bioavailability o fdisperse dosage form
DESCRIPTION
Formulation Development and BABETRANSCRIPT
Bioavailability Of
Disperse Dosage Forms
By
Mohammad SohailMphil pharmaceutics
Islamia university [email protected]
Bioavailability Of Disperse Dosage Forms
Bioavailability
It is the measurement of the rate and extent to
which an active drug ingredient or therapeutic
moiety is absorbed from drug product and
becomes available at the site of action.
Relative Bioavailability
• (RBA) is a systemic availability of a drug from a dosage form as compared to a reference standard given by the same route of administration.
• Relative Bioavailability is calculated as a ratio of the
“AUC” for the dosage form to the “AUC” for the reference dosage form given in the same dose.
RBA
• The determination of RBA is important in generic drug studies ( e.g. Bioequivalence studies ).
• Bioequivalence is the relative bioavailability study.
[ AUC ]Oral test / Dose oral test
RBA = _______________________
[ AUC ]oral reference / Dose oral Ref
Absolute Bioabavailability
• ‘F’ is the fraction of drug systemically absorbed from the dosage form.
• “F” is calculated as the ratio of the AUC for the dosage form given orally to the AUC obtained after IV drug administration, ( adjusted for dose).
• A parenteral drug solution given by the IV administration is considered to have 100% systemic absorption ( i.e. F= 1).
Absolute Bioavailability
• An ‘F’ value of 0.80 0r 80% indicated that only 80% of the drug was systemically available from the oral dosage form.
[ AUC ]Oral / Dose oral
• F = ______________________
[ AUC ]IV / Dose IV
Difference between Absolute and Relative Bioavailability
• The difference between AB and RBA is illustrated by the following hypothetical example, assume that ,
• IV injection (product A)• Oral dosage form No 1 (product B)• Oral dosage form No 2 ( product C)
All containing the same dose of the same drug.
AB vs RBA
Drug Product AUC ( mcg/ml . hr )
A IV Injection 100
B Oral dosage form (Refer) 50
C Oral dosage form (generic) 40
Bioequivalent Drug Products
• According to FDA “ The rate and extent of absorption
of the test drug do not show a significant difference
from the rate and extent of absorption of the reference
drug when administered at the same molar dose of the
therapeutic ingredient under similar experimental
conditions in either a single dose or multiple doses”.
Disperse Systems
• Systems in which one substance the disperse phase, is distributed through out another substance, the continuous phase or vehicle.
• Types Of Disperse Systems
• Suspensions • Emulsions • Creams• Ointments• Pastes• Foams • Suppositories• Aerosols
Routes Of Drug Administration
• Oral Drug Delivery• Parenteral Drug Delivery• Transdermal Drug delivery• Nasal Drug Delivery• Pulmonary Drug Delivery• Ophthalmic Drug Delivery• Rectal Drug Delivery
Properties Of Disperse Dosage Form
• Depending on the route of administration, the disperse phase may vary in particle size as,
• For inhalation and ophthalmic use particle size is less then 1µm.
• For Dermatological use it is about 10- 100µm.
• For oral use it is up to 200µm.
Properties Of Disperse Dosage Form
• Complex to formulate and prepare.
• Bulky and prone to various routes of physical
degradation ( i.e. segregation, coalescence, caking)
which leads to inaccurate dosing.
Advantages Of Disperse Dosage Form
• As compared to solutions it has adequate shelf life.
• Easier to administer to young and elder patients than a tablet or capsules.
• Less volume of formulation of poorly soluble drugs of same dose than solutions, so more convenient for patient use.
• Advantages in masking the taste of drugs.
Formulation Factors Affecting Drug Release From Disperse Systems:
• Wetting The initial dispersion of particles in a suspension requires wetting by
the dispersion medium.
In case suspension is composed of particles that are hydrophobic, it is difficult to remove air from the surface of the particle .
Entrapped air brings particles to the top of the medium,
particles degradation, that leads to an unstable suspension.
Wetting
Poor wetting of drug particles give rise to disperse formulations with poor physical stability and poor dissolution properties.
To overcome this problem wetting agents are used, e.g.
Surfactants:
polysorbates, sorbitan, esters, etc.
Hydrophilic Polymers:
acacia, bentonite, colloidal silicon dioxide and cellulose derivatives.
Hydrophilic Liquids:
alcohol, glycerol, propylene glycol, etc.
Particle Size
• Dissolution rate is direct function of total surface area for a dispersed phase.
