bucking the film market
TRANSCRIPT
Fortnight Publications Ltd.
Bucking the Film MarketAuthor(s): John O'Farrell and Grainne FarrenSource: Fortnight, No. 316 (Apr., 1993), pp. 44-45Published by: Fortnight Publications Ltd.Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25553966 .
Accessed: 28/06/2014 19:14
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Fortnight Publications Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Fortnight.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 193.105.245.130 on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:14:32 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
S - " *1 a-.
Bucking the
film market
During last month's Dublin Film Festival,
JOHN O'FARRELL took John Sayles aside to
talk about the financing of film-making. Right?
GRAINNE FARREN
stayed strictly in front of the screen.
Jtlow do movies get made?
Here's an example, from the independent US
director John Sayles. His mentor, Roger Corman,
had hired Boris Karloff for 15 days worth of shooting for a schlock horror job called The Howling. The
film finished under schedule and $200,000 under
budget, and Karloff was only used (and paid) for 13
days work. Karloff s agent demanded the agreed two
further days money, so Corman said to Peter Bog
dan ovich: "Write me a movie this weekend that will
cost $200,000 maximum and that can use Karloff for
two days." Bogdanovich arrived in on Monday with
the script and the movie was made?Karloff
and all. Targets (1968) is now considered a
classic B-movie.
Currently, the average price of a Hollywood
movie is $30 million. With stars like Nicholson
and Schwarzenegger demanding $6 million a
time, it is tempting to dismiss the pleas of
impoverishment from film-makers as the un
necessary demands of spoilt children.
Yet Sayles' first film, The Return of the
Secaucus Seven (1980), was written for and
made with two cameras, seven free actor friends
and $40,000 Sayles had earned from writing
disaster movie scripts for Corman. His latest,
the charming and evocative Passion Fish, still
had a budget of only $3 million.
Funding came from pre-sales to video dis
tributors, Home Box Office (cable TV) and the
cinematic distributor Miramax. Additional sup
port came from individuals, from dentists to
stockbrokers, who either wanted to learn about movie
making or were interested in the risky business of
investing in films.
A similar thing happened to Stefan Schwarz, the
amiable young director of the amiable Scottish road
movie Soft Top, Hard Shoulder. No money came
from the principal supporters of new British film,
BBC or Channel Four, but a (publicity-shy) backer
put up most of the ?1.2 million budget?so his son
could observe film-making at first hand. Twelve "City
types" donated ?12,000 for pre-production and shoot
ing started with the tax year (last April). Post-produc
tion was looked after by VAT returns.
The only hiccup was when the catering truck blew
up on the third day of shooting. The producer,
FILM
u
Richard Holmes, had to collect the cast and crew's
credit cards to pay for food, bed and breakfasts and
petrol, but the VAT man saved the day and the film
was completed and is doing very nicely, thank you.
In the republic, meanwhile, the debate on film
funding is warming up. On RTE's Questions and
Answers late in February, Peter Sheridan (Jim's
brother) outlined how the scrapping of the Irish
Film Board in 1987, with its important 'start-up'
monies, had virtually killed off indigenous cinema
and how the 'section 35' tax incentive replacement
hadn't worked. His fellow panellist, Brian Lenihan
(tanaiste at the time), replied that he had
never heard before the argument that pro
spective investors in film liked someone else to
risk the initial ?100,000 or so to get the project
off the ground, and he would support "whole
heartedly" the reinstatement of the IFB.
' A week later, in a letter to the Irish Times,
I Muiris Mac Conghail, the former IFB chair,
said the Haughey government of 1987 had
J given no opportunity to discuss the decision.
The board had invested ?1.2 million in ten
i feature films, which in total had cost ?6.1
million, including ?3.3 million attracted in
I foreign investment. One fifth of that ?6 mil
I lion plus had found its way back to the excheq uer in tax, social insurance, VAT and so on.
The performance of the board, Mr Mac
Conghail wrote, thus compared more than
i favourably with the targets then set by the
Industrial Development Authority for itself.
At the opening of Film Base in the Irish Film
Centre in Dublin the previous Wednesday, the arts
minister, Michael D Higgins, announced he would
go straight to legislation on a new film board, with
out a white paper. The following Wednesday, how
ever, Mr Higgins opened the Dublin Film Festival
with an announcement that he would go straight to
"discussions on a white paper" on a new IFB, so that
"our very talented film-makers" should have some
thing to do "by 1996".
