bibliography bibliography

25
198 BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Adhiambo, Monica. (2012) Selection and use of instructional resources in English language teaching in selected public secondary schools in Nairobi Province. Aggarwal, J.C., (1983). Land marks in the history of Modern Indian Education. New Delhi : Vikas Publishing House. Aggarwal, Kusum. (1986). A study of the effect of parental encouragement on the educational development of secondary stage students. Ph.D., Thesis, Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University. Ahuja, G.C. and Ahuja Pramila. (1988). Reading comprehension tests (with cloze and multiple choice items for Classes VIII, IX and X). Independent study. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages. Fifth Survey of Educational Research, Volume II. 738 Pp. Alavandar, R. (1992). A study of selected variables relating to English reading competency of high school pupils Ph.D., Thesis Annamalai University cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research, Volume II. 739 Pp. Allen, J.P.B. & Widdowson, H.G. (1974). Teaching the communicative use of Englsh. Iral 12/1:1-21. Altrichter, H., Posh, P. and Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work. London, New York: RoutledgeAtkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the post- process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(12), 3-16 Pp. Amy Cooper and Dawn Bikowski (2007). Problems in writing skills in post graduation level students, Volume 6, Issue 3 , 206- 221 Pp. Annie Vijaya Kumari. CH. (2001). Methods of Teaching English, New Era publications, Guntur.

Upload: vukhanh

Post on 10-Dec-2016

307 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

198

BIBLIOGRAPHYBIBLIOGRAPHYBIBLIOGRAPHYBIBLIOGRAPHY

Adhiambo, Monica. (2012) Selection and use of instructional

resources in English language teaching in selected public

secondary schools in Nairobi Province.

Aggarwal, J.C., (1983). Land marks in the history of Modern Indian

Education. New Delhi : Vikas Publishing House.

Aggarwal, Kusum. (1986). A study of the effect of parental

encouragement on the educational development of

secondary stage students. Ph.D., Thesis, Hemvati

Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University.

Ahuja, G.C. and Ahuja Pramila. (1988). Reading comprehension

tests (with cloze and multiple choice items for Classes

VIII, IX and X). Independent study. Mysore: Central

Institute of Indian Languages. Fifth Survey of Educational

Research, Volume II. 738 Pp.

Alavandar, R. (1992). A study of selected variables relating to

English reading competency of high school pupils Ph.D.,

Thesis Annamalai University cited in Fifth Survey of

Educational Research, Volume II. 739 Pp.

Allen, J.P.B. & Widdowson, H.G. (1974). Teaching the

communicative use of Englsh. Iral 12/1:1-21.

Altrichter, H., Posh, P. and Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers

investigate their work. London, New York:

RoutledgeAtkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the post-

process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language

Writing, 1(12), 3-16 Pp.

Amy Cooper and Dawn Bikowski (2007). Problems in writing skills

in post graduation level students, Volume 6, Issue 3, 206-

221 Pp.

Annie Vijaya Kumari. CH. (2001). Methods of Teaching English,

New Era publications, Guntur.

Page 2: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

199

Aparaj, S.M. (1991). A study of developing auditory abilities through

language exercises in teaching English as a second

language in secondary schools. Ph.D., Thesis. Shivaji

University cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research,

Volume II, 742Pp.

Badger, R., & White, B. (2000). A process genre approach to

teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160 Pp.

Bag Anjali. (1990). A cross-sectional study on the differential

aptitudes of the students in English. Ph.D., Thesis.

University. Of Kalyani, cited in Fifth Survey of Educational

Research Volume II, 743Pp.

Banatwala, Ayesha G. (1989). Exploring the relationship between

classroom interaction and uptake in, EFL (English as

foreign language) teaching classes in order to provide

better learning opportunities. Ph.D., Thesis. Shreemati

Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women’s University cited

in Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 743-

744Pp.

Baskaran, Herbert S. (1989). The impact of the remedial teaching

programmes on the common errors committed by student

of Standard XU in written English. M.Phil., Dissertation.

Alagappa University cited in Fifth Survey of Educational

Research Volume II, 744-745Pp.

Bhatia, K. & Bhatia, B. (2003). The Philosophical and Sociological

foundations of Education. Doaba House.:Delhi.

