atmospheric aerosol profiling with a bistatic imaging lidar system
Post on 30-Sep-2016
Embed Size (px)
Atmospheric aerosol profiling with a bistatic imaging lidarsystem
John E. Barnes, N. C. Parikh Sharma, and Trevor B. Kaplan
Atmospheric aerosols have been profiled using a simple, imaging, bistatic lidar system.A vertical laser beamis imaged onto a charge-coupled-device camera from the ground to the zenith with a wide-angle lens(CLidar). The altitudes are derived geometrically from the position of the camera and laser with submeterresolution near the ground. The system requires no overlap correction needed in monostatic lidar systemsand needs a much smaller dynamic range. Nighttime measurements of both molecular and aerosol scat-tering were made at Mauna Loa Observatory. The CLidar aerosol total scatter compares very well with anephelometer measuring at 10 m above the ground. The results build on earlier work that compared purelymolecular scattered light to theory, and detail instrument improvements. 2007 Optical Society ofAmerica
OCIS codes: 010.1100, 010.1110, 010.1120, 010.3640, 040.1520, 010.1310.
Mapping the aerosol structure of the atmosphere overboth time and altitude provides important informationfor a host of atmospheric science research fields. Aero-sols play a role in climate change1 both directly, byaffecting Earths radiation balance, and indirectly, byaffecting cloud properties. Understanding their contri-bution to climate change will require active aerosolprofiling information.2 Both natural and manmadeaerosols impact local and regional air quality, leadingto human health and public policy implications. Aero-sols may be used as tracers for air mass transport andatmospheric dynamics studies. Aerosols also play arole in local precipitation patterns. Many of the effectsof aerosols depend strongly on aerosol properties thatare highly variable with altitude including aerosoltypes, chemistry, and concentrations. Thus aerosolprofiling fills an important need in the atmosphericscience community.
Aerosol distribution in the atmosphere is nonuni-form, with most aerosols occurring in the first fewkilometers of the atmosphere. This low-altitudeaerosol-rich region is typically colocated with theboundary layer. Measurements of boundary layeraerosols, while highly important, are often technicallychallenging. In situ aerosol measurements may bemade at a variety of altitudes by plane or balloon-borne instruments. Such measurements are oftenable to provide more specific aerosol information(e.g., chemical composition) than remote-sensing tech-niques. They are, however, expensive and typicallyprovide only a few profiles. Thus theymay notmap thetemporal evolution of the aerosol structure. Passive,ground-based, remote-sensing aerosol measurementsare often conducted with radiometers, which provideintegrated aerosol optical depth over the entire atmo-sphere. Advantages of these types of measurementsinclude their relatively low cost and their ability to berun continuously. A primary disadvantage is the in-ability to generate the altitude-dependent aerosol pro-file.Lidar remote sensing of aerosol profiles offers capa-
bilities for altitude and time-series monitoring of aero-sol conditions. The most frequently used lidar systemsfor this purpose are elastic backscatter lidars, whichemploy pulsed laser transmitters and collect backscat-tered light with a colocated time-binned detector.Often elastic lidar is used in conjunction with otherinstruments3 (e.g., Sun photometers) as one parameteris measured and two parameters (extinction and back-scatter) are to be determined. An alternate method4
J. E. Barnes (John.E.Barnes@noaa.gov) and T. B. Kaplan arewith the NOAAEarth System Research LaboratoryGlobal Mon-itoring Division, Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, 1437 KilaueaAvenue, Hilo, Hawaii 96720. N. C. Parikh Sharma is with theDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, Central ConnecticutState University, 1615 Stanley Street, New Britain, Connecticut06050, USA.Received 19 July 2006; revised 7 November 2006; accepted 11
December 2006; posted 22 January 2007 (Doc. ID 73181); pub-lished 1 May 2007.0003-6935/07/152922-08$15.00/0 2007 Optical Society of America
2922 APPLIED OPTICS Vol. 46, No. 15 20 May 2007
uses the Raman scattered signal to get extinction.Aerosol scatter has also been measured with multipleor movable receivers in conjunction with lidar andused to derive aerosol properties under well-mixedconditions.57 Challenges faced by typical lidar instru-ments include possible afterpulse effects8 (which couldlead to detector saturation at the lowest altitudes),large dynamic-range requirements,8 and field-of-viewoverlap effects9,10 (in which the illuminated volume isnot entirely within the detector field of view at near-instrument ranges). Frequently data from elasticbackscatter lidars are not used within the overlaprange, which is precisely the near-ground range ofinterest in many cases. There are monitoring pro-grams using 500 m towers11 that could benefit fromwell-calibrated aerosol measurements throughoutthis region.An alternative bistatic lidar instrument has been
developed and tested for profiling a boundary-layeraerosol.12 The instrument employs the bistatic con-figuration in which the laser transmitter and thedetector are spatially separated. The new instru-ment, calledCLidar, uses aCCD camera as its detectorand determines scattering altitudes from geometryrather than timing considerations. Compared withtraditional monostatic lidar, the new approach hassubstantially less stringent dynamic-range require-ments.12,13 Integration of the signal is performed onthe camera and data acquisition is the camera-supplied control electronics. Afterpulse saturation ef-fects are eliminated. The new instrument also providesuseful data from where the beam is first imaged withexcellent near-ground altitude resolution. As with allbistatic systems, the scattering angle changes withaltitude. Aerosol properties may be derived from bi-static signals given additionalmeasurements or appro-priate assumptions.