John Boorman once described making movies as
"turning money into light". It now seems that, with
the ever-tightening government pursestrings hold
ing back Mr Higgins' ebullience, we will just have to
watch this (dark) space. ^
44 Fortnight april 1993
This content downloaded from 193.105.245.130 on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:14:32 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
i^H ARTS
ORLANDO
From the momentwhen Queen Elizabeth I (Quentin
Crisp) tells Orlando "Do not fade. Do not wither. Do
not grow old", his life is never the same again.
Orlando lives for four centuries, first as a young man,
then as a young woman. Waking up female one day
in the 18th century, she is pleased, seeing herself as
exactly the same person?"only the sex has changed".
But the law holds a different view. She is told that she
can no longer own her house because she is legally
dead and because she is a woman, "which amounts to
much the same thing". She discovers what it is like to
wear voluminous dresses and put up with the conde
scending remarks of men.
Tilda Swinton is perfectly cast as the hero/hero
ine, and the film, directed by Sally Potter, is true to
the spirit of Virginia Woolf s engaging fantasy. The
voice-overs and asides, even when not by Woolf,
sound the right note of wit and gentle irony. Instead
of ending in 1928, the story is extended to the
present day, with Orlando riding a motorbike and
dressed, like a natural woman, in trousers.
yonta's BLUE EYES
The story of Yonta's mysterious letter from an un
known admirer is set against a background of post
colonial Guinea Bissau. Cars run on potholed roads,
businesses struggle on despite power-cuts, and a
hero of the war of independence wonders if his
ideals have been forgotten by a generation more
concerned with football and discos. Despite the
shabby poverty of the setting, Flora Gomes' film
highlights the kindliness of the people, their cheer
ful optimism and the way they combine modern
urban living with African traditions.
SALE COMME UN ANGE (Dirty like an Angel)
Catherine Breillat's characters have few, if any, re
deeming features. The men are sexist, manipulative
liars, the women weak and self-deluding. Yet some
how it is not depressing and there are moments of
caustic humour. Claude Brasseur gives a convincing
portrayal of the misogynist middle-aged cop who
seduces his colleague's young wife. In a particularly
chilling scene, he amuses himself by showing a little
boy how to fire a revolver.
THE STORY OF QUI JU
This is directed by Zhang Yimou who made Raise the
Red Lantern, and again features Gong Li in the
leading role. She plays a stubborn peasant who seeks
justice when her husband is attacked by the village
chief?only her idea of justice is different from that
of bureaucrats and lawyers. While not in the same
league as Raise the Red Lantern, it is very enjoyable
and gives a
fascinating glimpse of life in rural China.
FIt~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ARCH~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~u
S
I w~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LA VIE DE BOHEME (Bohemian Life)
This is the Finnish director Aki Kaurismaki's latest
full-length film, derived from the novel by Henri
Munger on which Puccini based his opera. In black
and white and deliberately old-fashioned in style, it
pokes gentle fun at bohemians in Paris who want to
live for their art, undeterred by lack of talent or
boring necessities like paying the rent. The comedy
works, but the attempt at pathos doesn't really.
COMO AGUA PARA CHOCOLATE
(Like Water for Chocolate)
A tyrannical widowed mother, frustrated passion,
rivalry between sisters?if this sounds familiar, for
get it. This is no Lorca tragedy but a humorous and
visually beautiful Mexican film, based on a novel by
Laura Esquivel who also wrote the screenplay. Alfonso
Arau is the director. It goes on a shade too long, but
the theme of food as an expression of emotion is
lovingly sustained. Clumi Cavazos is a delight as the
youngest daughter, Tita, who cooks "con mucho
amor" for the man she is forbidden to marry.
MAD DOG AND GLORY
This was the surprise film, and is itself a surprise?as
what looks at first like a tough thriller turns into an
entertaining romantic comedy. It features Robert de
Niro as a fearful policeman, who has to free the
woman he loves from the clutches of a gangster.
WOMEN AND ANIMATION
This programme consisted of 12 short animation
films, with an amazing variety of styles and subjects.
One of the most memorable was Caroline Leafs
Two Sisters, which in the space of 11 minutes deals
with disfigurement, hiding away, over-protective ness and the need for acceptance. Her use of light
and shade to illustrate her theme is superb.
John Sayles?big screen, small budget
APRIL 1993 F O R T N I G H T 45
This content downloaded from 193.105.245.130 on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:14:32 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions