bairwmp update 1/7/2011 prop 84 planning grant proposal irwmp implementation grant proposal next...
TRANSCRIPT
BAIRWMP UpdateBAIRWMP Update1/7/20111/7/2011
Prop 84Prop 84
Planning Grant ProposalPlanning Grant Proposal
IRWMP Implementation Grant IRWMP Implementation Grant ProposalProposal
NextNext
Prop 1-E- Prop 1-E- Stormwater Stormwater ManagementManagement
Prop 84 –FutureProp 84 –Future
Plan Update schedulePlan Update schedule
BAIRWMP Plan ProposalBAIRWMP Plan Proposal Submitted September 27, 2010Submitted September 27, 2010 MMWD is applicantMMWD is applicant Grant request-Grant request-$842,556$842,556 MatchMatch- $569,761 ( ~ 40 %)- $569,761 ( ~ 40 %)
Cash- $210,494Cash- $210,494 In kind- $359,267In kind- $359,267
Includes- SVCSD -Groundwater planIncludes- SVCSD -Groundwater planSalt and Nutrient Management PlanningSalt and Nutrient Management Planning
$205k request & 50% match ( 25 % cash, 25% in kind)$205k request & 50% match ( 25 % cash, 25% in kind)
DWR action on Plan ProposalsDWR action on Plan Proposals Received 39 applications totaling ~ Received 39 applications totaling ~ $27 m$27 mDraft approvals- 29Draft approvals- 29Scores ranged from 32 to 53Scores ranged from 32 to 53Bay Area score- 43 ( cutoff 37)Bay Area score- 43 ( cutoff 37)
NC-49, SAWPA-45NC-49, SAWPA-45Recommend approval for $842,556 Recommend approval for $842,556 Paul Helliker sent letter on 12/23/2010 Paul Helliker sent letter on 12/23/2010 addressing commentsaddressing comments
DWR CommentsDWR Comments Workplan ( 12 /15)--…the plan is lacking when Workplan ( 12 /15)--…the plan is lacking when
it comes to substantiating the tribal outreach it comes to substantiating the tribal outreach effort, the regional description of land and effort, the regional description of land and water use, the description of DACs and ethnic water use, the description of DACs and ethnic groups, data management QA/QC, and the groups, data management QA/QC, and the technical analysis sources technical analysis sources
DAC Involvement (8/10)-..however, it’s not DAC Involvement (8/10)-..however, it’s not clear how they will be reached and how they clear how they will be reached and how they will be supported. will be supported.
Schedule(8/10)…One month for a final draft Schedule(8/10)…One month for a final draft and three months for a draft plan does not and three months for a draft plan does not seem feasible ..seem feasible ..
Budget (8/10)-but the supporting Budget (8/10)-but the supporting documentation for some of the plan tasks are documentation for some of the plan tasks are not fully supported or lack detail.-task 5(Salt not fully supported or lack detail.-task 5(Salt and nutrient)… and nutrient)…
Program Preference (7/10)- seven program Program Preference (7/10)- seven program preferencespreferences
Implementation ProposalImplementation Proposal ““Regional” projectsRegional” projects Reviewed by Project Screening Sub Reviewed by Project Screening Sub
committee-Evaluation of projectscommittee-Evaluation of projects
ScoreScore-BAIRWM Plan and DWR scoring-BAIRWM Plan and DWR scoring
– –IRWMP (28-46) + Cost/Benefit (15)+IRWMP (28-46) + Cost/Benefit (15)+
Preferences (10)Preferences (10) Decisions by BAIRWMP Decisions by BAIRWMP
Coordinating CommitteeCoordinating Committee Application due January 7Application due January 7
Changes /Actions since Changes /Actions since SeptemberSeptember SB 855 -SB 855 - signed by Governor -10/19, 2010… signed by Governor -10/19, 2010…
added $100 madded $100 m… in areas that receive water … in areas that receive water supplied from the Sacramento-San Joaquin supplied from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, eligible programs and projects shall be Delta, eligible programs and projects shall be components of an IRWM components of an IRWM Plan that willPlan that will help help reduce dependencereduce dependence on the Sacramento-San on the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta for water supply. Joaquin Delta for water supply.
