421 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Cost: $83.8 million

◆◆ Project 0602: I-65/I-69 Connector – Connect I-65 and I-69 near SR 47 with Interstate grade road. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on I-65, I-465 and I-69 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Cost: $1.02 billion

◆◆ Project 1008: I-65 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 4-lane rural segments of the Interstate to a minimum of 6 lanes. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion on I-65 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 1801: I-69 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 4-lane rural segments of I-69 to a minimum of 6 lanes. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along I-69 creating better truck flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Cost: $310 million

◆◆ Project 2101: Connersville Connector – Reconstruct and widen SR 1 as a 4-lane divided expressway from Connersville at West 30th Street to I-70. Reason: Ensure global access by connecting cities based on impact and potential to Interstate-like access.


◆◆ Project 2501: US 31 Indianapolis to Benton Harbor, MI – Complete the existing 4-lane highway to a 4-lane full access-controlled freeway with interchanges at major intersections on US 31 from I-465 in Indianapolis to I-94 and I-196 at Benton Harbor, Michigan. Reason: Relieve the combined bottleneck truck and passenger car congestion on US 31 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 3201: Ronald Reagan Parkway Extension – Complete Ronald Reagan Parkway from SR 136 to I-65 at Exit 133. Reason: Relieve the combined bottleneck truck and passenger car congestion on I-65; I-465; I-70; I-74 and US 36 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


8

◆◆ Project 3202: US 36 Corridor – Convert US 36 to freeway-like access from I-465 to Danville, Indiana. Reason: Relieve the combined bottleneck truck and passenger car congestion on US 36 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 3205: I-70/I-74 Connector – Connect I-70 and I-74 near SR 39 with Interstate grade road. Reason: Relieve the combined bottleneck truck and passenger car congestion on I-65; I-465; I-70 and I-74 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 3802: US 27 Improvements – Improve and widen US 27 to a “Super-2” from Monroe, Indiana, to I-70 in Richmond, Indiana. Reason: Safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo and creating economic development by allowing for easier truck access to and from communities from Fort Wayne, Indiana, to Richmond, Indiana.


◆◆ Project 4101: I-69 Completion – Complete the build and design of a 4-lane Interstate from SR 45/58 and US 231 at Scotland to I-465 in Indianapolis (Segments 5 and 6). Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 70/SR 41 creating better traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 4803: Indiana Commerce Connector – Construct an outer loop outside I-465 connecting Madison, Hamilton, Hancock, Shelby, Johnson, Morgan, Hendricks and Boone counties from I-69 to I-65. Reason: Relieve the combined bottleneck truck and passenger car congestion on I-65; I-69; I-465; I-70 and I-74 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 4909: I-465 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 2-lane segments of I-465 to a minimum of 3 lanes from West 86th Street to Michigan Road. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along I-465 creating better truck flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 5401: US 231 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 2-lane segment to 4-lane segment of US 231 from Lafayette to I-74 in Crawfordsville. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along US 231 creating better truck flow for the movement of cargo.


9

◆◆ Project 5408: US 32 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 2-lane segment to 4-lane segment of US 32 from I-65 at Lebanon to East Crawfordsville Truck Route in Crawfordsville. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 7001: SR 3 Improvements – Improve and widen SR 3 from I-70 at Exit 123 to I-74 at Exit 134. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on SR 3 creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 8403: I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck Lanes – Widen existing 4-lane rural segments of I-70 to a minimum of 6 lanes from state line to state line. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion along I-70 creating better truck flow for the movement of cargo.


◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING RAIL GOALS

EXPAND THE SENATE AVENUE RAIL YARD IN INDIANAPOLIS

◆◆ Project 4910: Senate Avenue Intermodal – Expand the Senate Avenue Rail Yard in Indianapolis that provides direct West Coast intermodal rail service from Prince Rupert and Vancouver, Canada, via the CN and Indiana Rail Road Company. Reason: Provide direct rail access leading to the improvement and establishment of intermodal service facilities.

Estimated Cost: Not Applicable

◆ REGIONAL TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING WATERBORNE GOALS

SUPPORT RECONSTRUCTION OF SOO AND OLMSTED LOCKS

◆◆ Project 4517: Soo Locks – Construct a new lock to ease the passage of large vessels between Lake Superior ports and steel mills and power plants that support the businesses of the Central Region. Reason: Create better connectivity of Indiana’s water ports.


◆◆ Project 6506: Olmsted Lock Reconstruction – Replace Locks and Dams 52 and 53, known as the Olmsted Locks and Dam, which are under construction between Illinois and Kentucky upstream from the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. Olmsted will replace Locks and Dams 52 and 53 and greatly reduce tow and barge delays through the busiest stretch of river in America’s inland waterways. Reason: Create better connectivity of Indiana’s water ports.


10

◆ LOCAL PRIORITY PROJECTS

PROJECT # COUNTY CENTRAL LOCAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4

2904 Hamilton SR 37 Limited Access

0603 Boone Anson Interchange Expansion

3001 Hancock North CR 600 West Improvements

3203 Hendricks CR 100 South Improvements

3204 Hendricks CSX Avon Yard Entrance

3206 Hendricks West Danville Truck Corridor

3207 Hendricks CR 200 South Improvements

3405 Howard SR 26 Additional Lanes

3407 Howard Northwest Kokomo Truck Corridor

4104 Johnson SR 252 Extension

4802 Madison SR 13 Interchange Improvement

4901 Marion I-70/I-65 Two Splits

4902 Marion South West Street Industrial Corridor

4903 Marion South Harding Street Rail Grade Separation

4906 Marion Northeast Corridor Interchange Improvements

4907 Marion North Michigan Road Additional Lanes

4908 Marion North Michigan Road Intersection Improvements

5301 Monroe South Bloomington Truck Corridor

7903 Tippecanoe US 52 Additional Lanes

1202 Clinton Northern Frankfort Truck Corridor

1802 Delaware SR 28/SR 67/SR 167 Intersection Improvements

2102 Fayette North Central Avenue Rail Grade Separation

3002 Hancock West CR 300 North Improvements

3403 Howard East Boulevard/SR 931 Intersection Improvements

4102 Johnson Whiteland Road Improvements

5302 Monroe, Owen SR 46 Improvements

5402 Montgomery Memorial Drive Extension

11

PROJECT # COUNTY CENTRAL LOCAL PROJECTS TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 4

5403 Montgomery East Crawfordsville Truck Route

5404 Montgomery East Market Street Rail Grade Separation

5406 Montgomery CSX Transfer Rail Station

5407 Montgomery Nucor Road Overpass

5501 Hendricks, Morgan I-70/SR 39 Interchange Improvements

6701 Putnam East Greencastle Truck Corridor

6702 Putnam US 231 Additional Lanes

6703 Putnam US 231 Intersection Improvements

6705 Putnam CSX Rail Bridge Replacement

7301 Shelby West Shelbyville Truck Corridor

7302 Johnson, Shelby SR 44 Improvements

7902 Tippecanoe South Tippecanoe Truck Corridor

8902 Wayne Midwest Industrial Park Rail Extension

0803 Clinton Western Southern Railroad Rail Line Extension

1201 Clinton West CR 0 North Improvements

3401 Howard West Morgan Street Extension

3402 Howard East Lincoln Road/SR 931 Intersection Improvements

3404 Howard Touby Pike Additional Lanes

3406 Howard West Defenbaugh Street Improvements

5303 Monroe Arlington Road/West 17th Street/North Monroe Street Intersection Improvements

5405 Montgomery CSX Railroad Track Removal

6704 Putnam, Morgan SR 75 Extension

6706 Putnam Stardust Road Improvements

7904 Tippecanoe Steel Site Industrial Park Improvements

8002 Tipton Tipton Agriculture Corridor

8301 Vermillion Vermillion Rise Mega Park Improvements

8901 Wayne Norfolk Southern Transloading Facility

5304 Monroe South Rockport Road/West Tapp Road/West Country Club Drive Intersection Improvements

12

◆◆

*Pro

ject

060

1: U

S 42

1 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

060

2: I-

65/I

-69

Con

nect

or –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

Proj

ect 0

603:

Ans

on In

terc

hang

e Ex

pans

ion

– Re

-eng

inee

r, re

confi

gure

and

rede

sign

SR 2

67 In

terc

hang

e at

Exi

t 133

. Re

ason

: Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pa

ssen

ger c

ar tr

affic

cre

atin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $3

4.8

milli

on

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

8: I-

65 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

320

1: R

onal

d Re

agan

Par

kway

Ext

ensi

on –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

480

3: In

dian

a C

omm

erce

Con

nect

or –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

490

9: I-

465

Add

ition

al L

anes

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pr

ojec

t refl

ecte

d on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

540

8: U

S 32

Add

ition

al L

anes

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pr

ojec

t refl

ecte

d on

the

map

on

page

6.

