bibliography bibliography
TRANSCRIPT
198
BIBLIOGRAPHYBIBLIOGRAPHYBIBLIOGRAPHYBIBLIOGRAPHY
Adhiambo, Monica. (2012) Selection and use of instructional
resources in English language teaching in selected public
secondary schools in Nairobi Province.
Aggarwal, J.C., (1983). Land marks in the history of Modern Indian
Education. New Delhi : Vikas Publishing House.
Aggarwal, Kusum. (1986). A study of the effect of parental
encouragement on the educational development of
secondary stage students. Ph.D., Thesis, Hemvati
Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University.
Ahuja, G.C. and Ahuja Pramila. (1988). Reading comprehension
tests (with cloze and multiple choice items for Classes
VIII, IX and X). Independent study. Mysore: Central
Institute of Indian Languages. Fifth Survey of Educational
Research, Volume II. 738 Pp.
Alavandar, R. (1992). A study of selected variables relating to
English reading competency of high school pupils Ph.D.,
Thesis Annamalai University cited in Fifth Survey of
Educational Research, Volume II. 739 Pp.
Allen, J.P.B. & Widdowson, H.G. (1974). Teaching the
communicative use of Englsh. Iral 12/1:1-21.
Altrichter, H., Posh, P. and Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers
investigate their work. London, New York:
RoutledgeAtkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the post-
process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 1(12), 3-16 Pp.
Amy Cooper and Dawn Bikowski (2007). Problems in writing skills
in post graduation level students, Volume 6, Issue 3, 206-
221 Pp.
Annie Vijaya Kumari. CH. (2001). Methods of Teaching English,
New Era publications, Guntur.
199
Aparaj, S.M. (1991). A study of developing auditory abilities through
language exercises in teaching English as a second
language in secondary schools. Ph.D., Thesis. Shivaji
University cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research,
Volume II, 742Pp.
Badger, R., & White, B. (2000). A process genre approach to
teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160 Pp.
Bag Anjali. (1990). A cross-sectional study on the differential
aptitudes of the students in English. Ph.D., Thesis.
University. Of Kalyani, cited in Fifth Survey of Educational
Research Volume II, 743Pp.
Banatwala, Ayesha G. (1989). Exploring the relationship between
classroom interaction and uptake in, EFL (English as
foreign language) teaching classes in order to provide
better learning opportunities. Ph.D., Thesis. Shreemati
Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women’s University cited
in Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 743-
744Pp.
Baskaran, Herbert S. (1989). The impact of the remedial teaching
programmes on the common errors committed by student
of Standard XU in written English. M.Phil., Dissertation.
Alagappa University cited in Fifth Survey of Educational
Research Volume II, 744-745Pp.
Bhatia, K. & Bhatia, B. (2003). The Philosophical and Sociological
foundations of Education. Doaba House.:Delhi.
Bhatia, K. et al., (1986). Modern Indian Education and Its problems.
Hariana, Praksh Brothers Educational Publishers.
Bhatnagar, R.P., (2007). Reading in Methodology of Research in
Education. R. Lall. Public Depot. : Meerut.
Bhishikar, L., (1980). Experimental Analytical study of the
Acquisition of Reading Skill, Ph.D., Thesis., Poona
200
University.
Brean, M. & Candling, C.N. (1980). The essentials of a
communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics
½ :89-112 Pp.
Brumfit, C.J. & Johnson, K. (eds) (1979). The communicative
approach to Language Teaching, ELBS : London.
Canale, M & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative
approaches to second language teaching and testing.
Applied Linguistics 1/1: 1-47 Pp.
Carson, J. (2001). A task analysis of reading and writing in
academic contexts. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.),
Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading writing
connections, Ann Arbour, MI: the University of Michigan
Press, 48-83 Pp.
Carter V. Good., (1972). Essentials of Educational Research
Methodology and Design. Second Ed. Educational
Division, Meridith Corporation: New York.
