biomass as a renewable energy source - ufto home page · biomass as a renewable energy source ufto...

25
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source UFTO Visit Richard L. Bain May 8, 2002 Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Midwest Research Institute •Battelle • Bechtel Sustained Growth LS-CD-b136501 1880 1860 1500 0 3000 4500 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 Surprise Geothermal Solar New Biomass Wind Nuclear Hydro Gas Oil & NGL Coal Traditional Biomass E x a jou le s

Upload: dinhdieu

Post on 08-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source

UFTO Visit

Richard L. Bain

May 8, 2002

Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel

Sustained Growth

LS-CD-b136501

18801860

1500

0

1000

1500

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060

Surprise

Geothermal

Solar

New Biomass

Wind

NuclearHydroGas

Oil & NGL

CoalTraditional

Biomass

Exaj

oule

s

Sustained Growth

LS-CD-b136501

18801860

1500

0

3000

4500

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060

Surprise

Geothermal

Solar

New Biomass

Wind

NuclearHydroGas

Oil & NGL

CoalTraditional

Biomass

Exaj

oule

s

Carbon Dioxide - The Biosphereand the Earth's Atmosphere

310

320

330

340

350

360

370

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Year

CO

Con

cent

r atio

n(p

pmv)

2

Note: Data taken from observations at the Mauna Loa Observatory

The World Needs Low-Cost Energy

0.1

1

10

100

0.1 1 10 100 1000

Energy Consumption Per Capita (GJ/person)

GD

P P

er C

apita

($

000/

pers

on)

Poverty

Affluence

Ethiopia

United Kingdom

Mexico

Bangladesh

China

Poland

South Korea

United StatesFranceJapan

Source: Energy Information Administration, International Energy Annual 1998 Tables E1, B1, B2; Mike Grillot, 5/17/00Gross Domestic Product per capita is for 1997 in 1990 dollars. Energy Consumption per capita is 1997.

El Salvador Russia

Solar 1%

ConventionalHydropower

46%

Geothermal 4%

Biomass 48%

Wind 1%

RenewableEnergy

8%

Coal22%

Nuclear ElectricPower

8%

Natural Gas23%

Petroleum39%

U.S. Primary Energy Consumption, 1999

Renewable Energy 7.37 Quads

Source: EIA Annual Energy Review 1999

All Sources 96.60 Quads

Why Biomass?

• Environmentally low impact• National Security – less imported fuel • Increased diversity of energy supply • Greater social and technological flexibility • Strong public support• Significant job creation potential, especially in

rural areas

“Renewable energy development is at a crossroads… . The momentum for Renewables has never been greater, despite the factthat energy prices are low and there are few immediate energy concerns.”The Evolving Renewable Energy Market, IEA 1999

“Renewable energy development is at a crossroads… . The momentum for Renewables has never been greater, despite the factthat energy prices are low and there are few immediate energy concerns.”The Evolving Renewable Energy Market, IEA 1999

Bioenergy

U.S. Renewable Energy ResourcesWindSolar

Biomass Geothermal

Agricultural resources

Wood resources

Agricultural and

Low inventory

residues

and residues

wood residues

Temperature <90CTemperature >90CGeopressured resources

o

o

10

10

12

12

14

14

16

16

18

1820

20

2224

26

22 2426

16

14

14

1614

12

10

10

12 <10 10-12 12-1414-1616-18 18-2020-2222-24 24-26 26-28 >28

6.0-6.5 m/s13.4-14.6 mph

6.5-70 m/s14.6-15.7 mph

>7.0 m/s15.7+ mph

Megajoules/m2

U.S. Bioenergy 2000

Primary Bioenergy3.1 quads

Industrial/CHP & ElectricityResidential/HeatTransportationElectricity/ResidueHeat/Waste

Delivered Bioenergy1.5 quads

Industrial/CHP &Electricity

Residential/Heat

Transportation/Ethanol

Electricity/Residue

Heat/Waste

3% of U.S. Primary Energy

Examples of Bioenergy andExamples of Bioenergy and BiobasedBiobased Products FacilitiesProducts Facilities

ConversionProcesses

BiomassBiomassFeedstockFeedstock– Trees– Grasses– Agricultural Crops– Agricultural Residues– Animal Wastes– Municipal Solid Waste

USESUSES

Fuels:EthanolRenewable Diesel

Electricity

Heat

Chemicals– Plastics– Solvents– Pharmaceuticals– Chemical Intermediates– Phenolics– Adhesives– Furfural– Fatty acids– Acetic Acid– Carbon black– Paints– Dyes, Pigments, and Ink– Detergents– Etc.

