cdp 2014 water 2014 information request cdp celgene … · 2019-06-11 · cdp cdp 2014 water 2014...

CDP CDP 2014 Water 2014 Information Request Celgene Corporation

Module: Introduction

Page: W0. Introduction

W0.1

Introduction Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Celgene is a multinational biopharmaceutical company committed to improving the lives of patients worldwide. At Celgene, we seek to deliver truly innovative and life-changing therapies for our patients, our healthcare system, our society and our economy. Our mission as a company is to build a major global biopharmaceutical corporation while focusing on the discovery, the development, and the commercialization disease-altering medical innovation that may help patients live longer lives, to reduce the burden on healthcare and grow our economy. There are more than 300 clinical trials at major medical centers using compounds from Celgene. Investigational compounds are being studied for patients with incurable hematological and solid tumor cancers, including multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic lymphocyte leukemia (CLL), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), myelofibrosis, small cell lung cancer and prostate cancer as well as immunological diseases such as psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and Bechet’s disease. As committed as we are to clinical accomplishment, we are equally committed to patient support, which is a guiding principle at Celgene. We believe all who can benefit from our discoveries should have the opportunity to do so. Celgene puts patients first with industry-leading programs that provide information, for patient support and, to the maximum extent possible, safe access to our innovative therapies.

W0.2

Reporting Year Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data.

Period for which data is reported

Tue 01 Jan 2013 - Tue 31 Dec 2013

W0.3

Reporting Boundary Please indicate the category that describes the reporting boundary for companies, entities, or groups for which water-related impacts are reported. Companies, entities or groups in which an equity share is held

W0.4

Exclusions Are there any geographies, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? Yes

W0.4a

List of Exclusions Please report the exclusions in the following table

Exclusion

Please explain why you have made the exclusion

Zofingen, Switzerland

Celgene has “purchased” dedicated floor space for manufacturing within a larger facility; however, Celgene cannot sell this space to a third party, and all building utilities are common with that of the owner of the building; as a result, this space has been excluded from the inventory boundary

Melrose Park, IL, USA

This facility was considered within Celgene’s organizational boundary, but were not included in the GHG inventory because there were limited data available and the future operation of the facilities was unknown at the time of acquisition

Further Information

Module: Current State

Page: W1. Context

W1.1

Please rate the importance (current and future) of water quality and water quantity to the success of your organization

Water quality and quantity

Importance rating

Please explain

Direct use: sufficient amounts of good quality freshwater available for use across your own operations Vital for operations Our company requires high-quality water and a large quantity every

year in the multitude of operations in our facilities Direct use: sufficient amounts of recycled, brackish and/or produced water available for use across your own operations Vital for operations Recycled water is not used in large quantities at our facilities

Indirect use: sufficient amounts of good quality freshwater available for use across your value chain Have not evaluated We have not yet evaluated the quality and quantity of water that is

consumed or utilized across our value chain. Indirect use: sufficient amounts of recycled, brackish and/or produced water available for use across your value chain Have not evaluated We have not yet evaluated the quality and quantity of water that is

consumed or utilized across our value chain.

W1.2

Have you evaluated how water quality and water quantity affects /could affect the success (viability, constraints) of your organization's growth strategy? Not evaluated

W1.2a

Please explain how your organization evaluated the effects of water quality and water quantity on the success (viability, constraints) of your organization's growth strategy?

W1.2b

What is the main reason for not having evaluated how water quality and water quantity affects /could affect the success (viability, constraints) of your organization's growth strategy, and are there any plans in place to do so in the future?

Main reason

Current plans

Timeframe

until evaluation

Comment

Other: Impact of Expansions No Other: 3-5

years

Celgene has not performed a thorough evaluation of how water quality and quantity could affect the growth of the company to date. This has not occurred due to our expansions occurring in geographical areas where water scarcity has not been shown to be a serious business-related risk. Any growth of the company, in particular expansion/additions of facilities, do include water risk analysis and purchasing strategies to ensure both quality and quantity needs are met to the best possible standard.

W1.3

Has your organization experienced any detrimental impacts related to water in the reporting period?

No

W1.3a

Please describe the detrimental impacts experienced by your organization related to water in the reporting period

Country

River basin

Impact indicator

Impact

Description of

impact

Overall

financial impact

Response strategy

Description of

response strategy

W1.3b

Please choose the option below that best explains why you do not know if your organization experienced any detrimental impacts related to water in the reporting period and any plans you have to investigate this in the future

Primary reason

Future plans

Further Information

Module: Risk Assessment

Page: W2. Procedures and Requirements

W2.1

Please select the option that best describes your procedures with regard to assessing water risks and provide an explanation as to why this option is suitable for your organization Water risk assessments undertaken independently of other risk assessments across some direct operations

W2.1a

You may provide additional information about your approach to assessing water risks here Assessment undertaken using the WBCSD Water Tool to determine stress and scarcity projections for 2025 (on the watershed level) were employed in our annual risk assessment for CDP Water submittal.

W2.2

Please state how frequently you undertake water risk assessments, what geographical scale and how far into the future you consider

Frequency

Geographic scale

Timeframe

Annual Region The timeframe for water risk assessments occurs on an annual basis during the formation of the CDP Water submittal. Other water-related risk assessments may occur during the year on a variable schedule depending upon the facility projects and operations.

W2.3

Please state the methods used to assess water risks

Method

WBCSD Global Water Tool

W2.4

Which of the following contextual issues are always factored into your organization's water risk assessments?

Issues

Choose option

Please explain

Current water availability and quality parameters at a local level Relevant, included Water availability and scarcity values are included in the WBCSD Global Water Tool

analysis and results for our facilities Current water regulatory frameworks and tariffs at a local level

Not relevant, explanation provided

Water regulatory frameworks are not included in the WBCSD Global Water Tool analysis and results for our facilities

Current stakeholder conflicts concerning water resources at a local level


Stakeholder conflicts are not included in the WBCSD Global Water Tool analysis and results for our facilities

Current implications of water on your key commodities/raw materials

Relevant, included for some facilities/suppliers

High quality potable water is essential for our business operations. The actual risk assessment using the WBCSD Global Water Tool does not include this aspect directly, but does show the impact from water resources on our facilities that are directly involved or manufacture our products.

Current status of ecosystems and habitats at a local level Relevant, included Status of ecosystems and watersheds is included in the WBCSD Global Water Tool

analysis and results for our facilities Estimates of future changes in water availability at a local level

Relevant, not yet included

Estimates for future water availability are not included in the WBCSD Global Water Tool analysis and results for our facilities

Estimates of future potential regulatory changes at a local level


Estimates for potential future regulatory frameworks are not included in the WBCSD Global Water Tool analysis and results for our facilities

Estimates of future potential stakeholder conflicts at a local level


Estimates of future stakeholder conflicts are not included in the WBCSD Global Water Tool analysis and results for our facilities

Estimates of future implications of water on your key commodities/raw materials


The actual risk assessment using the WBCSD Global Water Tool does not include future estimates for water.

Issues

Choose option

Please explain

Estimates of future potential changes in the status of ecosystems and habitats at a local level


Status of ecosystems and watersheds is included in the WBCSD Global Water Tool analysis and results for our facilities

Scenario analysis of availability of sufficient quantity and quality of water relevant for your operations at a local level


No scenario analysis for water availability or quality is performed using any internal analysis or the WBCSD Global Water Tool

Scenario analysis of regulatory and/or tariff changes at a local level


No scenario analysis for regulatory or tariff changes that deal with water is performed using any internal analysis or the WBCSD Global Water Tool

Scenario analysis of stakeholder conflicts concerning water resources at a local level


No scenario analysis for stakeholder conflict is performed using any internal analysis or the WBCSD Global Water Tool

Scenario analysis of implications of water on your key commodities/raw materials


No scenario analysis for water availability or quality and impact on our products or manufacturing operations is performed using any internal analysis or the WBCSD Global Water Tool

Scenario analysis of potential changes in the status of ecosystems and habitats at a local level


No scenario analysis for changes in ecosystems is performed using any internal analysis or the WBCSD Global Water Tool

Other Not evaluated

W2.4a

Which of the following stakeholders are always factored into your organization's water risk assessments?