Chatterjee, M., (1991). Attention, coding and speech related
process of skilled and less skilled readers. M.Phil.,
Dissertation. Utkal University cited in Fifth Survey of
Educational Research Volume II,746-744Pp, NCERT,
New Delhi.
Chaudhary, U., (1979). A Critical Study of the Language Policy of
India in relation to the Educational Needs and Aspirations
of the Different Linguistic Communities of India, Ph.D.
Thesis., MSU.
Chelini, A.B., (1991). A study on Achievement of basic
understandings and skills through higher primary
education. Ph.D., Thesis. University of Mysore.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge,
Mass: MIT Press.
201
Christine M. Robinson and Gerard M. Blair (1995). Writing skills
training for engineering students in large classes, Volume
30.
Dash. B.N. (2004). Teacher and Education in the Emerging Indian
Society Volume-1, Neelkamal publications, New Delhi.
Datta, P.C., (1982) School Children and Their Reading Habits,
Eastern India Centre for Mass communication studies,
Calcutta.
Deenamma, K.V, (1979). Verbal Barriers in Class-'room
communication, Ph.D. Thesis., Kerala. University.
Dewey, J., (1916). Democracy and Education. The Free Press:
London.
Di Pietro, Robert J. (1976). Contrasting patterns of language use: A
conversational approach. Canadian Modern Language
Review 33/1.
Duchardt, B., Furr, P., Horton, S. & McFerrin, K. (2006). A
Structured Analysis of Graduate Students’ Online Writing
Skills. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of
Society for Information Technology and Teacher
Education International Conference 2006, 1145-1150 Pp.
Education And National Development Report of The Education
Commission (1964-1966). NCERT, New Delhi.
Elizabeth Scott, M.S., (2009). How To Communicate: Improve Your
Relationships With Effective Communication Skills.
Fairclough, R. (1992). Language power. London: Longman.
Fakeye, David O and Yemi Ogunsiji (2009). English Language
Proficiency as a Predictor of Academic Achievement
among EFL Students in Nigeria. European Journal of
Scientific Research ISSN 1450-216X Vol.37 No.3 (2009),
Pp.490-495.
202
Firth, J.R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics: 1934-1951. London: OUP.
Gabrielatos, C. (2002). EFL writing: Product and process. Karen’s
Linguistic Issues.
Gani, S. (1990). Phonological awareness and beginning reading.
M.Phil., Dissertation. Utkal University cited in Fifth Survey
of Educational Research Volume II, 749 Pp, Baroda.
Gaya,, Tushar Kanta. (1988). Listening: Its nature, skill and
training. Indian Educational Review. Vol. 23 (2): 149-156
Pp, cited in. Fifth Survey of Educational Research
Volume II, NCERT, New Delhi.
Good, C.V. Barr, A.S. and Scate, D.E., (1941). Methodology of
Educational Research. Appleton – Century Craft : New
York.
Goretskaya. Yevgeniya. (2007). Influence of alternative methods of
instruction on English learners’ achievements in northern
California school districts; University of Phoenix.
Gopi (1981). A Diagnostic Study of the Errors Committed by the
Students of Grade VI in Oral Reading of Hindi Language
and the remedial measures to improve upon them,
Alahabad.
Report of the University Education Commission (1948-49). New
Delhi: Ministry of Education, Government of India,1949.
Report of the Secondary Education Commission (1952-53). New
Delhi: Ministry of Education, Government of India,1983.
Report of the Education Commission (1964-66) on Educational and
National Development. New Delhi: Ministry of Education,
Government of India, 1966.
National Policy on Education. New Delhi : Ministry of Human
Resources Development. Government of India (1985).
Report of the National Policy on Education. New Delhi: Ministry of
Human Resources Development. Government of India
203
(1986).
Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work.
Heineman Educational Books : London.
Grover. Santosh. (1991). An investigation Into the standards of
reading ability in English in Government and Central
schools of Delhi. Ph.D., Thesis, Jamia Millia Islamia cited
in Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II,
750Pp, NCERT, New Delhi.