Food and Feed

- Enzymatic Fermentation- Gas/liquid Fermentation- Acid Hydrolysis/Fermentation- Gasification- Combustion- Co-firing- … ..

Fuels, Chemicals, Materials, Heat and Power from Biomass

Petroleum and Natural

Gas Feedstocks

Petrochemical Refinery Producing Fuels and Chemical

Intermediates

Fuels – gasoline and diesel

Polymer intermediates –

ethylene, propylene, butadiene

Chemicals –methanol,

benzene, etc

Consumer

Commodities ProductionAntifreeze, packaging, tanks, boat hulls, fuel

oxygenates, additives, paints, fabric, fibers, etc.

Petrochemical Refining

Upstream Processsing

Downstream Processing

Pyrolysis

Gasification

Biochemical Conversion

Direct Products & Materials

Thermochemical

Biological

BioRefinery Operations

Commodity Products (electricity,

fuels, chemicals, materials)

Feedstock development

Upstream Processsing

Downstream Processing

Fischer-Tropschproduct slate

Methanol

Ethanol

Power-Heat

Hydrogen

Chemicals, fuels, adhesives, hydrogen

Biofuels

Chemicals

Specialty Products: polymers, enzymes

Direct Products & Intermediates

Integrated BioRefinery Concept

Residues

Pre

trea

tmen

t

Chemical Conversion

Thermochemical

BioRefinery Operation

Commodity Products (electricity, paper, chemicals, inks, dyes, & binders for asphalt)

Managed, Private Forests

Upstream Processsing

Downstream Processing

Pulp

Power-Heat

Lignosulfonates

Tall Oils

Resins

Direct Products & Intermediates

Integrating BioRefinery Unit Operations An authentic example with an analytic basis

Pulp and Paper Kraft Mill

Black Liquor stream

Biological (chemical) Conversion

Thermochem & Enzymatic Pretreatment/Fractionation

BioRefinery Operation

Commodity Products (feed, food ingredients, starch products for industrial uses, fiber, & fuel ethanol, etc, )

Cultivated Crops

Upstream Processsing

Downstream Processing

Animal Feed

Starch

Cogeneration

Ethanol

Citric Acid

Lactic to Polylactic Acid

Direct Products & Intermediates

Integrating BioRefinery Unit OperationsAn authentic example with an analytic basis

Corn Wet Mill (Soybean Mill)

Starch stream

The output below varies among corn wet mills

Ethanol and BioethanolEthanol, available in motor fuels today, is made from the starch in corn kernels — a valuable food product — in the same way ethanol has been made for millennia

Bioethanol, not yet on the market, is made from less valuable biomass —cellulose in corn stalks, rice straw, waste newspapers, and many other sources — using new genetic engineering technology.

Biomass Transportation Fuels? Ethanol costs:

– Current: $1.22/gal estimate– 2010: $0.67/gal estimate

? Near term - biomass wastes for oxygenates; longer term - energy crops for bulk fuel

Source: Technology Opportunities to Reduce

U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions, October 1997

? Biochemical and thermochemical processing

? Displacing gasoline with ethanol in light-duty vehicles gives 90% reduction in carbon emissions

? R&D: low-cost production of enzymes, development of microorganisms, improved performance of thermochemical processing, energy crop advances

Bioethanol Production

“Cooking”

+ =

catalyst+

heat+

time

sugarsand

residual solids

(lignin)

ethanolfermentationand recovery

ligninutilization(boiler fuel)

Biodiesel

Griffin Industries, USA and Bruck Industries, Austria

Basic TechnologyVegetable oils Recycled Greases

Dilute AcidEsterification

Transesterification

Crude Glycerin

Refining

Crude biodiesel

Biodiesel

Sulfur +methanol

Methanol + KOH

Glycerinrefining

Glycerin

Methanolrecovery

Production Cost per Gallon Biodiesel

0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50

0 .05 .1 .15 .2 .25 .3

feedstock cost $/lb

$/galYellow greases

Tallow & lard

Soy oil

Canola & other oils

Trap grease

3 mil gal/yr plant, 80% glycerin. Total cost at plant gate.

Does not include transportation and handling.

Biopower TechnologiesBiopower Technologies

2.50

3.50

4.50

5.50

6.50

7.50

8.50

1995 2000 2005 2010 2020 2025 2030

Year

Cos

t of E

lect

rici

ty

(cen

ts /

kWh)

Cost of Electricity:Biomass Gasification and Co-Firing

Biomass Gasification Combined-Cycle

Coal (baseline)

Biopower Capacity Projection, 2000-2020*

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

2000 2005 2010 2020Year

Industrial Pulp and Paper Co-FiringGasification Modular

Cap

acity

(MW

)

*Market Potential with Supporting Policy Measures

Life Cycle CO2 and Energy Balance for a Direct-Fired Biomass System

Current biomass power industry

Direct-Fired Biomass Residue System134% carbon closure

Net greenhouse gas emissions-410 g CO2 equivalent/kWh

Landfill andMulching

Transportation Construction Power PlantOperation

10 3

1,204

1,627

Avoided CarbonEmissions

1.0

FossilEnergyIn

FossilEnergyIn

ElectricityOut28.4

Life Cycle Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Each Power Production System

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

BiomassIntegrated

GasificationCombined

Cycle

Coal Coal/biomass co-fired

Biomass Residues direct-fired

Natural GasCombined Cycle

GW

P (g

CO

2-eq

uiva

lent

/ kW

h of

net

pow

er p

rodu

ctio

n)

Dedicated

Offset landfill methane emissions

NOx Emissions - Life Cycle Total and Plant Operating Emissions

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

BIGCC direct coal - avg co-firing coal - NSPS NGCC

NO

x em

issi

ons

(lb/M

Wh)

total NOx

operating plant NOx

Biomass Combustion - Potential for NOx Reduction

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

Existing - FGR Future - FGR +SCR (80%) Future with CHP East Texas Standard West Texas Standard

NO

x (l

b/M

Wh

)

Status of Biopower in U.S.

•Currently Installed:– U.S. Biomass Power: 10,500

MW (or about 8% of all non-utility generating capacity)

– 7,000 MW from biomass residues

– Over 500 facilities in U.S. generate electricity from wood or wood waste

Bioenergy Electricity Generation, 1981 - 1999

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999

Year

Cap

acity

, MW

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

Gen

erat

ion,

Bill

ion

kWh

Capacity Generation

?

Ref: EIA, Annual Energy Review 1997, Renewable Energy Annual 1995Renewable Energy Annual 2000

?

Biomass

10.5 GW

Grid Connected Electricity From Biomass

Biopower Program

• Near Term– Cofiring

(Rural Development)

• Mid Term– Modular Systems

• Long Term– Integrated Gasification

Combined Cycle

Comparative Process Efficiency

Cofiring • New York Salix (Willow)

– Dunkirk Power Plant• 10-15 MWe from biomass

• Iowa Switchgrass– Ottumwa Generating Station

• Up to 35 MWe from biomass

• Hawaiian Energy Cane– HC&S Sugar Mill,

Puunene, Maui– Alternate feedstock processing

Switchgrass Cofiring TestingAlliant Ottumwa Generating Station,

Chillicothe, Iowa 700 MW PC

DebalerDebaler

GrinderGrinder

NozzlesNozzles

BiomassBiomass

CoalCoal

½ ton bales½ ton bales

Chariton ValleyChariton ValleySwitchgrass FieldSwitchgrass Field

1300 tons SWG1300 tons SWGUp to 16 TPHUp to 16 TPH

3% of coal3% of coal

Develop gasification technologies for the conversion of biomass into clean, sustainable energy and other products

