branford elementary schools 20062009
DESCRIPTION
Branford Elementary Schools CMT test scores 2006-2009 as a "show and know."TRANSCRIPT
Seeing with your eyes is but looking; seeing with your mind--knowing. -TJS
• “The main value of bar graphs…and picture graphs lies probably in school publicity and in the motivation of learning.” –Statistical Methods (Glass and Stanley)
• “A successful graph depends far more on careful thought and judgment than on techniques.” –Scates, 1942
Presentation OrganizationSet 1: Mean Scale Score Comparison—Shoreline,
North Haven, and State
Set 2: Randomized DRG D Sample Mean Scale Score Comparison
Set 3: Randomized DRG D Sample Percent Change Comparison—From 2006 to 2009
Set 4: DRG D Complete Comparison Ranking Leveled by Quintile by Mean Scale Score and
At/Above Goal Percentages
Sets 1, 2, 3, and 4 display 3rd and 4th Grade Scores for Reading, Writing, and Math. Sets 1, 2, and 4 Contain Data for Years 2006 through 2009.
Branford Public Schools
Comparison of 4th Generation CMT Scale Scores for Years 2006 through 2009
Regarding Branford’s Elementary Schools
District-Wide 3rd and 4th Grade: Test Scores Over a 4 Year Period:
A Trend Analysis
Why Use Scale Scores?
Scaled scores are particularly useful for comparing test scores over time, such as measuring semester-to-semester and year-to-year growth of individual students or groups of students in a content area. http://www.pearsonedmeasurement.com/research/faq_2e.htm
Unlike percentile rank scores, the interval between scores is equal. This means that you can average scale scores to compare groups of students or schools. http://www.ncrel.org/tech/claims/glossary.html
Scale Scores
Scale scores are useful in comparing performance in one subject area across classes, schools, districts, and other large populations, especially in monitoring change over time. http://www.k12.hi.us/~atr/evaluation/glossary.htm
…they can be added, subtracted, and averaged across test levels. This cannot be done with percentiles or grade equivalents. Wisconsin Student Assessment System Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Examinations
Set 1: Shoreline, State, and North Haven
This is not a randomized sample. Although some districts are DRG
D districts, generalization to a target population is not
appropriate.
Grade 3 Writing CMT Trend Lines 2006-2009
• Slide 1: Branford and State Average
• Slide 2: Branford, North Haven, and Shoreline
Content Area Sequence
WritingMath
Reading
Sequence is the same for 3rd and 4th Grades
Grade 3: Writing CMT Scale Score Comparisons
Writing 3rd Grade Scale Scores 2006-2009
245
250
255
260
265
270
275
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
Wri
tin
g S
cale
Sco
res
3rd
Gra
de
State Average
Branford
Grade 3: Writing CMT Scale Score Comparisons
Writing 3rd Grade Scale Scores 2006-2009
245
250
255
260
265
270
275
280
285
290
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
Wri
tin
g S
cale
Sco
res
3rd
Gra
de
Branford
Clinton
Guilford
Madison
North Haven
Old Saybrook
Westbrook
Grade 3 Math CMT Trend Lines 2006-2009
• Slide 1: Branford and State Average
• Slide 2: Branford, North Haven, and Shoreline
Grade 3: Math CMT Scale Score Comparisons
CMT 3rd Grade Branford/State Math Scale Scores 2006-2009
225
235
245
255
265
275
285
295
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
Mat
h S
cale
Sco
res
3rd
Gra
de
Branford
State
Grade 3: Math CMT Scale Score Comparisons
CMT 3rd Grade Math Scale Scores 2006-2009
245
250
255
260
265
270
275
280
285
290
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
Mat
h S
cale
Sco
res
Branford
Clinton
Guilford
Madison
NorthHaven
OldSaybrook
Westbrook
Grade 3 Reading CMT Trend Lines 2006-2009
• Slide 1: Branford and State Average
• Slide 2: Branford, North Haven, and Shoreline
Grade 3: Reading CMT Scale Score Comparisons
Reading Scale Scores 3rd Grade State/Branford 2006-2009
225
230
235
240
245
250
255
260
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
Sca
le S
core
s 3r
d G
rad
e State
Branford
Grade 3: Reading CMT Scale Score Comparisons
Reading CMT Scale Scores 3rd Grade 2006-2009
230
235
240
245
250
255
260
265
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
Sca
le S
core
s 3r
d G
rad
e
Branford
Clinton
Guilford
Madison
North Haven
Old Saybrook
Westbrook
Grade 4 Writing CMT Trend Lines 2006-2009
• Slide 1: Branford and State Average
• Slide 2: Branford, North Haven, and Shoreline
Grade 4: Writing CMT Scale Score Comparisons
Writing 4th Grade Branford/State Average CMT Scale Scores 2006-2009
245
250
255
260
265
270
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
CM
T S
cale
Sco
res
4th
Gra
de State
Branford
Grade 4: Writing CMT Scale Score Comparisons
Writing 4th Grade CMT Scale Scores 2006-2009
245
250
255
260
265
270
275
280
285
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
CM
T S
cale
Sco
res
4th
Gra
de
Branford
Clinton
Guilford
Madison
North Haven
Old Saybrook
East Lyme
Grade 4: Math CMT Trend Lines 2006 - 2009
• Slide 1: Branford and State Average
• Slide 2: Branford, North Haven, and Shoreline
Grade 4: Math CMT Scale Score Comparisons
Math 4th Grade CMT Branford/State Scale Scores 2006-2009
250
255
260
265
270
275
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
CM
T M
ath
Sca
le S
core
s 4t
h G
rad
e
State
Branford
Grade 4: Math CMT Scale Score Comparisons
Math 4th Grade CMT Scale Scores 2006-2009
250
255
260
265
270
275
280
285
290
295
300
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
CM
T M
ath
Sca
le S
core
s 4t
h G
rad
e
Branford
Clinton
Guilford
Madison
North Haven
Old Saybrook
East Lyme
Grade 4: Reading CMT Trend Lines 2006 - 2009
• Slide 1: Branford and State Average
• Slide 2: Branford, North Haven, and Shoreline
Grade 4: Reading CMT Scale Score Comparisons
Reading 4th Grade Branford/State CMT Scale Scores 2006-2009
240
245
250
255
260
265
270
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
4th
Gra
de
Sca
le S
core
s State
Branford
Grade 4: Reading CMT Scale Score Comparisons
Reading 4th Grade CMT Scale Scores 2006-2009
245
250
255
260
265
270
275
280
285
2006 2007 2008 2009
Years
4th
Gra
de
Sca
le S
core
s
Branford
Clinton
Guilford
Madison
North Haven
Old Saybrook
East Lyme
Set 2 and Set 3 follow. These 2 sets use randomized samples from Branford’s
DRG (D).