• The surface area increases inversely with the particle size according to the expression:
Sv = 6/d
Sv is the specific surface area, and d is the average particle diameter.
Particle Size
• Zinc suspension are crystalline having particle size of
10 – 40 micro meter give delayed onset of action 4 – 6
hours & prolong action to 36 hours, while prompt zinc
insulin suspension are amorphous particles with particle
size smaller than 2 micro meter gives prompt onset of
action in 1 -3 hours & duration of action 12 – 16 hours.
Viscosity
• Viscosity of dispersion arises from two sources:
• Intrinsic viscosity of dispersion • Interaction of the particles of disperse phase
• The intrinsic viscosity of the dispersion medium affects the dissolution rate of particles through its effect on the diffusion coefficient D.
Viscosity
• Increase in viscosity decreases the diffusion coefficient, which
decreases the dissolution rate.
According to Stokes-Einstein equation,
D = kT/6πηr
Here,
η = viscosity
k = Boltzmann’s constant
T = Absolute temperature
r = Molecular radius
Drug release from disperse systems
• The basic diffusion controlled model for solid dissolution was developed by Noyes & Whitney & was later modified by Nernst.
Where dQ/dt = dissolution rate Where dQ/dt = dissolution rate D = diffusion coefficient D = diffusion coefficient H = diffusion layer thickness H = diffusion layer thickness Cs = solubility Cs = solubility Cb= bulk solution concentration Cb= bulk solution concentration A = surface area of particleA = surface area of particle
h
)C -(CDA
dt
dQ bs
Absorption Barriers
• Disperse dosage form are commonly administered through different routes but most commonly used are orally and topically to the skin and eye.
• An absorption barrier is the outer layer which is the most resistant to drug penetration.
Barriers for Skin
Barriers For Skin
• For skin the resistant layer is the Stratum Corneum, which consists of metabolically inactive cells.
• The stratum corneum is 8-16 cells layers, thick and varies with body region, but over most of the body the thickness is 10µm.
• The hydration level at the stratum corneum is about 10-25%.
• The epidermis and dermis are situated just below the stratum corneum but provides far less resistance to drug penetration.
pathways for percutaneous absorption:
Transcellular route:
• Represent drug movement through hydrated keratin layer cells & is frequently referred to as polar route.
Intercellular route:
• Drug movement occurs between the cells. Hydrophobic drugs dissolve in lipid phase & diffuse across the stratum corneum by passing through the spaces between the cells.
Transfollicular route:
• Follows along hair shafts to reach the systemic circulation through the capillaries & venules that supply the hair follicle.
Barriers For Eye
Barriers For Eye
• The epithelium of cornea provides the greatest diffusional resistance for most ophthalmic drugs.
• It is 5 or 6 layers thick and about 50µm thick.
• Bowman’s membrane, stroma, Descemet’s membrane and the endothelium are adjacent layers but only incase of lipophillic drugs these layers provides significant resistance to penetration.
Barriers For Eye
• The hydration level of the cornea is 78%, which is significantly greater than that of the skin.
• The surface area of the corneal absorption site is about 1.2cm2 compared to typical absorption areas for the skin, which vary from 2-25cm2.
• Transcorneal route is considered primary pathway but scleral permeation & conjuctival blood vessels are possible alternatives.
Barriers For GIT
Barriers For GIT
• The absorption of the certain weak acid occurs through mucosal surface of stomach.
• Due to short residence time and low surface area drug absorption is less.
• primarily the drug absorption take place in small intestine.
• The epithelial cells of the small intestine are the Villi, which are columnar, 1µm in length, and have rapid renewal rate of two days.
Barriers for GIT
• Because of many folds in the small intestine the total surface area is about 2,000,000cm2.
• GIT absorption is not completed until drug reaches systemic absorption, which means that the drug must cross the hepatoportal system intact and enter the inferior vena cava.
Barrier for Pulmonary Drug Delivery
• Mucus Barrier The first barrier which is encountered before the drug
can reach its site of action is the mucus, present as a viscoelastic layer in tracheobronchial region.
• If a drug is given as a aerosolized powder then the
drug first needs to dissolve in the mucus layer.
• Mucus has very high water content varying b/w 90-95%.
Barriers for Pulmonary Drug Delivery
• Its viscosity may result in slow dissolution of drugs.
• The dissolution may be the rate determining step especially for poorly soluble drugs such as some of the corticosteroids, which are delivered as a dry powder aerosols.
