atr-72 500 brochure
TRANSCRIPT
DC/VE/M 2430/02June 2003
The New ATR Generation
ATR 72-500Responding to Market Needs
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 3
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SContents
■ ATR Program Overview ……………………….. 4
■ Worldwide success ……………………………… 11
■ ATR 72-500 outstanding features …………….. 19
■ Passenger appeal and comfort ………………… 23
■ Weights and performance………………………. 35
■ Commonality benefits …………………………… 51
■ Unbeatable economics………………………….. 57
■ Maintenance …………………………………….. 65
■ Customer Support ……………………………... 75
■ Conclusion ……………………………………….. 83
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 5
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SATR Integrated Company
Design, Engineering, Final Assembly Line, Purchasing, Marketing,Sales and Customer Support activities benefitting from the expertise
of two European leading aircraft manufacturers, EADS and Alenia.
Design, Engineering, Final Assembly Line, Purchasing, Marketing,Sales and Customer Support activities benefitting from the expertise
of two European leading aircraft manufacturers, EADS and Alenia.
C U S T O M E R S
ATR Shareholders
50%50%
50%50%
80%80% 100%100%
AERONAUTICA
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 6
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S EADS GroupThe World’s First Transnational Aerospace Company
Military AircraftMilitary Aircraft
EurocopterEurocopter
SocataSocata
Sogerma/EFWSogerma/EFW
50%50%
Military Transp.Aircraft
Military Transp.Aircraft Space SystemsSpace Systems Defence &
Civil SystemsDefence &
Civil SystemsStrategic
CoordinationStrategic
CoordinationAeronauticsAeronauticsAirbusAirbus
Airbus SCE
Airbus SCE
Airbus SCE
Airbus SCE
Arianespace
Arianespace
DassaultAviationDassaultAviation
ATRATR
EADS 2002 main figures■ Orders Eur 31.0 Bn (US$ 32.20 Bn)■ Orders Backlog Eur168.3 Bn (US$ 174.70 Bn)■ Revenues Eur 29.9 Bn (US$ 31.09 Bn)■ Workforce 104,000
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 7
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Finmeccanica GroupItaly’s Largest Producer of High Technology
Combat AircraftCombat Aircraft
Military TransportAircraft
Military TransportAircraft
Commercial aircraft
Commercial aircraft
AerostructuresAerostructures
HelicoptersHelicopters ElectronicDefence Sys.Electronic
Defence Sys.Underwater
SystemsUnderwater
SystemsSpaceSpace WeaponsSystems
WeaponsSystems Transport.Transport. EnergyEnergy ITIT
Eurofighter 19%
Eurofighter 19%
CommuterCommuter 50%50% ATRATR
AERONAUTICA
Finmeccanica 2002main figures■ Orders Eur 8.69 Bn (US$ 9.04 Bn)■ Orders Backlog Eur 21.70 Bn (US$ 22.57 Bn)■ Revenues Eur 7.81 Bn (US$ 8.12 Bn)■ Workforce 44,960
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 8
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SATR Family Evolution
StretchStretch New Generation
Maximum
commonality
1985 ATR 42-300PW 1204 blades 14SF5
1987 ATR 42-320PW 121
4 blades 14SF5“ Hot & high”
1995 ATR 42-500New engine :PW 127E
New 6-blade 568F propellerNew interiors - Advanced
soundproofing techniques“ Hot & high”
1989 ATR 72-200PW 124B
4 blades 14SF11
1992 ATR 72-210PW 127
4 blades 247F“ Hot & high” - Short runway
1997 ATR 72-500PW 127F
New 6-blade 568F propellerNew interiors - Advanced
soundproofing techniques
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 9
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR Family: the New Generation
ATR 7264-72 seatsATR 72
64-72 seats
ATR 4246-50 seatsATR 42
46-50 seats The only true familyin the 40-70
seats turbopropmarket segment
The only true familyin the 40-70
seats turbopropmarket segment
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 10
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S The ATR Family: Unmatched Versatility
■ Rough field version
■ Cargo version ■ Maritime Patrol version
■ Corporate version
01-009/31-02
■ Passenger version
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 11
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
The New ATR GenerationATR 72-500Worldwide success
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 12
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
Voted best aircraft
by Investors and Operators
Fourth consecutive yearVoted best aircraft
by Investors and Operators
Fourth consecutive year
The ATR Family: best value for moneyThe ATR Family: best value for money
ATR 42
The annual Investors’ and Operators’ Poll byAirfinance Journal, based on large a sample ofsenior management at airlines, lessors, banksand other financial investors, ranked aircrafttypes on the basis of five criteria:■ Investor appeal■ Residual value■ Remarketability potential■ Value for money■ Operational success.
ATR 42 and ATR 72 have been ranked in 2002respectively: First in the category of regionalturboprops by Operators’ Poll and First byOperators and Investors Poll, overall ranking,with the highest scores in residual value,investor appeal and value for money criteria.Airfinance Journal, September 2002
Product Attractiveness
ATR 72
1 1
2002 Operators’Poll -
Turboprops
2002 Investorsand Operators’Poll - Overall
Ranking
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 13
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SThe ATR Family : Worldwide Success
Asia PacificNorth America
Europe
Africa & Middle-East
Firm orders - May 2003
LatinAmerica
188188 282282
4141 5454
108108
Total ATR family673 Ordered a/c
from 87 Customersof which:
83 ATR 42-500114 ATR 72-500
Total ATR family673 Ordered a/c
from 87 Customersof which:
83 ATR 42-500114 ATR 72-500
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 14
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
AMERICAN AIRLINES
THAI AIRWAYS
AIR FRANCE AIR NEW ZEALAND KLM FINNAIR
BRITISH AIRWAYS
ALITALIA CONTINENTAL A/L
LUFTHANSA
ATR, the Major’s Favorite
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 15
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Breakdown of Orders
By Region By Variant
42%
28%
8% 6%
Europe
NorthAmerica
LatinAmerica
16%
Australasia/ Far East
Africa/Middle East
56%44%
ATR 42ATR 72
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 16
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S The ATR Family: Customer Preference
Sales since launch
■ Dash 8-Q300/-Q400 300
■ ATR 42/72 673
ATR : Worldwide recognition as the most successful turboprop family inthe regional market, by far the leader in the 40-70 seats category.
ATR : Worldwide recognition as the most successful turboprop family inthe regional market, by far the leader in the 40-70 seats category.
Sales since launch
■ Dash 8-Q400 95
■ ATR 72 301
Dash 8-Q300/Q400
30%
ATR 42/7270%
Dash 8-Q40024%
ATR 7276%
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 17
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S FEAMA 2003 Market Consensus(20 Years Regional Aircraft Delivery Forecast)
20-99 seat RJ’s : 5,712 a/c
15-89 seat turboprops: 1,047 a/c
Average annual delivery rate : 338 a/c
Turboprops Delivery Units per year: about 52 a/c
of which 80% in the 40-70 seats category(44 a/c per year)
20-99 seat RJ’s : 5,712 a/c
15-89 seat turboprops: 1,047 a/c
Average annual delivery rate : 338 a/c
Turboprops Delivery Units per year: about 52 a/c
of which 80% in the 40-70 seats category(44 a/c per year)
Turboprops will continue to play a vital role in the regional transport market.Turboprops will continue to play a vital role in the regional transport market.
Total of 6,759 a/c in the 15-99 seats categoryof which 15% (1,047 A/C) are turboprops.
Note: The FEAMA members include all the most important European airframes, engines, systems manufacturers and suppliers (extended as well to non-European as Bombardier and Embraer).
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 19
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
The New ATR GenerationATR 72-500Outstanding features
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 20
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SIntroducing the New Generation ATR 72-500
The ATR 72-500 incorporates:■ New cabin interior design■ Advanced acoustic treatment■ New propeller system■ Excellent field performance
offering all the commonality benefits of the proven andsuccessful ATR family and namely of the New GenerationATR -500 series aircraft.
The ATR 72-500 is the latestdevelopment of the ATR 72.It benefits from the in-serviceexperience of more than 640 ATRaircraft flying world-wide, with aproven average dispatch reliability ofmore than 99%.
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 21
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72-500Outstanding features
High level passenger comfort, excellent hot & high and short fieldperformance, low cost operations
High level passenger comfort, excellent hot & high and short fieldperformance, low cost operations
Wing and fuselage adapted to new operational weights
Wing and fuselage adapted to new operational weights
568F six-blade propellerwith electronic control
568F six-blade propellerwith electronic control
Common PW127 enginesand controls with ATR 42-500
Common PW127 enginesand controls with ATR 42-500
Advanced Noise interiortreatment
Advanced Noise interiortreatment
Composite tailComposite tail
Common cockpit/systemswith ATR 42-500
Common cockpit/systemswith ATR 42-500New landing gears,
wheels and brakesNew landing gears,wheels and brakes
New look interior
New look interior
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 22
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
27.050 m
(88' 9")
27.166 m( 89' 1.5")
7.65
m(
25' 1
")
10.77 m( 35' 4") 4.10 m
(13' 5")
8.10 m
(26' 7")
0.835 m
(2' 8.9")
Ø 3.93 m
(12'11")
WING AREA : 61 sq. m(657 sq. ft)
ATR 72-500General Arrangement
Dimensions
Overall length 27.166 m 89 ft 2 in
Overall height 7.650 m 25 ft 1 in
Wing span 27.050 m 88 ft 9 in
Wing area 61.00 m² 656.6 sq.ft
Entrance door 0.750 x 1.750 m 29.5 x 68.9 in
Cargo door 1.275 x 1.53 m 50.2 x 60.2 in
Service door 0.610 x 1.220 m 24.0 x 48.0 in
Emer. Type III 0.510 x 0910 m 20.0 x 36.0 in
Low loading sill (1.2m)Optimized propeller-fuselage clearance
Perfectly suited to operationson narrow runways
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 23
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
The New ATR GenerationATR 72-500Passenger Appealand Comfort
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 24
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72-500New Generation Cabin Comfort
■ New cabin interior design
■ Advanced acoustic treatment
■ New 6-blade propeller system
■ Enhanced air conditioningcooling capacity
➧ Passenger appeal and jet comfort
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 25
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72-500Cabin Layout Flexibility
■ The standard ATR 72-500 with front cargo door configuration consistsof 68 seats at a pitch of 31 inches, with a straight partition including afront cabin attendant station.
■ Two cargo areas are available:- Front cargo compartment: volume 5.8m3 (205 cu.ft)- Rear cargo compartment: volume 4.8m3 (169.5 cu.ft)
■ In the cabin, overhead bins are provided, offering 3.15m3 (111 cu.ft) forthe hand baggage
■ Other seating configurations are proposed, ranging from 64 seats at32” pitch to 72 seats at 30” pitch with a RH bayonet partition.
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 26
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SATR 72 Versatility
68 seats at 31” pitchwith A & E type galleys
70 seats at 31” pitch
A Attendant seatB Baggage compartmentCD Cargo doorED Entrance doorG Galley✕ Emergency exitSD Service doorT Toilet
72 seats at 30” pitchWith a RH bayonet partitionand A + D type galley configuration
Volumes 68 pax @ 31” 72 pax @ 30”
Baggage compartment 10.6 m3 (374.5 cu.ft) 9.4 m3 (332 cu.ft)Baggage per pax 0.156 m3 (5.51 cu.ft) 0.131 m3 (4.61 cu.ft)Total baggage 13.75 m3 (485.4 cu.ft) 12.65 m3 (446.5 cu.ft)Total baggage/pax 0.202 m3 (7.14 cu.ft) 0.176 m3 (6.20 cu.ft)
▲SD▲▲▲ EDCD
4.8 m 3
169.5 cu.ft
3 m3
106 cu.ft
2.8 m3
99 cu.ft
A
G
T
B
B
B
B
A
G
2.8 m 3
99 cu.ft
▲SD▲
▲▲
EDCD
4.8 m3
169.5 cu.ft
1.8 m3
63.5 cu.ft
A
G
T
B
B
A
SD
RDCD
4.8 m3
169.5 cu.ft2.8 m3
99 cu.ft
A
G
T
B
B
B
A
G
1.8 m3
63.5 cu.ftB
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 27
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72-500: the widest cross-sectionin the market
Space and ComfortSpace and Comfort
Ease of movementalong the cabinA handrail is incorporatedon the edge of the overhead bins.
Widest aisle in its class
Large overhead luggage bins
(2-meter long, 47 liters per pax)
Large overhead luggage bins
(2-meter long, 47 liters per pax)
Wide floor(more leg room and
comfort when sitting on a window seat )
Wide floor(more leg room and
comfort when sitting on a window seat )
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 28
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SNew Cabin Design
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 29
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
■ Stiffening of eight frames located in thepropeller area and installation of DynamicVibration Absorbers on the upper side of theframes and on the floor beams, greatlyreducing the transmission of noise generatedby the propeller blades
■ Skin damping treatment throughviscomaterial strips on the panels, reducingnoise propagation by the skin.
■ Stiffening of eight frames located in thepropeller area and installation of DynamicVibration Absorbers on the upper side of theframes and on the floor beams, greatlyreducing the transmission of noise generatedby the propeller blades
■ Skin damping treatment throughviscomaterial strips on the panels, reducingnoise propagation by the skin.
■ Attachment of the panels and overhead binsto the structure by specially designed dampers,avoiding transmission of vibrations from thestructure to the interior furnishings
■ Cabin partitions treated to reducereverberation phenomena in the forward andrear cabin area
■ New insulation blankets with an optimizedthickness and made of waterproof material
■ Parasitic noise sources (coming from outflowvalves, air conditioning recirculation fans andfrom hydraulic pumps) have been treated.
■ Attachment of the panels and overhead binsto the structure by specially designed dampers,avoiding transmission of vibrations from thestructure to the interior furnishings
■ Cabin partitions treated to reducereverberation phenomena in the forward andrear cabin area
■ New insulation blankets with an optimizedthickness and made of waterproof material
■ Parasitic noise sources (coming from outflowvalves, air conditioning recirculation fans andfrom hydraulic pumps) have been treated.
Increased passenger comfortIncreased passenger comfort
ATR 72-500Advanced Acoustic Treatment
Passive treatment of the cabininteriorPassive treatment of the cabininterior Acoustic structural treatmentAcoustic structural treatment
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 30
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
Silence and comfortSilence and comfort
ATR 72-500Quiet Cabin Features
Acoustic treatment of structure■ Dynamic vibration absorbers■ Stiffened frames ■ Skin damping
Acoustic treatment of structure■ Dynamic vibration absorbers■ Stiffened frames ■ Skin damping
■ Suppression of parasiticnoise sources in the cabin
■ Passive treatment of cabin interior
■ Suppression of parasiticnoise sources in the cabin
■ Passive treatment of cabin interior
■ New 6-blade propeller with electronic control
■ New 6-blade propeller with electronic control
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 31
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
It features:■ New PEC (Propeller Electronic Control)■ New PVM (Propeller Valve Module),
ensuring:■ Very accurate propeller speed and phase control (± 1
RPM speed and ± 1° phase holding)■ Optimum synchrophasing between the two propellers,
and resulting in:■ Optimum comfort even in turbulence.
568F Propeller System
The new 568F six-blade Hamilton Standard propeller isspecially optimized for:low cabin noise in climb and cruise and low vibration.
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 32
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72-500Environment Friendly
ATR 42-500ATR 72-500ICAO/FAA limit
70
80
90
Take-Off Sideline Approach
EPNdB
Certificated noise levels
Extremely quiet neighbour (26.6 EPNdB below Stage III FAA and Ch. 3 ICAO limits):thanks to the high technology ATR propeller system
Extremely quiet neighbour (26.6 EPNdB below Stage III FAA and Ch. 3 ICAO limits):thanks to the high technology ATR propeller system
■ Beyond cabin comfort, the HS568F propellersystem is instrumental in reducing the outsidenoise.
