california freight mobility

30
Bruce de Terra Chief, Office of System and Freight Planning Division of Transportation Planning California Department of Transportation California Freight Mobility 1 California Freight Mobility - June 2011

Upload: winter

Post on 25-Feb-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

California Freight Mobility. Bruce de Terra Chief, Office of System and Freight Planning Division of Transportation Planning California Department of Transportation. To Infinity and Beyond. California – a land of dreamers, visionaries and doers. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: California Freight Mobility

Bruce de TerraChief, Office of System and Freight Planning Division of Transportation PlanningCalifornia Department of Transportation

California Freight Mobility

California Freight Mobility - June 2011

Page 2: California Freight Mobility

To Infinity and Beyond

California – a land of dreamers, visionaries and doers.Space Shuttle Endeavour, our most expensive freight mode, final landing at the California Science Center in L.A. There is a transportation future, help invent that future.

Page 3: California Freight Mobility

California Freight Mobility - June 2011 3

Page 4: California Freight Mobility

Bruce’s View The TruthTransportation is a corner-stone of every empire, multi-national business & power region that has ever existed. It is perhaps the only common denominator among them.Caltrans and our planning work are essential to California’s future. Either we do that work, or someone else will.We’ve got to have fun while doing our jobs well.

Page 5: California Freight Mobility

Presentation Topics

California Freight System Overview

Caltrans Freight Program Activities

Page 6: California Freight Mobility

Freight System Overview

SeaportsRailroadsTruckingIntermodal FacilitiesAir Freight Impacts

Page 7: California Freight Mobility
Page 8: California Freight Mobility

Got TEU?Twenty-Foot Equivalent Unit

Ships – 11,000 (Panamax 4,500),Trains 240 & Trucks 1

Page 9: California Freight Mobility

12 Seaports – an Evolving SystemLos Angeles - #1 in TEUs nationallyLong Beach - #2 in TEUs nationally

Combined, # 5 in world

Oakland - #5 in TEUs nationally-50/50 split9 other CA deepwater ports – mostly bulk, one private – who can name them all?Competition: West Coast ports, Panama Canal expansion, Gulf & East Coast portsLesser ports and harbors – here fishy fishy

Page 10: California Freight Mobility

God is not making new deep water seaports in California.

It would take an act of God to get a new human made deep water seaport through the NEPA/CEQA process.Ports are fragile economic entities that are generally owned by local jurisdictions under Tidelands Public Trust. They are California’s ultimate PPP enterprise.

Page 11: California Freight Mobility
Page 12: California Freight Mobility

Freight Railroads

Roughly 400 mile minimum threshold, very efficient, up to 8,000 foot long trains Class I – privately owned

Union Pacific (UP) Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Issues: capacity, passenger rail, grade crossings, safety,

community impacts, air quality, technology.

Shortline Railroads – no, not Monopoly

Page 13: California Freight Mobility

Class I Railroad Spending* on Infrastructure vs. State Highway Agency Spending* - 2006

RR vs SHS 2006 spending

*Capital outlays plus maintenance expenses.

Sources: FHWA Highway Statistics Table SF-12; AAR

1. Texas $7.572. Florida $5.693. California $4.19

Union Pacific $4.17BNSF $3.89

4. New York $3.595. Pennsylvania $3.306. Illinois $3.30

CSX $2.627. Michigan $2.618. North Carolina $2.489. Ohio $2.14

Norfolk Southern $2.1210. Georgia $1.88

$ in Billions

Page 14: California Freight Mobility

UP California Business Dimensions

Ag Products 17%

Autos 10%

Chemicals 7%

Energy 2%

Industrial Products15%

TEU Intermodal49%

Page 15: California Freight Mobility
Page 16: California Freight Mobility

TruckingTruckingShort DistanceLong Distance

TEU vs 53’ truck length - repackingI-710 – demand exceeding capacityRestrictions on where trucks can goSmall operators - LaborIntermodal Facilities – pressure for mode shift to electric train/shuttle

Page 17: California Freight Mobility

Trucking Issues

More & heavier trucksDeteriorating pavementFuel and emissions regulationsCost of environmental complianceSafetyTraffic Congestion

Page 18: California Freight Mobility

Intermodal FacilitiesSCIG – near dock: Scottish Curling-Ice Group, Submarine Cable Improvement Group, Southern California International Gateway – BNSF

Hobart – near downtown L.A.: “If it were a hub for ships instead of trains, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.'s Hobart rail yard would rank as the fourth-largest U.S. container port, behind Los Angeles, Long Beach and New York-New Jersey.”