The CCD camera-based lidar (CLidar) system imagesa vertical pulsed laser beam onto a CCD using wide-angle optics. The choice of wide-angle optics eliminatesthe need for scanning to cover the entire altituderange. This system operates only at night. The first-generation CLidar system, its altitude resolution, anddynamic-range requirements, are described in detailin Barnes et al.12 A second systemhas been designed toenhance the signal-to-noise ratio. A schematic of thegeometry is shown in Fig. 1.The CCD camera and optics are located a distance
D away from the laser. The laser transmits light withenergy EL. Here EL represents the total laser energysummed over the image exposure time. The lightscatters off air molecules, aerosols andor cloud par-ticles, and the portion of the scatter, which is in thedirection of the scattering angle and is at the po-larization angle , is collected by the wide-angle op-tics and imaged onto a CCD. The polarization angle isdetermined by the plane of polarization of the laserand the location of the camera.12 For each pixel in theresulting image, the altitude may be calculated frommeasurements of camera location in relation to the
laser and from the field of view per pixel. The inten-sity of the scattering is given by the recorded counts.The CLidar signal, Er, is made up of the photonsmeasured by a pixel with field of view d, from ascattering event that took place at altitude z andrange R from the camera.12 The analysis here as-sumes that d is constant, which requires the opticsto accurately (linearly in angle) image the laser beam.The signal Er is given as
ErKELATatm zTatm R, , zdzR2, (1)
where dz is given by
dz R2Dtand21 zDtand2 R cosd2 zRDsind2DR sind2 1.
Here K is a calibration constant representing thesystem optical efficiency and A is the effective collect-ing area of the optics, Tatm z and Tatm R are the total(aerosol and molecular) atmospheric transmittancefrom the laser to altitude z and from altitude z alongthe slant path R to the CCD detector, respectively,and , , z is the scattering coefficient. In practice,dzR2 in Eq. (1) is very nearly equal to dD, whichmeans that Eq. (1) does not have the 1R2 depen-dence of the familiar lidar equation.12,13 The altitudeimaged in each pixel grows with height in such a wayas to almost cancel out the typical R2 dependence oftraditional backscatter lidar signals, resulting in lowdynamic-range requirements. This also leads to analtitude resolution, which is excellent in the near-ground region for which the instrument is designed,but which degrades at higher altitudes.It is often desirable to use the aerosol backscatter
signal from a lidar quantitatively, for example, tocalculate extinction (total scatter plus absorption) oraerosol optical depth. This requires a relation betweenthe light scattered at a single angle and total scatter(extinction-to-backscatter ratio in monostatic lidar),which must be either calculated from assumed aerosolparameters or related to additional measurements.
Fig. 1. CLidar system schematic.
20 May 2007 Vol. 46, No. 15 APPLIED OPTICS 2923
This can lead to large errors in the quantitativeparameters since the angular dependence of aero-sol scatter, the aerosol phase function, varies widely,especially in the 90180 range. In Fig. 4 of Ansmannet al.,2 for example, the extinction-to-backscatter ratiovaried by a factor of 3 in the boundary layer measure-ments of extinction. The same can be true for somesatellite retrievals of aerosols that rely on single-anglescatter. Kalashnikova and Sokolik14 used microscopydata and discrete-dipole approximation calculations toestimate the phase functions for mixtures of mineraldust characterized by particular combinations of com-position, shape, and size. This study showed that aero-sol optical depth retrieval