BO

ON

E CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

!

¬ «38

¬ «267

¬ «234

¬ «38

¬ «75¬ «75

¬ «39

¬ «39

¬ «47¬ «47

¬ «47

¬ «32¬ «32

¬ «32

£ ¤136

£ ¤52

£ ¤421

£ ¤421

§̈ ¦465

§̈ ¦865

§̈ ¦74

§̈ ¦65

Zion

svill

e

Adva

nce

Jam

esto

wn

Thor

ntow

n

Leba

non

Whi

test

own

Ule

n

0601

0601

4909

4909

3201

4803

1008

5408

5408

0602

0602

0603

Ü 02.

51.

25M

iles

Dat

e: 8

/12/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; B

oone

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

£ ¤31

14

BROWN COUNTYPROJECTS

Nothing local that affects the movement of cargo.

¬«58

¬«45

¬«135

¬«135

¬«135

¬«135

¬«46

¬«46

Nashville

PrincesLakes

Ü0 2.51.25

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015

Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 16NProjection: Transverse MercatorDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 500,000.0000False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -87.0000Scale Factor: 0.9996Latitude Of Origin: 0.0000Units: Meter

Private Sector Identified Regional Needs

Data: Indiana GIS Library & Stakeholder InputINDOT Engineering & Asset Management

Please Note: This map depicts non-committed, non-funded, conceptual regional transportationinfrastructure needs identified by the private sector. These needs are displayed as placeholdersfor graphic representation. Use of this map should be limited to preliminary planning purposesonly. Additional planning, environmental study, and cost-benefit analysis is needed to identifyoptimum alternatives, actual corridor alignments, and system impact to support further decisionmaking. Also note, the data used to create this map are from the best known source at thetime and is subject to change.

Central Region ; Brown County

Identified EnhancementCategories for Local andState Facilities

Mobility Improvements(Added travel lanes,freeway upgrade)

State Facility

New Terrain, StateFacility

Local Facility

New Terrain, LocalFacility

New Rail Capacity (newrail line or addedcapacity)

Operational Improvements(Intersection improvements,new interchange, interchangemodification, and spotimprovements)

! State Facility

! Local Facility

¹º»¼Rail CrossingImprovement

Multi-ModalEnhancements

o Airport Improvements

!Î Port Improvements

Other FacilitiesNon-Interstate

Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits

State Facilities are US, StateRoute, or US Highway funded with state and federal funds.Local Facilities are non-statejursidiction facilities that can usestate or local funds.

16

CLI

NTO

N C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

◆◆

*Pro

ject

060

1: U

S 42

1 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

,

◆◆

Proj

ect 0

803:

Wes

tern

Sou

ther

n Ra

ilroa

d Ra

il Li

ne

Exte

nsio

n –

Insta

ll ne

w ra

il ro

ad ti

es b

etw

een

Brin

ghur

st to

th

e C

SX ra

il lin

e in

Fra

nkfo

rt. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck

of ra

il co

nges

tion

thro

ugh

Car

roll

and

Clin

ton

coun

ties

crea

ting

bette

r rai

l tra

ffic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $1

8.7

milli

on

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

8: I-

65 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

201:

Wes

t CR

0 N

orth

Impr

ovem

ents

– Im

prov

e an

d w

iden

Wes

t CR

0 N

orth

from

Nor

th C

R 20

0 W

est

to N

orth

CR

700

Wes

t. Re

ason

: Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of

com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on o

n SR

28

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $2

3.8

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 1

202:

Nor

ther

n Fr

ankf

ort T

ruck

Cor

ridor

– D

esig

n an

d bu

ild a

new

road

from

Wes

t SR

28 a

t Nor

th C

R 20

0 W

est t

o Ea

st SR

28

at N

orth

CR

250

East.

Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on

on S

R 28

/U

S 42

1/SR

39

thro

ugh

Fran

kfor

t cre

atin

g be

tter

truck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

. Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$40.

7 m

illion

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

¬ «28

¬ «39

¬ «38

¬ «38

¬ «28¬ «28

¬ «75¬ «29

¬ «38

¬ «38

¬ «26¬ «26

¬ «26

£ ¤52

£ ¤421

£ ¤421

§̈ ¦65

Col

fax

Kirk

lin

Fran

kfor

t

Mic

higa

ntow

n

Ros

svill

e

Mul

berry

1201

1202

1202

08030803

1008

1008

0601

0601

Ü 02.

51.

25M

iles

Dat

e: 8

/12/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; C

linto

n C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

yN

ew T

erra

in, S

tate

Faci

lity

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

y

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

£ ¤31

18

DELAWARE COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 1801: I-69 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ Project 1802: SR 28/SR 67/SR 167 Intersection Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign SR 28/SR 67/SR 167 intersection. Reason: Ensure the safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


* These projects are reflected in other sections of this report.

!

§̈¦69

¬«28

¬«67

¬«236

¬«67

¬«26

¬«332

¬«167

¬«28

¬«3

¬«3

¬«67

¬«32

¬«32

£¤35

£¤35

£¤35

Eaton

Daleville

Yorktown

Gaston

Muncie

Albany

Chesterfield

Selma

1801

1802

Ü0 31.5

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Delaware County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


20

FAYETTE COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 2101: Connersville Connector Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ Project 2102: North Central Avenue Rail Grade Separation – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the rail grade separation on North Central Avenue near East 10th Street. Reason: Ensure the safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.



!¬«44

¬«44

¬«121

¬«121

¬«1

¬«1

¬«1

£¤52

£¤40

Connersville

Glenwood

2102

Ü0 21

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Fayette County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


2101

22

FOUNTAIN COUNTYPROJECTS


§̈¦74

¬«28

¬«25

¬«341

¬«341

¬«55

¬«28

¬«55

¬«28

¬«341

¬«263

¬«25

¬«25

¬«234¬«234

¬«32

¬«32

¬«63

¬«63

¬«63

£¤136

£¤136

£¤41

£¤41

£¤41

Kingman

VeedersburgHillsboro

Attica

Mellott

Covington

Wallace

Newtown

Ü0 31.5

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Fountain County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


24

◆◆

*Pro

ject

060

2: I-

65/I

-69

Con

nect

or –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

180

1: I-

69 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

250

1: U

S 31

Indi

anap

olis

to B

ento

n H

arbo

r, M

I –

This

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

Proj

ect 2

904:

Pro

ject

SR

37 L

imite

d A

cces

s –

Free

way

-lik

e ac

cess

from

I-69

to th

e I-6

5/I-6

9 C

onne

ctor

. Re

ason

: Re

lieve

the

bottl

enec

k of

com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

co

nges

tion

on S

R 37

cre

atin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $2

65.4

milli

on

HA

MIL

TON

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

¬ «38

¬ «9

¬ «128

¬ «47

¬ «213

¬ «38

¬ «19

¬ «37

¬ «37

¬ «38

¬ «38

¬ «13

¬ «13

¬ «32¬ «32

¬ «32

£ ¤36

£ ¤421

£ ¤31

£ ¤31

§̈ ¦65§̈ ¦86

5

§̈ ¦465

§̈ ¦69

Atla

nta

Wes

tfiel

d

Arca

dia

Car

mel

Sher

idan

Cic

ero

Fish

ersN

oble

svill

e

2501

0601

1801

2904

2904

0602

0602

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; H

amilt

on C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

26

HA

NCO

CK

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

001:

Nor

th C

R 60

0 W

est I

mpr

ovem

ents

– W

iden

an

d im

prov

e N

orth

CR

600

Wes

t fro

m E

ast 9

6th

Stre

et in

Fi

sher

s to

I-70

. Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er c

onge

stion

on

Nor

th C

R 60

0 W

est b

y th

e In

dian

apol

is Re

gion

al A

irpor

t at M

ount

Com

fort

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $3

2 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

002:

Wes

t CR

300

Nor

th Im

prov

emen

ts –

Wid

en

and

impr

ove

Wes

t CR

300

Nor

th fr

om N

orth

CR

700

Wes

t to

Nor

th C

R 40

0 W

est.