San Pedro Bay Ports Clean Air Action PlanInland Empire – Jobs, Jobs, Jobs & impacts - future shift to High Desert?

Page 19: California Freight Mobility
Page 20: California Freight Mobility

Air FreightIn 2003 CA airports handled 22% of all U.S. air shipments with LAX #2 and SFO #4 in nation. LAX #13 in world - currentHigh Value & low weight – $116 billion in value in 2003 handled by CA airports.Much cargo time sensitive.Airports publicly owned – another PPPRelatively easy mode to loose share, but often use same aircraft as passengers.

Page 21: California Freight Mobility

California Freight Mobility - June 2011 21

Impacts

Toxic air pollution from diesel exhaust (particulate matter, NOx, SOx).Environmental Justice issues – disproportionate impacts to neighboring communities along freight corridors and nodes such as respiratory disease, noise and visual blight.Climate Change - Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions.Stress on an already over burdened transportation system.

Page 22: California Freight Mobility

Caltrans Freight ProgramGoals & objectivesGoods Movement Action Plan (GMAP)Trade Corridor Improvement Fund – (TCIF) Prop 1BNew initiatives: California Freight Mobility Plan, Rail Plan Update, Freight ModelOverarching Issues: community impacts, air quality, climate change, sea level rise, competition, physical constraint, $$$

Page 23: California Freight Mobility

Caltrans Freight Program Goals

Improve freight mobility: improved throughput, velocity, reliability, access; reduced congestion.

Improve California’s economy: economic development, jobs retention and creation, reduced transport costs.

Page 24: California Freight Mobility

Improve California’s environment: reduced air emissions, reduced community impacts, enhanced environmental justice, ballast.

Increase public safety and security: reduced roadway and rail incidents, increased security at ports-of-entry.

Caltrans Freight Program Goals

Page 25: California Freight Mobility

Goods Movement Action Plan (GMAP)

Groundbreaking approach involving Caltrans, Agency, Air Resources Board, Regions, Industry, others.

2005 Phase I: 180 projects/groups, $47 billion.

2007 Phase II: 24 projects/groups, $10 billion.

Expect to see a National Freight policy – and give a wink to the folks who developed GMAP.

Page 26: California Freight Mobility

Trade Corridor Improvement Fund (TCIF)

$2 billion from State Proposition 1B bond, $1 billion SHOPP added.

79 projects, with a total cost of $8 billion.

Includes highway capacity, grade separations, rail capacity projects, and port access projects (bridges, interchanges, rail yards).

Page 27: California Freight Mobility

Federal TIGER Program

Colton Crossing ($33.8 m),

Oakland/Stockton/West Sacramento “Green Trade Corridor” ($30m),

Otay Mesa POE/I-805-SR 905 ($20.2m),

Doyle Drive in SF($46m).

Page 28: California Freight Mobility

New Initiatives

California Freight Mobility Plan – an update of the GMAP and then some: CSULB & USCRail Plan Update - includes freight rail as well as the traditional passenger and pending HSRStatewide Freight Model - supporting the CIB – UC IrvineSCAG - Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy http://www.scag.ca.gov/goodsmove/regionalplan.htmSan Joaquin Valley - San Joaquin Valley Interregional Goods Movement Plan

Page 29: California Freight Mobility

Overarching Freight Issues

How can California • maximize economic benefits and • minimize environmental and

community impacts while • remaining competitive • in an intense global freight market?

Page 30: California Freight Mobility

Solutuions?Vehicle technology improvements

Fuel improvements

System and mode operational improvements

Infrastructure Improvements

Partnerships

All of us working together.