Randomization is a powerful statistical technique which permits
generalizing results from a relatively small sample to the
larger target population.
The following 2 sets of charts (At/Above Goal: 2006 through 2009; and Scale Score Percent Change: 2006 to 2009) were based on District Reference Group D (Branford’s reference group). Two samples were randomly selected from this DRG allowing comparisons to Branford and Connecticut’s state average. The districts were randomly selected by assigning numbers to the 23 other districts in Branford’s DRG. A random number generator was then used to select the sample thereby eliminating selection bias to allow a generalization of the results to the population DRG.
Random Number Generator
23 Random Numbers*
Sample One Sample Two Potential Sampling
14 07 04 18 01 22 16 15 05 17 08 11 21 13 10 12 06 20 03 23 09 02 19
* This table of 23 random numbers was produced according to the following specifications: Numbers were randomly selected from within the range of 1 to 23. Duplicate numbers were not allowed. A Seed number was not used.
District Reference Group (DRG)
1. Berlin 2. Bethel 3. Clinton 4. Colchester
5. Cromwell 6. East Granby 7. East Hampton 8. East Lyme
9. Ledyard 10. Milford 11. New Milford 12. Newington
13. North Haven 14. Old Saybrook 15. Rocky Hill 16. Shelton
17. Southington 18. Stonington 19. Wallingford 20. Waterford
21. Watertown 22. Wethersfield 23. Windsor
Random Sampling
Sample 1 Sample 2
14 Old Saybrook 15 Rocky Hill
07 East Hampton 05 Cromwell
04 Colchester 06 East Granby
18 Stonington 08 East Lyme
01 Berlin 11 New Milford
22 Wethersfield 21 Watertown
16 Shelton 13 North Haven
* Branford * Branford
* State * State
A total of 15 districts were included in the 2 samples (62.5% of the DRGs in DRG D are represented in the 2 samples). Sample 1 was randomly assigned to Percentage Change Chart Data and Sample 2 was randomly assigned to At Goal/Above Chart Data.
Percentage At Goal or Above 3rd and 4th Grade CMT 2006 - 2009
Goal and Proficiency are based on Scale Scores
3rd Grade: Goal ProficiencyMath 242 210
Reading 235 217Writing 240 212
4th Grade: Goal Proficiency Math 245 215 Reading 244 227
Writing 237 209
3rd Grade At/Above Goal
Trend Line Subject Sequence
Writing
Math
Reading
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
2006 2007 2008 2009
At G
oal
or
Ab
ove
Per
cen
tag
es
Years
3rd Grade Writing DRG D Sampling and State CMT At Goal or Above Percentages 2006-2009
State
Branford
East Lyme
New Milford
North Haven
Southington
Watertown
Rocky Hill
Cromwell
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
2006 2007 2008 2009
At G
oal
or
Ab
ove
Per
cen
tag
es
Years
3rd Grade Math DRG D Sampling and State CMT At Goal or Above Percentages
State
Branford
East Lyme
New Milford
North Haven
Southington
Watertown
Rocky Hill
Cromwell
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
2006 2007 2008 2009
At G
oal
or
Ab
ove
Per
cen
tag
es
Years
3rd Grade Reading DRG D Sampling and State CMT At Goal or Above Percentages 2006-2009
State
Branford
East Lyme
New Milford
North Haven
Southington
Watertown
Rocky Hill
Cromwell
4th Grade At/Above Goal
Trend Line Subject Sequence
Writing
Math
Reading
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
2006 2007 2008 2009
At G
oal
or
Ab
ove
Per
cen
tag
es
Years
4th Grade Writing DRG D Sampling and State CMT At Goal or Above Percentages 2006-2009
State
Branford
East Lyme
New Milford
North Haven
Southington
Watertown
Rocky Hill
Cromwell
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
2006 2007 2008 2009
At G
oal
or
Ab
ove
Per
cen
tag
es
Years
4th Grade Math DRG D Sampling and State CMT At Goal or Above Percentages 2006-2009
State
Branford
East Lyme
New Milford
North Haven
Southington
Watertown
Rocky Hill
Cromwell
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
2006 2007 2008 2009
At G
oal
or
Ab
ove
Per
cen
tag
es
Years
4th Grade Reading DRG D Sampling and State CMT At Goal or Above Percentages 2006-2009
State
Branford
East Lyme
New Milford
North Haven
Southington
Watertown
Rocky Hill
Cromwell
Bar Graphs of Scale Score Percent Change
4th Generation CMT Scale Scores Percent Change from 2006 to 2009
Percentage Change Calculation
Example: State Math Average Scale Score 2006 is 252.6
State Math Average Scale Score 2009 is 262.8
Dividing 262.8 by 252.6 results in an approximate percent change of +4% (less than .04 of one percent (.0004)
rounding error)
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1
Percent Change Scale Scores
DRG D Sampling w/State
3rd Grade Writing CMT Scale Score Percent Change 2006 - 2009
Old Saybrook
Shelton
State
Colchester
Wethersfield
Stonington
Berlin
East Hampton
Branford
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
1
Percent Change Scale Scores
DRG D Random Sampling w/State
3rd Grade Math CMT Scale Score Percent Change 2006 - 2009
Old Saybrook
Wethersfield
Colchester
State
Shelton
Stonington
Berlin
East Hampton
Branford
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Percent Change Scale Scores
DRG D Sampling w/State
Grade 3 Reading CMT Scale Score Percent Change 2006 - 2009
Old Saybrook
Colchester
Shelton
Wethersfield
State
Stonington
Berlin
East Hampton
Branford
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
Percent Change Scale Scores
DRG D Sampling w/State
Grade 4 Writing CMT Scale Score Percent Change 2006 - 2009
Colchester
East Hampton
Stonington
Wethersfield
State
Old Saybrook
Berlin
Shelton
Branford
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
1
Percent Change Scale Scores
DRG D Sampling w/State
4th Grade Math CMT Scale Score Percent Change 2006 -2009
Colchester
Old Saybrook
Wethersfield
East Hampton
Stonington
State
Berlin
Shelton
Branford
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
1
Percent Change Scale Scores
DRG D Sampling w/State
4th Grade Reading CMT Scale Score Percent Change 2006 - 2009
Colchester
Stonington
East Hampton
State
Wethersfield
Berlin
Shelton
Old Saybrook
Branford
District Reference Group D Comparative Rankings 2006-2009
Grades 3 and 4 Ranked by Mean Scale Scores and At/Above Goal in
Reading, Writing, and Math.