• Improvement in the drug penetration in to mucus has been attempted using mucolytic drugs such as N-aetylecysteine which acts to reduce mucus viscosity.
Absorption Factors
SKIN EYE GIT
Barrier Stratum corneum
Superficial layer of epithelium
Epithelium
Thickness 8-26 layers 5-6 layers 1 layer
hydration 10-25% 78% High
area 2-25cm2 1.3cm2 2,000,000
Physiological Factors Affecting Absorption
• Factors affecting Percutaneous Absorption• Skin PH
Normal adult human skin’s pH value is some place between 4.5 and 6. Whereas, infants’ skin pH is a bit to neutral value (pH=7)
• Hydration Level
Skin has much lower hydration level, which restricts aqueous diffusion.
Factors affecting Percutaneous Absorption
• Skin Age• As the skin ages it becomes more fragile and effects
the absorption of the transdermal drug absorption.• Skin Metabolism
Presystemic metabolism, in the skin can obviously modify drug bioavailability.
The coetaneous first pass effect for nitroglycerin, for example has been estimated to be 15-20%.
The epidermis is a biochemicaly active tissue with metabolic capability, enzymes have been identified in the skin including Cytochrome P450 system.
Factors affecting Percutaneous Absorption
• Blood Flow
The drug should be applied on those places of skin which has larger blood supply otherwise the lower blood absorption will occur.
• Skin Condition and Disease
Changes in barrier function due to skin disease generally either from alteration of the lipid/protein composition of stratum corneum.
Factors affecting Percutaneous Absorption
• Desquamation
The epidermis undergoes complete renewal every three weeks or so, This corresponds there fore to the shedding of one layer of the Stratum corneum per day.
• Skin Irritation and sensitization
Skin irritation and sensitization by drug also causes inflammatory response which also effect drug absorption.
Percutaneous Absorption
• Advantages• Avoidance of first pass effect.
• Drug levels can be maintained in the systemic circulation within the therapeutic window.
• Improved patient compliance.
• Drug input can be terminated simply by the removal of patch.
Percutaneous Absorption
• Disadvantages• Limited only to potent drug molecules.
• Limited to those drugs which have adequate solubility in both lipophilic and hydrophilic environment, to reach dermal microcirculation and gain access to systemic circulation.
Factors affecting Ophthalmic Absorption
• Narrow PH Range
Eye – 7.3-7.7
• Small Area Of Absorption
• Nasolacrimal Drainage and Tear Turnover
Which reduces residence time at the absorption site compared to the skin and G.I.T.
Factors affecting Ophthalmic Absorption
• Osmolality
When eye surface is covered with the HYPOTONIC SOLUTION, the permeability of the epithelium is increased considerably and water flows in to the cornea, the corneal tissue swell, increasing the pressure on the nerves and causing anaesthetizing action on the cornea.
• In case of HYPERTONIC SOLUTIONS water flows from the aqueous layer through the cornea to the eye surface.
Factors affecting G.I.T Absorption
• GI Motility
There are 03 major types of GI motility.
• Segmentation• Tonic contractions• Peristalsis
• The length of time a drug moiety is in contact with the absorbing tissue will influence the extent of drug absorption.
Factors affecting G.I.T Absorption
• pH
The pH at the absorption site is an important factor in drug absorption because many drugs are either weak organic acids or bases.
In solutions organic electrolytes exists in, • non ionized (usually lipid soluble)• an ionized ( usually poorly lipid soluble)
The fraction of each species depends on the pH of the solution.
pH Location pH
Stomach
Duodenum
Jejunum
Ileum
Colon
Rectum
1.5-3.5
5-7
6-7
6.0-7.5
5.5-7.0
7
pH
• Changes in the pH of fluids may improve or decrease the absorption of drugs.
• Disease or drug related changes in a gastric pH may influence the dissolution, stability and/or absorption of certain drugs.
Metabolism
• Drug metabolism may occur at various sites along the GI tract, including:
• In the gut fluids• Within the microvilli• By colonic micro flora• Cytochome P450 3A4 is highly expressed in human
small intestinal mucosa and is responsible for metabolism of, Cyclosporine, Midazolam, Clozapine, during passage across the intestinal mucosa.
Metabolism
• First Pass metabolism
• Absorbed drugs are carried in the portal circulation to the liver where they may be metabolized.