Stakeholder

Choose option

Please explain

Customers Relevant, not yet included

The water risks we have assessed does influence our operations and ability to produce our therapies for our customers, but there is no direct relationship between our water performance and risks and influence from our customers. Future water risk assessments could tie in the ability of our facilities to produce our therapies.

Employees Relevant, included

Employee use and consumption water at facilities directly impacts the company’s withdrawal quantities. These quantities are included in the risk assessment using the WBCSD Global Water Tool

Stakeholder

Choose option

Please explain

Investors Relevant, not yet included

The current water risk assessment does not include financial impacts on our business or our investors that have supported our business. Future water risk assessments could tie in how much influence water has on our business and financial performance.

Local communities Relevant, included

The risk assessment tool includes impacts on local water sources, and this can easily translate to potential impacts on local communities where Celgene has operations.

NGOs Not evaluated There are no identified NGOs that are factored into water risks assessments Other water users at a local level Not evaluated There are no identified local-level water consumers that are factored into our water risks assessments

Regulators at a local level Not evaluated There are no identified local-level water regulators that are factored into our water risks assessments Statutory special interest groups at a local level Not evaluated There are no identified local-level special interest groups that are factored into our water risks assessments

Suppliers Relevant, not yet included

Celgene does not yet have a supply chain program that requires suppliers to report on their water risks. Future supply chain plans may require suppliers, specifically those that supply resources that are used in our manufacturing process, to disclosure their water withdraw and discharge performance as well as their management and risk strategies.

Water utilities/suppliers at a local level


Water utilities are involved in our water risk assessment through the relative availability and quality of water that is provided to our facilities.

Other Not evaluated

W2.5

Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management? No

W2.5a

Please provide the proportion of key suppliers you require to report on their water use, risks and management and the proportion of your procurement spend this represents

Proportion of key suppliers %

Total procurement spend %

Rationale for this coverage

W2.5b

Please choose the option that best explains why you do not require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management

Primary reason

Please explain

Other: Lack of supply chain program

Celgene does not yet have a supply chain program that requires suppliers to report on their water performance, risks and management programs. Future supply chain plans may require suppliers, specifically those that supply resources that are used in our manufacturing process, to disclosure their water withdraw and discharge performance as well as their management strategies.

Further Information

Module: Implications

Page: W3. Water Risks

W3.1

Is your organization exposed to water risks, either current and/or future, that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure? Yes, direct operations only

W3.2

Please provide details as to how your organization defines substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure from water risk Potential substantive changes to Celgene’s business and operations from water risks (see complete list below) are related to those that can contribute to a change in our business operations and impact costs related to water resources (withdrawal and discharge) and meeting regulatory requirements. This can also include any change or risk in water availability or quality utilized at our facility for operational use or employee consumption.

W3.2a

Please complete the table below providing information as to the number of facilities in your direct operations exposed to water risks that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure. Please also provide either the proportion of cost of goods sold, global revenue or global production capacity that could be affected across your entire organization at the river basin level

Country

River basin

Number of facilities within the river

basin exposed to water risk

Reporting metric

Proportion of chosen metric that could be

affected within the river basin

W3.2b

Please list the inherent water risks that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure, the potential impact to your direct operations and the strategies to mitigate them

Country

River basin

Risk driver

Potential impact

Description of impact

Timeframe

Likelihood

Magnitude of

potential financial impact

Response strategy

Costs of response strategy

Details of

strategy and costs

United States of America

Other: GHAASBasin3725

Physical-Declining water quality

Higher operating costs

High quality potable water is essential to our business operations. Increased treatment costs for potable water as well as increased costs to meet more stringent wastewater regulations could have financial implications.

1-3 years Unknown Low



Physical-Increased water scarcity

Limits on availability of fresh water could have financial implications.

>6 years Probable Low Infrastructure investment Low

The primary response for an increase in expenses for water-related activities is investing in water-consuming efficiency projects and infrastructure. This would reduce the facility’s

Country

River basin

Risk driver

Potential impact


Timeframe

Likelihood

Magnitude of


Response strategy


Details of

strategy and costs

overall consumption quantity and, hence, reduce the associated expenses, including those for operating and maintenance of the equipment if it is more reliable than old pieces of equipment.



Regulatory-Regulatory uncertainty


Increased cost to meet newly implemented or more stringent regulations could have financial implications

>6 years Unknown Low-medium

Low-medium

Based upon the regulatory that may result from water-related issues and incidents, the company will investigate the regulations to determine the shortcomings for its water performance and avenues for increasing water conservation.

Country

River basin

Risk driver

Potential impact


Timeframe

Likelihood

Magnitude of


Response strategy


Details of

strategy and costs


Colorado (Ari)

Physical-Declining water quality


High quality potable water is essential to our business operations. Increased treatment costs for potable water as well as increased costs to meet more stringent wastewater regulations could have financial implications.

1-3 years Unknown Low


Colorado (Ari)

Physical-Increased water scarcity


Limits on availability of fresh water could have financial implications.

>6 years Probable Low Infrastructure investment

Low-medium

The primary response for our company to this is to conform to any new regulatory requirements that are created as a result of any new standards due to drought conditions. This could include

Country

River basin

Risk driver

Potential impact


Timeframe

Likelihood

Magnitude of


Response strategy


Details of

strategy and costs

curtailing excessive water consumption throughout the facility or installing new water-efficient infrastructure. Additional response strategies include greater due diligence for water monitoring and proper water-related infrastructure maintenance.



Physical-Drought


California had its driest year in recorded history in 2013. This could easily lead to constraints for water supply throughout the state and drive up costs associated

1-3 years Highly probable

Low-medium

Implement regulatory requirements

Low-medium

The primary response for an increase in expenses for water-related activities is investing in water-consuming efficiency projects and infrastructure. This would reduce the

Country

River basin

Risk driver

Potential impact


Timeframe

Likelihood

Magnitude of


Response strategy


Details of

strategy and costs

with water consumption.

facility’s overall consumption quantity and, hence, reduce the associated expenses, including those for operating and maintenance of the equipment if it is more reliable than old pieces of equipment.



Regulatory-Higher water prices


There is always a potential for the price of water to increase at our global facilities. This could be due to a number of reasons, including water scarcity or drought or a disruption within the

1-3 years Probable Low-medium

Infrastructure investment

Low-medium

The primary response for an increase in expenses for water-related activities is investing in water-consuming efficiency projects and infrastructure. This would reduce the facility’s overall consumption

Country

River basin

Risk driver

Potential impact


Timeframe

Likelihood

Magnitude of


Response strategy


Details of

strategy and costs

supply chain quantity and, hence, reduce the associated expenses, including those for operating and maintenance of the equipment if it is more reliable than old pieces of equipment.


Colorado (Ari)



There is always a potential for the price of water to increase at our global facilities. This could be due to a number of reasons, including water scarcity or drought or a disruption within the supply chain



Low-medium

The primary response for an increase in expenses for water-related activities is investing in water-consuming efficiency projects and infrastructure. This would reduce the facility’s overall consumption quantity and, hence, reduce the associated

Country

River basin

Risk driver

Potential impact


Timeframe

Likelihood

Magnitude of


Response strategy


Details of

strategy and costs

expenses, including those for operating and maintenance of the equipment if it is more reliable than old pieces of equipment.


Hudson






Low-medium

The primary response for an increase in expenses for water-related activities is investing in water-consuming efficiency projects and infrastructure. This would reduce the facility’s overall consumption quantity and, hence, reduce the associated expenses, including those for

Country

River basin

Risk driver

Potential impact


Timeframe

Likelihood

Magnitude of


Response strategy


Details of

strategy and costs

operating and maintenance of the equipment if it is more reliable than old pieces of equipment.