Branford Grd 3 Reading Scale Score DRG D Rank
2006 2007 2008 2009Grd 3 2006 Reading 2006 2007 Reading 2007 2008 Reading 2008 2009 Reading 2009QT Dist Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank
14 Branford 254.4 1 East Lyme 254.7 1 Bethel 255.9 1 Bethel 261.5 19 Bethel 252 2 Berlin 253.6 2 East Lyme 255.7 2 Old Saybrook 261 2
5 27 Clinton 251.7 3 Bethel 252.6 3 Stonington 253.7 3 Rocky Hill 256.4 3137 Stonington 250.1 4 Clinton 251 4 Berlin 251.5 4 East Granby 254.9 442 East Hampton 249.8 5 Branford 250.9 5 Rocky Hill 249.6 5 Newington 254.3 5
45 East Lyme 249 6 Stonington 250.8 6 East Granby 248.6 6 East Lyme 253.9 684 Milford 248.4 7 Old Saybrook 250.4 7 Newington 248.3 7 Stonington 253.8 7
4 40 East Granby 247.5 8 New Milford 249.7 8 North Haven 246.9 8 Cromwell 252.5 87 Berlin 246.4 9 East Hampton 246.1 9 Waterford 246.6 9 Ledyard 252.1 9
152 Waterford 246.1 10 Milford 245.5 10 Wallingford 246.2 10 Southington 250 10
106 Old Saybrook 245.8 11 East Granby 245.3 11 Old Saybrook 246.1 11 East Hampton 248.8 11131 Southington 244.8 12 Waterford 245.3 12 Milford 245.7 12 Milford 248.4 12
3 148 Wallingford 244 13 Newington 245.2 13 Clinton 245.6 13 North Haven 248 13 Median94 Newington 243 14 Cromwell 244.6 14 East Hampton 245.2 14 Shelton 247.9 14119 Rocky Hill 242.8 15 Wallingford 242.6 15 Shelton 244.4 15 Berlin 247.6 15
101 North Haven 242.5 16 North Haven 242.4 16 Southington 244.4 16 Colchester 247.3 1633 Cromwell 241.4 17 Ledyard 242.3 17 Ledyard 244.3 17 New Milford 246.5 17
2 126 Shelton 241 18 Shelton 241.6 18 Branford 244.1 18 Branford 245 1896 New Milford 240.9 19 Watertown 241.4 19 Colchester 239.4 19 Waterford 244 19159 Wethersfield 238 20 Southington 241.3 20 Wethersfield 238.4 20 Wethersfield 243.2 20
164 Windsor 236.6 21 Wethersfield 241.3 21 New Milford 237.3 21 Wallingford 242.7 210 State 235.7 22 Rocky Hill 239.9 22 Watertown 236.2 22 State 239.2 22
1 28 Colchester 235 23 State 235.9 23 State 236 23 Watertown 238 23153 Watertown 234.8 24 Colchester 235.8 24 Cromwell 235.4 24 Windsor 237.1 2472 Ledyard 232.1 25 Windsor 232.8 25 Windsor 222.5 25 Clinton 237 25
Branford Grd 3 Reading %Goal+ DRG D Rank2006 2007 2008 2009
Grd 3 2006 Reading 2006 2007 Reading 2007 2008 Reading 2008 2009 Reading 2009QT Dist Group %Goal+ Rank Group %Goal+ Rank Group %Goal+ Rank Group %Goal+ Rank
27 Clinton 77.1 1 Berlin 75.6 1 Bethel 78.2 1 Bethel 78.9 19 Bethel 74.4 2 East Lyme 73.2 2 East Lyme 69.5 2 Old Saybrook 75.4 2
5 14 Branford 73.6 3 Old Saybrook 71.9 3 Berlin 68.6 3 East Lyme 74.1 345 East Lyme 73.4 4 Bethel 71 4 Stonington 68.5 4 East Granby 73.6 484 Milford 69.3 5 Clinton 69.9 5 East Granby 66.7 5 Berlin 72.3 5
106 Old Saybrook 68.4 6 Branford 69.6 6 Newington 66.1 6 Cromwell 72.3 6152 Waterford 67.3 7 Stonington 68.9 7 North Haven 65.5 7 Rocky Hill 71.7 7
4 40 East Granby 67.2 8 New Milford 66.7 8 Old Saybrook 65.3 8 Newington 69.9 87 Berlin 66.5 9 East Hampton 66.1 9 Wallingford 65 9 Stonington 67.8 9
137 Stonington 65.8 10 Waterford 64.1 10 Clinton 64.6 10 Southington 67.6 10
42 East Hampton 65.6 11 Newington 63 11 Rocky Hill 64.6 11 Ledyard 66 11131 Southington 65.1 12 East Granby 62.2 12 Southington 62.8 12 Shelton 66 12
3 94 Newington 63.8 13 North Haven 60.7 13 Milford 62.4 13 North Haven 65.4 13 Median101 North Haven 63.6 14 Milford 60.4 14 Waterford 62.3 14 New Milford 64.7 14119 Rocky Hill 63.4 15 Cromwell 60.2 15 Ledyard 61.7 15 Waterford 63.7 15
148 Wallingford 63.4 16 Wallingford 60.2 16 Shelton 60.9 16 Branford 63.5 1633 Cromwell 61 17 Southington 59 17 Branford 60.8 17 Colchester 63.4 17
2 96 New Milford 60.4 18 Wethersfield 58.8 18 East Hampton 58.1 18 Milford 62.3 18126 Shelton 59.1 19 Shelton 58.7 19 Colchester 56.1 19 Wethersfield 59.9 19159 Wethersfield 58.8 20 Ledyard 58.1 20 Wethersfield 54.9 20 Wallingford 57.8 20
28 Colchester 54.8 21 Watertown 56.2 21 New Milford 52.9 21 East Hampton 56.1 210 State 54.4 22 Colchester 54.4 22 State 52.1 22 State 54.6 22
1 153 Watertown 54.3 23 Rocky Hill 53.2 23 Watertown 51.6 23 Clinton 54.6 23164 Windsor 53.6 24 State 52.3 24 Cromwell 51 24 Watertown 54.5 2472 Ledyard 50.7 25 Windsor 47.9 25 Windsor 38 25 Windsor 52.9 25
1
5
18 18
3
6
17
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2006 2007 2008 2009
DR
G D
Bra
nfo
rd R
an
k
YEARS
Branford 3rd Grade Reading CMT DRG D Rank 2006-2009
ScaleScoreRank
%GoalAboveRank
Branford Grd 3 Writing Scale Score DRG D Rank2006 2007 2008 2009