DWR funding targetsDWR funding targets Added funds-$ 100 million –doubles total amount Added funds-$ 100 million –doubles total amount Instead of $15.3 m we will ask for $ 30.6 mInstead of $15.3 m we will ask for $ 30.6 m
Decision on lead- BACWADecision on lead- BACWA~ 4% of grant ~ 4% of grant
Prioritization of projects and target allocationsPrioritization of projects and target allocations
Proposals as of 1/3/2011Proposals as of 1/3/2011 Regional Recycling Regional Recycling Grant requestGrant request
($9.813 m)($9.813 m) Regional (Drought Relief &) Water Conservation Regional (Drought Relief &) Water Conservation
($ 8.953 m)($ 8.953 m) Regional Green Infrastructure Capacity BuildingRegional Green Infrastructure Capacity Building
($4.565 m)($4.565 m) Bay Area Wetland Ecosystem Restoration ProgramBay Area Wetland Ecosystem Restoration Program
($ 3.725 m)($ 3.725 m) Integrated Water Quality Improvement, Flood Integrated Water Quality Improvement, Flood
Management and Ecosystem Restoration in Bay Area Management and Ecosystem Restoration in Bay Area Disadvantaged CommunitiesDisadvantaged Communities
( $2.1 m)( $2.1 m)
Total-~ 29.2 mTotal-~ 29.2 m
RecyclingRecycling Total Request- $9.813 mTotal Request- $9.813 m
Match-$, 55,815 m (85 %)Match-$, 55,815 m (85 %)
Acre feet/ year- 3,210 AFYAcre feet/ year- 3,210 AFY
Costs- Costs- $53 m$53 m (50 years)- 2009 dollars (50 years)- 2009 dollars Benefits- ~ Benefits- ~ $ 108 m$ 108 m
Avoided alternative water supply project costsAvoided alternative water supply project costs Avoided potable water supply costsAvoided potable water supply costs ~ $1m- WQ avoided fertilizer costs~ $1m- WQ avoided fertilizer costs
Recycling ProjectsRecycling Projects CCCSD/Concord Recycled Water Project Phase ID- CCCSD/Concord Recycled Water Project Phase ID-
$1.03 m$1.03 m SRSD Central Dublin Recycled Water Distribution and SRSD Central Dublin Recycled Water Distribution and
Retrofit Project-Retrofit Project-$1.13m$1.13m
EBMUD East Bayshore Phase IA- I-80 EBMUD East Bayshore Phase IA- I-80 Pipeline Pipeline $.741m$.741m
MMWD Peacock Gap Recycled Water Extension MMWD Peacock Gap Recycled Water Extension $.5m$.5m
NBWRA Program – 4 projects NBWRA Program – 4 projects `̀ $ 2 m$ 2 m
SFPUC Harding Park Recycled Water ProjectSFPUC Harding Park Recycled Water Project $ 2.1 m$ 2.1 m
SBWR Industrial Expansion and ReliabilitySBWR Industrial Expansion and Reliability $2.312 m$2.312 m
NBWRA ProjectsNBWRA Projects
NMWD Novato North Service AreaNMWD Novato North Service Area
LGVSD Novato South AreaLGVSD Novato South Area
Sonoma Valley Stage 1Sonoma Valley Stage 1
Napa-NSH Stage 1 Napa-NSH Stage 1
Regional Water ConservationRegional Water Conservation
Total Request- $ 8,952,685Total Request- $ 8,952,685
Match $ 6,438,872 (42 %)Match $ 6,438,872 (42 %)Total- ~ $15.4 Total- ~ $15.4
mmAcre feet- 25,546 over 10 yearsAcre feet- 25,546 over 10 yearsCost / acre –ft- ~ $605Cost / acre –ft- ~ $6052009 costs- 2009 costs- $12.7 m$12.7 mBenefit- 10 year present value- ~ Benefit- 10 year present value- ~ $ 25 m$ 25 m
Water Conservation Water Conservation ComponentsComponents
Implementing AgenciesImplementing Agencies Alameda County Water District (ACWD)Alameda County Water District (ACWD) Bay Area Water Supply & Conservation Bay Area Water Supply & Conservation
