bus 716 final presentation (1)
TRANSCRIPT
S
Back testing strategies on NFLX
and Nasdaq
BY:Mitchel D Fahey
What is Back Testing?
-Back Testing is an important investigation of the history of a particular equity, index, commodity or asset class.
It is a way of doing very in depth research into the history of how an underlying security trades with regards to parameters that a user sets up
You take historical data by: daily prices, weekly prices, or monthly prices. You then go back as far as possible and get the actual data for the underlying security that one would want to trade or test.
The user then picks key metrics that they want to test for. The user may use simple moving averages such as: 20-day, 50-day, 200-day simple moving averages, or exponential moving averages. Then you test these ranges in a data series using excel or through a computer programming algorithm.
Why is it Important and Pros and Cons of doing it
We need to see how the underlying security performs in different economic scenarios as new ones are always arising and business cycles are always going to: start, end, or currently going on.
We need to understand how geo politics, currency issues, commodity prices and a whole bunch of other factors has had an impact on the underlying security throughout all of history. If back testing is not done we will have no idea, at all, on how the security may react to these scenarios going into the future.
PROS
It will provide a general sense of price reaction history in the underlying security when economical factors or political factors present themselves
It allows investors the chance to come up with a theory or trading strategy that they believe will be successful and actually map it out to see if it worked in the past, which may give some encouragement to go ahead with the strategy.
CONS
Even though a strategy may work well in a back testing model does not mean, in any circumstances, that it will for sure work in the future. There are no repeat days or exact same circumstances in the market, so an entry and exit strategy should be well thought out before going forward with any trading strategy.
MUST be careful not to fit historical data to justify parameters, MAY want to have parameters in place first
Back Testing NFLX
Buy open and sell close for its history
Would have made a return of around 89%
Very good and still missing some key ups and (downs) from after market and pre market
3 570 11371704227128380
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
NFLX Investing $1,000
Series1
$$$
Back Testing NFLX
NFLX investing on Thursday
NFLX Investing on Monday
Monda
y
Tues
day
Wed
nesd
ay
Thur
sday
Frid
ay
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Series1
NFLX Backtesting
Found that Investing $1,000 on a specific day, Friday was the worst as we would end up with $244.13
Investing on Thursday vastly was superior to all others where we would end up with $12,220 vs just investing in NFLX with this pattern would yield us around $5,1601 83 165247329411493575
0500
1,0001,500
NFLX Investing on Friday
Series1
$$$$
3 570 11371704227128380
2,000
4,000
6,000
NFLX Investing $1,000
Series1
$$$
1 75 1492232973714455195930
4,000
8,000
12,000
NFLX investing on Thursday
Series1
$$$$
More on NFLX
Thursday was the only day that actually out performed NFLX just buying open and selling close every day.
Every other day did much worse and two of the days we would have lost a lot of our investment
Nasdaq
By above 20 day SMA, short below 20
day SMABuy and hold the
index
11 162132314841645180619671$0.00
$500,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$2,500,000.00
$3,000,000.00
$3,500,000.00
$4,000,000.00
$4,500,000.00
$5,000,000.00
20 Day SMA
20 Day SMA
11 1414281742205623702684299832$0.00
$10,000.00
$20,000.00
$30,000.00
$40,000.00
$50,000.00
$60,000.00
Buy Index
Buy Index
More on 20 day
Total Profit of $2,472,178 vs $49,077
Geomean Return of 19.3% vs 9.3 %
Max drawdown of 47.1% vs 78%
6,145 Winning Trades, 4,980 losing trades
Biggest loss of -$479,052
Biggest gain of 346,933
11 162132314841645180619671$0.00
$500,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$2,500,000.00
$3,000,000.00
$3,500,000.00
$4,000,000.00
$4,500,000.00
$5,000,000.00
20 Day SMA
20 Day SMA
Nasdaq 20 Day EMA Back test
Total Profit = $2,391,264.84
Max Drawdown= 51%
Geo Return= 19.2%
Winning Trades= 6,143
Losing Trades=4,982
Biggest losing Trade= -$476,264,31
Biggest Winning Trade= $349,032.72
11 1621 3231 4841 6451 8061 9671$0.00
$1,000,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$3,000,000.00
$4,000,000.00
$5,000,000.00
$6,000,000.00
20 Day EMA
20 Day EMA
Nasdaq 20 Day EMA/SMA
Profit = $31,245.65
Yes Trades= 5913
No Trades= 5212 This is a lot higher than two
previous
Max drawdown of 56%
Geo Return=8.2% - lower than just Long Nasdaq
Losing trade = -$6,317.65
Winning Trade= $ 4,772.34
11 2242447367048935$0.00
$10,000.00
$20,000.00
$30,000.00
$40,000.00
$50,000.00
$60,000.00
$70,000.00
20-Day EMA/20-Day SMA
20-Day EMA/20-Day SMA
Nasdaq-By 50 Day, Sell on Close when 200 Day
crosses above
Total profit = $501,471.79
Winning Trades= 5,400
Losing Trades= 3,504 Lowest number of losing trades of all
models tested
No Change = 2,042
Maximum Drawdown=20% Lowest of all tested
Geomean Return=15.3%
Biggest losing trade= -$915.82
Largest winning trade= $1,208.44
11 1837 3663 5489 7315 9141$0.00
$100,000.00
$200,000.00
$300,000.00
$400,000.00
$500,000.00
$600,000.00
50/200-day MA
200-day MA
Nasdaq Summary
Buy and hold
Biggest Loss= -$3,554.90
Biggest Gain= $3,248.30
Drawdown=-78%
Return=9.3%
Best from back testing
50-day/200-day strategy drawdown =-20%
20-day SMA Return= 19.3%
Total Profit = $2,472,178 from 20 day SMA
Lowest Return = 20 day EMA/20 day SMA 8.5% lower than buy and hold
Nasdaq Summary
I learned that back testing and following a moving average can pay off in a big way
Having a simple strategy such as going long 20 day SMA, and shorting below level paid off in a HUGE way
All strategies avoided as big of a drawdown as Buy and Hold
Having more signals that are closer together does NOT necessarily give better return 20 Day EMA/SMA provided
lower return than buy and hold and would have to pay comissions
The 50 Day/200 Day strategy gave us a low drawdown and big return and would have had to make less trades
Different Strategies for Hedge Funds
Equity Long-Short Hedge Funds take both
long and short positions in equities and etf’s
This is the most common type of hedge fund
Jim Cramer of Cramer-Berkowitz and Doug Kass of Seabreeze partners.
Short Only Hedge funds Not as popular, only focused on
securities that are believed to be overvalued
Jim Chanos of Kynikos Associates Claims they manage $1 Billion
and they dig through financials to find
Companies that materially overstate earnings
Unsustainable or operationally flawed business plan
Engaged in outright fraud.
More Hedge Fund Strategies
Activist Hedge Fund Manager
Buy big stake in a company and force management to appoint board members that will be share holder friendly
Becoming more popular
Carl Ichan, David Einhorn, Bill Ackmen
Usually involves trying to get company to do buybacks or increase dividends
Also mergers and sales.
Fixed Income- Bill Gross, trading bonds from around the world