Hale, G., Taylor, C., Bridheman, B., Carson, J., Kroll, B. & Kantor,
R. (1996). A study of writing tasks assigned in academic
degree program. educational testing service : Princeton,
N.:
Halliday. M.A.K. (1975). Learning how to mean explorations in the
development of language Edward Arnold : London
Halliday. M.A.K. (1969). Relevant models of language. Educational
Review 22/1:26-37 Pp.
Halliday. M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language.
Edward Arnold: London.
Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense
consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (4), 543-
572 Pp.
Haswell, Richard H. (1989). Change in Undergraduate and Post-
Graduate Writing Performance (Part 2): Problems in
Interpretation.
Hayland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more
autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research,
4 (1), 33-54 Pp.
Hilgard, E.R & Bower, G.H. (1966). Theories of Learning. New
York: Appleton Century-Crofts.
Holmes, N. (2004). The use of a process-oriented approach to
facilitate the planning and production stages of writing for
204
adult students of English as a foreign language.
Retrieved on July 25, 2005.
Hornby. A.S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary. Oxford
University Press.
Howatt, A.P.R. (1984). A History of English Language Teaching.
London: OUP.
Hymes, Dell. (1971). On Communicative competence Rpt. In Pride,
J.B. & Holmes, J. (ed), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth:
Penguin (1972).
Hymes, Dell. (1972). Models of the interactions of language and
social life. In Gumperz, J.L & Hymes, D. (eds) Directions
in Sociolinguistics: Ethnography of communication. New
York: National Council for Teachers of English.
Jayashree. S. (1989). Identification of the difficulties in teaching and
learning English as a second language among the high
school students. M.Phil., Dissertation Alagappa
University, cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research
Volume II, 752Pp, Baroda.
John W. Best , James V. Kahn (2001). Research in Education.
Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.
John W. Best., (1963). Research in Education. New Delhi :
Prentice Hall of India (Pvt), 107 Pp.
Johns, A.M. (1990). L1 composition theories: Implications for
developing theories of L2 composition. In B. Kroll (Ed.),
Second language writing: Research insights from the
classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joshi, A.N., (1984). Factors Influencing English language Abilities;
Mee. U.,
Joshi, V. G., (1975). A Study of Errors in Written English among
Pupils of Standards V to VII, A.E. Society's College of
Education, .Ahmednagar.
205
Kantawala, N.N., (1980). Investigation into the Reading Attitudes of
High School Students of Kaira District. Ph.D., Thesis.
SPU.
Kapadia, S.T., (1988). Development and try-out of programmes for
remedial teaching in English for the post HSSC level.
Ph.D., Thesis Education. Gujarat university cited in Fifth
Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 752-753Pp,
Baroda.
Kasper, L.F. & Petrello, B.A. (1996). Responding to ESL student
writing: The value of a non-judgemental approach.
Community Review, 14, 5-12 Pp.
Kathardekar, G.N., (n.d.). A study of basic Vocabulary of Students
Studying in standard VII, Ph.D., Thesis. Poona
University.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experimental learning: Experience as the source of
learning and development. London: Prentice-Hall.
Koppar, B., (1970). An Enquiry into Factors Affecting Reading
Comprehension (in English), Ph.D. Thesis., MSU.
Kothari, C.R., (2004). Research Methodology. New Delhi : New
Age International, Pvt. Limited, Publishes, 1 Pp.
Kothari. C.R (2004). Research Methodology. New Age International
Private Limited. Publishers, New Delhi.
Leech, Goeffrey & Svartvik, Jan. (1994). A Communicative
Grammar of English. London: ELBS (2nd ED).
Levent Uzun, M. Tugba Yildiz Ekin and Erdogan Kartal (2013). The
opinions and Attitudes of the Foreign Language Learners
and Teachers Related to the Traditional and Digital
Games : Age and Gender Differences. Volume 3, Issue 2.