Bhatia, K. et al., (1986). Modern Indian Education and Its problems.

Hariana, Praksh Brothers Educational Publishers.

Bhatnagar, R.P., (2007). Reading in Methodology of Research in

Education. R. Lall. Public Depot. : Meerut.

Bhishikar, L., (1980). Experimental Analytical study of the

Acquisition of Reading Skill, Ph.D., Thesis., Poona

Page 3: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

200

University.

Brean, M. & Candling, C.N. (1980). The essentials of a

communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics

½ :89-112 Pp.

Brumfit, C.J. & Johnson, K. (eds) (1979). The communicative

approach to Language Teaching, ELBS : London.

Canale, M & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative

approaches to second language teaching and testing.

Applied Linguistics 1/1: 1-47 Pp.

Carson, J. (2001). A task analysis of reading and writing in

academic contexts. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.),

Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading writing

connections, Ann Arbour, MI: the University of Michigan

Press, 48-83 Pp.

Carter V. Good., (1972). Essentials of Educational Research

Methodology and Design. Second Ed. Educational

Division, Meridith Corporation: New York.

Chatterjee, M., (1991). Attention, coding and speech related

process of skilled and less skilled readers. M.Phil.,

Dissertation. Utkal University cited in Fifth Survey of

Educational Research Volume II,746-744Pp, NCERT,

New Delhi.

Chaudhary, U., (1979). A Critical Study of the Language Policy of

India in relation to the Educational Needs and Aspirations

of the Different Linguistic Communities of India, Ph.D.

Thesis., MSU.

Chelini, A.B., (1991). A study on Achievement of basic

understandings and skills through higher primary

education. Ph.D., Thesis. University of Mysore.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge,

Mass: MIT Press.

Page 4: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

201

Christine M. Robinson and Gerard M. Blair (1995). Writing skills

training for engineering students in large classes, Volume

30.

Dash. B.N. (2004). Teacher and Education in the Emerging Indian

Society Volume-1, Neelkamal publications, New Delhi.

Datta, P.C., (1982) School Children and Their Reading Habits,

Eastern India Centre for Mass communication studies,

Calcutta.

Deenamma, K.V, (1979). Verbal Barriers in Class-'room

communication, Ph.D. Thesis., Kerala. University.

Dewey, J., (1916). Democracy and Education. The Free Press:

London.

Di Pietro, Robert J. (1976). Contrasting patterns of language use: A

conversational approach. Canadian Modern Language

Review 33/1.

Duchardt, B., Furr, P., Horton, S. & McFerrin, K. (2006). A

Structured Analysis of Graduate Students’ Online Writing

Skills. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of

Society for Information Technology and Teacher

Education International Conference 2006, 1145-1150 Pp.

Education And National Development Report of The Education

Commission (1964-1966). NCERT, New Delhi.

Elizabeth Scott, M.S., (2009). How To Communicate: Improve Your

Relationships With Effective Communication Skills.

Fairclough, R. (1992). Language power. London: Longman.

Fakeye, David O and Yemi Ogunsiji (2009). English Language

Proficiency as a Predictor of Academic Achievement

among EFL Students in Nigeria. European Journal of

Scientific Research ISSN 1450-216X Vol.37 No.3 (2009),

Pp.490-495.

Page 5: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

202

Firth, J.R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics: 1934-1951. London: OUP.

Gabrielatos, C. (2002). EFL writing: Product and process. Karen’s

Linguistic Issues.

Gani, S. (1990). Phonological awareness and beginning reading.

M.Phil., Dissertation. Utkal University cited in Fifth Survey

of Educational Research Volume II, 749 Pp, Baroda.

Gaya,, Tushar Kanta. (1988). Listening: Its nature, skill and

training. Indian Educational Review. Vol. 23 (2): 149-156

Pp, cited in. Fifth Survey of Educational Research

Volume II, NCERT, New Delhi.

Good, C.V. Barr, A.S. and Scate, D.E., (1941). Methodology of

Educational Research. Appleton – Century Craft : New

York.

Goretskaya. Yevgeniya. (2007). Influence of alternative methods of

instruction on English learners’ achievements in northern

California school districts; University of Phoenix.