• Drugs that are structurally resembles nutrients such as polypeptides, nucleotides, or fatty acids, may be specially susceptible to enzymatic degradation.
• For example, Protolytic enzymes Chemotrypsin and Trypsin can degrade insulin and other peptide drugs.
Metabolism
• Acid or base mediated drugs breakdown is also a possibility in GI tract.
• Drugs such as Erythromycin, penicillin's, and Omeprazole are unstable in acidic media and will therefore degrade and provides lower effective dose.
Presence Of Food• Drug absorption generally is less efficient in the presence of food.• Mechanisms involved:
• By slowing down gastric emptying rate
• Food provides viscous environment
• Drug-Food complex is formed
• Gastrointestinal fluids are secreted in response to food, enzymes present in these fluids may deactivate a drug moiety.
• Increased acid secretion provoked by food may degrade acid labile compounds.
Presence Of Food
• Food constituents may compete with drugs for carrier
mediated absorption mechanisms.
Individual variation
• Gender• Gastric acid secretion is greater in men than in
women.
• Whereas gastric emptying time is slower in women.
• Enzymes expression is also different between men and women, for example, sex related cytochrome P450 isoenzymes and glucuronidation enzymes are more abundant in men.
Gender
• Pregnancy results in reduced gastric secretion increased intestinal motility, increased plasma volume, decreased plasma drug binding and also an additional pharmacokinetic compartment.
• These altered pharmacokinetic factors may require modifications in the dosage regimen for certain drugs.
Race
• Racial differences in oral drug bioavailability are known to exist and may be due to environmental, dietary or genetic differences.
• These differences are becoming increasingly important in therapeutics due to, increasingly international nature of drug development and use and also the multi-racial nature of population of many countries.
• The most profound differences are found in metabolic processes.
Example
• The hydroxylation of debrisoquine, an adrenergic-blocker used in the treatment of hypertension, is expressed as two phenotypes as,
• Extensive metabolizer (EM)• Poor metabolizer (PM)
• Swedish and Spanish populations appear to both Ems and PMs, whereas Chinese and African populations are predominantly PMs.
Age
• Gastric fluids are less acidic in newborns than in adults, which can affect the absorption of ionizable and acid-labile drugs.
• Neonates are also associated with leaky epithelium, which permits the absorption of proteins, and macromolecules not normally absorbed from GI tract.
• Decreased enzymatic activity, including hepatic first pass metabolism, is associated with the elderly.
Methods Of Assessing Bioavailability Of Drugs
• Bioavailability testing is a mean of predicting the clinical efficacy of a drug in a given dosage form is a direct evidence of the efficiency with which a dosage form performs its intended therapeutic function.
• Bioavailability studies are also carried out to compare the availability of a drug substance from different dosage forms, or from the same dosage form produced by different manufacturers.
Methods Of Assessing Bioavailability Of Drugs
• Following are the methods used in bioavailability and bioequivalence assessment:
• (1) Plasma Drug Concentration:• The most commonly used and most direct method to
assess the clinical performance of a drug involves measurement of the drug concentrations in the blood, plasma or serum.
• Single dose of a drug is administered.• Blood samples are collected over a period of time
following administration, and are analyzed for drug contents.
Plasma Drug Concentration
• Based on the blood concentration as a function of time
interference are drawn regarding the rate and extent of
absorption of drugs.
Plasma concentration vs. time profile of a single dose of a drug ingested orally
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 5 10 15 20
TIME (hours)
Pla
sm
a C
on
cen
tra
tio
n
Key Parameters:
• AUC: The area under the plasma concentration –time curve
from t = 0 to t = ∞. It is the measurement of drug bioavailability.
The AUC is proportional to the total amount of drug reaching systemic circulation.
The units for AUC are concentration –time units (e.g. µg
hr/ml.
AUC
Peak height or Cmax
• It is the peak plasma drug concentration and represent the maximum drug concentration obtained after extra vascular administration of drugs.
• It is a function of both the rate and extent of absorption.
• Cmax will increase with an increase in a dose as well as with an increase in the absorption rate
Time of occurrence or tmax
• It is the time required for the concentration of drugs in plasma to reach its highest value Cmax following extra vascular drug administration.
• For a given dose and bioavailability fraction, tmax is inversely dependent on absorption rate.
• Tmax as the drug absorption increases.
(2) Urinary Drug excretion Data
• An alternative and indirect method for the assessment of Bioavailability of drugs is to use the urinary drug excretion data.