2013. 21 pages.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
206
Mahmood Ahmad Azhar (2004). English language teaching, high
school level, Abbott bad, training course, teaching aids,
faulty examination, home assignments. (Institute /
University / Department National University of Modern
Languages, Islamabad), 1-216Pp,
May Lai-Yin Wong (2009). Perspectives on the English Language
Education of Hong Kong's New Senior Secondary (NSS)
Curriculum. Asian EFL Journal, Professional Teaching
Articles Volume 35, 1-20Pp, April 2009.
Meherunnesa. (2004). English language teaching. Learning through
Communicative Approach at the Secondary School
Certificate (SSC) Level In Bangladesh. Ms. Nesa is
Associate Professor of English at school of social
science, Humanities and language, Bangladesh Open
University, Gazipur. JoumsL of Netre Vol. 9, No. 1-2
December 2004.
Misra, J.N., (1968). A Study of Problems and Difficulties of
Language Teaching at Secondary Level, Ph.D. Thesis,
Sagar. University.
Mohanty, S. (1989). The effects of age, sex and individual
differences in language development of Oriya speaking
children. M.Phil., Dissertation Utkal University cited in
Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 759-
760Pp, Baroda.
Muncie, J. (2002). Process writing and vocabulary development:
Comparing lexical frequency profiles cross drafts.
System, 30, 225-235 Pp.
Nanda, Kamala. (1982). An investigation into the causes of poor
attainment in English 1 comprehension of the students of
Class VIII in Cuttack city and their remedial measures. . . .
Ph.D., Thesis, Sambalpur University cited in Fifth Survey
207
of Educational Research Volume II, 761-762Pp, Baroda.
Nasrin Shokrpour and Mohammad Hossein Fallahzadeh (2007). A
Survey of the Students and Interns’ EFL Writing
Problems in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
Volume 9. Issue 1 Article 8.
National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT)
(2000). National Curriculum Frame work for School
Education, New Delhi 2000.
Nelson, G.L. & Carson, G. (2002). ESL students’ perceptions of
effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of SL
Writing, 7, 113-131Pp.
Panda. S. (1991). Word-non-word difference in oral reading as a
predictor of reading comprehension. M.Phil., Dissertation,
Utkal University cited in. Fifth Survey of Educational
Research Volume II, 762Pp, Baroda.
Paramguru, T. P. (1991). A study on the development of concept of
the noun among boys and, girls reading in Class IX in
rural and urban areas of Cuttack district. M.Phil.,
Dissertation. Utkal University cited in Fifth Survey of
Educational Research Volume II, 763-764Pp, Baroda.
Patil, N.K. (1988). An investigation into the effects of anticipated
time of completion of a spoken word on its perception.
Ph.D., Thesis. University of Bombay cited in Fifth Survey
of Educational Research Volume II, 764-765Pp, Baroda.
Patnaik, R. (1991). The Role of knowledge representation and
planning in reading and writing. M.Phil., Dissertation.
Utkal University cited in Fifth Survey of Educational
Research Volume II, 432Pp, Baroda.
Patnaik, L. (1991). Orthographic Variation and Oral reading
strategy. M.Phil., Dissertation, Utkal University cited in.
Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II, Baroda.
208
Piepho, H.E. (1981). Establishing objectives in the teaching of
English in candlin, C.N. (ed.). the Communicative
Teaching of English Principles and an exercise Typology.
London: Longman, 765Pp.
Pradhan, S.S. (1990). A comparative study of the effectiveness of
the direct method and the bilingual method of teaching
English in Class X in the district of Cuttack. Ph.D.,
Thesis. Utkal University cited in Fifth Survey of
Educational Research Volume II, 765Pp, Baroda.
Prakash, P. (1988). Development of reading proficiency:
Relationship with metalinguistic awareness and cognitive
processing skills. Ph.D., Thesis, Utkal University, cited in
Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 767Pp,
Baroda.
Rajendran, M. (1992). Activity-centred teaching of English:
experimental study. M.Phil., Dissertation, Annamalai
University cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research
Volume II, 769Pp, Baroda.
