can we alter mpn evolution with ifn therapy? · 2018-07-18 · can we alter mpn evolution with ifn...
TRANSCRIPT
Can we alter MPN evolution
with IFN therapy?
J.J. Kiladjian, MD, PhD,Clinical Investigation Center,
Saint-Louis Hospital and Paris Diderot University
Natural history of MPN
Current data of IFN in MPN
Clinical trials of pegylated IFNs in MPNs
• High rates of hematological response
• Good tolerance
• Molecular responses
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
020
4060
8010
0
Months
% V
617F
45%
22%
5% 3%
48%
21%
18 mos
Quintas Cardama et al, JCO, 2009Kiladjian et al, Blood, 2008 Them et al, Am J Hematol, 2015
M0 M12 M24 M36 M48 M60 M72
50%
100%
0
%V
617
F
PVN1 study – Long term Molecular response
%V617F M0 M12 M24 M36 M48 M60 M72
Median 45% 25% 5% 5% 10% 6% 5%
Range 10 - 100 0 - 60 0 - 50 0 - 40 0 - 40 0 - 45 0 - 45
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
%C
ALR
Months
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
%C
ALR
Months
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
%C
ALR
Months
IFNa Aspirin Hydroxyurea
b e fo r e a f te r
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
% C
AL
R
****
1 s t s a m p le 2 n d s a m p le
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
% C
AL
R
N S
b e fo r e a f te r
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
% C
AL
R
N S
CALR mutant allele burden evolution
IFN alpha – Histological response
Larsen et al., Ann Hem, 2008
Silver, Leukemia, 2009
IFN alpha – Histological response in PVN1
UPN 1
UPN 2
UPN 3
x10 x20 reticulin (x10)
IFN discontinuation and outcome
PVN1 study – peg-IFNα-2a discontinuation
• Causes of peg-IFNα-2a discontinuation
– 14 (38%) for hematol. CR
– 10 (27%) for toxicity
Fatigue (n= 2)
Depression (n= 1)
Auto-antibodies (n=2)
Thyroiditis (n= 1)
Arthralgia (n= 1)
Neutropenia (n= 1)
Neuropathy gr. 2 (n= 1)
LFTs elevation gr. 2 (n=1)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
No
of
pat
ien
ts
years
toxicity MF/AML Loss of Resp., NR others
MD Anderson - FU: 83 months
Impact of molecular response on clinical outcomes
Kiladjian et al., ASH 2016
• Single center study of outcome of MPN patients treated with IFN after discontinuation (whichever the cause)
• Endpoints (competing risk) :
• hematological relapse
• thrombosis
• hematological transformation
• EFS
• Predictive factors
Impact of molecular response on clinical outcomes
Kiladjian et al., ASH 2016
• Since 2000, 333 MPN patients received IFNa
• 149 stops
• 78 PV, 61 ET, 10 MF
• Reason for IFN start: age: 50 %, resistance / intoleranceprevious therapy: 27%, pregnancy n = 4
• Median Age 49.5 years
• Time between MPN diagnosis and IFN: 2 years
• 64 (43 %) had a history of thrombosis
Impact of molecular response on clinical outcomes
Kiladjian et al., ASH 2016
• 123 JAK2V617F+, 15 CALR, 5 MPL & 1 JAK2 exon 12, 5 triple-neg.
• 47 tested by NGS: 15 additional mutations
• IFN response : CHR in 123 (83%), PR in 16, failure in 10 pts
• Reasons for stopping:
• Toxicity : 79 (53%)
• Prolonged CHR: 52 (35%)
• Median time on IFN : 28.3 months
Impact of molecular response on clinical outcomes
Influence of JAK2V617 allele burden
on the predicted probability of
persistent complete hematological response
without cytoreductive therapy
JAK2 End IFN (%)
Prob
abilit
y of C
HR
0 20 40 60 80 100
00.2
0.40.6
0.81.0
Kiladjian et al., ASH 2016
Impact of molecular response on clinical outcomes
Kiladjian et al., ASH 2016
Months post IFN start
Eve
nt-
Fre
e s
urv
iva
l
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
149 142 126 93 59 32 18 4 2
Model HR (95%CI) P-value
%JAK2V617F at IFN stop (for a 10% difference)
1.4 (1.18-1.60) <0.0001
Time since diagnosis(for a 2-year difference)
1.2 (1.05-1.46) 0.011
EFS: Thrombosis, transformation, death
• 5-year EFS: 92% (95%CI, 87-97) • 10-year EFS: 72% (95%CI, 62-84)
Selective impact of IFN
AOP2014 / P1101 vs. JAK2V617F
• AOP2014/P1101 specifically targets JAK2V617Ferythroïd progenitors in vitro
0
20
40
60
80
100
treatment
% r
es
idu
al c
olo
nie
s/u
ntr
ea
ted
co
nd
itio
n **
******
***
AOP 0,5ug/ml with Epo
AOP 0,5ug/ml w/o Epo
AOP 2ug/ml with Epo
AOP 2ug/ml w/o Epo
0
20
40
60
80
100
untreated AOP0,5µg/ml
AOP2µg/ml
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
untreated AOP 0,5µg/ml AOP 2µg/ml
V617F/V617F
V617F/WT
WT/WT
AOP2014 / P1101 vs. JAK2V617F
• In vivo: PROUD-PV cohort
• 13 (of 257) patients randomized in France (5 AOP2014, 8 HU)
• Evolution of %JAK2V617F:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0 6 12
AOP2014/P1101
HU
AOP2014 / P1101 vs. JAK2V617F
• In vivo: PROUD-PV cohort
• BM progenitors could be studied in 10/13 French pts, 3 treated with AOP2014 and 7 with HU
• ratio of the proportions of EECs after and before treatment
AOP2014 / P1101 vs. JAK2V617F
• In vivo: PROUD-PV cohort
• BM progenitors could be studied in 10/13 French pts, 3 treated with AOP2014 and 7 with HU
• ratio of mutant to wild-type JAK2 colonies was determined in cultured progenitors obtained before and 1 year after treatment initiation
AOP2014 / P1101 vs. JAK2V617F
• In vivo: PROUD-PV cohort
• BM progenitors could be studied in 10/13 French pts, 3 treated with AOP2014 and 7 with HU
• ratio of mutant to wild-type JAK2 colonies was determined in cultured progenitors obtained before and 1 year after treatment initiation
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 6 12
AOP2014/P1101
HU
Conclusion
• IFN alpha is the only drug able to induce significant rates of clinical, hematological, histopathological and molecular responses in MPN patients
• Reducing the mutant allele burden could translate in higher probability of:
remaining in complete hematological response without therapy
longer event free survival
• Early treatment with IFN could also be a key factor to alter disease evolution