• It involves the collection of urine samples and the determination of the total quantity of drugs excreted in the urine as a function of time.
• It is known that the urinary excretion of the unchanged drug is directly proportional to the plasma concentration of total drug.
Urinary Drug excretion
(3) Acute pharmacodynamic or pharmacologic effect
• In some cases the quantitative measurement of a drug is not available or it lacks sufficient accuracy and reproducibility.
• in such cases acute pharmacodynamic effects are used as an index of drug bioavailability.
• For example, Effect on pupil diameter, heart rate, or blood pressure.
Acute pharmacodynamic or pharmacologic effect
• This method is based on the assumptions that “ a given intensity of response is associated with a particular drug concentration at the site of action.
• E.g. variation of meiotic response intensity can be directly related to the oral dose of chlorpromazine.
• In this case an acute pharmacodynamic effect-time curve is constructed .
Acute pharmacodynamic or pharmacologic effect
(4) Clinical Observations
• This method of assessing bioavailability of a drug product is through the demonstration of the clinically significant effect.
• Well-controlled clinical trials in human can establish the safety and effectiveness of a drug product.
• However this approach is least accurate least sensitive, and least reproducible.
(5) In vitro Bioavailability studies
• Drug dissolution studies may under certain conditions give an indication of drug bioavailability.
• Ideally the in-vitro drug dissolution rate should correlate with the in-vivo drug bioavailability.
• Dissolution studies are often performed on several test formulations of the same drug.
• The test formulation that demonstrate the most rapid drug dissolution in-vitro, will have generally the most rapid rate of drug bioavailability.
Gastrointestinal Bioavailability
• The bioavailability of an oral dosage form is determined
by the extent of absorption of the drugs throughout the
GIT.
Gastrointestinal Bioavailability
Oral suspension
• Oral suspension dosage form is developed for drug product that has low solubility.
• Also for masking the bitter taste of the drugs.
• To overcome the difficulty that very young & old have in swallowing tablets and capsules.
Oral suspension
• Physical instability of suspension results an inaccurate dose. Formation of agglomerates in the suspension result in the reduced bioavailability as compared to tablet dosage form.
• Aq. Suspension is often used as reference formulation in bioavailability studies.
Oral suspension
• To optimize the bioavailability of oral suspension. Select the:
• Appropriate drug particle size• Particle densities• Vehicle viscosities
Oral suspension
• Nitrofurantoin suspension exhibit delayed absorption resulting in longer duration of action.
• Bioavailability of sulfathiazole increased as the viscosity of suspending agent increased due to increased absorption.
• It is thought that it occurs due to improved wetting by suspending agent.
Oral suspension
• Griseofulvin when administered with meal high in fat contents demonstrated increased absorption.
• Sod. Salicylate suspended in coconut oil administered show 1.32 fold increase in extent of absorption due to increased residence time of drug in stomach.
Oral emulsion
• The stability and release of drugs from emulsion are:• Emulsifier type • Droplet size
• Absorption of micronized Griseofulvin fro an o/w emulsion dosage form increased when compared with oil suspension and aq. Suspension in rate.
• When micronized phenytoin was administered as a corn oil emulsion, both rate and extent of absorption increased.
Dermatological Bioavailability
• Transdermal medication
In recent years transdermal route has been used for systemic delivery of Scopolamine, Clonidine, and Nitroglycerin, all very potent drugs with high transdermal penetration rates.
Transdermal Medications are of two types,
Those that control the rate of drug delivery to the skin.
Those that allows the skin to control the rate of drug absorption.
Dermatological Bioavailability
• Transdermal permeation of drug from various topical systems is governed by two factors:
• Penetration rate of drug • Release of drug from the system
Dermatological Bioavailability
• Permeability through skin depends upon:
• Thickness of stratum coeneum• Integrity of stratum corneum• Hydration level of skin• Partition coefficient
• Permeability characteristics is described by its permeability coefficient ‘‘p’’
• P = DK/h
Dermatological Bioavailability
• The skin permeation enhancer have been used to promote drug permeation for local and systemic effects as:
• Dimethylsulfoxide• Dimethyleformamide• Dimethyleacetamide
• Enhance the efficacy of tetracycline for treatment of acne at the level of 0.125%.
Measurement of Dermatological bioavailability
• A promising approach to the measurement of steroids bioavailability in the skin has been to measure the vasoconstrictor activity produced by topically applied steroids.