Switzerland Rhine






Low-medium

The primary response for an increase in expenses for water-related activities is investing in water-consuming efficiency projects and infrastructure. This would reduce the facility’s overall consumption quantity and, hence, reduce the associated expenses, including those for operating and maintenance of the

Country

River basin

Risk driver

Potential impact


Timeframe

Likelihood

Magnitude of


Response strategy


Details of

strategy and costs

equipment if it is more reliable than old pieces of equipment.

W3.2c

Please list the inherent risks that could generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure, the potential impact to your supply chain and the strategies to mitigate them

Country

River basin

Risk driver

Potential impact


Timeframe

Likelihood

Magnitude of


Response strategy


Details of strategy

and costs

W3.2d

Please choose the option that best explains why you do not consider your organization to be exposed to water risks in your direct operations that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure

Primary reason

Please explain

W3.2e

Please choose the option that best explains why you do not consider your organization to be exposed to water risks in your supply chain that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure

Primary reason

Please explain

Risks exist, but no substantive impact anticipated

Celgene recognizes that risks are inherit throughout the our supply chain. However, we have yet to pursue an analysis that shows were water risks exist and the magnitude of said risks on both the company as a whole and individual facilities.

W3.2f

Please choose the option that best explains why you do not know if your organization is exposed to water risks that could generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure and discuss any future plans you have to assess this

Primary reason

Future plans

Further Information

Page: W4. Water Opportunities

W4.1

Does water present strategic, operational or market opportunities that substantively benefit/have the potential to benefit your organization? Yes

W4.1a

Please describe the opportunities water presents to your organization and your strategies to realize them

Country or region

Opportunity

Strategy to realize opportunity

Estimated timeframe

Please explain


Improved water efficiency

The Summit, NJ facility further optimized the chilled water infrastructure that is used for cooling processes throughout the main building.

Current-up to 1 year



The Phoenix, AZ facility replaced the legacy water pre-treatment and RO/DI system.


This outdated system utilized old equipment and inefficient means to treat incoming city water and prepare it for use in our critical utility systems. As part of this project, a new Siemens DI water system was installed and validated. This new system utilizes a compact skid design and performs all of the same functions with less water waste and chemical treatment. Best of all, this system uses a recirculation feature that saves a significant amount of water when the unit is idle.



The Phoenix, AZ facility performed repair maintenance of leaking water supply lines and drips supplying facility trees, shrubs and grass




The new San Diego, CA facility installed low-flow faucets, fixtures, water closets and urinals.


Various strategies were implemented to attain LEED points for Water Use prerequisite and Water Use Reduction credits.

W4.1b

Please choose the option that best explains why water does not present your organization with any opportunities that have the potential to provide substantive benefit

Primary reason

Please explain

W4.1c

Please choose the option that best explains why you do not know if water presents your organization with any opportunities that have the potential to provide substantive benefit

Primary reason

Please explain

Further Information

Module: Accounting

Page: W5. Water Accounting (I)

W5.1

Please report the total withdrawal, discharge, consumption and recycled water volumes across your operations for the reporting period

Water use

Quantity (megaliters)

Total volume of water withdrawn 188.24 Total volume of water discharged 118.01 Total volume of water consumed 88.28 Total volume of recycled water used 0

W5.2

For those facilities exposed to water risks that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure, the number of which was reported in W3.2a, please detail which of the following water aspects are regularly measured and monitored and an explanation as to why or why not

Water aspect

% of facilities

Please explain

Water withdrawals- total volumes 51-75 Water withdrawal is not measured at several facilities because Celgene leases space from owners of the facilities and there is an absence of water meters for Celgene’s leased spaced.

Water withdrawals- volume by sources Water discharges- total volumes 26-50 Water discharge is not measured at four facilities due to absence of discharge metering systems.

Water discharges- volume by destination 26-50 Water discharge is not measured at four facilities due to absence of discharge metering systems, so the final discharge location and treatment method are assumed and not exactly known

Water discharges- volume by treatment method 26-50 Water discharge is not measured at four facilities due to absence of discharge metering systems, so

the final discharge location and treatment method are assumed and not exactly known Water discharge quality data- quality by standard effluent parameters Water consumption- total volume Water recycling/reuse-total volume

W5.3

Water withdrawals: for the reporting period, please complete the table below with water accounting data for all facilities included in your answer to W3.2a

Facility reference

number

Country

River basin

Facility name

Total water withdrawals

(megaliters/year) at this facility

How does the total

water withdrawals at this facility compare to the last reporting

period?

Please explain the change if substantial

Facility 1 United States of America Hudson Summit 32.64 Lower

Facility 2 United States of America Hudson Warren 2.94 Lower

Facility 3 United States of America Hudson Cedar Knolls 1.12 About the same

Facility 4 United States of America Colorado (Ari) Phoenix 109.1 Lower

Facility 5 United States of America

Other: GHAASBasin3725 San Diego 28.76 Higher

Facility 6 Switzerland Rhine Boudry 13.67 About the same

Further Information

Page: W5. Water Accounting (II)

W5.3a

Water withdrawals: for the reporting period, please provide withdrawal data, in megaliters per year, for the water sources used for all facilities reported in W5.3

Facility

reference number

Surface water

Groundwater (renewable)

Groundwater (non-

renewable)

Municipal water

Recycled water

Produced/process

water

Wastewater

Brackish/salt

water

Facility 1 0 0 0 32.67 0 0 0 0 Facility 2 0 0 0 2.94 0 0 0 0 Facility 3 0 0 0 1.12 0 0 0 0 Facility 4 0 0 0 109.1 0 0 0 0 Facility 5 0 0 0 28.76 0 0 0 0 Facility 6 0 0 .57 13.11 0 0 0 0

W5.4

Water discharge: for the reporting period, please provide the water accounting data for all facilities reported in W5.3

Facility

reference number

Total water discharged (megaliters/year) at this

facility

How does the total water discharged at this facility compare to the last reporting

period?

Please explain the change if substantive

Facility 1 50.69 Change unknown, the water discharge quantity for this facility was found to have problems associated its metering data and may be erroneous

Facility 2 2.1 Higher Facility 3 .8 About the same Facility 4 54.25 Higher Facility 5 5.44 About the same Facility 6 10 Higher

W5.4a

Water discharge: for the reporting period, please provide water discharge data, in megaliters per year, by destination for all facilities reported in W5.3

Facility

reference number

Surface water

Municipal Treatment

Plant

Saltwater

Injection for

production/disposal

Aquifer recharge

Storage/waste lagoon

Facility 1 0 50.69 0 0 0 0 Facility 2 0 2.1 0 0 0 0 Facility 3 0 .8 0 0 0 0 Facility 4 0 54.25 0 0 0 0 Facility 5 0 5.44 0 0 0 0 Facility 6 0 10 0 0 0 0

W5.5

Water consumption: for the reporting period, please provide water consumption data for all facilities reported in W5.3

Facility reference

number

Consumption

(megaliters/year)

How does this compare to the last reporting period?

Please explain the change if substantive

Facility 1 Change unknown, there were potential errors in the collection of the water discharge quantity that could generate errors in the water consumption quantity

Facility 2 .84 About the same Facility 3 .32 About the same Facility 4 54.86 Higher Facility 5 23.32 About the same Facility 6 3.67 Lower

W5.6

For the reporting period, please provide any available water intensity values for your organization's products or services across its operation

Country

River basin

Product name

Product unit

Water unit

Water

intensity (Water

unit/Product unit)

Water use type

Comment

W5.7

For all facilities reported in W3.2a what proportion of their accounting data has been externally verified?

Water aspect

% verification

What standard was used?

