bioretention site evaluation and considerations for design
TRANSCRIPT
Site Evaluation and Considerations for Design and Review of Bioretention
Jay Dorsey & John MathewsODNR-DSWRApril 16, 2014
Goals for PresentationUnderstanding Why Bioretention Practices
Fail Site Considerations
Right BMP? Site Limitations Site Properties for Design
Giving Bioretention Practices the Best Chance to Function Over the Long Haul
Why Do Bioretention Practices Fail?Undersized Bioretention Cell Based on Overestimate of Infiltration Capacity
Why Do Bioretention Practices Fail?Undersized Bioretention Cell Based on Overestimate of Infiltration Capacity
Why Do Bioretention Practices Fail?Undersized Bioretention Cell Based on Overestimate of Infiltration Capacity
Sediment Clogging of Geotextile Filter Between Soil and Aggregate Layers
Why Do Bioretention Practices Fail?Undersized Bioretention Cell Based on Overestimate of Infiltration Capacity
Sediment Clogging of Geotextile Filter Between Soil and Aggregate Layers
Why Do Bioretention Practices Fail?1. Sediment Clogging of Filter Bed Surface2. Eroding Sideslopes - Unstable Sideslopes
and/or Concentrated Flow
Why Do Bioretention Practices Fail?1. Sediment Clogging of Filter Bed Surface2. Eroding Sideslopes3. Undersized Surface Ponding Volume
Results: Storage VolumeNeed to inspect average ponding
depth (not height of outlet structure)
Source: Brad Wardynski, NCSU-BAE
Why Do Bioretention Practices Fail?1. Sediment Clogging of Filter Bed Surface2. Eroding Sideslopes3. Undersized Surface Ponding Volume4. Construction Issues/Lack of Construction
Oversight
Construction Issues/Lack of Construction Oversight
Loss of Exfiltration/Infiltration Capacity smearing or compaction of subgrade soils during
excavation compaction of filter bed soils during construction
Construction Issues/Lack of Construction Oversight
Loss of Exfiltration/Infiltration Capacity smearing or compaction of subgrade soils during
excavation compaction of filter bed soils during construction
Materials – esp. filter sand and planting media
Construction Issues/Lack of Construction Oversight
Loss of Exfiltration/Infiltration Capacity smearing or compaction of subgrade soils during
excavation compaction of filter bed soils during construction
Materials – esp. filter sand and planting media Elevations – filter bed surface, overflow
Construction Issues/Lack of Construction Oversight
Loss of Exfiltration/Infiltration Capacity smearing or compaction of subgrade soils during
excavation compaction of filter bed soils during construction
Materials – esp. filter sand and planting media Elevations – filter bed surface, overflow Existing or Hidden Infrastructure
Construction Issues/Lack of Construction Oversight
Loss of Exfiltration/Infiltration Capacity smearing or compaction of subgrade soils during
excavation compaction of filter bed soils during construction
Materials – esp. filter sand and planting media Elevations – filter bed surface, overflow Existing or Hidden Infrastructure Keeping Sediment Out of BRC During
Construction – staging, site drainage and erosion control during construction, site stabilization
Why Do Bioretention Practices Fail?1. Sediment Clogging of Filter Bed Surface2. Eroding Sideslopes3. Undersized Surface Ponding Volume4. Construction Issues/Lack of Construction
Oversight5. Plant Selection and Management
Plant Selection and Management
Poor plant selection based on survivability – extremely droughty, extended ponding, salt
Poor plant selection based on fit for location – aesthetics, safety, maintainability
Inappropriate or inadequate post-construction management
Plant Selection and Management- Resources -
Horticulturalist or Landscape Architect (esp. ones with stormwater background)
Local Rain Garden Alliance (e.g. CincyRain.org)