Grd 3 2006 Writing 2006 2007 Writing 2007 2008 Writing 2008 2009 Writing 2009QT Dist Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank
9 Bethel 272.2 1 East Lyme 275.8 1 Old Saybrook 276.7 1 Old Saybrook 285.8 140 East Granby 271 2 Old Saybrook 270.5 2 Newington 275.5 2 East Lyme 281.7 2
5 7 Berlin 270.6 3 New Milford 270.1 3 East Lyme 274.2 3 Bethel 278.8 342 East Hampton 270.4 4 Newington 267.8 4 Waterford 272.2 4 Cromwell 274.4 4137 Stonington 269.3 5 Berlin 267.6 5 Bethel 270.4 5 Milford 270.7 5
14 Branford 266 6 Bethel 266.4 6 Clinton 269.6 6 Newington 270.4 645 East Lyme 265.6 7 Stonington 266.2 7 East Hampton 269 7 East Granby 270 7
4 27 Clinton 264.4 8 Clinton 265.5 8 East Granby 268.8 8 Rocky Hill 269.3 8152 Waterford 264.4 9 East Hampton 265 9 Stonington 268 9 Stonington 269.1 9101 North Haven 263.8 10 Waterford 263.9 10 Shelton 266.6 10 Waterford 267.6 10
96 New Milford 262.7 11 Milford 263.1 11 Berlin 266.2 11 North Haven 267.4 11131 Southington 262.4 12 North Haven 261.9 12 Milford 265.5 12 Clinton 266.1 12
3 94 Newington 262.1 13 Watertown 260.7 13 Rocky Hill 264 13 Shelton 265.9 13 Median84 Milford 262 14 East Granby 260 14 North Haven 262.8 14 Southington 265.7 14106 Old Saybrook 262 15 Southington 258.6 15 Ledyard 260.4 15 Berlin 263.7 15
148 Wallingford 260.1 16 Ledyard 257.7 16 Colchester 260.2 16 New Milford 261.8 16126 Shelton 259.8 17 Cromwell 257.6 17 Southington 260.1 17 East Hampton 261.7 17
2 119 Rocky Hill 256.2 18 Shelton 256.2 18 Wallingford 260.1 18 Ledyard 260.7 18159 Wethersfield 255.8 19 Rocky Hill 255.4 19 New Milford 254.5 19 Branford 258.6 19153 Watertown 252.8 20 Branford 254.6 20 Branford 254.3 20 Wethersfield 256.7 20
72 Ledyard 252.6 21 Colchester 254.2 21 Wethersfield 254.2 21 Wallingford 254.6 210 State 251.2 22 Wethersfield 254 22 Cromwell 254 22 State 254.3 22
1 28 Colchester 250.2 23 Wallingford 253.5 23 State 253.3 23 Colchester 252.6 2333 Cromwell 246.1 24 State 252.2 24 Watertown 251.1 24 Windsor 248 24164 Windsor 241.5 25 Windsor 242.7 25 Windsor 245.6 25 Watertown 246.1 25
Branford Grd 3 Writing %Goal+ DRG D Rank
2006 2007 2008 2009Grd 3 2006 Writing 2006 2007 Writing 2007 2008 Writing 2008 2009 Writing 2009QT Dist. ID Group %Goal+ Rank Group %Goal+ Rank Group %Goal+ Rank Group %Goal+ Rank
40 East Granby 79.7 1 Old Saybrook 83.6 1 Newington 83.9 1 Old Saybrook 90.9 142 East Hampton 79.7 2 East Lyme 80.9 2 East Granby 82.5 2 Bethel 88.5 2
5 101 North Haven 78.9 3 New Milford 79.2 3 East Lyme 80.8 3 East Lyme 84.2 345 East Lyme 77.6 4 Berlin 78.3 4 Old Saybrook 80.6 4 Cromwell 79.4 49 Bethel 77.5 5 Clinton 77.9 5 Clinton 80.3 5 Rocky Hill 79.4 5
14 Branford 77.1 6 East Hampton 76 6 Berlin 80.2 6 East Granby 79.2 6131 Southington 75.9 7 Milford 74.4 7 East Hampton 79.5 7 North Haven 77.9 7
4 7 Berlin 75.2 8 Waterford 73.7 8 Rocky Hill 79.4 8 Newington 77.7 8126 Shelton 74.1 9 Stonington 72.6 9 Waterford 78.9 9 Waterford 76.3 9152 Waterford 73.6 10 Newington 72 10 Bethel 77.7 10 Milford 76 10148 Wallingford 72.7 11 North Haven 71.3 11 Shelton 76.6 11 Stonington 75.8 1184 Milford 72.6 12 East Granby 70.7 12 Milford 75.8 12 Berlin 75.3 12
3 137 Stonington 71.7 13 Bethel 70.6 13 North Haven 72.8 13 East Hampton 74.8 13 Median119 Rocky Hill 70.5 14 Southington 70.4 14 Stonington 72.5 14 New Milford 74.3 14106 Old Saybrook 70.4 15 Ledyard 66.8 15 Southington 71.7 15 Shelton 74.2 1596 New Milford 69.9 16 Watertown 66.7 16 Ledyard 71.1 16 Southington 73.4 1627 Clinton 69.6 17 Rocky Hill 66.4 17 Colchester 71 17 Clinton 71.2 17
2 94 Newington 67.7 18 Shelton 66.1 18 Wallingford 70.4 18 Ledyard 67.1 18153 Watertown 67.2 19 Cromwell 65.6 19 Wethersfield 66.8 19 Wethersfield 66.3 19159 Wethersfield 65.4 20 Colchester 64.1 20 New Milford 65.5 20 Wallingford 65.6 2072 Ledyard 61.7 21 Wallingford 63.7 21 State 63.5 21 Colchester 64.6 210 State 61.1 22 Wethersfield 63.1 22 Cromwell 63.1 22 Branford 63.3 22
1 28 Colchester 58.3 23 State 60.8 23 Branford 62 23 State 62.6 2333 Cromwell 53.4 24 Branford 59.9 24 Watertown 61.5 24 Windsor 54.1 24164 Windsor 50.6 25 Windsor 52.3 25 Windsor 53.8 25 Watertown 53.4 25
6
20 20
19
6
23
22 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2006 2007 2008 2009D
RG
D R
AN
K (
Bra
nfo
rd)
YEARS
Branford Rank in DRG D 3rd Grade Writing CMT 2006-2009
ScaleScoreRank
%GoalAboveRank
Branford Grd 3 Math Scale Score DRG D Rank
2006 2007 2008 2009Grd 3 2006 Math 2006 2007 Math 2007 2008 Math 2008 2009 Math 2009QT Dist Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank
9 Bethel 282.4 1 East Lyme 281.5 1 Bethel 283.9 1 Bethel 289.6 114 Branford 273.6 2 Berlin 278.2 2 Southington 282.7 2 Southington 286.5 2
5 131 Southington 272.5 3 Bethel 278.1 3 East Lyme 274.6 3 East Lyme 278.2 3152 Waterford 270.5 4 Southington 277.7 4 Waterford 269.7 4 Cromwell 277.3 445 East Lyme 268 5 New Milford 272.7 5 Ledyard 268.2 5 Old Saybrook 274.5 5
7 Berlin 266.6 6 Stonington 270.4 6 North Haven 267.3 6 Rocky Hill 273.9 627 Clinton 265 7 Branford 268.4 7 Berlin 267 7 Stonington 272.2 7
4 40 East Granby 263.9 8 East Granby 268.2 8 East Granby 267 8 Ledyard 271.9 884 Milford 263.7 9 Waterford 263.7 9 Stonington 265.9 9 Newington 271.8 9137 Stonington 263.7 10 East Hampton 263.1 10 Newington 265 10 Berlin 271.7 10
42 East Hampton 263.4 11 Milford 261.4 11 Rocky Hill 265 11 North Haven 271.7 11119 Rocky Hill 260.5 12 Newington 260.8 12 Wallingford 263.6 12 East Granby 270.1 12
3 96 New Milford 257.5 13 North Haven 260.5 13 East Hampton 263.2 13 East Hampton 268.6 13 Median101 North Haven 257.5 14 Clinton 260.3 14 Branford 259.3 14 Waterford 267.7 14106 Old Saybrook 257 15 Wallingford 257 15 Milford 258.7 15 Colchester 265.7 15
148 Wallingford 256.3 16 Wethersfield 257 16 Clinton 257.4 16 Milford 264.9 16126 Shelton 254.5 17 Old Saybrook 256.7 17 Wethersfield 256.9 17 New Milford 264.1 17
2 28 Colchester 253.9 18 Rocky Hill 255 18 Colchester 256.1 18 Wethersfield 263.5 1872 Ledyard 251.5 19 Colchester 254.5 19 Shelton 255.7 19 Shelton 263.2 19159 Wethersfield 250.6 20 Shelton 253.9 20 New Milford 255.5 20 Wallingford 261.2 20
94 Newington 249.9 21 Cromwell 252.6 21 Old Saybrook 254.1 21 Branford 258.1 210 State 248.9 22 State 252.2 22 State 252.7 22 State 256.7 22
1 164 Windsor 248.6 23 Watertown 250.7 23 Watertown 251.3 23 Clinton 254.4 2333 Cromwell 246.9 24 Ledyard 248.4 24 Cromwell 249.6 24 Watertown 250.1 24153 Watertown 245.1 25 Windsor 246 25 Windsor 233.4 25 Windsor 249.4 25
Branford Grd 3 Math %Goal+ DRG D Rank2006 2007 2008 2009
Grd 3 2006 Math 2006 2007 Math 2007 2008 Math 2008 2009 Math 2009QT Dist Group %Goal+ Rank Group %Goal+ Rank Group %Goal+ Rank Group %Goal+ Rank
9 Bethel 81 1 Southington 81.6 1 Bethel 84.1 1 Bethel 90.2 114 Branford 79.1 2 New Milford 80.4 2 Southington 83.8 2 Southington 85.1 2
5 45 East Lyme 76.1 3 Bethel 80.3 3 East Lyme 77.2 3 East Lyme 81.3 3131 Southington 76 4 Berlin 79.9 4 Waterford 75.8 4 North Haven 79.5 4
7 Berlin 74.4 5 East Lyme 79.2 5 North Haven 75.7 5 Cromwell 79.2 5
152 Waterford 73.7 6 Stonington 76.3 6 Berlin 72.7 6 Rocky Hill 78.4 684 Milford 72.9 7 East Granby 74.4 7 Ledyard 72 7 Old Saybrook 78.3 7
4 40 East Granby 71.9 8 Branford 73.1 8 Wallingford 71.5 8 East Granby 77.8 8137 Stonington 69.5 9 Milford 72 9 East Granby 71.4 9 Ledyard 77.1 927 Clinton 68.8 10 Waterford 71.4 10 Stonington 70.8 10 Berlin 75.6 10
119 Rocky Hill 68.3 11 Old Saybrook 69.5 11 Rocky Hill 69.8 11 Stonington 75.4 11106 Old Saybrook 67 12 Clinton 69.3 12 Clinton 67.3 12 Waterford 74.2 12
3 42 East Hampton 65 13 East Hampton 68.3 13 East Hampton 67.1 13 Newington 74 13 Median96 New Milford 63.1 14 North Haven 68.1 14 Newington 66.1 14 Colchester 72.5 14101 North Haven 62.4 15 Newington 67.1 15 Milford 65.8 15 East Hampton 72 15
148 Wallingford 62 16 Wethersfield 64 16 Colchester 64.5 16 Milford 71.9 16126 Shelton 61.7 17 Wallingford 62 17 Watertown 63.9 17 New Milford 70.8 17
2 28 Colchester 60.5 18 Colchester 61.9 18 Shelton 63.5 18 Wallingford 70.5 18159 Wethersfield 59.4 19 Shelton 60.8 19 New Milford 63.1 19 Shelton 68.4 1972 Ledyard 58.6 20 Rocky Hill 60.7 20 Branford 63 20 Wethersfield 67.1 20
94 Newington 58.6 21 Watertown 60.7 21 Wethersfield 61.3 21 State 63 210 State 56.3 22 Ledyard 59.6 22 State 60.2 22 Branford 62.9 22
1 153 Watertown 55.5 23 State 59.4 23 Cromwell 57.6 23 Clinton 62.1 23164 Windsor 52.7 24 Cromwell 59 24 Old Saybrook 54.7 24 Watertown 62.1 2433 Cromwell 52.2 25 Windsor 50.8 25 Windsor 44.6 25 Windsor 58.2 25
2
7
14
21
2
8
20
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2006 2007 2008 2009B
ran
ford
DR
G D
Ran
k
YEARS
Branford 3rd Grade Math CMT DRG D Rank 2006-2009
ScaleScoreRank
%GoalAboveRank
Branford Grd 4 Reading Scale Score DRG D RankGrd 4 2006 Reading 2006 2007 Reading 2007 2008 Reading 2008 2009 Reading 2009QT DistID Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank
45 East Lyme 269.9 1 East Lyme 270.9 1 East Lyme 276.1 1 East Lyme 274.5 127 Clinton 264.6 2 Bethel 269.3 2 Berlin 266.1 2 Bethel 270.5 2
