authors : t. bellet , j.c. paris , c. marin-lamellet (ifsttar – lescot)
DESCRIPTION
Older Divers’ needs and expectations concerning car driving Assistances: a Focus Group study among French drivers. Authors : T. BELLET , J.C. PARIS , C. MARIN-LAMELLET (IFSTTAR – LESCOT). Vienna, the 5th of June 2014 . Research Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Your logo here
OLDER DIVERS’ NEEDS AND EXPECTATIONS CONCERNING CAR
DRIVING ASSISTANCES:
A FOCUS GROUP STUDY AMONG FRENCH DRIVERS
Authors: T. BELLET, J.C. PARIS, C. MARIN-LAMELLET(IFSTTAR – LESCOT)
Vienna, the 5th of June 2014
To increase knowledge about French Older Drivers’ Difficulties when driving their own car
To Identify Older drivers’ Uses, Expectations and Acceptance of Driving Aids (Existing or Futures)
To Investigate potential Differences between Women and Men
In order to Identify and/or Specify future Driving Aids specifically adapted to Older Drivers :
=>S-ADAS : Senior Adapted Driving Aid Systems
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
2
• Focus Groups: involving around 5 participants (+/- 2)
• Total Duration : 3 hours (+ 2 coffee breaks)
• Individual Opinions were firstly collected by using Likert scales (from 0 % to 100%) : A kind of “Collective Questionnaire” (individual Grid) Avoid inter-individual influences in the group
• Collective discussions / debates (on overall issues), but supported by Individual opinions initially collected Similar versus Contrasted points of view
3
METHOD FOR DATA COLLECTION
DATA COLLECTION : LIKERT SCALES (FROM 0% TO
100%)
Question) Have you any difficulties to [example] when driving ?
AbsolutelyNot at All
0 % 50 % 100 %
Rather « NO » Rather « YES »
NEVER ALWAYS
0 % 50 % 100 %
Sometimes Frequently
Question) Could be [example of driving aid] interesting for you ?
Difficulties when driving:
Driving Assistance Interest / Utility:
4
5
METHOD: EXAMPLE OF INDIVIDUAL GRID
6
METHOD: INVESTIGATED TOPICS(125 ITEMS)
Sub-components of the driving task (90 items)Navigation : route planning and trip following (16 items)Speed control and speed limits respect (42 items)Intersection crossing (16 items)Highway Insertion and Lane Change manoeuvres (16 items)
For each of these topics : Difficulties: they met when they drive their own car Aid Needs: Uses (if existing) or Wishes (regarding future driving aids)
Interactions with other Road Users (20 items) Problems when interacting with specific sub-groups of other RU (6 main
groups: Motorcycles, Bicycles, other Cars, Trucks, Bus, Pedestrians) Aggressive behaviours from others and their Context of Occurrence
Vehicle Automation : Utility and Acceptance (15 items)
7
PARTICIPANTS Number: 30 Older drivers Gender: 15 Women and 15 Men Age: from 70 to 85 years old (Mean of 75 yo) Coming from a Representative Sample of 76
Older drivers of the Rhône area All of them have previously participated to a
driving experiment on open road (IFSTTAR Car) 6 Focus Group Sessions were organized
(in mean: 5 participants / session)
8
PRELIMINARY RESULTSFOR SOME DRIVING SUB-TASKS
DIFFICULTIES, ERRORS AND NEEDS DRIVING AID USES OR EXPECTATIONS WOMEN VERSUS MEN DIFFERENCES
(IF STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT, T-STUDENT TEST; P <0.05)
9
Difficulties to perform the Navigation Task (without aid) : Easy for Familiar Trip (5%), more difficult for Unfamiliar Route (34%)
Some difficulties to Find (34%) and then Read (33%) road signsAdaptive strategies: large part of them prepare their trip if they
have to use an unfamiliar Route (From Maps or via-Michelin/Mappy)
Driving Aid Uses and Expectations :69% of the participants have a Driving Aid for NavigationThey frequently use it (41%), also for familiar tripThey are highly interested by Future Navigation Systems
based-on Head-Up Display (72%) or Augmented Reality (75%) Women versus Men differences:
Significant differences for “trust in Nav. Aids” and “Self-Confidence”
NAVIGATION : DIFFICULTIES AND AIDS
USES/EXPECTATIONS
10
WOMEN-MEN COMPARISON FOR NAVIGATION: “TRUST IN DRIVING AIDS” & “SELF-CONFIDENCE”
Confiance GPS (N14) Confiance Soi (N15)0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
9079 81
6165
HOMME FEMME
Trust in Navigation Aids Self-Confidence for Nav.MEN WOMEN (significant lowest values)
11
SPEED CONTROL AND REGULATION:
DIFFICULTIES AND EXPECTATIONS
12
SPEED CONTROL: DIFFICULTIES(WITHOUT USING ANY DRIVING AID)
Respect limites (V1) Transg. Delib (V2) Transg. Invol (V3) Doutes/limite(V4) Diff Contrôle(V5)0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
To Know the current speed limit
To monitor their Car Velocity
InvoluntaryDeliberate
Attitude
Would like to
Respect Speed Limits
Main DifficultiesSpeed Violations
(If occurring)