Elements:?Build on successful and existing

technology platforms?Plan and implement a robust R&D

program?Establish supportive

infrastructure

Gasification

FERCO GASIFIER- BURLINGTON, VT

Battelle Columbus Gasifier200 TPD

Waste HeatWaste HeatRecoveryRecovery

Flue GasFlue Gas

AshAshRecoveryRecoveryCycloneCyclone

DryerDryer

WetWetFeedFeed

DailyDailyStorageStorage

FeedFeed

SteamSteam

Gasifier

AirAir

SandSandSandSand

&&CharChar

Combustor

CycloneCycloneSeparatorsSeparators

Ash

ScrubberScrubber

WaterWater

WastewaterWastewater

Medium BTUProduct Gas

Product HeatRecovery

Gasification Process

Gas Conditioning

The FERCO SilvaGas Biomass

Other DOE Gasification Efforts•Biopower Cofiring Initiative

•Nexant, LLC –Study the use of poultry litter in a biomass gasification co-firing demonstration•Gas Technology Inst. & Calla Energy Partners –Develop and demonstrate advanced biomass gasification technology

•Biomass & Black Liquor Gasification Initiative•Georgia-Pacific, Big Island, Georgia (Stonechem –MTCI gasifier)•Gaylord Container Corp., Pine Bluff, Arkansas•Boise Cascade, site TDB•Details to be announced

•Biomass R&D: Advanced Power Generation Technologies•Biomass Gasification, > 5MW•Pre-commercial research: gasification based CHP•$1 M USD available•Solicitation closing date: June 8, 2001•http://www.netl.doe.gov/business•Reference: DE-PS26-01NT41130

Small Modular Biopower InitiativeUSDOE Biopower Program

Gasification - ICEVillage Power

Gasification - ICEVillage Power

Stirling EngineResidential

Gasification-STMini-grid

Micro-turbineLFG, Grid

Phase 2 Prototype Projects

INITIATIVE GOAL

To develop Small Modular Biopower (SMB) Systems that:

• improve the quality of life

• are fuel flexible

• are efficient

• are simple to operate

• have minimum negative environmental impacts

• are designed for domestic/international markets

Ratings of Features by Risk Categories for Small-Scale Biopower Systems

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

Construction Operating Feedstock Environmental Economic Market

Major Vulnerabilities

Major Advantages / Opportunities

Carbona: 5 MWe CHP Gasifier-Steam Turbine located In Lemvig, Jutland, Denmark

Strategic Partners: FLS miljo, Lemvig Varmevaerk, Danish Energy Agency

CPC: 25 kW Gasification-ICE Prototypes, Lab Unit at CPC, Philippines Unit, Hoopa Indian Reservation Unit in Calif.

Strategic Partners: Shell International Renewables, California Energy Commission, Hoopa Indian Tribe

U.S. Forest Service-DOE-CPC community demonstrations – 6 locations

External Power: 3 kW Pellet Stove - Stirling Engine CHP System

Strategic Partners: Wood Mizer, Sunpower

FlexEnergy: 30 kW microturbine with co-compression of fuel/ air and catalytic combustion

Strategic Partners:Capstone Turbine Corp., California Energy Commission

SMB Phase 2 Project Descriptions

Carbona Project: Lemvig, Denmark

BIOMASSBIOMASS

ASHASH

AIRAIR

ASHASH

POWERPOWER

HEATHEAT

FUELFUELFEEDINGFEEDING

GASIFIERGASIFIER

TAR CRACKERTAR CRACKER

GAS COOLERGAS COOLER GAS COOLERGAS COOLER

STACKSTACK

HEAT RECOVERYHEAT RECOVERY

GAS TANKGAS TANK

GAS ENGINE(S)GAS ENGINE(S)

CPC 12 kWe Field PrototypeAlaminos, Panay, the Philippines

USFS – DOE – CPC Community Demonstration Program

•Objective: to demonstrate the feasibility of using SMB biopower systems to produce energy (CHP) with wood chips from forest fuel reduction activities

•Six sites to be chosen

•Two-year demonstrations

External Power

Dual-engine prototype

Electricity Out + Heat Out = Heat In

FlexEnergy Project

MBMS

TMBMS

Gasification (TCUF)

Engine Testing

Emissions Monitoring

NREL Facilities

Clean Syngas

H213 kW Power

Generator

Catalyst Test Bed

Biomass Syngas: CO, CO2, H2, etc

Bio-Reactor

Multifunction OperationSchematic of Biorefinery Test-Bed Operation

Continuous operation for 48 hours

Basic hot gas cleanup

Fluidized Fluidized bed biomass bed biomass

gasifiergasifier

slipstream

slipstream

Electricity

NREL - South Table Mountain Site02556011

Solar Energy Research Facility (SERF)

Field Test Laboratory Building (FTLB)Visitors Center