■ The cumulated margin versus ICAO Annex 16Chapter 3 outside noise requirements is aremarkable 26.6 EPNdB, making the ATR 72-500 one of the quietest in the industry.
■ Largely compliant to Chapter 4 requirements
■ Extremely low fuel burn and emissions alsocontribute to make the ATR 42-500 reallyenvironment friendly.
568F propeller systemreducing outside noise
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 33
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72-500Standard Improvements
The following equipment or improvements, optional in the previous ATR version,are integrated in the standard configuration of the ATR 72-500:
■ MTOW increase (22,000 kg - 48,501 lb)■ MZFW increase (20,000 kg - 44,092 lb)■ MRW (22,170 kg - 48,876 lb) and MLW increase■ Passenger tape reproducer■ Toilet occupied sign■ DC galley power supply■ In-arm tables for front seats■ Forward cargo net attachment improvement■ 5th shelf installation in the avionics rack■ 2nd DME Collins mode S provision■ Collins RadioCom/RadioNav equipment■ Replace Collins ATC’s by Collins ATC’s mode S■ 2nd ATC Collins mode S provision■ Collins VHF - neutralize “Simul Com” function■ One Collins mode S transponder installation■ Water repellent addition■ Double ignition system
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 35
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
The New ATR GenerationATR 72-500Weights and Performance
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 36
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Lower Weights for IncreasedEfficiency
ATR 42 and ATR 72 secondary structures are extensively made of compositematerial, which are not subject to corrosion.In addition, the ATR 72 innovates by the use of carbon fiber for its outer wings and acomposite tail, thus reducing weight further.
The in-service advantages of composites are numerous:■ Immunity to corrosion and fatigue■ Reduction of inspection■ Payload gain and fuel savings.
Not including the commercial furnishing weight, the corresponding result for theATR 72 can be summarized as follows:
= 19%
Weight saving 400 kg = equivalent to 4 pax
Composite
Total structure
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 37
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72-500Composite Materials
51-047/35-96
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 38
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SATR 72-500Operating Weights
Basic Option
Maximum Ramp weight 22,170 kg 48,876 lb 22,670 kg 49,978 lb
Maximum take-off weight 22,000 kg 48,501 lb 22,500 kg 49,604 lb
Maximum landing weight 21,850 kg 48,171 lb 22,350 kg 49,272 lb
Max zero fuel weight 20,000 kg 44,092 lb 20,300 kg* 44,753 lb
Operational Empty Weight 12,950 kg 28,550 lb 12,950 kg 28,550 lb
Maximum payload 7,050 kg 15,542 lb 7,350 kg 16,203 lb
Maximum fuel load 5,000 kg 11,023 lb 5,000 kg 11,023 lb
Basic Option
Maximum Ramp weight 22,170 kg 48,876 lb 22,670 kg 49,978 lb
Maximum take-off weight 22,000 kg 48,501 lb 22,500 kg 49,604 lb
Maximum landing weight 21,850 kg 48,171 lb 22,350 kg 49,272 lb
Max zero fuel weight 20,000 kg 44,092 lb 20,300 kg* 44,753 lb
Operational Empty Weight 12,950 kg 28,550 lb 12,950 kg 28,550 lb
Maximum payload 7,050 kg 15,542 lb 7,350 kg 16,203 lb
Maximum fuel load 5,000 kg 11,023 lb 5,000 kg 11,023 lb
* MZFW extension to 20,500 kg (45,194 lb) on option
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 39
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
PW127FTake-off power 2,475 SHPTake-off power (one engine out) 2,750 SHPPropeller (Hamilton Standard) 568F
Main technicalcharacteristics■ Two centrifugal compressors■ Free turbine, three concentric shafts■ Electronic and hydro-mechanical
controls
Advantages■ Simple, economic, easy to maintain■ Low specific fuel consumption■ Compliance with today’s and future
noise levels regulations
ATR 72Powered by PW100 Family Engines
Perfectly adapted to commuter requirementsPerfectly adapted to commuter requirements
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 40
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SATR: Propeller Brake Principle
■ The ATR aircraft benefit from aneconomic and efficient concept:the Hotel Mode.
■ The right hand engine is equippedwith a propeller brake installed onthe reduction gear box.
■ Used only on the ground, thisbrake locks the propeller while,thanks to the three-concentricshaft design of the engine, theLP/HP spools continue to runproviding the aircraft withelectrical DC power and bleed airfor the air conditioning system.
The Hotel Mode provides all the facilities and all the benefits of an APU at a fraction of the costand with less weight, offering to the operators a greater operational flexibility.
The Hotel Mode provides all the facilities and all the benefits of an APU at a fraction of the costand with less weight, offering to the operators a greater operational flexibility.
Hotel ModeHotel Mode
REDUCTIONGEAR BOX
FREE POWERTURBINE
PROPELLER
APU
AIRCONDITIONING
DCPOWER
HP SPOOL
LPSPOOL
PROP BRAKE
PROPELLER BRAKECONTROL PANEL
UNLK READYPROPBRK
ON
OFF
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 41
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
Hotel Mode/APU Comparison
■ It is lighter than the APU.
■ It is economic
■ It can be maintained at low cost.
■ It has no effect on the engine life at ground idle.