Agency (BAWSCA)Agency (BAWSCA) City of Napa (Napa)City of Napa (Napa) Contra Costa Water District (CCWD)Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD)East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD)Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD) San Francisco Public Utility District (SFPUC)San Francisco Public Utility District (SFPUC) Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD)Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) Solano County Water Agency (Solano)Solano County Water Agency (Solano) Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA)Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) StopWaste.org and the Bay-Friendly StopWaste.org and the Bay-Friendly
Landscape and Gardening Coalition (Bay-Landscape and Gardening Coalition (Bay-Friendly)Friendly)
Zone 7 Water Agency (Zone 7)Zone 7 Water Agency (Zone 7)
WetlandsWetlands
State Coastal Conservancy lead-3 State Coastal Conservancy lead-3 projectsprojects
$3.725 m request, $16.53 m match $3.725 m request, $16.53 m match + other state funds ($8.9 m)-57% + other state funds ($8.9 m)-57% matchmatch
2009 annualized costs- 2009 annualized costs- ~$ 25 m~$ 25 m 2009 annualized benefits 2009 annualized benefits ~ $ 130 m~ $ 130 m
Wetlands-ProjectsWetlands-Projects1. Sears Point Wetland and Watershed 1. Sears Point Wetland and Watershed
RestorationRestoration
960 acres 960 acres $1.25 m request$1.25 m request, $9.8 m match, $9.8 m match
2. Bair Island Restoration2. Bair Island Restoration
878 acres 878 acres $1.225 m request$1.225 m request, $1.945 m, $1.945 m
3. Pond A16/17 Habitat Restoration3. Pond A16/17 Habitat Restoration
370 acres 370 acres $ 1.25 m request$ 1.25 m request, 5.5 m match, 5.5 m match
Green InfrastructureGreen InfrastructureTotal request-$4,565,881 Match- $ 4,615,892 (50%)Total request-$4,565,881 Match- $ 4,615,892 (50%)
Benefits-~ $397 k- surface water treatmentBenefits-~ $397 k- surface water treatment
~ $ 25K-water supply (Napa)~ $ 25K-water supply (Napa) San Pablo Spine and Regional Promotion of Green San Pablo Spine and Regional Promotion of Green
InfrastructureInfrastructure
$2.316 m request, $1.905 m match (45%)$2.316 m request, $1.905 m match (45%) Hacienda Avenue “Green Street” Improvement Hacienda Avenue “Green Street” Improvement
Project Project
$2m request, $ 2.623 match (57%)$2m request, $ 2.623 match (57%)
Napa Valley Rainwater HarvestingNapa Valley Rainwater Harvesting
$ 250 k request, $78,335 match (24%)$ 250 k request, $78,335 match (24%)
Integrated Water Quality Improvement, Integrated Water Quality Improvement, Flood Management and Ecosystem Flood Management and Ecosystem
Restoration in Bay Area Disadvantaged Restoration in Bay Area Disadvantaged
CommunitiesCommunities Total request- $2.134 mTotal request- $2.134 m Match- -$705 k - 33 %Match- -$705 k - 33 % Consolidation of prior proposals and Consolidation of prior proposals and
emphasis on DACsemphasis on DACs
2009 annualized costs-2009 annualized costs-$1.6 m$1.6 m
Benefits- Benefits- $ 2.1 m$ 2.1 m ( stormwater ( stormwater treatment- STRAW)treatment- STRAW)
Integrated… ComponentsIntegrated… Components1. Watershed Partnership Technical Assistance 1. Watershed Partnership Technical Assistance ( $150 k)( $150 k)2. Stream Restoration with Schools and Community in Disadvantaged 2. Stream Restoration with Schools and Community in Disadvantaged
Communities of the North Bay (STRAW)Communities of the North Bay (STRAW) ($200 k)($200 k)3. Floodplain Mapping for the Bay Area with Disadvantaged Communities 3. Floodplain Mapping for the Bay Area with Disadvantaged Communities
FocusFocus ( $712 k)( $712 k)4. Storm Water Improvements and Flood Reduction Strategies Pilot Project 4. Storm Water Improvements and Flood Reduction Strategies Pilot Project