Reas

on: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f co

mbi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er c

onge

stion

on

Wes

t CR

300

Nor

th b

y th

e In

dian

apol

is Re

gion

al A

irpor

t at M

ount

Com

fort

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $1

.26

milli

on

◆◆

*Pro

ject

480

3: In

dian

a C

omm

erce

Con

nect

or –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

840

3: I-

70 T

hird

Lan

e/D

edic

ated

Tru

ck L

anes

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

¬ «37¬ «13

¬ «140

¬ «109

¬ «109

¬ «9

¬ «9¬ «23

4¬ «23

4£ ¤3

6

£ ¤52

£ ¤40

£ ¤40

§̈ ¦69

§̈ ¦74

§̈ ¦70

Sprin

gLa

ke

Fortv

ille

Shirl

ey

New

Pale

stin

e

McC

ords

ville

Wilk

inso

n

Cum

berla

nd

Gre

enfie

ld

3001

3002

8403

8403

3002

4803

4803

PO

PE

FIE

LD

IND

IAN

AP

OLI

SR

EG

ION

AL

AIR

PO

RT

Ü 02.

51.

25M

iles

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; H

anco

ck C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

28

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

8: I-

65 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

320

1: R

onal

d Re

agan

Par

kway

Ext

ensi

on –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

320

2: U

S 36

Cor

ridor

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

203:

CR

100

Sout

h Im

prov

emen

ts –

Wid

en a

nd

impr

ove

CR

100

Sout

h fro

m D

an Jo

nes

Road

to R

onal

d Re

agan

Par

kway

. Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of

com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on o

n C

R 10

0 So

uth

by th

e in

dustr

ies

in P

lain

field

cre

atin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $8

.5 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

204:

CSX

Avo

n Ya

rd E

ntra

nce

– D

esig

n an

d bu

ild a

ne

w e

ntra

nce

to A

von

Yard

from

CR

100

Sout

h ne

ar A

llpoi

nts

Cou

rt to

Mai

n Ro

ad in

Avo

n Ya

rd. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on o

n U

S 36

cre

atin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

. Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$3.5

milli

on

◆◆

*Pro

ject

320

5: I-

70/I

-74

Con

nect

or –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

206:

Wes

t Dan

ville

Tru

ck C

orrid

or –

Des

ign

and

build

a n

ew ro

ad fr

om N

orth

SR

39 a

t Nor

th C

R 20

0 W

est

to S

outh

SR

39 a

t Wes

t CR

200

Sout

h. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on o

n SR

39

thro

ugh

Dan

ville

cre

atin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r th

e m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $2

5.2

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

207:

CR

200

Sout

h Im

prov

emen

ts –

Wid

en a

nd

impr

ove

CR

200

Sout

h fro

m D

an Jo

nes

Road

to R

onal

d Re

agan

Par

kway

. Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of

com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on o

n C

R 20

0 So

uth

by th

e in

dustr

ies

in P

lain

field

cre

atin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $1

2.1

milli

on.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

480

3: In

dian

a C

omm

erce

Con

nect

or –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

Proj

ect 5

501:

I-70

/SR

39 In

terc

hang

e Im

prov

emen

ts –

Re

-eng

inee

r, re

confi

gure

and

rede

sign

the

I-70

inte

rcha

nge

at

SR 3

9. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd

pass

enge

r car

traf

fic c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$3.5

milli

on

◆◆

*Pro

ject

840

3: I-

70 T

hird

Lan

e/D

edic

ated

Tru

ck L

anes

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

HEN

DR

ICK

S CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

!

¬ «134

¬ «267

¬ «144

¬ «267

¬ «42

¬ «267

¬ «37¬ «24

0¬ «67

¬ «234

¬ «39

¬ «39

¬ «236

¬ «236

¬ «75

¬ «75

£ ¤421

£ ¤231

£ ¤136

£ ¤36

£ ¤36

£ ¤40

£ ¤40

§̈ ¦865

§̈ ¦65§̈ ¦74

§̈ ¦465

§̈ ¦70

Lizt

on

Amo

Pitts

boro

Coa

tesv

ille

Stile

svill

e

Nor

thSa

lem

Dan

ville

Plai

nfie

ldC

layt

on

Avon

Brow

nsbu

rg

3204

8403

3203

3207

3201

3206

3202

3201

3201

3205

3205

4803

4803

5501

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; H

endr

icks

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

8403

30

◆◆

*Pro

ject

700

1: S

R 3

Impr

ovem

ents

– Th

is is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

840

3: I-

70 T

hird

Lan

e/D

edic

ated

Tru

ck L

anes

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

HEN

RY

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

¬ «32

¬ «140

¬ «232

¬ «3

¬ «1¬ «9

¬ «103

¬ «236

¬ «103

¬ «234

¬ «234

¬ «1 ¬ «1

¬ «109

¬ «109

¬ «3

¬ «3

¬ «38

¬ «38

¬ «38

£ ¤35

£ ¤40

£ ¤40

£ ¤36

£ ¤36

§̈ ¦69

§̈ ¦70

Mid

dlet

own

Dun

reith

Moo

rela

nd

Sulp

hur

Sprin

gsM

ount

Sum

mit

Cad

iz

Blou

ntsv

ille

Kenn

ard

Spic

elan

d

Sprin

gpor

t

Lew

isvi

lle

Knig

htst

own

Gre

ensb

oro

New

Cas

tle

Stra

ughn

700184

0384

03

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; H

enry

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

32

HO

WA

RD

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

◆◆

*Pro

ject

250

1: U

S 31

Indi

anap

olis

to B

ento

n H

arbo

r, M

I –

This

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

401:

Wes

t Mor

gan

Stre

et E

xten

sion

– D

esig

n an

d bu

ild a

n ex

tens

ion

of W

est M

orga

n St

reet

from

Nor

th

Philli

ps S

treet

to Ju

dson

Roa

d/W

est C

R 20

0 N

orth

at

Nor

th C

R 10

0 W

est/

Nor

th D

ixon

Roa

d. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er c

ar tr

affic

cr

eatin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$7.5

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

402:

Eas

t Lin

coln

Roa

d/SR

931

Inte

rsec

tion

Impr

ovem

ents

– Re

-eng

inee

r, re

confi

gure

and

rede

sign

the

East

Linco

ln R

oad/

SR 9

31 in

ters

ectio

n. R

easo

n: E

nsur

e th

e sa

fety

of t

ruck

s m

ovin

g ca

rgo

ensu

ring

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

. Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$2 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

403:

Eas

t Bou

leva

rd/S

R 93

1 In

ters

ectio

n Im

prov

emen

ts –

Re-e

ngin

eer,

reco

nfigu

re a

nd re

desig

n th

e Ea

st Bo

ulev

ard/

SR 9

31 in

ters

ectio

n. R

easo

n: E

nsur

e th

e sa

fety

of t

ruck

s m

ovin

g ca

rgo

ensu

ring

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$2 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

404:

Toub

y Pi

ke A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Wid

en e

xisti

ng

2-la

ne s

egm

ent t

o 4-

lane

seg

men

t of T

ouby

Pik

e fro

m U

S 31

at

Exi

t I-6

5 to

SR

931

via

East

Mor

gan

Stre

et. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er c

ar tr

affic

cr

eatin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$11.