Water withdrawals- total volumes Not verified Water withdrawals- volume by sources Not verified Water discharges- total volumes Not verified Water discharges- volume by destination Not verified Water discharges- volume by treatment method Not verified Water discharge quality data- quality by standard effluent parameters Not verified Water consumption- total volume Not verified Water recycling/reuse-total volume Not verified

Further Information

Module: Response

Page: W6. Governance and Strategy

W6.1

Who has the highest level of direct responsibility for water within your organization and how frequently are they briefed?

Highest level of direct

responsibility for water issues

Frequency of briefings on water issues

Comment

Senior Manager/Officer Scheduled-annual

Richard Bagger, Senior Vice President of Global Corporate Affairs and Market Access, is one of the senior members of the Senior Executive Management Committee and reports directly to the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. This committee manages climate change and some water-related policy and strategy for Celgene worldwide.

W6.2

Is water management integrated into your business strategy? Yes

W6.2a

Please choose the option(s) below that best explain how water has positively influenced your business strategy

Influence of water on

business strategy

Please explain

Tighter operational performance standards

Influence concerning water performance has already led Celgene to adapt basic (also called “low-hanging fruit”) strategies and programs at existing facilities such as the projects highlighted in section 4.1. These general programs are being planned to transition to other global sites and facilities in order maintain or reduce Celgene’s global water consumption and impact.

W6.2b

Please choose the option(s) below that best explains how water has negatively influenced your business strategy

Influence of water on business strategy

Please explain

No measurable influence There have been no observed instances were water performance or related activities have contributed negatively to our business strategy or operations

W6.2c

Please choose the option that best explains why your organization does not integrate water management into its business strategy and discuss any future plans to do so

Primary reason

Please explain

W6.3

Does your organization have a water policy that sets out clear goals and guidelines for action? No

W6.4

How does your organization's water-related capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) during the most recent reporting period compare to the previous reporting period?

Water-related spending: % of total CAPEX during this

reporting period compared to last reporting period

Water-related spending: % of total OPEX during this reporting period compared to last reporting period

Motivation for these changes

Further Information

Page: W7. Compliance

W7.1

Was your organization subject to any penalties and/or fines for breaches of abstraction licenses, discharge consents or other water and wastewater related regulations in the reporting period? No

W7.1a

Please describe the penalties and/or fines for breaches of abstraction licenses, discharge consents or other water and wastewater related regulations and your plans for resolving them

Facility name

Incident

description

Financial penalty

or fine

Currency

Incident

resolution

W7.1b

Please indicate the total of all penalties and/or fines for breaches of abstraction licenses, discharge consents or other water and wastewater related regulations as a percentage of total operating expenditure (OPEX) compared to last year

Further Information

Page: W8. Targets and Initiatives

W8.1

Do you have any company wide targets (quantitative) or goals (qualitative) related to water? No

W8.1a

Please complete the following table with information on company wide quantitative targets (ongoing or reached completion during the reporting period) and an indication of progress made

Category of target

Motivation

Description

of target

Quantitative unit of

measurement

Base-line year

Target year

Proportion of target achieved, % value

W8.1b

Please describe any company wide qualitative goals (ongoing or reached completion during the reporting period) and your progress in achieving these

Goal

Motivation

Description of goal

Progress

W8.1c

Please explain why you do not have any water-related targets or goals and discuss any plans to develop these in the future There are no water-related targets or goals for the company because of Celgene’s expected continuous growth of the next coming years. Determining and setting an absolute or intensity target (or targets) could present a misrepresentation of the growth and performance of the company over the next 5-10 years. It is anticipated that water withdrawal and discharge levels will continue toward stabilization or improved reductions.

Further Information

Module: Sign Off

Page: Sign Off

W9.1

Please provide the following information for the person that has signed off (approved) your CDP water response

Name

Job title

Corresponding job category

Douglas MacGorman Senior Director of Engineering, Construction and Carbon Management Environment/Sustainability manager

Further Information

CDP 2014 Water 2014 Information Request

cdp 2014 water 2014 information request cdp celgene … · 2019-06-11 · cdp cdp 2014 water 2014...

Documents