• Procedure: • The procedure consists of applying test product to
7×7mm2 outlined by a template on the both forearms of human volunteers.
• A thin layer of ointment is applied to the grid area and secured for 6 hours.
Procedure:
• At that time the dressing are removed and the forearms are washed with soap and water.
• At various intervals over the next 24 hours or more, scores of 0-3 are assigned to each response
• At the end the plot of the percentage of the total possible score can be plotted over time.
Ophthalmic Bioavailability
• Ophthalmologist prefers topical application to the eye for treating eye diseases. Due to the toxicity of some drugs such as anticholinesterase inhibitor & cholinergic drugs they cannot be used systemically.
• Relatively poor ocular bioavailability(2-10 % of the applied dose) is due to:
• Narrow pH range, rapid drainage, facilitated elimination by blinking, induced tearing from mechanical or chemical stimulation & small surface area.
Ophthalmic suspensions:
• Aq. Suspensions of lipophilic steroids were developed because water-soluble analogues not adequately penetrate the cornea.
• Particle size of suspended drug particles & viscosity of vehicle influence the bioavailability of ophthalmic suspension.
• Polymers such as cellulosic derivative poly vinyl alcohol & polyvinyl pyrrolidone impart adequate viscosity, retard drainage rate of instilled drop & promote longer retention time on the cornea.
Ophthalmic suspensions:
• The particle size of suspended drugs is below 10 micrometer to prevent abrasion of cornea. Particle size also affects the dissolution rate.
• The time required for dissolution & corneal absorption must be less than the residence time of the drug in the conjunctival sac to take advantage of the retained particles. The saturated solution of suspension provides initial response, whereas the retained particles maintain the response as particle dissolve & drug is absorbed.
Ophthalmic suspensions:
• With the decrease in the particle size bioavailability increases. Three suspensions of dexamethasone with particle sizes 5.75, 11.5 & 22 micrometer exhibit increasing blood levels with decreasing particle size when instilled into the eyes of rabbit.
• The particle size must be small enough to prevent corneal abrasion, because mild irritation can induce lacrimation & facilitate drug removal.
• Label should state, “ shake well before each use”.
Ophthalmic ointments:
• Ophthalmic ointments are softer than dermatological ointments, at the eye temperature do not liquefy but readily soften & with the blinking action continuously spread throughout the conjunctival sac.
• Ocular contact time, diffusion through the bulk of the ointment, effective drug concentration at cornea & facilitated release determine the bioavailability of ophthalmic drugs.
Ophthalmic ointments:
• Contact time of ophthalmic preparations is of primary importance because otherwise significant drug abs. cannot take place.
• Ophthalmic ointments provide long contact time as compared to viscous solution so used preferably.
• Ocular bioavailability of chloramphenicol ointment & solution was compared & it is found that the ointment prolong the drug concentration in aq. Humor above the minimum effective concentration while solution had to be instilled every 15 min. to attain comparable drug levels, which rapidly fall when the instillation were discontinued.
Ophthalmic ointments:
• Studies also report that increase in viscosity of vehicle retard drainage & promote contact time with the cornea due to increase in contact time hydrophilic drugs show greater improvement in ocular bioavailability.
Rectal bioavailability:
Rectal suspension (enemas): Administration of drug solution or suspension by
rectum is accomplished with an enema system. Enemas are large in volume (50- 100ml) have limited patient acceptability & used in disease state which directly affect the colon e.g. ulcerative colitis.
• When carbamazepine administered as rectal suspension show low bioavailability as compared to oral suspension of carbamazepine. It is likely that slow dissolution of hydrophobic carbamazepine limited their bioavailability.
Rectal suppositories:
• The absorption of drugs from rectal suppositories is a complex process. There are three types of suppository bases.
1) Fatty or oleaginous bases include cocoa butter. Fatty bases melt at body temperature & are immiscible with rectal fluids. Drugs partition between the oily base & rectal fluid
2) Water soluble bases include polyethylene glycols & dissolve rapidly in the rectal fluids.
3) Emulsifying bases are not miscible with water & form emulsion when water from rectal fluid is incorporated into the suppository.
Rectal suppositories:
• Bioavailability of Phenobarbital & Phenobarbital sodium was observed from different suppository bases. Result indicated that drug release from suppository base was not rate limiting rather drug permeability across the rectal tissues was controlling the bioavailability of Phenobarbital.
• Usually drug incorporated into rapidly dissolving water-soluble bases result in higher bioavailability than do the fatty bases.