Rajguru, Meghamala. (1992). Language proficiency and
behavioural information processing - A development
view. Independent study. Pune: Jnana Prabodhini
Institute of Psychology. (ERIC Funded) cited in Fifth
Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 769-770Pp,
Baroda.
Ram, S.K. (1989). A study on Survey of methods and techniques of
teaching English in class VI. Independent study. National
Council of Educational Research and Training. (ERIC
Funded) cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research
Volume II, 772-771Pp, Baroda.
Ramaiah, L.S. Communicative Language Teaching (A
Bibliographical Survey of Resources). Gurgaon: Indian
209
Documentation services, 1985.
Ramamoorthy, V. (1992). The Common spelling errors in English
committed by Standard VI students of matriculation
schools and remedial teaching Programme. M.Phil.,
dissertation. Madurai Kamaraj University cited in Fifth
Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 771-772Pp,
Baroda.
Ramkumar, V., (1982). Assessment of Entering Behaviour in
English of Pupils of Standard VllI. Department of
Education, Ker. U., 1982 (UGC-financed).
Rao, Ramachandra, K.; Nijalingappa, P. and Pillai, Swaminatha S.
(1988). The need for programmes to improve
communication skills of diploma students. Independent
study. Madras: Technical Teachers’ Training Institute,
cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II,
772-773Pp, Baroda.
Riazi, A. & Mir, F. (2002). Sentence combining plus (SC+): Its
effects on students’ writing quality and strategy use.
Academic Exchange Quarterly, 6, 231-236Pp.
S. T. (1988). Development and try-out of programmes for remedial
teaching in English for the post HSSC level.
Sankarappan, R. (1992). A study of some variables related to
achievement in English of Standard IX pupils in Madurai
District in Tamil Nadu. . . . M.Phil., dissertation, Annamalai
University, cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research
Volume II, 777-778Pp, Baroda.
Sarma, V.B.B. (1989). Designing a course in written English for the
high school stage: A communicative approach. Ph.D.,
thesis, Osamania University, cited in Fifth Survey of
Educational Research Volume II,777-778Pp, Baroda.
210
Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the philosophy of
Language Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sethi, A. S., (1976). A Study of a Programme in English Spelling in
relation to Visual and Auditory Presentation, Ph.D.,
thesis., HPU.
Shah, J.H., (1979). A Comparative study of some Personal and
Psychological Variables and Reading Comprehension,
Department of Education., Sau. U.
Sharma, Prasanta, (1989). A study on the prognosis of writing
abilities with the help of creativity and intelligence of the
students. Ph.D., thesis, University of Kalyani cited in Fifth
Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 780-781Pp,
Baroda.
Shashi, Mohan. (1991). The study on the role of aptitude, attitude
and motivation in English acquisition. Ph.D., thesis,
University of Delhi, cited in Fifth Survey of Educational
Research Volume II, 781-782Pp, Baroda.
Srivastava, A.K. and Khatoon, R., (1980). Effect of Difference
between Mother Tongue and Another Language as
Medium of Instruction on Achievement, Mental Ability,
and Creativity of the Eighth Standard Children, CIIL,
Mysore. University.
Subrahmaniam, V., (1981). A Linguistic Study of Language Skills
Attained in the English-medium Schools in India, Ph.D.,
thesis., Poona University, Pune.
Umar-ud-Din, M. Kamal Khan, and Shahzad Mahmood, (2010).
Effect of Teachers' Academic Qualification on Students'
L2 Performance at the Secondary Level. Language in
India. Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow
Volume 10: 7 July 2010.
211
Van Ek, J. (1979). The threshold level. In Brumfit & Johnson (eds).
Vasundhara D., Katyayani. R.K. (2008) “Methodology of Teaching
English” Published by Telugu Academy, Hyderabad.
Weissberg, B. (1994). Speaking of writing: some functions of talk in
the EFL composition class. Journal of 2nd Language
Writing, 3(1), 23-27 Pp.