■ It is installed as basic fit on the ATR 42 and ATR 72.
The propeller brake represents the best compromise for theoperators because:
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 42
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
Propeller Brake ground idle utilization APU (rear mounted)
Weight 22 lb (basic on ATR) 330 to 400 lb
C.G. No effect Loading constraints
Acquisition cost Basic on ATR 275,000 US $
Fuel consumption 240 lb/hr 210 lb/hr
Maintenance cost 1.6 $/cycle 4.87 $/cycle(*)
Yearly cost 11,800 US$ 43,000 US$
Savings with a propeller brake: -31,200 US$ annually/aircraft
Propeller Brake ground idle utilization APU (rear mounted)
Weight 22 lb (basic on ATR) 330 to 400 lb
C.G. No effect Loading constraints
Acquisition cost Basic on ATR 275,000 US $
Fuel consumption 240 lb/hr 210 lb/hr
Maintenance cost 1.6 $/cycle 4.87 $/cycle(*)
Yearly cost 11,800 US$ 43,000 US$
Savings with a propeller brake: -31,200 US$ annually/aircraft
Assumptions- 1500 cycles per year, average cycle 15 min- Fuel price 0.7$ per US gal.- APU amortization: 10 years, no residual value- No allowance for APU weight induced extra fuel consumption or payload reduction- (*) Source: Bombardier - APU (20 min. duty cycle); 14,63 $ per APU operating hour
Propeller Brake vs APU
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 43
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
A present value saving for a fleet of2 ATR 72-500 with a propeller brake will be:
US$ 418,710 or
A present value saving for a fleet of2 ATR 72-500 with a propeller brake will be:
US$ 418,710 or
Present value of savings with a Propeller Brake
■ 10-year period■ Interest rate: 8%■ Annual savings : US $ 31,200 per aircraft■ 2 aircraft fleet
US$ 209,355 / aircraftUS$ 209,355 / aircraft
Propeller Brake vs APU
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 44
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SATR 72-500Performance
With basic weights With optional weights
Balanced Take-off F.L.✔ ISA - Sea level - MTOW 1,223 m 4,012 ft 1,290 m 4,232 ft✔ ISA - Sea level - TOW for 300 NM* 1,079 m 3,540 ft 1,079 m 3,540 ft✔ ISA +10°C - 3,000 ft 1,300 m 4,265 ft 1,300 m 4,265 ft
TOW for 300 NM*
Landing Field Length 1,048 m 3,438 ft 1,067 m 3,500 ftSea level - MLW
Max cruise speed 276 kt 275 kt97% MTOW - ISA - 16,000 ft
Net single engine ceiling 10,000 ft 9,800 ft97% MTOW - ISA +10°C
With basic weights With optional weights
Balanced Take-off F.L.✔ ISA - Sea level - MTOW 1,223 m 4,012 ft 1,290 m 4,232 ft✔ ISA - Sea level - TOW for 300 NM* 1,079 m 3,540 ft 1,079 m 3,540 ft✔ ISA +10°C - 3,000 ft 1,300 m 4,265 ft 1,300 m 4,265 ft
TOW for 300 NM*
Landing Field Length 1,048 m 3,438 ft 1,067 m 3,500 ftSea level - MLW
Max cruise speed 276 kt 275 kt97% MTOW - ISA - 16,000 ft
Net single engine ceiling 10,000 ft 9,800 ft97% MTOW - ISA +10°C
* 68 pax @ 95kg/209 lb
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 45
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72-500Payload/Range
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 200 400 600 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Range (nm)
Payload (kg)
Optional weights68 passengers @ 95 kg
715
Basic weights
890
OEW 12,950 kg (28,550 lb)High cruise speedReserves 45 mn continued cruise& 87 nm alternate
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 46
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Multi Hop CapabilityATR 72-500 - Basic WeightsISA - No Wind - 68 pax at 95 kg (209 lb)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 NM800
150 NM
200 NM
OUT & RETURN
NOMINAL RANGE
100 NM
3 HOPS
4 HOPS
715 NM
5 HOPS
330 NM
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 47
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SMulti-Hop CapabilityATR 72-500 - Optional WeightsISA - No Wind - 68 pax at 95 kg (209 lb)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 NM800
150 NM
200 NM
OUT & RETURN
NOMINAL RANGE
100 NM
4 HOPS
5 HOPS
6 HOPS
420 NM
890 NM
900 1000
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 48
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SThe ATR Family: Unrestricted Operations
■ ETOPS capability
■ Operations from airfields located at upto 11,000 ft altitude
■ Stretcher transportation capability
■ Extreme cold weather certification(-52°C)
■ Steep approach capability with performancecredit for operations on very short runways(800 - 1,000 m)
■ Unpaved runways certification (laterite, soil,gravel, grass)
■ Narrow runways operations, down to 14mwidth
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 49
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72-500 - PW127FBlock Fuel & Block Time on typicalsectors
611 kg (1,347 lb)55.4 min
854 kg (1,883 lb)78 min
The most efficient compromisebetween low fuel consumption and speed
The most efficient compromisebetween low fuel consumption and speed
300 NM Stage300 NM Stage
200 NM Stage200 NM Stage
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 51
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
The New ATR GenerationATR 72-500Commonality Benefits
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 53
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
■ Entry into service aircrewtraining
■ Simulators economics■ Airframe spares■ Engines spares
■ Aircrew training■ Aircrew productivity
The savings brought about by commonality mainly comefrom the aircrew-related costs.