in Bay Pointin Bay Point ($160 k)($160 k)5. Disadvantaged Communities Richmond Shoreline and City of San Pablo 5. Disadvantaged Communities Richmond Shoreline and City of San Pablo
Flood ProjectFlood Project ( $85 k)( $85 k)6. Pescadero Creek Watershed Disadvantaged Communities Integrated 6. Pescadero Creek Watershed Disadvantaged Communities Integrated
Flood Reduction and Habitat Enhancement ProjectFlood Reduction and Habitat Enhancement Project($100 k)($100 k)
7. Pescadero Creek Steelhead Smolt Outmigrant Trapping7. Pescadero Creek Steelhead Smolt Outmigrant Trapping ( $119 k)( $119 k)8. Stream Channel Shapes and Floodplain Restoration Guidance and 8. Stream Channel Shapes and Floodplain Restoration Guidance and
Watershed Restoration in San Francisquito Creek, East Palo Alto, a Watershed Restoration in San Francisquito Creek, East Palo Alto, a Disadvantaged CommunityDisadvantaged Community ($230 k)($230 k)
9. Steelhead and Coho: Bay Area Indicator for Restoration Success SF 9. Steelhead and Coho: Bay Area Indicator for Restoration Success SF Estuary Steelhead Monitoring ProgramEstuary Steelhead Monitoring Program ($379 k)($379 k)
North Bay ShareNorth Bay ShareProjectProject Funds Funds
requesterequestedd
North bay North bay shareshare
%%
RecyclingRecycling $9.813 m$9.813 m $ 2.5 m$ 2.5 m 25 %25 %
ConservatioConservationn
$ 8,953 $ 8,953 mm
? ($ 2.686) ? ($ 2.686) mm
~ 30 %~ 30 %
Green Green InfrastructuInfrastructurere
$4.566 m$4.566 m $ .250 m$ .250 m 5.5 %5.5 %
WetlandsWetlands $3.725 m$3.725 m $1.25 m$1.25 m 35.5 %35.5 %
IntegratedIntegrated……
DACDAC
$ 2.134 $ 2.134 mm
~ $620k~ $620k ~ 29 %~ 29 %
TotalTotal ~ $ 29.2 ~ $ 29.2 mm
~ $ 7.3 m~ $ 7.3 m ~25 %~25 %
1-E-Stormwater Flood 1-E-Stormwater Flood Management (SWFM) Management (SWFM)
grants grants ProjectsProjects-Manage stormwater runoff to reduce flooding and are ready, or -Manage stormwater runoff to reduce flooding and are ready, or
nearly ready, to proceed to implementationnearly ready, to proceed to implementation- Consistent with applicable Regional Water Quality Control - Consistent with applicable Regional Water Quality Control
Board Basin Plans, not be part of the State Plan of Flood Board Basin Plans, not be part of the State Plan of Flood Control and Control and
-Yield multiple benefits which may include groundwater -Yield multiple benefits which may include groundwater recharge, water quality improvements, ecosystem restoration recharge, water quality improvements, ecosystem restoration benefits, and reduction of instream erosion and benefits, and reduction of instream erosion and sedimentation. sedimentation.
-In IRWM Plan-In IRWM Plan
$ 212 m statewide competition$ 212 m statewide competition50% match, Max $ 30 m50% match, Max $ 30 m
Round 1 PSP-Addendum-January??Round 1 PSP-Addendum-January?? DWR WorkshopDWR Workshop
Bay Area- Bay Area- March 2March 2, 2011 1:00 P.M., 2011 1:00 P.M.1515 Clay Street, Room 2 Oakland1515 Clay Street, Room 2 Oakland
Applications due-5:00 p.m. April 15, 2011. Applications due-5:00 p.m. April 15, 2011.
Prop 84 – ImplementationProp 84 – ImplementationFutureFuture
Proposed funding recommendationsProposed funding recommendations
- April 2011 (tentative)- April 2011 (tentative) Final Grant AwardsFinal Grant Awards
-June 2011 (tentative)-June 2011 (tentative) Round 2 – Late 2011 ????Round 2 – Late 2011 ????
Plan UpdatePlan Update
Plan Update development Plan Update development 2011-->20122011-->2012
Draft PlanDraft Plan- August 2012?- August 2012?
Final Plan and AdoptionFinal Plan and Adoption Nov.-> Dec 2012Nov.-> Dec 2012