buddha and buddhism 13

Download Buddha and Buddhism 13

Post on 14-Apr-2018




0 download

Embed Size (px)


  • 7/30/2019 Buddha and Buddhism 13



    Dr. Crozier, in the Fortnightly Review for February1899, is very hostile to Buddhism and the Indian re-ligions. He announces that " thought in its evolutionwill no more return to them than the animal kingdomwill return to the marsupials." The Indian God, heholds, is an " impotent " God. He is described as a" Great Soul," and modern thought requires a God withwill and energy, a God who can, in fact, look after theworld. The Indian Gods discountenance action andwork on behalf of our fellow-men, and lead their devoteesto occupy themselves mainly in saving their own souls "by " thinking of this Supreme Soul when in a state ofecstasy, the eyes being fixed on the tip of the nose."

    This deserves attention. The Indian philosophershave no doubt always been a little vague about theirGod. This is done purposely. They say that if youbegin to limit the Absolute it becomes the Absoluteno longer. " Un Dieu defini," says the French wit," c'est un Dieu fini !The East clings to symbols, to metaphor. They breaktheir God to pieces and make his attributes into little

    Gods. The West loves a God thatwhat shall I say ?can be photographed. " From his tapas," says a Buddhistbook, speaking of the Buddha of Buddhas, " the uni-


  • 7/30/2019 Buddha and Buddhism 13


    210 BUDDHA AND BUDDHISMverse was produced by him. He is the Iswara (Creator),the infinite, the form of all things yet formless."

    Here we are in the presence of two ideas thatelucidate one another. In India the Rishi, themagician, was said to perform his magical acts whenin tapas, the mystical, magical trance. Hence theBuddha of Buddhas and the Brahmin Gods are imagedin what Dr. Crozier calls " a state of ecstasy, the eyesbeing fixed on the tip of the nose," and if Brahmacreated evolution and then sate still, he really seemsquite as much up to modern thought as, say, Paley'swatchmaker God who goes about correcting the worksof his not quite perfect watches. But this Indiansymbolism goes much deeper. The enlightened manand the enlightening God have the same symbolicrepresentation, because in a sense they are one.

    " What is God ? " said the missionary Robson to aBrahmin

    " He is talking to you."There lies the distinction between the East and the

    West. The God of the West is outside humanity. TheGod of the East is sought for in the human breast.But in justice to Dr. Crozier, we may mention that

    the modern, up-to-date philosophers fare as badly athis hands as the marsupial Gods of India. He citesa speech uttered by Carlyle when he called upon thatgreat sage in Chelsea. " We have reached the com-fortable conclusion that God is a myth, that the soul isgas, and the next world a coffin." As a substitute forall this, Dr. Crozier gives us a philosophy of his own.He calls it the " Scale in the Mind." In every one of

    us is a sort of "Judge." He is "in the mind," but" not of the mind." He is neither " conscience, honour,

  • 7/30/2019 Buddha and Buddhism 13


    CONCLUSION 211beauty, reverence, nor love." He is a sort, in fact, ofsubliminal Baron Hawkins, and he tells even thehigher animals when they are doing wrong. 1 But isall this getting rid of the marsupial Brahma, or bring-ing him back again in a horse-hair wig ?

    There are differences between the two Brahmas, butis the balance of merits with Dr. Crozier's Brahma?The King of Benin, when his favourite wife has thetic douloureux, believes that Mumbo Jumbo is angrybecause he has broken some silly law of the Taboo.At once inspired by his remorse or his " Scale in theMind," he orders the massacre of fifty subjects toappease the deity. Does not this give us the differencebetween Dr. Crozier's and the Indian Brahma. The firstis ready to inspire anybody ; the second must have themind prepared and the soul purified before he can enter.One chief popular objection to Buddhism runs after

    this fashion. " It is much better that a respectableyoung man should toil and till, and marry and raise upa healthy family, than abandon his young wife likeBuddha and sit idly under a tree.

    This is true ; but if the Indian philosophers had notreasoned and reflected in solitude, there would probablystill be nothing to till, and the respectable young manwould have to share his wife with the rest of thevillage or, perhaps, monkey gang. The philosopher'swork was at first utilitarian, as well as superstitious.He fashioned bows and arrows, as well as imprecations.He designed rude strategy and rude politics. He super-intended agriculture. He invented rude moral codes.