=> Highly concerned while driving (76%)
Dif res
pect
50 (V
6)
Dif res
pect
30 (V
7)
Dif res
pect
90 ca
mpagn
e (V8)
Dif res
pect
90 pé
riph (
V9)
Dif atte
indre
90 pé
riph (
V9bis)
Dif res
pect
130 (
V10)
Dif. Ada
pt vit
90-70
(V11
)
Dif. Ada
pt vit
130-9
0 (V12
)05
1015202530354045
13
SPEED CONTROL: DIFFICULTIES / CONTEXT
(WITHOUT USING ANY DRIVING AID)
Urban 50 Km/H
Urban 30 Km/H
Rural90 km/h
UrbanHighway90 Km/H
Rural Change
70-90
Highway Change130-110
Highway130
Km/H
14
SPEED CONTROL AIDS: UTILITY ASSESSMENT
Inform
ateur
- Utili
té (V
14)
Avertis
seur
- Utili
té (V
17)
Limite
ur - U
tilité
(V20
)
Régula
teur S
imple
- Utili
té (V
23)
Régula
teurA
dapt
- Utili
té (V
26)
0102030405060708090
WarningSystem
SpeedLimiter
Cruise Control
AdaptiveCruise Control
InformationSystem
Active Systems(ADAS)
Information Systems
(IVIS)
15
=> Not any significant Difference
SPEED REGULATION:WOMEN VERSUS MEN COMPARISONS
16
INTERSECTION CROSSING:
DIFFICULTIES AND EXPECTATIONS
17
Si prio
ritrair
e (I1)
Si Non
prior
itraire
(I2)
Identi
fier R
ègles
(I3)
Réalis
er Man
œuv
re (I4
)05
1015202530
When having priority
When don’t have
priority
To identifyPriority Rules
To implement Manoeuvres
INTERSECTIONS : DIFFICULTIES TO CROSS
18
Perception Autres (I5) Estimer Vitesse (I6) Estimer Distance (I7)0
5
10
15
20
25
30
INTERSECTIONS DIFFICULTIES :
TURN LEFT AT CROSSROADS
To PerceiveOther Vehicles
To Assess Others’ Speed
To Assess Others’ Distance
19
Si prio
ritrair
e (I1)
Si Non
prioritr
aire (I2
)
Identifi
er Règ
les (I3
)
Réalis
er M
anœ
uvre (I4
)
Percepti
on Autre
s (I5)
Estimer
Vitess
e (I6)
Estimer
Distanc
e (I7)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
11 9
17
610
1513
18
30 32
24 27
3431
HOMME FEMME
Crossing when having
priority
Crossing with NO priority
To Identify Priority Rules
To Perform Crossing
Manoeuvres
To Perceive Others
To Assess Others Speed
To As-sess Oth-ers Dis-tance
DIFFICULTIES TO CROSS INTERSECTIONS : MEN-WOMEN DIFFERENCES
Left Turn at CrossroadsAll types of Intersections
MEN WOMEN (Significant Highest Values)
- Distance- Vitesse
Croisement dans 10 sec
BIP
PERCEPTIONSupport
GAP ASSESSMENT
Support
RISK DETECTION
Support
DRIVING AIDS AT INTERSECTIONS :
“LEFT TURN” SUPPORT SYSTEMS
20
21
INTERSECTIONS AIDS : PERCEIVED UTILITY
PerceptionSupport
Gap AssessmentSupport
Risk DetectionSupport
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
22
MEN–WOMEN COMPARISONS: AID TO TURN LEFT AT
CROSSROADS
Aide Perception (I12) Aide Créneau (I13) Alerte Risque (I14)0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
46 46
69
6051
59
PerceptionSupport
Gap AssessmentSupport
Risk DetectionSupport
But not any significant difference
MENWOMEN
23
INTERACTIONS WITHOTHER ROAD USERS
24
Motos (R1) Vélos (R2) Piétons (R3) Camions (R4)
Bus (R5) Voitures (R6)0
10
20
30
40
50
60
INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER ROAD USERS: DIFFICULTIES
Motorcycles Bicycles Pedestrians Trucks Buses Other Cars
REF. Value
25Motos (R1) Vélos (R2) Piétons (R3) Camions (R4) Bus (R5) Voitures (R6)0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
26
46
2721
9
23
58
51
32
49
32 31
HOMME FEMME
INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER ROAD USERS: WOMEN-MEN DIFFERENCES
MEN WOMEN (Significant Highest Values)
Motorcycles Bicycles Pedestrians Trucks Bus Other Cars
26
VEHICLE AUTOMATION:
ACCEPTANCE AND PERCEIVED UTILITY ASSESSMENT
27
VEHICLE AUTOMATION : ACCEPTANCE AND PERCEIVED
UTILITY
Vehicle Automation
Principle
Automatic Gear Box (Utility)
Automatic Parking (Utility)
Automatic Lane
Keeping (U)
Fully Automated Car (Utility)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70 Overall Acceptance
28
Navigation: Difficulties: Highest when Olders have to drive on Unfamiliar Routes Aid : High equipment rate, Frequent Use of GPS, Highly interested by advanced
Interfaces (HUD and Augmented Reality) W/M: Lowest values given by Women for Trust GPS & Self-Confidence
Speed Control: Attitude : Older drivers Would like to respect speed limits, and it is one of their
main concern when driving Difficulties to respect speed limits in Urban area (30 km/h zones), to be sure of
the current speed limit in road sections with freq. changes Aid: Frequent Use by 1/3 of them and/or high Interest for driving aids
Intersection: Difficulties: to identify priority rules & turn left at a Crossroads Aid: Utility of driving aids is well perceived (more particularly for Turn Left) W/M: Significantly assessed as more difficult by Women (= LC & Insertion)
Vehicle Automation: Good Acceptance of the principle, even if IVIS seems prefered Perceived as a way to Increase Safety and to Preserve their Mobility
CONCLUSION
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION