cagp letter to adidas

Upload: consumerprosperity

Post on 07-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 CAGP Letter to Adidas

    1/2

    Consumers Alliance for Global Prosperity

    1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW | Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20006 | +1 (202) 261-6592

    September 15, 2011

    Mr. Herbert HainerChief Executive Officer

    adidas Group

    Adi-Dassler-Strasse 1Herzogenaurach, 91074Germany

    Dear Mr. Hainer:

    I write with disappointment concerning adidas Groups August 26 decision to accept the baseless

    demands of Greenpeace Internationals Detox campaign. Your company recently stated, The

    adidas Group has together with other brands been working tirelessly in recent weeks to bring theindustry together in a forum to develop a roadmap that will address the 'zero discharge' challenge

    that Greenpeace has posed. The Consumers Alliance for Global Prosperity finds this to be an

    unfortunate development.

    The Consumers Alliance supports efforts undertaken to achieve a cleaner environment. The

    efforts of Greenpeace carried out in the name of conservation, however, are not always what they

    seem. In fact, our Alliance believes that your company is a victim of considerable greenmail the blackmailing of multinational corporations by environmental activists. This is particularly

    frustrating since adidas Group did not fight back and defend its products. And now is especially

    not the time to capitulate to this environmental organizations smear tactics, especiallyconsidering the tepid economic climate globally.

    For the sake of your customers budgets and the livelihoods of workers in developing nations, I

    urge you to reverse course and reject Greenpeaces radical environmentalism, a myopic ideologythat restricts free trade, imposes hardship on workers and shackles consumers with higher prices

    and fewer choices. In addition, adidas Groups acceptance of Greenpeaces ransom will

    negatively affect many other stakeholders throughout your supply chain.

    In fact, as the worlds second-largest sports apparel manufacturer, you and your colleagues know

    best how to manage a global supply chainfrom cotton mills to dye houses and manufacturing

    facilitiesnot Greenpeace. Why then are you yielding to its biased claims, especially concerningthe use of nonylphenol ethoxylates? Greenpeace is nothing more than a special interest pressure

    group and has repeatedly shown not only its disregard for science, technology and developing

    world forestry and agriculture, but also a willingness to treat myth as fact.

    adidas Groups capitulation to Greenpeaces latest anti-trade and pro-poverty advocacy is

    emblematic of a larger trend. Accordingly, I would like to remind you what Greenpeace co-

    founder Dr. Patrick Moore has stated previously concerning his disassociation with the

  • 8/4/2019 CAGP Letter to Adidas

    2/2

    Consumers Alliance for Global Prosperity

    1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW | Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20006 | +1 (202) 261-6592

    organization: [Greenpeace is] anti-corporatism, anti-capitalism, anti-industry, and [it] basically

    learned to use green language in a way that really was cloaking an agenda that had more to do

    with anti-globalization and anti-capitalism than it did anything to do with science or ecology.

    While adidas formulates its promised action plan over the next seven weeks, I would also like to

    remind you of the recent ill fate of the Gibson Guitar Corporation in Nashville, Tennessee.Gibson has time and again partnered with radical environmental organizations with the hope ofavoiding their wrath. Through partnerships with the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), the

    Rainforest Alliance and others, Gibson accepted many of their biased and misguided principles.

    And how were they rewarded? Not with acceptance or praise, but rather with raids by armed

    agents of the U.S. federal government and increased loathing from other members of the greenmovement. The Consumers Alliance hopes that adidas Group ultimately does not make the same

    mistake.

    Again, I implore you to stand up for your customers and those whose jobs depend on the

    manufacturing and trade that Greenpeace erroneously campaigns against. If not, an extremist

    green campaign will be successful in dragging your iconic black Three Stripes into the red.

    Thank you for your consideration.

    Very truly yours,

    Andrew LangerDirector

    Consumers Alliance for Global Prosperity

    Cc: Glenn Bennett, head of global operationsJan Runau, chief corporate communications officer

    Katja Schreiber, senior corporate public relations manager

    Erich Stamminger, chief executive officer, adidas brand