berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

46
SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION & PRODUCTION Lecture One ESPM 60 Environmental Policy, Administration & Law Spring semester 2014 DR. RUTH DOYLE

Upload: ruth-doyle

Post on 16-Jul-2015

111 views

Category:

Environment


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

SUSTAINABLE

CONSUMPTION

& PRODUCTION

Lecture One

ESPM 60

Environmental Policy, Administration & Law

Spring semester 2014

DR. RUTH DOYLE

Page 2: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

ABOUT ME

• VISITING SCHOLAR @ UC BERKELEY, PROF ALASTAIR ILES

• RESEARCHER & LECTURER @ GEOGRAPHY DEPARTMENT,

TRINITY UNIVERSITY DUBLIN, IRELAND

• PHD SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION & INNOVATION

(CONSENSUS PROJECT)

• ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS & PUBLIC

CONSULTATION CONSULTANCY

[email protected]

• www.consensus.ie @consensusire @doylertweets

Page 3: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

LECTURES 1 & 2: SCP INTRO

• What is sustainable consumption & production (SCP)

– Challenges & key issues of SCP

– Ecological Footprint – how much impact do we create?

• Case study – Food

– Trends in consumption

– Trends in production

• How to promote SCP?

– Policy instruments

Page 4: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

LECTURES 3 & 4:

BUSINESS & CITIZEN RESPONSES

• How can we encourage behavior change?

– Theoretical perspectives

– Examples of behavior change initiatives & communications

• What can businesses do?

– Greening existing businesses

– New business models

Page 5: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

PRODUCTION-CONSUMPTION CHAIN

Extraction | Production | Access | Consumption | Disposal

(www.storyofstuff.com)

Production-side Consumption-side

Page 6: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

THE CONSUMPTION EXPLOSION

$7 out of $10 spent on individual consumerism (i.e. 71% of US economy based on

consumerism) v’s 50% China

Page 7: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

CONSUMPTION & WELLBEING

The consumption paradox

• Correlation between income, consumerism and wellbeing reduces beyond a

certain point.

• As a society grows richer, there is evidence to suggest that social solidarity,

participation & community relations, essential for social and psychological

wellbeing become eroded.

• Despite a doubling of personal wealth over the past 30 years in the US

reported happiness has decreased from 35% to 30% (Layard 2005)

Page 8: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

PEAK EVERYTHING?

DEMAND PROJECTIONS

• Global economic, population & societal development trends

• “perfect storm” – food, energy & water resource scarcity

by 2020

• Concern has now widened from a focus on ‘peak oil’, to ‘peak

everything’ referring to impending declines in freshwater per

capita, climate stability, agricultural land, fish harvests, fossil

fuels, and uranium production” (Heinberg, 2007).

Page 9: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

According to Jackson

(2009), this would imply

an economy x15 its

current size @ economic

growth of 2% pa.

POPULATION:

9BN BY 2050

(UN estimate)

Page 10: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

50 million tones of toxic electronic

waste accumulate globally each year.

Estimated that 50-80% of the waste

collected for recycling in USA is

exported (UN, 2008)

USA = 5% world’s population, yet

consume 30% global resources, and

produce 30% waste.

.

UNEQUAL PATTERNS

OF PRODUCTION &

CONSUMPTION

Page 11: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

MEASURING CONSUMPTION

(Simms et al., 2009)

How much

bio-productive land

required for

consumption

Page 12: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

COMPARISON OF ECOLOGICAL

FOOTPRINTS

(Simms et al., 2009)

Page 13: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

TYPICAL FOOTPRINT

You can calculate your footprint here: http://footprint.wwf.org.uk/

Exercise for seminar / at home?

Page 14: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

GLOBAL ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS

Countries stretched to indicate per capita consumption - worldmapper.org

Page 15: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

WE HAVE A PROBLEM!