9 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

405:

SR

26 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Wid

en e

xisti

ng

3-la

ne s

egm

ent t

o 4-

lane

seg

men

t of S

R 26

from

Sou

th D

ixon

St

reet

to U

S 31

at E

xit 1

56. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er c

ar tr

affic

cre

atin

g be

tter

truck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$28.

1 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

406:

Wes

t Def

enba

ugh

Stre

et Im

prov

emen

ts –

Wid

en a

nd im

prov

e W

est D

efen

baug

h St

reet

from

Sou

th

Dix

on S

treet

to W

est P

ark

Aven

ue. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on

on D

efen

baug

h St

reet

by

the

indu

strie

s in

Kok

omo

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $3

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 3

407:

Nor

thw

est K

okom

o Tr

uck

Cor

ridor

– D

esig

n an

d bu

ild a

new

road

from

US

35 a

t SR

931

to C

R 20

0 W

est/

Nor

th D

ixon

Roa

d at

CR

300

Nor

th. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve

the

bottle

neck

of c

ombi

ned

truck

and

pas

seng

er c

ar tr

affic

cr

eatin

g be

tter t

ruck

traf

fic fl

ow fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$9.5

milli

on

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

!!

¬ «29

¬ «19

¬ «13

¬ «19¬ «21

3

¬ «931

¬ «29¬ «29¬ «22

¬ «22

¬ «26¬ «26

¬ «26

¬ «18

¬ «18¬ «18

£ ¤35

£ ¤35

£ ¤31

£ ¤31

Koko

mo

Gre

ento

wn

Rus

siav

ille

2501

3406

3401

3404

3407

3405

3402

3403

Ü 02.

51.

25M

iles

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; H

owar

d C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

£ ¤31

34

JOHNSON COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 4101: I-69 Completion – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ Project 4102: Whiteland Road Improvements – Improve and widen Whiteland Road from I-65 to Graham Road. In addition, re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the intersection at Whiteland Road and Graham Road. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 4104: SR 252 Extension – Extend SR 252 from US 31 to I-65. In addition, design and build an interchange at SR 252 and I-65. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ *Project 4803: Indiana Commerce Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ *Project 7302: SR 44 Improvements – This is a local project reflected in the Shelby County map on page 57.


§̈¦65

¬«252

¬«144

¬«252

¬«144

¬«252

¬«37

¬«44

¬«44

¬«135

¬«135

¬«135

£¤31

£¤31

£¤31

Greenwood

Bargersville

Whiteland

PrincesLakes Edinburgh

Franklin

Trafalgar

NewWhiteland

7302

4102

4104

4101

1008

1008

4803

4803

1009

1009

Ü0 21

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Johnson County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


36

MADISON COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 0602: I-65/I-69 Connector – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.


◆◆ Project 4802: SR 13 Interchange Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign SR 13 Interchange at Exit 214. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Cost: $20 million.



!

§̈¦69

¬«232

¬«234

¬«9

¬«332

¬«67

¬«9

¬«236

¬«37

¬«213

¬«109

¬«38

¬«128

¬«32

¬«37

¬«38

¬«32

¬«32

¬«28 ¬«28

¬«9

¬«9

¬«13

¬«13

£¤35

£¤36

£¤36

Orestes

Country ClubHeights

Markleville

Edgewood

RiverForest

Pendleton

Frankton

Summitville

Ingalls

Lapel

Anderson

Alexandria

Elwood

WoodlawnHeights Chesterfield

4803

0602

1801

1801

4802

Ü0 3.51.75

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Madison County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


38

◆◆

*Pro

ject

100

8: I-

65 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

180

1: I-

69 A

dditi

onal

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

320

2: U

S 36

Cor

ridor

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

410

1: I-

69 C

ompl

etio

n –

This

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

Proj

ect 4

901:

I-70

/I-6

5 Tw

o Sp

lits

– Re

-eng

inee

r, re

confi

gure

and

re

desig

n N

orth

I-65

/I-7

0 sp

lit a

nd S

outh

I-65

/I-7

0 sp

lit. R

easo

n:

Relie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

car

traf

fic

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $8

63 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 4

902:

Sou

th W

est S

treet

Indu

stria

l Cor

ridor

– W

iden

an

d im

prov

e So

uth W

est S

treet

from

I-70

to W

est R

aym

ond

Stre

et

and

re-e

ngin

eer,

reco

nfigu

re a

nd re

desig

n th

e So

uth W

est S

treet

/W

est R

aym

ond

Stre

et in

terse

ction

. Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of

com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

con

gesti

on b

y in

dustr

ies o

n So

uth W

est

Stre

et c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $4

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 4

903:

Sou

th H

ardi

ng S

treet

Rai

l Gra

de S

epar

atio

n –

Build

and

des

ign

a ra

il gr

ade

sepa

ratio

n on

Sou

th H

ardi

ng S

treet

ne

ar th

e IP

L H

ardi

ng S

treet

Sta

tion.

Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of

com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

car

traf

fic c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck

traffi

c flo

w fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$5 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 4

906:

Nor

thea

st C

orrid

or In

terc

hang

e Im

prov

emen

ts –

Re

-eng

inee

r, re

confi

gure

and

rede

sign

the

East

82nd

Stre

et

Inte

rcha

nge

at I-

69 a

nd I-

465.

Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of

com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

car

traf

fic c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck

traffi

c flo

w fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

. Estim

ated

Cos

t: $1

00 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 4

907:

Nor

th M

ichi

gan

Road

Add

ition

al L

anes

– W

iden

ex

istin

g 3-

lane

seg

men

t to

4-la

ne s

egm

ent o

f Nor

th M

ichi

gan

Road

from

Wes

t 86t

h St

reet

to I-

465

in In

dian

apol

is. R

easo

n:

Relie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

car

traf

fic

crea

ting

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he m

ovem

ent o

f car

go.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $2

0 m

illion

◆◆

Proj

ect 4

908:

Nor

th M

ichi

gan

Road

Inte

rsec

tion

Impr

ovem

ents

– Re

-eng

inee

r, re

confi

gure

and

rede

sign

the

Nor

th M

ichi

gan

Road

in

ters

ectio

n at

Wes

t 86t

h St

reet

. Rea

son:

Rel

ieve

the

bottle

neck

of

com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd p

asse

nger

car

traf

fic c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck

traffi

c flo

w fo

r the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$4 m

illion

◆◆

*Pro

ject

490

9: I-

465

Add

ition

al L

anes

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

840

3: I-

70 T

hird

Lan

e/D

edic

ated

Tru

ck L

anes

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

MA

RIO

N C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

!

!

!

¬ «134

¬ «267

¬ «234

¬ «267

¬ «135

¬ «37¬ «26

7¬ «67

£ ¤31

£ ¤421

£ ¤31

£ ¤36

£ ¤136 £ ¤40

£ ¤40

£ ¤52

£ ¤36

§̈ ¦69§̈ ¦86

5

§̈ ¦74

§̈ ¦70

§̈ ¦65

§̈ ¦465

Beec

hG

rove

Willi

ams

Cre

ek

War

ren

Park

Sout

hpor

t

Hom

ecro

ft

Spee

dway

Nor

th C

row

sN

est

Roc

kyR

ippl

eMer

idia

nH

ills

Law

renc

e

Indi

anap

olis

Cum

berla

nd

Cle

rmon

t

Wyn

neda

le

Cro

ws

Nes

t

4902

4907

3201

4901

4909

3202

4101

1009

4903

4906

4908

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 8

/26/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Sys

tem

: NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; M

ario

n C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

y

Loca

l Fac

ility

New

Ter

rain

, Loc

alFa

cilit

yN

ew R

ail C

apac

ity(n

ew ra

il lin

e or

add

edca

paci

ty)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

£ ¤31

Sena

te A

ve.

Term

inal

0601

40

MONROE COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ Project 5301: South Bloomington Truck Corridor – Extend West Fullerton Pike from South Rockport Road to West Gordon Pike near Clear Creek Trail. Also, re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the intersection at West Gordon Pike and South Walnut Street and the intersection at East Rhorer Road and South Walnut Street Pike. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on SR 46 through Bloomington creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 5302: SR 46 Improvements – Improve and widen SR 46 from North Indiana Avenue in Ellettsville to US 231 in Spencer. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 5303: Arlington Road/West 17th Street/North Monroe Street Intersection Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the Arlington Road/West 17th Street/ North Monroe Street intersection. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 5304: South Rockport Road/West Tapp Road/West Country Club Drive Intersection Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign the South Rockport Road/West Tapp Road/West Country Club Drive intersection. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


!

!

¬«54

¬«252

¬«43 ¬«48

¬«67

¬«45

¬«46

¬«46

¬«446

¬«446

¬«45

¬«45

¬«37

¬«37

¬«37

Ellettsville

Stinesville

Bloomington

53015302

5304

5303

Ü0 31.5

Miles

Date: 8/12/2015





Central Region ; Monroe County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


42

MONTGOMERY COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 5401: US 231 Additional Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.

◆◆ Project 5402: Memorial Drive Extension – Design and build an extension of Memorial Drive from Whitlock Avenue West to US 231. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car congestion through Crawfordsville creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 5403: East Crawfordsville Truck Route – Design and build a new road from Memorial Drive at SR 47 to South US 231 near East CR 300 South. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on US 231/SR 47 through Crawfordsville creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 5404: East Market Street Rail Grade Separation – Build and design a rail grade separation on East Market Street at the CSX rail tracks. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 5405: CSX Railroad Track Removal – Remove the CSX rail line at Schenck Road to US 231. Reason: Ensure the safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo. Also relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic in Crawfordsville creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 5406: CSX Transfer Rail Station – Design and build a new rail transfer station at East CR 200 South. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of rail traffic creating better rail traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 5407: Nucor Road Overpass – Design and build an overpass at US 136 and Nucor Road. Reason: Safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.




! !

§̈¦74

¬«236

¬«28

¬«55

¬«25

¬«59 ¬«236

¬«32

¬«32

¬«236

¬«25

¬«47

¬«47

¬«47

¬«28 ¬«28

¬«234

¬«234

£¤52

£¤136

£¤136

£¤231

£¤231

NewMarket

New Ross

Crawfordsville

Waynetown

NewRichmond

Wingate

Waveland

Alamo

Darlington

Ladoga

Linden

5406

5402

540554

03

5408

5401

54045407

Ü0 31.5

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Montgomery County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


44

◆◆

*Pro

ject

410

1: I-

69 C

ompl

etio

n –

This

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

480

3: In

dian

a C

omm

erce

Con

nect

or –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

670

4: S

R 75

Ext

ensi

on –

Thi

s is

a lo

cal p

roje

ct

refle

cted

in th

e Pu

tman

Cou

nty

map

on

page

51.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

840

3: I-

70 T

hird

Lan

e/D

edic

ated

Tru

ck L

anes

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

MO

RG

AN

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

!

¬ «75

¬ «267

¬ «240

¬ «42

¬ «144

¬ «252

¬ «135

¬ «142

¬ «44

¬ «67

¬ «67

¬ «67

¬ «39

¬ «39

¬ «42

¬ «42

¬ «37

¬ «37

¬ «37

£ ¤231

£ ¤40

§̈ ¦70

Mar

tinsv

ille

Mor

gant

own

Beth

any

Broo

klyn

Moo

resv

ille

Para

gon

Mon

rovi

a

8403

4803

4803

4101

4101

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; M

orga

n C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

6704

8403

46

OW

EN C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

◆◆

*Pro

ject

530

2: S

R 46

Impr

ovem

ents

– Th

is is

a lo

cal p

roje

ct

refle

cted

in th

e M

onro

e C

ount

y m

ap o

n pa

ge 4

0.

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

¬ «45

¬ «246

¬ «243

¬ «48¬ «48

¬ «37

¬ «67

¬ «43

¬ «157

¬ «46

¬ «246

¬ «42¬ «42

¬ «46

¬ «46

¬ «59¬ «59

£ ¤231

£ ¤231

§̈ ¦70

Spen

cer

Gos

port

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; O

wen

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

5302

48

PARKE COUNTYPROJECTS


¬«71

¬«236

¬«341

¬«163

¬«236

¬«47

¬«59

¬«59

¬«234 ¬«234

¬«63

¬«63

¬«63

£¤150

£¤40

£¤36

£¤36

£¤41

£¤41

£¤41

Mecca

Montezuma

Rosedale

Rockville

Marshall

Bloomingdale

Ü0 31.5

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Parke County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


50

PUTNAM COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ Project 6701: East Greencastle Truck Corridor – Design and build a new road from US 231 North of Greencastle at West CR 75 North to South US 231 near East CR 350 South. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on US 231 through Greencastle creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 6702: US 231 Additional Lanes – Widen existing 2-lane segment to 4-lane segment of US 231 from I-70 to Veterans Memorial Highway/SR 240 in Greencastle. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 6703: US 231 Intersection Improvements – Re-engineer, reconfigure and redesign US 231 providing turn lanes and acceleration lanes at intersection of East CR 800 South. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 6704: SR 75 Extension – Design and build an extension of SR 75 from US 40 to I-70 Exit 51. Reason: Create economic development by giving increased access to the industrial areas of Eastern Greencastle.


◆◆ Project 6705: CSX Rail Bridge Replacement – Design and build a new replacement rail bridge over US 231 south of West CR 25 South. Reason: Safety of trucks moving cargo ensuring better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 6706: Stardust Road Improvements – Widen existing road from US 231 to South CR 125 East. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ *Project 8403: I-70 Third Lane/Dedicated Truck Lanes – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.


!

!

§̈¦70

¬«142

¬«236

¬«243

¬«240

¬«236¬«236

¬«75

¬«75

¬«42

¬«42

£¤36 £¤36

£¤40

£¤40

£¤231

£¤231

£¤231

Russellville

Greencastle

Roachdale

Cloverdale

Fillmore

Bainbridge

8403

8403

6706

6702

6704

6701

6703

6705

Ü0 31.5

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Putnam County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


52

◆◆

*Pro

ject

380

2: U

S 27

Impr

ovem

ents

– Th

is is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

RA

ND

OLP

H C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

!

¬ «67

¬ «167

¬ «1

¬ «67

¬ «32

¬ «227

¬ «32¬ «32

¬ «1

¬ «1

¬ «28¬ «28

¬ «28

£ ¤35

£ ¤35

£ ¤27

£ ¤27

£ ¤36

£ ¤36

Farm

land

Park

erC

ity

Losa

ntvi

lle

Win

ches

ter

Alba

ny

Sara

toga

Mod

oc

Rid

gevi

lle

Uni

onC

ity

Lynn

3802

3802

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; R

ando

lph

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

54

RUSH COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ *Project 7001: SR 3 Improvements – This is a regional project reflected on the map on page 6.


§̈¦74

¬«103¬«3¬«109

¬«140

¬«44

¬«44

¬«3

¬«3

¬«3

¬«3

¬«244 ¬«244

£¤40

£¤40

£¤52

£¤52

Carthage

Rushville

Glenwood70

01

7001

7001

Ü0 2.51.25

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Rush County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


56

SHELBY COUNTYPROJECTS


◆◆ Project 7301: West Shelbyville Truck Corridor – Design and build a new road from West CR 400 North near I-74 exit 109 to SR 44. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger congestion on SR 9/SR 44 through Shelbyville creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.

Estimated Project: $50.4 million

◆◆ Project 7302: SR 44 Improvements – Improve and widen SR 44 from I-65 to Miller Avenue in Shelbyville. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.



§̈¦65

§̈¦74

¬«244

¬«252

¬«44

¬«44

¬«9

¬«9

¬«9

£¤31

£¤52

£¤52

Shelbyville

St. Paul

Edinburgh

Fairland

Morristown

7302

7301

480348

03

Ü0 2.51.25

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Shelby County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


58

TIPPECANOE COUNTYPROJECTS



◆◆ Project 7902: South Tippecanoe Truck Corridor – Improve and widen Veterans Memorial Boulevard from US 231 to 9th Street. Reason: : Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 7903: US 52 Additional Lanes – Convert the existing 4 lanes to 6 lanes along US 52 from East County Road 450 South to SR 25/Schuyler Avenue. Reason: Relieve the bottleneck of combined truck and passenger car traffic creating better truck traffic flow for the movement of cargo.


◆◆ Project 7904: Steel Site Industrial Park Improvements – Design and build a new entrance North of the Steel Site Industrial Park at SR 38. Reason: Create economic development by allowing for expansion of Steel Site Industrial Park.



§̈¦65

¬«43

¬«28

¬«28

¬«55

¬«225

¬«43

¬«26

¬«26

¬«38

¬«25

¬«18¬«18

¬«25

¬«25

¬«28 ¬«28

£¤421

£¤231

£¤231

£¤231

£¤52

£¤52

£¤52

Otterbein

WestLafayette

Dayton

Shadeland

BattleGround

Lafayette

ClarksHill

79047902

7903

5401

1008

1008

Ü0 31.5

Miles

Date: 8/12/2015





Central Region ; Tipecanoe County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


Central Region ; Tippecanoe County

60

TIPTO

N C

OU

NTY

PRO

JEC

TS

◆◆

*Pro

ject

250

1: U

S 31

Indi

anap

olis

to B

ento

n H

arbo

r, M

I –

This

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6.

◆◆

Proj

ect 8

002:

Tip

ton

Agr

icul

ture

Cor

ridor

– D

esig

n an

d bu

ild a

new

road

from

Div

ision

Roa

d Ea

st of

US

31 to

SR

28. R

easo

n: R

elie

ve th

e bo

ttlene

ck o

f com

bine

d tru

ck a

nd

pass

enge

r car

traf

fic c

reat

ing

bette

r tru

ck tr

affic

flow

for t

he

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$14

milli

on

* Th

ese

proj

ects

are

refle

cted

in o

ther

sec

tions

of t

his

repo

rt.

¬ «128

¬ «931

¬ «28¬ «28

¬ «28¬ «28

¬ «13

¬ «13

¬ «19

¬ «19

¬ «213 ¬ «213

¬ «26¬ «26

£ ¤31

£ ¤31

Win

dfal

l

Shar

psvi

lle

Kem

pton

Tipt

on25012501 8002

Ü 02

1M

iles

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; T

ipto

n C

ount

y

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

62

UN

ION

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

Not

hing

loca

l tha

t affe

cts

the

mov

emen

t of c

argo

.

¬ «1

¬ «227

¬ «44

¬ «101

¬ «1

¬ «44¬ «44

£ ¤27

£ ¤27

Wes

tC

olle

geC

orne

r

Libe

rty

Ü 02

1M

iles

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; U

nion

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

64

VERMILLION COUNTYPROJECTS

◆◆ Project 8301: Vermillion Rise Mega Park Improvements – Design and build a new entrance North of the Vermillion Rise Mega Park West of SR 63 and East of CR 200 East and widen the 4 existing roads surrounding the Mega Park. Reason: Create economic development by allowing for expansion of Vermillion Rise Mega.


§̈¦74

¬«263

¬«236

¬«47

¬«163

¬«71

¬«71

¬«234

¬«234

¬«32

¬«32

¬«63

¬«63

£¤150

£¤136

£¤136

£¤36

£¤36

£¤41

£¤41

£¤41

Newport

Universal

Clinton

Cayuga

Perrysville

Dana

FairviewPark

8301

Ü0 42

Miles

Date: 6/22/2015





Central Region ; Vermillion County



State Facility


Local Facility




! State Facility

! Local Facility






Interstate

Existing Rail

Navigable Streams

Corp. Limits


66

WAY

NE

CO

UN

TYPR

OJE

CTS

◆◆

*Pro

ject

210

1: C

onne

rsvi

lle C

onne

ctor

Lan

es –

Thi

s is

a re

gion

al p

roje

ct re

flect

ed o

n th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

380

2: U

S 27

Impr

ovem

ents

– Th

is is

a re

gion

al

proj

ect r

eflec

ted

on th

e m

ap o

n pa

ge 6

.

◆◆

*Pro

ject

840

3: I-

70 T

hird

Lan

e/D

edic

ated

Tru

ck L

anes

– T

his

is a

regi

onal

pro

ject

refle

cted

on

the

map

on

page

6?.

◆◆

Proj

ect 8

901:

Nor

folk

Sou

ther

n Tr

anslo

adin

g Fa

cilit

y –

Des

ign

and

build

a n

ew tr

anslo

adin

g fa

cilit

y at

the

form

er

Dan

a C

orpo

ratio

n sit

e at

Will

iam

sbur

g Pi

ke.

Reas

on:

Cre

ate

econ

omic

dev

elop

men

t giv

ing

furth

er ra

il ac

cess

to

indu

stria

l pro

duct

s.

Estim

ated

Cos

t: $6

milli

on

◆◆

Proj

ect 8

902:

Mid

wes

t Ind

ustri

al P

ark

Rail

Exte

nsio

n –

Exte

nd

the

Nor

folk

Sout

hern

rail

track

s th

roug

hout

the

Mid

wes

t In

dustr

ial P

ark.

Rea

son:

Cre

ate

econ

omic

dev

elop

men

t giv

ing

furth

er ra

il ac

cess

to W

ayne

Cou

nty

indu

strie

s.Es

timat

ed C

ost:

$2.4

milli

on

¹º»¼

¬ «121 ¬ «227

¬ «227

¬ «38

¬ «38

¬ «1

¬ «1

£ ¤36

£ ¤35

£ ¤27

£ ¤27

£ ¤40

£ ¤40

§̈ ¦70

Dub

linC

ambr

idge

City

Econ

omy

Foun

tain

City

Whi

tew

ater

Mt.

Aubu

rn

Ric

hmon

d

Milt

on

East

Ger

man

tow

n

Sprin

gG

rove

Cen

terv

ille

Gre

ens

Fork

Hag

erst

own

Bost

on

3802

8902

8403

8403

8403

2101

8901

Ü 03

1.5

Mile

s

Dat

e: 6

/22/

2015

Coo

rdin

ate

Syst

em: N

AD 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 16

NPr

ojec

tion:

Tra

nsve

rse

Mer

cato

rD

atum

: Nor

th A

mer

ican

198

3Fa

lse

Eas

ting:

500

,000

.000

0Fa

lse

Nor

thin

g: 0

.000

0C

entra

l Mer

idia

n: -8

7.00

00Sc

ale

Fact

or: 0

.999

6La

titud

e O

f Orig

in: 0

.000

0U

nits

: Met

er

Priv

ate

Sec

tor I

dent

ified

Reg

iona

l N

eeds

Dat

a: In

dian

a G

IS L

ibra

ry &

Sta

keho

lder

Inpu

tIN

DO

T E

ngin

eerin

g &

Ass

et M

anag

emen

t

Plea

se N

ote:

Thi

s m

ap d

epic

ts n

on-c

omm

itted

, non

-fund

ed, c

once

ptua

l reg

iona

l tra

nspo

rtatio

nin

frast

ruct

ure

need

s id

entif

ied

by th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

. Th

ese

need

s ar

e di

spla

yed

as p

lace

hold

ers

for g

raph

ic re

pres

enta

tion.

Use

of t

his

map

sho

uld

be li

mite

d to

pre

limin

ary

plan

ning

pur

pose

son

ly. A

dditi

onal

pla

nnin

g, e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tudy

, and

cos

t-ben

efit

anal

ysis

is n

eede

d to

iden

tify

optim

um a

ltern

ativ

es, a

ctua

l cor

ridor

alig

nmen

ts, a

nd s

yste

m im

pact

to s

uppo

rt fu

rther

dec

isio

nm

akin

g. A

lso

note

, the

dat

a us

ed to

cre

ate

this

map

are

from

the

best

kno

wn

sour

ce a

t the

time

and

is s

ubje

ct to

cha

nge.

Cen

tral R

egio

n ; W

ayne

Cou

nty

Iden

tifie

d En

hanc

emen

tC

ateg

orie

s fo

r Loc

al a

ndSt

ate

Faci

litie

s

Mul

ti-M

odal

Enha

ncem

ents

oAi

rpor

t Im

prov

emen

ts

!ÎPo

rt Im

prov

emen

ts

Ope

ratio

nal I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Inte

rsec

tion

impr

ovem

ents

,ne

w in

terc

hang

e,in

terc

hang

e m

odifi

catio

n,an

d sp

ot im

prov

emen

ts)

!St

ate

Faci

lity

!Lo

cal F

acili

ty

¹º»¼R

ail C

ross

ing

Impr

ovem

ent

Mob

ility

Impr

ovem

ents

(Add

ed tr

avel

lane

s,fr

eew

ay u

pgra

de)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

y

New

Ter

rain

, Sta

teFa

cilit

yLo

cal F

acili

tyN

ew T

erra

in, L

ocal

Faci

lity

New

Rai

l Cap

acity

(new

rail

line

or a

dded

capa

city

)

Stat

e Fa

cilit

ies

are

US,

Sta

teR

oute

, or U

S H

ighw

ay fu

nded

w

ith s

tate

and

fede

ral f

unds

.

Loca

l Fac

ilitie

s ar

e no

n-st

ate

jurs

idic

tion

faci

litie

s th

at c

anus

e st

ate

or lo

cal f

unds

.

Oth

er F

acili

ties

Non

-Inte

rsta

te

Inte

rsta

te

Exis

ting

Rai

l

Nav

igab

le S

tream

s

Cor

p. L

imits

68

TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING PUBLIC POLICY GOALS

◆◆ Air Pilot Duty Time (Federal)

◆◆ Reduce the “First Officer Qualification” (FOQ) Rule or 1,500 Hour Rule without compromising flight safety through Federal legislation or regulation

◆◆ Boat Captain Regulations (Federal)

◆◆ Reduce the U.S. Coast Guard boat pilot time requirements without compromising maritime safety from the current 5 years though Federal legislation or regulation

◆◆ Truck Driver Hours of Service (Federal)

◆◆ Increase the driver hours of service with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrations regulation without compromising highway safety through Federal legislation or regulation

◆◆ Incident Management Coordination (State)

◆◆ Pass State legislation that ensures State and county incident management ownership by an agency ensuring smooth traffic flow

◆◆ Intermodal Heavy Truck Corridors (State)

◆◆ Pass State legislation or revise State regulation to allow for 25 mile radius special intermodal zones

◆◆ Setback Policies and Stoplight Policies (State)

◆◆ Pass State legislation to create a setback and traffic light policy on high trafficked Federal Interstate and State highways in Indiana

◆◆ Truck Parking Study (State)

◆◆ Pass State legislation to study parking locations for trucks at certain locations along major Interstates/highways – I-80/94; I-80/90; I-69; I-65; I-70; I-74; US 31; I-64

◆◆ Truck Weight Limits (State)

◆◆ Pass State legislation to equalize State and county truck weight limits

69

TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING PUBLIC AWARENESS GOALS

◆◆ “Did You Know Stories” in the Central Region to educate the public on the importance of logistics industry to the Central Region and therefore the need for world-class logistics infrastructure

◆◆ Newspaper/Magazine online opinion pieces in the Central Region to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry

◆◆ Editorial boards in the Central Region to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry

◆◆ CRLC Strategic Plan launch press conferences; editorial boards; newspaper/online opinion pieces to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry to the Central Region

◆◆ TV/Radio interviews to educate the public on the importance of the logistics industry to the Central Region

TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

◆◆ Develop a plan to address the logistics shortages for air cargo pilots; truck drivers; and warehouse/logistics maintenance technicians in the Central Region

◆◆ Support the concept of implementing a statewide CDL+ Program

◆◆ Support and expand the Conexus Indiana A+ Partners Program

◆◆ Support and expand the Conexus Indiana HIRE Technology curriculum into high schools to develop job skills in logistics and operations for the Central Region

◆◆ Develop a plan to address the lack of logistics certifications, 2-year and 4-year degree programs in the Central Region

◆◆ Act as a facilitator for logistics companies to work more closely with universities offering logistics programs

70

LOGISTICS MARKET ANALYSIS

TRANSPORTATION MODE SWOT ANALYSISStrengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) for Indiana’s Central Regional Logistics Sector

INFRASTRUCTURE SWOT

STRENGTHS:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Strong network of air facilities

◆◆ Existing excess air capacity

◆◆ 1 of top 125 U.S. cargo airports: Indianapolis International Airport #5

◆◆ #2 FedEx hub at Indianapolis International Airport

◆◆ 1 airport with 11,900 feet or more of runway: Indianapolis International Airport

◆◆ Total of 23 Central Regional Airports: Anderson Municipal-Darlington Field Airport; Clinton Airport; Crawfordsville Municipal Airport; Delaware County-Johnson Field Airport; Eagle Creek Airport; Frankfort Municipal Airport; Glendale Airport; Greenwood Municipal Airport; Indianapolis Executive Airport; Indianapolis Metropolitan Airport; Indianapolis Regional Airport; Kokomo Municipal Airport; Mettel Field Airport; Reese Airport; New Castle-Henry County Municipal Airport; Noblesville Airport; Pope Field Airport; Purdue University Airport; Putnam County Airport; Randolph County Airport; Richmond Municipal Airport; Shelbyville Municipal Airport; and Sheridan Airport

◆◆ Midwest location

◆◆ Strategic geographic coverage of aviation facilities located around the Central Region

71

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Heavy presence of Class I railroads: CSX and Norfolk Southern

◆◆ 12 Class II & Class III freight railroads: C&NC Railroad; Central Indiana and Western Railroad; Central Railroad of Indianapolis; Honey Creek Railroad; Indian Creek Railroad; Indiana Eastern Railroad; Indiana Rail Road; Indiana Southern Railroad; Kankekee, Beaverville, and Southern Railroad; Louisville and Indiana Railroad; Winamac Southern Railroad; and Vermillion Valley Railroad

◆◆ Direct intermodal access from West Coast bypassing Chicago via The Indiana Rail Road Company and CN into the Senate Avenue terminal in Indianapolis

◆◆ Trucking (Roads):

◆◆ 6 major Interstates and 10 major highways: I-65, I-69; I-70, I-74, I-465, I-865, US 27, US 31, US 35, US 36, US 40, US 41, US 52, US 136, US 231, US 421

◆◆ Reputation as “Crossroads of America”

◆◆ 80 percent of the U.S. population within a day’s drive of Indiana

◆◆ Strong Midwest location: borders Illinois & Ohio

◆◆ Waterborne:

◆◆ Proximity to three public ports: Ports of Indiana – Burns Harbor, Jeffersonville and Mount Vernon

◆◆ Access to major U.S. inland waterways – Great Lakes, Ohio and Mississippi rivers

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Leader in exports/imports of important commodities (coal, iron/steel products, grain, food products, scrap metal, etc.)