Rain Garden and Stormwater Plant Guides
Why Do Bioretention Practices Fail?1. Sediment Clogging of Filter Bed Surface2. Eroding Sideslopes3. Undersized Surface Ponding Volume4. Construction Issues/Lack of Construction
Oversight5. Plant Selection and Management6. Lack of Maintenance
Why Do Bioretention Practices Fail?1. Sediment Clogging of Filter Bed Surface2. Eroding Sideslopes3. Undersized Surface Ponding Volume4. Construction Issues/Lack of Construction
Oversight5. Plant Selection and Management6. Lack of Maintenance7. Bioretention BMP or Design Poor Fit for
Site
Planning ConsiderationsDrainage Area < 2 Acres Existing Infrastructure Setbacks from Property Lines, Building
Foundations, Wells, Septic Systems
Planning ConsiderationsDrainage Area < 2 Acres Existing Infrastructure Setbacks from Property Lines, Building
Foundations, Wells, Septic Systems
Commitment/Resources to Maintain Practice
Site EvaluationGroundwater Pollution Concerns
Karst or Shallow Sand/Gravel Aquifer Areas Shallow Depth to Bedrock Shallow Depth to Water Table
2 ft separation recommended, 1 ft required
Site EvaluationGroundwater Pollution Concerns
Karst or Shallow Sand/Gravel Aquifer Areas Shallow Depth to Bedrock Shallow Depth to Water Table
2 ft separation recommended, 1 ft required Soil Limitations/Hydrologic Soil Group
(HSG)
Planning and Design Considerations HSG Shorthand
HSG-A • Shallow aquifer? • Avoid short circuiting from pollutant “hot spots”
HSG-B• Easy to work with• Maintain infiltration capacity of soils• Drainage usually recommended
HSG-C • Oftentimes in optimal landscape position• Maintain infiltration capacity of soils• Drainage required
HSG-D• Must identify limitations and design accordingly• Drainage required
Site EvaluationGroundwater Pollution Concerns
Karst or Shallow Sand/Gravel Aquifer Areas Shallow Depth to Bedrock Shallow Depth to Water Table
2 ft separation recommended, 1 ft required Soil Infiltration Capacity
P
Qoverflow
ET
S2
F1
P – Precipitation (Rainfall & Snowmelt)
ET – Evaporation & Transpiration
S1 – Temporary Surface Storage
S2 – Temporary Subsurface Storage
S1
F2
Qin
Qin-leak
Qout-leak
Qout
F1 – Infiltration
F2 – Exfiltration
Qin – Runon/Lateral Inflow
Qout - Runoff
Qtile
BMP Hydrology
Infiltration Test for BMP Design?Bore Hole/ Perc Test (v1)?
Ponded RingInfiltrometer Test
3-Dimensional Flow
~1-Dimensional Flow
Subgrade USDASoil Texture
ClayContent
%
Ksat(in/hr)
Sand < 8 2.8
Loamy Sand < 15 2.0
Sandy Loam < 20 0.80
Loam 7 – 27 0.16
Silt Loam < 27 0.05
Silt < 12 0.05
Sandy Clay Loam 20 – 35 0.07
Clay Loam 27 – 40 0.02
Silty Clay Loam 27 – 40 0.02
Silty Clay 40 – 50 0.01
Sandy Clay 35 – 55 <0.005
Clay > 40 <0.005
Subgrade Kfs Estimates
Pretreatment RealitiesFor the bioretention practice to function:1. The system must remove most sediment
from runoff before it enters the filter bed area The bioretention “system” necessarily includes
pretreatment components2. The runoff must be introduced to the filter
bed area with little or no erosive energy The design must address elevation change
and concentrated flow
Pretreatment Requirements Some form of pretreatment is required
Grass Filter Strip Gravel Verge plus Grass Filter Strip Grass Swale Sediment Forebay
References ODNR. Rainwater and Land Development Manual. Wardynski and Hunt. 2012. Are Bioretention Cells Being
Installed per Design Standards in North Carolina? A Field Assessment. J. Env. Eng. 138(12): 1210-1217.
Hunt, Davis, and Traver. 2012. Meeting Hydrologic and Water Quality Goals through Targeted BioretentionDesign. J. Env. Eng. 138(6): 698-707.
Brown, Hunt, and Kennedy. 2009. Designing Bioretention with an Internal Water Storage (IWS) Layer. NCSU-CE.
CWP. 2012. West Virginia Stormwater Management and Design Guidance Manual.