• “It does not take more than a simple act of insight to realize that

infinite growth of material consumption on a finite world is an

impossibility” E.F. Schumacher 1973 “Small is Beautiful”

“One planet living”

= key goal of SCP

Page 16: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

SCP @ UNCED 1992

“The major cause of the continued deterioration of the global

environment is the unsustainable pattern of consumption and

production, particularly in industrialized countries, which is a matter

of grave concern, aggravating poverty and imbalances” (Agenda 21 –

Rio UNCED Earth Summit 1992)

Assumptions:

1. Earth’s resources are limited

2. Environmental damage is linked to production and exploitation

of these resources to serve everyday consumption

3. Sustainable patterns of consumption need to be discovered,

promoted & encouraged.

Page 17: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

COMPARING FOOTPRINTS:

FOOD CONSUMPTION

1. WHAT DIFFERENT FOODS DO THEY EAT & WHY?

2. WHERE ARE THE FAMILIES FROM?

3. WHAT IS THEIR WEEKLY EXPENDITURE?

4. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THEIR DIETS?

Page 18: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2
Page 19: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2
Page 20: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2
Page 21: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2
Page 22: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

DIFFERENCES IN FAMILY

FOOD CONSUMPTION

• Food preferences – reflect trends that have emerged in the food

system & reflect local contexts

• Food miles – geographically dispersed chains of production, access &

consumption

• Packaging & Processing – large differences across cultures.

• Food stuffs – meat & dairy products v’s vegetables & grains, “luxury

foods” v’s “subsistence” – What is over-consumption?

• Food quantities, income expenditure

Page 23: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

SUSTAINABLE

CONSUMPTION

& PRODUCTION

Lecture Two

ESPM 60

Environmental Policy, Administration & Law

Spring semester 2014

DR. RUTH DOYLE

Page 24: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

PRODUCTION & CONSUMPTION ISSUES:

U.S. Food example

Page 25: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

DIVERSIFIED, TRADITIONAL FARMING

Page 26: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

INDUSTRIAL FARMING

- California, Central Valley – adoption of industrialized agriculture since

mid 19th century

- Intensive crop based agriculture = use of mechanical ploughing,

chemical fertilizers, plant growth regulators & pesticides

- Mechanization allows for increase in production, yet increases

environmental pollution - erosion and agricultural chemicals

- The share of intensive crops grew from 4% in 1880 to 80% by 1930.

Page 27: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

GEOGRAPHY OF SPECIALIZATION

Page 28: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

GEOGRAPHY OF SPECIALIZATION

Page 29: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

AGRICULTURE TO AGRIBUSINESS

TRENDS

– Reliance on external inputs: pesticides, insecticides & fertilisers (v’s

ecological services), fossil fuels & seeds. Creates dependency, emissions,

run-off and pollutants

– Monoculture: Farms specialise in particular crops or livestock

– Mechanised: Human labour replaced with machinery.

– Distance: Increased distance between production and consumption

(refrigeration & additives to keep food fresh).

– Large-scale, intensive farming: In 2007 in the US, 35,000 farms produced

60% total food output.

– Agribusinesses: E.G. 4 companies control over 83% of beef packing in the

US, 4 companies responsible for 51% of turkey production. Imposition of

standards

Page 30: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

WASTE

(Foodshift.org)

Page 31: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

WASTE: PRODUCTION & CONSUMPTION

http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/mb060e/mb060e02.pdf

Page 32: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

SCP REQUIRES ACTION

ACROSS SECTORS

Business

Society

Policy

Page 33: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION STRATEGIES

2000’s – SCP cast as a strategy for increasing the efficiency of natural

resource use (eco-efficiency and minimizing waste). Preventative &

precautionary approach

Page 34: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

HOW TO PROMOTE SCP?

Policy instruments (targeting producers & consumers)

1) Regulatory

Codes & standards that account for social & environmental implications of production

& consumption. Level playing field & accelerate change.

1) Economic instruments

Encouraging innovation in business & market operations – SCP issues

characterized as ‘market failure’

1) Informative / communicative / educative (*next week’s focus)

(REF: Geyer Alley & Zacarias-Farah, 2003 – ‘Policies & Instruments for promoting

sustainable household consumption’ Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 923-926).