◆◆ Warehouse availability

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Central Region airports have minimal international business; other than the domestic cargo shipping at Indianapolis International Airport

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Primarily pass through region for intermodal rail

◆◆ Lack of high volume intermodal facilities

◆◆ Bottlenecks due to rail congestion in Chicago

72


◆◆ Bottlenecks or traffic congestion at major points of interchange

◆◆ Lack of adequate capacity on Central Region’s Interstate highways

◆◆ Lack of designated heavy haul routes

◆◆ Lack of truck parking

◆◆ Waterborne:

◆◆ Not applicable

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Warehouse availability volatility

OPPORTUNITIES:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Position the Central Region as a reliever airport for domestic/international air cargo by utilizing excess capacity

◆◆ Create a strategy to better utilize the Central Region’s airports

◆◆ Utilize runways and facilities at several airports to accommodate air shipping opportunities

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Freight tonnage will nearly double by 2035, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)

◆◆ Seek opportunity to position Indiana as an East/West Corridor for Class I railroads to bypass Chicago bottleneck


◆◆ Freight tonnage will nearly double by 2035, according to USDOT

◆◆ Relieve bottlenecks around Central Region

◆◆ Upgrade Central Region strategic bridges

◆◆ Build dedicated truck lanes on selected corridors that separate trucks from passenger cars on major Interstates

◆◆ Align truck weight limits comparable with surrounding states

◆◆ Create designated heavy haul routes and align with surrounding states

73

◆◆ Waterborne:


◆◆ General:

◆◆ The value of U.S. imports and exports is expected to be equivalent to 60 percent of GDP by 2030

◆◆ Work for diversification of exports/imports

THREATS:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Continued underutilization of Central Region airports

◆◆ Lack of Federal, State, and local funding to meet infrastructure needs

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Continuation of the Central Region as a pass through area for rail

◆◆ Lack of investment in infrastructure by Class I railroads

◆◆ Adjacent states direct investment in rail

◆◆ Lack of private rail investment by private sector in Class II & III railroads


◆◆ Lack of funding to build roads to relieve bottle necks or traffic congestion

◆◆ Lack of funding to upgrade Central Region strategic bridges that are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete

◆◆ Waterborne:


◆◆ General:

◆◆ Lack of diversification of exports/imports

◆◆ Lack of funding for all infrastructure modes

◆◆ Impact of Federal Government energy policy on all modes of transportation

◆◆ Loss of competitive advantage in energy costs due to Federal regulations

74

PUBLIC POLICY SWOT

STRENGTHS:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Federal government reimburses up to 90% of costs for qualified airport projects

◆◆ Local funding of all Central Region airports

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Local rail investment

◆◆ Industrial Service Fund


◆◆ P3 funding for Indiana highways and roads

◆◆ State of Indiana focus on road construction

◆◆ Waterborne:


◆◆ General:

◆◆ Indiana’s use of public/private partnerships to facilitate the funding of key projects in the Central Region

◆◆ Transportation and Logistics Tax Credit

◆◆ Tax abatement for vacant buildings

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Lack of awareness by public entities on air freight movement

◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding for the Central Region

◆◆ Pilot shortages

◆◆ Airline pilot duty and entry level requirements for flight time

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Lack of private rail investment compared to surrounding states

◆◆ Lack of awareness by public entities on rail freight movement

◆◆ Lack of Federal/State funding

◆◆ Railroad employee hours of service requirements

75


◆◆ Federal/State use of gas taxes for other general Federal/State revenue needs

◆◆ Lower truck weight limits compared to Illinois and Ohio

◆◆ Inefficiencies in collection of fuel taxes

◆◆ Changes to Hours of Service regulations

◆◆ Truck driver shortages

◆◆ Waterborne:


◆◆ General:

◆◆ Increase in unemployment insurance (UI) tax on State level

OPPORTUNITIES:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Dedicated state aviation fund creating more Federal funding opportunity for aviation projects

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Federal and State investment tax credit incentivizing private rail investment

◆◆ Funding for inter/multimodal rail development


◆◆ Federal and State firewall on gas taxes for highway use only

◆◆ Dedicated truck lanes on major Interstates

◆◆ Allow increase of truck weight limits at Illinois and Ohio borders

◆◆ Use of State sales tax on surface transportation fuels

◆◆ New innovative funding mechanisms for roads

◆◆ Waterborne:


◆◆ General:

◆◆ Lower UI tax on State level

◆◆ Lower capital gains tax on Federal level

◆◆ Reduction of personal property tax

76

THREATS:

◆◆ Air:

◆◆ Loss of matching dollars from Federal Government because of lack of State investment

◆◆ Rail:

◆◆ Surrounding states of Illinois and Ohio offer grants/loans/tax credits for rail economic development/private investment


◆◆ Surrounding states of Illinois and Ohio offer grants/loans/tax credits for trucking economic development/private investment

◆◆ Lack of Federal/State highway dollars for new/existing roads

◆◆ Continued use of gas taxes for other general Federal/State revenue needs

◆◆ Competitiveness issues due to higher truck weight limits in Illinois

◆◆ Continued inefficient collection of fuel taxes

◆◆ Waterborne:


◆◆ Warehousing/Distribution:

◆◆ Surrounding state of Ohio offers grants/loans/tax credits for warehousing/real estate economic development/private investment

◆◆ Further State tax increases for UI

◆◆ Current use of vacant warehouse/distribution facilities

◆◆ General:

◆◆ Lack of policy action leading to loss of private investment

◆◆ Lack of a State fund for unexpected economic development infrastructure needs

◆◆ Continued lack of growth in national economy

77

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SWOT

STRENGTHS:

◆◆ Public/private postsecondary institutions with ability to reach mass of workers

◆◆ Entrepreneurs creating online curriculum programs

◆◆ State government officials who understand importance of up-skilling Hoosier workers

◆◆ Growth of logistics firms in the Central Region

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Lack of skilled workers

◆◆ Public misconception of logistics and warehouse careers

◆◆ Assorted logistics education curriculum not meeting industry needs

◆◆ Air cargo pilot, truck driver, and boat captain shortages

◆◆ Warehouse/Logistics maintenance technician shortages

◆◆ 4-year logistics degree supervisor shortages

◆◆ Lack of fork lift certifications

OPPORTUNITIES:

◆◆ Identify logistics job skills gap areas

◆◆ Curriculum development with postsecondary education to meet job skills gap areas

◆◆ Create online program to up-skill Indiana logistics worker from places of employment

◆◆ Continued growth of logistics jobs in the Central Region

THREATS:

◆◆ Loss of logistics economic development due to workforce gaps

◆◆ Continued perception of logistics industry as undesirable work

◆◆ Lower skill workers remaining in lower level positions

◆◆ Lack of 4-year degree student interest in logistics careers

◆◆ Lack of air cargo pilots, truck drivers, and boat captains

◆◆ Lack of warehouse logistics maintenance technicians

◆◆ Lack of 4-year logistics supervisors

78

PUBLIC AWARENESS SWOT

STRENGTHS:

◆◆ Positive visibility of trucking

◆◆ Viewed as a center for surrounding major cities

WEAKNESSES:

◆◆ Lack of public understanding of logistics

◆◆ Lack of public understanding of need for infrastructure expansion/improvement

◆◆ Public misperception of logistics jobs

◆◆ Public misperception of global trade & positive impact on the Central Region

◆◆ Lack of awareness of importance for air, rail & water transportation modes

OPPORTUNITIES:

◆◆ Educate public on positive impacts of logistics industry

◆◆ Explain the facts on how the logistics industry impacts everyday life

◆◆ Educate public on need for infrastructure expansion/improvement

◆◆ Educate public on high-skill, high-wage jobs in logistics

◆◆ Educate public on positive impacts of global trade

◆◆ Increase understanding of importance for air, rail & water transportation modes

◆◆ Educate public on the effects and importance of waterborne transportation on Central Indiana

THREATS:

◆◆ Continued public misperception of the importance of the logistics industry

◆◆ Lack of awareness of need for infrastructure expansion/improvement

◆◆ Continued public misperception of logistics jobs

◆◆ Continued public belief of negative impacts of global trade

79

CENTRAL REGION INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

◆◆ Air

◆◆ 23 Central Region Airports

◆◆ #2 FedEx Hub in the World at Indianapolis International Airport

◆◆ Indianapolis International Airport #23 Busiest Airport by Cargo Traffic

◆◆ Rail

◆◆ 2 Class I Railroads

◆◆ 12 Class II & III Railroads

◆◆ Trucking:

◆◆ 6 Major Interstates and 10 Major Highways

◆◆ Waterborne

◆◆ Proximity to 3 Public Ports

FOR MORE INFORMATION

CONTACT:

DAVID W. HOLT Vice President Operations & Business Development

Conexus Indiana111 Monument Circle

Suite 1800Indianapolis, IN 46204

Phone: (317)638-2108email: [email protected]

www.conexusindiana.com

Brought to you in part by

111 Monument Circle, Suite 1800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 317-638-2108

www.conexusindiana.com

central regional logistics council … the crossroads: driving central indiana’s logistics ......

Documents