Widdowson, H.G. (1995). Discourse analysis: A critical view.
Language and Literature, 4( 3), 157-72 Pp.
Widdowson, H.G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication.
OUP : London.
Widdowson, H.G. (1979). Direction in the teaching of discourse. In
Brumfit & Johnson (ed).
Wilkins, D.A. (1972). The linguistic and situational content of the
common core in a unit/credit system. Strasbourg: The
Council of Europe.
Z, N. (1990). A study of language creativity of Standard IX students
in relation to intelligence, teacher involvement, and
gender. M.Phil. dissertation, Bangalore University,
Bangalore.
Zhu, W. (2004). Writing in business courses: an analysis of
assignment types, their characteristics, and required
skills. English for Specific Purposes, 23(2), 111-136Pp.
Websites : http://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/etd/handle/123456789/3612
http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr.htm http://www.developingteachers.com
212
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Andhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, Visakhapatnam
Dear Sir/Madam, I am very happy to meet you to collect information and opinions
from you on my research work titled “A STUDY ON THE STATUS OF A STUDY ON THE STATUS OF A STUDY ON THE STATUS OF A STUDY ON THE STATUS OF
ENGLISH LANGENGLISH LANGENGLISH LANGENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS UAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS UAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS UAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS
OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICTOF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICTOF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICTOF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT”.”.”.”. leading to Ph.D., Degree.
The information given by you will be kept confidential and used for
research purpose only.
Research Guide Research Scholar Prof. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.Prof. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.Prof. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.Prof. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P. D. Sireesha KumariD. Sireesha KumariD. Sireesha KumariD. Sireesha Kumari
Students personal data Students personal data Students personal data Students personal data
1. Name of the student :
2. Name of the school & address :
3. Class Studying :
4. Sex : Male � Female �
5. Age : 12 Yrs. � 12-14 Yrs.� 14 and above �
6. Caste : OC � SC � ST � BC �
7. Religion : Hindu � Christian � Muslim � Others �
8. Type of Management : Govt � Private � Local � Others �
9. Locality of the school : Urban � Semiurban � Rural � Tribal �
213
Questionnaire for the studentQuestionnaire for the studentQuestionnaire for the studentQuestionnaire for the student
Please Please Please Please register your opinion register your opinion register your opinion register your opinion by giving by giving by giving by giving ���� mark in the box against each mark in the box against each mark in the box against each mark in the box against each item. item. item. item.
S.No.S.No.S.No.S.No. StatementStatementStatementStatement YesYesYesYes NoNoNoNo Can’t Can’t Can’t Can’t
say say say say 1. I learn English as parents also speak English
at home
2. I show interest in learning English
3. I understand English from T.V. channels.
4. I have friends interest in English.
5. I refer to English dictionary regularly.
6. I ask the teachers for doubts in English.
7. I refer to English to English dictionary.
8. I feel satisfied as our teachers teach English well.
9. I am always encouraged by teachers to learn English.
10. I have good library in my school.
11. I have interest to go to library.
12. I go to library regularly to read news paper.
13. I clarifies my doubts by teacher.
14. I like my English text book.
15. I do not fear to speak in English.
16. I participate in elocution and debate in English.
17. I listened to some speeches in English.
18. I like to speak in English.
19. I have English dictionary at school.
20. I like to speak in English with good grammer
21. I have sufficient hours for English in time-table
22. I work comfortably for English in the class room.
23. I speak English regularly at home.
24. I feel that English learning is not difficult.
25. I speak freely with my friends in English.
214
26. I can understand my teacher speaking in English.
27. I speak in English out side the English classroom.
28. I speak with good pronunciation
29. I can write letters without mistakes.
30. I speak with good accent.
31. I understand my teachers pronunciation.
32. I take help from my parents to do the home work.
33. I can read names of shops in English.
34. I can write a few sentences in English.
35. I improve my hand writing
36. I spend my time to learn new words.
37. I can write some sentences correctly by my own.
38. I improve my cursive writing.
39. I can fill the excises from the work book
40. I prepare my notes simply from text book.
215
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Andhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, Visakhapatnam
Dear Sir/Madam, I am very happy to meet you to collect information and opinions
from you on my research work titled “A ST“A ST“A ST“A STUDY ON THE STATUS OF UDY ON THE STATUS OF UDY ON THE STATUS OF UDY ON THE STATUS OF
ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS
OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT”.OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT”.OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT”.OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT”. leading to Ph.D., Degree.
