cee 320 fall 2008 horizontal alignment. cee 320 fall 2008 horizontal alignment objective:...

30
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment

Upload: daniela-cole

Post on 16-Jan-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Horizontal Alignment

Page 2: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Horizontal Alignment

• Objective: – Geometry of directional transition to ensure:

• Safety• Comfort

• Primary challenge– Transition between two directions

• Fundamentals– Circular curves– Superelevation or banking

Δ

Page 3: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Vehicle Cornering

cpfp FFW

Fcp

Fcn

Wp

Wn F f

F f

Fc

W

Centripetal force parallel to the roadway

Side frictional force

Weight parallel to the roadway

Page 4: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Vehicle Cornering cpfp FFW

α

α

Fcp

Fcn

Wp

Wn F f

F f

α

Fc

W

Vehicle weight and centripetal force normal to roadway

Page 5: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Vehicle Cornering cpfp FFW

cossincossin22

vvs gR

WV

gR

WVWfW

α

α

Fcp

Fcn

Wp

Wn F f

F f

α

Fc

W

≈Rv

Page 6: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Horizontal Curve Fundamentals

R

PC PT

PI

R

L

Curve is a circle, not a parabola

Page 7: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Superelevation

• Banking• number of vertical feet of rise per 100 ft of

horizontal distance • e = 100tan

α

Page 8: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Superelevation

cossincossin22

vvs gR

WV

gR

WVWfW

tan1tan2

sv

s fgR

Vf

1001

100

2 ef

gR

Vf

es

vs

100

2

efg

VR

s

v

Divide both sides by Wcos(α)

Page 9: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Superelevation

• Minimum radius that provides for safe vehicle operation

• Given vehicle speed, coefficient of side friction, gravity, and superelevation

• Rv because it is to the vehicle’s path (as opposed to edge of roadway)

100

2

efg

VR

s

v

Page 10: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Selection of e and fs

• Practical limits on superelevation (e)– Climate– Constructability– Adjacent land use

• Side friction factor (fs) variations– Vehicle speed– Pavement texture– Tire condition– Maximum side friction factor is the point at which tires

begin to skid.– Design values are chosen below maximum.

Page 11: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Minimum Radius Tables

Page 12: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

WSDOT Design Side Friction Factors

from

the

200

5 W

SD

OT

Des

ign

Man

ual,

M 2

2-01

For Open Highways and Ramps

Page 13: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Design Superelevation Rates - AASHTO

from AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2004

Page 14: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Design Superelevation Rates - WSDOT

from the 2005 WSDOT Design Manual, M 22-01

emax = 8%

Page 15: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Example 5

A section of SR 522 is being designed as a high-speed divided highway. The design speed is 70 mph. Using WSDOT standards, what is the minimum curve radius (as measured to the traveled vehicle path) for safe vehicle operation?

Page 16: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Example 5

A section of SR 522 is being designed as a high-speed divided highway. The design speed is 70 mph. Using WSDOT standards, what is the minimum curve radius (as measured to the traveled vehicle path) for safe vehicle operation?

For the minimum curve radius we want the maximum superelevation.WSDOT max e = 0.10

For 70 mph, WSDOT f = 0.10

ftefg

VR

sv 1644

2

Page 17: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Horizontal Curve Fundamentals

R

T

PC PT

PI

M

E

R

Δ

Δ/2Δ/2

Δ/2L

Page 18: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Horizontal Curve Fundamentals

R

T

PC PT

PI

M

E

R

Δ

Δ/2Δ/2

Δ/2L

Degree of curvature:

Angle subtended by a 100 foot arc along the horizontal curve

A function of circle radius

Larger D with smaller R

Expressed in degrees

RRD

000,18

180100

Page 19: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Horizontal Curve Fundamentals

R

T

PC PT

PI

M

E

R

Δ

Δ/2Δ/2

Δ/2

2tan

RT

DRL

100

180

L

Tangent length (ft)

Length of curve (ft)

Page 20: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Horizontal Curve Fundamentals

1

2cos

1RE

2

cos1RM

R

T

PC PT

PI

M

E

R

Δ

Δ/2Δ/2

Δ/2L

External distance (ft)

Middle ordinate (ft)

Page 21: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Example 4

A horizontal curve is designed with a 1500 ft. radius. The tangent length is 400 ft. and the PT station is 20+00. What is the PC station?

T = Rtan(delta/2). Delta = 29.86 degrees

D = 5729.6/R, D = 3.82 degrees

L = 100(delta)/D = 100(29.86)/3.82 = 781 ft.

PC = PT – L = 2000 – 781 = 1219 = 12+19

Page 22: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Stopping Sight Distance

Rv

Δs

Obstruction

Ms

DRSSD s

sv

100

180

SSD (not L)•Looking around a curve•Measured along horizontal curve from the center of the traveled lane•Need to clear back to Ms (the middle of a line that has same arc length as SSD)

Assumes curve exceeds required SSD

Page 23: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Stopping Sight Distance

Rv

Δs

Obstruction

Ms v

s R

SSD

180

SSD (not L)

vvs R

SSDRM

90

cos1

v

svv

R

MRRSSD 1cos

90

Page 24: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Example 6

SSD=566 ft (table 3.1)

Ms=20.01 ft

rtV

Gga

g

VSSD 1

21

2

A horizontal curve with a radius to the vehicle’s path of 2000 ft and a 60 mph design speed. Determine the distance that must be cleared from the inside edge of the inside lane to provide sufficient stopping sight distance.

vvs R

SSDRM

90

cos1

degrees

Page 25: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Superelevation Transition

from the 2001 Caltrans Highway Design Manual

Page 26: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Spiral Curves

No Spiral

Spiral

from AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2004

Page 27: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Spiral Curves

• Ease driver into the curve• Think of how the steering wheel works, it’s

a change from zero angle to the angle of the turn in a finite amount of time

• This can result in lane wander• Often make lanes bigger in turns to

accommodate for this

Page 28: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

No Spiral

Page 29: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Spiral Curves

• WSDOT no longer uses spiral curves• Involve complex geometry• Require more surveying• If used, superelevation transition should

occur entirely within spiral

Page 30: CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Horizontal Alignment Objective: –Geometry of directional transition to ensure: Safety Comfort

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Operating vs. Design Speed

85th Percentile Speed vs. Inferred Design Speed for 138 Rural Two-Lane Highway Horizontal Curves

85th Percentile Speed vs. Inferred Design Speed for

Rural Two-Lane Highway Limited Sight Distance Crest

Vertical Curves