These result from the benefits of common type rating allowingunrestricted mixed fleet flying and reduced training requirements.
The savings brought about by commonality mainly comefrom the aircrew-related costs.
These result from the benefits of common type rating allowingunrestricted mixed fleet flying and reduced training requirements.
ATR -500 SeriesCommonality Saving Areas
“UP FRONT”“UP FRONT” “STEADY STATE”“STEADY STATE”
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 54
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SATR Family Commonality SavingsAssuming a mixed fleet of 10 ATR -500 as opposed to an equivalent fleetcomposed of different a/c with no commonality
“Steady state” (aircrew related)
“Up front”
Aircrew training
Aircrewproductivity
Airframe spares
Engine spares
68%68%
32%32%
Commonality Savings:USD 150,000 per year/per aircraft
Commonality Savings:USD 150,000 per year/per aircraft
Overheads and maintenance costs reduced
Reduced mechanics training costsReduced investment in spare parts
Enhanced operational flexibility
Overheads and maintenance costs reduced
Reduced mechanics training costsReduced investment in spare parts
Enhanced operational flexibility
Costs reduced, productivity increased
Less new-type training cost and time Higher crew productivity
Easier crew scheduling and standby
Costs reduced, productivity increased
Less new-type training cost and time Higher crew productivity
Easier crew scheduling and standby
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 55
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SATR Family Commonality
Common42-500 / 72-500
Common42-500 / 72-500
Cockpit LayoutAvionicsEnginesPropellersHydraulic systemsElectric systemsFuel systemAir Conditioning PacksFlight ControlsPassenger CabinNose Landing Gear
Common Type Rating (CTR)
Pilots: the difference course between ATR 42-500& ATR 72-500 is only 3 hour ground course.
Pilots: the difference course between ATR 42-500& ATR 72-500 is only 3 hour ground course.
Spares Inventory: about 90% of common spares in Part NumbersSpares Inventory: about 90% of common spares in Part Numbers
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 56
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR Family Commonality SavingsAssuming a mixed fleet of 10 ATR -500 as opposed to an equivalentfleet composed of different a/c with no commonality
Training 1,174K$
Payroll 9,000K$
Initial Provisioning
4,794K$
Total Savings over 10 years = 15 MUSDTotal Savings over 10 years = 15 MUSD
Commonality benefits sum-up:● 5 less required crews● 13% reduced training time● 15 MUSD savings for 10 years of
operation● 4% reduction in fleet DOC
Commonality benefits sum-up:● 5 less required crews● 13% reduced training time● 15 MUSD savings for 10 years of
operation● 4% reduction in fleet DOC
8%
32%
60%
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 57
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
The New ATR GenerationATR 72-500Unbeatable economics
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 58
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
Unbeatable economicsEconomy is a major advantage of ATR -500 seriesaircraft, thanks to:
■ Low maintenance costsThrough simple, mature systems and design-to-maintainphilosophy
■ Commonality benefits for airlines operating a mixed ATRfleet
■ Excellent reliability resulting from more than 11 millionhours of in service experience worldwide
■ Low direct operating costsThe ATR 72-500 has the lowest seat-mile costs in its marketsegment.
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 59
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Economic AssumptionsNorth American and European Environment, Standard Economics
Stage length 200 and 300 NM
Fuel Price 0.80 US$/gal. (US)0.90 US$/gal (EU)
Aircraft prices As published by price catalog
Spares 10% of aircraft price
Depreciation 12 years with 20% residual value
Financing 85% of investment overs 10 years
Interest 5% per year
Insurance 1% of aircraft price/year
Block time & fuel Minimum time schedule(time allow.: 4 min taxi)
Annual utilization 200NM:2700 flights (US env.)2200 flights (EU env.)
300NM:2200 flights (US env.)1800 flights (EU env.)
Crew Cockpit TP StatisticalCockpit Jet StatisticalCabin 20$/BH/attendant (US)
35$/BH/attendant (EU)
Maintenance ATR family As estimated by ATRCompetitors Estimated by ATR and
based onmanufacturers data
Off A/C subcont. 90%
Maint. Labour rate Powerplant 69.75 US$/MHIn house 25 US$/MHContracted 63 US$/MH
Landing charges US type; General method in EU env.
Navigation charges Not considered in US env.Eurocontrol in EU env.
Ground handling Not considered
Provision for IOC 100% cash DOC(fuel + crew + maintenance + charges)
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 60
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SATR 72-500DOC/Trip - 200 NM sector
US groundrules
Investment related costs $/trip 734Maintenance- Airframe $/trip 117- Engine $/trip 120
Crew- Cockpit $/trip 106- Cabin $/trip 39
Landing/parking charges $/trip 109
Fuel $/trip 182
Cash DOC/trip $/trip 674
DOC/trip $/trip 1,407
DOC/ASM ¢/NM 10.35
European groundrules
Investment related costs $/trip 867Maintenance- Airframe $/trip 117- Engine $/trip 120
Crew- Cockpit $/trip 233- Cabin $/trip 68
Navigation charges $/trip 201Landing/parking charges $/trip 280
Fuel $/trip 205
Cash DOC/trip $/trip 1,226
DOC/trip $/trip 2,093
DOC/ASM ¢/NM 15.39
With the same assumptions, ATR 72-500 operating costsare about 20% lower than those of its direct competitor.
With the same assumptions, ATR 72-500 operating costsare about 20% lower than those of its direct competitor.
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 61
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72-500DOC/Trip - 300 NM sector
US groundrules
Investment related costs $/trip 867Maintenance- Airframe $/trip 145- Engine $/trip 155
Crew- Cockpit $/trip 146- Cabin $/trip 54
Landing/parking charges $/trip 109
Fuel $/trip 255
Cash DOC/trip $/trip 863
DOC/trip $/trip 1,731
DOC/ASM ¢/NM 8.48
European groundrules
Investment related costs $/trip 1,060Maintenance- Airframe $/trip 145- Engine $/trip 155
Crew- Cockpit $/trip 320- Cabin $/trip 94
Navigation charges $/trip 302Landing/parking charges $/trip 280
Fuel $/trip 287
Cash DOC/trip $/trip 1,583
DOC/trip $/trip 2,643
DOC/ASM ¢/NM 12.96
ATR 72-500: Unmatched costs per seat, unbeatable economics.ATR 72-500: Unmatched costs per seat, unbeatable economics.
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 62
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Direct Operating Costs200 Nm and 300 Nm sector - EU environmentThe ATR 72-500 is by far more cost efficient
ATR 72-500 Dash 8-Q400 CRJ-700 ATR 72-500 Dash 8-Q400 CRJ-700
Cash Operating costs Investment related costs
DOC/trip+19%
DOC/trip+45%
DOC/trip+17%
DOC/trip+40%
Dire
ct o
pera
ting
cost
per
trip
ATR 72-500 less expensive to operate when compared to similar sizedturboprop and jet competitors on typical regional sectors
There is no competition between 70-seater turboprop and jeton short-haul sectors. Turboprops are unrivalled.
ATR 72-500 less expensive to operate when compared to similar sizedturboprop and jet competitors on typical regional sectors
There is no competition between 70-seater turboprop and jeton short-haul sectors. Turboprops are unrivalled.
200 NM200 NM 300 NM300 NM
68 seats 72 seats 70 seats
Datum
+19%
+19%
+33%
+62%
+18%
+62%
+16% +26%
Datum
Dire
ct o
pera
ting
cost
per
trip
68 seats 72 seats 70 seats
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 63
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Detailed Cash Operating Costs200 NM sector - U.S. environment
182 258 234 315120
134 176217
117
151 108
132
145
144 109
160
109
135111
151
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
ATR 72-500 Dash 8-Q400 CRJ-200 CRJ-700
Fuel Engine maintenance Airframe maintenanceCrew Landing + parking fees
+22%
Cash operating costper trip in $
More than offset the speed effect evenwhen compared to 50-seater jet.
More than offset the speed effect evenwhen compared to 50-seater jet.
68 seats 70 seats 50 seats 70 seats
+45%
+9%The ATR 72-500main advantages:
■ Lower engine andairframe maintenancecosts
■ Less fuel costs■ Significantly lower
airport charges
Datum
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 64
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SDirect Operating Cost Per Seat
Despite featuring 4 more seats, the Dash 8-Q400 is unable to matchthe cost per seat of the ATR 72-500
in an European airline cost environment.
Despite featuring 4 more seats, the Dash 8-Q400 is unable to matchthe cost per seat of the ATR 72-500
in an European airline cost environment.
ATR 72-50068 seats
Dash 8-Q40070 seats (US)
North American environmentNorth American environment European environmentEuropean environment
300NM
200 NM
300 NM
200 NM
+ 17%
+ 15%
Reference
300NM
200 NM
300 NM
200 NM
+ 12%
+ 10%
Reference
72 seats
Dash 8-Q40072 seats (EU)
Nota: 90% of the -Q400 current fleet are operated in configurations comparable to ATR 72 (between 70 and 72 seats).
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 65
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
The New ATR GenerationATR 72-500Maintenance
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 66
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR -500 SeriesDesigned to Ease Customer Operation
■ Excellent accessibility of mainsystems and controls
■ Systems simplicity andmaximum interchangeability ofparts and mechanisms (extensiveuse of LRUs)
■ Reliability (built-in testequipments, maintenance panelsin the cockpit)
■ Reduced maintenance workinghours
The “Design to Maintain” philosophy, leading to the lowestmaintenance costs per flight hour in the market.
The “Design to Maintain” philosophy, leading to the lowestmaintenance costs per flight hour in the market.
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 67
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SDispatch ReliabilityWorld fleet (15 mn WATOG)
98
98,2
98,4
98,6
98,8
99
99,2
99,4
99,6
99,8
100
8-01
9-01
10-0
1
11-0
1
12-0
1
1-02
2-02
3-02
4-02
5-02
6-02
7-02
8-02
9-02
10-0
2
11-0
2
12-0
2
1-03
Dis
patc
h R
elia
bilit
y %
ATR 42-500ATR 72-500
ATR 42-300ATR 72-200
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 68
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
SEOUL AIR
Access to flight controls from cabin(hinged, quick release hat-racks)
Large butterfly doorsfor engine access
Avionics, electrics and batteriesin racks behind pilots
Hydraulicbay
Air conditioningpacks
Rear bay(CVR, DFDR, flight
controls)
Excellent Accessibility
Designed for
Maintenance
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 69
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR 72Basic Inspection Frame
Line - Line check (2 calendar days)- Weekly check (7 days) Tasks performed: zonal visual inspections, operational checks and servicing.