The information given by you will be kept confidential and used for
research purpose only.
Research Guide Research Scholar Prof. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.D. Sireesha KumariProf. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.D. Sireesha KumariProf. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.D. Sireesha KumariProf. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.D. Sireesha Kumari
Questionnaire for the teacherQuestionnaire for the teacherQuestionnaire for the teacherQuestionnaire for the teacher
TeacherTeacherTeacherTeacher’’’’s personal data :s personal data :s personal data :s personal data :
1. Name of the teacher :
2. Name of the school & address :
3. Sex : Male � Female �
4. Age : Below 35 � 35-45 Yrs.� Above 45 �
5. Caste : OC � SC � ST � BC �
6. Religion : Hindu � Christian � Muslim � Others �
7. English Teaching experience : 5 yrs � 5 to 10 yrs � 10-15 yrs �
15 and above �
8. Educational Qualifications :B.A., B.Ed., � B.A., M.Ed., � M.A., B.Ed., �
M.A., M.Ed., �
9. Type of Management : Govt. � Private � Local � Others �
10. Locality of the school : Urban � Semi urban � Rural � Tribal �
11. What special trainings
undergone by you for teaching English :
216
Instructions:Instructions:Instructions:Instructions:
Here is a list of statements regarding the status of English
teaching in the secondary schools in East Godavari district. Please read
the statements in the questionnaire and tick (√) the appropriate choice
viz., Great Extent (G.E) Some Extent (S.E) Little Extent (L.E) Very Little
Extent (V.L.E.) / Not At All (NAA). Feel free and express your cordial
opinion.
Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher QuestionnaireQuestionnaireQuestionnaireQuestionnaire
S.No.S.No.S.No.S.No. StatementStatementStatementStatement G.E.G.E.G.E.G.E. S.E.S.E.S.E.S.E. L.E.L.E.L.E.L.E. V.L.E.V.L.E.V.L.E.V.L.E. NAANAANAANAA
1. English syllabus meant for secondary classes is appropriate.
2. Introduction of new vocabulary is satisfactory.
3. Teaching of grammar is satisfactory.
4. Preparation for regular teaching is adequate.
5. Drilling of grammatical items in the class is satisfactory.
6. Introduction of vocabulary items is satisfactory.
7. Production of sentences by the students is satisfactory.
8. Understanding of my spoken English by the pupils is satisfactory.
9. Acquisition of elements of language by the pupils is satisfactory.
10. Acquisition of subject matter by the pupils is satisfactory.
11. Announce the topic after motivating the students for the lesson is satisfactory.
12. Pupils responses during introduction of lesson is satisfactory.
217
13. Pupils listening and understanding in the classroom is satisfactory.
14. Pupils understand and use stress correctly.
15. Pupils listen understand and use pronunciation correctly.
16. Pupils identify the important facts and events in the lesson correctly.
17. Understanding of structures by the pupils is up to mark.
18. Construction of sentences from the substitution table is proper.
19. Participation of the pupil in the role play is satisfactory.
20. Introduce the active vocabulary by using presentation, practice and production steps is satisfactory.
21. Introduction of passive vocabulary using mother tongue is satisfactory.
22. Use of teaching learning material in the class room is adequate.
23. Introduction of words for pronunciation is used by students is satisfactory.
24. All the pupils listening to my model reading is satisfactory.
25. Loud reading using all the elements of language is satisfactory.
26. All the pupils listening to my loud- reading is up to mark.
27. All the pupils loud reading of the passage is satisfactory.
28. Response to the action Chains by the pupils is satisfactory.
29. Participation of the pupils in the discussion on the passage with the teacher is satisfactory.
30. Reading comprehension of pupils is adequate
31. Writing of pupils is up to mark.
32. Responses of the pupils for the teachers questions is satisfactory.
33. Answers by the pupils for the comprehension questions is upto
218
mark.
