cat. 6a ≠ cat. 6 a ≠ class ea

Download Cat. 6A ≠ Cat. 6 A ≠ Class EA

Post on 08-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 Cat. 6A Cat. 6 A Class EA

    1/1

    4/26/11 10:14 PMCat. 6A Cat. 6 A Class EA

    Page 1 of 1http://www.ampnetconnect.by/web/Microsites/ISO_Cat6a/6a_Facts/ClassEa_vs_Cat6a/

    Cat. 6A Cat. 6 A Class EA

    In the market today there are a lot of different definitions and interpretations of Cat. 6A. It is commonly

    understood that Cat. 6A has already been fully specified for quite a while. This is not the case, especially when

    one looks to the global cabling standards ISO/IEC 11801 and not to the regional US cabling standard. There

    are 2 reasons for this:

    1. Naming Confusion

    The regional US American cabling standard EIA/TIA 568-B.2 Add. 10 describes all configurations (channels,

    links and components) as "Cat. 6A". This imprecise naming leads to the fact that it is impossible to be sure

    what people are talking about when they say: "Cat. 6A". This can be a channel or a permanent link or even

    the most stringent and most important definition, the component specification. This naming convention is

    different from the one that the international cabling standard ISO/IEC 11801 and the regional European

    cabling standard EN 50173-1 have chosen. In these standards configurations like channels and permanent

    links are called Class EA while only the most important component specification is called Cat. 6A.

    The following graphic illustrates the naming confusion:

    2. Performance Confusion

    Unfortunately, not only the names are different when you compare EIA/TIA with ISO/IEC or EN.

    The transmission performance requirements for channels and permanent links and components also show

    significant variations. The ISO/IEC specifications for all configurations are much more stringent compared to

    the ones from the regional US standard.

    Here is a technical comparison based on the PS NEXT parameter between ISO/IEC 11801 Amd. 1+2 and

    EIA/TIA 568-B.2 Add. 10:

    ISO/IEC EIA/TIAISO/IEC is more

    stringent by

    Channel PS NEXT @ 500 MHz in dB 24.8 23.2 1.6

    Permanent Link PS NEXT @ 500 MHz in dB 26.4 23.8 2.6

    Component Cat. 6A NEXT @ 500 MHz in dB 37.0 34.0 3.0

    3. Conclusion from the Confusion

    It is obvious, as shown above, that these different nomenclature and performance criteria make the selection

    process very difficult for end users. An EIA/TIA Cat. 6A channel ("weakest" specification) is called Cat. 6A as

    well as the ISO/IEC Cat. 6A component definition ("highest" definition). How can end users find their way in

    this standards jungle ?

    The answer is actually easy and, paradoxically, it comes from the standards themselves. Customers should

    follow either the cabling standard of their region or take the international standard ISO/IEC 11801 as a

    reference.

Recommended

View more >