Page 35: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

1) REGULATORY INSTRUMENTS

• Product design standards – e.g. minimum energy efficiency codes DOE

‘Building Energy Codes Programme’.

• Restrictions on products – e.g. pesticides – EPA.

• Bans - e.g. San Francisco - plastic bag ban & impending ban on plastic

bottles in city-owned property at end 2014.

• Labeling – requirements to reveal sustainability impacts (e.g. FDA food

labeling) or eco-standard regulation (e.g. EPA EnergyStar & WaterSense)

• Extended producer responsibility – take-back requirements

• Statutory targets – e.g. on pollution / emissions.

Page 36: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

2) ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS

• Eco-taxes – e.g. carbon tax – price signals, “Internalising externalities”,

pay per bag waste charges.

• Producer incentives & innovation funds – for sustainable business

operations

• Consumer subsidies – for environmentally friendly products (e.g.

energy retrofitting).

Page 37: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

Mas. FOOD WASTE BAN

Page 38: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

Responses

Page 39: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

WEAK V STRONG SCP

APPROACHES

Weak SCP

- Low regulatory intervention

- Voluntary action – individuals & market

- “Green consumerism”

- Efficiency focus – greening existing patterns of consumption.

Strong SCP

- Systemic approach – recognizes macro-economic issues & requires

multi-scalar governance

- Sufficiency focus - Need to reduce overall consumption –

“contraction & convergence”

Page 40: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

SUMMARISING KEY

CONCEPTS

• What is SCP? Production-Consumption chain

• Trends – peak everything, socio-economic trends

• Unequal levels of consumption – distributive justice &

questions of differentiated responsibility

• Food case study – industrialization of agriculture and food

waste

• Policy instruments – Regulatory & Economic

Page 41: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

CONCLUDING

• RETURNING TO HEINBERG (Peak Everything):

• “Present patterns of development….are clearly related to the

availability of energy and other critical resources. Once we

accept that energy, fresh water, and food will become less

freely available over the next few decades, it is hard to

escape the conclusion that while the 20th century saw the

greatest and most rapid expansion of the scale, scope,

and complexity of human societies in history, the 21st

century will see contraction and simplification”.

Page 42: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

STORY OF STUFF

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GorqroigqM

Page 43: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

NEXT WEEK…BUSINESS &

CITIZEN RESPONSES

• How can we encourage behavior change?

– Theoretical perspectives

– Examples of behavior change initiatives & communications

• What can businesses do?

– Greening existing businesses

– New business models

Page 44: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

READINGS

READINGS:

• Hinton, E. & Goodman, M. (2010) ‘Sustainable Consumption: Developments, considerations and

new directions’. Chapter 16 in Woodgate, G., and Redclift M. (eds) International Handbook of

Environmental Sociology (2nd edition) , London: Edward Elgar Publishing

http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/03/95/42/mike4.pdf

• Fedrigo, D. & Tukker, A. (2009) ‘Blueprint for sustainable consumption and production’, SCORE!

Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange

OTHERS

• Living Planet Report 2012

http://assets.wwf.org.uk/downloads/lpr_2012_summary_booklet_final_7may2012.pdf

• Geyer Alley & Zacarias-Farah, 2003 – ‘Policies & Instruments for promoting sustainable

household consumption’ Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 923-926

Web resources:

• www.wwf.org.uk

• www.ecologicalfootprint.com

• www.interdependenceday.co.uk

• www.thestoryofstuff.com

Page 45: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

In-class assignment No. 2

• Research what food companies are or aren’t doing to address

sustainability problems associated with their consumer products (for

example, Wal-Mart, ADM, Heinz, Chipolte, MacDonalds)

• What are the policies and approaches that companies use?

• Present in class on 29th April

Page 46: Berkeley sustainable consumption & production lectures 1 & 2

LA SURCONSOMMATION

Can watch at home. Just 6 mins!

http://vimeo.com/61094582