5 9 Bethel 264.5 3 Berlin 265.4 3 Branford 262.8 3 Rocky Hill 270.4 37 Berlin 263.1 4 Branford 264 4 Bethel 261.9 4 Berlin 268.6 4
106 Old Saybrook 261 5 Wethersfield 262 5 Wethersfield 261.9 5 Southington 268.2 5
14 Branford 260.4 6 Clinton 261 6 Old Saybrook 260.4 6 Stonington 267.9 694 Newington 260.2 7 Rocky Hill 260.5 7 Colchester 259.2 7 Newington 267.2 7
4 152 Waterford 260.1 8 Waterford 260.4 8 Rocky Hill 259.1 8 East Granby 267 8131 Southington 259.7 9 Old Saybrook 259.3 9 Watertown 258.7 9 Colchester 265.3 9119 Rocky Hill 258.7 10 Southington 259.1 10 Stonington 257.3 10 Ledyard 264.8 10
84 Milford 258.4 11 Milford 259 11 New Milford 257.1 11 Wallingford 264.5 11137 Stonington 258.2 12 East Hampton 257.9 12 Milford 256.6 12 Waterford 263.2 12
3 148 Wallingford 257.2 13 East Granby 257.8 13 Southington 255.6 13 Wethersfield 262.3 13 Median33 Cromwell 256.6 14 Shelton 257.6 14 Ledyard 255.5 14 Shelton 262.2 14126 Shelton 256.2 15 Wallingford 256 15 Waterford 255.5 15 Old Saybrook 262 15
159 Wethersfield 256.1 16 Colchester 255.4 16 East Granby 255.3 16 Milford 261.4 1672 Ledyard 255.5 17 Stonington 255.2 17 Clinton 254.8 17 East Hampton 261 17
2 101 North Haven 255.5 18 Newington 253.1 18 Newington 254.6 18 North Haven 259.5 1828 Colchester 254.7 19 Watertown 253 19 East Hampton 254 19 Clinton 259.4 1940 East Granby 254.4 20 New Milford 252.5 20 North Haven 253.8 20 Branford 258.7 20
42 East Hampton 253.5 21 Ledyard 252.4 21 Cromwell 253.6 21 Cromwell 256.9 2196 New Milford 252.1 22 Cromwell 251.8 22 Shelton 253.3 22 Watertown 255.4 22
1 0 State 249.9 23 North Haven 251.5 23 Wallingford 252.7 23 State 254.8 23153 Watertown 249.9 24 State 248.7 24 State 248.7 24 New Milford 254 24164 Windsor 246.6 25 Windsor 248 25 Windsor 243.9 25 Windsor 249.5 25
Branford Grd 4 Reading %Goal+ DRG D Rank
Grd 4 2006 Reading 2006 2007 Reading 2007 2008 Reading 2008 2009 Reading 2009QT DistID Group % Goal Rank Group % Goal Rank Group % Goal Rank Group % Goal Rank
45 East Lyme 77.9 1 East Lyme 78.6 1 East Lyme 81 1 Bethel 82.3 17 Berlin 77.6 2 Berlin 77.4 2 Berlin 74.5 2 East Lyme 80.6 2
5 14 Branford 72.9 3 Bethel 73.8 3 Branford 71.8 3 Berlin 75.6 39 Bethel 71.3 4 Rocky Hill 73.4 4 Wethersfield 69.5 4 Stonington 75 4
106 Old Saybrook 71.1 5 Wethersfield 72.3 5 Colchester 68.6 5 East Granby 74.6 5
131 Southington 70.3 6 Clinton 70.1 6 Bethel 68.2 6 Southington 74.6 628 Colchester 67.8 7 Waterford 69.8 7 Old Saybrook 68.2 7 Rocky Hill 74.4 7
4 27 Clinton 67.1 8 Branford 69.7 8 Watertown 67 8 Colchester 73.3 894 Newington 66.3 9 East Granby 68.3 9 Southington 66.3 9 Waterford 73.1 984 Milford 66.2 10 Southington 68 10 Ledyard 65.2 10 Wallingford 72.3 10
137 Stonington 65.5 11 Milford 67.7 11 Rocky Hill 65.2 11 Shelton 68.6 1196 New Milford 64.9 12 East Hampton 67.1 12 East Hampton 64.5 12 Newington 68.4 12
3 33 Cromwell 64.8 13 Shelton 65.4 13 Waterford 64.5 13 Ledyard 68 13 Median148 Wallingford 64.5 14 Old Saybrook 64.7 14 Newington 64.2 14 Cromwell 67.9 14101 North Haven 64.3 15 Newington 64.3 15 Milford 63.5 15 Milford 67.9 15
152 Waterford 63.8 16 Wallingford 64 16 Stonington 63.4 16 Wethersfield 67.7 16126 Shelton 63.6 17 Colchester 63.9 17 East Granby 63.3 17 Clinton 67.6 17
2 72 Ledyard 63.1 18 North Haven 63.2 18 North Haven 63 18 Old Saybrook 65.6 18119 Rocky Hill 62.9 19 New Milford 62.6 19 Clinton 62 19 North Haven 65.3 19159 Wethersfield 61.8 20 Cromwell 61.8 20 Cromwell 61.7 20 East Hampton 64.8 20
42 East Hampton 60.4 21 Watertown 61.5 21 New Milford 61.2 21 Branford 64.3 2140 East Granby 59.2 22 Stonington 60.8 22 Shelton 60 22 Watertown 62.7 22
1 153 Watertown 59 23 Ledyard 58.8 23 Wallingford 58.2 23 State 60.7 230 State 57.8 24 State 57 24 State 56 24 New Milford 57.1 24
164 Windsor 52.8 25 Windsor 53 25 Windsor 47.3 25 Windsor 56.4 25
6
4
3
20
3
8
3
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2006 2007 2008 2009
RA
NK
YEARS
Branford 4th Grade Reading DRG D Ranking 2006-2009
ScaleScoreRank
%GoalAboveRank
Branford Grd 4 Writing Scale Score DRG D Rank2006 2007 2008 2009
Grd 4 2006 Writing 2006 2007 Writing 2007 2008 Writing 2008 2009 Writing 2009QT Dist Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank
9 Bethel 267.4 1 Old Saybrook 270.1 1 Bethel 273.9 1 East Lyme 281.7 1106 Old Saybrook 264.4 2 Bethel 269.9 2 East Lyme 272.7 2 East Granby 276.7 2
5 45 East Lyme 263.8 3 East Lyme 268 3 Berlin 266.9 3 Bethel 272.8 3152 Waterford 262.5 4 Branford 267.2 4 Waterford 266.9 4 Waterford 268.4 4101 North Haven 262.1 5 Berlin 266 5 Branford 266.3 5 Newington 268.3 5