A checks - Every 500 FHTasks performed: zonal visual inspections, B.I.T.E. checks, operational checkslubrication and servicing
C checks - Every 4000 FHTasks performed: zonal visual inspections, operational and functional checks ofaircraft and powerplant systems
Structural inspections- Environmental damage- Fatigue damage
Tasks performed: general and detailed visual inspections, special detailed inspections
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 70
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SATR 72Structural Inspections
Environmental damage (corrosion)- Thresholds: 2, 4 and 8 years- Repeat intervals: 2, 4 and 8 years
Fatigue damage- Thresholds: 18,000, 24,000 and 36,000 flights- Repeat intervals: 3,000, 6,000, 9,000, 12,000, 18,000 and 24,000 flights
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 71
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S ATR A ChecksZonal visual checks, bite checks, lubrication, servicing, operational tests
Manhours quoted account for unscheduled work.
2,000 FH/Year2,000 FL/Year
0MH
20MH
40MH
60MH
80MH
100MH
120MH
1A 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 8A
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 72
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
Manhours quoted accunt for unscheduled work.
2,000 FH/Year2,000 FL/Year
0MH
50MH
100MH
150MH
200MH
250MH
1C 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C
ATR C ChecksZonal visual inspections, operational and functional test ofaircraft and powerplant systems
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 73
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
Engine Maintenance Programme
On condition No scheduled HSI / OVH. Engine removal for refurbishment driven by on wingtasks and ECTM (Trend Monitoring)Proven to be the most cost effective way ofmaintaining engines.
Estimated operating cost reduction in the range of10%-15% (when compared to hard-time condition).
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 74
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SMajor Inspection Intervals
The following Majors Inspection Intervals have been approved for the ATR 42-500:
PW 127E engine TBO 8,000 FH
568F propeller TBO 8,100 FH (15,000 FH objective)
Landing gear TBO 18,000 cycles or 9 years(whichever comes first)
Aircraft structure 8 years and 36,000 cycles
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 75
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S
Customer Support
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 76
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
SCustomer Support
Washington
ToulouseHead Office
Spares Logistic CentreATR Training Centre
Singapore
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 77
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Training Centres
Flight SafetyHouston
2 FFS
ATRToulouse
3 FFS
AMR EagleDallas1 FFS
BritairMorlaix1 FFS
FinnairHelsinki1 FFS
Flight SafetyAtlanta1 FFS
OrbitBangkok
1 FFS
OlympicThessalonica
1 FFS
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 78
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Technical Support Engineering
No cost for the OperatorsNo cost for the Operators
Technical assistance- Trouble shooting- Working parties- Video inspections
Maintenance cost and planning
Permanent technical desk, 24h/24 service
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 79
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Spares Operations
■ World-wide
■ Around the clock
■ Comprehensive
■ Customised
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 80
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S World-wide … Around the Clock
SingaporeSingapore
ToulouseToulouse
WashingtonWashington
■ Capability to ship any part, anywhere, immediately 24 hours a day
■ Spares specialists available 24 hours a day in three locations (Toulouse, Washington, Singapore)
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 81
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Global Maintenance Agreement: GMA
The aim of this service is based on three axis:
■ Availability of parts with a minimum on-site spares investment.■ Simplicity through a single channel service.■ Fixed price per flight hour with a modular approach.
This service can encompass various services such as:
■ Rotable on-site stock■ Rotable pool access■ Rotable repair & overhaul■ Engines, propellers, landing gear repair & overhaul
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 82
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Global Maintenance Agreement: GMA
Repair by the hour combined with pool stock
USR : Unserviceable unitSR : Serviceable unit
GSEHardware
QEC
CriticalCritical
Rotables
Airline’s warehouse
RotablesPool
CUSTOMER’s SITE ATR SITEUSR
SR
1 32
4
5
2* (alternative)SR
ATR logistics platforms & warehouses
Repairs
(if parts doesn’t belong to on-site stock)
Scenario 1Failed unit belonging to on-site stock1 - Unserviceable unit removed from a/c.2 - Replacement unit fitted from on-site stock.3 - Unserviceable unit sent to ATR, whomanage repair.4 - Replacement unit sent to customer store.5 - Repaired unit returned to ATR pool.
Scenario 2Failed unit not belonging to on-site stock1 - Unserviceable unit removed from a/c.2*- Replacement unit fitted from rotable pool.3 - Unserviceable unit sent to ATR, whomanage repair.5 - Repaired unit returned to ATR pool.
ATRstock
An Alenia Aeronautica and EADS joint ventureJune 2003 Page 83
AT
R 7
2-50
0 R
ES
PO
ND
ING
TO
MA
RK
ET
NE
ED
S Conclusion
The ATR 72-500 has been voted Best Regional Aircraft by Investors andOperators (Airfinance Journal, Investors’ and Operators’ Poll, Sept. 2002, aswell in 1999, ranked second after ATR 42-500 in 2001).
This was not a surprise for the 43 operators flying routinely more than 280 ATR72 worldwide.
They know why this aircraft is the industry benchmark for operating costs perseat.
With the New Generation ATR 72-500, ATR is poised to maintain its leadershipin turboprops throughout regional airlines in the world.
Fly ATR 72-500We are committed to improve your bottom line.
Fly ATR 72-500We are committed to improve your bottom line.