Gopi (1981). A Diagnostic Study of the Errors Committed by the

Students of Grade VI in Oral Reading of Hindi Language

and the remedial measures to improve upon them,

Alahabad.

Report of the University Education Commission (1948-49). New

Delhi: Ministry of Education, Government of India,1949.

Report of the Secondary Education Commission (1952-53). New

Delhi: Ministry of Education, Government of India,1983.

Report of the Education Commission (1964-66) on Educational and

National Development. New Delhi: Ministry of Education,

Government of India, 1966.

National Policy on Education. New Delhi : Ministry of Human

Resources Development. Government of India (1985).

Report of the National Policy on Education. New Delhi: Ministry of

Human Resources Development. Government of India

Page 6: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

203

(1986).

Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work.

Heineman Educational Books : London.

Grover. Santosh. (1991). An investigation Into the standards of

reading ability in English in Government and Central

schools of Delhi. Ph.D., Thesis, Jamia Millia Islamia cited

in Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II,

750Pp, NCERT, New Delhi.

Hale, G., Taylor, C., Bridheman, B., Carson, J., Kroll, B. & Kantor,

R. (1996). A study of writing tasks assigned in academic

degree program. educational testing service : Princeton,

N.:

Halliday. M.A.K. (1975). Learning how to mean explorations in the

development of language Edward Arnold : London

Halliday. M.A.K. (1969). Relevant models of language. Educational

Review 22/1:26-37 Pp.

Halliday. M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language.

Edward Arnold: London.

Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense

consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (4), 543-

572 Pp.

Haswell, Richard H. (1989). Change in Undergraduate and Post-

Graduate Writing Performance (Part 2): Problems in

Interpretation.

Hayland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more

autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research,

4 (1), 33-54 Pp.

Hilgard, E.R & Bower, G.H. (1966). Theories of Learning. New

York: Appleton Century-Crofts.

Holmes, N. (2004). The use of a process-oriented approach to

facilitate the planning and production stages of writing for

Page 7: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

204

adult students of English as a foreign language.

Retrieved on July 25, 2005.

Hornby. A.S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary. Oxford

University Press.

Howatt, A.P.R. (1984). A History of English Language Teaching.

London: OUP.

Hymes, Dell. (1971). On Communicative competence Rpt. In Pride,

J.B. & Holmes, J. (ed), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth:

Penguin (1972).

Hymes, Dell. (1972). Models of the interactions of language and

social life. In Gumperz, J.L & Hymes, D. (eds) Directions

in Sociolinguistics: Ethnography of communication. New

York: National Council for Teachers of English.

Jayashree. S. (1989). Identification of the difficulties in teaching and

learning English as a second language among the high

school students. M.Phil., Dissertation Alagappa

University, cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research

Volume II, 752Pp, Baroda.

John W. Best , James V. Kahn (2001). Research in Education.

Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.

John W. Best., (1963). Research in Education. New Delhi :

Prentice Hall of India (Pvt), 107 Pp.

Johns, A.M. (1990). L1 composition theories: Implications for

developing theories of L2 composition. In B. Kroll (Ed.),

Second language writing: Research insights from the

classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Joshi, A.N., (1984). Factors Influencing English language Abilities;

Mee. U.,

Joshi, V. G., (1975). A Study of Errors in Written English among

Pupils of Standards V to VII, A.E. Society's College of

Education, .Ahmednagar.

Page 8: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

205

Kantawala, N.N., (1980). Investigation into the Reading Attitudes of

High School Students of Kaira District. Ph.D., Thesis.

SPU.

Kapadia, S.T., (1988). Development and try-out of programmes for

remedial teaching in English for the post HSSC level.

Ph.D., Thesis Education. Gujarat university cited in Fifth

Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 752-753Pp,

Baroda.

Kasper, L.F. & Petrello, B.A. (1996). Responding to ESL student

writing: The value of a non-judgemental approach.

Community Review, 14, 5-12 Pp.

Kathardekar, G.N., (n.d.). A study of basic Vocabulary of Students

Studying in standard VII, Ph.D., Thesis. Poona

University.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experimental learning: Experience as the source of

learning and development. London: Prentice-Hall.

Koppar, B., (1970). An Enquiry into Factors Affecting Reading

Comprehension (in English), Ph.D. Thesis., MSU.

Kothari, C.R., (2004). Research Methodology. New Delhi : New

Age International, Pvt. Limited, Publishes, 1 Pp.

Kothari. C.R (2004). Research Methodology. New Age International

Private Limited. Publishers, New Delhi.

Leech, Goeffrey & Svartvik, Jan. (1994). A Communicative

Grammar of English. London: ELBS (2nd ED).

Levent Uzun, M. Tugba Yildiz Ekin and Erdogan Kartal (2013). The

opinions and Attitudes of the Foreign Language Learners

and Teachers Related to the Traditional and Digital

Games : Age and Gender Differences. Volume 3, Issue 2.

2013. 21 pages.

Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Page 9: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

206

Mahmood Ahmad Azhar (2004). English language teaching, high

school level, Abbott bad, training course, teaching aids,

faulty examination, home assignments. (Institute /

University / Department National University of Modern

Languages, Islamabad), 1-216Pp,

May Lai-Yin Wong (2009). Perspectives on the English Language

Education of Hong Kong's New Senior Secondary (NSS)

Curriculum. Asian EFL Journal, Professional Teaching

Articles Volume 35, 1-20Pp, April 2009.

Meherunnesa. (2004). English language teaching. Learning through

Communicative Approach at the Secondary School

Certificate (SSC) Level In Bangladesh. Ms. Nesa is

Associate Professor of English at school of social

science, Humanities and language, Bangladesh Open

University, Gazipur. JoumsL of Netre Vol. 9, No. 1-2

December 2004.

Misra, J.N., (1968). A Study of Problems and Difficulties of

Language Teaching at Secondary Level, Ph.D. Thesis,

Sagar. University.

Mohanty, S. (1989). The effects of age, sex and individual

differences in language development of Oriya speaking

children. M.Phil., Dissertation Utkal University cited in

Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 759-

760Pp, Baroda.

Muncie, J. (2002). Process writing and vocabulary development:

Comparing lexical frequency profiles cross drafts.

System, 30, 225-235 Pp.

Nanda, Kamala. (1982). An investigation into the causes of poor

attainment in English 1 comprehension of the students of

Class VIII in Cuttack city and their remedial measures. . . .

Ph.D., Thesis, Sambalpur University cited in Fifth Survey

Page 10: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

207

of Educational Research Volume II, 761-762Pp, Baroda.

Nasrin Shokrpour and Mohammad Hossein Fallahzadeh (2007). A

Survey of the Students and Interns’ EFL Writing

Problems in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

Volume 9. Issue 1 Article 8.

National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT)

(2000). National Curriculum Frame work for School

Education, New Delhi 2000.

Nelson, G.L. & Carson, G. (2002). ESL students’ perceptions of

effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of SL

Writing, 7, 113-131Pp.

Panda. S. (1991). Word-non-word difference in oral reading as a

predictor of reading comprehension. M.Phil., Dissertation,

Utkal University cited in. Fifth Survey of Educational

Research Volume II, 762Pp, Baroda.

Paramguru, T. P. (1991). A study on the development of concept of

the noun among boys and, girls reading in Class IX in

rural and urban areas of Cuttack district. M.Phil.,

Dissertation. Utkal University cited in Fifth Survey of

Educational Research Volume II, 763-764Pp, Baroda.

Patil, N.K. (1988). An investigation into the effects of anticipated

time of completion of a spoken word on its perception.

Ph.D., Thesis. University of Bombay cited in Fifth Survey

of Educational Research Volume II, 764-765Pp, Baroda.

Patnaik, R. (1991). The Role of knowledge representation and

planning in reading and writing. M.Phil., Dissertation.

Utkal University cited in Fifth Survey of Educational

Research Volume II, 432Pp, Baroda.

Patnaik, L. (1991). Orthographic Variation and Oral reading

strategy. M.Phil., Dissertation, Utkal University cited in.

Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II, Baroda.

Page 11: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

208

Piepho, H.E. (1981). Establishing objectives in the teaching of

English in candlin, C.N. (ed.). the Communicative

Teaching of English Principles and an exercise Typology.

London: Longman, 765Pp.

Pradhan, S.S. (1990). A comparative study of the effectiveness of

the direct method and the bilingual method of teaching

English in Class X in the district of Cuttack. Ph.D.,

Thesis. Utkal University cited in Fifth Survey of

Educational Research Volume II, 765Pp, Baroda.

Prakash, P. (1988). Development of reading proficiency:

Relationship with metalinguistic awareness and cognitive

processing skills. Ph.D., Thesis, Utkal University, cited in

Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 767Pp,

Baroda.

Rajendran, M. (1992). Activity-centred teaching of English:

experimental study. M.Phil., Dissertation, Annamalai

University cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research

Volume II, 769Pp, Baroda.

Rajguru, Meghamala. (1992). Language proficiency and

behavioural information processing - A development

view. Independent study. Pune: Jnana Prabodhini

Institute of Psychology. (ERIC Funded) cited in Fifth

Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 769-770Pp,

Baroda.

Ram, S.K. (1989). A study on Survey of methods and techniques of

teaching English in class VI. Independent study. National

Council of Educational Research and Training. (ERIC

Funded) cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research

Volume II, 772-771Pp, Baroda.

Ramaiah, L.S. Communicative Language Teaching (A

Bibliographical Survey of Resources). Gurgaon: Indian

Page 12: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

209

Documentation services, 1985.

Ramamoorthy, V. (1992). The Common spelling errors in English

committed by Standard VI students of matriculation

schools and remedial teaching Programme. M.Phil.,

dissertation. Madurai Kamaraj University cited in Fifth

Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 771-772Pp,

Baroda.

Ramkumar, V., (1982). Assessment of Entering Behaviour in

English of Pupils of Standard VllI. Department of

Education, Ker. U., 1982 (UGC-financed).

Rao, Ramachandra, K.; Nijalingappa, P. and Pillai, Swaminatha S.

(1988). The need for programmes to improve

communication skills of diploma students. Independent

study. Madras: Technical Teachers’ Training Institute,

cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research Volume II,

772-773Pp, Baroda.

Riazi, A. & Mir, F. (2002). Sentence combining plus (SC+): Its

effects on students’ writing quality and strategy use.

Academic Exchange Quarterly, 6, 231-236Pp.

S. T. (1988). Development and try-out of programmes for remedial

teaching in English for the post HSSC level.

Sankarappan, R. (1992). A study of some variables related to

achievement in English of Standard IX pupils in Madurai

District in Tamil Nadu. . . . M.Phil., dissertation, Annamalai

University, cited in Fifth Survey of Educational Research

Volume II, 777-778Pp, Baroda.

Sarma, V.B.B. (1989). Designing a course in written English for the

high school stage: A communicative approach. Ph.D.,

thesis, Osamania University, cited in Fifth Survey of

Educational Research Volume II,777-778Pp, Baroda.

Page 13: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

210

Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the philosophy of

Language Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sethi, A. S., (1976). A Study of a Programme in English Spelling in

relation to Visual and Auditory Presentation, Ph.D.,

thesis., HPU.

Shah, J.H., (1979). A Comparative study of some Personal and

Psychological Variables and Reading Comprehension,

Department of Education., Sau. U.

Sharma, Prasanta, (1989). A study on the prognosis of writing

abilities with the help of creativity and intelligence of the

students. Ph.D., thesis, University of Kalyani cited in Fifth

Survey of Educational Research Volume II, 780-781Pp,

Baroda.

Shashi, Mohan. (1991). The study on the role of aptitude, attitude

and motivation in English acquisition. Ph.D., thesis,

University of Delhi, cited in Fifth Survey of Educational

Research Volume II, 781-782Pp, Baroda.

Srivastava, A.K. and Khatoon, R., (1980). Effect of Difference

between Mother Tongue and Another Language as

Medium of Instruction on Achievement, Mental Ability,

and Creativity of the Eighth Standard Children, CIIL,

Mysore. University.

Subrahmaniam, V., (1981). A Linguistic Study of Language Skills

Attained in the English-medium Schools in India, Ph.D.,

thesis., Poona University, Pune.

Umar-ud-Din, M. Kamal Khan, and Shahzad Mahmood, (2010).

Effect of Teachers' Academic Qualification on Students'

L2 Performance at the Secondary Level. Language in

India. Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow

Volume 10: 7 July 2010.

Page 14: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

211

Van Ek, J. (1979). The threshold level. In Brumfit & Johnson (eds).

Vasundhara D., Katyayani. R.K. (2008) “Methodology of Teaching

English” Published by Telugu Academy, Hyderabad.

Weissberg, B. (1994). Speaking of writing: some functions of talk in

the EFL composition class. Journal of 2nd Language

Writing, 3(1), 23-27 Pp.

Widdowson, H.G. (1995). Discourse analysis: A critical view.

Language and Literature, 4( 3), 157-72 Pp.

Widdowson, H.G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication.

OUP : London.

Widdowson, H.G. (1979). Direction in the teaching of discourse. In

Brumfit & Johnson (ed).

Wilkins, D.A. (1972). The linguistic and situational content of the

common core in a unit/credit system. Strasbourg: The

Council of Europe.

Z, N. (1990). A study of language creativity of Standard IX students

in relation to intelligence, teacher involvement, and

gender. M.Phil. dissertation, Bangalore University,

Bangalore.

Zhu, W. (2004). Writing in business courses: an analysis of

assignment types, their characteristics, and required

skills. English for Specific Purposes, 23(2), 111-136Pp.

Websites : http://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/etd/handle/123456789/3612

http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr.htm http://www.developingteachers.com

Page 15: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

212

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Andhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, Visakhapatnam

Dear Sir/Madam, I am very happy to meet you to collect information and opinions

from you on my research work titled “A STUDY ON THE STATUS OF A STUDY ON THE STATUS OF A STUDY ON THE STATUS OF A STUDY ON THE STATUS OF

ENGLISH LANGENGLISH LANGENGLISH LANGENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS UAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS UAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS UAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS

OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICTOF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICTOF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICTOF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT”.”.”.”. leading to Ph.D., Degree.

The information given by you will be kept confidential and used for

research purpose only.

Research Guide Research Scholar Prof. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.Prof. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.Prof. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.Prof. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P. D. Sireesha KumariD. Sireesha KumariD. Sireesha KumariD. Sireesha Kumari

Students personal data Students personal data Students personal data Students personal data

1. Name of the student :

2. Name of the school & address :

3. Class Studying :

4. Sex : Male � Female �

5. Age : 12 Yrs. � 12-14 Yrs.� 14 and above �

6. Caste : OC � SC � ST � BC �

7. Religion : Hindu � Christian � Muslim � Others �

8. Type of Management : Govt � Private � Local � Others �

9. Locality of the school : Urban � Semiurban � Rural � Tribal �

Page 16: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

213

Questionnaire for the studentQuestionnaire for the studentQuestionnaire for the studentQuestionnaire for the student

Please Please Please Please register your opinion register your opinion register your opinion register your opinion by giving by giving by giving by giving ���� mark in the box against each mark in the box against each mark in the box against each mark in the box against each item. item. item. item.

S.No.S.No.S.No.S.No. StatementStatementStatementStatement YesYesYesYes NoNoNoNo Can’t Can’t Can’t Can’t

say say say say 1. I learn English as parents also speak English

at home

2. I show interest in learning English

3. I understand English from T.V. channels.

4. I have friends interest in English.

5. I refer to English dictionary regularly.

6. I ask the teachers for doubts in English.

7. I refer to English to English dictionary.

8. I feel satisfied as our teachers teach English well.

9. I am always encouraged by teachers to learn English.

10. I have good library in my school.

11. I have interest to go to library.

12. I go to library regularly to read news paper.

13. I clarifies my doubts by teacher.

14. I like my English text book.

15. I do not fear to speak in English.

16. I participate in elocution and debate in English.

17. I listened to some speeches in English.

18. I like to speak in English.

19. I have English dictionary at school.

20. I like to speak in English with good grammer

21. I have sufficient hours for English in time-table

22. I work comfortably for English in the class room.

23. I speak English regularly at home.

24. I feel that English learning is not difficult.

25. I speak freely with my friends in English.

Page 17: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

214

26. I can understand my teacher speaking in English.

27. I speak in English out side the English classroom.

28. I speak with good pronunciation

29. I can write letters without mistakes.

30. I speak with good accent.

31. I understand my teachers pronunciation.

32. I take help from my parents to do the home work.

33. I can read names of shops in English.

34. I can write a few sentences in English.

35. I improve my hand writing

36. I spend my time to learn new words.

37. I can write some sentences correctly by my own.

38. I improve my cursive writing.

39. I can fill the excises from the work book

40. I prepare my notes simply from text book.

Page 18: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

215

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Andhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, VisakhapatnamAndhra University, Visakhapatnam

Dear Sir/Madam, I am very happy to meet you to collect information and opinions

from you on my research work titled “A ST“A ST“A ST“A STUDY ON THE STATUS OF UDY ON THE STATUS OF UDY ON THE STATUS OF UDY ON THE STATUS OF

ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS

OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT”.OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT”.OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT”.OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT”. leading to Ph.D., Degree.

The information given by you will be kept confidential and used for

research purpose only.

Research Guide Research Scholar Prof. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.D. Sireesha KumariProf. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.D. Sireesha KumariProf. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.D. Sireesha KumariProf. K.P. Subba Rao Smt. P.D. Sireesha Kumari

Questionnaire for the teacherQuestionnaire for the teacherQuestionnaire for the teacherQuestionnaire for the teacher

TeacherTeacherTeacherTeacher’’’’s personal data :s personal data :s personal data :s personal data :

1. Name of the teacher :

2. Name of the school & address :

3. Sex : Male � Female �

4. Age : Below 35 � 35-45 Yrs.� Above 45 �

5. Caste : OC � SC � ST � BC �

6. Religion : Hindu � Christian � Muslim � Others �

7. English Teaching experience : 5 yrs � 5 to 10 yrs � 10-15 yrs �

15 and above �

8. Educational Qualifications :B.A., B.Ed., � B.A., M.Ed., � M.A., B.Ed., �

M.A., M.Ed., �

9. Type of Management : Govt. � Private � Local � Others �

10. Locality of the school : Urban � Semi urban � Rural � Tribal �

11. What special trainings

undergone by you for teaching English :

Page 19: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

216

Instructions:Instructions:Instructions:Instructions:

Here is a list of statements regarding the status of English

teaching in the secondary schools in East Godavari district. Please read

the statements in the questionnaire and tick (√) the appropriate choice

viz., Great Extent (G.E) Some Extent (S.E) Little Extent (L.E) Very Little

Extent (V.L.E.) / Not At All (NAA). Feel free and express your cordial

opinion.

Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher QuestionnaireQuestionnaireQuestionnaireQuestionnaire

S.No.S.No.S.No.S.No. StatementStatementStatementStatement G.E.G.E.G.E.G.E. S.E.S.E.S.E.S.E. L.E.L.E.L.E.L.E. V.L.E.V.L.E.V.L.E.V.L.E. NAANAANAANAA

1. English syllabus meant for secondary classes is appropriate.

2. Introduction of new vocabulary is satisfactory.

3. Teaching of grammar is satisfactory.

4. Preparation for regular teaching is adequate.

5. Drilling of grammatical items in the class is satisfactory.

6. Introduction of vocabulary items is satisfactory.

7. Production of sentences by the students is satisfactory.

8. Understanding of my spoken English by the pupils is satisfactory.

9. Acquisition of elements of language by the pupils is satisfactory.

10. Acquisition of subject matter by the pupils is satisfactory.

11. Announce the topic after motivating the students for the lesson is satisfactory.

12. Pupils responses during introduction of lesson is satisfactory.

Page 20: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

217

13. Pupils listening and understanding in the classroom is satisfactory.

14. Pupils understand and use stress correctly.

15. Pupils listen understand and use pronunciation correctly.

16. Pupils identify the important facts and events in the lesson correctly.

17. Understanding of structures by the pupils is up to mark.

18. Construction of sentences from the substitution table is proper.

19. Participation of the pupil in the role play is satisfactory.

20. Introduce the active vocabulary by using presentation, practice and production steps is satisfactory.

21. Introduction of passive vocabulary using mother tongue is satisfactory.

22. Use of teaching learning material in the class room is adequate.

23. Introduction of words for pronunciation is used by students is satisfactory.

24. All the pupils listening to my model reading is satisfactory.

25. Loud reading using all the elements of language is satisfactory.

26. All the pupils listening to my loud- reading is up to mark.

27. All the pupils loud reading of the passage is satisfactory.

28. Response to the action Chains by the pupils is satisfactory.

29. Participation of the pupils in the discussion on the passage with the teacher is satisfactory.

30. Reading comprehension of pupils is adequate

31. Writing of pupils is up to mark.

32. Responses of the pupils for the teachers questions is satisfactory.

33. Answers by the pupils for the comprehension questions is upto

Page 21: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

218

mark.