94 Newington 261.5 6 Rocky Hill 265.7 6 Newington 265.4 6 Southington 268.2 6131 Southington 261.3 7 Wethersfield 265.1 7 Old Saybrook 264.8 7 Old Saybrook 268 7
4 33 Cromwell 259.3 8 New Milford 262.7 8 Ledyard 264.7 8 Colchester 266.8 87 Berlin 258.5 9 Southington 262.3 9 Watertown 264.2 9 North Haven 266.3 9
126 Shelton 257.7 10 Shelton 261.6 10 Colchester 264 10 Ledyard 262.8 10
84 Milford 256.2 11 Newington 261.6 11 North Haven 263.6 11 Berlin 262.3 1196 New Milford 256.2 12 Clinton 261.1 12 Southington 262.3 12 Stonington 262.2 12
3 119 Rocky Hill 253.9 13 Waterford 260.6 13 East Granby 262.2 13 Rocky Hill 262.1 13 Median27 Clinton 253.5 14 North Haven 260.2 14 Wethersfield 261.8 14 Shelton 261.4 14
153 Watertown 253.4 15 Wallingford 259.8 15 New Milford 260.8 15 Milford 259.1 15
40 East Granby 253.3 16 Stonington 259.4 16 Cromwell 259.7 16 Watertown 258.1 16137 Stonington 252.2 17 Milford 258.7 17 Milford 258.9 17 East Hampton 257.7 17
2 14 Branford 251.7 18 East Hampton 258.7 18 Stonington 258 18 Wethersfield 256.9 18148 Wallingford 251.4 19 East Granby 257.7 19 Rocky Hill 256.9 19 Wallingford 256.8 19
72 Ledyard 251.3 20 Watertown 257.5 20 Clinton 254.5 20 New Milford 256.3 20
159 Wethersfield 250.9 21 Colchester 254.9 21 Shelton 254.3 21 Clinton 256.1 21164 Windsor 250.8 22 Windsor 253.6 22 Wallingford 253.4 22 Branford 253.8 22
1 0 State 250.1 23 Cromwell 253.3 23 State 253.1 23 State 253.3 2328 Colchester 249.8 24 State 252.8 24 East Hampton 250.3 24 Cromwell 249.8 2442 East Hampton 245.1 25 Ledyard 247.4 25 Windsor 243.3 25 Windsor 247.8 25
Branford Grd 4 Writing %Goal+ DRG D Rank2006 2007 2008 2009
Grd 4 2006 Writing 2006 2007 Writing 2007 2008 Writing 2008 2009 Writing 2009QT Dist Group MeanGoal Rank Group MeanGoal Rank Group MeanGoal Rank Group MeanGoal Rank
9 Bethel 77.9 1 Berlin 80.4 1 East Lyme 83.2 1 East Lyme 85.4 145 East Lyme 76.9 2 Wethersfield 80.4 2 Berlin 80.5 2 East Granby 81.3 2
1 7 Berlin 75.6 3 East Lyme 79.7 3 Bethel 79.2 3 Bethel 81.3 3106 Old Saybrook 75.2 4 Southington 79.3 4 Watertown 77.8 4 Southington 78.6 4152 Waterford 75.1 5 Bethel 78.8 5 Old Saybrook 76.9 5 Waterford 77.1 5
101 North Haven 74.4 6 Rocky Hill 78.7 6 North Haven 75.1 6 Berlin 77 694 Newington 73.7 7 Wallingford 77.9 7 Colchester 75 7 Rocky Hill 77 7
2 40 East Granby 73.7 8 Old Saybrook 77.3 8 Newington 74.8 8 Newington 76.6 814 Branford 73.3 9 Branford 74.9 9 Wethersfield 74.2 9 North Haven 76.4 996 New Milford 72.6 10 Shelton 74.9 10 Southington 73.5 10 Colchester 75.7 10
131 Southington 72.4 11 Clinton 73.7 11 Rocky Hill 73.5 11 Shelton 75 1184 Milford 71.7 12 East Hampton 73.7 12 Branford 73.4 12 Ledyard 73.7 12
3 33 Cromwell 71.5 13 East Granby 73.3 13 Waterford 72.9 13 Stonington 73.7 13 Median153 Watertown 70.3 14 North Haven 73.2 14 Cromwell 72.2 14 Old Saybrook 72.9 14126 Shelton 70 15 Newington 72.8 15 Milford 71.7 15 Watertown 72.5 15
119 Rocky Hill 69.5 16 Waterford 72 16 Ledyard 71.3 16 Milford 71.9 1672 Ledyard 66.9 17 New Milford 71.4 17 New Milford 69.2 17 East Hampton 71.8 17
4 137 Stonington 66.7 18 Milford 71.2 18 East Granby 68.4 18 Wallingford 70.5 18148 Wallingford 66.7 19 Watertown 70.7 19 Wallingford 68.1 19 Wethersfield 69.9 1927 Clinton 66.5 20 Colchester 68.7 20 Stonington 67.4 20 Clinton 69.1 20
159 Wethersfield 64 21 Stonington 67.6 21 Shelton 65.7 21 New Milford 66.9 210 State 62.8 22 Cromwell 67.1 22 State 62.9 22 State 64.2 22
5 164 Windsor 61.2 23 State 65.1 23 East Hampton 62.6 23 Branford 63.9 2328 Colchester 60.4 24 Windsor 63.9 24 Clinton 62 24 Cromwell 58.1 2442 East Hampton 59.5 25 Ledyard 61.3 25 Windsor 53.2 25 Windsor 58.1 25
18
4
5
22
9 9
12
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2006 2007 2008 2009R
AN
KYEARS
4th Grade Writing DRG D Ranking 2006-2009
ScaleScoreRank
Rank%GoalAbove
Branford Grd 4 Math Scale Score DRG D Rank
Grd 4 2006 MATH 2006 2007 MATH 2007 2008 Math 2008 2009 Math 2009QT Dist Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank Group MeanSS Rank
131 Southington 277 1 Southington 287.3 1 East Lyme 291.6 1 Southington 297.8 19 Bethel 274.1 2 Bethel 281 2 Southington 287.3 2 Bethel 290.3 2
5 152 Waterford 272.3 3 East Lyme 275.8 3 Bethel 282.6 3 East Lyme 288.1 3
14 Branford 268.1 4 Berlin 274.2 4 Colchester 274.1 4 Rocky Hill 282.6 445 East Lyme 267.4 5 Branford 272.2 5 Berlin 272.9 5 Berlin 278 5
7 Berlin 267.2 6 East Granby 270.5 6 East Granby 272.7 6 Ledyard 275.2 640 East Granby 266.7 7 Waterford 270.4 7 Wethersfield 269.5 7 Newington 275 7
4 84 Milford 264.7 8 Clinton 268.3 8 Ledyard 268.9 8 Colchester 273.3 872 Ledyard 262.7 9 Wethersfield 267 9 Rocky Hill 267.5 9 Stonington 271.4 927 Clinton 262.5 10 Colchester 266.6 10 Newington 264.6 10 Wethersfield 271.3 10
94 Newington 259.9 11 Rocky Hill 266.6 11 Waterford 263.9 11 East Granby 270.8 11126 Shelton 259.1 12 Milford 265.2 12 Stonington 263.3 12 North Haven 270 12
3 119 Rocky Hill 257.6 13 Ledyard 261.4 13 Branford 263.1 13 Old Saybrook 269.5 13 Median101 North Haven 257.4 14 Wallingford 261.2 14 Milford 262.7 14 Waterford 269.3 1433 Cromwell 256.2 15 Old Saybrook 261.1 15 Wallingford 260.9 15 Wallingford 266.2 15
148 Wallingford 256.2 16 Newington 259.7 16 Cromwell 258.4 16 Shelton 265.3 16159 Wethersfield 255.8 17 Shelton 259.6 17 State 258.1 17 East Hampton 264.5 17
2 137 Stonington 255.7 18 Stonington 257.9 18 Old Saybrook 258 18 Milford 263.9 1828 Colchester 255 19 State 256.9 19 North Haven 257.5 19 State 262.8 19
106 Old Saybrook 253.1 20 North Haven 255.9 20 New Milford 256.9 20 Clinton 259.8 20
0 State 252.6 21 Cromwell 253.9 21 Clinton 256.3 21 Branford 258.6 2142 East Hampton 249.7 22 Watertown 252 22 Shelton 256.2 22 Watertown 258 22
1 96 New Milford 248.8 23 New Milford 251.4 23 Watertown 254.6 23 Cromwell 254.9 23153 Watertown 246.9 24 East Hampton 251 24 Windsor 254.2 24 Windsor 252.3 24164 Windsor 246.1 25 Windsor 249.3 25 East Hampton 251.3 25 New Milford 247.6 25
Branford Grd 4 Math %Goal+ DRG D RankGrd 4 2006 Math 2006 2007 Math 2007 2008 Math 2008 2009 Math 2009QT Dist Group % Goal Rank Group % Goal Rank Group % Goal Rank Group % Goal Rank
131 Southington 80.3 1 Southington 84.6 1 Southington 82.4 1 Southington 90.2 19 Bethel 79.2 2 Berlin 83.1 2 Bethel 81.6 2 Bethel 83.5 2
5 7 Berlin 77.6 3 Bethel 82.7 3 East Lyme 81 3 Berlin 80.6 3152 Waterford 77 4 East Lyme 80.2 4 Berlin 77.3 4 East Lyme 79.9 4
14 Branford 74.7 5 Rocky Hill 78.2 5 Colchester 76.7 5 Rocky Hill 79.5 5
40 East Granby 72.4 6 Clinton 75.4 6 East Granby 72.2 6 Colchester 75.1 684 Milford 70.9 7 Branford 73.7 7 Wethersfield 71.9 7 Ledyard 73.9 7
4 45 East Lyme 69.7 8 East Granby 73.3 8 Milford 69 8 Newington 73.8 872 Ledyard 68 9 Colchester 73.1 9 Branford 68.7 9 East Granby 73 927 Clinton 67.1 10 Waterford 71.6 10 Waterford 68.4 10 Stonington 72.2 10
126 Shelton 66.7 11 Wethersfield 70.9 11 Rocky Hill 68.3 11 North Haven 71.7 11101 North Haven 64.7 12 Wallingford 70.3 12 Ledyard 68.1 12 East Hampton 71.1 12
3 94 Newington 64.5 13 Milford 70 13 Newington 67.8 13 Old Saybrook 71 13 Median159 Wethersfield 64.4 14 Ledyard 69.4 14 Stonington 65.5 14 Waterford 70.8 14148 Wallingford 63.6 15 Old Saybrook 68.9 15 Cromwell 63 15 Wethersfield 70.8 15
119 Rocky Hill 63.5 16 Shelton 65 16 Clinton 62.7 16 Shelton 70.6 1633 Cromwell 62.3 17 Stonington 64.5 17 New Milford 62.6 17 Wallingford 68.2 17
2 28 Colchester 60.8 18 Cromwell 63.9 18 North Haven 62.6 18 Milford 64.1 18137 Stonington 60.2 19 Newington 63.6 19 Old Saybrook 62.6 19 State 63.8 1942 East Hampton 59.7 20 State 62.3 20 Wallingford 61.4 20 Clinton 62.2 20
0 State 58.8 21 North Haven 61.9 21 Watertown 61.1 21 Watertown 60.2 21106 Old Saybrook 58.7 22 Watertown 60.4 22 State 60.5 22 Cromwell 60 22
1 96 New Milford 57 23 New Milford 58.6 23 East Hampton 60.3 23 Branford 59.2 23164 Windsor 52.7 24 Windsor 53.1 24 Shelton 60.2 24 Windsor 55.7 24153 Watertown 49 25 East Hampton 51.5 25 Windsor 57.3 25 New Milford 50.5 25
4
5
13
20
5
7
9
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2006 2007 2008 2009
RA
NK
YEARS
Branford 4th Grade Math DRG D Ranking 2006-2009
ScaleScoreRank
%GoalAboveRank
Numerical Tabular Data may have hidden in the rows and columns valuable information that sometimes remains “in the shadows.” Data
displayed in a variety of graphical modalities may add clarity by showing the Data On The Surface
(DOTS). The responsibility of the reader becomes one of connecting the DOTS.
Great care was taken to assure the accuracy of the displayed data. Considering the amount of
data and the different display formats, some error may be present and as of yet unidentified. If so, the author apologizes for the inaccuracy and will make an attempt to correct the data as soon as
possible.
All data used is available by following this link http://www.Branford.k12.ct.us and then choosing
the second link from the bottom of the left-hand column’s list of links (http://www.ctreports.com/)