34. Pupils writing of answers to the exercises at the end of the lesson is satisfactory.
35. Pupils answering the assignments at home is adequate.
36. Pupils oral responses at the end of the lesson is satisfactory.
37. Pupils enjoying of the music of the poems is sufficient.
38. Pupils understanding of the style of the poet is satisfactory.
39. Pupils understanding the central idea of the poems is satisfactory.
40. Locating of the rhyming words by the pupils is satisfactory.
41. Locating of the picture words by the pupils is satisfactory.
42. Locating of the poetic words by the pupils in the poems is satisfactory.
43. Understanding of the significance in the poem by the pupils is satisfactory.
44. Understanding the rhyme of the poem by the pupils satisfactory.
45. Understanding the rhythm of the poem by the pupils is satisfactory.
46. Understanding of the moral of the poet by the pupils is satisfactory.
47. Recitation of the poems by the pupils is satisfactory.
48. Understanding the new words in the poem is satisfactory.
49. Chorous reading of the poem by the pupils is upto mark.
50. Individual reading of the poem by the pupils is satisfactory.
51. Ability to grasp meaning of words from the context is satisfactory.
52. Developing of language style by the pupils is satisfactory.
53. Developing of skimming skill of pupils is satisfactory.
54. Developing of scanning skill in reading is satisfactory.
219
55. Ability to write correct English by the pupils is satisfactory.
56. Ability of students linguistic skill is satisfactory.
57. Ability of students thinking and organizing of their own is satisfactory.
58. Students completion of work book exercises is satisfactory.
59. Conduction of remedial classes is satisfactory.
60. Correction of students errors in pronunciation is adequate.
61. Correction of students elements of language is satisfactory.
62. Activities like elocution and debates in the classroom is satisfactory.
63. Use of library for students is satisfactory.
64. Encouragement given by my headmaster in developing English is satisfactory.
65. Feed back from the students in the classroom to the teacher is satisfactory.
66. Use of classroom English is satisfactory.
67. Teach through direct method.
68. Use of translation method is satisfactory.
69. Use of Bilingual method is satisfactory.
70. Habit of reading regularly by students is satisfactory.
71. Transcription regularly by pupils is satisfactory.
72. Drawing of match-stick diagrams on the blackboard during lesson is satisfactory.
73. Practice of cursive writing by pupils is satisfactory.
74. Correction of punctuation in students writing is satisfactory.
75. Encouragement given for students and parents to speak in English is
220
satisfactory.
76. Writing of leave letters and other letters by the students is satisfactory.
77. Composition writing of students is satisfactory.
78. Written expression of students is satisfactory.
79. Description of things by the students is satisfactory.
80. Hand writing of the students is satisfactory.
221
ANNEXURE ANNEXURE ANNEXURE ANNEXURE ---- II II II II
AreaAreaAreaArea of the study of the study of the study of the study
This study was conducted in the East Godavari District of Andhra
Pradesh. Out of 657 secondary schools in East Godavari District, 250
schools were selected for the purpose of the study. The profile of the
District is mentioned below.
Fig. 1Fig. 1Fig. 1Fig. 1. Map of India. Map of India. Map of India. Map of India Fig. 2. Map of Andhra PradeshFig. 2. Map of Andhra PradeshFig. 2. Map of Andhra PradeshFig. 2. Map of Andhra Pradesh
222
Fig. 3. Map of East Godavari DistrictFig. 3. Map of East Godavari DistrictFig. 3. Map of East Godavari DistrictFig. 3. Map of East Godavari District