34. Pupils writing of answers to the exercises at the end of the lesson is satisfactory.

35. Pupils answering the assignments at home is adequate.

36. Pupils oral responses at the end of the lesson is satisfactory.

37. Pupils enjoying of the music of the poems is sufficient.

38. Pupils understanding of the style of the poet is satisfactory.

39. Pupils understanding the central idea of the poems is satisfactory.

40. Locating of the rhyming words by the pupils is satisfactory.

41. Locating of the picture words by the pupils is satisfactory.

42. Locating of the poetic words by the pupils in the poems is satisfactory.

43. Understanding of the significance in the poem by the pupils is satisfactory.

44. Understanding the rhyme of the poem by the pupils satisfactory.

45. Understanding the rhythm of the poem by the pupils is satisfactory.

46. Understanding of the moral of the poet by the pupils is satisfactory.

47. Recitation of the poems by the pupils is satisfactory.

48. Understanding the new words in the poem is satisfactory.

49. Chorous reading of the poem by the pupils is upto mark.

50. Individual reading of the poem by the pupils is satisfactory.

51. Ability to grasp meaning of words from the context is satisfactory.

52. Developing of language style by the pupils is satisfactory.

53. Developing of skimming skill of pupils is satisfactory.

54. Developing of scanning skill in reading is satisfactory.

Page 22: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

219

55. Ability to write correct English by the pupils is satisfactory.

56. Ability of students linguistic skill is satisfactory.

57. Ability of students thinking and organizing of their own is satisfactory.

58. Students completion of work book exercises is satisfactory.

59. Conduction of remedial classes is satisfactory.

60. Correction of students errors in pronunciation is adequate.

61. Correction of students elements of language is satisfactory.

62. Activities like elocution and debates in the classroom is satisfactory.

63. Use of library for students is satisfactory.

64. Encouragement given by my headmaster in developing English is satisfactory.

65. Feed back from the students in the classroom to the teacher is satisfactory.

66. Use of classroom English is satisfactory.

67. Teach through direct method.

68. Use of translation method is satisfactory.

69. Use of Bilingual method is satisfactory.

70. Habit of reading regularly by students is satisfactory.

71. Transcription regularly by pupils is satisfactory.

72. Drawing of match-stick diagrams on the blackboard during lesson is satisfactory.

73. Practice of cursive writing by pupils is satisfactory.

74. Correction of punctuation in students writing is satisfactory.

75. Encouragement given for students and parents to speak in English is

Page 23: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

220

satisfactory.

76. Writing of leave letters and other letters by the students is satisfactory.

77. Composition writing of students is satisfactory.

78. Written expression of students is satisfactory.

79. Description of things by the students is satisfactory.

80. Hand writing of the students is satisfactory.

Page 24: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

221

ANNEXURE ANNEXURE ANNEXURE ANNEXURE ---- II II II II

AreaAreaAreaArea of the study of the study of the study of the study

This study was conducted in the East Godavari District of Andhra

Pradesh. Out of 657 secondary schools in East Godavari District, 250

schools were selected for the purpose of the study. The profile of the

District is mentioned below.

Fig. 1Fig. 1Fig. 1Fig. 1. Map of India. Map of India. Map of India. Map of India Fig. 2. Map of Andhra PradeshFig. 2. Map of Andhra PradeshFig. 2. Map of Andhra PradeshFig. 2. Map of Andhra Pradesh

Page 25: BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY

222

Fig. 3. Map of East Godavari DistrictFig. 3. Map of East Godavari DistrictFig. 3. Map of East Godavari DistrictFig. 3. Map of East Godavari District