    Three main points are urged by Dr. Crozier againstBuddha

    1 Crozier, My Inner Life, p. 433.

  • 7/30/2019 Buddha and Buddhism 13


    212 BUDDHA AND BUDDHISM1. He discountenanced work and action on behalf of

    our fellow-men.2. He urged folks to save their own souls by con-

    templation and asceticism.3. Buddhism had no support in its system for a

    doctrine of love.1I will write down a few of the achievements of this

    inactive Buddha and the army of Bhikshus that hedirected

    1. The most formidable priestly tyranny that theworld had ever seen crumbled away before his attack,and the followers of Buddha were paramount in Indiafor a thousand years.

    2. The institution of caste was assailed and over-turned.

    3. Polygamy was for the first time pronouncedimmoral, and slavery condemned.

    4. Woman, from being considered a chattel anda beast of burden, was for the first time consideredman's equal, and allowed to develop her spiritual life.

    5. All bloodshed, whether with the knife of the priestor the sword of the conqueror, was rigidly forbidden.

    6. Also, for the first time in the religious history ofmankind, the awakening of the spiritual life of the indi-vidual was substituted for religion by body corporate.It is also certain that Buddha was the first to proclaimthat duty was to be sought in the eternal principles ofmorality and justice, and not in animal sacrifices andlocal formalities invented by the fancy of priests.

    7. The principle of religious propagandism was forthe first time introduced with its two great instruments,the missionary and the preacher.

    1 Fortnightly Review, February 1899

  • 7/30/2019 Buddha and Buddhism 13


    CONCLUSION 2138. By these, India, China, Bactria, and Japan, were

    proselytised; and the Buddhist missionaries overranPersia and Egypt. This success was effected by moralmeans alone, for Buddhism is the one religion guiltlessof coercion. It is reckoned that one-third of humanityis still in its fold.

    9. Without entering any further into the greatquestion of what Christ added to or what Christremoved from Essenism, it is plain that from Buddhacame the main elements that changed Mosaism intothe leading creed of Europe.

    10. One great gift of Buddha to the world is quiteoverlooked. In the Institutes of Manu are noted downall sorts of penalties for the heretics who question theBrahmin claims. We know, too, that Plato was soldas a slave for his opinions, and Socrates put to death.Buddhism is the religion of the individual, and fromthe first it seems to have held toleration of othercreeds as a logical outcome. A few years ago anEnglish officer in Ceylon, in civil employ, gained theaffections of his district. At his death the Buddhistscame forward and offered to build an English churchas a memorial. In India during the one thousandyears of Buddhist rule all creeds and all philosophieswere tolerated, a priceless and unexampled boon tothe thought of the world.The second contention of Dr. Crozier is that

    Buddhism is pure selfishness; and the third, thatBuddha had no idea of love, whereas Jesus by Hissacrifice saved the world.A clever Buddhist answered the missionaries a fewyears ago in a little work called Happiness, and inhis view the selfishness and absence of love and

  • 7/30/2019 Buddha and Buddhism 13


    214 BUDDHA AND BUDDHISMcharity were to be found in quite a different direction.This anonymous Buddhist affirmed that the God ofthe Christians was chiefly an object to be feared.He lived in a remote " heaven " listening to perpetualsongs of praise. He was a "jealous God" ready toconsign almost all His creatures to perpetual torment,including "800,000,000 Buddhists in every fiftyyears," as the author was assured by a missionary.This God proclaimed that credulity and subserviencyto His priests was the supreme human merit, andthat independent thought, reason, philosophy, andsoul dreams, the great sins. His motto was, "Thefear of God is the beginning of wisdom."Upon this statement the writer pounced with

    much vivacity. There was an Ego and a non-Ego,and this non-Ego was God. He was not in a remoteheaven but here on earth, and the one object of theBuddhist was to sink the Ego and its petty dreamsand become in harmony with the Supreme Mind.With the Buddhist the fear of the Ego was thebeginning of wisdom; not the fear of the non-Ego,which was wisdom itself.

    I do not think it does much good to compareBuddhism and Christianity under their modernaspects, and to argue from these that Jesus taughtthis and Buddha that. The house of Aaron keptthe " key " of the great Temple of " Knowledge," withits hopes and dreams. They refused to go in them-selves, and " them that were entering they hindered "(Luke xi. 52). Buddha likewise found a mischievoushereditary priesthood, and his great work, like thatof Jesus, was to democratise religion. His specialcharacteristic as an epoch-maker I conceive to be

  • 7/30/2019 Buddha and Buddhism 13


    CONCLUSION 215this, that he devised less a teaching than an apparatusfor spreading a teaching. His famished, half-nakedParivrdjikas marched everywhere, taught eve


View more >